Murder of Linda Frickey by Black Criminals and What It Reveals about the Lack of Racial Immunity for Self-Preservation & Resistance against Existential Dangers — Defeating a Nation, People, or Culture by Robbing It of the Will to Resist

Vincent James on this horrible news: WHITE GRANDMOTHER HAS ARM LITERALLY RIPPED OFF BY BLACK TEENS, MEDIA IS SILENT - The Red Elephants - Vincent James
James focuses on the reluctance of the media, especially national media, to either report the news or discuss its racial dynamics. Of course, if a bunch of white teenagers had done this to an old black woman, it'd be world news spread by Jewish-run media, and Biden would made several speeches about it, and Twitter would be lit up with a zillion comments on 'racism'. Indeed, Jussie Smollett's obvious 'hate hoax' got 1000x more sympathetic attention than this horrific news story, which is all too characteristic of the nature and extent of crime in the US. Not only are the Jewish-run media remaining mostly silent about this news story but the FBI, under the control of JAB(Jews-around-Biden), decided not to publicize crime statistics, of course for ONE REASON: Black crime, already and always so high, went through the roof as the result of the fantasy of BLM that led to the 'defunding' of the police. What is truly amazing in all this is the general white silence and wimpery. Worse, so many white dummies or whummies(even highly 'educated' ones, but then that is precisely the problem as education today = indoctrination = communion into 'woke' PC) still chant the BLM slogan or put up BLM signs on their windows and front lawns, as if doing so imbues them with spiritual righteousness — apparently, for post-religious Jaberals, their spiritual void has to be filled by SOMETHING, and when it's not the 'rainbow' sodomy, it's the myth of St. George Floyd(though, of late, Ukraine is the new crusade, but I don't see that lasting too long). However, even those who haven't fallen for the BS of BLM and Floyd Fantasy dare not speak the naked truth about blacks and crime. Even those who blame BLM for the rise in crime and deaths dare not talk about how crime is linked to blacks due to evolution and genetics. And even though blacks feel ZERO sympathy for the nonblack victims of black crime and thuggery, even anti-BLM voices frame their arguments in terms of lamentation for increased black deaths. Imagine a war in which the men of Army A are rejoicing over the deaths of men of enemy Army B, but Army B pleads to end the war because, boo hoo hoo, too many men in Army A are dying as well. Never mind their own men, for whom Army A feels zero sympathy. It goes to show that being right isn't the same as feeling righteous. Ones who are factually wrong but righteous in passion often dominate those who are factually right but defensive, apologetic, and gutless in emotion. On the eve of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia, a free market economist with better statistics and arguments would have been useless against true-believing Bolshevik fanatics. Maybe Bolshevik economic theory was based on false stats and wrong notions, but their adherents were extremely righteous in their conviction and willing to kill/die for their beliefs. So, in the absence of social and political order, the most strong-willed and impassioned were likely to come out on top.

All the correct statistics and the rightness in assessing reality are on the side of anti-BLM people. They are right in their knowledge that blacks commit the most crime, blacks routinely kill blacks, blacks also kill lots of non-blacks, and that white police 'genocide' of blacks is a total fantasy, despite the general 'liberal' belief that 10,000 blacks are killed annually by the police. They are also right in pointing out that increased police presence significantly reduce black deaths. But that's about being right, not about being righteous. It doesn't challenge the prevailing idolatry in the West that blacks are somehow sacred, that their bodies are special, their souls are nobler, and etc. Indeed, even anti-BLM voices often make their arguments in service to Negrolatry, i.e. they argue against BLM to save sacred black bodies that have been killed in larger numbers due to BLM policies. Righteousness can be founded on rightness in facts and reality but not necessarily, as facts often get in the way in the way of a narrative of heroes and villains, saints and sinners. More often than not, righteousness is divorced from rightness because emotions and spirituality often don't comport with facts and reality. It's like romance doesn't always choose the right or better person based on objective criteria. No wonder women fall for dangerous but dashing men, and men fall for femme fatales. Righteousness can be sentimental, or it can be furious, even murderous. Often, it starts as a gentle glow but then burns hot and threatens to set the world on fire. Consider how Christianity began as sympathy for Jesus the Good Man but turned into a worldwide crusade that destroyed countless pagan temples and persecuted so many as witches and heretics(and also led to countless sectarian violence). And, consider THE PLANET OF THE APES series, especially ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES where the apes in the first movie find themselves transported to an earlier time on Earth when humans still ruled. A man figures out what happened and realizes that the presence of the talking apes could begin to fulfill the prophecy whereby apekind eventually supersedes mankind as the masters of the planet. So, based on his calculations in regards to the future, the talking apes must either be killed or, at the very least, sterilized. But the movie audience, presumably all human, is likely to side with the apes despite the knowledge that the talking apes' presence threatens the future of mankind. Why would the audience feel this way? Because even though the correct 'math' is on the side of the man who sees the need to kill or sterilize the apes, the heart of the audience feels for the apes. They don't want to see the madonna ape and her baby be killed by Neo-Herod man. The movie ends with the baby ape going 'mama, mama'. So, 'mama' wins over 'math' because it feels more righteous even though the right thing to do, in order to secure mankind's future, is to kill or sterilize the apes. If the righteousness in ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES was on the level of sentiment, it turns into inflamed passion in CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES, the hero of which is the ape-baby grown into the messianic Ape Avenger. (Of course, the religious-conservative orangutan elder was also right in THE PLANET OF THE APES as to the danger posed by humans to the ape world. Still, he was better-positioned than his human counterpart in ESCAPE because the ape world was tribal, traditional, and communal in their antipathy toward humans, whereas the thinking/talking apes in ESCAPE arrive in a liberal human order that, especially in the post-WWII and Cold War atmosphere, goes out of its way to be enlightened, tolerant, and compassionate. Thus, if the orangutan elder served the general will of the ape order, the human 'villain' in ESCAPE must act on his own against public sentiment.) Even when factually wrong, the righteous possess the drive to assert their will and go on the attack. Jussie Smollett pulled the insane 'hate hoax' because of his sense of righteousness. Being black, there's obviously more natural egotism, but our culture instills blacks with angry righteousness via academia, media, and official pronouncements. Indeed, the Civil Rights Movement narrative now counts for more than all other events in US history, and MLK is deemed greater than all great white historical figures combined; his only rivals are Harriet Tubman and George Floyd. For the righteous, it doesn't matter if something is factually correct or incorrect. What matters is they are on the 'right side of history', on the side of angels, and/or war with the demonic(as currently defined). So, stuff like facts are secondary to the cause, the agenda, the crusade. If facts are inconvenient, ignore them. If lies are useful, use them. As righteousness trumps all, reality exists to serve one's sacral vision of the world. It's like biology is a mere inconvenience to a tranny who insists he's a woman. As globo-homo has been sacralized, the homo or tranny's feelings are next-to-godliness, and reality must take a backseat to the passion of globo-homo. Likewise, no matter how many 'hate hoaxes' are exposed for what they are, the phenomenon continues because they aren't about facts but the faith of Negrolatry, Globo-Homo, or Jew-Worship. So, even when the latest 'hate hoax' is factually shown to have been the work of some lowlife Negro, Homo, or Jew, what matters is that it was for a good cause, to push the holy narrative, just like the Catholic Church, knowing full well that miracle sightings were bogus, pretended otherwise to keep the flock faithful. Such mentality now affects the entire media, even academia. Not that journalists and scholars aren't interested in facts and details, but they believe that the holiest of the holies are Negrolatry, Globo-Homo, and Jew-Worship, and therefore, even falsehoods that prop up the idolatry and narrative are preferable to facts that belie them. But then, there's another trick, that of 'prestige'. The establishment media and academia posture as being rational and factual by abusing their brand to dismiss any inconvenient fact, data, or idea/theory as 'discredited', thus persuading the less knowledgeable that certain things have been rejected by SCIENCE. New York Times uses its prestige to repeat over and over that Charles Murray's Bell Curve theory has been 'discredited' but without showing any scientific proof. For many people, official prestige is enough to sway them. (By the way, Murray is a perfect example of the weakness of rightness in the face of impassioned righteousness, like at Middlebury College. He may be right about lots of facts, but he's bloodless and passionless about his knowledge. At times, he's even defensive and lamenting, like Robert D. Putman who wrote BOWLING ALONE. Both scholars operate on the basis of, "I wish it wasn't true, but it is." It's impossible to be righteous with the right data with such wussy attitude. If rightness is to prevail, it must also be righteous and grow a pair.)

