How JUSTICE really functions in the IDOLATRY POLITICS of the Jewish-Supremacist West — The Immorality of Moral Immortality — US is a Theocracy of 'Idolocracy', a mindless worship of Jews, Blacks, and Homos

Justice, especially political justice, is a matter of who/whom: Who has the power and which groups have 'sacral' worth? This is also true of individuals — notice how certain Jews tend to get pardoned more than people of other groups, and consider how the Law pretty much allows black thugs and shoplifters/looters to walk free — but especially true at the political level. In Central America during the Cold War, the white-led right-wing regimes could employ 'death squads' and mow down countless indigenous brown folks suspected of being sympathetic to Marxist guerrillas. That was 'justice' in those parts, with the acquiescence of US power. In communist nations, the secret police could arbitrarily arrest anyone and charge him of treason, espionage, or 'bourgeois' thought crimes. The accused could be sent to prison camps or shot dead in basements. That was 'justice' under communism. So, justice is usually the tool of the power. It is what the Power wants and says it is.

Under liberal systems, there developed the idea that justice should be impartial, fair-minded, based on strict adherence to laws(applicable to all), and protective of the 'universal rights' of all citizens, rich or poor, regardless of color or creed. Though liberal systems were far from perfect in the practice of administering justice, it could be said that, more or less, the West was moving toward greater impartiality and fairness up to the 1960s. This mode of justice was based on individual rights. But the Civil Rights Movement wasn't just about the right of blacks as individuals but as a group, and that agenda, along with other trends, provided the groundwork for a different kind of justice. If traditional rightist justice favored the upper classes and certain races over others and if the radical leftist justice favored the notion of 'social justice' that trampled on individual rights in favor of the supposed good of the collective, the classic liberal notion of justice emphasized the rights of individuals. But the New Liberal theory tended to be both more collective-utilitarian(though not to the extent of communism) and special-interest-oriented in the name of reversing past injustice. Collective-utilitarian notion of justice was at the heart of the New Deal. And special-interest notion of justice animated the Great Society program of LBJ and the rise of Holocaust Cult. By emphasizing the problems of black history, the idea was that blacks as a group deserved special recognition. And because Jews suffered the Holocaust, supposedly the greatest evil act in all of history, they were deserving of special sympathy and consideration. (Initially, pro-black & pro-Jewish attitudes and policies were based on sympathy, but the rising cult of their Noble Suffering and their spectacular success in 'idolic' fields of brains & brawn led to idolatrous worship of them as the Truly Superior Races.)

This came to function as a template for other groups as well. Noticing how blacks and Jews gained so much by pushing for justice on grounds of special interest than individual rights, many groups in the US began to develop their own form of Identity Politics. Identity Politics was different from national chauvinism of old that was premised on the conviction of one's own people being somehow superior and/or more powerful than others. In contrast, Identity Politics was based on the cult of victim-hood. Your people could be said to be more special if they suffered more than others. As Identity Politics emerged when the white West pretty much dominated all the world — even the Soviet Union was mostly white, something Red China exploited in its appeal to the non-white world during the Sino-Soviet Rift — , the general impression was of White Dominance and Non-White Victim-hood. Still, as the scales of victim-hood were still determined by the Power, it all came down to who/whom/when/where as emphasized by the Narrative, the product of media & academia.
Victim-hood mattered more if the villains were white and if the victims were non-white or Jewish. And it mattered MORE if the oppression happened IN the West, especially the US or Northern Europe. And it was mostly about the 19th and 20th century. As blacks were oppressed in America by whites, they had a good claim. As Jews suffered in Europe in World War II, they too had an easy claim. But much less sympathy goes to non-white victims of whites in non-white lands. More blacks and Hindus were mowed down by whites in Africa and India, but there is far more outrage about far fewer number of blacks who were killed by whites in the US. As for all the violence among non-whites, they don't matter. Who cares about what's been happening in Kashmir? Even as anti-whites claim to call for 'de-colonization of the mind', they are hopelessly 'West-centric' in emphasizing what happened/happens in the West uber alles. (Furthermore, these 'de-colonizers' are desperate to depart from their own native lands to go live in the West. It's as if they still consider the West to be the only Metropole that matters. And of course, even most anti-Western rhetoric has been cooked up by self-hating Westerners whose minds were colonized by Jewish Power and fueled by post-Christian need for absolution by some other means. So, anti-white politics is essentially about non-whites adopting the politics of white self-loathing, and as such, non-whites are still under white mind-control, albeit that of self-loathing whites. And the fact that many of these non-whites prize Jews, blacks, and/or homos over their own kind suggests that they're still totally 'colonized' by Western Powers that now happens to controlled by Jews.) A truly de-colonized mind would stop seeing the West as the source of all good and evil — the paradise to emigrate to and the hell to denounce — , but such is the state of your average non-white & anti-white mind.

