The Facts of WHAT Is Happening vs the WHY of Deep State Motives — Don't Waste Good Facts on Bad Faith — People of Power Know the Truth but Pretend Otherwise for Power or Opportunism

There's been lots of talk of Who/Whom, but it also comes down to What/Why, or one mustn't lose sight of the WHY in the blindsided pursuit of the WHAT. Of course, we need to nail down the WHAT, the facts of what's really happening. But, in focusing solely on the WHAT, there's the risk of overlooking the bigger problem of the WHY, or why do the elites who know the what(of what's really happening) keep pretending they don't know and push the big lie? Why the Lie?

People like Heather MacDonald, Colin Flaherty(of "White Girls Bleed A Lot"), and Paul Kersey of SBPDL have detailed ad infinitum on the WHAT of black crime and social pathologies. They said it over and over and over and backed it with facts caught on video, recorded in statistics, and/or reported by local news. So, there is no way the elites don't know the WHAT. They know. And blacks who live in the black community know the WHAT as well. They know most blacks are killed by blacks. And black leaders/elites know this too, the WHAT. (By the way, the police doesn't seem to appreciate support from conservatives because Jews control the gods. Police are people too and therefore affected by Jewish controlled media and academia; so, despite what they see on a daily basis, they too regard blacks and 'progressives' more highly than 'racist' conservatives. So, no matter how much conservatives support The Blue, the Blue feels disgruntled of being associated with 'bigotry' and 'racism' said to be rife on the Right.)

If indeed the problem of the elites were ignorance and naivete, we could concentrate on the WHAT and keep hammering the nails of facts in the hope that the ruling elites will finally realize the truth of what's really happening. But over the years, no amount of speaking the truth has done any good. The elites keep favoring lies over truth.
There is no way Jews don't know about the black reality. They saw what happened to New York from the 1960s to the early 1990s. And, there's a good reason why Israel especially doesn't want black migrants; Zionists know Africans are problematic. Jews know blacks are more muscular, aggressive, and impulsive. In private conversations among themselves and with goyim they trust, Jews will admit that 80% of America's problems owe to blacks. (They'll also admit Jews control the media.) So, they know privately but will not admit publicly. And when individual Jews enter media or government, they never speak the truth even though they know certain things to be absolutely true.

So, at some point, we need to obsess less on the WHAT and focus more on the WHY. And on that score, David Duke(despite his checkered past) is actually better than most figures on the so-called Dissident Right. Dr. Duke, though kooky in certain respects, directs the focus on the fact of Jewish Supremacist Power and explains the WHY of the Jewish Lie. Duke knows the problem with the Jews and the cucked goy elites is not ignorance but malignance. Jews are for total power, and they regard Black Magic as an effective way to bait whites with 'white guilt' and hook them with jungle fever.

DAVID DUKE: FACTS OF JEWISH SUPREMACY AND JEWISH RACISM AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE

Indeed, the Jewish Media and Elites are not suffering from the Big Ignorance but willfully indulging in the Big Lie because what matters most to them is money, power, prestige, and control than truth and justice. Jews value blacks as money-makers in sports and music industries controlled by Jews. Jews value black history/slavery as a gold mine of 'white guilt' that paralyzes white pride and agency, thereby turning whites into cuck-slaves of Jews and their allies, especially blacks and homos. Jews value black muscle to emasculate the white man into cuck-maggotry, thus rendering him even more servile. This way, the white man is cucked in both morality and manhood.

Also, by having holy blacks as allies, Jews can prevent the formation of the Black-Palestinian Alliance. Why was MLK so valuable to Jews? Because, even as MLK championed racial equality in the US, he supported Jewish Supremacism in Palestine/Israel. He became holy for his struggle for justice in America but was also allied with Zionists. Thus, Jews could push the political equation: Equal Justice = Support for Israel.
Mandela was a trickier matter for Jews because Israel was South Africa's #1 ally whereas ANC was allied with PLO. But of course, Jews hedged their bets. Even though rich Jews worked with Afrikaners against the black majority and even though Apartheid South Africa and Zionist-Supremacist Israel were joined at the hip, there were also Jewish Communists like Joe Slovo who bet on the Black Horse in South Africa. So, when Apartheid finally ended, Jews could say to blacks, "You see, we Jews were on your side." And Jews funneled so much cash to Mandela that he became chummy with Israel despite the fact that it had supported the Apartheid Regime and practices a far more brutal form of apartheid in the West Bank and Gaza. Of course, Jews must pay off blacks, and this isn't cheap, but then, Jews rake in so much money from black sports/music that the whole operation pays for itself.

It is time to focus less on the WHAT and more on the WHY. Indeed, the Power is mostly about the WHY than the WHAT. If we ponder the WHY, it's obvious why the Power so often prefers the Lie over the Truth. The Power is all about maintaining its grip, and more often than not, the truth is usually more damaging to the Power. It's like Elizabeth Holmes and other creeps at Theranos knew all about the WHAT, that they were pushing a fraud. So, WHY did they do it? Because they wanted the investments, profits, and adulation. No amount of facts would have convinced Holmes who only cared about How to serve the Why. Holmes was ultimately about her idolatrous apotheosis as the female Steve Jobs than about truth, health, saving lives, and etc. It was all about egotism. Likewise, the Sackler Family didn't care about all those dead white goy lives, which were expendable. Sackers surely knew that opioids were devastating white working class Americans. But they didn't care as long as they got the money, and with that money, they could buy moral prestige as famous philanthropists of the arts and good works.

Then, it's so easy to understand the WHY of Black Lives Matter. We can detail the WHAT of black crime and how BLM is built on a pack of lies, but BLM doesn't care about facts because it is really motivated by ethnocentrism of black self-worship. Blacks, like Jews and Homos, are perfect and never to be blamed. In the Bible, God is perfect and whatever He does or whatever happens can NEVER be blamed on Him. The blame must always fall on systemically sinful humanity. In our secular age, Jews control the gods, and the three holies are Jews, blacks, and homos. We must revere them as near-perfect, and so, even when bad things happen around them due to their bad behavior, the fault is not with them but with us for having failed them. So, if blacks loot and burn down cities, it is no fault of their own but their righteous punishment and smiting of us who didn't work hard enough to create a social order worthy of their divine presence.

Indeed, the fact that blacks, Jews, and progs resort to yapping about 'systemic racism' is they know BLM is factually unsound. The statistics invalidate BLM as facts tell another story: Too many blacks kill other blacks and non-blacks as well. So, to justify BLM, they frame the protests, riots, and vandalism in the larger perspective of the history and 'systemic racism'. Using this logic, anyone can justify anything. I can rob & steal and justify my crime as a rebellion against 'systemic oppression' since most of history has been about the powerful exploiting the powerless. I can invoke Cain & Abel and justify whatever I do as a rebellion against the sinfulness of humanity, i.e. since all of humanity has been so brutal and dark, I must be too in order to 'survive'.
It's a general rule that people invoke 'heaven' and make highfalutin claims because facts on the ground go against them. If a black steals from you, the facts favor you and incriminate the black. So, the black invokes HISTORY to justify his deed: "Heaven's on my side, so whatever I do, no matter how devilish, has the blessing from above." (Hunter Biden, Jussie Smollett, and BLM thugs all have one thing in common. In an order where Jews control the gods, them three stooges got new heaven on their side, so whatever they do can't be wrong.)
Any factual investigation of the Jewish-Palestinian Conflict will favor Palestinians, a wholly innocent people who did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING but were driven off their lands by Jewish Immigrant-invaders backed by Western Imperialists and even the Soviet Union. Since facts of the matter favor Palestinians, Jews invoke the Big History of the Holocaust to justify the theft. Never mind Palestinians had nothing to do with WWII or the Shoah, and furthermore, Israel was created AFTER the defeat of Nazi Germany, which means Jews no longer faced extermination in Europe. In the modern era, Jews won the war of worming-heaven with serpent's eggs of the new trinity of Jew-hova, Homo-mania, and Afrotheosis.

BLM is like a holy war, and it has no use of facts or moral consistency, but then, the same could be said of the Crusades. Christianity is about love, peace, forgiveness, and pacifism. Jesus never told anyone to pick up swords and fight wars and build empires built on skulls. So, why did the Crusaders and later European Imperialists wave the banner of Jesus while carrying out massive acts of violence that clearly went against Jesus's teachings? Because they were really about power and pride than anything else. They didn't care about the WHAT of their deeds. Factually, they were acting against Jesus's teachings. But, it didn't matter because they were into power, glory, wealth, and prestige. So, Jesus mattered less as teacher than as symbolism. He was used to bless and sanctify the power and wealth of the West. This way, Westerners could go around the world conquering, plundering, slaughtering, and pillaging. As long as they carried the banner and cross of Jesus wherever they went, they could make believe they were the holy warriors of justice and love.
BLM works much the same way. Blacks are most obsessed with pride and power that count for more than any actual black lives. Just like dead soldiers are the price for victory and glory, more dead blacks due to BLM are the worthy cost of something better: Negro godhood. More dead blacks are just casualties of a righteous war as far as many blacks are concerned. This is especially true of black elites as they won't be the ones doing the dying. From where they're perched, they will have gained immense prestige thanks to BLM sacralization of the Negro. (By the way, if blacks don't care about More Dead Blacks, why should the Dissident Right make a fuss about the actual WHAT? Why should they counter BLM with real-black-lives-matter that despairs of how BLM-led policies have led to more deaths among blacks? If blacks don't care about their actual dead and, furthermore, hate and attack your kind, the LAST THING you should be doing is worrying about more dead blacks.)

But then, ADL, AIPAC, and SPLC operate much like BLM. They are controlled by people who secretly know the WHAT. They are no dummies or ignoramuses. They know the truth about black criminality. They also know the facts of how Jews stole land from the Palestinians and are ruthlessly plotting to wreak more havoc in the Middle East to ensure Jewish-Zionist supremacism. Those reasons are WHY they do what they do. As the WHAT undermines their WHY, they use their near-monopoly of media and institutions to push the Big Lie.

