Race-Mixing is NOT Leftist or Progressive — Race-Mixing has long been a weapon and product of War, Conquest, Imperialism, & Domination — It is No Different in the US where Jews push Jungle Fever and Whites embrace Cuck-dom in celebration of Black Superiority over perceived White Inferiority

In the past, blacks gained via cultural crossbreeding with whites. Whites also gained this way, especially in music. Charlie Parker and Miles Davis both had extensive knowledge of white and/or modern music. James Baldwin read extensively the classics of Western Lit. There was little race-mixing back then. The dynamics of racial mixing then was cultural and intellectual.

Nowadays, blacks don't care much about white culture. The attitude ranges from blissful indifference to toxic hostility bordering on phobia. Everything white is 'racist' or has something to do with 'white privilege'. Or, it is 'sexist' or 'homophobic', amusing coming from nonwhites because all human societies, white and nonwhite, have been mostly 'sexist' and 'homophobic' by today's insane standards.
But then, many whites don't care about white culture either. Raised on insta-thrill pop culture centered around rap, superhero movies, videogames, and pornification of just about everything(even kiddie culture at Disney), a lot of white kids haven't the patience or curiosity for anything that requires some effort and commitment. Or, they've been indoctrinated that Western Civilization is 'racist'. And yet, because of the undeniable greatness of the West, there is the OTHER agenda of blackening it. It used to be 'Hey Hey Ho Ho, Western Civ has got to go', but we increasingly hear, 'Hey Hey Ho Ho, Western Civ was Negro'. Not only are there theories that Ludwig van Beethoven was black but even clearly white historical figures, male and female, are increasingly depicted as black by Jewish-and-Cuck-run media. British queens, Finnish heroes, Roman generals, and etc. have been presented as black.

Sheeeeeeeiiiiit, was Beethoven a brotha?

Maybe Robert E. Lee will be rehabilitated if he's presented as black while the slaves are made white. The 'Hamilton'-ization of history. Then, maybe blacks and progs will feel, "Black Robert E. Lee was a great man for fighting to defend an institution that enslaved all those evil racist honkeys who deserved no freedom." What blacks denounce as 'racist' is suddenly cool if the great white man/woman is made black. And white cucks and even conzos seem to embrace this. Maybe they figure it's the only way to save Western Civ. Any great white figure in history or culture can instantly go from 'punkass lowlife racist honkey mofo' to 'badass supercool dude' IF black-faced. Maybe it will even impact Neo-Nazis who decide to make Hitler black.

Anyway, if cultural crossbreeding of yesteryear is gone due to black self-absorption and decline of serious appreciation of culture and ideas, it seems the only way left for blacks to gain from whites is via miscegenation. The hell with white ideas and culture. Rather, hump the white ho and appropriate white genes(pertaining to higher IQ and attractiveness) for the black race. After all, the product of white/black mixing is considered fully black than half-black/half-white. No one called Obama a half-black president. No one called Tiger Woods a quarter-black golfer. And this is gaining steam because race-mixing is considered as 'progressive'. But is it really?

Actually, race-mixing isn't leftist or anything new. It's older than the oldest profession of prostitution. The fate of Neanderthals can attest to that. Men like to pork anything, the age-old tradition of victors taking the women of the vanquished. This is why white folks got some Neanderthal genes. Cro-Magnons defeated and destroyed the Neanderthals but porked their women as sexual trophies. So, race-mixing isn't anything new but a weapon and product of war, invasion, conquest, oppression, domination, and humiliation. And what is happening today between whites and blacks is just another chapter in this power struggle of winners and losers, not of equals.

Were the Ancient Egyptians 'progressive' or 'leftist' for taking women of defeated tribes for sexual pleasure? Were the Romans 'progressive' or 'leftist' for having done the same? Were Arabs 'progressive' for having used white slave women as sex objects? Were the Moors 'leftist' for having humiliated Southern Europeans by race-mixing with white women? Were the Ottoman Turks 'progressive' for having used Greek girls(and boys) as sexual trophies? Were the Mongols 'leftist' for having sexually exploited all the peoples they conquered? Did Persian and Russian rejoice over this 'liberation' by the Golden Horde? Were the Spanish Conquistadors a bunch of 'leftist progressives' for having forced race-mixing on the brown natives of the Americas? Were Southern slave-owners 'leftist' for having sexually exploited black slave women? Were US troops 'leftist' for having turned the women of Vietnam into a whores for the US military? (If memory serves me right, it was the Viet Cong that was considered leftist in that struggle.) So, there is nothing that is intrinsically leftist or progressive about race-mixing. The history of race-mixing has been mostly brutal, aggressive, and humiliating(especially for the men of the losing side).

Now, there is a way race-mixing could be construed as leftist or progressive. The universal strain of leftism may argue that all men and women are brothers and sisters under the skin. Therefore, the ideal is for all of mankind to acknowledge one another's humanity and shared destiny and fall in love regardless of race and skin color or whatever. A colorblind coming together of the races based on the global union of the heart.
But is this what is happening? No. The fact is Jungle Fever isn't colorblind but color-bound because black men associate white women with more attractive features and because white women associate black men with more muscle and bigger dongs. It's about ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs premised on BAMMAMA, or Blacks-Are-More-Muscular-and-More-Aggressive. It's about black sexual imperialism, conquest, and colonization of the white race. There was a time when genuinely leftist Jews(though they could have been disingenuous back then) pushed the notion that all races are essentially alike apart from skin color. Especially Jews who grew up under communist parents seem to believe this. David Horowitz was one, but in the Sixties and Seventies, he couldn't help realize that blacks were about thug-muscle power and felt hostility toward geek lefty Jews. Blacks cynically exploited Jewish idealism whereas Jews, for all their smarts, were blind to the actuality of racial dynamics. In the book DESTRUCTIVE GENERATION, the story of Fay Stender, a Jewish leftist lawyer who defended black criminals and had sex with them, suggested that there were racial-sexual dynamics between Jews and blacks that went beyond common cause based on ideology.

Since then, Jewish Leftism has pretty much vanished. Almost no Jew accepts Marxist theory of anything. No Jew of any consequence is a communist, or even a real humanist. Most Jews who matter know privately that race does matter and that racial equality is just a pipe-dream. Most Jews now regard themselves as superior and deserving to rule over dumb and/or weak-willed goyim(like the 'darn tootin' guy in FARGO). If Jews carry on with the proggy-sounding agenda of 'anti-racism'(in a world where they instigate wars and crises in which Zionists are favored and countless Arabs are pushed through the meat grinder), it is only to guilt-bait whites into cucking and sucking up to Jewish Supremacists. The current prog-agenda isn't to defeat all forms of supremacism but to sustain Jewish supremacism by labeling any hint of white autonomy and agency as 'white supremacist'. Bait-and-Switch.

Indeed, this is why today's race-mix propaganda is so different from that of yesteryear. In a movie like Stanley Kramer's GUESS WHO BE COMING TO DINNER?, the white girl hardly notices that she's hooked up with a NEGRO! She just goes on and on about his fine character and social status as successful doctor. So, it's all about content of character or some such. It's not about Jungle Fever but a sexual version of TO SIR WITH LOVE, with Sidney Poitier reliably playing the capable and upstanding Negroid.
Fast Forward to today, and the message is clearly race-conscious, or Jungle Feverish. It's not about color-blind unity of the races but how white women should go with black men because they are superior to white men in manhood. It's essentially the Saigonization of the white race. In Saigon during the war, Vietnamese women were turned into whores and sexual property of the conquering white and black soldiers whereas Vietnamese males' roles were as cucks, collaborators, and coolies. Today, this dynamics is pushed all across America. Robin DiAngelo's stuff about White Fragility is just BS. We know she has Jungle Fever(and most white men have Cuckitis).