Because of the Rules of Identity Politics, various non-whites groups must demonstrate their worthiness of sympathy by emphasizing their victim-hood at the hands of whites in the West, especially in the 20th century(and maybe 19th century). But as many of these groups are relatively recent immigrants, their experience of oppression under whites happened mostly in non-Western lands, and that means their suffering counts for less than that of Jews and blacks. (Even as globalism attacks the notion of national territorial rights, the tragic worth of any history is largely determined by WHERE it happened, i.e. if the police kills a black man on US soil, that is an outrage, but if the US military kills scores of innocent civilians abroad, it doesn't matter. The logic of Tragic Dirt.) Shoah happened in Europe, and black slavery happened in the US, and as such, they matter more. (Oddly enough though, their cults of suffering are transferable to all others of their kind. So, even though American and Anglo Jews were safe during WWII, indeed infinitely more so than white goyim in Europe who died in greater numbers than the Jews did, they too can invoke 'muh holocaust' as fellow Jews. Likewise, recently arrived black African immigrants in US and Europe can also invoke BLM nonsense and 'muh slavery' even though their ancestors captured and sold black slaves to Arabs & whites and even though black-on-black oppression & violence in black nations are far beyond anything whites have done to blacks in recent years. Also, the fact that American Indian experience doesn't count for much in the Narrative shows that the rules of Identity Politics are not set in stone. If a certain group tends not to be vocal and exhibits no special talent in the 'idolic' fields, it is mostly ignored regardless of its tragic history at the hands of whites. Today, American Indians, the people with the biggest claim to victim-hood in American History, get less attention than Asian-Indians who are always talking and balking.) Identity Politics is based on victim-hood points, but over time, it has fused with the All-American culture of winner-takes-all. Jews and blacks began their Identity Politics by wailing abut their victim-hood but, in good ole American fashion, gained special consideration because of their success with money, humor, arts & culture, athletics, & entertainment. So, over time, Identity Politics became more like Idolatry Politics. In other words, 'muh victim-hood' wasn't good enough. What really mattered was 'muh victor-hood to accentuate muh victim-hood'. In other words, if a group could demonstrate superiority in some key field, its victim-hood was to be considered MORE TRAGIC on account of injustice having been done to something better. It's like it's deemed worse to kill a gorilla than a baboon or to kill a giraffe than a gazelle.

So, what we now call Identity Politics is essentially Idolatry Politics. We don't have mass parades in favor of Palestinians where everyone shows up and waves the BDS flag. But we do have 'Pride' Parades where peoples of all colors sing homosannas to fruits and trannies draped in 'rainbow' colors. Of course, Jews want it this way because an Identity Politics where all groups have equal worth — or where all non-white groups have equal worth — would be threatening to their Zionist-globalist supremacist agenda. Indeed, what would happen to Jewish Power if Americans were to give equal hearing to Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians as to Israelis and their Jewish-American enablers? Also, so many groups around the world have had unpleasant experience with Jews, be they blacks in South Africa or the peoples of Latin America. And European History wasn't only of Antisemitism but Jewish chicaneries, some of which came to do great harm. This is why Jews are wary of all-out Identity Politics. It's like Ben Shapiro denounces it because it means groups such as Palestinian-Americans can have their day in the sun as a victim group as well.

