Anglo-American Way vs the Jewish-American Way — Jewish-American Way over the American Way — The Shame of German-America and the Need to Revive Germanism

Jews have made sure that Jews don’t fight other Jews, neither in the West nor around the world. American History is one of betrayal from the beginning. Anglo-Colonists sided with the French and fought against the Mother Country and the loyal Anglo-Colonials. German-Americans were pressured to turn on Germany and fight and kill other Germans. Same with Italian-Americans. Japanese-Americans, though interned and dispossessed, volunteered to fight for America, even against Japan that had been baited by FDR's administration into attacking the US navy. Muslim-Americans join the US military and drop bombs on other Muslims. Russian-Americans must kill Russians if the Jewish-controlled US declares war on Russia. Chinese-Americans must fight and kill Chinese if the Jewish-controlled US declares war on China. And so on. Whatever patriotism Russians feel for Russia in Russia, it evaporates almost immediately upon coming to America. Chinese may be patriotic in China but toss away Chinese Pride upon landing in US or Canada. They become insta-potential-traitors with loyalties switched to the new country.

Given America’s history of betrayal at the founding and the betrayals of immigrant groups against their countries of origin, Jews knew they could fall into the same pattern: Jewish-Americans being encouraged, cajoled, nudged, or badgered into working against Jews in other countries, or World Jewry. This is why Jews reacted so violently to the Red Scare. Though Joe McCarthy and HUAC didn’t turn their anti-communist campaign into a Jewish Issue, many who came under suspicion were Jews. The pressure on Jewish Americans to take a strong stand against International Communism could also turn against World Jewry, not least because Jews were vastly over-represented in radical movements worldwide, even with capitalist Jews working with socialist Jews at times for common tribal interests, e.g. over the Palestine Question. So, Jews took up the banner of civil liberties, which they didn’t really care about — look how Jews got the power now and do everything to suppress civil liberties and constitutional rights — , to go on the counter-attack against anti-communists who came to be smeared by Jewish-controlled media and Liberal Academia as 'paranoid' instigators of unfounded 'witch hunts'.

One thing for sure, given America’s tireless sermonizing about ‘human rights’(which are often invoked as justification for US action), Israel would make an ideal target for US intervention on behalf of Palestinians(whose plight is many times more dire than that of Uighurs in China). Of course, Jews absolutely cannot tolerate such an outcome, one where their adopted country would be at war with Jews in some other part of the world and where All Good Jewish-Americans would be expected to stand with all decent Americans against Evil Israel, just like All Good German-Americans were expected to side with the US against their nation of origin, Deutschland. And so, Jewish-Americans spent tons of money and used their media monopoly, as well as Holocaust moral blackmail, to drum into American minds the mantra “Israel is our greatest ally, Israel is our greatest ally, Israel is our greatest ally…” to the point where it has become one of those truisms that no one even dares to question. They wake up and fall asleep with the mantra “Israel is our greatest ally” reverberating in their minds.

If something like a 'civil war' existed in the Jewish community, half the Jews would call on the US government to be fairer to Palestinians. Now, such Jews do exist but mostly on the bottom of the power totem-pole, not at the top where it really matters. In the commanding heights, both Neocon Jews and Neolib Jews are agreed that goyim must be drilled to repeat, “Israel is our greatest ally” like it's their second nature.
The ‘Jewish Civil War’ scenario is a pipe-dream of people like Donald Trump and ‘conservatives’ who wish to pry away pro-Israel Jews away from anti-Israel Jews, but the truth is even most Democratic Jews, especially at the top, are totally pro-Zionist and make sure most Democrat goyim fall in line on the Middle East issue. Even Barack Obama’s Iran Deal wasn’t about going soft on the Islamic State but an attempt to splinter it apart from Russia and China. Also, it was highly successful in halting the uranium enrichment. Even most Jews who are critical of Israel only focus on the occupation of the West Bank, not the greater crimes Israel has committed against neighboring Arab countries in pursuit of the Yinon Plan. (Zionism has become Yinonism.) By the way, if Trump and the Evangelicals really believe that they, as Christians, care more about the Holy Land than Jews do, shouldn't they go into Crusader mode and claim the Land for Christendom? What's the point of supporting Jewish domination over the Holy Land when Israel has become Sodom and Gomorrah with massive 'gay pride' parades? How can any decent Christian support such desecration of the Holy Land? Given Israel's deviltry with globo-homo, so-called Christian Zionists should really be called christian sodomists because they honor the Tribe that chose to associate holiness with homo bungholes. If Arab Muslims/Christians had kept control over the Holy Land, such perversion would never have been allowed to sprout there.