As a matter of factuality, BLM is a lie, which means policies based on it are nonsensical, and as such, they can only do harm as reality is willfully misunderstood and mishandled. It's like misdiagnosis in medicine can be harmful, even fatal. Imagine a lung cancer patient being ordered to smoke more as a cure. (Just think of what the lies about Covid-19 did to the world.) Despite all the lies, so many people in the US still chant BLM slogans and even put up BLM signs. They are saying and living the lie, but they do it anyway because they feel righteous. In contrast, even though anti-BLM people are on firm ground as far as reality is concerned, they are anxious or afraid to speak the truth. A few may defend the police and even put up support-the-police signs, but virtually NO ONE in the US puts up signs saying BLACKS MURDER BLACKS, BLACKS RAPE WHITES, BLACKS ATTACK NON-BLACKS, etc., all of which are infinitely truer about reality than the fantasy of BLM. Furthermore, any sane person should know by now that BLM policies led to even more black deaths, but BLM still remains the righteous position whereas critics of BLM are still apologetic about the truth. 'Black Lives Matter' is like China's 'Great Leap Forward', which was actually a great leap backward. More black lives were killed as the result of BLM, but such facts are secondary to the righteous rage of 'social justice' where blacks are saints and whites are demons. But white people weren't always this way. They used to be rationally race-ist and have a far more realistic assessment of group differences. Sure, there was also more bigotry of the stupid sort, the gratuitous nastiness of a**holes, but there was also a good deal of common sense, as well as a sure sense of white worth, white pride, European heritage, and historical meaning, all of which kept whites believing that they were of a race, culture, and civilization worth preserving and defending, even expanding. Fast forward to today, and many whites feel as though they're diseased with a 'sinful' and 'racist' identity that must be expunged somehow. There are still many whites feel otherwise, but even many of them lack the guts to stand up and speak up for their race. Furthermore, despite their lack of white self-loathing, they tend to give special consideration to Jews and blacks over their own kind, as if they feel they must prove they are not 'racist'. It's like Donald Trump relied heavily on white support but was always yammering about how his policies are so great for Jews and blacks. All of this is a powerful demonstration of the effect of undermining resistance in a people. It's like a person with severely compromised immunity can fall seriously ill or even die from a mild disease. A healthy person's body fends off all sorts of germs, even the nastiest ones, but an unhealthy person can succumb to even the common cold or mild case of flu. For him, it could be totally debilitating or even fatal.

Jews understand this very well. One way to destroy a powerful system is to assemble a powerful counter-force and go on the attack. All throughout history, a powerful domain was defeated by an even more powerful domain. In World War II, it took the combined might of UK, US, and USSR to destroy the powerful Nazi Germany, which had been unified into a powerful industrial fighting force. It's like it takes a powerful boxer or wrestler to defeat another powerful boxer or wrestler. To amass a powerful force and hurl it against another powerful force is no easy feat. It's like it's nearly impossible to fell a tree with one blow. So, what did people do through the ages? They took an ax and slowly chipped away at the tree. Then, when enough of the tree was chopped away at the base, it would fall from its own weight. Just leave it up to gravity. Indeed, no matter how big and powerful someone is, anyone(even a child or old lady) could beat him if he was debilitated by drugs or disease. It's like naturalists in the field can work on bears, lions, rhinos, and other dangerous animals once they'd been tranquilized. White America used to be united and powerful. What made it so? Racial consciousness, historical sense, pride of achievement, sense of community, and spiritual conviction(that its faith was the best one). There was no chance that Jews or any people could bring down such a power. Politically, economically, technologically, and militarily, the White West was the most powerful entity, invincible as a united force. Nothing even came close. Yet, even if it couldn't be beaten from the outside, it could be weakened from the inside. Anti-whites could enter into institutions and rewrite the laws. They could enter the academia & media and alter the narratives and idols/icons. They could use entertainment and leisure to make the white masses prioritize hedonism and decadence over morality, family, community, and nation. They could take over medicine and promote all sorts of drugs on which people become dependent. They could use education and communication to instill whites with feelings of 'guilt' and 'sin'. Information and Media could also be used to promote non-white, anti-white, Judeo-centric, Afro-centric, and/or homocentric idols/icons and narratives over pro-white, normative, and Eurocentric ones. Also, language and terminology could be used to turn certain words into incantations and truisms that were to be accepted as 'self-evident' than debated. "Diversity is our strength, diversity is our strength..." or "black lives matter, black lives matter", "white supremacism! white supremacism!" "Migrants Welcome, Migrants Welcome", ad infinitum.

Over time, despite still being the dominant majority in the West, despite having suffered no military invasions, despite continuing to hold lots of wealth, and despite having lots of people with talent, the White World came to be near-fatally weakened on the tribal, racial, communal, moral, spiritual, and national level. Forget about European pride when you've been told that a recently arrived Arab or African is just as 'European' as a European(if not more so) with ancestry going back 10,000s of yrs. Never mind racial unity when 'racism' is the greatest sin, and 'white racism' is the worst of all 'racisms', especially against blacks even when blacks act like thugs and louts. Forget about community when individualism is all that matters; your hedonism and pleasure matter more than family and society. Besides, if a community must be formed, it has to be around stuff like globo-homo or BLM as any theme with the slightest hint of being pro-white, genuinely Christian, or truly European is anathema in the Current Year. And what is morality when right-or-wrong is a matter of mindlessly praising and serving Jews, blacks, and homos? And forget about spirituality in a world where churches fly the homo flag or care more for the Negrolatry of George Floyd than about God and Jesus. With the White World degraded to such level, forget about nationalism. What nation is left to save or defend? It's been said the US defeated the Soviet Union without firing a single shot in the Cold War. World War III was averted but US nevertheless won over the communist system. Actually, this isn't really true. Soviet Union defeated itself because communism wasn't a workable system in the long run. Even if there had been no Cold War and even if the US and USSR had just ignored one another, USSR would have lost anyway(even without US hostility) because the economic system was too confused and inefficient, and without incentives. Soviet Union defeated itself, but the US took the credit. Imagine if someone you hate drinks himself to death, but you take credit of having beaten him. In contrast, the defeat or the fall of the White World is truly amazing. Unlike the USSR that practiced a deeply flawed economic system, white people in Europe, Canada, and the US had everything, most of them right. They had freedom and democracy, they had capitalism, they had social safety nets(a bit of socialism), they had national identity and pride, and lots of other things that make society work. And yet, whites have become increasingly defenseless against problems and challenges that should have been obvious to the naked eye and could have been handled with a bit of good sense. The fate of the Soviet Union was the failure of failure, whereas the fate of the White West is the failure of success, i.e. people with so many good ideas and systems failing to secure and strengthen them and instead, meekly and weakly, letting themselves to be nudged, prodded, pushed, and attacked with ever more ridiculous demands.

The White West was the most powerful force in the world. So powerful that even after WWI, it dominated the world. And even after WWII, the white-dominant US was the biggest power in the world by far. (And even the Soviet Union was white.) There was no force that could challenge or defeat it. And yet, its mechanism of self-preservation and resistance grew ever more compromised from the inside. Instead of being defeated outright in the physical/material/military sense, its inner sense of worth, confidence, meaning, and value came to be eroded over time... until there was a critical mass of whites who called for the outright destruction of whiteness and whites who were too spineless to stand up and say NO. In a way, what happened to Russians and White West during and after the Cold War is like the mirror opposite. During the Cold War, the America-led West grew richer and more abundant and developed the most powerful military. In contrast, the Soviets with a far smaller economy strained to keep up militarily and couldn't even fill up store shelves with basic items. By every metric of material success, the American-led West beat the Soviet Union by a mile. But, despite all such gains in the West, there was a ceaseless decline in patriotism, national identity, cultural heritage, civilizational confidence, communal unity, and racial sense. White Americans had more, ate more, and had more fun, but they increasingly became defensive about their identity lest they give offense as 'racists'. In contrast, while material conditions worsened in Russia under late communism and then truly hit rock bottom in the 1990s, Russians never felt there was anything wrong with being Russian, that Russians were burdened with special 'historical guilt', or that they were soul-sick for their ethnicity or nationality. Even when material conditions were at their worst in Russia, Russians didn't feel bad about their history, country, culture, and identity.

In the end, who wins out? A rich man who hates himself or a poor man who likes himself? Such a rich man, for all his wealth, begins to work against himself, whereas the poor man, despite his poverty, works for himself, to build himself up. In the long run, a man robbed of his soul is worse off than a man robbed of his possessions. It's even worse if the man robbed of his soul is told that hating himself is the highest good, or the new soulfulness. White Californians had it so good. In the same period, Russians had it so bad. But today, Russia is asserting its national will and taking back historical parts of Ukraine. In contrast, white Californians, over several decades, have been unwilling, thus unable, to do anything to stop their decline and demise even though there has been no military invasion of California. While Russians were doing something about the globalist oligarchs, White Californians let Jewish oligarchs take over everything and demand and dictate as if the Golden State was their fiefdom. While Russia reasserted control of its borderlands, white Californians, once over 80% of the population, have been reduced to 35% and keep on losing. While Russia said NO to globo-homo, white Californians are always at the mercy of whatever fads and fashions pushed by Jews, indeed as if they have no minds or souls of their own. When the Cold War ended, white Californians had so much more than the impoverished Russians. But whereas Russians never felt bad for being Russian, so many White Californians had no ethnic pride or racial sense of pride left. They lost their sense of self-preservation and resistance because Jews gained the key into the control centers of the West and reprogrammed the White Mind via the academia and media with negative feelings about 'white guilt', 'racism', 'homophobia', and etc. (While the Soviet Union was also 'anti-racist', the policy didn't come at the expense of Russian-ness, which was not insulted and excoriated as being uniquely guilty. Jews pulled that number first on Germans, then Anglos, and then rest of Western Europe.) And this poison is the new white identity or anti-identity all over the West, from US to Canada to Australia to EU. Indeed, one reason why current Europeans hate Russians(and Hungarians) with such virulence is that their new identity is one of self-negation. A German believes it's wrong for a true German, a white German, to feel pride of identity. No, 'German-ness' has value only in association to 'diversity'. If a black African becomes a 'German citizen', then and only then does German identity have value. For true/white Germans, German-ness is a burden, a curse stained with Holocaust Guilt. Only when outsiders become 'New Germans' does German-ness gain value as newcomers(especially if non-white) are without Holocaust Guilt. But it's not just the Germans. Almost all Western Europeans now feel and think this way. Their national anti-identity is one of self-negation-and-abnegation, of welcoming the non-European world to take over as the New Europe.