As far as Jews are concerned, the only kind of Identity Politics that is acceptable is an Idolatrous one where Jews get to decide the who/whom. So, Jewish Identity and Jewish Suffering are special and must serve as the basis of goyim making amends to Jews by doing whatever Jews demand. And Jews have especially chosen homos and blacks as fellow Idolatrous Groups, not only because both are highly profitable to Jewish industries in fashion & entertainment but because blacks can be used to bait 'white guilt' and homo-celebration can be used to replace Christianity with Queertianity. (Deep in their hearts, Jews still regard Jesus and Paul as renegade Jews, and there is no 'hate symbol' more 'triggering' to Jews than the Christian Crucifix. Of course, as the West was overwhelmingly Christian for over a millennia, Jews couldn't say that outright, but their big dream was always to destroy Christianity and banish the Crucifix. They tried this by destroying churches in the USSR, but it didn't work, and so they are now working to spiritually corrupt Christianity with Anno Sodomini and worship of Magic Negro or Fentanyl Floyd.)

There can be no true justice or impartial justice with idolatry, which is a cheap form of theology. Idolatry may not be deep, but like religion, it is about blind or mindless worship/faith. As such, US justice system is essentially theocratic or 'idolocratic'. Just like religious folks cannot question, blame, or condemn God or gods(no matter what), the idolocratic US cannot condemn sacred Jews and holy blacks(and homos) no matter what they do. The ONLY time Jews, blacks, and homos come under fire is when they insult or attack one another. So, Donald Sterling the Jewish oligarch had to be denounced because he said unkind things about blacks. So, Nick Cannon has to be bitch-slapped back into 'sense' for having said nasty stuff about Jews — never mind what he said about whites. It's perfectly okay for Jews to insult, defame, and smear whites. It's okay for blacks to denounce whites as the devil. No matter how much abuse is heaped on them, whites must keep their mouths shut, do nothing as their symbols & monuments are vandalized by mobs or removed by the establishment, take the knee, and cuck out. Or, whites can go into brainwashed Janissary mode like Antifa goons or the likes of John Bolton & Dan Crenshaw and join with Jews against the Culture War on whites and nationalism. How can true justice operate in such a world?

The fate of Arabs and Muslims in the current order is a sure sign that Idolatry Politics has rendered Justice into a tool of special groups, namely Jews, blacks, and homos. BLM means black lives are precious, white lives are not. And, it's always who/whom. When blacks kill blacks, never mind. As blacks are special, they may kill other blacks, just like gods may fight gods. But how dare these inferior low-life white mortals dare to kill a black god like Fentanyl Floyd or Gentle Giant Michael Brown? Blacks have been robbing, raping, assaulting, and murdering whites in alarming numbers since the 1960s, but who cares? The god-race may attack the mortal-race. Gods are deemed immortal, and blackness has been immortalized in the sense that the black tragedy of American Slavery has been essentialized to apply to all black folks and all of black history. (Also, electronic recording means that all future generations of whites get to worship Otis Redding and Bob Marley as immortal gods of pop culture.) After all, the so-called 1619 project applies even to black African immigrants, the descendants of blacks who captured and sold slaves. So, all of blackness from time immemorial to all the future is to be defined by tragic suffering at the hands of whites. So, never mind Bantu genocides against other Africans. Never mind Zulu atrocities. Never mind the likes of Idi Amin and all those nasty black thugs in the US and elsewhere. All of blackness through the eons is now about 'muh slavery' and ennoblement by suffering under white 'racism'. 100,000 yrs of blackness is to center around 200 yrs of slavery in America. And Jews have done the same with 'muh Holocaust'. All of Jewish Identity and History are to be associated with that tragedy. It's as if all of Jewish-Gentile history led up to that point and all of Jewish-Gentile future must revolve around that memory that condemns whites while consecrating Jews. So, it doesn't matter if Jewish history is full of bad Jewish behavior and if Jews do terrible things now or in the future. Jewish Identity has achieved Moral Immortality via the Holocaust Cult. Of course, in practice, Moral Immortality can only be a monstrous immorality as it's downright demented for any human group to act like they're eternally hallowed and sacred, thus above the rules that apply to other groups.