Why does the Jewish-controlled Deep State operate as it does? Now, when it comes to small matters, the FBI probably does really good work. There's sure to be far less politics involved in going after lesser crooks and criminals. But higher up the FBI, the issue of justice becomes intermeshed with the ways of power. People-of-Power or POP don't want the justice to apply to them, and as they buy the politicians who appoint the top heads of FBI, CIA, and other elite institutions, the upper echelons of the Deep State operate solely on the HOW to serve the WHY than on the facts of the WHAT. Indeed, why is it that Jonathan Pollard was released and allowed a hero's welcome in Israel? How come Arnon Milchan can walk around freely in the US and serve as king-maker when he admitted to stealing nuclear secrets for Israel? Where is the FBI and the CIA?

It's possible that many in the Dissident Right prefer to discuss the WHAT than the WHY because it's less risque. By hammering on the WHAT, they can pretend that the Power is simply ignorant, benighted, or clueless. So, they go on and on with statistics like number-crunchers. They are little more than social accountants. They don't want to deal with the WHY because they would have to focus on Jewish Power and explain why the Jews who know the truth willfully push the lie to maintain their control and power. Going there, one would be accused of 'antisemitism' and worse. But, this is dishonest and even cowardly. No matter how much truth you speak, you are dishonest if you keep pretending that the enemy simply doesn't know when, in fact, you damn well know that he damn well knows but is willfully pushing the lie for power-sake.

Suppose there is Bob and Bill. Bill keeps letting the pitbull out, and it attacks Bob. So, Bob explains to Bill that pitbulls are dangerous and can hurt people real bad; therefore, Bill should stop letting the pitbull out. Now, Bob would be right to speak the truth to Bill if indeed Bill didn't know that pitbulls are dangerous. That way, there's a good chance that Bill will realize the truth and no longer let the pitbull out.
But, suppose Bill lets the dog out repeatedly and Bob gets attacked over and over. By this point, it should be obvious to Bob that Bill knows that pitbulls are dangerous, is feigning ignorance and willfully letting it out for the express purpose of having Bob attacked and bloodied. But if, after so many attacks, Bob is still discussing the WHAT of the dangers posed by pitbulls than redirecting his focus on the WHY of Bill's viciousness and sadism, he is pretty useless regardless of the facts he lays out. He can gather all the facts and statistics about pitbulls and lay them at Bill's feet, but Bill will keep letting the pitbull out to attack Bob because the WHY that really motivates him is to see Bob get hurt and humiliated.

It's like the scene in Federico Fellini's AMARCORD. The student is feigning ineptitude just to mock the teacher in front of the class. The teacher's earnest effort is all for naught in face of motivation whose sole purpose is to make him look ridiculous. Too many on the Dissident Right are earnestly arguing with bad faith actors. Don't waste good facts on bad faith.

So, whether it's BLM or the bogus War on Terror, we need to focus less on the WHAT of the facts and more on the WHY of Jewish Power(without whose media-and-money-support, BLM wouldn't be possible). At this point, an honest assessment of the political psychology of Jewish Power and the Deep State will be more useful than all the facts and data we can stack up. Indeed, Juliann Assange and Edward Snowden can tell you that. What did they do but reveal the facts and raw data of how the Deep State really operates? They were titans of the WHAT. So, how did the Deep State and Jewish Power react to this mountain of facts? They did everything to cover it up and destroy the lives of whistle-blowers. It's because the Deep State isn't about truth or justice but about the Power guarding its power to do as it pleases. The WHY directs the Deep State to focus on the HOW to keep the power than any other consideration. So, less about What's Happening than Why Is It Happening.

When WHITE POWER is Taboo, the Only Thing a White Individual can hope for is White Privilege — In that sense, We are living in the Age of White Privilege

The so-called Left yammers on and on about 'white privilege' while many on the 'right' deny it exists. It's more accurate to say White Privilege does exist but as a function of White Submission than of White Supremacism. After all, if indeed the entirety of white race had a solid supremacist position over all other races, there would be no need for White Privilege. Who needs privilege when you got supremacist power over others? Even though White Supremacism is racially defined, it is at least universalist within the white race, i.e. all whites, smart or dumb, rich or poor, share in their superiority & supremacy over or security & safety from other peoples, groups, and races. So, even though some whites would be socially and/or economically privileged over other whites, ALL whites would be universal in their superiority over or security from other races. There would be no White Privilege because ALL whites would share in the dominance. It would be universalist within the particularity of the white race.

The term 'privilege' connotes something more than domination or shared power/position. It implies 'exceptionality' limited to a few. Thus, if something is broadly shared by the entire population, it doesn't qualify as privilege EVEN IF another group is broadly kept in a subservient position. So, if society is made up 50/50 of People A and People B and if ALL members of People A have superiority over all members of People B, it can be called Power but not Privilege. Power unites, Privilege divides. Power for People A would unite all of them, from rich to poor. In contrast, Privilege for People A would mean only select members of the group would enjoy special advantages or exemptions from burdens shared by the rest. If indeed People A had Power over People B, privilege would matter more among People B as some of them would seek favors that would advantage them over most of their kind who must keep within the subservient position.
In the American South, a white man, no matter how poor, could not be enslaved. This fact united him with other whites. Rich or poor, whites could not be slaves. This was not a privilege but the power of rights that applied to all whites. In contrast, privilege mattered a great deal to blacks because any black could be enslaved. So, for a black man to be a free man, that was a matter of privilege. Without such privilege, he was like all the other 'ni**ers'. And there was a privilege system even among the black slaves: the House Negroes and the Field Ni**ers. While both groups were slaves, the former got access to the massuh's house, ate better, enjoyed more petty freedoms, and got more access to good stuff. Because, by and large, blacks had a subservient position to whites in the American South, privilege was a very important thing for blacks as individuals. Since they could not gain power, freedom(as a right), and full spectrum of rights as a People, they could only hope to gain advantages as individuals of privilege. Such privileges exempted them from the lot faced by most of their kind.

Fast Forward to today, and we can argue that White Privilege is indeed a real phenomenon but not in the way that 'left'(as controlled by Jewish Supremacists) would have us believe. According to the Official Narrative, ALL whites enjoy this thing called 'white privilege'. But if something is universal among whites, it's not a privilege but a power. But where do you see any such? Whites are divided as 'liberals' and 'conservatives'. Denied the identity of race/heritage/culture, whites seek meaning only through ideology of 'libertarian individualist conservatism' vs 'radical collectivist progressivism' OR idolatry(or 'idology' as fusion of ideology and idolatry) for the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. White elites disdain the white hoi polloi, and increasingly the white masses hate the white elites.
Also, the Official Dogma of New Jewish-ruled America says that Whiteness is at best problematic and at worst downright evil. Whiteness is the Mark of Cain, a human stain, and the original sin of creation(not unlike Nation of Islam's theory about how whites were grafted from the black race). Whites must feel guilt, whites must atone, whites must feel shame, whites must surrender their lands, whites must surrender their jobs & wealth, whites must kneel & sob, white wombs must be sexually colonized by blacks, white soldiers must fight, kill, and die for Jewish Supremacist crusades, and etc. In other words, whites must live for the Other, not for their own kind. White Power is evil. White Unity is cursed. White Identity is wicked. White Anything is suspect.
Then, there is nothing to unite whites together. There is no intra-universality among whites that binds them together against the Other. Indeed, whites must especially cuck and apologize because they still happen to be the richest people in the world, mostly the result of past White Evil, Greed, Rottenness, and Wickedness. And of course, White 'liberals' and progs are onboard with such worldview, not least because they were raised by the 2 PC's: Pop Culture and Political Correctness dominated by Jews — over the years, Pop Culture and Advertising have become overly politicized by capitalist elites trained by 'cultural marxists' in colleges who spread the notion of 'cultural hegemony'; as these elites no longer believe in communism, they use the capitalist means of marketing to spread the 'idology' of Jew-worship, homo-worship, Negro-worship, and Diversity Cult. (Some radicals and blacks say 'white liberalism' is also a form of white supremacism, and there is a kernel of truth in the claim in that 'white liberalism' could only arise from a state of white supremacism. It was the supremacist position of whites that made some whites drop their guard, grow more generous & conscientious, be less tribal & warlike, and be more critical of their own kind. They could risk such magnanimity because they took white power, security, wealth, and well-being for granted, even as a permanent state of being. Indeed, is it any wonder that some of the biggest virtue-signaling 'white liberal' types tend to live in nice areas with plenty of money and security? If a whole bunch of black savages were coming to rape and pillage them, they would change their tune sooner than later. So, even as 'white liberalism' denounces white supremacism, it exists only as a product of white domination over other races. Whites gained such power and success that a large portion of them could drop their natural guard, ignore their tribal instincts, and put on do-goody airs toward the Other that was seen as helpless children. It's like humans in a state of nature do not feel generous toward animals that are seen as rivals; it was only when modern man gained absolute supremacist dominion over the natural world that humans began to wax poetic about fauna and flora as something that needs protection. Environmentalism is the product of human supremacism over nature. Living in the state of nature, mankind's main worry would be to survive other animals than to help them survive the impact of humans.)

Because whiteness is now so degraded and demeaned, there is no advantage to white identity, white unity, and white continuity as building blocks for white power. In the American West, all whites united to fight the Indians and conquer/settle the lands. In 19th century South Africa, whites of all kinds banded together against blacks. (Back then, whites easily made up 50% of the sparsely populated region.) It was about White Power, not white privilege. All whites of different stripes and backgrounds were united in their identity and purpose. Even though they created social orders in which whites had advantages and rights over others, the rules applied universally to all whites. Whites didn't need privilege because they insisted on the unity of power. It's much the same among Jews in Israel and West Bank. Jews don't need special privileges because they got the power. ALL Jews are favored over ALL Arabs. If anything, it is the Arabs who rely on special privileges(granted by Jewish Supremacists) if they are to avoid the fate of most Palestinians. It's like some Chinese and Hindus collaborated with the British Imperialists for special privileges. Whereas all whites belonged to the dominant race and had their rights secured under the Imperial Law, Hindus and Chinese needed special privileges to enjoy better positions in the Order.