The massive race-mixing in the US isn't part of anything new. It's not 'leftist' or 'progressive' but continuation of the age-old racial dynamics of the conquering race taking the women of the loser race. Whites may be smarter than blacks, but that doesn't matter because Jews are smarter than whites. With their money and power of persuasion(with sticks and carrots), smarter Jews have pressured smart whites into worshiping dumb but stronger blacks. If there's only Bob and Billy, and if Bob is smarter than Billy, Bob will likely control Billy, even if Billy is stronger. Brains often wins over brawn. But if there's also Bruce and if Bruce is smarter than Bob, and if Bruce favors Billy over Bob, Bob too will end up favoring Billy over himself because smarter Bruce insists it be so. And that is where the US is at today. If there were no Jews in the US, whites would be better positioned vis-a-vis blacks. Whites would use their smarts to come up with best ways to control blacks. But because Jews are smarter than whites and effectively control white minds, if Jews say, "Blacks are holy whereas whites are assholy, therefore whites must kiss black ass for redemption", plenty of whites go along in obedience to Jews with the prestige of higher IQ.

Today's race-mixing isn't about colorblind coming together of the races. Rather, it's about power and preferences. Jewish and black power prefer white women, and white men just accept their lot as cuck-losers and not only shut up but CELEBRATE Shtetl Fever and Jungle Fever as the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Even though the power-dynamics have changed drastically in the US, the public discourse still carries on with outdated paradigm of 'white supremacism' or 'systemic racism'. This is especially so because Jewish Power has yet to rear its head as the true master of New America, and white morons, cucked and craven, don't have the guts to spell out the nature of the new reality. The effect is downright surreal. We have the Jewish supremacist overclass forcing white cuck-elites to carry on with the charade that the US is ruled by 'white supremacists' who must be resisted in order to create a society of greater 'equity' and 'inclusion'. If so, how about including some Palestinian-Americans in Joe Biden's Jewish-packed government? How about some real talk of equity between Jews who grow ever richer and goyim who grow ever poorer? Super-rich Jewish Supremacists control all the institutions and industries with supremacist sway over us, but we are supposed to believe that the 'supremacist' threat comes from truck drivers and lower-middle class & working class whites who call for fair elections.

The current race-mixing propaganda is about dominating, humiliating, and erasing the white race. It's about the white race reduced to a mere prize or trophy. Like horses, or canines at a dog show. The race-mix message is that White Beauty now belongs to Jews who got all the money and blacks who got the glory as rap stars, athletes, and studs. In other words, Jews and blacks are active agents of power. Jews are in the game of money and influence. Blacks are in the game of celebrity and sports. As white males lost to Jews in the brain-game and lost to blacks in the brawn-game, they should accept their loser-dom. They no longer deserve to keep white women as racial possessions. No, white women are for sale or up for grabs as trophies and prizes for the real winners of America, Jews and blacks.
Trophy or Prize is coveted but passive, not active. Athletes are active. Winners take the trophy. Men in business and institutions are active in the struggle for power. Jewish message is clear. Jews and blacks are active as competitors in the power-grab. Whites, especially white women, are merely passive as trophies. If white men want to play an active role, it must as 'assists' to Jews and blacks, much like Sikhs were sidekicks to the British Imperialists. Active in assistance, not resistance, that is the Rule for Whites according to Jews. No wonder Jewish 'conservatives' tell whites that the Critical Race Theory(pushed by 'progressive' Jews) isn't anti-white but just anti-something-or-the-other. Jews of all stripes feel they must snuff out any spark of white consciousness. Both 'progressive' and 'conservative' Jews insist that white activism must be to ASSIST than RESIST Jewish Supremacism. So, while Jews tirelessly call for RESISTANCE to 'white supremacist' MAGA, whites are supposed to embrace ASSISTANCE to Jewish Power. Even when Jews ravaged Trump's presidency, what did the orange-man clown do? He pardoned Jewish crooks.

Jewish supremacist race-mix message is as follows: "You white guys lost to us in mental power and lost to blacks in muscle-power. So, just be a bunch of dweeby cucks while your women come over to us as our trophies." This is NOTHING NEW. It's the same sexual dynamics of age-old imperialism and conquest. It is like when Spanish men sexually conquered native brown women or when US neo-imperialist G.I.'s turned Vietnam into one big race-mixing whore-house. It's just that the Saigonization is now happening to the white race. This is what the removal of Robert E. Lee statues and Confederate monuments are all about. And there is hardly any resistance from Southern Whites, especially as white men down there are also cucked in their mindless worship of black-dominated college football where Negroes take white women.
This is especially so as Jews pegged the New Morality to idolatry than idealism, a policy as profoundly eventful as the creation of the Petro-Dollar where oil was fixed to the value of the dollar. If the Petro-Dollar meant Oil = US currency, the creation of the Jewgromo(Jewish-Negro-Homo)-Dollar meant Jews, Negroes, Homos = Morality and Spirituality. Moral Currency has been pegged to Jews, blacks, and homos. It isn't about all races bound by same rules and being judged by the same yardstick but about some groups being intrinsically precious whereas others are innately tainted. So, celebrating blacks even as blacks burn down cities and beat up innocent people is deemed 'moral'. Praising Jews and Israel to high heaven even as Jews spread terror and mayhem all across the Middle East and Ukraine is deemed 'moral'. Celebrating homos and trannies even as they turn mainstream culture into one big degenerate infestation is deemed 'moral'. Never mind what these groups do. Whatever they do must be right because their very identities have been pegged to moral righteousness and spiritual sanctity. As a result, the white race isn't merely sexually cucked but spiritually cucked to Jews and blacks(and homos).
Of course, there is ONE way white males can gain some holy 'woke' points but it is as homos who take dongs(often black, as with Andrew Sullivan) up their bungs or as trannies in flowery dresses and pretend to be 'women' despite the hairy chest, pud, and balls. (Jews will favor white male trannies over women because they tend to favor deviant-minority over any natural majority, seek to undermine morale-boosting moral clarity among goyim, and insist that reality is what Jews say it is regardless of any objective truth. Anyone who can make others accept 2 + 2 = 5 despite the obvious truth of 2 + 2 = 4 has awesome power indeed.. like the overlords behind Big Brother Cult in Orwell's 1984.)

DID WHITE PEOPLE INVENT THE IDEA OF RACE?

Jewish Power Strategy contra Chinese Power Strategy — The Jewish Advantage of Using both the STRONG HORSE and the SACRED COW — US Dollar Supremacy in Money and Jewgromo Shekel Supremacy in Morality

Jews know that money power isn't enough. And military power isn't enough either. Jews have plenty of money, and the Jewish-controlled US military is by far the most powerful — Jews control the whore-politicians who order the generals to threaten or attack nations hated by Zionists. Jews have the Strong Horse of money and military power. But to seal the deal, Jews know they also need the Sacred Cow of holiness and righteousness. Indeed, this is where China has failed. China has built up a modern military. Though still dwarfed by US military might, it is a great regional power and growing stronger. Also, China has spread a lot of money around, like Japan in the 1980s. So, China has been growing in Strong Horse capacity. But recently, the Chinese are discovering it's not enough as they're coming under even more condemnation that befell the Japanese in the 80s.

It's true enough that people tend to go with the Strong Horse. But Strong Horse alone offers no moral protections unless matched with the Sacred Cow. If forced to choose between Money Power and Moral Prestige, one will generally choose the latter. (Of course, Moral Prestige is usually associated with Money Power. Would Jews enjoy so much moral sanctity if not for their vast wealth and influence? Besides, Moral Prestige isn't the same as true morality. Rather, it is the advantage of officially sanctioned ethos. In communist nations, Marxism-Leninism had moral prestige. So, even as China can wield money power, its lack of moral prestige can lose friends who dread damage to their reputations by association. Chinese money is nice but not so much if tainted with what is hyped as Chinese vice. It's like the Corleones in THE GODFATHER were tempted with narcotics trade but said NO because of the risk to their reputation. As Vito Corleone said, the politicians would not be his friends if he traded in drugs than merely controlled gambling and the unions. If China is made the bogeyman in a New Cold War, US politicians who'd been chummy with the Chinese will wash their hands and join in the chorus of anti-Chinese rhetoric. If it could be done to Japan, a US ally in the 1980s, it can be done with far greater magnitude against 'communist' China.)