Jewish hypocrisy is truly outrageous… but in a way, Jews are the most admirable group in the US because they alone among all the groups remained true and loyal to their deep origins. Jewish History is 3,500 yrs old whereas American History is a mere 250 yrs. The idea of prioritizing a new thin citizenship over a deep rich heritage is shallow. The idea of turning one’s back on a tribal community with a 3,500 yr pedigree in favor of a political proposition going back 250 yrs is for the birds or boy scouts. It also means being enticed by ‘money’ and ‘liberty’ to turn one’s back on a deep history and community. Sure, the US offered opportunities to newcomers, and immigrants should try to be good citizens and get along, but should one favor this ‘Americanism’ over one’s deeper identity and culture? Roots going back many centuries, even millennia, discarded in favor of a green card?

More crucially, who determines what Americanism is? Who decides what course of political action is 'patriotic'? Who decides what foreign nations are allies and which ones are enemies and on what basis? It was never the people, most of whom were decent folks minding their own business, who decided. It was always the ruling elites with the power to sway and control the sucker masses for their own often devious ends.
For proof, look at the state of America from the moment it went from Anglo-Christian hands to Jewish hands. Jewish elites got to decide what Americanism is. It’s now about ‘gay marriage’, or so the new elites say, and most American dummies fall in line and nod along. It’s about Wars for Israel, the new elites say, and most Americans don’t object to their shabbos goy politicians shilling for Zion. In 2020, Jews say Americanism is about the blackity-black anti-white 1619 project and about BLM thugs burning down cities while politicians take the knee and the cornered Trump eulogize George Floyd as a black angel. THAT is Americanism because the new elites say so. Jews say Americanism is about targeting parents who oppose CRT as ‘domestic terrorists’. Meanwhile, Israelis can spy on America at every level. It won’t be long before Jonathan Pollard is revised as a great American hero, and US politicians will be apologizing for their country for ever having convicted and locked him up. So, while Americanism at the common level just means American citizens doing their best to be good neighbors, Americanism at the political level is a matter to be decided by the ruling elites. Jews rule America, and their core conviction comes down to "Is it good for Jews?", not "What is good for most Americans, 98% of whom are goyim?" So, while Jews do everything to ensure that Americanism never directs its ire at Israel or World Jewry, they more than gladly turn Americanism into a cudgel against whatever goy country they happen to revile at the moment. Thus, while Jewish-Americans need never worry about being pressured to hate on World Jewry or Israelis, Iranian-Americans must often decide between (Zionist-ruled) US and their homeland of Iran. And Russian-Americans must choose between (Jewish-ruled) US and mother Russia. Because Jews control Americanism to their ends, 'patriotism' will never entail hostility toward Jews in other parts of the world, whereas for Iranian-Americans and Palestinian-Americans, being 'patriotic' Americans means they must stand with pro-Zionist US foreign policy that stomps on the Arab/Muslim World with an iron boot.

Jews among all the immigrant groups figured it out, i.e. the so-called ‘patriotism’ is a ploy used by the ruling elites to hoodwink and control the masses. While most European immigrants came under the spell of the Wasp elites, Jews kept with their deeper identity and loyalty. This is why Jews remained free of Wasp control and, over time, grew in power as a tribe with an identity far deeper and richer than being an 'American'. While Anglo-Americans prided their place in US history for having turned against the 'tyrannical' mother country, Jewish-Americans took pride in the connection between themselves and their brethren in other parts of the world through all of history, past and future, culminating in their insistence that the fates of US and newly established Israel be joined at the hip. No wonder even capitalist Jews at times worked with socialist Jews in Russia and Europe. Beneath the ideology, they valued the identity.