Given the current reality where whiteness is as reviled as Jewishness was in National Socialist Germany, whites better rely on privileges to have it so good. Whereas blackness, Jewishness, and homo-ness are innately holy according to the New Order, whiteness is fake, vile, venal, ugly, hideous, and evil. As whiteness sucks so bad, it can hardly be used as an organizing principle, unifying force, matter of dignity, or point of pride. In other words, 'white' is the 'new ni**er'. Since being white is a great moral, historical, political, social, and spiritual disadvantage, it makes no sense to aspire toward White Power that might unite all whites as one race with shared destiny. In other words, there can be no intra-universal truth to whiteness. The ONLY THING all whites must share is guilt and shame about whiteness. When it comes to celebration, it must be about homos; when it comes to awe & fever, it must be for blacks; when it comes to reverence & obedience, it must be for Jews.
In such an Order where whiteness is just a ticket to hell, white individuals need privileges more than ever as exemptions from collective punishment. White Privilege is like buying indulgences, once a common practice in the Catholic Church. So, in that sense, we do live in a world of White Privilege. This privilege doesn't apply to all whites as privilege can never be universal, not even intra-universal. Privilege always applies to select individuals or a small inner-group, not to an entire population, even if it is generally advantaged over another population. For example, there were dirt-poor white farmers in the American South who were materially worse off than House Negroes on big plantations. The advantage they had over blacks was not a matter of privilege but power.

Back then, white power mattered. Today, nothing is excoriated more than the notion of whiteness + power or whiteness + identity. It's NOT okay to be white. When power is disallowed, privilege is the only game in town. If your people have been condemned as a whole, then forget about Power. Just seek privilege as a white individual, or as an individual virtue-signaler who is eager to secure one's privilege by ho-de-do-ing that you are working oh-so-very-hard to expunge yourself of the evils of 'racism' and 'white supremacism'.
Then, it's no surprise that today's white elites are all about privilege, not power. When it comes to power, they recognize Jewishness, blackness, and homo-ness as the only identities/qualities deserving of it. Whiteness deserves no power, and white lands and white wombs must surrender to the Other. Still, white individuals want success and money, and since they can no longer rely on White Power, they must go for White Privilege, an advantage that, far from applying to all whites, applies ONLY TO those whites who can afford to pay indulgences to the 'woke' extortion industries. So, all those multi-national corporations, including Chick-Fil-A(now more like Dic*-Fill-Ass), go out of their way to appease the Wokextortionists or Woktortionists to gain favor as good House Honkeys or Corpo-Cucks. Jeff Bezos and Jack Dorsey are super-duper-rich, but they don't have white power. Just white privilege. Of course, they don't care as long as they got theirs and the approval of their 'moral superiors' made up of Jews, blacks, and homos. They are happy honkucks.

Still, the crucial point is what they got is privilege, not power. They got privilege by cuck-collaborating with the real power of Jews, blacks, and homos. This state of affairs illustrates how power isn't just about money but about prestige. A House Negro could be far better off than some Po' White Trash, but the latter was a free man who could take his freedom for granted. No matter how poor and 'trashy' he may be, he couldn't be enslaved by the richest white plantation owner. But even the fanciest House Negro eating well and living in the Massuh's Mansion could lose his privileges overnight and be sent to pick cotton. So, even when the House Negro is materially well-off, he wasn't free and actually had less power than even the lowest Po' White Trash. In a way, the likes of Tim Cook and Bill Gates understand this. They are mega-rich and got more money than they could ever hope to spend, but they got no power because they are white. They can pour tons of money into various ventures and causes but never for the power of their race. If anything, to keep their privileges, they must pour vast sums into causes that do harm to whites while expanding the power of Jews, Negroes, and Homos.

So, we are indeed living in the Age of White Privilege. When Power is banned, all you can strive for is privilege.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lSNArbFnPxgW/

White Folks and Their Fascinating/Exasperating Submission to Negro as Id and Superego

https://www.simplypsychology.org/psyche.html

What is the id?
The id is the primitive and instinctive component of personality. It consists of all the inherited (i.e., biological) components of personality present at birth, including the sex (life) instinct – Eros (which contains the libido), and the aggressive (death) instinct - Thanatos. The id is the impulsive (and unconscious) part of our psyche which responds directly and immediately to the instincts. The personality of the newborn child is all id and only later does it develop an ego and super-ego.

The superego's function is to control the id's impulses, especially those which society forbids, such as sex and aggression. It also has the function of persuading the ego to turn to moralistic goals rather than simply realistic ones and to strive for perfection.
The superego consists of two systems: The conscience and the ideal self. The conscience can punish the ego through causing feelings of guilt.

Why are white psyche and white ‘physiche’(the psychology of physicality) so chained to and slavish before the Negro?

Part of the problem is blacks have come to represent both the Id and the Superego(or SuperNegro) among white folks.

1. Blacks as Id.

Because blacks are wild, expressive, colorful, and ‘vibrant’/violent, many white folks(and other non-black folks, be they Asian, Muslim, Mexican, or Hindu) look to blacks to express what is repressed, restrained, or relatively lackluster(or 'lame') within themselves. So, a ‘bland’ and ‘generic’ proggy white girl may listen to Tina Turner, Beyonce, or Rihanna and feel her own inhibited sexuality & angst expressed through the less inhibited Negress’ shamelessly lascivious performance. It's like Jungle Therapy. Because the ‘white bread’ girl hasn't the sheer intensity of vocality, personality, and temperament to express her own sensual desires and natural drives so aggressively and nakedly, she identifies with the propulsive Negress as shaman-medium for her overly tamed and civilized whims and limbs. Because it comes naturally for the Negress to act wilder and nastier, she serves as a kind of Negro-electro-amplifier for the emotions of the white woman that simply cannot charge up to that level of hyper-funky-dynamism.

Among white males, there is a vicarious Negro-for-a-Day thrill in watching black athletes dominate the field because black male-athletic prowess leaves the white kind in the dust. Blacks can run faster, jump higher, dodge better, punch harder, and etc. So, a white guy, brown feller, and yellow boy may look to the Negro as the most potent purveyor of the Global Male Id. In any local high school, the top athlete serves as the idol of manhood in the community. In the global community, the victorious Negro has become the idol of manhood for all the world. As white manhood and especially Asian manhood have been degraded by comparison, white men are increasingly moving into cuck mode and Asian men are moving into pussy-boy mode. When whites in lived their own world and favored local heroes, white people could have white heroes. Consider a movie like CHARIOTS OF FIRE. And when Japan was closed off to the world, it has its local native heroes as top samurai swordsmen and sumo champions. But in global open competition, local/national heroes are easily blown away. It's like all dogs will lose to greyhounds in sprinting, and all dogs will lose to pitbulls in fighting.
Though all males have the masculine Id or male animal drive, it is manifested most loudly and aggressively among blacks, as when Muhammad Ali KO'ed Sonny Liston and howled he’s the ‘greatest’. In the 70s, the soccer world looked to Pele as the greatest idol of the game. Even in nations with no standing in world soccer, young boys grew up looking to Pele as some kind of sports god.

So, there could be a kind of global Id Addiction to or Id Worship of the Negro. Especially because the electronic-globo-world culture is so sports-pop-music-sex-porn-obsessed, many non-black women look to and imitate black women as the model of the most bodacious purveyor of the Id. Consider the success of Beyonce, Rihanna, and Nikki Minaj of the twerking-big-butt-school. So many white girls want to be like them.

And among non-black males, their less robust and rambunctious manhood channels the more aggressive, domineering, and violent Id of the Negro who can howl the loudest as rapper, who can sack the quarterback hardest as defensive lineman, and who can hump the most women as mandingo-man.

The Negro-as-Id phenomenon is surely manifested in the 'cuckolding' community where white men invite black men to hump their wives or girlfriends. Thus, white men partake of the bigger and stronger Id of the Negro who be humping da white ho wid gusto. Negro guy becomes the fantasy-extension of the white guy's Id. The white guy plays both biological slave to the Negro(as biological master) and fantasy Negro(as he identifies with the Negro doing his woman[who is sure to leave him sooner than later as no woman can for long respect a cucker]). As sexuality is about domination, people may find pleasure as either master or slave or as both. This is why so many white and Jewish homos go for black men, though white homos also, at times, bugger black men who usually bugger them, which makes the ‘sexual’ dynamics more complicated. The interesting aspect of homo porn(if one has the stomach for it) is that the ‘politics’ of sexuality is far more confused and ambiguous, and this may explain why homo artists/thinkers like Pier Paolo Pasolini, Yukio Mishima, and Michel Foucault made for interesting theorists of power. Though there is the female dominatrix(and recent feminist encouragement to ‘peg’ the men), the male-female sexual dynamics is far simpler, with men as dominant master and female as submissive slave. In contrast, the homo who is buggered as the ‘bitch’ can turn around the bugger the buggerer and make him the 'bitch'. In some ways, the inclusion of the Afro-homo in the Western homo community made things both simpler and complicated. Simpler in the sense that the Negro homo, being more muscled and bigger donged, was more easily recognized as the dominant partner while the white homo was relegated to the ‘bitch’ role. Even so, whereas a white woman cannot screw a Negro man, a white homo can still screw an Afro homo. So, among interracial homos, even the ‘bitch’ slave can bugger the dominant master who can play the ‘bitch’. Though Andrew Sullivan and Milo Yiannopolous are hardly important thinkers, their interracial homo-eroticism may have made them a bit keener about the various shades of power politics. The sexual ambiguity of Camille Paglia certainly accounts for her dual perspective on sexuality, watching through both male and female gaze.

Anyway, given the hedonistic Id addiction to blackness among white folks in US and EU(and among Japanese who are into Jungle Fever and among Chinese who worship black NBA players), the West may be helpless in its sensual-slavery to the Negro and too blind to wake up, come to its senses, and realize that Negromania is fatal to civilization. There is a reason why Odysseus ordered his men to tie him to the pull of the ship. Under the mesmerizing power of the Sirens’ song, he was willing to abandon everything and steer toward the femmes fatales even though he knew it meant sure death.

Emanuel Macron under the Id Power of the 'Groids'. The leader of France, the second power of EU, welcomes Negroes as Sensual Liberators and promotes Jungle Fever and ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs.

Emanuel Macron, the Wonder Boy of Globalism, cheers as the Afro-French Soccer team wins the World Cup. As athletes are demigods of current culture, white Frenchmen now worship Negroes as the superior god-race. Macron plans to bring 150 million black Africans to France to impregnate all white wombs while white men are reduced to cucky-wuck status.