This is where Jewish Power and Chinese Power are different. Jewish Power grew dominant in money and politics, but if Jews learned one thing from history, it's that they need the protection of Sacred Cow power. When Europe was proudly Christian, the Sacred Cow was with Jesus and His flock. If anything, Jews were seen as the Killers of Christ. They were dirty rats than sacred cows. So, even as Jews gained Money Power as merchants, they had little moral protection. The Jewish Strong Horse of big money could win over goy aristocrats, but there was no guarantee of deep loyalty. Suddenly, Jews could be exiled by treacherous goy elites(who couldn't pay back loans to Jews) or attacked by mobs who felt exploited by Jews. And so, especially after World War II, Jews made sure that their Strong Horse of money and privilege would have the moral protection of the Sacred Cow: Shoah-Worship or Holocaustianity as the new faith of the West. In the US, we can berate the rich and condemn the 1% in the name of the 99%, but Jewish power cannot be named. Why? Jews are well-represented in the 1%, but we must pretend they're just rich WHITE people. So, even as rich people and 'white privilege' can be targeted, Jews mustn't be mentioned no matter how rich they are. Thus, the Jewish Strong Horse has Sacred Cow protection. If you dare mention Jewish Power and its dark implications, you are purged as an 'Anti-Semite' and potential 'Nazi', a total no-no.

In contrast, look how Japan and China fared in the American debate. Japan was on the up-and-up in the 1980s. It was flush with cash, and Shintaro Ishihara boasted of a "Japan That Can Say No". Japan seemed a Strong Horse then and attracted much attention, admiration and anxiety. But it also came under heavy criticism and scrutiny, even condemnation. Japan had no Sacred Cow protection, so it was fair game to bash the Japanese. Indeed, Strong Horse power paradoxically undermines itself. While influence and favors can be bought with lotsa money, they also draw negative attention, criticism, and hostility. The more money is used to buy influence, the more suspicion it arouses.

Furthermore, influence bought with money is purely a matter of 'business'. Any partnership based on 'business' can vanish overnight. It used to be a national pastime in goy nations to call attention to Jewish Power buying favors from turncoat gentiles. The more money Jews spent, the more they were called out as financial manipulators. So, buying influence and favors was like a double-edged sword. Jews bought off goy elites but could also be called out as 'dirty Jews'. Also, even goy elites who were bought off felt dirty & compromised and might turn on the Jew at any opportune moment. It was only with the Holocaust Theology following World War II that the Jewish Strong Horse of money had the protection of the Sacred Cow of holy victimhood. Today, Jews are more corrupt than ever, but NO ONE dares to call out on the Jews. Jews ram Donald Trump in the arse, but his response is, "Can I suck your d*** stained with my own shi*?"

Compared to the Jews, Chinese are rank amateurs. Global Hillbillies really. Chinese made some serious cash in the past two decades, and they are now going about it like the Japanese in the 1980s. They brazenly seek influence by throwing money around. Of course, it often goes a long way as people all over the world are eager to take money. It's like the guy in IDIOCRACY says, "I like money."

So, money should never be underestimated. But partnerships based on money are shaky and unstable. It's not like the bond within the family. Chinese nationalists feel a sense of unity and loyalty that goes beyond money. While plenty of Chinese are selfish enough to sell their own nation for thirty pieces of silver — Hong Kong Chinese collaborated with 'foreign devils' in the subjugation and exploitation of China — , there are Chinese patriots whose relation to the motherland isn't simply about money or self-interest. It's like there's a difference between 'personal'/'family' bonds and 'business' interests in THE GODFATHER. It's why Michael Corleone feels especially betrayed by Fredo, a family member.

Chinese got to thinking that they could spread lots of cash around and buy influence in the West. They didn't learn the lesson of Japan in the 1980s. The more influence the Japanese bought, the more they were exposed as alien influence-peddlers. Westerners who took Japanese money were derided as 'Japanhandlers'. When public opinion turned against Japan, one's reputation suffered as a 'Japanhandler'. Being bought off by the Japanese led to short-term gain but could mean long-term loss. The money was good but at the risk of being castigated as a whore of yellow peril. Jewish Hollywood even made RISING SUN based on Michael Crichton's novel. (It was like JAP SUSS modeled on Veit Harlan's JEW SUSS.)

JEW SUSS by Veit Harlan

And now, we are seeing a similar implosion of Chinese influence in the West, especially in the Anglosphere of US, UK, Canada, and Australia. Chinese used big money to gain influence, but it only exposed them to China-bashers calling out on the 'Chi-Coms'. (East Asians, not a very verbal people, often settle issues with money, and this comes across as underhanded in Western eyes. In contrast, Jews not only pay but have much to say, thereby coming across as more justified and righteous in what they do. Chinese only bribe, whereas Jews follow up the bribe with the diatribe to morally intimidate potential critics of Jews.)
There is a limit to what the Strong Horse of money can do. It can gain entry but is resented as a usurper. Besides, even as China has the Strong Horse of money, its military capability is still far behind that of US that virtually owns Taiwan and other 'Asian Tiger' nations as neo-protectorates. US got both the bigger carrot and the bigger stick. So far, Chinese can only buy influence with money, and it goes a long way but not all the way. Indeed, the Chinese Strong Horse is now being exposed as a Trojan Horse.

In the case of Australia, all the influence-peddling with money seems to have done more harm than good. Initially, China gained key access down under, but it also drew negative attention from the US(that can tolerate China as an economic power but not as a world player) and ordinary Aussies who feel their nation is being sold out to the Chinese. Furthermore, anti-Chinese bashing serves as an outlet for growing white frustration resulting from Politically Correct taboos against criticism of Jews and blacks(and homos). Therefore, because whites must always suck up to Jewish Power(that is hostile to white identity & interests), grovel before blacks(who commit lots of crime and violence against whites), and homos(who degrade culture and morality), they are desperate to release their frustrations on something. As there is no taboo against bashing China, many whites blame the 'Chi-Coms' for everything. It's like Alex Jones in the US got deplatformed by Jews but howls about the Chinese 24/7. And even as Rush Limbaugh praised Walmart as a model of American Enterprise, he dumped on the 'Chi-Coms'. Never mind Walmart's success owes to its contract with China. Go easy on US corporations and just blame the Chinese.

The Covid Hysteria seems largely the result of Chinese and Jews. The virus might have originated in China, maybe due to government neglect. But, it was blown all out of proportion by the Western Media and governments because Jewish Power found it useful to undermine Trump's economy(thereby ruining his prospect for re-election) and to grab statist power to suppress populist movements and political activism(unless it happened to be Jewish-favored ones like BLM marches and Antifa mayhem). Nazis associated with germs & pathogens with Jewish influence, and Jewish Power's use of Covid Hysteria has created the illusion that Trumpism & Era of Nationalist Populism = Disease and Plague. 

So, both China and Jewish Power are responsible for Covid being hyped as a 'pandemic'. But, notice China is getting all the blame. Even Biden-voters blame China for Covid. China gets all the blame while Jews get no blame(even though Jewish Power blocked early attempts by Donald Trump to restrict travel between China and US and also hyped it all out of proportion to shut down entire sectors). Jews remain blameless whereas China is blamed for the 'China Virus'. So, even though Chinese played the junior partner alongside Jews against Trump and his supporters, they are getting almost all the blame. 

At any rate, the terms of the Jewish-Chinese alliances is such that the Chinese do the bidding of Jews but also serve as the Fall Guy while the Jew goes unblamed. If a Jew and a Chinese plotted to steal honey from bees, the Jew would tell the Chinese to go at the bee hive. Both would get the honey, but the Chinese guy would also get the stings while the Jew would only get the honey. Chinese seem to think that their partnership with Jews will lead to Jews defending China, but that's naivete on their part. Japan during WWII treated Jews well in the hope that Jewish-Americans would feel grateful and intercede on its behalf, but it was misplaced hope. Jews invented the atomic bomb that blew up Japan. Likewise, Chinese are foolish if they think Jews will offer them protection in exchange for Chinese helping out the Jews. No, even as Jews take full advantage of the Jewish-Chinese partnership against whites, they expose China as the culprit because the bulk of Western anger at globalism will be directed toward the Chinese than to the Jews(who are its real architects and captains).