Then, it's hardly surprising that such people would be terribly triggered by Russians who affirm their national identity and heritage and culture. How dare they? Don't Russians know that 'good whites' work to undermine their own national identity, national borders, national heritage? It's become customary in Europe to feature black actors in historical roles of Europeans. Whiteness is BAD and is made GOOD only through self-negation and cucking to others. When such mentality dominates the 'rules-based order' of the West, of course Russia proudly asserting its position and projecting its power to secure its existence and future is deeply offensive. Don't be like those barbarians! Be like the British, Irish, or White Californians whose highest notion of good is winning approval from Jews. So, Jews were very smart. They knew that the White West was mighty and impossible to defeat and take over militarily, but it could be rendered defenseless if its resistance mechanism were altered from within. Jews didn't have to fire a shot. Just get the key and worm inside to the inner workings of white institutions and media that control the thoughts and feelings of the white masses, especially true in the era of electronic media where virtually everyone's mind is tuned to the wavelength of those who monopolize key media centers. Then, why should anyone be surprised about the sickening silence surrounding the horrific murder of Linda Frickey? She's white, and whiteness is bad. Don't resist against black savagery! That's 'racist'! Gee, maybe those blacks(called 'teens') did us a favor by ridding the world of some of this shitty 'whiteness', of which Linda Frickey was a part. What a world we live in. White American cowards who don't lift a finger to protect their own from black savages and illegal invaders get all triggered over Russia finally pushing back against Jewish use of NATO as battering ram against Russia. Death Of The Jewish Pencil - Brother Nathanael

Colin Flaherty RIP — BLM = WOM, or White Obedience Matters — Why It Matters that Jews Control the Gods — Power of Sacraments & Taboos

"This Was A Man"—RIP Colin (“Crime Is the New Black Entitlement”) Flaherty, September 21, 1955-January 11, 2022 - https://vdare.com/articles/this-was-a-man-rip-colin-crime-is-the-new-black-entitlement-flaherty-september-21-1955-january-11-2022

Colin Flaherty did great work in reporting on the epidemic of black crime, but alas, he was just another useless ‘boomer’. He would usually ban any commenter on the Jewish Question or denounce anyone as ‘Anti-Semite’ who noticed the obvious. His page on minds.com was especially censorious.

Stuff like BLM(or Black Lives Matter) isn’t really about blacks. It’s about whites. Jews don’t care about black lives, anymore than they care about Palestinian or Iranian or Russian lives. Indeed, if the world had no white people, would Jews push BLM? Of course not.

It really boils down to the formula: Black Lives Matter = White Obedience Matters. Or, BLM = WOM.

White Obedience Matters to what or whom? To Jewish Supremacist Power. How can Jews maintain White Obedience? By White Guilt and White Shame, which fosters to White Submission and White Hope for Redemption.
Jews used the Holocaust Card, and it’s been very effective in Europe but less so in the US with its triumphalist pride of ‘We beat the Nazis!’ So, against white Americans, Jews use the Black Card. Again, it’s not because Jews care about black lives. Jews promoted gangster rap that encouraged violence in the black community, leading to more deaths. Jews pushed all manner of social licentiousness that led to family break down, which has been especially devastating to blacks. Also, it was Jewish Power decided to lock up record number of blacks beginning with Bill Clinton when 'inner-city' pathologies were threatening to undermine big cities and boost support for White Conservatism.

BLM is really just a tool directed at whites because Jews fear worsening conditions will begin to awaken white consciousness in search of autonomy from Jewish Authority. Jews fear white awakening like Catholic Church feared the rise of Protestantism, like the British Empire feared the awakening of Indian National Independence Movement.

Jews have been disadvantaged in Russia because they don’t have something comparable to guilt-bait Russians with. Sure, there’s the thing about pogroms, but Russians can fire back and point to Jewish role in communism that killed many more lives. Besides, Russians were the main destroyers of Nazi Germany. So, if anything, Jews owe the Russians. And besides, Russians remember what was done to their country in the 1990s by Jewish 'oligarchs'. (Furthermore, as Russian sports and popular culture are dominated by national folks, Russians are less enamored of the Other as 'heroes' and 'idols', whereas white Americans have come to idolize blackness in sports and music. No wonder then that Jews can manipulate white feelings about blacks.)

At any rate, Jewish Power ultimately depends on control of White Americans. Jews feel they must control the gods that decide what is sacred or profane in the US. This is absolutely crucial because it’s the sacraments and taboos that decide the character of a civilization. Power and wealth aren’t enough. After all, we can badmouth Bill Gates even though he’s super-rich. We can insult Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. We can also put down Mark Zuckerberg as a billionaire geek but never ever as a, guess what? A Jew!
So, being rich isn’t sacred in the West. Wealth can be attacked, and rich people can be mocked. But being Jewish is sacred. Indeed, putting down a super-rich oligarch is less dangerous than putting down a Jewish plumber. If a politician impugned a super-rich hedge-fund shark or Big Tech oligeek as a greedy a-hole, his career will remain intact. But if he muttered something negative about the ethnic traits of a Jewish non-entity, he would be in Big Trouble. It’s like the FBI and Justice Department can go after someone for being rich and corrupt but better not touch anyone or anything associated with Jewishness. So, Ghislaine Maxwell has been convicted of sex charges but shhhhhhh about her Israeli-Jewish connections.
Jewishness is like the Kim Clan in North Korea. As long as Jews control the gods in the West, Jewishness is sacrosanct. And in order to control and subdue whites, Jews also made blackness sacrosanct. Again, it’s not because Jews care about blacks but because they see the advantage of using blackness to milk ‘white guilt’. BLM is really about controlling whites. Because blackness has been sacralized, the death of some lowlife black punk like George Floyd or Arbery gets more attention than the deaths of affluent non-blacks murdered by black criminals.

If Jews care so much about human lives, why hasn’t there ever been a Palestinian Lives Matter campaign?

Look at this weasel Jon Lebovich Stewart:

JEW JON STEWART SAYS JEWS & BLACKS SHOULD COME TOGETHER & GET WHITEY

If Jews talk of Jews and blacks uniting against whites, isn’t it about time whites talked of whites and blacks(or any bunch of goyim) uniting against Jews? But, as Jews control the gods, that would be ‘antisemitic’ because Jewishness is inviolably holy. Jews can put down whites and whiteness, but no one better put down Jewishness. Jews can recycle so many anti-goy tropes of rednecks, ‘racists’, Christ-tards, and etc., but woe to anyone who dares say anything suggestive of ‘antisemitism’.

Who controls the gods is of utmost importance. Consider: In the Jewish community, you could badmouth Jesus all you wanted because He wasn’t holy among the Jews. If anything, He was much reviled and it was even obligatory to demonize him. But among Christians, Jesus was the holiest of the holy. Now, how could Jesus, a Jew who was killed long ago, exert such power over the Christian West? Why did even kings and generals bow down before Him? How come anyone could be burned at the stake or tortured horribly for having blasphemed the name of Jesus? Jesus, while alive, had no worldly power and was humiliated in the worst possible way before being put to death. Yet, He came to reign over the West as the King of kings. Why? Because He was worshiped as God.

Secularism turned out to be a fraud in most cases because so-called secularists merely sought out new gods. So, Stephen King put down the Bible and Old Religion but worshiped at the feet of some Magic Negro/Negress of his befouled imagination. MATRIX also sacralized Negroes as holy, as founts of spirituality and wisdom. All those ‘well-educated’ whites who never go to church will get all weepy at the thought of St. George Floyd and volunteer to wash stinky Negro feet. They will look upon Anne Frank as the new madonna. It’s all so tiresome.

At any rate, the human mind shall always remain ‘spiritual’, and this is why it’s of utmost concern as to who controls the gods. Jews present themselves as secular and ‘liberal’, but they are really neo-theologians and propped up ‘wokeness’ as the new faith. And BLM, along with globo-homo, is meant to be the new faith for goyim. Jewish message to all goyim is “Worship blacks and homos(whom we control and fund) above everything, even your own kind.” And it’s especially directed at whites as Jewish Power relies on white obeisance.

So, next time BLM is promoted, remember that it’s really WOM or White Obedience Matters.

BLM = WOM.

The history of India illustrates how crucial it is to control the gods. The Ancient Aryans who invaded India made sure they controlled the gods. They made themselves the Brahmins, the elite spiritual caste to revered and consulted by the rest. Thus, their authority over the brown natives wasn’t merely military, economic, or political but spiritual. Likewise, the Spanish remained as overlords in Latin America because they converted the brown natives to Catholicism. The browns came to worship the God brought to them by whites, who also dominated the clergy.