Now, consider the idiot German-Americans contra Jewish-Americans. Prior to World War I, they had their own communities. Many spoke German as well as English. They had German-language newspapers. They were proud of their German culture and identity. But World War I came along, and the Anglo-American elites persecuted the German-American community as disloyal. Anti-German campaigns broke out all across America. German-Americans were often suspected of treason or being ‘un-American’. They got cold feet and went out of their way to demonstrate their 'patriotism' before their vicious Anglo-American persecutors.

But it was neither Germany nor German-Americans that were guilty of treachery. It was the Anglos in UK and US. Germany didn’t want war with UK, which could easily have stayed out, in which case the war would have been over in less than a year with German victory over France and Russia. But Anglo-Brits were paranoid about German power and aided the French. It led to countless and needless deaths. Germany was forced to fight UK. It was the UK that entered a war that wasn’t theirs. That was the real treachery. (And I don’t want to hear about UK siding with fellow democratic France against autocratic Germany. UK and France were allied with far more autocratic Russia.)
But even worse were the Anglo-American elites. If Germany didn’t want war with UK, it most absolutely didn’t want war with the US. And German-Americans were loyal to both their mother country and to the US, which they rightly saw as having no good reason to enter the war against Germany. So, neither Germany nor German-Americans were anti-American. Rather, it was the Anglo-American elites who joined with Anglo-Brits in their deranged Anti-Germanism. It was they who manipulated events so that Germany and US would butt heads. It was they who acted with treachery and disgraced Americanism by promoting Anti-Germanism as a precondition for 'patriotism', just like Americanism in the current year requires us to hate on Russia, Iran, & China and kicking Palestinians in the teeth(because Jews as ruling elites want it that way). But back then, the Anglo-Americans were the ruling elites with the power to sway the sucker masses, and so war fever took off, and it became the most fervently 'patriotic' thing to hate on Germany and to pressure German-Americans to abandon German culture & identity and become mindless minions of the Anglo-American empire and march off to war to kill their own ethnic brethren.

Jews know of this history, of how the weak identities of goyim meant that immigrant-goyim could easily be manipulated to go fight and murder their own ethnic brethren in the home countries.

So far, there have been two kind of Americanisms:

1. The Anglo-American way is for all newcomers and immigrants to become ‘good Americans'(defined by ruling elites) and turning against their nations of origin. Even though this required non-Anglo immigrants to speak English and adopt social norms rooted in English tradition, it also entailed Anglo-Americans favoring a comprehensive Americanism over their own racial-tribal identity. Non-Anglos would adopt certain Anglo ways while Anglos would drop their Anglo identity and just become 'American'.

2. The Jewish-American way is for all newcomers and immigrants to become friends of Israel and the loyal puppets of the Jewish ruling elites. Immigrant politicians are more likely to pontificate about their love of Israel than for their own countries or cultures of origin. So, while all goy groups must favor Jew-SA over their own tribal identities, Jewish-America's main loyalty is allowed to remain with World Jewry and Israel. Indeed, from the Jewish perspective, America is so great and awesome not because it treats all groups the same way but because it makes all goy groups the same in favoring Jews and Israel uber alles. If Anglo-Americans melded with non-Anglos who melded into the Greater America, Jewish-Americans remain outside the melting pot, which is stirred to turn all goyim into kosher soup. Thus, so-called 'multi-culturalism' was a fraud. It wasn't about each identity favoring its own above others but all identities favoring Jews(and blacks and homos) over not only whites but their own. If Democrats are truly 'multi-cultural', how many of them would praise an Iranian-American for siding with Iran, his mother country, over Israel and Jewish-supremacist interests? Zilch and nada.