Basic strategy seems as follows. So-called 'Liberal' Jews work with Chinese to undermine American Nationalism. Of course, Jews support their own nationalism, Zionism, and their own tribal identity/interests, but they detest and subvert goy national identities and interests. So, nationalism is all very well for Israel(and the West is compelled to support the Jewish State, or else be accused of 'antisemitism', as Jeremy Corbyn of UK found out), but any desire on the part of goyim to preserve national identity and borders is denounced as 'far right' or 'xenophobic'. So, Jews say the West must support ultra-nationalist Israel but condemn Hungary for wanting to preserve its people and culture. Just like Jews believe their God is the only true God while all other gods are false, they believe their own identity is the only true identity whereas soulless and faceless goyim exist only to serve Jews. (Notice that children of Jews and Chinese are Jews first and Chinese second. Chinese-ness is subservient and secondary to Jewishness. Just ask Amy Chua who used her Chinese womb to create Jewish kids.) As the US has been majority white Christian, Jews have made alliances with ANY group to weaken white identity & unity and Christian Culture. Chinese have played along with the Jews to make gains in the West because Chinese believe Jews are the true boss of the West.

The Chinese Believe That the Jews Control America. Is That a Good Thing?

But even as 'liberal' Jews push this agenda in cahoots with the Chinese, 'conservative' Jews rant about how China is taking over the world and has spies all over America. So, China gets ALL THE BLAME for globalism's impact on America. And one senses that 'liberal' Jews and 'conservative' Jews are working together behind the scenes. After all, 'liberal' Jews control the media and academia in the West, but they never condemn 'conservative' Jews for ramping up 'yellow peril' hysteria. People like Ezra Levant in Canada and Michael Savage in the US are given free rein to sound the alarm about 'Chinese are coming, Chinese are coming'. So, 'liberal' Jews work with Chinese to subvert American Nationalism but also enable 'conservative' Jews who blame China but never Jews for the globalist agenda. Consider the two articles below: One shows how 'liberal' Wall Street Jews have long worked with China against the US. In contrast, Jews like Ezra Levant and Zionist-controlled Breitbart News spread alarm about how Chinese are taking over everything. 

Chinese Official: We Subvert America Through Wall Street Jews

Documents Reveal Canada Planned Winter Training with Chinese Troops; Canceled After U.S. Request

There are many more Chinese than Jews, but quantity isn't everything. In a way, Jews always had a Sacred Cow mentality along with the Strong Horse Strategy; the Sacred Cow among Jews was the Covenant, the sense of the Chosen. So, when it came to the Strong Horse Strategy, Jews only pretended to go with the goy Strong Horse. Even as the Jewish body was serving the goy Strong Horse(be it Anglo, German, Russian, French, or whatever), the Jewish soul remained loyal to the Sacred Cow of Jewish Identity. In other words, even as Jewish eyes and ears could be impressed by Gentile power, the Jewish Soul didn't surrender to the Other. If anything, Jews served the goy Strong Horse to gain more power for themselves and grow their own Strong Horse to be trained to eventually outrace the Goy Strong Horse(like in BEN-HUR) and serve the Jewish Soul. In time, Jews would make goyim serve the Jewish Strong Horse as well. Today, goyim in the US are total servants to Jewish Supremacist Power.

TRIBUTE TO THE 'GREAT AMERICAN PATRIOT' SHELDON ADELSON

In contrast, Chinese only have a Strong Horse strategy. There is no sacred cow mentality. (Chinese were feng-shui superstitious about the world around them but didn't develop a sacred sense of the Chinese soul.) Ideally, they'd like to be the Strong Horse and have others revolve around the Chinese(as the Middle Kingdom). But if they can't be the Strong Horse, they'd rather follow whatever happens to be the Strong Horse, even if it isn't Chinese. Now, Chinese Culture, steeped in Confucian tradition, has a sense of goodness apart from power and wealth, but it's mostly about manners than about ethno-spiritual identity, which is what Jews have. Manners are not strong enough to hold an identity together. If anything, it tends to divide a people along class lines: Snobs and slobs. Chinese also have Taoism, but it's about man's ego yielding to the Way. It is an emasculating kind of spirituality. If the Jewish Covenant concentrates the power of the universe in Jewish Identity as the Chosen of God, the creator and ruler of all, Taoism tends to dissolve Chinese ego in vague musings about the 'harmony'. At any rate, in Confucian vs the Covenant, the Covenant wins.

Because Jews have both Strong Horse Strategy and Sacred Cow Mentality, even their service to the goy Strong Horse eventually serves Jewish Identity, which is sacred to Jews. Also, Jews are BORN with the Covenant. It is innate. In contrast, Confucian-based sense of the higher good isn't something one is born with but must attain through education and refinement. Thus, it doesn't apply to all Chinese but only to those with the good fortune of higher education and social elevation. Also, this East Asian emphasis on education-as-the-path-to-respectability means that the Chinese are easily molded by whomever is doing the educating. So, under the Old Order, they strove to be proper Confucians. Under Mao, they were fervent communists. And Chinese in the Current West become servile students of globo-homo, BLM nonsense, and Jew-worship, the new holy trinity of the West. Because their own identity isn't prized as a sacred cow(like Jewish identity is for Jews who are steeped in Covenant Mentality), Chinese are likely to go along with whatever happens to be the Strong Horse. Plenty of Chinese who see the West as the Strong Horse and Sacred Cow(or the 'shining city on the hill') will gladly work for the West against their ancestral nation. Indeed, consider all those Chinese women who use their Chinese wombs to produce Jewish babies for Jewish men. Chinese bodies not only work for Jews but function to produce new life for Jews than for Chinese.

So, whereas Jews in disadvantageous situations may submit their bodies to the goy Strong Horse but never surrender their souls, Chinese will submit their bodies and surrender their souls to the Strong Horse even if it is non-Chinese or anti-Chinese. Look at all the Chinese cucks sucking up to the West in Hong Kong and Taiwan. They are like the worthless Dumb Polacks who'd gladly sell out Poland because they adulate the Jewish-run West as the Strong Horse.
Though the first Chinese arrivals in the West might feel some loyalty to the Mother Country, their children are destined to become agents of Globo-Homo, Jewish Power, and Negro-worship because their parents raise them to follow, obey, and serve the Strong Horse, which currently happens to be owned by Jews. (The Chinese sense of loyalty to family works only in close-knit local communities. In the mobile modern world, people need a powerful sense of ethnic solidarity or national identity to maintain a lasting sense of loyalty. But as East Asians favor class over race, they are more likely to betray their own kind for personal gain. In contrast, the Jewish Covenant is about race/blood than about class. A Jew, rich or poor, is equally holy within the Covenant. A successful Jew doesn't despise a less fortunate Jew like a successful East Asian looks down on the less fortunate among his own kind. It's why Israel's suicide rate is far lower than that of East Asia where the less successful are made to feel worthless.)
As long as Jews control the West, Chinese and Asians in general will serve as anti-white agents to gain approval from their Jewish Masters. Jews love to use 'diversity' against whites. When White Christians controlled the West long ago, many Chinese in the West converted to Christianity and emulated white power. But as whites now cuck to Jews, Chinese in the West also cuck to Jews. And if Jews tell Chinese to be anti-white, Chinese will be anti-white. This is useful to Jews as they then go to whites and say, "Look at all those anti-white Chinese", which makes whites bark back at the Chinese but never at the Jews who encourage anti-white attitude among the Chinese(and other non-white groups).