In contrast, the British ruled over India with political, economic, and military might. Spiritually, the British allowed for Hindus to remain Hindu and for Muslims to remain Muslim. So, while the natives admired and feared the British for worldly/material reasons, they didn’t look to the British as holy. Unlike the Ancient Aryans, the British didn’t make their authority SACRED in the eyes of the natives. And so, it was only a matter of time before they were expelled.

This is why Jews are so eager to control the gods, to weaken white identity and undermine Christianity. They must colonize the SOULS of goyim, especially of whites.
In Soviet Russia, Jews went about wrecking churches. In the US, Jews destroy Christianity by rotting its soul with BLM and globo-homo, whereby the faith is associated with worship of punkass Floyd and reverence for homo bung-donging. Any religion that goes that way becomes soul-dead. A religion losing its soul is worse than losing its body. After all, Jesus was killed in body but not in soul. Soviet Russia killed Christianity in body but not in soul. But under Jewish control, Christianity is turning into cucktianity where the new clergy put on globo-homo garb and praise trannies who cut their dicks off.

Jews seek to spiritually colonize white souls with globo-homo and BLM. And what’s truly shocking is how many whites fell for this. It goes to show that White Individualism was largely a myth. Whites were mostly conformist and obedient. Individualism only mattered at the top among the talented and creative. Most whites were suckers and schmucks. Just look at the Covid hysteria, especially among Anglos. What a bunch of cuck-tard conformists.

US is a ‘liberal democracy’ in name only. It’s a mere shell. At its core, it’s an Ethno-Oligarchy. Even if we can’t do anything about Jewish supremacist power(for the time being), we need to see it for what it is. US is a Jewish Ethno-Oligarchy, an empire of lies. And despite all the Jewish-fomented crises since 2000, things will only get worse unless the Jewish Power is named and outed for what it is. The key motivating factor behind so many recent disasters was insatiable Jewish Supremacist greed and ethno-mania. Jewish Power will never stop unless it is called out for what it really is.

If Jews bitch about ‘antisemitism’, it needs to be pointed out that their behavior gives most credence to ‘Anti-Semitic’ tropes. With so many lies spread by Jewish Power, it’s only a matter of time before people begin to question the Holocaust. If Jews lie so brazenly about so much, who's to say they didn't lie about the Shoah as well? Should we trust Jews on history when they pushed the Russia Collusion Hoax, Covid Hysteria, and BLM bullshit?

PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY JEWISH ZIONIST WARS | WHO'S BEHIND PNAC HISTORY OF ARAB SPRING

Critique of Eugyppius(blogger)'s Mis-Characterization of 'Wokeness' as a Decentralized Movement of Nutters when, in truth, It has been Directed from Above by Jewish Supremacism

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/there-isnt-one-plan-there-are-fifty/

eugyppius: "Before I fled, I endured two pretty difficult years, navigating tidal of waves of nonsense and trying to stay uncanceled. In the midst of it all, I had plenty of time to study the institutional workings of the Woke."

But it all depends on which part of the elephant one is touching. Eugyppius saw the outward manifestations, not its innermost infestations. Cultural Revolution looked different in the streets with rampaging Red Guards than in the minds of Mao and his cohorts, for whom it was less about ideological purity than political machinations.

eugyppius: "The fundaments of their dogma were laid by specific critical theorists long before I entered graduate school"

But who got to favor and promote such dogma? Any academic can cook up some theory, but why are certain ideas favored over others? Who does the favoring and why? Also, some ideas are concocted specifically to serve an agenda. Thus, the theorist is less concerned with the idea itself than its utility to the bigger agenda, which may actually be irrelevant to or even opposed to the theory in principle. For example, does Jewish Power push 'anti-racism' because Jews are really committed to combating 'racism' and loving black people OR because 'anti-racism', as currently conceived in the West, has a way of deracinating whites into moral paralysis and submission, which is useful to Jewish Supremacists who then control whites toward supporting Zionism in the Middle East over Arabs/Palestinians and Muslims in general? If Jewish pushers of 'anti-racism' were truly sincere in their dogma, they would condemn not only white 'racism' but Jewish Zionist supremacism over Palestinians. But that isn't the case at all. Also, the very same Jews who howl about 'nazi, nazi, nazi' have no qualms about working with naziesque elements in Ukraine.

Another notable phenomenon is that all those delirious sincere wokesters almost never think or feel beyond the narrative/dogma handed to them from above. There is almost no connecting the dots on their own. They must be TOLD and DIRECTED as to how 'wokeness' should operate. For example, if racial violence is wrong, then Zionist terror against Palestinians and black crime/violence against whites & non-blacks should be condemned. But 'wokeness' lacks consistency of logic. Rather, it's based on a hierarchy the holies and unholies. Paradoxically, precisely because whites are in the unholiest camp, they must be most 'woke' to gain holy-redemption points, which explains why some of the most obnoxious 'woke' types are whites. And of course, the easiest way for whites to gain 'holiness' is by waving the globo-homo banner, which explains the popularity of 'gay' stuff among white progs.

If 'wokeness' has inner logic beyond the control of the elites, how many churches have been seen with BDS or pro-Palestinian signs? I haven't seen any. I've only seen globo-homo and BLM signs, both favored by Jews. US neo-imperialism under Bush to Obama to Trump to Biden has destroyed millions of people in the Middle East. Where is the 'woke' outrage about that? Your average 'woke' moron cares more about some black criminal like George Floyd than millions of Muslims bombed to oblivion or starved to death.

This goes to show that 'wokeness' is totally orchestrated and controlled; it is not to be confused with the True Left that, ideologically misguided or not, tries to be morally consistent in its critique of Power. So, Aaron Mate, like him or not, will call out on the horrors of US neo-imperialism in Ukraine, Venezuela, Syria, and West Bank. Oliver Stone will defend Edward Snowden for exposing the Deep State. In contrast, to the delight of Jewish Supremacists, 'woke' morons are more obsessed about the sacralization of George Floyd(useful to Jews in white moral paralysis) and how some fat ugly hairy guy should be addressed as 'she' or 'they'. In other words, while 'wokesters' may cause headache for the sane and moderate, they do no harm to the Power, which is Jewish and dedicated mostly to guilt-baiting whites and confusing categories so that no united front, right or left, can emerge.

The rise of 'woke-ism' is a death knell to the real left. The True Left, again like it or not, gained power by unity in organization and purpose. It was about the masses or the workers led by disciplined leadership. Or it was about national liberation struggles in Cuba or Vietnam. In contrast, 'wokeness' is about division and atomization of so-called 'progressivism' into countless tiktok lunatics, mostly yammering about 'gender', which now comes in how many flavors? 500? Trannies make up less than 1% of the population, but 50% of 'woke' discussion seems to center on how many gender-splitting can be achieved under a microscope. And the Power(Jewish) has pushed this among the impressionable young, and in the UK, 50% of young people don't believe they're either male or female, and 40% of young idiots in the US have followed suit. This kind of nuttery poses NO THREAT to the power. Yes, it's frustrating(and even terrifying) to decent scholars in academia who want to remain sane and do good work. The Power isn't interested in principles or virtues of the honest academic but in maintaining its own supremacy. Jewish Power is especially nihilistic because it looks upon goyim as less-than-human, in other words expendable. Thus, when Jewish Power uses 'wokeness', all it cares about is "Is it good for Jews?" Even if wokeness undermines the quality of academia, it's 'worth it', just like Madeleine Albright said it's worth it to kill half a million Arab kids because, well, it's good for Israel. Of course, she didn't name Israel, but why has Jewish Power steered US foreign policy toward smashing nations in the Middle East? It's about 'any means necessary' for Zionist supremacy.

eugyppius: "People tend to believe things that further their personal interests, and universities are no exception."

People looking out for their personal interest has been a constant throughout history and in all places. It's no different in Iran, Russia, China, Brazil, Italy, North Korea, Japan, Israel, and Mexico. People have been looking out for their personal interests in Ancient Greece, Pagan Rome, Catholic Poland, and etc. But the question is, "Do most people define their own personal values?" Did European Christians arrive at the Faith like Saint Paul who wrestled with his own soul? No, the religion gained political dominance, and being pro-Christian became synonymous with personal advancement. Likewise, personal interest in communist nations became synonymous with believing in Marx and Lenin. So, while countless communist professionals in the Soviet Union were indeed working for personal interests, their personal beliefs were imposed or implanted by the Power. This is where the political becomes personal. Most people don't have imagination to come up with their own ideas of what's right.
So, the question is WHO or WHAT has been most responsible for cooking up the current brew of 'wokery' and making it mandatory medicine for all those seeking professional advancement. Take the military. I'm sure many there still despise 'wokery', but most are silent from top to bottom because they know they can be purged and ruined for going against it. But did 'wokery' spontaneously arise from the ranks or was it foisted on the military from above?

eugyppius: "Wokification succeeded largely because it gave a lot of different people a lot of different things that they wanted. It gave the increasingly powerful university administration a reason to hire more administrators to manage diversity and ensure its forward march. Self-propagation is the highest goal of administrators everywhere. Wokeness also became a useful tool in ongoing turf wars between administrators and faculty. Diversity is a simple metric via which the administration can interfere with faculty hiring and academic operations; new diversity hires know who is buttering their bread and remain loyal to the administrators whose policies brought them in. For the increasingly mediocre and incapable faculty who now teach at even the most august American schools, the woke circus has its own attractions."