2. Blacks as Superego.

Because America dominates the world with media-academia-news-entertainment, its particular brand of Guilt Cult, Iconography, and Redemption Narrative defines global morality. What America feels guilty about, the rest of the world is also made to feel guilty about: The Imperialism of Guilt. What American reveres or worships, the rest of the world is made to revere or worship. After all, American stories, passions, and hangups are beamed to all corners of the world. So, if white Americans feel pangs of guilt about a handful of dead blacks, that matters more than 100,000s or even millions of dead victims in other parts of the world. To an extent, White Guilt is a form of White Power. Even though it burdens whites with the paralysis of guilt, it also burdens the rest of the world with particular white passions for redemption and atonement(even though the world had no part in white ‘historical crimes’). If whites feel sorry about Topic A, the rest of the world is made to feel sorry as well. This is why Negroes especially have gained so much from White Guilt. As US is a global super-soft-power as well as super-hard-power, its narratives and iconography are never just its own but beamed to all people around the globe. If whites feel guilty about Negroes as a sacred people, then the whole world must share in the guilt... or else be derided as ‘racist’. Since whites feel guilt about Jews, the rest of the world better share in the guilt... or else they are Anti-Semites. (This is most comical when it comes to Palestinians, clearly an oppressed people under Jews. But never mind what Jews did to Palestinians. Since whites feel guilty about Jews over what happened in Europe in the Shoah, the rest of the world better share in the guilt... even if the people, such as Palestinians, had nothing to do with Shoah and, if anything, were wiped off the map by Zionist imperialists). Especially because Jews dominate media and academia, they've promoted White Guilt vis-a-vis blacks as one of the great sins(next to the Holocaust) in order to paralyze white power and make it subservient by way of moral blackmail.

As a result, the deification of MLK and Mandela became central(and even mandatory) to global morality. Under such barrage, one might think no people other than blacks-under-white-rule(and Jews of course under goy Christian rule) suffered so horribly, overcame tragedy so nobly, and deserve all of our sympathy in all their transcendent splendorousness — never mind all the black brutality against blacks and Arab enslavement of blacks.
In truth, black Americans throughout the 20th century were generally better off and safer & securer compared to countless peoples around the world. Of course, the US was discriminatory toward blacks, but black-American experience in the 20th century could hardly be compared with true horrors in other parts of the world. Consider the death tolls of Armenians, Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, Chinese, Algerians, East Timorese, Cambodians, Kurds, and etc. And recently in Syria and all because Jewish-supremacists must get things their way.

But because the Jew-run US narrative dominates the world, MLK became a world figure and the 'plight' of black Americans(though piddling compared to true horrors suffered by other peoples in the 20th century) was hyped as one of great 'global' tragedies. And never mind all the dead Iraqi, Syrian, and Palestinian children as the result of Wars for Israel. Just wax tragic about Emmitt Till for the umpteenth time. (To be sure, it also owed to the Cold War in which the Soviet Union and its agents exaggerated the race problem in the US to make Capitalist America seem like an especially evil place.)

And even though blacks in South Africa had it much better than blacks in black-run African nations, Apartheid was made out by the Jew-run and cuck-managed Western Media to be one of the most evil things in history. (Never mind that the South African largess never would have been created under black rule.) If whites feel bad about something, it must be truly bad because white emotions count for more in a media-world that emphasizes whiteness to the hilt as both agency and scapegoat. If whites are glowing over something, it must be especially glow-worthy. If whites are crowing about something, it must be especially crow-worthy. (In contrast, most Americans and much of the world still know little or nothing about Nakba and the Occupation of the West Bank. After all, Jews control the Western Media as main source of world news.) Anyway, because of the cult of Negro Nobility and sanctimony around MLK and Mandela — when Negroes playact as 'noble' and uplifting, they come across as more eloquent & inspirational than most races because of their booming voices or Morgan-Freeman-like folksiness — , white people have come to look to Negro as the gatekeeper of higher morality, the holders of the key to heaven. For many whites, the Magic Negro might as well be god hisself. Indeed, for most whites in both US and EU, it is more blasphemous to badmouth MLK or Mandela(or even Morgan Freeman and of course holy homos) than God or Jesus.

The Negro celebrated as Id and worshiped as Superego.
So, there you go. We have a paradoxical situation where whites look to Negroes as both revelers of the Ultimate Id and torchbearers of the Ultimate Superego. Negro revered as both savage beast and spiritual icon.

Such deranged White Delusions are now at the center of globalist morality and culture.

Of course, white elites don't suffer physically(not yet anyway) from the consequences of this delusion because they have money, privilege, and safe spaces. People like Emanuel Macron, Theresa May, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden have it made no matter what happens. They rub shoulders only with fancy Negroes like Obama who know how to push the buttons and milk White Psychology. They reside in their own Elysium world. Elite scum integrate with the creme-de la-creme of Diversity while the native hoi polloi must deal with the sewage of Diversity. It’s so easy to rant against ‘racism’ if your kind need only integrate with fancy Negroes while poor whites must integrate with the likes of Mike Tyson.

In the long run, the spread of blacks and black influence in the culture-at-large will be the fatal undoing of the West. But whites are too blind to understand this because of their addiction to Negro Id and Negro Superego. On the animal level, they cower as beta-dogs before the masterful Negro as alpha-wolf. On the spiritual level, they kneel in atonement as guilty whites before the Magic Negro as black jesus. Because of this racial-sexual-spiritual complex, it is very difficult for whites to think skeptically and rationally on the matter. Both animal emotions and spiritual passions override criticality, evidence, sense, and logic.

If current trends continue, the White Race will be destroyed by the black fist, black dong, black booty, and the black holler as it gazes up at MLK and Mandela as god-angels at the gates of heaven. Also, even as blacks beat up and humiliate whites in schools and streets, whites will be too busy cheering for black athletes to realize that black physicality isn’t their dream team but their doom and gloom..

What is the current condition of the white race? Just imagine the white race as Milo with a Negro dong up his bung as he bitches that Democrats are the 'real racists' because MLK, the black moses and jesus rolled into one, was for the "content of one's character" and salvation of all of humanity through black magic.

Identity-over-Ideology(esp if masked with pseudo-universalist-values) beats Ideology-over-Identity — Why did Jewish Ashkenazim prevail over Anglo-Episcopalians despite Comparable IQ? — Why Jews beat Whites on the Issue of South Africa

One of the biggest truths of modern history is that those who favor ideology-over-identity will lose to those who favor identity-over-ideology. Those who choose blood over ink will prevail over those who choose ink over blood. Now, everyone has some identity and some ideology. The question is a matter of which goes on top. Among whites, it used to be identity first, ideology second. Now, it is ideology first, identity second. Or it's idolatry first, ideology second, and identity last? Idolatry of worshiping the Holy Three of Jews, Homos, and Negroes. The ideology of DIOS or 'diversity is our strength' and 'white guilt'. And last and also the least, white identity. In contrast, Jews and blacks put identity before ideology. Also, they celebrate the idolatry of worshiping themselves over the Other. Jews elevate and disseminate the image of Jews as Holy Holocaust People and Happy Humor People. Negroes elevate and lionize themselves as the superior badass people who win in sports, pop music, fighting, and sex. Blood is stronger than ink, seed is stronger than creed.

Indeed, we can see the results of identity-over-ideology vs ideology-over-identity in recent US history(as well as in South Africa or any other part of the world). Two highly intelligent and talented groups have been Ashkenazi Jews and Anglo-Episcopalians. Studies show that both groups have equal intelligence, generally one standard deviation above the American average. Some estimates even suggest Anglo-Episcopalians may have slightly higher IQ than the Ashkenazi Jews. So, given parity in intelligence and talent, the two groups should have been neck-and-neck. Or the Anglo-Episcopalians should have had the advantage since they are Christian and share race and religion with the white majority population, among whom Anglo or Northern European stock has been prominent. But since the end of World War II, Jews kept gaining while Anglo-Episcopalians kept losing ground. Now, one reason could be personality. Maybe Jews have more a dogged, aggressive, and insistent personalities, the chutzpah thing. Or, maybe Jews were more adept at navigating through modernity due to greater(and more shameless) familiarity with strangeness, and indeed, the 20th century was a very strange era with so many upheavals and transformations. Due to their long history as a nomadic people who developed Zelig-ish and Houdini-like means to adapt to different nations and cultures, all the while maintaining a strong and resilient sense of tribal continuity and identity, Jews were perhaps more 'creative' in the way they played the game of modernity. After all, if there are two boxers of equal speed and ability but one is rather stiff while other is fluid, the latter will have the advantage. Shamelessness was part of the fluidity that allowed Jews to take control of vice industries that, though disreputable(at least initially), made Jews a lot of money in stuff like gambling and pornography. Also, this strange fluidity served Jewish Identity well because hostile identity had to be camouflaged with hopeful ideology. Jews couldn't have won over goyim if they'd insisted on their identity alone. Imagine if Jews said, "We are so proud to be Jewish and want you goyim to do the bidding of us Jews." Even the biggest Philo-Semites would have been offended by such presumption and arrogance. So, Jews cleverly sought power by spouting ideological talking points about 'justice', 'equality', 'progress', 'universal values', 'human rights', 'proposition nation', 'fighting hate', 'diversity', 'tolerance', and etc. By pushing such ideological themes, Jews created the impression that human progress depends on peoples all over the world suppressing their particular identities to welcome the one-and-only universal ideology. After all, identity is rooted and tangible whereas ideology is rootless and abstract. You can't immediately transform someone to another national identity(nor would you want to, that is if you want to maintain the integrity of identity), but you can quickly convert anyone to your beliefs and values.
Now, if Jewish Power led the charge with identity, goyim would have countered with their own identities. If Jews say, "We are Jewish, we are proud, and we work for Jewish power!", then goyim such as Poles would have countered with "We are Polish, we are Catholic, we are proud, and we work for Polish power!" Therefore, Jews decided to charge with ideology than identity. Jews said, "We are for justice and progress based on 'western values' and universal human rights, and if you oppose us, you're a bunch of 'racists', 'supremacists', 'xenophobes', and probably 'anti-Semites' too." This had a disarming effect on the goyim. After all, if Jews claim such noble neo-Christo-visions of bringing all of humanity under one umbrella of justice, tolerance, and understanding, why should any people say NO?
In truth, however, Jews weren't charging with ideology to serve ideology above all else. They were charging with ideology to smash goy identity so that Jewish identity could squeeze through the barriers and score the touchdown to win the game. In football, the offensive linemen do not smash into defensive linemen to score touchdowns. The offensive linemen rarely get to handle the ball. Their only role is to defend the quarterback and/or open up holes for the running back to slip through. And this is the game that Jews have been playing. They used the force of ideology as offensive linemen so that the ball of Jewish identity handled by the quarterback/runningback would slip through and score the touchdown. So, in the end, the elite competition in the US after WWII was not about Jewish commitment to ideology vs Anglo-Episcopalian commitment to ideology. It was Jewish commitment to ideology masked with ideology vs Anglo-Episcopalian commitment to ideology over identity. Well, guess who won that game? Increasingly, Anglo-elites lost their sense of identity. They even came to regard it as evil and wicked. This spread not only among Anglo-elites in the US but spread to the UK where the elites now celebrate the fact that UK will be overrun with Africans and Muslims. (To be sure, white elites seek to preserve their own status and privilege, so they don't really practice the ideology they preach. But unlike Jews, they are not using ideology as cover for identity. Rather, they use ideology to have immunity. Sticking with PC talking points buys them some protection from criticism.) Anglo-elites have chosen ideology(and immunity) over identity... without realizing that Jews pushed the toxic ideology that is now poisoning the West in order to favor Jewish identity above all else. Jews didn't push ideology over all identities. They pushed ideology only against goy identities to make space for Jewish identity(that got passover rights). So, while Anglo-American elites in US and Anglo-British elites in UK have been pissing away their land, legacy, and lineage, Jewish elites the world over have been doing everything to reinforce and strengthen Israel as a Jewish State and to turn Holocaustianity as the reigning neo-religion all around the world.