If Chinese were cleverer, they would have pushed both the Strong Horse and the Sacred Cow strategies on the West, much like what the Jews did, especially after World War II. Jews used lots of dollars but also placed Holocaust at the center of Western Conscience. As China came under Western Aggression, the Chinese could have balanced Money Power with Moral Narrative of China's degradation at the hands of the West. Thus, Chinese Suffering might have gained a degree of Sacred Cow status.
But, Chinese chose to morally target the Japanese, especially concerning the Nanking Massacre. Even Chinese in the West made more fuss about evil Japanese than about Western Aggression. Iris Chang in the US wrote a book about Japanese killing bushels of Chinese. And Jung Chang, married to some Briton and authoress of MAO, seems most hateful toward Mainland China than anything else. As such, the Chinese failed to exploit the cult of Chinese-victimhood. Notice China hasn't made any big movie about its humiliation by Western Imperialists. China made a movie called CITY OF LIFE AND DEATH about Japanese atrocities in Nanking but did nothing to promote 'Western Guilt' in China's tragedy in the 20th century. And even the guilt-baiting of Japan didn't work as Japan could reliably look to the West to back it up against China. In contrast, Germans can't rely on the West to back it up against Jews because Jews control the West. When Chinese say to Japanese, "You Japs no good", the US will side with Japan against China. But when Jews say, "You Krauts suck", the Jewish-ruled US will also tell Germans, "Yeah, you Krauts suck, so pony up and pay more shekels to Jews, or else!"

Jews can use their Strong Horse to trample on the West, but they are protected by the Sacred Cow of Shoah Narrative and 'white guilt' about Jews. In contrast, when Chinese use their Strong Horse of newly minted Money Power, they have no similar recourse to suppress anti-Chinese criticism as there is zero Western guilt about the Chinese. Most people in the West know nothing of the Chinese Tragedy in the past 200 yrs, and they're more likely to think of Chinese as dog-eating & cat-boiling sadists who got whupped by 'Japs' who were then crushed by the Americans in the Good War. Because the US beat Japan that battered China, most Americans think Chinese owe everything to Americans. Americans overlook the part about how Europeans and Americans emboldened and built up Modern Japan and invited it into the Imperialist Club. And of course, Jews say nothing about how the Jewish Sassoon Dynasty sold the bulk of opium to the Chinese, but then the Chinese don't press this point either as they are so eager to work with Jews as the Strongest Horse. If anything, Jews now fund 'libertarian' thinkers who say China's opium problem was vastly exaggerated. They are like the paid shills who downplay the harm done to white working class by opioids peddled by the Jewish Sackler Family.

It goes to show that Financial Currency isn't enough. The Sacred Cow of Moral Currency is also crucial. There's been some talk of the Euro, the Yuan, or the combination of Yuan and other currencies challenging the supremacy of the Dollar, but the Dollar is still supreme and will be for the foreseeable future. So, even nations with troubled relations with the US must accumulate dollars to do business around the world. They need dollars to buy oil and other essential goods and materials. This is a case of Strong Horse power. Money Supremacy by the US. But, financial power is not a Sacred Cow. So, even as peoples around the world must take part in Dollar Domination, they can express resentment and denounce it as unfair and unjust.

In contrast, the currency of Moral Supremacism has Sacred Cow power. It comes with taboos attached. Jews, as the masters of the US, not only enjoy Dollar Supremacism over the world but, as masters of media and academia, also enjoy the supremacy of their own chosen Moral Currency, which revolves around Sacred Jews, Holy Homos, and Magic Negroes. One reason why Jews seek to fill the world with Holocaust Narratives, Globo-Homo 'pride' parades, and BLM agit-prop is to unify the world under a single Moral Currency of Tri-Supremacism of the Holy Three who matter most: Jews, blacks, and homos. 

This way, most people's moral currencies(based on their own tragic narratives) don't go very far, just like most national currencies have limited use value. Local currencies must be exchanged into dollars to have global worth. Likewise, local folks must obtain Tri-Supremacist moral-shekels to curry favor with the US Empire that rules the world. For instance, Armenians won't get far by griping about victimhood under Turks and Azerbaijanis. They are better off putting on a 'gay pride' parade or putting up BLM signs. Or, building a Holocaust Memorial even though Armenians had nothing to do with the Shoah. The fact is Armenians don't matter much in the moral constellation configured by Jews. Indeed, it was no problem when Obama reneged on the pledge to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide in favor of maintaining good relations between the US and Turkey. If any people want to gain globo-'moral worth', they are better off spouting off about the Holocaust, wonders of homosexuality, and how BLM is so important(even though they had nothing to do with the African Slave Trade) because those three obsessions have the most value as moral currency in the West controlled by Jews.
Global Morality is really about the Imperialism of Western Consciousness and White Guilt. So, if the West feels special sympathy or reverence for Jews, blacks, and homos, then the rest of the world must also strive to gain moral credence by earning 'woke' shekels minted on notions of Sacred Jews, Holy Homos, and Magic Negroes. Such shekels are to World Morality what the US Dollar is to World Currency. Not all is fair and equal in the Moral Exchange Rate. Why is Mandela treated like a saint-prophet while Arafat has been memory-holed even though their struggles were so similar? Why was apartheid so evil in South Africa, but it's okay when Jews do it to Palestinians in the West Bank? It's because Jews and blacks morally count for more than Arabs and Palestinians. Indeed, many Arabs in the Emirates are now cutting a deal with Israel because the world doesn't care about the plight of Arabs or Muslims.

Pakistani-American kid got admitted to an elite college by writing nothing but 'Black Lives Matter' a hundred times on the admissions essay. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/teen-accepted-stanford-after-writing-blacklivesmatter-100-times-application-n742586 He didn't write "Muslim Lives Matter" or "Pakistani Lives Matter" even though he is of Muslim background and from a region in which US power has done so much damage — after all, while the US police kills a handful of black criminals every year, the US military kills many thousands of Arabs/Muslims for the sake of Zionist Supremacy. So, shouldn't the kid have pressed on the matter of "Muslim Lives Matter"? Alas, such wouldn't have gotten him very far because Muslim or Pakistani identity doesn't have much exchange value in the Moral Marketplace. But even if you're not black, saying "black lives matter" can earn you some 'moral' credit because blacks are part of the Tri-Supremacist Holy Three.

Likewise, white politicians get nowhere by extolling the tragic histories of the Irish, Polish, Italians, Latvians, or whatever. And one's sure to go morally bankrupt if he dares to spout morally-charged narratives about gentiles exploited by Jews or mass-killed by Jewish Bolsheviks. If white politicians want some 'woke' currency, the best bet is to gush about Jewish wonderfulness, 'Muh Israel', and, of course, the Holocaust as the worst thing that ever happened since the Big Bang. 

White Supremacism is out, but White SAPremacism is in. Whites must be saps before Jews and their chosen allies, homos and blacks. And this SAPremacism serves as the template for the rest of the world. So, if you want to succeed as a Hindu or Chinese in the West, don't bother griping about Hindu tragedy or Chinese suffering. No one cares about Hindu or Chinese lives, which have little moral exchange value. You must trade the tragic narratives of your own folks with the Tri-Supremacist shekels of Jew-Negro-Homo or Jewgromo Worship. Whites must act as saps before Jews, blacks, and homos to climb the ladder, and the rest of the world has to emulate White Sappery. Look at those Asians in Canada waving the homo flag and speaking/gesticulating in black lingo & 'attitude' to gain moral currency. As they matter little as Asians, they invoke blackness and homo vanity. And if they want to rise up in elite institutions, they are obligated to pay respect to Jewish Tragedy and Homo wonderfulness because their own identities and narratives have little value in the Tri-Supremacist Moral Currency System. A Chinese goes nowhere saying, "I love China and am proud to be Chinese", but he or she might get somewhere by exclaiming, "I revere Jews", "I love blacks", and "I worship homos".