But that doesn't distinguish 'wokery' from any other factor intrinsic to professional competition and advancement. The real question should be, "Why did wokery become the basis of advancement and empowerment?" After all, Iran works on the same principles but with different themes; there, you have to be pro-Islamic to get ahead. And in China, even those skeptical of communism must sing paeans to Mao to move up the political ladder. There will always be 'turf wars', whether 'wokery' is around or not. Trotskyites vs Maoists. It's like the Jets vs the Sharks.
What's most astounding about the rise of 'wokery' is how something so absurd could have gained so much traction; in other words, it didn't happen organically. We can understand why so many youths(and even academics) in college campuses became anti-war during the Vietnam War. Many were morally outraged by the slaughter. Some didn't want to be drafted. College professors were convinced the war was unwinnable. Also, good many were sincerely inspired by Marxism that seemed to speak for the oppressed. In contrast, 'wokery' is about what? At least 50% of it is about celebration of sodomy as the second coming(or cumming) and 'gender' pronouns. Rest is about how fat hairy guys with penis and balls are 'women', tattoos and piercings, and calling everything 'nazi' or 'white supremacist'.
And its only racial theme seems to be the holiness of blacks. While 'wokery' atomizes the so-called 'left' into basket-case inanities, it's not true that every gripe or complaint is equal in Wokedom. There is a very strict hierarchy. Blacks over whites and nonblacks. Endless tears for dead black thugs but zero sympathy for victims of blacks. Trannies over feminists and lesbians. Also, while Karenism is encouraged and rewarded against anyone deemed 'conservative' or 'unvaccinated', it is suddenly a great crime when it calls out on bad black behavior. Also, while Antifa is encouraged to attack and terrorize whatever movement hated by Jews, it never shows up at pro-Zionist events. Given that Zionist power is the product of super-capital and Jewish racial supremacism, one would think the 'leftist' and 'woke' Antifa would violently protest AIPAC rallies. But there's no such. Antifa doesn't march through campuses calling for sanctions on Israel. Notice 'wokery' comes with a pass-over clause. The fact that most 'woke' people comply with such rules shows that they're either (1) too stupid to connect the dots and think for themselves or (2) too craven to be consistent in their morality and just remain within the allowed perimeters of outrage.

eugyppius: "It provides distraction from the unrelenting demands of objectivity and originality, and permits a pleasing, self-righteous indulgence in moral scolding. In Woke Studies, the answers are always predetermined and it is very easy to get anything published, provided you say the right things."

Yes, but this didn't originate with 'wokeness'. This kind of behavior is quite evident among 'conservatives' as well. If Donald Trump and his 'conservative' followers were into objectivity and facts, they would have to admit that Jewish Power was most instrumental in 'fortifying' the 2020 elections. Indeed, Jewish Power in media and deep state did much to orchestrate the Covid Hysteria(to rig elections and tip economics in favor of oligarchs) and the BLM riots of 2020 to intimidate America, but all you get from Trump is 'Muh Israel', and the likes of Mike Lindell, Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon, and Sidney Powell are blaming China, Iran, and Venezuela for the election fraud. Their logic, either idiotic or craven, is hardly different from 'wokeness'. It's premised on the idolatry or dogma that Jews are never wrong, Israel is holy, and the American Right must suck up to Jewish Power no matter what. Trumpism can be characterized as Jewish Power f***king him in the ass, and him turning around and pleading to his violator, "Can I suck your d***?" Or consider Israel's role in USS Liberty and the coverup by the US government. Objectively, Israel should have been called to account. And Jewish American Power should have been exposed for favoring tribal interests over objective truth and justice. But, American 'conservatives' have been acting against objective truth in its fear of Jewish Power and the hope that if they appease Jewish Power just enough, many more rich, powerful, and verbally gifted Jews will come over to the American Right. And of course, 'conservatives' feel a moral deficit and want Jews-as-Holy-Holocaust-People to join them and automatically wash the Right with Anne Frank Soap.

Morality in the US isn't based on ideology but idolatry. It's a matter of WHO than WHAT. So, Jews, permanently canonized as Holy Holocausters, can do no wrong. They can act like Nazis toward the Palestinians and even work with Naziesque types in Ukraine. They can fund and arm ISIS and other terrorist types to cause grave harm to secular modernizers like Assad of Syria. The American Right has gone along with this irrational and crazy kind of 'morality' where Jews are always right because of some historical association to WWII. Likewise, it's not just the 'woke' but the 'conservatives' who subscribe to the notion of eternal black holiness because of the slavery narrative and MLK cult. When has Trump or any prominent 'conservative' called out on black thuggery and violence? No, they yammer about Mexican rapists and Muslim terrorists, but, when it comes to blacks, it's all about how the GOP cares more for Noble Negroes.
'Woke' lunacy isn't just the product of idiot degenerates and the Jewish Power that favors and funds them. Much of the blame must also go to craven 'conservatives' who, in their mindless mania to appease and win the approval of Jews, were silent about the increasing arrogance, hatred, and dementia of Jewish Supremacism. If, after what Jewish Power did to the US in 2020, one is still dreaming of Jews-seeing-the-light-and-coming-to-the-Right, it's truly pathetic(and irrational as hell). At any rate, one so irrational and delusional should not be accusing the 'woke' of nuttery. One should look in the mirror.

Woke mobs are decentralized at the bottom, but the directives come from above. Most woke idiots are incapable of generating their own ideas, themes, or narratives. Such must be handed down to them. It's like blood hounds may wander all over the place and appear free-ranging, but it's in service of pursuing the scent provided to them. They are 'freely' fixated on that one scent provided by the Master.

Without elite academic culture, what is the likelihood that so many 'woke' morons would be into creative pronouns and 100 genders? Are we to believe, all on their own and in decentralized enclaves, they came up with the notion of 'they' for a man-posing-as-woman in all fifty states(and even in foreign countries)?

Here's a typical case of woke mob-mentality and how it's directed from above. The elites said Covid is a killer, and Trump is to blame. All must be locked down because Covid will kill, kill, kill. Woke mobs were saying, STAY INSIDE or else you'll die!!

But then, the Power decides racial violence is just the thing to drive a wedge between blacks and Trump(who made some inroads), and all of sudden, the very woke types who'd been acting so scared of Covid are suddenly out in force in the streets and running riot. And the media don't call foul on this because they're the instrument of the Power that gave the go-ahead to the mass riots and 'mostly peaceful protests'.

Now, if Covid is really a mass killer, wouldn't 'woke' protests lead to countless deaths among progs and blacks? Not very conducive to the objective of 'black lives matter', is it? But for the duration of the riots, it was as if the Covid went on vacation and spared all those proggies and blacks. Wink wink between elites and woke mobs.

And if wokeness has a logic all its own and keeps spreading on the basis of radical equal justice, when has anyone seen a blue city street painted with 'Palestinian Lives Matter' sign? When?

eugyppius: "In Woke Studies, the answers are always predetermined and it is very easy to get anything published, provided you say the right things."

Predetermined by whom? If some 'woke' type wants to work in Hollywood and proposes a movie about the evils of Zionist terrorism and 'racism' against Palestinians, how far would that person go? If some 'woke' type proposed a movie exposing the evils of Zionist-led US neo-imperialism in facilitating ISIS and other terrorists in Syria, would he get a green light in 'woke' Hollywood? Of course, hardly any such 'woke' type exists because 'wokery' has been devised by Jews from the beginning. A genuine leftist or even rightist might propose such ideas in Hollywood, but 'wokesters' are LINO, or leftist-in-name-only. The Power created a movement that favors infantile outrage and celebrity-vanity over honesty, principles, and thought. It's like dogs love to bark and bite but hardly get to decide the target. They will bark at and bite anything they are directed to. People with autonomy of thought and values cannot be so easily manipulated. The Power favors emotions over ideas and ideas over facts. The Power not only recruits young ones like Greta Thunberg but encourages childish emotions among adults. Children don't care what they're eating as long as it's sweet. They don't care what they're doing as long as it's fun. And infantilized adults, the 'woke', don't care what they're chanting about AS LONG AS it gives them the euphoric high of self-righteousness. They don't care what they are barking at AS LONG AS their adrenaline is fired up in righteous rage. And the Power can spin ANYTHING to energize the 'woke'. When Donald Trump spoke of ending US occupation of Syria, the Jewish-run media spun it as 'Trump is betraying all those noble Kurds to the butcher Assad', and that was enough for 'woke' tards to get hysterical(even though they'd hardly given any thought to the conflict over there). They very 'woke' idiots who were howling about 'kids in cages' in the Southwest border under Trump's presidency are now indifferent to the same or worse problems. Why? The Power directed their energies elsewhere. Lacking a sense of autonomy — these morons would be totally lost without the company of likeminded minions — , the 'woke' always need to be on the latest outrage bandwagon, and it's almost always chosen by the Power. Notice how BLM is suddenly hot, then it's not. For several yrs, it was relatively muted but then it came out big in 2020 when Jewish Power needed all the firepower against Trump and to intimidate America with muscle and (false) morality.