Now, who knows how the world might turn out IF all groups sincerely and conscientiously committed themselves to ideology over identity. Whatever the result may be, at the very least one could say all groups acted in good faith. But reality is never one where all sides behave with utmost honesty and highest principles. After all, why does every nation have an intelligence agency that specializes in spying, stealing secrets, planting disinformation, subverting other nations though covert means, and etc? So much for mutual trust and fair play. Or look how corporations operate. Why do they get sued? Why do they have to pay fines? Because they are often caught cheating or doing stuff to gain an edge. It's always been like that and always will be. If anything, most big corporations seek monopoly power so that they won't have to deal with competition. It's the nature of power. Then, it's the same with tribes, peoples, and nations. The idea that all peoples will be equally committed to ideology-over-identity is a pipe-dream. Furthermore, even if MOST peoples do somehow manage to favor ideology-over-identity, it only takes ONE violator to mess up everything. Suppose there are 100 people, and 99 of them act fair and honest while ONE guy exploits the 'naivete' of others to steal the entire loot for himself. Just like one bad apple can spread its mold and mess up the whole barrel, one transgressor can mess up everything. This is why libertarianism never works. It assumes that all of humanity could be persuaded to behave as principled individuals who are sincerely committed to liberty and personal responsibility, but that is fairyland. Consider how all those guys on Wall Street were preaching about 'free markets' and against government regulation, but the minute their fortunes were threatened by the crash of 2008, they were the first to run to government for bailouts and protection. And notice how they used their muscle to ensure that none of them would go to jail. Talk about professional(and tribal) courtesy. Indeed, the reason why the US is so corrupt is because it came under the domination of Jews who rose in power by pushing ideology only to favor their own identity above all else. Indeed, Jews favor Jewish identity not only above goy identities but above the ideology that they pretend to espouse. What applies to other groups doesn't apply to Jews. So, the US must sanction Iran, Russia, Syria, and any nation hated by Jews, but if any conscientious people want to sanction Israel for its Occupation of West Bank and brutality in Gaza, the hell with free speech, freedom of conscience, and universal justice: Criminalize BDS. Its Juden Uber Alles. Current Israel is more further right(often in dark ways) than any European nation, but notice the Jewish-dominated media never call it 'far right' while the label is used so often to denigrate even moderate nationalist movements in Europe. So, even the slightest sign of white/European identity or Christian consciousness(the real kind as opposed to globo-homo-infected cucktianity) is 'far right'(implying connection to Nazism) while even the most hardline Zionist extremism and supremacism is merely described as 'right-wing'.
The main reason why Jews get so triggered about white goyim in EU, US, Russia, and etc. expressing the slightest concern for whites in South Africa is because such sentiments suggest at the stirrings of white identity, i.e., whites coming to realize that they must choose identity-over-ideology for the survival and well-being of their race. Jews want identity-over-ideology only for themselves. Indeed, Jewish-dominated media even try to suppress it among black Africans. While the globohomo media have no problem with Jews doing everything possible to keep Israel predominantly Jewish, they have lambasted black South Africans for trying to stem the tide of migration-invasion from neighboring African nations like Zimbabwe(with economy worse than South Africa's due to total black rule or misrule). Jews fear that if whites favor identity-over-ideology, whites will come to favor their own identity over any other. And that means whites will put their own racial pride and racial interests above those of Jews. If that happens, Jewish Supremacism and globohomo hegemony could well end sooner than later. The utter hypocrisy of Jews is most evident in their reaction to white favoring of Jewish identity over goyim, white or otherwise. If Jews are indeed disdainful of identity(as tribal , dangerous, and obsolete), why are they so happy to see so many white people pledging their support to Jews and Israel? Isn't Jewishness an identity and isn't Israel an identitarian-state? For whites to favor Jews means favoring one identity over another. e.g. Zionists over Palestinians. If the politics of identity is so toxic and if Jews insist that whites must forsake their own racial identity, why do they also insist that whites must extol Jewish/Zionist identity and do everything in the world to serve and defend it? Why should whites favor Jews over Palestinians? Why should whites favor Israel over Syria or Iran? Why should whites favor economic sanctions on any people, nation, or group hated by Jews -- consider the sanctions on Russia, Syria, Iran, Venezuela, Palestinians, Christians who won't bend over to Homomania, white identitarians like Jared Taylor who are denied Twitter and Paypal, and etc. -- while showering Israel with billions in 'aid' every year? Why should whites get all worked up over non-existent nukes in Iran while overlooking the nukes in Israel built with uranium stolen from the US? But then, Jewish logic would have us believe that actual Jewish communist spies and subversives in the 40s and 50s were innocent victims of the McCarthyite 'witchhunt' whereas Trump and his associates are guilty of 'Russia Collusion' even though there isn't a shred of evidence and the 'evidence', as such exists, was fabricate by goons hired by the Hillary Campaign and the Deep State. Jews often deflect criticism by invoking the concept of Protected Groups. Because Jews have defined themselves as the Holy Holocaust people, they insist on Protected Status. Perversely, such protection has led to Jews becoming the New Nazis or Judeo-Nazis. It's one thing to offer special protection to weak and helpless groups. After all, it makes sense to offer protection to few remaining tigers in their natural habitat. But if tigers were plentiful and prowling the streets to devour people, should they be protected? Maybe it made sense to offer protection to the badly wounded Jewish tiger after WWII, but today, the Jewish Tiger is the apex predator, and protected status for such power is dangerous for all of humanity. Just ask the Palestinians, Russians, Syrians, Iranians, white Christians, Libyans, white Europeans, Arabs, Muslims, etc. Or, consider the twisted logic when it comes to Jews and Muslims. Jews say Muslims need to be protected in the West due to 'Islamophobia', but it was Jewish Hollywood that made all those movies that portrayed Arabs and Muslims as subhuman scum terrorists. Furthermore, the biggest tragedies that befell the Muslim World since the End of the Cold War have been due to Wars for Israel steered by Jewish Neocons and Neolibs. So, Jewish Power has done tremendous harm to Arabs and Muslims. And yet, Jewish idea of Protected Status for Muslims and Arabs has NOTHING to do with what Jewish Power is doing to those people. Rather, it's about protecting Muslims from Donald Trump and his supporters who, if anything, are more likely to oppose further Wars for Israel and want to bring US troops from the Middle East. The concept of Protected Groups has rendered justice meaningless when it comes to Jewish-and-Arab relations. If, as Jews insist, Jews and Arabs/Muslims both deserve special protection, what are we to do when Arabs/Muslims need protection from Jewish Power? After all, isn't BDS a movement that calls for special protection for the much beleaguered Palestinians from Zionist-imperialist-supremacism? But, because Jews are also protected or more-protected-than-others, Jewish greed takes precedence over Palestinian needs. The end result is the Protected Supremacism of the Jews who, posing as Eternal Holy Holocaust People, get to justify all their nasty deeds by pretending to be a 'victim group' in this day and age. Imagine Nazi Germany invading Poland and then trying to silence all international opposition by claiming Protected Status for Germany. Nazi Germany and Judeo-Nazis both demonstrate how the Cult of Victimhood can blind so many to their victimization of Others. Because so many Germans felt that their nation got a raw deal at Versailles and suffered so much during the interwar period, they regarded themselves as righteous victims righting wrongs even though they were doing wrongs to other people. And because Jews rationalize everything through the prism of 'Munich' and destroying 'new hitlers', they are blind to how they've become the new hitlers.