The Anglo-American Way(1) is now useless, especially because WASPS betrayed their own principles. The very people, who had pressured German-Americans, Italian-Americans, and Japanese-Americans to turn against their own tribal-ethnic origins in the name of 'patriotism', ended up handing elite levers of power over to the group that most resolutely refused to turn their backs on their own kind around the world. Yes, the Jews.

So, how do you like that? Anglo-Americans had been telling all newcomers to change their loyalty from their mother countries to the new country on the basis of freedom, democracy, and patriotism; after all, Anglo-colonists had done just that in the founding of America when they worked with Monarcho-France to overthrow British rule in the colonies. But if this was the Iron Logic of Americanism, why didn’t Anglo elites make sure Jews conformed to it as well? Given that Jews refused to, why did Wasps pass their power to the Tribe, the very people who most defied the rules of Americanism? Ironically, Anglo-American Way ended up handing the top prize to the very group that did most to defile the Iron Law of Anglo-Americanism.

Of course, one may argue that the biggest rule of Americanism really boiled down to winner-takes-all; and Jews being smarter, stronger-willed, more united, and more devious, just happened to beat out the Anglos. To be sure, Jews used trickery, often reviling the Anglos for their 'racism' and failure to live up to universal ideals of equality, thus lending the impression that greater Jewish Power would lead to a more colorblind and just system for all.
Well, fast forward to today, and Americanism is all about blind support of Zionist Wars, Jewish Supremacism, dehumanization of Palestinians, and anti-Russian hysteria. It is also about homos uber alles as Jews regard 'gays' as their closest allies and agents. Homos are bored with 'gay rights' and now demand Gay Rites as the new mass cult. It also means blacks, as profitable and symbolic assets of Jews, get to romp around and rob & beat up people while White America kneel before the portraits of George Floyd. The Jewish Media hardly cover stories of the victims of black thuggery; they might as well be Palestinians in the West Bank. Some equality.

If the Anglo-American Way is toast, what about the Jewish-American Way(2) that currently serves as orthodoxy? It totally sucks because it’s about shabbos goyim groveling at the feet of Jews. It’s embarrassing. Jews are praised for their tribalism or putting Jewishness uber alles, BUT goyim would be reproached for even thinking to favor their deeper identity over the New Americanism that isn’t even about generic citizenism but about how all must bow down before Zion and hate whatever that happens to be on the Jewish shit-list. Hate Russia and Iran! Turn your back on the Palestinians! Who cares about all those dead Arabs/Muslims from the Wars for Israel? And maybe China is also on the shit-list, so hate it too!

Any goy who falls for this is an idiot.

So, is there a Third American Way? Yes. It calls upon all groups to emulate the Jews, at least to a degree, and favor their own deep identities and histories over the Anglo-American Way(now defunct as Anglos betrayed their own principles by sucking up to ultra-tribal Jews) and over the Jewish-American Way(that hypocritically says Jews get to favor Jewishness uber alles while all goy groups must put Jewish-controlled Americanism over their own identities and cultures).

The only way forward is for American goy groups to rediscover and reconnect with their own roots and kind. So, if you’re Russian-American, choose Russia over Jewish-dominated US. If you’re Iranian, choose Iran over the Jew-SA. If you’re Chinese, favor China over US as the Zion King. If you’re Mexican, the hell with gringos-who-cuck-to-Jews. (Or should it be 'gringx' since it went from 'Latino' to 'Latinx'?)

As for the German-American community, it must revive what was so rudely interrupted and forsaken during World War I. Bring back German language, culture, pride, and heritage. And rewrite the World War I narrative. It wasn’t Germany and German-Americans who turned on the Anglo World but vice versa… with grave consequences for all the world. Anglos must bear blame for their perfidy, especially against their racial cousins. German-Americans must first and foremost become Germans uber alles.

And if any milquetoast conzo or libby-dib whines, “But what about colorblind Americanism?”, just ask the idiot, “If you care about Americanism as a universal proposition, why does it revolve around Jewish Supremacism?”