What does Moral Immortality for blacks and Jews mean in practice? Consider the fate of Muslims and Arabs. There was the photograph of the Muslim man whose business was destroyed in the aftermath of the Ferguson riots. He'd done no wrong. He was strong-armed and robbed by Michael Brown, and later big bully Brown attacked a police officer and got killed in the altercation. But the ONLY narrative that mattered was 'black lives matter' or Negrolatry. The livelihoods or the lives of Muslim businessmen didn't matter at all. The Jewish Media pushed Idolatry Politics of blacks uber Muslims. And one wonders how many Muslim businesses were destroyed this time around following the death of Fentanyl Floyd? To the New American Mind, only Jews, blacks, and homos have starring roles as the good guys while whites have the starring roles as villains. All other groups have supporting roles(at best) or exist only as blurry extras in the background. In movies, we don't care how many people get killed as long as the main characters survive. In INDEPENDENCE DAY, who cares if the entire city blows up as long as the key characters are alive and well and get all the glory?
I'm assuming many more Muslims had their lives ruined as the result of riots following the death of Fentanyl Floyd, but no one cares. So, blacks have a righteous right to riot, burn, loot, and attack people. Their lives(and lusts) matter, but others don't matter. This proves the utter hollowness of all this 'liberal' yammering about Diversity and Equality. Not only are immigrant groups being slated to pay the bulk of 'reparations' to blacks but all these 'nice white liberals' show no sympathy for people such as Muslims who were attacked by black violence.

But it is even worse with Jewish Power and its use of Mass Murder Inc, aka the US military. When Neocons smeared the 'Arabists', what were they really attacking? An American policy of blindly favoring Arabs over Jews? No, so-called 'Arabists' were calling for a more fair and balanced approach to the Middle East by considering Arab/Muslim interests as well as those of Zionists. If anything, your average 'Arabist' was nevertheless more pro-Zionist than pro-Arab. Still, he wasn't 100% pro-Zionist and willing to lend an ear to the other side, especially in service to American Interests. But, that wasn't good enough for Jews, for whom it had to be 100% pro-Jewish and the hell with Arab/Muslim interests. In other words, US foreign policy must be totally JEWIST, but of course, all the cuck-shills of Zion aren't called that. Idolatry Politics means Jews are special, wonderful, and oh-so-admirable in every way. Jews being so great, how can anyone oppose any Jewish demand?
So, whatever the problem or consequence, the US must always favor Jews EVEN IF these policies lead to wanton destruction of countless Arab/Muslim lives. Jewish Lives Matter, Arab Lives Don't. Jews can wipe out Palestine off the map, but never mind, and Long Live Israel. Instead, focus on paranoid fantasies of how Iran is going to 'wipe Israel off the map'. Israel ignores international standards and has 300 nukes with stolen technology and material from the US while Iran has no nukes and has caved to every international demand. But never mind. Shower Israel with billions in aid while starving Iran and subverting its economy, making millions suffer. And if Jews cheer on Saudi Arabia's genocidal war on Yemen on grounds that it's good for Jews and bad for Iran, that's great too. And even though Mossad is carrying out terrorist attacks in Iran(and aiding the most demented terrorists in Syria), ignore all that and just accuse Iran of being the #1 terrorist nation, as worthless Donald Trump does all the time as the pathetic dog of Zion.
So-called 'liberals' are so into idolatry(of Jews, blacks, and homos) that they are incapable of fair-mindedness. And for all their bleating about injustice, they are such craven cowards who dare not offend Jews lest they lose their precious jobs in elite institutions and industries. As for 'conservatives', their hierarchical mindset means they will kneel before whomever has the most power and privilege. Whether it's Sean Hannity praising Amazon or Rich Lowry cucking before his Jewish donors, 'conservatives' are following in the grand tradition of sucking up to the royal court. As for some others on the right, cheering for White Jews over Brown Arabs is a subliminal way of White Pride. It's ironic of course. Jews prohibit white identity and white agency, but Jews wink-wink urge white rightists to cheer for white Jews and Israel(as outpost of Western Civilization) against those Sand Ni**ers. If you can't have Apartheid and Jim Crow anymore, you can at least cheer for Jim Crowitz and IDF death squads mowing down those brown women and children. The likes of David French will virtue-signal by denouncing Old America but cheer on Israelis defending the border and shooting women and children in Gaza. A truly surreal case of whites, having had their own 'racism' canceled by Jews, must outsource their 'racist' fantasies to 'white' Jews who, being Moral Immortals, have the license to mow down brown people in the old ways of colonialist-imperialist wars.