Identity-over-ideology will always beat ideology-over-identity. The recent history of Jews vs Anglo-Episcopalians bear this out. And it explains why Israel is proud and has healthy birthrates while Scandinavian nations are browbeaten and have low birthrates; it's because Israeli Jews put identity over ideology whereas the Scandies put ideology over identity.
Now, this doesn't mean that a people should be all about identity and no ideology. "My country right or wrong" is a terrible idea. There must be a constant effort toward shared principles of fair play, justice, and mutuality among nations, peoples, and cultures, just like individuals mustn't think in terms of 'myself uber alles'. If you did something, you need to pay the price. Even so, to an individual, his own survival and well-being come first(as long as he doesn't maliciously harm others). To a nation or people, their survival or well-being comes first. As long as a nation or people acknowledge the right of other nations and peoples to feel and act likewise, there should be no problem. The problem with Jewish Power is not universal nationalism, which is a sound idea. The problem is mono-nationalism whereby Jews and Only Jews get to enjoy the rights of nationalism while all other peoples must forsake their own nationalism mainly so that Jewish hegemonic power can systematically penetrate their nations and take control, especially with the aid of globo-homo 'gay' collaborators of every nation. (Homos around the world collaborate with Jewish Power because the spread of Jewish supremacism means homo-favoritism.) Even as Jews tell goyim to abandon their identity, Jews not only cling to theirs but practice what is essentially 'my country right or wrong'. Jewish mono-nationalism isn't a fair kind of nationalism but a gangster-nationalism where the politics of Jewish Identity is above the law and beyond reproach. Zionists occupying West Bank? Israel aiding terrorists in Syria? Wars for Israel turning millions of Arabs/Muslims into homeless nomads? Whatever happens, never blame Jews. Even though Israel is aggressor against Syria, the cuck-puppets in the media yammer about how ISRAEL needs to be protected from Syria. It's all so surreal, so very strange and Kafkaesque, but then, Jews are masters of strangeness. Ironically, Jews have become like the Nazis who were into 'my country right or wrong' mentality. Now, if Nazi Germans and Globo-Zionists were without power, it wouldn't matter what they think. But because Nazi Germany was a great power, its arrogance and supremacist lunacy brought the world to the brink. And now, Jewish globo-homo hegemonic power is doing much the same, spreading filth, hate, and lies all over. In some ways, Jewish globo-homo lunacy is more dangerous than Nazi lunacy because, at the very least, the Nazis were honest and forthright about their arrogance, contempt, and supremacism. Even those who admired certain aspects of National Socialism could see that it was led by real a**holes. Jewish supremacist are also monsters but notice how they pretend to be human-rightists, liberal-democracists, universal-valueists, diversitists, and etc. But boil down the Jewish stew to its essentials, and remaining salts in the pot taste like Kosher Supremacism.

Now, there is a better kind of nationalism. A tempered and moderate one where a nation, people, and culture prioritize their survival, preservation, and well-being all the while rejecting the arrogant mentality of 'my country right or wrong'. Thus, if that nation or people are known to have done something wrong, they fess up and make amends. It's like if your son commits a crime, it is only right that he should pay a fine or do time in jail. But that doesn't mean he's not your son. After serving time, you still favor him and try to help him because he's part of the family. It was this kind of nationalism that prevailed for a time after WWII. Germany and Japan were made to admit their wrongs and paid a heavy price. But they were allowed to survive and take care of their own interests. Their nationalism was okay as long as it respected the nationalisms of other peoples. Back then, the US and Europe were ruled by genuine nationalist leaders who felt a strong bond with their own folks, culture, and history.
But ever since Jews gained supremacist power in the US(that controls so much of the world through money, hard power, and soft power), the ideological coding of the West has been altered so that its goy elites would not only favor ideology over identity but abort even the mere thought of white identity within the white womb. And yet, this ideology was bogus because it wasn't molded out of good will and reciprocity but to dupe goyim into dropping their own identities so that Jewish identity could slip through the weakened cracks to make the touchdown and win the superbowl of Global Power. It's like Jews want whites to surrender their guns so that Jewish-controlled institutions will monopolize all the firepower. At this point, trusting Jewish Power is like trusting a fox in a henhouse. Tails I win, heads you lose. Maybe, it needn't have been this way IF Jews, as the new elites, favored 'what is good for American people' over 'what is good for Jewish supremacism'? It need not have been a zero-sum game. But as the new elites, Jews never felt much fondness or connection with the non-Jewish majority and just focused on increasing diversity to make goyim-fight-goyim while they grab more of the loot.

People need ideology because identity alone isn't enough. But ideology must serve or revolve around identity. Just like Earth revolves around the Sun, ideology must revolve around identity. A people must be identocentric than ideocentric, just like true astronomy is Helio-centric than Geo-centric. Those who choose to be ideo-centrists will surely lose to those who choose to be idento-centrists(while feigning as ideo-centrists). That is the history of Ashkenazi Jews vs Anglo-Episcopalians since the end of World War II. So... which side won and why? Just do the political math.
And in South Africa, why are things getting worse for white Afrikaners while it's looking so up and up for Jewish super-capitalists? Jews all over the world, in the spirit of identitarianism, stick up for Monopoly-Capitalist Jews in South Africa. In contrast, whites all over the world have been made to feel that it's 'racist' and 'white supremacist' to care about white women being raped and white children being beaten to a pulp by blacks in South Africa.

'Minority Rights' means Different things to Minority Elites and Minority Underclass. To Minority Elites, it means the Right to Rule. To Minority Underclass, it means struggle for representation. Jewish Minority Overlords and Non-White Minority Underclass.

'Minority Rights' means Different things to Minority Elites and Minority Underclass. To Minority Elites, it means the Right to Rule. To Minority Underclass, it means struggle for representation. Jewish Minority Overlords and Non-White Minority Underclass.

There are different meanings to ‘minority rights’. We must ask, what kind of minority are we talking about, and what is meant by ‘rights’?

After all, both British imperialist elites and the native Untouchables were minorities in India. But whereas one minority, the Brits, was at the top, the other minority, the Untouchables, was at the bottom.

For the British imperialists, ‘minority rights’ meant the right to rule over Hindu(and Muslim) masses. For the Untouchables, 'minority rights’ would have meant the modest hope of having the same legal protections conferred upon other Indians of 'higher' castes.

A similar confusion of meaning perplexes the Current West when it comes to 'minorities' and 'rights'. After all, right-to-rule(like the Divine Rights) is light years apart from right-to-representation. One is for kings, the other is for the peons. (To be sure, universal rights flowed from elite rights. The idea of rights began at the top and gradually reached the bottom.)

In the US and UK, Jews are the ruling minority or the minority elites. (Homos also belong to this group.) But Mexicans, many blacks, and many immigrant groups are either part of the minority underclass or minority ordinary folks; they have no special power or out-sized ambitions & expectations(though blacks have out-sized egos that demand attention and adulation, the blings and glitter). Asians do better academically & economically than most other immigrant groups, but their dim sense of identity and servile attitude don't translate to much power and prestige. Even in Hawaii where yellows constitute the majority, they lack political will or cultural vigor. They are just parrots and puppets of PC emanating from Harvard and Hollywood.

So, ‘minority rights’ means different things to Jews and to other minorities. For Jews, it means the quasi-divine right to rule over US & UK and make demands & dictate policy. Old ‘antisemitism’ used to mean denial of basic rights and liberties to Jews. New ‘antisemitism’ means any kind of criticism of or challenge(no matter how justified) to the Jewish supremacist right-to-rule over goyim.
And the logic is similarly operative with homo politics. ‘Gay rights’ used to mean the tolerance of allowing homos be homo and do their own thing without persecution. Today, ‘gay rights’(or Gay Rites as the neo-religion of Homomania) means we must admire, celebrate, and worship homos as angels and even change marriage laws to appease the Great Holy Homo. It means those who mock or deride the so-called LGBTQXYZ community, culture, lifestyle, or agenda must be quarantined as being afflicted with 'phobia' and be blacklisted. (In Castro's Cuba, homos suspected of HIV were quarantined and stigmatized. In the Jew-run West, sane people who seen LGBTQ nonsense for what it is are effectively contained and blacklisted from engaging in social discourse and economic competition.) And we must even put homo regalia(or re-gay-lia) in churches. It’s as if homos have some divine right to be admired and adulated, and so, we humble folks must perform our obligatory duty to homos as our 'spiritual' superiors. In all big cities, it is virtually mandatory for all politicians and 'respectable' citizens to sing hosannas to homos & trannies and take part in 'gay pride' parades. Indeed, people mustn’t even joke about(or cringe over) something as ridiculous as Bruce Jenner calling himself 'Caitlyn' or Bradley Manning(as Chelsea) expressing joy over replacing his penis and balls with a fake 'vagina'. (In the UK, a criminal investigation is under way to hunt the man who cursed out precious Brucie.) We must laud and applaud like dumb dogs at the feet of their master.

Now, there are other minorities that also demand special favors. Blacks demand affirmative action, and Mexicans demand affirmative immigration(amnesty). But many blacks and Mexicans are on the bottom looking up. Their hope is to reach the middle. (To be sure, too many blacks just fantasize about being sports stars or rappers, goals out of reach for most blacks, but then, blacks are stupid.) But even if blacks and browns demand special favors, they won’t amount to much and will never gain elite power in the West(unless they race-mix with higher-IQ Jews, whites, or Asians). Historically, all they could hope for was equality(and then some) under the law.

In contrast, equality of any kind isn’t good enough for Jews(and homos) anymore. For them, ‘rights’ means something closer to ‘divine right to rule’. Jews are now addicted to supremacism and won't settle for anything less. The New 'Antisemitism' isn't about denying Jews basic rights(what the rest of us have) but refusing to cave to all their demands(as rightful decrees of overlords who deign to rule over us as 'sheeple').
But the current arrangement makes Jews nervous because it is natural for the masses to resent and challenge the ruling elites, especially if of another racial, ethnic, and/or religious identity. Jews are different from non-Jews both ethnically and religiously. This makes Jews nervous because they, as the current ruling elites, make natural focus of the critics of power and populist angst.

So, to morally shield their power, Jews associate themselves with minorities who are relatively powerless. (Notice how Jews rig admissions at Ivy League Schools to favor Jewish students but obfuscate this operation by making all the usual noises about the need for 'Diversity'. Jews hide behind affirmative action for blacks and browns to justify the current 'holistic' system, the main agenda of which is to favor Jews uber alles.)

Since many immigrant groups have historically arrived with little and started on the bottom), they've been pegged in the popular imagination as humble and vulnerable(like a newborn baby), indeed as if Ellis Island Blues is still the anthem of New America. So, Jews associate with immigrants as 'fellow minorities'. This way, Jewish minority supremacist power is morally sanctified in association with the 'huddled masses' of recent arrivals who presumably need protection from the native populist mobs and nationalist 'xenophobes'. By posturing as noble defenders and champions of newly arrived minority immigrants, Jewish minority supremacist elites pose with(and even as) the 'powerless' by association. It's like the desperate alliance of the minority Afrikaner minority elite and the black Inkatha Freedom Party in the twilight yrs of Apartheid South Africa. Even though whites were at the top and Inkatha party members were on the bottom, they were both minorities(racial or political) and faced the challenge of the ANC party supported by the great majority of blacks. (Inkatha Party, as the political embodiment of the historically aggressive & expansionist Zulus, found common ground with European-Imperialists who came to dominate South Africa.)