For Anglo-America to have handed the throne to ultra-tribalist Jews but then insist that "all goy groups must favor generic colorblind Americanism over their own tribalism" is truly rich in irony, hypocrisy, and cravenness toward Zion. If they really believe this, they should begin with Jews who are the premier violators of the principle. But current Americanism is a stupidism that is incapable of saying what must be said.

FALSE FLAGS: THE SECRET HISTORY OF AL QAEDA — PART 2: 9/11 - The Corbett Report

The Most Important Fact of Post-Cold-War Globalist Hegemony is that Jewish Power won the INVISIBLE WAR

When we think of wars, we usually think of military conflicts. The US has been involved in many of those and won most of them. Even when it lost, the other side suffered far greater harm than the US. It’s been said the US lost the Vietnam War, but when we consider the respective damages suffered by both nations, there is simply no comparison. The Vietnamese forced the US to give up South Vietnam but suffered most of the losses. It was nearly a Pyrrhic Victory as the US proper remained untouched(except by anti-war protests) whereas Vietnam had to rebuild nearly everything up from scratch. Think of Dragline(George Kennedy)'s 'loss' to Paul Newman's character in COOL HAND LUKE. Dragline walks away, but Luke got all the lumps. Many argue that the US lost in Iraq too, but then, who'd be the winner? It certainly wasn't the Iraqis who were rocked not only by the invasion but by ensuing civil strife that tore the nation apart(and continues to haunt them to this day). The other great 'war' of the 20th century was known as the 'Cold War' where the US and USSR managed not to confront each other directly, mainly out of fear of World War III that might even include nuclear weapons. Thus, the Cold War was considered a war of nerves than of arms. Still, both sides used proxies who died in the millions and for whom the 'cold war' was anything but a game of bluff and brinkmanship.

Anyway, there is a kind of war no less crucial than military wars(and far more consequential than 'cold wars'). It might be called the Invisible War. Beginning in the Sixties and especially following the end of the Cold War, the Power within the US was largely determined by the outcome of an Invisible War. It was this War, more than the Cold War and its end, that shaped the future of America and the World, much of which is but a political, economic, and cultural colony of the US-as-lone superpower. USSR had once been a hegemon and global player in both hard and soft power, but ultimately it failed to win the hearts & minds, eyes & ears, (and/or the loins and groins) of the masses of the world who could see that the 'Free World' was winning in Food and Feels. So, once the Soviet system collapsed(or was collapsed from within by wanna-be oligarchs who wanted to profit from being part of the World Order), the question was which group would get to shape America’s lone-superpower agenda for the entire world? Controlling America is like having a machine gun in a room where others have sticks or, at most, pistols.

The outcome of the Invisible War mattered a great deal especially because the US came to be ethnically & racially diverse. Victory of one group over the other could alter the 'racial' character of the US agenda. All nations experience Invisible Wars among various groups contending for dominance, but in a homogeneous nation, the dominant race-and-culture remains in charge regardless as to which side wins. Suppose there are various factions vying for power in China. Whichever wins, China would be controlled by Chinese, and its policy vis-a-vis the rest of the world would be Sino-centric. But imagine if the invisible war(of jockeying for power) in China were fought among Chinese and various non-Chinese groups. Perchance, if a non-Chinese group gained top power in China, it could fundamentally change the nature of China's place in the world because it'd likely use China to serve its own tribal interests than what is good for most Chinese people. In a way, China was trapped in such condition under the rule of Manchu dynasties whose relation to China was ambiguous. In some ways, they were part of Chinese civilization, but they also regarded the Chinese as their subjects, and that partly explains why, when threatened by Western Imperialism, they feared the awakening of Chinese Nationalism as much as they feared foreign aggression — Chinese nationalist uprising to do away with the 'foreign devils' might just as well sweep aside the Manchu ruling elites as well.
Likewise, the reason why so much hung in the balance in Russia of the 1990s and 2000s was because the success or failure of Putinism would decide whether Russia would remain sovereign or fall into the clutches of Jewish-supremacist globalists. (It was perhaps a shock for many Russians to realize the full extent to which American Jews had consolidated power during the Cold War, indeed even to the point of dictating their agenda to the once-great Wasps reduced to pushovers of the Chutzpah Clan.) Though a tiny minority in Russia, the Jews with their higher IQ, radical will, & support from World Jewry almost managed to wrest total control of the Russian nation. Had the Jews gained total dominance, the Russian state wouldn't have served the Russian people but would have been exploited, manipulated, and abused simply to maximize (the mostly extractive)Jewish Power around the world.