Moral Immortality means Jews and blacks get to loot the world. Jews, being smart, used financial trickery to rape the Russian economy. Jewish banksters in Wall Street got massive bailouts and grew even richer during the Great Recession at the expense of Main Street. Ever more billions are poured into the coffers of Israel while coffins multiply in the Muslim World. The likes of Paul Singer and George Soros can loot entire nations.
Blacks, being stupid and childish, loot in the savage-barbarian way of smashing windows and running off with the goods. And beating up or shooting anyone in their way. Outwardly, blacks seem to do far more damage, but the amount they steal is a pittance compared to cargoes of Jewish Booty. At most, blacks will destroy a part of town. Jewish oligarchs and sharks loot entire economies. Not for nothing was George Soros called 'the man who broke the Bank of England'. But just like most black looters get to walk away scot-free with their loot, Jewish globalist sharks are allowed to keep their ill-gotten loot and look to steal more and more.

But, Jewish Power isn't only about white collar crime. By controlling cuck-politicians of the US, Jewish Power gets to employ Mass Murder Inc, aka US military, to wage Wars for Israel, thus destroying entire nations with invasions, bombings, drone attacks, and blockades. The death tolls abroad from such ventures are far beyond the murder and mayhem committed by blacks. But what do Jews and blacks care? Even when they are caught doing bad stuff, they usually get a slap on the wrist or get pardoned. Most black looters will walk free, and so many bad Jews are never investigated, and even those who get convicted serve in minimum-security prisons or get pardoned. Such is justice in Idolocratic America. Justice follows the theocratic mode of worshipful attitudes toward certain groups who can almost never do wrong even when they do wrong, whereas certain other groups, especially whites, Palestinians, Russians, and Iranians, are always deemed wrong even when they do right. But what would be right-and-wrong in a world of 'gay marriage' and 'trannies are women' logic that has inverted all sense of reality?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UZaI1ZqikkNH/

To Understand the Current Madness with BLM & Antifa, One Must Address JEWISH SUPREMACIST POWER — Whites have Manpower and Materials but lack Mettle and Morale — How Jewish Supremacism Exploits Noble Negro Cult for Its Own Vile Interests

Name the Jewish Power, and things come into focus.

Why all this use of blackness to blame and shame whites? Who controls the media? It ain't Eskimos. Sure, there have always been white do-gooders and white atoners, but they were in balance with white patriots and noble race-ists. Who tipped the balance toward white self-hatred? Jews did. (This is what Paul Gottfried doesn't much talk about it. He's right about the long history of white do-gooders, but he fails to address the factor of Jewish Power in tipping the scales to white self-denial.)

Now, why are Jews today especially desperate to bash whitey? Reasons are pretty obvious.

1. Jews have bad press around the world despite their control of global media. Many peoples associate Jewish Power with War Street, Neocon Wars, and Zionist oppression of Palestinians. Jews must spend lots and lots of money to buy support, but support based on money isn't very strong. Once the money dries up, the support vanishes. Jews invoke Holocaust, but it only really works in Europe. Rest of the world had NOTHING to do with it, and the notion that Palestinians deserved to lose their homeland because of what Germans did is surely absurd to the world community.
Jewishness once had great moral mileage after WWII, and it still does in the West but not so much in the Rest. Also, as Jews have gotten richer and richer while many blacks remained mired in poverty, black resentment of Jews have grown. Also, blacks feel neglected of late due to all the attention showered on globo-homo-mania, another Jewish Agenda. Jews have used globo-homo-mania effectively to gain sway over the world, but holy homo victim-hood isn't really that potent. For one thing, the most prominent fruits are whites, and many around the world associate globo-homo with 'white privilege' and Western cultural imperialism. Because Jewishness is increasingly associated with super wealth, uber-privilege, and Zionist crimes and because there is a limit to moral capital to globo-homo, Jews push Noble Negro stuff. There's 'guilt by association' but also 'sanctity by association'. As black Africa has been poor and colonized by the West and as there was indeed a compelling history of racial oppression in the US -- and because Africa and much of Black America are still stuck in poverty -- , one can easily create the impression that innocent and noble blacks have been WRONGED by whitey. Just like 'the butler did it', there is 'whitey done it'.