CHINA AND AUSTRALIA FACE OFF IN ESCALATING TRADE WAR - The Duran: News - Video - Analysis 2020: THE ESTABLISHMENT STRIKES BACK by Black Pigeon Speaks

What's in a Word: The Politicization of the Term APPEASEMENT — In the Current Order, If You Appease Jewish Supremacism, You're Not an 'Appeaser', but If You Call for Reasoned Negotiations with Those Hated by Jews, You Are an 'Appeaser'... funny how that works

THE HUGE DEMOCRAT PARTY COUP by Brother Nathanael

A clear case of the Power of the Word is 'appeasement'. When it is and when it is not an appeasement? It's like 'hate'. When Jews hate you, it's not hate. But if you're even mildly critical of Jews, you might be a 'hater'. And what is 'extreme'? These days, a man with a big chunky pair of balls who claims to be a woman is a 'woman'. That is the New Normal. But a conservative(or a lesbian/feminist) who might disagree could be branded as 'extreme'. Once, you had to be Nazi-like to be 'extreme'. But now, the mere desire of Hungarians to preserve their national integrity is condemned as 'extreme' and 'far right'. But then, when Jews are truly zealous of their identity, heritage, and territory in Israel, we must all get behind the Tribe. If you criticize Zionism or call for a measure of justice for Palestinians, you get smeared like Jeremy Corbyn. You are either an 'Anti-Semite' or harboring it among your flock.

Back to 'appeasement'. It's a famous(and even infamous) term usually associated with the supposed wimps and weaklings who caved to Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. Say the word 'appeasement', and Neville Chamberlain's deal with Hitler will come to mind. In the West, it's also been used to smear those who call for constructive dialogue with Iran(because, of course, whatever Jews hate is the 'new hitler'). Neocon Jews and their cuck-puppets never tire of denouncing others as akin to the craven cowards who cut a deal with Hitler. So, acknowledgement of Iran's legitimate interests is tantamount to repeating the mistakes of 1939 and paving the way for more horrors, maybe even Another Holocaust!

'Appeasement', like 'phobia', is not a neutral or objective term. It is judgmental and condemnatory. If someone is said to be 'phobic', it means his fears are utterly irrational, unfounded, and pathological. So, if someone is opposed to non-stop immigration that might forever transform the character of his homeland, he isn't a patriot with sound anxieties but a bigot with sickness in his head(and soul): A 'xenophobe'. Likewise, 'appeasement' isn't merely negotiation or compromise but a craven bargain with the devil. Of course, the accusation can come from any side. After all, German critics of Hitler could have argued Der Fuhrer appeased the British and the French in promising not to press for more German territories lost in World War I in exchange for Chamberlain's acceptance of German fait accompli in Czech Territory.

Because the term 'appeasement' is so judgmental, historians should be careful in its use. It is more a form of editorializing than understanding. The term is problematic even within its own definition. After all, if 'to appease' means: To placate or attempt to placate (a threatening nation, for example) by granting concessions, often at the expense of principle", then it is an all-too-common occurrence. Power differentials are a fact of life as most parties in any situation are not equal. Some are richer, better connected, more prestigious, more influential, and more powerful. So, it's often the case that the weaker party has to make concessions to the powerful side. But, most such interactions or transactions are not called 'appeasement'. So, even appeasement isn't 'appeasement' if it's approved by the Power/System or the established way of doing business.

What is the most powerful group in the US? It's the Jews, and so much of US politics, economics, and social policy is about non-Jews sucking up to Jews. Politicians suck up to the demands of Wall Street and the Donor Class, both heavily Jewish. Anyone who wants to work in Hollywood has to suck up to Zionists. Mutter something about BDS or criticism of Jewish Power, and you shall be blacklisted. US politicians of European backgrounds never make pilgrimages to their own ancestral homelands. Rather, they go to Israel, put on a yarmulke, and stand before the Wailing Wall. They all suck up to Jews by invoking the memory of the Shoah while ignoring most other horrors of the 20th century or any other era. US politicians shill for Israel and spew hatred against Iran. They stand in line outside AIPAC as willing lackeys for More Wars for Israel. All such behaviors certainly qualify as acts of appeasement but are never called out as such by the Big Media and Big Academia that are controlled by Jews.
Appeasing Jewish Power is so approved and 'normal' in US politics that it's never slapped with the seal of 'appeasement'. Indeed, it's become so second-nature to Americans that they're blind to their own craven cuckery. After 2020 election, you'd think American Conservatives would finally wake up to Jewish Power. Trump surely appeased the Jews a thousand times but got rammed in the arse just the same. In other words, 'With Jews, you lose'. But all we get from The Donald is more appeasement to Neocons who threaten Iran and all we get from Trumpeteers is 'China, China, China'. Never mind China too was in the business of appeasing the Jews as the go-to ruling elites of the US. The bargain was China would get a piece of the pie if it aided Jews in the demise of white identity and power.

Apparently, 'appeasement', like 'Hate', is always something done by people, regime, or nation that happens to be disapproved by the Power — when Jews hate(Russia, White Christians, Syrians, Arabs, Palestinians, Hungarians, etc.), it's never called hate. While it's been said a million times that Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler, it's hardly been mentioned that Winston Churchill(and FDR) appeased Joseph Stalin by conceding all of Eastern Europe to the Iron Curtain. After all, Churchill and FDR are still remembered as great men. Richard Nixon was much lauded for meeting with Mao Zedong. It wasn't called an appeasement of a Red Monster. But the merest sign of Trump wanting to work with Vladimir Putin was condemned as 'appeasement' of 'Putler'. But then, the GOP cucks called Obama's deal with Iran as 'appeasement', once again invoking World War II, even though Obama did it under the control of J-Street Jews who were seeking to ease Iran out of the Russia-China orbit. GOP cucks misled the public with the charge that the US under Obama funneled billions upon billions of US taxpayer money to Iran when the money was Iran's own that had been frozen in the US.

In the West, there are two kinds of appeasement. There are those who appease Jews in the most pathetic and shameless manner. John McCain was champion at this, but most GOP and Democratic politicians are top contenders. They know all the doggy tricks. This might be called 'positive appeasement'. But there is another kind that might be called 'negative appeasement'. Take Rand Paul. While he often displeases Jewish Power by refusing to back every War for Israel, he won't call out on Jewish Power. He turns every discussion or policy issue into an abstract discussion of principles and the Constitution. But current events and prevailing trends cannot be understood apart from the hypocrisy of Jewish Power that yammers about 'equity' and 'social justice', all the while pushing for policies that only make Jews even richer and make Israel even more dominant in the Middle East.

In a fair world, nothing should be called 'appeasement' or anything fitting the description should be thus labeled. So, if what Chamberlain did was appeasement, so was Churchill's deal with Stalin. And all the minor nations and powers within the US empire should also be called appeasers. What does Europe do nowadays but constantly appease the US that is controlled by Jews? Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and etc. are appeasers of the US empire. Colombia is a suck-ass appeaser of US power. And US politicians are mostly craven appeasers of Jewish Power.
But, the term is used selectively to demean ONLY THOSE who concede in a manner that is disapproved by Jewish-controlled US empire that shapes the narrative and discourse around the world via its lock on academia and media and deep state.

Appeasing Jewish Power means one must also appease whatever is favored by Jews. So, if Jews say BLM, one must appease black thuggery as the 'new sainthood'. Even though blacks are the most violent criminal class in the US, one must sing hosannas to magic blackness. And of course, the homos. Jewish Power promoted holy homos, and that means one mustn't upset homos lest he also displease Jews who must be appeased at all times. Jews are the 'Made Men' of US power, and that means the only functional 'law' of the land is Whatever Jews Want. Appease globo-homo. Sodomy is the new god, or godomy. Jews demand it, so you better obey. If a tranny says he's a woman, you better use 'proper pronouns' where he is a 'she' or even a 'they'. Surely, powerful Jews are cracking up behind closed doors at the sheer stupidity and/or cowardice of goyim.

So, we have a situation where everyone must appease the Jews in order not to be labeled an 'appeaser'. It's like one must hate whatever Jews hate in order not to be called a 'hater'. And it's not enough that most people in the West appease Jews. There are still some who say the US should be on better terms with Russia or some nation hated by Jews, and that is lambasted as 'appeasement'. Jewish Power is like a jealous god that says "Ours Only". Everyone must appease the Jews, but that is not appeasement apparently. But if you dare suggest that US negotiate or compromise with any side hated by Jews, you are a damn 'appeaser'! What a rotten state of affairs.

In the current order, your appeasement is not appeasement if it's approved by the Power. But even if you don't appease but call for negotiations or dialogue with a side hated by Jews, you are an 'appeaser'. If you smooch the Jewish Supremacist Ass, you're not an appeaser. But if you merely call for the end of the illegal US occupation of Syria, you are 'appeasing' Assad the 'butcher of Syria'.