The logic behind Jewish minority uber-elite alliance with economically depressed non-white minorities(mainly browns and blacks) and scab-immigrant-mercenaries is comical if one thinks about it. (Keep in mind the British Imperialists also used Migration-Collaboration to bolster their empire. Brits used Chinese migrant-minorities in Southeast Asia and shipped tons of Asian Indians to Africa to do their bidding. It was also under British Empire that the Jewish migration to Palestine began in earnest, and we know how that turned out for the native Arabs. Today, Jews control US & EU and use mass-migrations of non-whites to alter the balance of power in the West by reducing native whites into just another minority at the mercy of the divide-and-rule master strategy of the Tribe.) Imagine if the British Imperialist Elites in India sided with the Untouchables as ‘fellow minorities’ against the ‘bigoted’ and ‘populist’ masses of Hindus and Muslims demanding national liberation and independence from alien imperialism. Imagine the gall of the British ruling minority elite making overtures to the Untouchables, the underclass minority, and claiming shared victim-hood as ‘fellow minorities’ regardless of the fact that the British minority rule as the Master Class whereas the Untouchable minority is mired in poverty at the bottom. That would have been pretty amusing. But devious as the Brits could be, they didn't have the sheer audacity of chutzpah to pull off something that ridiculous.

That said, there were times when the Brits did advance the Minority Issue to morally justify their rule over India. In Richard Attenborough’s movie GANDHI, the British ruling minority presents itself as the protective guarantors for the Muslim minority from the potentially domineering Hindu majority were India to gain independence. The Brits were "masters in someone else's home" just like Jewish globo-homo elites are currently in the West. For Jews, everything is a question of "Is it good for Jews?", and this is why Jews get hysterical when whites begin to ask a similar question, i.e. "Is Jewish power good for whites?" As far as Jews are concerned, Jews and whites must share the same premise: "Is it good for Jews?" Jews must operate to serve Jewish interests, and so must white folks. One might call it shared interest and destiny, but the same can be said for master and dog. Master and dog both act on the basis of "Is it good for the master?" Shared interest is not the same thing as common interest. In a case of common interest, both sides have autonomy and arrive at a compromise that benefits both sides more-or-less equally. In contrast, there is no guarantee of parity in shared interest. Master and slave have shared interest, but it's all about the slave serving the master. Jews and whites cooperating on the basis of either 'Is it good for Jews?' or 'Is it good for whites?' is a case of shared interest, but the former is about whites serving Jews whereas the latter is about Jews serving whites. It makes all the difference.


Thankfully for India, it had a leader of Gandhi’s caliber who was witty, shrewd, and devious enough to match wits like a lawyer with the British. (He would have made Professor Kingsfield of PAPER CHASE proud.) Too bad the West lacks such leaders with just the right combination of cleverness, will, tenacity, and resolve.
Back then, the British Imperialists claimed that India was ‘British’. Now, the bloody fools in UK, under the influence of their Jewish masters, say non-white immigrant-invaders are the ‘New British’.

Gandhi urged Indians to engage in civil disobedience until the British minority elites left. Maybe white Europeans can do something similar. A strategy of mass non-cooperation and civil disobedience until the West is cleansed of globo-homo imperialism, cuck-collaborators, and Third World migrant-invaders & African sexual colonizers doing ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs).
Since overt resistance has been banned by the PC state, whites can exert their collective will through mass non-cooperation. (Whites can start by asserting that they will no longer support WARS FOR ISRAEL and act as goons for Jewish Imperialists. Let Jews fight their own wars.) But then, so many whites have been led to believe that Diversity is sacrosanct and that restoration of nationalism is unacceptable. After all, PC reminds them endlessly that the truest expression of 'European(or Western) values' is hankering for spicy exotic restaurants and jungle fever mating with Negroes. (Interestingly enough, Brexit won in UK because of older voters, but Macron won in France especially with the older demographic, 80% of whom chose him over Marine Le Pen.)

The future of Europe will be determined by whether it can produce leaders like Gandhi, Mao, Lenin, Ataturk, Mussolini, Castro, T. E. Lawrence, Trotsky, Stalin, Hitler, DeGaulle, and maybe Putin(as fate of Russia is still uncertain). While some of those men were pathological and dangerous, they could play politics on the grandest scale. When a civilization is faced with an 'existential' crisis, it calls out for visionaries and prophets, not technocrats, paper-shufflers, and wine-sippers. Run-of-the-mill 'leaders' won’t do. The current heads of state in Europe are not leaders but spineless flunkies of globalist oligarchs(with Jews having the most power due to Moral Advantage stemming from Shoah-Worship, the reigning religion of the West; a white goy with $10 billion is richer than a Jew with $1 billion, but the latter has 'spiritual' advantage because the Shoah Cult confers holiness upon him; the material has a price tag whereas the spiritual is priceless, and Jews have priceless value due to their moral exploitation of the WWII tragedy). Just look at Justin Trudeau the Man-Child cuck of Jewish donors. Why did so many Canadians vote for such pathetic clowns? Because Jews control media & academia and have infected so many white minds with nothing but PC and Pop Culture. 'Celebristianity'(largely shaped by Jews, Afros, and 'gays' or JAG) is the neo-religion of the West.

If Europe keeps producing nonentities like Merkel, Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, Blair, Cameron, May, Berlusconi, and even Farage, it’s finished. Things are getting serious, and it will take real visionaries of wit and grit who can take the shit.
As for nationalists, the likes of Le Pen, Geert Wilders, and others won’t do. (The exception may be Viktor Orban.) They are too much part of the system(despite disapproval from the ruling elites) and unable or unwilling for bold action under current rules that are totally rigged by media, academia, and deep state. Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious man. He’s a showman and salesman, and he can’t be counted on to do much that really matters.
Also, as long as enough white people are comfortable and satiated with bread & circuses and mentally infected with PC for the time being, it's difficult to shake them out of their doldrums.
If Europe is to be saved, it will require the rise of truly remarkable individuals with the power to inspire, lead, and forever alter the trajectory of history.

Extreme times call for powerful personalities.

The threat that Europe faces is the greatest ever. Past wars and repressions were horrible, but WWI and WWII were still about white Europe. So, even after millions died, it was the same white Europe. And as bad as communism was, it didn’t change the demographics in most communist nations.
But now, things are direly different. Not only is Europe being colonized physically by foreign masses but European minds have been PC-colonized to ‘welcome’ this as a good thing, even as a 'European' thing.

We need a new set of leaders and rulers who can eradicate the mental virus from European minds and purge them of this ‘guilt’ and ‘fever’. Indeed, the task is daunting because whites welcome mass invasion not only out of ‘white guilt’ but because of ‘afro-fever’, aka jungle fever. European women are turning into sexual deserters who are offering their wombs to millions of African men who are storming the beaches of Europe. As African birthrate is 6 or 7 children per women and since EU has a policy of ‘saving’ millions of self-stranded Negroes in the sea, the demographic and sexual math for Europe is horrible.

White minds are colonized by Jewish PC, white lands are colonized by Third World mobs, white males bodies are brutalized by stronger Negro men, and white females’ wombs are colonized by Negro seeds. It is White Nakba.

In Jewish history, there were two kinds of cleansers: prophets and warriors. Prophets cleansed Jewish minds of the virus of pagan idolatry and reminded them of the Covenant with God. And the warriors took up arms to do battle with enemies of Jews. (The third kind of Jews were diplomats who used wit and cunning to negotiate with rivals, enemies, or overlords of Jews.)

Anyway, unless warriors have vision and conviction, they are mere mercenaries(or Janissaries). In order for white knights to rise, white souls must be cleansed and purged of the PC virus of guilt-and-fever.
It’s like Islam has two meanings for ‘Jihad’. One means to do physical combat against infidel, but there is another meaning that says the soul must be cleansed of infidel ideas and images.

In the present, even if great white leaders were to rise, majority of white masses will curse them and denounce them since their minds have been infected with the crazy idea that ‘racism’ is the greatest sin when, in fact, race-ism is a most noble creed and conviction.

The Irony of Jewish Moral Outrage and the Axis of Jewish Neurosis

It's all very ironic.

Zionists make so much noise about Iran(and North Korea) having the Bomb. They say everything must be done to stop Iran getting nukes. An EVIL REGIME or ROGUE NATION like Iran doesn't deserve to have the Bomb.

Well, the ironies...

1. Due to the continuing Occupation of West Bank(and building of new settlements with full approval of the US), much of the world sees Israel as the Rogue Nation. Israel has nukes, lots of them. And if any nation has been acting 'rogue' around the world, it is the US, usually at the behest of Zionists and globalists. It's amusing that the US should be accusing Syria of torture and human rights violations. Yes, the Syrian government has carried out torture, but the US did Abu Gharib. US also used extensive torture in the 'war on terror'(and has aided Jihadi terrorist elements in Syria and is still shielding such groups). And Israeli torture of Palestinians has long been documented even though Israel insists the practice has been ended.

2. Jews have often said that Apartheid South Africa was the worst nation in the world since end of WWII, but Jews overlook the inconvenient fact that its main ally was Israel(which currently enforces apartheid policies in West Bank). Also, Israel supplied South African with Atom Bomb Technology. Imagine that. Jews, who say rogue nation Iran must NOT have the Bomb, once looked the other way while Israel was funneling nuke secrets to South Africa.