Jews are effectively trying to kill two birds with one stone with Noble Negro shtick. By closely associating themselves with blacks, Jews seek moral shield. Jews need it due to all the crimes they've committed in the Middle East and all the hatred they are stirring up against Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, Syria, and etc. So, if people say, "Jews oppress Palestinians", Jews say, "We Jews are the best friends of Noble Negroes. How could a people who feel such compassion for Noble Negroes have a wicked heart, boo hoo hoo?" This shtick is so obvious in scum like Jerry Nadler. An ardent Zionist who doesn't care about the countless dead due to Wars for Israel and Zionist terror but bleating with crocodile tears about black 'victims'. It's all a moral bait-and-switch. But, Jews have pulled the same shi* with globo-homo. They first spread homo-mania in the West as the new mass cult, the new sensation, the new quasi-new-age-spirituality. And then, they said Israel has the biggest 'pride' parades whereas those 'less evolved' Muslims and Arabs persecute homos. Also, as the US military became a vessel of globo-homo, its wars became palatable to many progs. Jews gained a lot of moral mileage for Israel by associating it as the 'gay place to be'. Now, there was a time when most whites associated homosexuality and tranny-stuff with deviancy, decadence, degeneracy, and even disease. But as whites have lost culture, community, tradition, and roots, their main culture is pop culture, and they get their 'values' from sitcoms. And of course, education has gone from cultivating critical free-thinking minds to conforming to PC. So-called 'Critical Theory' is anything but. It's about teaching kids to be 'critical' of anything Jews don't like while ignoring anything that undermines the Agenda.

Because ever-increasing Jewish Power & Wealth leads more and more people associating Jews with oppression than with victim-hood, Jews are seeking 'sanctity(or innocence) by association'. Jews are especially going all out on this with blacks because they know that many blacks don't like nor trust Jews. Many blacks see Jews are super-rich whites. Blacks certainly feel NO guilt about the Holocaust and, on some level, may agree with certain Naziesque sentiments about Jews that are voiced by Nation of Islam. Also, despite the Memory Hole about South Africa, surely many blacks do recall Israel was the #1 ally of Apartheid South Africa during the Cold War. And Jews and blacks are opposites in that Jewish Power is about mind whereas black power is about body. What they have in common is a certain vulgarity, egotism, and shamelessness, but given Jewish money is about finance whereas black money is about robbery, Jews get more shekels while blacks get more shackles. Indeed, it was Jews who pushed Stop and Frisk in New York to bring down black crime. Indeed, since the end of the Cold War, Jews(and homos) led the way in gentrifying cities, and that meant getting tougher on black crime. Black resentment simmered over this even as blacks themselves benefited from less killings and muggings in their neighborhood. Blacks often react with pride than understanding of facts and sense. During Obama years, black rage was kept in check because many blacks just assumed they were in charge because the president was black. Just like Billy Boy Clinton, the 'first black president', could get away with tougher crime laws because blacks perceived him as 'whitey who likes black folks', Obama could get away with expending most of his energies on serving Jews, expanding gentrification, and prioritizing globo-homo because he's a black guy. And even Bush II was a 'compassionate conservative' who said he cried the most tears when Kanye West said Bush don't like black folks. But after all these years, black problems still fester. (Now, we know why. It's genetics, but such truth is too triggering in our times.) And so, blacks are up in arms again. Of course, Jews sort of inflamed this rage to use against Trump, but they surely didn't know things would get this crazy, just like Mao was taken aback by the extent of Red Guard fury and destruction. Play with fire, and it get burn out of control.