When America was mostly white and Anglo-ruled(and Anglo-Americanized even among non-Anglo white ethnics, most of whom were Christian and traced their roots back to Europe), the outcome of the Invisible War(among various factions of Anglo-American and/or Anglo-Americanized white gentile groups) had far less dire consequences regardless of which side won. In the end, it was one bunch of Anglo-Americans or Anglo-Americanized gentile whites or another bunch of the more-or-less the same. Liberal or Conservative, American Interests remained essentially white-and-Anglo-centric, and this was more-or-less just because the US for most of its history was overwhelmingly white and Christian. (It's like the aftermath of the Civil War when, once the dust settled, America was still ruled by white Christian gentiles who, in sympathy with their defeated racial brethren in the South, didn't throw them to the wolves or apes of ghastly black power.) Thus, the white elites were representative of their racial masses, and the masses were supportive of their racial elites.
And on this basis, the entire world knew what American Power was really about — an expansive Anglo-centrism — and adjusted their positions accordingly when dealing with America. This arrangement was good for white American elites, white American masses, and nations around the world. Good or bad, right or wrong, the world understood WHO ruled America and WHAT Americanism was about in terms of its reach, promise, limitation, and hypocrisy(which is inherent to any system in the absence of real world utopias). For most of US history, the only major groups vying for power were white Northern-European Protestants, or Wasps. Even when waves of immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe added new groups in the contest of power, most of them were rapidly Anglo-Americanized and deferred to Wasp Power as deserving to rule for historical, cultural, and meritocratic reasons. Given the relatively poor governance and entrenched levels of corruption in the nations and kingdoms whence they came, they couldn't help but be impressed by the New Nation created by Anglo-Americans out of the vast wilderness.

But something fundamentally changed since the 1960s, a period when the Invisible War was no longer about white gentiles vs white gentiles(thus ensuring white gentile rule no matter which side won) but came down to enervating Wasps vs energizing Jews. This was fought in the realm of media, academia, arts, culture, finance, ideas, and various industries. But it wasn’t a simple 'turf war' between racial/ethnic/religious groups like the ones between, say, the Italian mafia and the Irish machine. The lines were NOT clearly drawn in terms of 'us' and 'them'. Invisible War happens in the realm of ideas, values, discourse, and culture, and that means your side could be seduced and recruited to serve the other side. You could be colonized by the ideas, narratives, and values of the enemy camp(posing as the friend to all). In such conflict, the winners tend to be the ones who are more energetic, creative, ruthless, and cunning in the fields of media, academia, propaganda, advertising, arts & culture, and of course, finance(as lots of money are needed to fund think tanks and lavish prizes on the willing).
The crucial problem for whites wasn't simply that Jews were more energetic and big-minded than Wasps(known for moderation, pragmatism, and empiricist caution) in the field of ideas and culture but that White Liberals were more creative and energetic than White Conservatives. Given the numerical advantage, whites could have held Jewish Power at bay IF white liberals and white conservatives had combined their power and resources. White Liberal decision in the 20th century served as the linchpin of America's destiny. Would they offer their considerable intellectual and creative talents in a racial alliance with white conservatives, OR would they side with the sneaky Jews who speciously espoused that they were not out for Jewish Power but for universal justice for all, a noble cause worthy of commitment by White Liberals so eager to do the right thing? If Jews had been honest about their agenda, their blatant tribalism would have given offense to white liberals who therefore might have sided with white conservatives to check Jewish power seeking supremacy and hegemony(not unlike the Nazis). But Jews hid their tribalism, or they white-washed it as a means to honor their tragic history as poor innocent helpless little victims. White liberals fell for the bait and threw their lot with the Jews, and there was no way that white conservatives, lacking in spark and creativity, could have fended off the combined power of Jews and White Liberals.
Also, if in times past, even victorious white liberals regarded white conservatives as their racial brethren and favored them over the Other, the victorious Jews(who edged out others in the coalition) pressed upon white liberals to hate, despise, and hold in contempt the incorrigible white conservatives who are either stupid rubes, unimaginative bigots, or crytpo-nazis. Then, it is not surprising that, over time, more and more Wasps went over to the Jewish camps as allies, servants, and finally cucks. As Jewish ideas came to dominate over White Liberal ones, not least because white liberals were also tainted with 'white guilt' that undermined their moral legitimacy — indeed, white liberal pride is mostly about how it feels more self-loathing about being white than white conservatives do, i.e., "We weep harder when we read TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD" — , the Jewish/White Liberal relationship essentially became one of teacher and student, moral master and moral slave, spiritual pimp and new age prostitute. Most Liberal Wasps pitifully came under the domination of Jewish politics. And in time, most Wasp conservative figures followed suit and were mentally-colonized by Neocon thought. Jews won not only by conflict but conversion.