As for trannies, Jewish Power finds them useful enough. But tranny nuttery could be ended overnight if Jews so decided. Trannies are less than 1% of the population. Also, tranny reputation can go south instantly if the Jewish-run Media spilled the beans on all the dirt and scumminess in the tranny closet. Lots of famous trannies are deeply compromised characters with history of drug abuse, child abuse, and sexual crimes. If Jews really wanted to crush trannies, all they need to do is air the dirty laundry. Trannies didn't make themselves powerful, no more than Greta Thunberg did.
There is the Power and the empowered. The Power has autonomous support systems of maintenance. Jews control media, banking, academia, deep state, real estate, whore politicians, and etc. In contrast, the empowered need the favors of the Power. It's like Hitler Youth needed the support of the National Socialist Party. Red Guards needed the go-ahead from Mao. So much of 'wokeness' could be ended overnight by the Power if it directed the money and energies elsewhere. The notion that green-haired tattoo-riddled freaks on Tiktok and Twitter and gender studies department in universities are dictating matters is too funny. No, the gender lunacy was pushed by Jewish Power to foster confusion not only between the Right and the Left but within the Left, to the point where the Left is now useless in its decadence and degeneracy. Just think what would happen to China or Russia or Iran if it were overcome with gender pronoun lunacy and tranny nuttery, the kind pushed by Jewish-run deep state all over the world? It would become like deracinated South Korea where the national culture revolves around fruity gay-pop K-pop pansies. Furthermore, spread of global BLM instructs goyim in every country to prioritize black identity(as holy) over their own. It further leads to deracination and weakening of national pride and autonomy. This is why Jews push such garbage all over the world. And it's why Jews are furious at Russia and China's saying NO to globo-homo and gender-garbage. It's not about the spread of 'liberal democratic' values but about the spread of Jewish Supremacism by other means.
Now, some will say Jews themselves face problem with 'wokery' within their own ranks, but here's the crucial difference. As globo-homo is the Jewish weapon(and as homos are utterly loyal to Jews as their masters), Jews feel a sense of domination when they wave the homo flag; it's an expression of victory of the Jewish Will. In contrast, goyim feel submission when they wave the homo flag; it's an act of surrender to the Jewish Will. It's the difference between a British Imperialist waving the Union Jack and a subject of the British Empire waving it.
Also, unlike idiot goyim, Jews don't undermine their own power over bitter ideological strife. Israel is both globo-homo central and orthodox Jewish central. It puts on massive homo parades as the metropole of globalist dominance but also put on the biggest funeral in its history for a rabbi who said goyim exist only to serve Jews. Jewish 'woke' don't wage war on the Jewish Right. If anything, they are united on grounds of "Is it good for Jews?" Do you see 'liberal democratic' Jews in the US attacking Israel for its rightist-nationalist policies? How many Jewish Democrats denounced Israel for honoring a rabbi who said goyim are no better than cattle and it's even justified to take the organ from a goy so that a holier Jew can live? If anything, even Democratic Jews pressured Obama to bow down to Netanyahu and offer even more aid to Israel. We are told of the anti-Israel 'squad' in Congress, but they are merely FOUR, with AOC shedding crocodile tears for Palestinians while doing the bidding of AIPAC. Joe Biden is a total puppet of his Jew-heavy administration, but how come the 'woke', supposedly into 'inclusion' and 'diversity', aren't outraged by the vastly disproportionate Jewish makeup of Biden's regime, which should be called the Jewish Regime with Biden as senile-Brezhnev-like puppet?

eugyppius: "For students, Wokeness has still other attractions—as a font of easy coursework, as an opportunity for social networking, and as a locus for the periodic ritual entertainment of false moral outrages and protests."

Not very convincing on easy coursework. Long before 'wokeness', colleges have turned into party schools. Students could do minimum work and still graduate. Also, college professors learned to grade on a very generous curve system long before 'wokeness'.
As for 'false moral outrage', it's human nature to want religion, and in the absence of old faiths, there is a need for new ones. As the modern mind has been shaped by fashion, celebrity culture, and vanity, 'wokeness' is appealing because it's packaged as the latest fads and trends in moral outrage.

eugyppius: "All of this is to say that Wokeness was selected from many aspiring ideological and intellectual programs, because it gave the right things to the right people."

No, for all its yammering about 'diversity' and 'inclusion', most of 'wokery' revolves around three themes: Blackity Blackness, Globo-Homo genderist nuttery, and Shut-Up about Jewish Power(by fixating on fantastical threats from White Supremacy and the Autocracy of Russia & China, all the while pretending the West is about 'liberal democracy'). Suppose you're from Bolivia and want to raise awareness about the plight of Bolivians and the beauty of Bolivian pride. You can try, but you won't get very far. Wokeness isn't about diversity for diversity's sake but for diversity revolving around blackness, homo-ness, and anti-whiteness(and anti-Russia/China-ness) as diversion from the fact of Jewish Supremacist control of the West. There's more ink spilled in favor of trannies than for all the diverse ethnic/national groups around the world among the 'wokesters'. If you aren't homo or black, the only chance of gaining a bit of attention for your kind is to associate it with globo-homo or BLM. In other words, a Vietnamese-American for Vietnamese pride gets nowhere, but he or she might get some attention by associating his/her identity with support of homos or blacks, or by denouncing 'white supremacism' as the biggest evil in the world(even though a yellow person is far more likely to be terrorized by a black criminal or thug). And of course, he or she better shut up about Jews. That's 'wokery'. It's not about a hundred flowers contending for hundred interests but about hundred identities coalescing around few favored themes imposed from above: Globo-Homo, Noble Negro, and Blame-Whitey(and ignore Jewey).

eugyppius: "The donors, the trustees, the tenured faculty, the powerful committees – none of these hold the reins either. Wokery is a self-organising decentralised movement."

Nope. Donors may not hold the reins but they provide the water. It's like the ones who control the dam don't control the sails and rudders on the boats in the lake, but they can turn off the water supply, in which case the lake will go dry and the boats will be rendered useless, regardless of who controls the sails and rudders. The relative ups and downs of BLM owed a great deal to Jewish Money and Jewish Media Control, a multi-billion-dollar enterprise. There are plenty of Christians all over America, but they get nowhere because they don't have donors. Why did the GOP steer toward globo-homo, 'gay marriage', and even tranny nuttery? Because the big donors favor cuck-minions who never oppose the agenda. Donors matter a great deal. Even without the donors, 'woke' idiots can go on being 'woke', but they will no longer have any traction.

It's like the Alt Right. In 2016, the media decided to shine a light on it, not all of it negative. So, Richard Spencer got his 15 min of fame and celebrity. Even as a 'villain', everyone seemed to know him and talk about him. The fool thought his fame or infamy came naturally. But when the media shut him out, he was suddenly a zero. Most white 'woke' morons don't have minds of their own. They lack agency to come up with their own dogmas, narratives, and gods. So, they rely on orders and decrees from above. Jewish money was behind globo-homo and tranny nuttery from the beginning, and it helped that Jews control the media. Also, Jews in Wall Street and Hollywood figured globo-homo would be great to Jewish Power that no longer cares for class struggle as most Jews are rich. Just make white 'progressives' expend most of their energies in favor of vain homos and trannies who are happy to gain favors from Jews and work with the US deep state.
Indeed, look how globo-homo is the new missionary arm of US imperialism. A navy ship named after Harvey Milk. Given US aggression around the world, one would think the 'woke' would be outraged at homo cooperation with the deep state. Or, one would think the 'woke' would be outraged that the black general Lloyd Austin is a commander in US military aggression. But no, the very people who weep about George Floyd don't care about the innocents murdered in Afghanistan or Syria. They aren't outraged by US bombs painted with BLM signs that are dropped all over Muslim lands. 'Wokeness' isn't true leftism. It is the Jewish Supremacist appropriation and perversion of Leftism to serve what is really an ultra-rightist Jewish Supremacism. It's like European empires twisted the meaning of Christianity to turn Jesus Christ into some warrior-god who justified the conquests and plunders of so-called Christendom. 'Wokeness' is to leftism what Prosperity Gospel is to Jesus's teachings.

eugyppius: "Importantly, Wokeness is also self-radicalising, in the way that many university-incubated ideologies turn out to be. Administrators or department chairs are constantly in danger of being outflanked on their left, and so they must adopt and endorse the most radical line to maintain their position."

It's more self-Fadicalizing than radicalizing. Because 'wokery' is based more on idolatry than ideology, it has limits to which it can radicalize. Ideas can be radicalized into greater purity, aka purity spiral. In contrast, idolatry throws the monkey wrench in ideological purification because it favors certain tribal identities over others. For example, ideology of equality would call for ever greater application of equal treatment. But because Jews have been idolized, equal justice for Palestinians hardly gets anywhere. Also, the idolatry of BLM makes purity in racial equality impossible. If indeed the ideology says all races must be treated equally, then not only would anti-black violence be condemned but the violence committed by blacks(as thugs in the streets or as US soldiers in the Middle East dropping bombs on Muslims). But the black idolatry of BLM doesn't allow for ideological purity because of blackness uber alles. Likewise, if ideology of equality were to apply to homos, they should be held accountable for the troubles they cause. But the globo-homo idolatry makes ideological purity impossible because homos, like Jews and blacks, get pass-over rights and aren't held accountable for all the social malaise they cause through spread of disease and cultural decadence.
Indeed, just ask the Palestinians about what 'wokeness' has done for them. Despite all this talk of equity, has the NY Times been pressure to 'include' a Palestinian-American columnist? Is the Democratic Party under pressure to include some Palestinian/Arab/Muslim people in Biden's administration? Is there outrage that so many college presidents are hardline Zionist, thereby either dismissive or suppressive of BDS movements on campus?