Anyway, because rich & privileged Jews are losing moral credit as a 'victim group' around the world(and even in some proggy communities that support BDS) and especially because Jews played a prominent role in gentrification, favoring globo-homo, and locking up lots of blacks, they are now trying to memory-hole those facts and make themselves out to be the #1 sympathizers of Noble Negroes. So, this is more a Jewish thing than black thing. After all, Jews, not Negroes, control the media.

2. The second reason why Jews push Noble Negro cult is to ensure 'white guilt'. Jews know that white identity-independence-pride will lead to (1) whites serving their own interests and (2) whites being fair to all groups than favoring Jews over others. If whites were truly free in mind, spirit, and body, their priority would of course be, "Is it good for whites?" Also, when dealing with non-whites, whites would be free-thinkers and try to be fair-minded and hear all sides. Whites would listen to Jews and to Palestinians. Why would whites want that? Jews want whites to feel guilty and ashamed of their identity and then steer that guilt into serving Holy Jews and Noble Negroes. "Sorry for Holocaust and Slavery, must suck up to Holy Jews and Noble Negroes." Jews claim to fear 'white supremacism', and in the past, this had some validity because a variant of white supremacism, Nazism, had a devastating impact on Jews, though, to be sure, it killed many more whites, especially in Slavic nations. (Of course, Jews also benefited great from white supremacism, especially of the Anglo and Hispanic kind. Jewish bankers invested in Western Imperialism, Jewish merchants plied their trade in expanding empires, and Jews surely gained tremendously from Anglo-and-Hispanic destruction of native cultures in the New World. And Jewish diamond merchants in South Africa are there ONLY BECAUSE of white imperialism. So, Jews mostly had no problem with 'white supremacism' as long as it wasn't anti-Jewish to boot.) If in the past, Jews were fearful of anti-Jewish form of white supremacism, today, it's not about white supremacism at all. Jews now characterize any white identity or interest as 'white supremacist' to keep whites browbeaten so that they will serve Jewish SUPREMACISM that really rules the West. We have a surreal situation of Jews decrying white non-supremacism as 'supremacism' to perpetuate their own supremacism while posing as eternal holy holocaust victims.
Jews yammer about justice, fairness, and equality — ROTFL — , but Jews don't want whites to be fair-minded. Fair-minded whites will, after all, question the Wars for Israel and address the problems faced by Palestinians. Take the term 'Arabists', a truly dirty term oft-used by Neocons to smear fair-minded whites. The so-called 'Arabists' did not FAVOR the Arabs. They were not owned by the Arabs. And they certainly were not Arabs. So, why were they called 'Arabists'? Because they wanted the US to (1) prioritize US interests over Jewish-Zionist interests and (2) they wanted the US to be fair-minded BOTH sides in the Israeli-Arab conflicts. They were not for favoring Arabs over Jews but for objectivity and balance in US foreign policy. But simply because they weren't 100% subservient to Israeli interests and Jewish demands, they were called 'Arabists', as if they had a special thing for Arabian Nights or kebabs. So, the mere notion that Arabs should be given a fair hearing is to be 'Arabist', just like the notion that whites have an identity and interests of their own is 'white supremacist'. Jews are like the pimp who see whites as the whore. The whore has to remain totally loyal to the pimp while the pimp can do as he pleases and play around with other whores. What a ghastly people, and yet, whites ceded total power and moral authority to them. Is it any wonder that white demise is happening all around?