Ultimately, Jews won the Invisible War in America, and that's why they've been able to push an agenda that's been turning the world upside down with Wars for Israel, Open Borders, anti-nativism, pro-invasivism, Homomania, deranged feminism, Afromania, and Jungle Fever that promotes ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs).

It is a strange agenda, of course. At its core, it is undeniably tribal and ethno-supremacist, but it is promoted as ‘western values’, ‘human rights’, or ‘universal principles’, all vague notions manipulated and distorted in meaning and implication to serve an agenda that, more often than not, aligns with Jewish supremacist machinations. But then, just like Stalinism and George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM illustrated so powerfully, the Power can shape truth to be just about anything, not least because most people are craven cowards, malleable lunkheads whose brains are clay in Jewish hands, or opportunists who will go with the strong horse(and thirty pieces of silver).
This ‘universal values’ requires the US(and that means ALL OF US who contribute to American Power) to make life hell for Muslims over there but hug them like long-lost brothers over here, especially if they are to demographically replace white Americans(and even black Americans). It’s seems crazy and illogical, but once you understand the Power and all those who serve it, what seems like contradictions on the surface make perfect sense at the core: "Is it good for Jews?" or better yet, "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?"

Contradictions of Universalism and Particularism among Ancient Greek, Jews, and Anglo-Americans

Greeks and Jews came to face the same conundrum. How to reconcile the universal resound of their ideas with the tribal ethno-centrism.

Greeks were awful proud and developed complex forms of science and governance. They conceived of political systems like democracy. It had universal implications, but Greeks had no intention of sharing the idea with barbarians. It was for Greek city-states only. But the idea eventually caught onto other civilizations.

Jews were awful proud and developed the idea of the one and only God. It had universal implications, but Jews wanted to own it for themselves. So, they came up with the Covenant that would bind God of all things to the Jewish tribe.

These two contradictions would come to shape much of Western History. West developed science and technology of universal import but sought to keep it to itself to gain power over others. West developed ideas of universal human rights but sought to restrict those rights to Western peoples.

Just as Greeks saw democracy as a Greek thing and Jews saw God as a Jewish thing, America’s Founding was also marked by a similar contradiction. It was, in a sense, a universal republic committed to principles transcending tribes and nations. And yet, it was also a nation of Anglo-Germanic stock where Christianity and English were the defacto official religion and language. It was both about big OURS encompassing all humanity and a small ours serving a specific ethnos. Thus, Anglo-Germanics would have a special place in the American experience. This was most obvious to Indians, blacks, and non-whites but even, to a lesser extent, to certain ethnic groups from Southern or Eastern Europe.