3. The most closely guarded secret in the early part of the Cold War was the Bomb. In the beginning, the US was the ONLY nuclear power. Stalin desperately sought the Bomb, and he finally got it through a pro-Soviet espionage network with lots of radical Jews. Among the key players were Julius Rosenberg and Morton Sobell. So, Josef Stalin, one of the biggest killers and tyrants of the 20th century, got the Bomb thanks to certain key Jewish figures.

https://newrepublic.com/article/61271/red-dusk

When the extent of radical Jewish involvement in Soviet espionage became undeniable, the Jews in the media and academia went into hyper-drive and put the anti-communists on the ethical defensive by framing the Cold War in terms of 'Red Scare', 'right-wing fear-mongering', 'paranoid style of American politics', and etc. That way, the attention was diverted from the fact of REAL JEWISH INVOLVEMENT in espionage and the passing of nuclear secrets to the USSR. Liberal and even Conservative Jews closed ranks with leftist Jews who had betrayed the US and aided/abetted a mass killer and tyrant(whose empire stretched over all of Eastern Europe) in the worst possible way.

4. We are now living in the post-Cold-War age when Russia wants peace with the world. It has no ideology for World Revolution. And yet, Jews fear the current much-diminished Russia more than the Soviet Union of the Cold War era. Why? Because Russia is for limited national sovereignty for itself and, as such, serves as a model for other nations that also want emancipation from Jew-dominated globalism.
Why would Jews fear a Russia whose ambition is far more limited and restrained than during the Cold War? Paradoxically, limited Russian nationalism is more threatening than boundless Soviet expansionism to the Empire of Judea(or EOJ) because nationalism is the most potent force against imperialism and empire-building. Jewish power is globalist-imperialist, and Jews fear that Russian nationalism might inspire nationalism among many peoples around the world.
Current Russian 'ideology' simply amounts to Russian control over Russia. If Russia minds its own business and respects(and even supports) the sovereignty of other nations, why should Jews feel so threatened(especially when Russia has good relations with Israel)? What is wrong with each nation minding its own business and protecting(than projecting) its own national interests?
It is because national sovereignty is the most effective barrier against Jewish Globo-Homo intervention, penetration, subversion, and inversion-of-values. After all, Jewish Power is globo-hegemonist, not nationalist(except in Israel).

The current Russian example doesn't say all nations should be like Russia. During the Cold War, the Russians-as-universal-Soviets championed the Soviet model as the correct one for the entire world. Not surprisingly, many peoples around the world resisted and rejected this model(even though some peoples aspired to emulate it, usually with dire results). So, international communist revolution was bound to fail. But the current Russian-ism is not universalist(as in 'all nations should adopt the Russian model') but particularist(as in 'each nation should define its own interests and future'). Under the nationalist logic, Iran should be Iran and preserve Iran-ism. China should be China and preserve China-ism. Hungary should be Hungary and support Hungary-ism. Real blood-and-soil ideology is the best formula. It certainly works for Israel(if we subtract the problems in West Bank where Jews violate the blood-and-soil principles of remaining Palestinian territories).

People who associate Nazi evil with 'blood and soil' totally miss the point. National Socialist Germany had a sound policy with blood-and-soil. It simply meant Germany for Germans and unification of German peoples on German soil. Hitler initially took back Rhineland, part of Germany. Then, Germany united with Austria as both nations wanted it that way. They were both German peoples. And then, Hitler took Sudetenland because it was mostly German. This blood-and-soil part of National Socialism was sensible and led to greater stability in Europe. But then, Hitler began to violate the blood-and-soil principles of other nations: Czech Republic, Poland, and most fatally, Russia. And if any force rolled back Nazi imperialism(as well as Japanese imperialism and then, after WWII, French imperialism and British imperialism), it was the blood-and-soil nationalism of the native folks. Poles resisted the Germans to save their blood-and-soil nation. Russians drove back the Germans for blood-and-soil Mother Russia. Chinese resisted the Japanese based on blood-and-soil defense of China. And then, Asian, Arab, and African nations began to roll back Western Imperialism on blood-and-soil principles. So, true blood-and-soil nationalism has meant defense and preservation of one's own nation.

If anything, it is imperialism and globalism that violate the blood-and-soil principle of each nation. Hungary isn't trying to push Hungary-ism on the world. All it is saying is that Hungarians have a blood-and-soil right to their own nation. But globalist Jews say NO, your nation must be swamped with endless waves of African and Muslim 'refugees' and immigrant-invaders, and you must encourage Hungarian wombs to be colonized by seeds of non-white men, especially black Africans. So, Hungarian wombs should belong to invading races and produce kids for them than produce Hungarian kids. Invasivism is at the heart of the Globo-Homo-Zio Soros Project(that is now sold as the European Project). Globalism is for Womb Colonization, like what Spanish did to native wombs in South America on a massive scale.

Now, NO Jew would push such a policy on Israel, which by the way takes in ZERO 'Syrian' or other kinds of refugees. Jews support the blood-and-soil concept of Israel as sacred, but they denounce any blood-and-soil nationalism of non-Jewish country(even when totally defensive) as 'ugly' and 'far right'.

Now, why do Jews hate national sovereignty except in Israel? Because, with the exception of Israel, Jewish power around the world is held by minority-elites. Jewish power is 'mino-cratic' outside Israel: Rule by Minority. And for Jews to maintain their supremacism over other nations, they must deactivate nationalism, deracinate native goy identity, and promote globalism(essentially dominated by Jews and their proxies homosexuals) as the highest good. So, if you're Swedish, put Swedish ethnicity and heritage in the back-burner, and instead, wave the 'rainbow' flag in delirious worship of homos & trannies and, better yet, reject white men and instead offer your wombs to black men and have black babies.(If you refuse, you're a 'nazi' and 'racist'.) To understand this dynamics, look at the fate of George Soros in nations that restored national sovereignty. His power has been reduced or blocked. They've had enough of his penetrative, disruptive, and subversive acts masked by NGO's tagged with bogus labels of 'freedom', 'democracy', and 'human rights'. In fact, it's just globo-oligarchic greed and power-lust hiding behind nice-sounding cliches. Soros has a much easier time gaming and taking over nations without sovereignty and autonomy. But he's pushed back in nations with blood-and-soil defensive nationalism.

Anyway, the irony screams at us. Jews, who'd been most responsible for passing atomic secrets to one of the biggest killers and tyrants of the 20th century(Stalin), are now making the biggest stink about Iran and the Bomb. Also, these very Jews are freaking out about Russia when Russia no longer pushes World Revolution and global domination. Jewish Logic is incredible.
According to Jewish Logic, when Jews gave nuke secrets to Stalin the mass-killer during the height of the Cold War, it was the anti-communists who were extreme, ignorant, rabid, virulent, paranoid, fear-mongering, and crazy. (Robert Oppenheimer, a communist-sympathizer, who wanted to share US atomic secrets with his beloved USSR came to be portrayed as a saintly dissident for world peace.) But now, when the Soviet Empire is no more and Russia is ruled by a mild nationalist who upholds national sovereignty as a model for all nations, Jews are freaking out, frothing at the mouth, screaming about Russian hacking & interference, and Russian aggression. Such reaction is supposedly 'rational discourse'.
But where is the evidence of Russian aggression? Did Russia invade Iraq? Did Russia level Libya? Did Russia foment the coup d'etat in Ukraine? (Russia annexed Crimea only in retaliation of US-engineered coup, but then Crimea has historically been part of Russia.) Are Russian tanks encircling the US from Canada and Mexico? It's the Jew-run US that pushed NATO up to the Russian border and mobilized soldiers and tanks into Poland and Estonia. It's the US that used Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to pull off the coup. It's the US that cooked up lies to destroy Iraq and Libya. It is the US that worked with Saudis and Turks to aid crazy Jihadis against secular Assad who protects Arab Christians in Syria. The saying, "Jew screams in pain as he strikes you" is most apt here.

The real problem for the world is the Axis of Neurosis, mostly Jewish. The world is on the precipice of another war because of Jewish neurosis of globalist domination and hegemony. The notion that each nation should be autonomous and sovereign is anathema to Jews who see gentile nationalism as a barrier to Jewish financial, ideological, and military penetration and takeover. Of course, much of this is done with bribery. With immense wealth, Jews try to buy off the elites of every nation to collaborate with globalism than defend one's own nation. It's no wonder so many nations wave the homo flag. Want a good trade deal with the US? You have to let US imperialists plant the homo victory flag in your country. Carrots & Bribes OR Sticks & Sanctions(or even Bombs).

It makes no sense for the whole world to revolve around the Axis of Jewish Neurosis that demands that all nations bow down to Jewish supremacist interests over their own national identity and interests. Jews denounce true nationalism as 'blood and soil' so as to associate it with Nazism, but this is disingenuous because the best thing about National Socialism was blood-and-soil nationalism up to 1939, and the WORST thing about Nazism was its imperialist violation of the blood-and-soil of other nations. If National Socialist Germany had been true to the principles of blood-and-soil, it would have united only German peoples in German lands -- just like Israel sought to unite Jews from around the world in Israel. In the end, both Germans and Jews failed because they went from nationalism to imperialism. Hitler wanted more than German lands, and Jews grabbed West Bank in 1967 and never let it go. Worse, via the US(which came under total Jewish power under Clinton), the Zionists have been exerting their hegemonic ambitions all over Middle East and North Africa, causing so much havoc as a result.

Nationalism is blood-and-soil. Imperialism is a bloody takeover of other people's soils. It was when Hitler moved into imperialist mode that his project was doomed. His aggression awoke blood-and-soil rage in other nations that refused to live under the German heel. When Bismarck unified Germany, his goal was to forge German peoples in German areas into one nation. He wasn't interested in violating the blood-and-soil of other peoples; he advised the Kaiser against emulating the French and British imperialists in grabbing other parts of the world that belonged to other peoples. If Hitler had kept his nationalism on the Bismarckian level, WWII would have been avoided.

In our world, 'Russianism' means every nation should preserve itself and be itself. It doesn't mean all nations should be like Russia or imitate Russian values. It means, "just as Russia preserves Russian-ness, other nations should preserve their own unique identities and heritages." THIS is what most threatens Jewish globalists because the rise of non-Jewish nationalism in each nation means more barriers to Jewish penetration and takeover(not least with the proxies of homosexual globalists who seek to plant the homo-globo victory flag in every nation; also, when homos take over the culture of a nation, they promote the ideal of the pansy-wussy male, which undermines national masculinity that serves as bulwark against foreign threats. Europe, having been wussified, cannot even defend itself from US bullying and Muslim/African invasions. Jews want it this way).