-------------------

The current madness teaches us something about the nature of power. It is one of those trite lessons that need repeating because people so easily forget. Power isn't only about manpower and material but mettle and morale. In manpower and materials, white people have the means to vanquish just about any people and anything in the world. If white people in the US, UK, and Canada felt 'enough is enough' and restore order by kicking Negro butt, it could be done. There are lots of white people and lots of white means. Whites have lots of guns. There are many white police officers. Most politicians are white. Majority populations are still white. But what is striking in current events is not so much that savage blacks and rabid white progs are attacking status, monuments, and symbols but the totally impotent lack of will, confidence, pride, and courage among whites to do anything about it. There are violent mobs and silent whites. Why the silence? It's as if they're too afraid, demoralized, guilty, and browbeaten to express their anger. Thus, the notion of the 'silent majority' during the Nixon years was problematic. While Richard Nixon was speaking for the Silent Majority, he didn't raise the core question as to why they remain silent and only express their views anonymous through the ballot box. If you silently vote for preserving the monuments while never voicing why they should be defended publicly, the younger generation won't learn anything.

In the distant future, when historians study the fall of the West, they may well wonder the WHY? Why did whites lose when, based on all statistics available, they had so many advantages in manpower, materials, and means in the first half of the 21st century. Why didn't they push back against negative trends when they had the material means and the number of people to do so?
It's like asking,"Why did the French lose so quickly against Germany in 1940 when they had the manpower and materials to last longer?" Or, "Why did the KMT lose in the Chinese Civil War when, following the end of WWII, they held more territory, had more men, and had more materials." It's like asking, "Why did South Vietnam lose to North Vietnam when it had more people and received massive amounts of money and weapons from the US?" They had men and materials but they lacked morale. And there is no White Morale anymore. The new morality pushed by Jews has destroyed white identity and white pride. Via education, media, and entertainment, whites have been made favor globo-homo over true morality, celebrate blackness as cool or revere it as tragic(and all because of 'white racism'), worships Jews as eternal holocaust-people, and hate their own identity as the source of all evil, or 90% of it. (After all, Jews need to blame Iranians and Muslims to in order to make whites fight Wars for Israel.) So, even though whites still have the manpower and materials to save their race, their nations, and their heritage many times over, they dare not do anything. White Power has something akin to penile dysfunction syndrome. It may be big but cannot get hard. And a limp penis, no matter how big or fat, is useless. It is morale that hardens a people with will, courage, determination, and righteousness. It is what makes a people willing to kill, willing to die. North Vietnamese and Viet Cong had morale; South Vietnamese soldiers, as virtual mercenaries of US empire, did not. North Vietnamese respected their leaders and believed in the rightness and righteousness of their cause. South Vietnamese, even as most of them didn't want communism, saw their leaders as feckless whore-puppets of the US. They may not have wanted communism but they weren't willing to fight and die for the existing system. Likewise, white people may not want the future of Jewish supremacism, black thuggery, and fruit-tyranny, but they don't believe in their identity, culture, and traditions sufficiently to fight for them, to kill and die for them. But then, this could be said for browns of Latin America as well. Browns in some of those nations have the manpower to take power from whites but they lack unity, solidarity, and confidence. They lack meaningful identity and just carry on as the perpetually colonized.

How many civilizations in the past fell not because of lack of manpower and materials but lack of mettle and morale? White Multiple Sclerosis has spread all through the West... and even across non-white vassal states of the US.

The brilliance of the Jewish Trick is that Jews associated white cuckery with white status. Ideally, white elites must lead the white masses. But elites are inherently vain and narcissistic. They not only want material privilege but moral pride. And it just so happens that education and entertainment taught white elites that their high status depends on white cuckery, white self-debasement, and white guilt as expressions of virtue-signaling. If white debasement only came with pain and humiliation, there's a greater likelihood that whites will rebel. But a select group of white collaborator elites are showered with praise and goodies for their cuckery. Take Tom Brokaw, that worthless pile of scum shi*. He's cucked and cucked and cucked and been heaped with praise by the Establishment and lives with his many millions.

Anyway, so-called white patriots who refuse to mention Jewish Supremacist Power as the cancer of all this are pretty useless. They are like doctors who notice every symptom but refuse to mention the 'c' word.

Best chemo against supremacist shlomo, or best shlomo-chemo? If Jews use blacks and diversity against whites, whites must do so in kind. Begin with PALESTINIAN LIVES MATTER. No, it's not 'Arabist' but fair justice for all sides.

\

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PkDUvXt2HXoO/