Just like the US dollar is the world currency, Jewish Outrage of Tri-Supremacism(centered on Jews, Negroes, and Homos) has become the world moral currency. The only way to earn 'woke' currency is by appeasing the supremacism of Jews, megalomania of Negroes, and vanity of homos. Thus, every European nation has a Holocaust Museum, and homo prides are spreading around the world to showcase that "Our nation has accepted Gayspel as the new gospel'. Or even nations without blacks or black problems make a fuss with BLM to show they are with the program.

Western elites are worse than ever because the terms of elite selection favors the supremacists among the Jews but saps and flunkies among whites. A Jew who is conscientious and critical of Jewish Power hardly gets anywhere. Just ask Norman Finkelstein who couldn't even secure a gig at second-tier college DePaul. A Jew has to be supremacist to make his way to the top. But when it comes to whites, anyone exhibiting any independence of thought or anything resembling courage/integrity is struck down. He's not even admitted to elite college if, for example, he posted something on Twitter or Facebook that might displease Jews, homos, or blacks. That means the kind of whites who rise to the top are saphead cucks who go along to get along. They may still be smart and capable, but they are born appeasers and toadies than mavericks and men of independence. In other words, the likes of Mitt Romney, John McCain, Ben Sasse, Brian Kemp, Paul Ryan, and etc. are allowed to rise to the top. (It's an Asianization of the West. In the East, exams are treated as an end than a means to an end. Exams aren't so much a gauge of success as success itself. So, Asians don't think independently but merely study whatever is approved to pass the exams as proof of their success. In the quasi-Confucian Neo-West, whites must pass the PC exam of approved thought than think independently. Millennials grew up to favor approval of thought than independence of thought.) So, the result is a system run by sniveling Jewish supremacist masters and groveling white goy cuck dogs. But, we are told that white cuckery isn't appeasement because Jews control the narrative and decide what is what.

The Huge Democrat Party Coup by Brother Nathanael

Tug-A-Gro — Why Leftism, Jews, and Negroes grow More Powerful in the Clash of Civilizations and Empires — Jewish Media Domination elevated Jews, Homos, & Blacks uber alles, and so, All Nations, rightist or leftist, globalist or anti-globalist, use the Moral Currency of Rhapsodizing over Jews, Blacks, and/or Homos

https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russian-libs-owned/

Nonetheless, it was also something of an aha moment along the lines of what I encountered in Berkeley c.2013, as more than ever I realized that Russian SJWs do exist and not just on Twitter.

One reason why SJW-ism spread all over the world isn't merely due to Jewish Media Global domination. It's because even anti-American and anti-globalist governments and nations employ SJW talking points as counter-propaganda against the US(and the West).

Consider Chinese who say 'black lives matter'. Why? Because it's an easy talking point to shame the US that is always criticizing, excoriating, and condemning other nations for its 'human rights abuses'. So naturally, to get back at the US, even anti-American nations will strike at America's Achilles Heel by invoking 'woke' tropes. In a way, most criticisms of other regimes, societies, and nations tend to be 'leftish' in character regardless of the political orientation of the regime in charge. Why? Leftism is about complaints, whereas rightism is about appreciation and reverence. While leftism does have its heroes and saints to revere, it is fundamentally founded on discontent with reality, the system, the order, and etc. It is naturally more polemical than the right. So, the easiest way to discredit or undermine another system is by pointing out all the flaws. And in this, even right-wing regimes end up playing the 'leftist' game. Whether the Soviet Union or reconstituted Russia, an easy propaganda coup to smear the US has been by pointing out its racial problems, especially pertaining to blacks. Soviets made it seem like USSR is the land of the free and equal whereas the US was a nation of rich and poor, white power and black misery. And watch some RT news today, and it often pushes 'leftist' talking points. Of course, not so much about Russia but about the West. It hires Western 'liberals' and 'leftists' because they make the most reliable attack dogs against the West itself. Like Chris Hedges who sees the US as one big penal colony and something out of the movie BRAZIL.

Now, one can criticize a nation, people, culture, or system from the rightist perspective, but rightist energy isn't about complaining 24/7. Even the purity spirals of Christianity are more 'leftist' in character. Conservative Christianity is more about acceptance and resignation and preservation of the status quo. It's Radical Christianity that is 'triggered' by how much the Church has fallen or isn't doing enough. In Martin Luther's time, this had a salutary effect as Protestant Reformers were serious theologians on the meaning of Christ. In today's world, with Christianity remaining as a mere shell in the West, most so-called Christians are really post-Christians who believe the church has relevance merely as a homeless shelter or outpost for various causes with higher 'spiritual' prestige(as decided by Jewish Power that controls the Narrative). As the main faith in the West is now Jews-Homos-Negroes and Diversity(though secondary to Jews-Homos-Negroes), so many churches feel they must accommodate to serving those holy themes. The 'conservative' churches tend to stick closer to the traditional faith but even they are more into Jew-worship than God-worship. What is the #1 theme of Evangelicalism? 'Muh Israel'. And as even Evangelicals are beginning to soften on the Homo issue and get all worked up over 'racism', it's becoming just another kind of SJW church.

Who are the main beneficiaries of all this? Jews and Negroes. On Jews, the argument between Russia and US isn't about pro-Jews vs anti-Jews but about pro-pro-pro-Jews vs pro-pro-pro-pro-Jews. It's a game of which side is more pro-Jewish. Russia will say it defeated Nazism, saved Jews, protects Jews, and has close ties with Israel. US will say it is about loving Jews, remembering Holocaust, and protecting Jews from 'antisemitism'. Now, given that Jews have really messed up Russia with both communism and gangster capitalism, Russia should be anti-Jewish. And US should have woken up by now that Jews are a hostile minority. But as Jews have such media and financial control, all sides feel they must justify themselves as the biggest enemy of 'antisemitism'... or else be condemned as 'nazis'. So, even as the Jews went about undermining Trump and Russia, all we hear from both sides is 'we love Jews'. Tug-of-Schwarz.
And Negroes are also great beneficiaries. From the US side, so much is made of how the nation has come a long way from the dark yrs of slavery and Jim Crow. US uses the black issue as a huge point of pride. "We were once bad to blacks, but now, we see how magical they are and elevate them to demigod status. We love Negroes!!!" But as blacks continue to be socially mired in poverty and complain so much about 'white supremacist' America, nations like Russia, China, Iran, and others jump at the chance of saying, "WE CARE ABOUT THEM POOR HELPLESS NEGROES who are so oppressed, exploited, and mistreated in the 'racist' and 'white supremacist' US." As a result, both white Americans and peoples abroad come under the spell of Negrolatry. White Americans want to take pride in having come a long way and rolling out the red carpet for the Negroes. And 'enemy nations' of America want to take pride in standing up for Negroes as the perennial victims of American 'racism' and white supremacy. Indeed, whether a nation is rightist or leftist, what easier way to rhetorically strike back at the US than by invoking the Black Issue? After all, whereas Jews are super-rich and homos are very privileged in the US, many blacks are still doing poorly. Now, we know why. Blacks are tougher, more impulsive, more given to psychopathy, and less intelligent. That means black frustration with life will often turn to crime and violence and scaring whitey. But many Russians and Chinese only know about Black American Reality through Western Propaganda.