'Wokery' is misunderstood because it's really an ultra-right ideology cloaked in faux 'leftism'. 'Diversity' really means diverse peoples must coalesce at the supremacist feet of Jews, blacks, and homos. 'Inclusion' means Jews get to include more of their allies to mute criticism of Israel and Jews while everything is blamed on 'white supremacism'(or Russia and China). 'Equity' means More for Blacks where they're deficient. It certainly doesn't mean treating Jews and Palestinians equally in US media, government, or institutions. Tell me WHO in Hollywood or TV-land has insisted on more pro-Palestinian programming to make things more equitable? Hollywood already made EXODUS the movie, and the US news media feature countless Jewish voices. WHO among the 'woke' is demanding a movie about Nakba for 'equity'-sake? Who? If anything, 'wokesters' know full well that they won't have a chance in Big Tech, Hollywood, Wall Street, and Ivy League if they open that can of worms. Some time ago, Cornel West complained of how he'd been targeted by Jews in Harvard for his pro-Palestinian stance, and furthermore, even most Negroes didn't come to his aid because they know they got more to gain by groveling at the feet of Jews than by standing by a brotha. Blacks do enjoy supremacist advantage under 'wokeness' but IF AND ONLY IF they don't try to apply rules of 'equity' to Jewish Power.

eugyppius: "While Wokeness provides many personal incentives for true believers, it is destructive for the institutions that foster it. Those schools that have advanced very far down the woke path face semi-regular hate speech hoaxes and student protests, hordes of incapable hostile junior faculty, and massive curricular disarray."

True, but as Jewish Power rules the US and its top priority is "Is it good for Jews?", it doesn't matter if 'wokeness' is harmful to institutions. If harming institutions secures more power for Jews, that's all that matters. It's like the Sacklers knew that their drugs were destroying many goy lives. But they didn't care because all they cared about was More Money. Jews know that Neocon policies did irreparable harm to Middle East nations, but again, what do they care? Their Jewish supremacism only cares about what's-good-for-Jews, so who cares if millions of Arabs/Muslims suffer? And who cares if the West is inundated by millions of refugees as the result of Wars for Zion? Did Jews care about the harm done to countless Russians in the 1990s when shock-doctrine capitalism concentrated 50% of Russian wealth overnight in the hands of Jewish oligarchs working in cahoots with Global Jewry? No.
It all depends on priorities. Perhaps, Jews would like to have the cake and eat it too where they get both Jewish Supremacy and excellent institutions. But if they feel the choice is between Jewish Supremacism and the health of institutions, they will go with the former. Jews favor power over principles. Look how the Jewish-heavy ACLU is no longer about Free Speech as Jews got the power and don't want to be criticized. Look how Jews who once spouted principles about civil liberties(violated by Joe McCarthy) are totally into blacklisting and deplatforming people today. Bari Weiss didn't leave NYT because it purged the likes of her but because it didn't purge enough of the people she hated. (She was unhappy in a paper that is heavily weighed in favor of Jews against Palestinians. But for the idiot 'right', she is the face of 'free speech' against 'wokeness'. LOL) Whether it's 'liberal' Chuck Schumer or 'conservative' Jennifer Rubin, it's really about Jewish supremacism.

eugyppius: "Alas, this doesn’t matter either. Nobody, not even Kimberlé Crenshaw, can redirect or modulate Wokeness any longer."

This 'wokery' will continue to be about idolatry of blacks, homos, and Jews. It hasn't been anything but a Noble Negro cult, Globo-Homo reverie, and Jews-are-Anne-Franks-no-matter-what-they-do. That is all 'wokeness' is. It hasn't been anything else and will never be.

eugyppius: "All of this matters, because American universities aren’t just eager sponsors of racial hysteria. They have also emerged as some of the most radical centres of Corona containment in the world. Their students endure all manner of unreasonable hygiene measures."

Again, this is a Jewish thing. Just play a mind game. Suppose it was Trump and his gang that wanted to push the Covid panic. Suppose Trump and his ilk had something to gain from Covid mania and its fallout. But suppose the Jewish-run media, the deep state, college elites, medical community, and big tech all chose to poo-poo Trump as fear-monger, a medical nazi, and power-hungry demagogue. Suppose Fauci was on air assuring the public that Covid is no big deal and that Trump is off his rocker. Suppose the Jewish-heavy medical community and media favored methodologies that minimized the number of Covid deaths. Would this Covid thing have gained traction? Jews control the institutions and infrastructure whereby certain ideas, agenda, and manias are quickly disseminated from top to bottom. Take the Russia Collusion Hoax. It was utter nonsense from day one for anyone with sense, but Jews have such total control over the institutions and media industries that those raised to be 'good little progressives' readily fall for the BS. It's like there's still plenty of idiot 'conservatives' who knee-jerkedly salute the flag and regard soldiers as 'heroes' no matter the war. People don't think. The very 'liberals' who've been going on and on about the bad ole days of the 'Red Scare' and paranoia suddenly became far nuttier than Joe McCarthy and his supporters about the specter of Evil Putin. What does this tell you? It's not about ideology, let alone ideological purity. It's about suckers whose 'ideology' is totally at the mercy of Jewish manipulation. This Covid nuttery can end overnight if Jews want it to end. It never would have become a thing if the orders didn't come from the top. Fauci would have never come to prominence if he wasn't useful to the deep state. His career was carefully constructed despite so many failures.

In a way, 'wokeness' is like a strange mass-conspiracy. It's not like all the 'wokesters' getting in a smoke-filled room with the globalist elites to hatch a plan. Still, much of the 'woke' mentality is the sense that the 'educated progressive' types are 'in the know' and working for 'human evolution' that requires the concentration of power in the right kind of people. Thus, 'wokery' has a double appeal. Among the earnest dummies, it's really real, like the morons in George Orwell's 1984 who really believe Eurasia, once a forever friend, is now a forever enemy. But among the conceited smarty 'woke', they believe they are 'in' on the grand scheme of historical power. In other words, they sense or know that much of 'wokery' is baloney but nevertheless go along because it is subversive of reactionary forces that must be destroyed by any means necessary. It's like adults or 'grown-ups in the room' don't tell kids the truth but what-is-good-for-them because it's agreed that kids simply can't handle the truth. Just like smarter Jews look upon goyim as children, smarty 'wokesters' look upon humanity as one big sheeple to manipulate. Smarty 'wokesters' believe in power and the agenda, and ANYTHING, however false, is justified if it furthers the agenda. One thing that Project Veritas exposed was that many in the Woke Industry don't really believe in their own hype. Rather, they keep up with the facade because of its political utility. This adds an element of adventure and romance to 'wokery'. It's like playing spy or secret agent. After all, in war, hot or cold, you don't use honesty to gain the upperhand. You use deception and subterfuge. So, while plenty of 'woke' idiots actually believed in Russian Collusion Hoax, many pushed it cynically just to hurt Trump. And even though some 'woke' morons are really into gender nuttery, others push it as just another weapon against normative conservatives. It makes them feel like Lawrence of Arabia or even 007 in a game of strategy.

So, whereas the church-wokesters actually believe in the nonsense handed to them from above, war-wokesters merely treat it as a manual of combat, rather like 'Rules for Radicals' by Saul Alinsky. As such, even though they aren't privy to the inner-workings of the Power, they feel they are on the same mental wavelength as those in conspiratorial circles. But such mentality exists on the 'right' also. Q-Anon morons think they are in on some secret, a 4-D chess that is being played by Trump. So, even Trump's defeat in 2020 was part of The Plan to, wink-wink, expose the Deep State. ROTFL.

eugyppius: "People raised up as leaders and heroes of emerging movements are almost never its directors, but merely expressions of all the separate beliefs and aspirations of those involved. Ultimately it’s just extremely difficult for any confined group of people, no matter how wealthy or powerful, to implement any kind of coherent agenda in heavily bureaucratised modern states."

If this is true, how come 'wokery' almost never deviates from the Tri-Idolatry of Jews, blacks, and homos? Sure, feminists and stuff like MeToo are thrown a bone now and then when it's useful to the Power, but what other themes have been expressed by 'wokeness'? Also, even if there are many voices and interests in 'wokeness', nothing gains traction and momentum without favoritism from above. Suppose a 'wokester' calls for ending mass immigration because the American Indians were victims of 'genocide' caused by mass invasions from the Old World. What chance is there of powerful institutions amplifying such concerns? In 2020, streets were painted with BLM signs, but how many streets were painted with PLM or Palestinian Lives Matter signs? BLM was painted outside Trump tower. Will 'wokery' leads to PLM signs on the streets outside Jewish centers in NY or Hollywood? Fat chance. If any 'wokester' painted such, he or she'd be arrested and locked up.

eugyppius: "These constraints don’t exist in every country, but in the world of liberal democracy, this is very roughly how governance happens."