Universalism wasn’t the intention of the Greeks when they devised ideas of democracy and individuality. Similarly, Jews instinctively feared the consequences of monotheism as an abstraction. Abstractions, having been distilled from a particular reality, can pass to any people, culture, or nation. It’s like every fruit has its own sugars. So, apple sugars belong to the apple, peach sugars belong to the peach, and watermelon sugars belong to the watermelon. But when sugars are extracted from those fruits, they lose their unique attachments and just become ‘universal’ sugar that can be used to sweeten anything. It’s like when piles of wood are turned into charcoal, it no longer matters which tree they came from; they just exist to burn and provide heat.

Thus, to own and keep their own concept of God, Jews entwined the idea with the Covenant between God and Jews as the Chosen People. Thus, the Jewish God had features of a universal idea but was contractually bound to The Tribe. God was the Lord of all things, all peoples, and all everything; however, He’d chosen the Jewish People to keep the torch of greatness(like Zeus gave Athena the Aegis for safekeeping; it was her responsibility and privilege).

A similar kind of contractualism informed the founding of America as both a Republic premised on universal principles of human rights AND a Christian nation mainly of Anglo-Germanic stock.

But such contractualism — combination of universalism and particularism — tends to be unstable in the long run, especially if a people rub up against diverse groups of people either through imperialism or mass migration. Historically, Jews were never alone in their world like the Swedes in Sweden, Japanese in Japan, Hawaiian natives in Hawaii, and etc. They were always invading or being invaded by other peoples, always trading with other peoples, always bickering with other peoples, always hating and co-existing with other peoples. Thus, the potent bottle of Jewish nitroglycerin got shaken left and right, hither and thither, and the formula finally exploded into a truly universalized idea of God for all peoples of the Earth.

As for Anglo-Americans, their importation of large numbers of black Africans to toil as slaves and then huge numbers of ‘ethnic’ European immigrants — especially the feisty and pushy Jews — led to increasing pressures to transform America into a ‘proposition’. As long as America was overwhelmingly(and proudly) of Northern European stock, it could maintain both the ‘radicalism’ of the Revolution and the ‘racialism’ of the original Northern European stock.
But as America filled up with growing numbers of blacks(with high birthrate) and ethnic white Americans(who strove for the same rights and privileges as the Wasps), America lurched more toward abstract universal principles(though, for some reason, it also favors three groups for special praise and recognition: All Americans must support Israel, all Americans must worship Homomania or Queertianity as the new religion, all of Anglosphere must celebrate blackness for an entire month). Thus, even though the founding ideas of the American republic/democracy had once been almost synonymous with the Anglo-American people, their eventual universalization undermined Wasp power and then white power in general, with the exception of Jewish power.

But then, Jews didn’t so much destroy the Founding Contradiction/Hypocrisy as filch it for themselves. It’s like the pigs in ANIMAL FARM didn’t so much distribute human goodies equally among the animals as keep the choicest portions for themselves. The Founding Contradiction continues in altered form in favoring Jews as the quintessential Americans. After all, we are told that America is about both universal commitment to ‘tolerance’ & ‘diversity' AND total support of Israel as the ‘closest ally’ and 'best friend' of America. Thus, the core of Americanism continues to be about universalism + tribalism, i.e. Jews are ‘more equally’ American than other Americans. The crucial factor is that that tribalist element of Americanism passed from Wasps to Jews.

Consider that all Americans are NOT forced to praise or support Iran, Russia, China, Germany, Mexico, Egypt, and etc.(even though Americans come from those nations), but all Americans are forced to have their taxpayer money support Israel.

That has been the great Jewish Globalist Swindle. Jewish globalists would have us believe that Bad Old America betrayed its universal principles by favoring the Anglo-American Tribe, but thankfully, such favoritism is no longer viable in Good New America where no group is favored over others and where supremacism has no place.
But any cursory observation of American reality makes it plainly obvious that the system is rigged in favor of Jewish tribalism. American Universalism now means ALL Americans must support Israel and obey Jewish globalists.