The current West(led by the US) is the most schizo kind of empire ever. Traditionally, empires totally took pride in their imperial glory. This was true of British Empire, Ottoman Empire, and Soviet Empire. Granted, the British Empire did have second thoughts and something like a conscience, as it eventually worked to end the slave trade and the sale of opium. Still, for most of its existence, it was about power and glory. The Soviet Empire was based on leftist ideology, but under Leninism-Stalinism, it allowed no criticism of the Revolution and the System. As such, it was about total revolutionary pride and almost zilch self-criticism.
In contrast, the US empire, though extremely aggressive and arrogant, has as its foundation a kind of self-loathing. US has the most powerful military, biggest economy, and the most aggressive financial imperialism around the world, but so much of US narrative is "US history sucks cuz of 'racism'", "Christianity sucks because of 'homophobia'", "white men are rapists of coeds", "white people are a**holes, white privilege is evil, white fragility is problematic, etc." White America has been the Core America from the beginning, but it is constantly attacked, berated, demeaned, insulted, and humiliated. And as youngsters are impressionable, so many white kids have internalized these propaganda points pushed by Jews.
In a way, one might say US is a very proud and robust empire in that there is no criticism of Jewish Power, the top power that rules. US is about Jews, Jews, Jews and 'muh Israel' from the elites of both parties. In that sense, US empire is like empires of old: It is indeed about the power and glory of Jews. But the neo-imperial narrative is rarely about what the US is really about: Jewish Hegemonic pride. But then, Jews are only 2% of the population and very nervous as rulers. Can an empire sustain itself by elevating the 2% over the majority of whites? Or, are Jews fixing to use Diversity as New Majority as its loyal servants? But can Diversity be as reliable as white cucks and as competent? An empire that glorifies the great majority is surely more stable than one that glorifies a tiny minority. After all, British Imperialist prestige was more stable in the mother country of UK than in India where the British elites had to keep Hindu identity and pride suppressed as a 'national identity'.

But on the other hand, clever Jews may have come upon a formidable formula for empire. After all, what was one of the major reasons for the fall of empires? The subject peoples eventually tired of the occupying power and began to resist. So, the British, French, and Ottoman empires fell apart. But what if an empire erases all notions of conquering people and subject peoples? In other words, while the US military may invade other nations and dominate much of the world, peoples from all over the world can come to the US and become 'Americans'. Or they can go to Europe and become 'Europeans'. Thus, if old empires were a one-way street in the flow of power, the new empire is a two-way street. 'Invade-Invite' means both worlds get transformed. US changes the world with bombs and money, but the world changes the US as immigrant hordes and new elites. In time, they join in the metropole, enter the military, become professors & journalists, and etc. Indeed, consider how so many Third World elites are now pro-imperialist than anti-imperialist. They figure more Western access to their nations means more access to the West on their part. "They take from us, but we take from them." Also, there's the sense that "they criticize us for our human rights problems, but they are also busy criticizing themselves for their human rights problems. Indeed, white professors teach our children to criticize and condemn white supremacism and white racism." (Now, one may argue that the Soviets pioneered this kind of empire, one where Russians had no special privileges over other peoples. A Russian could lord over others, but others could lord over Russians. It was an empire of ideology than identity. Ethnicity mattered less than dogma, i.e. a Lithuanian communist had more power than a Russian reactionary. But as communism was so repressive, it failed to capture the imagination of the world. Who wanted to emigrate to communist nations?) So, this kind of imperialism seems truly 'enlightened' and fair. Unlike old imperialism, it's not about one people conquering and dominating another but ALL THE PEOPLE coming under liberal hegemony. And within this New World Order, whites are just as likely(if not more so) to come under criticism on grounds of 'racism' and etc.

Of course, it's far more complicated than that. Empire of Enlightenment is really a ruse, an illusion. After all, if indeed it's true that ALL peoples should come under criticism and scrutiny, why is there so little talk of Jewish Power, the most powerful power in the West and thus in the world? Why are Jews praised and 'protected' all over the world, from Russia to the US? Why does even Iran go about making a case that "We take good care of our Jews?" How come BLM and Antifa activists hardly go after Jews, and when they do, they get crushed like a bug? Empire of Enlightenment or EOE is really a Jewish Supremacist World Order that creates the impression of New Western Values of 'Diversity' and 'Inclusion' by making it seem like the West is still marked by White Supremacism. Thus, all good peoples — Jews, Muslims, blacks, yellows, browns, Hindus, 'good white liberals', tolerable white cuckservatives, homos, trannies, feminists, and etc. — must all join forces to fight this evil scourge. This creates the impression that all is fair in the New World Order. (Besides, Jews push Diversity on grounds of "Is it good for Jews?" More goy diversity means Jews can play divide-and-rule among bickering goyim.) Gee, the West may invade and bomb other nations, but it is NOT in the service of White Supremacism but 'spreading democracy' and 'fighting terror'. How can it be about supremacism when the West is most committed to stamping out 'white racism' and even 'white privilege'? If anything, the West invites tons of non-white migrants to Europe and immigrants to the US to join forces with 'good whites' to combat White Supremacism. The children of immigrants are taught by good whites to hate 'white racism' as the greatest evil. But, this is to totally overlook the fact that Jewish Supremacism than white supremacism rules the West. It overlooks the fact that Jewish Supremacists are using white mercenary soldiers to destroy other nations, mostly Muslim, and not for 'spreading democracy' or 'fighting terror' but for the interests of Zion and Jewish Power. And it is blind to the fact that Jews invoke 'white supremacism' to deflect attention from Jewish Supremacism as the true master of the West. Even BLM is a ploy on the part of Jews to keep blacks hating whites and to keep whites being paralyzed with 'white guilt'. And what is globo-homo-mania but a Jewish agenda to replace Christianity and natural normality with Queertianity and minority-elite privilege?

In all this, blacks may be the greatest beneficiaries, indeed even more so than Jews. After all, whereas Jews must work very hard to maintain the current World Order, blacks need only sit back and bask in all the love from all the world. Some worthless Negro, Fentanyl Floyd, dies of drug overdose, and all the world loves blacks. Democrats cheer on black rage, GOP doesn't object. Donald Trump says Fentanyl Floyd is an angel looking down on us. European nations broke out in BLM protests. (Some of this was naive and sincere in the spirit of Negrolatry. But it was cynical in some cases as knee-jerk Anti-Americanism. What easier way to justify Anti-Americanism than by mentioning the Black Problem, especially as the universally accepted narrative says black problems are mostly the result of 'legacy of white racism'?) So, blacks can just sit on their ass while both pro-American and anti-American forces around the world chant BLM. After all, BLM is both a form of US imperialism and a form of anti-US imperialism. It is promoted even by US embassies. BLM has officially been declared as the new anthem of America. Americans should take pride in it as the Second Civil Rights. The fact that so many Americans care about Black Lives and condemn 'white supremacist' police brutality means US is a progressive and conscientious nation. So, kudos to America!! (It is also a good way to unseat the white supremacist literally hitler Trump who isn't a real US president but Putin's Puppet or Siberian Candidate.) But BLM is also useful for the 'enemies' of the US. Iran and China are having a field day, watching American cities fall to SJW insurrections that paint the US as an evil nation. The shaming of America taints its image around the world.

In either case, it becomes a game of Tug-A-Gro(Tug-A-Negro). US and its allies tug on the Negro as their darling race, and anti-American nations tug on the Negro to show their love for blacks who are oppressed by US and the West. So, blacks get everything from all sides from this. They not only get adulation in the West but from the Anti-West. The West says, "We are so sorry for the legacy of racism, and we are doing everything and much more to make things so much better for Blacks or BLACKS", and the Anti-West says, "Oh boo hoo, we weep for those wonderful magical innocent Negroes being mistreated by Evil White Racists in the US and West." So, blacks can just sit pretty(or ugly) and receive alms and accolades from all sides. The typical US-China insult-fest goes like this: "Look how those evil Chinese are so 'racist' and treating black Africans like animals whereas we good Americans care so very much about blacks" vs "Look how 'racist' America is oppressing those noble innocent blacks whereas we Chinese are committed to justice and invest so much in Africa to help out the poor blacks." Pure Tug-A-Gro. With Negroes gaining so much from conflicts among non-blacks, they may inherit the world as they are now above criticism from all sides. It's like J. Wellington Wimpy gets all the food while Popeye and Bluto fight one another. It's like Negrollar is the Moral Currency of the World. Because blacks were slaves in the US(the most powerful nation on Earth), black nations/communities are the poorest & most pitiable, blacks tend to be shamelessly vocal(thereby gaining the most attention), and blacks have cool-cred as athletes and rappers(and dong-butt folks), they are both objects of sympathy and fascination.