US is a liberal democracy? Really? A nation where Jews, 2% of the population, have ethno-supremacist stranglehold over so many industries and institutions but are NEVER CALLED OUT ON IT? A nation where the Power allows Antifa and BLM to run riot but unleashes brutal police force on any patriot that fights back? (Unlike racial violence in the 1960s that spiraled out of control, the 2020 racial violence was orchestrated by the deep state. It was the Power concentrated in Jewish hands waging war on the nation as punishment for Trump's presidency. It was far worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11, which also had a Jewish Hand.)

The US came closest to liberal democracy in the 60s and 70s when Wasp power was waning, and the power was up for grabs among various groups and voices. Back then, Jews were not assured of their supremacist position and supported free speech to defend their right to compete for influence. Since then, Jewish Power has risen like Mt. Everest over all others, and the US today is properly an ethno-supremacist oligarchic gangster state. What we see with Political Correctness and 'wokery' cannot happen in a true liberal democracy. Rather, what has happened over the years is that principled liberals have lost ground to pushy, nasty, vicious, and supremacist Jewish ethno-supremacists who bitch about 'white privilege' but cry 'antisemitism' whenever someone calls out on Jewish Power. Even libertarians are full of BS. They will defend Jewish Big Tech's censoring of conservatives on grounds that private companies can do as they please. Okay, but isn't it wrong for the state to suppress BDS, an expression of free speech in favor of Palestinian rights? But there is total silence on this matter from most libertarians.

Yoram Hazony & Abigail Shrier give False Impression of Jewish Heroism when Jewish Power is overwhelmingly Anti-Nationalist and Anti-Sanity(on sexual matters) — Why Jews had to especially flatter Black Megalomania with BLM bonanza in 2020

Exclusive: America's Most Important Right-Wing Conference Of The Year Is An Israeli Influence Operation - https://national-justice.com/exclusive-americas-most-important-right-wing-conference-year-israeli-influence-operation

There are HBD(human bio-diversity) types and dissident rightists who promote the likes of Yoram Hazony and Abigail Shrier, lending the false impression that Jews are at the forefront of defending nationalism and sexual sanity when such figures are, at best, outliers in the Jewish Community or, worse, participants in the deception. In fact, most of Jewish Power is anti-white, anti-nationalist(except for Israel), and anti-sexual-sanity.

The only kind of Jews worthy of trust are those who acknowledge loud and clear that the overall Jewish Agenda is virulently anti-white. We can trust Brother Nathanael on Jewish anti-white politics. We can trust Max Blumenthal on the Israel Lobby's influence over America. But Hazony pretty much makes the same rounds as the two-faced weasel Ben Shapiro: Identity for us Jews, not for you goyim. In Hazony’s view, there can be only ‘civic nationalism’ for whites, which, at this late date, is useless. ONLY JEWS get to have ethno-nationalism, though, in his infinite propensity to twist facts and logic, Hazony insists Israel celebrates 'diversity' because it has an Arab minority. In truth, Arabs still exist in Israel only because Jews failed to remove all of them in the Nakba campaigns. Jews didn't invite Arabs into Israel to celebrate 'multi-culturalism' and, if anything, they are hatching plans to realize the Final Plan of total Jewish supremacy in Israel and West Bank.

To my knowledge, Hazony doesn’t acknowledge that Jewish Power is leading the charge against whites(and other goyim), and Shrier doesn’t mention that Jews are the main funders and pushers of LGBTQXYZ nonsense. We are to believe that a bunch of mentally imbalanced trannies suddenly amassed so much power all on their own. Unless they mention WHO are behind the anti-white and anti-sanity agenda, they are bad faith actors and not to be trusted.

And whites who keep falling for such individuals as heroes or champions are either idiotic or hopeless. They are idiots because they name the symptoms but not the disease. So much of anti-white and anti-sane agenda originates and flows from the Jewish source.
Or they are hopeless because, like so many people in the West, they have an idolatrous fixation on Jews: A particular position is thought to be ennobled based on who/whom. So, if a Jew says something, it purportedly has higher value simply because it was expounded by a member of the Tribe endowed with higher innate worth. Such thinking is hardly different from the ‘wokeness' or 'jewokeness' of morons who sacralize blacks and believe something carries greater meaning and moral authority simply because it happens to have been associated with or expounded by blacks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Racial Reckoning: Just Looking Around by Robert Weissberg - https://www.unz.com/article/the-racial-reckoning-just-looking-around/

It be Bounty for the Mutiny.

Since the Clinton 90s, Jews and New Democrats espoused neo-liberal free trade and globalism. And they began to favor globo-homo over black issues except in rap and sports. Many young black males were thrown in jail and crime decreased drastically(and predictably). Big cities welcomed millions of immigrants who came to replace blacks in many places and industries. Blacks felt neglected. If blacks remained loyal to the Democratic Party in record numbers from 2008 to 2016, it was only because Barack Obama was the face of the party though he was really a puppet of Jews and homos.

But after Obama, there was the black realization that the Democrats don’t really offer them much(unless one works for the government). Besides, most of Obama’s tenure was about celebration of homos, bailing out Wall Street, and more Wars for Israel. And anti-Russian policy at the behest of hateful Jewish supremacists. BLM was a bone Obama threw to the blacks at the end.. with dire results. As too many blacks gained little or nothing under Obama in tangible terms, they were indulged with the symbolism of noble victimhood.
Over the years, the Democratic Party became the yuppie elite party, the college educated suburban party, the homo party, the Zionist party. Sure, it made a lot of noises about MLK and pretended Obama was The One, but most of its policies were along the lines of Stop-and-Frisk-the-Nigger-as-Super-Predator, urban gentrification, celebration of homos(most of them white) and welcoming diversity, aka mass immigration.

But as the GOP was so boring and dull(and associated with the Neo-Confederate South and sucking up to the rich), it could be taken for granted that blacks would remain with Democrats. What choice did they have?

But Donald Trump came along and made noises about too-much-immigration and taking care of America first. So, even though most blacks remained with the Democratic Party, Trump's brand of politics struck a certain chord in the black community. Democratic Party needs almost all the black votes to win in key areas. So, in a long while, the Democrats actually had to compete for every black vote. Now, how could they appeal to blacks when blue cities had been pushing for stop-and-frisk-the-nigger, globo-homo priority, and immigrants-uber-Negroes?

Roll out BLM in strength and make George Floyd the anointed one, and blame it all on the 'white supremacism' of Trump and white cops. And all those white and Jewish libby-dibs, who’d been supportive of stop-and-frisk policies and preference for homos/immigrants over blacks, did everything to cover their tracks; and by bleating about BLACK LIVES MATTER, they did all they could to fool others and themselves that they’ve been agonizing over the plight of the poor poor noble Negro. What a whitewash! From stop-and-frisk to stoop-and-wash(the Negro foot).

Jews control the big cities and the Democratic Party. Long ago, they got pissed with blacks, especially with Stinkin Dinkins(as mayor of NY), and did everything to suppress black crime and revive big cities beginning in the early 1990s. Jews succeeded for the most part, especially in the Big Apple(or Big Bagel). But this led to simmering black grievances about the Democrats in 2016 and 2020, especially as Obama was no longer in the running to placate the Negroes and as Trump came along as da gangsta making noises about MORE FOR AMERICANS than foreigners. So, Jewish Power felt compelled to hype BLM and sacralize Negrohood(to flatter black egomania), as well as spread the money around to keep blacks on the plantation. When all else fails, buy loyalty.

Another factor for neo-sacralization of the Negro had to do with stirring of white politics. Napoleon was to have said, “Let China sleep because, when it wakes, it will be one giant eggroll.” Jews feel the same way about whites. What if whites wake up from their wussy slumber and think independently? Jews fear that Trump stirred the white dragon from its comatose state. Even though Trump cucked to Zionists at every turn, he roused white political passion into a frenzy that reminded Jews of Germans en masse going “Heil Hitler”.

Jewish Power depends on white cuckery and goy obeisance to Jewish Power, and this means whites must NOT have a political consciousness of their own, one that's proud and autonomous. After all, emancipated whites might ask, “Why must we serve Jews at every turn when we are our own people with our own identity, culture, and heritage?”

Therefore, Jews believe they must emotionally paralyze whites with ‘white guilt’, and Jews believe blacks are most potent for this purpose because whites are in awe of blacks as super-athletes, super-rappers, super-butt-shakers, and super-dong folks. White people don’t feel too bad about having wiped out stony faced dull American Indians but get all emotional about how they’d once made people like Michael Jordan and Jay-Z pick cotton.

Of course, we may well ask WHY do whites, especially Anglos, cuck to Jews and appease them at every turn? The great lesson of WWII is supposed to be about how ‘appeasement’ doesn’t work. Neville Chamberlain has roundly been ridiculed as the biggest dumbass of all time because of his appeasement of Adolf Hitler. If that was foolish, why do Anglos think they can appease Jews and come off any better? (If anything, Hitler offered the Anglos a far better bargain, whereas Jews are pushing for nothing less than White Nakba of the West.)

If the Greek Lobby or Chinese Lobby or Russian Lobby tried to push the US or UK around, Anglos would say GO TO HELL, especially if Jews approve. But why are Anglos a bunch of Anglucks(Anglo-Cucks) when it comes to Jewish demands? How did Anglo politics become a dog show for the Jews?

BLACKS ARE TOP THUGS BUT JEWISH POWER TELL WHITES TO CUCK TO BLACK CRIMINALITY - DUMB WHITES COMPLY