We do not really have freedom of speech. Say “ni**er” once and you can lose a job of thirty years. Or criticize Jews, Israel, blacks, homosexuals, Muslims, feminists, or transsexuals.
There is direct censorship and indirect censorship. Direct censorship is what China has. It prohibits certain kind of speech, period. Indirect censorship is what the US has in increasing measure. You can say whatever, but if you say the 'wrong' thing, the consequences are so dire(especially economically) that you are effectively tarred & feathered, shunned and destroyed. Rick Sanchez found out how this works after he said Jews dominate in the media. And CNN recently fired a black guy for defending Palestine at the UN. https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/1068275992685203457
Marc Lamont Hill dared to mention that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map and that the current Zionist regime uses Apartheid Policies in Occupied West Bank as continuation of Western Imperialism that wages war on indigenous nationalism of the Palestinian people. Jew-run CNN got rid of him, which goes to show that Jews are holier than blacks(and certainly the long-suffering Palestinians).
Personally, I think there are some cases where firing-based-on-speech is warranted. If an organization is inherently ideological, then it has every right to hire or fire people based on their views and convictions. So, if National Review feels that one of its writers is too leftist, he may be fired. Or a person that seems hostile to Zionism may be fired by Commentary Magazine that is committed to Israel First Policy.
But most professions are non-ideological, and it seems utterly wrong to fire someone on the basis of creed, conscience, or conviction. And progressives would have agreed with this position in the 50s when many communists and fellow-travelers were either fired/blacklisted or threatened with such, not least in Hollywood. Also, as long as a person performs his duties well at work, what does it matter what he believes in his personal life? If one's personal creed, ideology, or faith is the basis of whether he can have a job or use financial services, then we no longer have a free society. According to Jewish-controlled PC, in order for you to be able to work and live, it means you can't have certain personal beliefs. Personal conviction and creed have been professionalized, i.e. no work and wages for people with certain views. Now, imagine if a business fires anyone suspected of being a Zionist on the basis that Zionism is imperialism and commits 'genocide' against Palestinians. Would Jews tolerate this? Of course not. And I would agree with Jews. No Jew should be fired for his Zionist beliefs EVEN IF the owner of the business believes Zionism is evil. Richard Dawkins is virulently anti-religious and believes religious faith is a mental disease of ignorance and hatred. But if he owned a trucking company, should he fire people on the basis of their faith because he believes religion is a 'hate system of the mind'?
Now, there are certain exceptions. Certain jobs are publicity-oriented and involve putting forth an image. So, if a company wants to project a certain kind of image or message and IF its representative or spokesman or spokeswoman is associated with certain kind of ideology, I can see why the company would want to let that person go. If a company is about Family Values and if it turns out that its representative is a wild swinger and promotes promiscuity, I can see why the company would let that person go EVEN IF the person acts wild in his personal life. But most jobs are not publicity-related, and it is simply wrong to deny someone work and wages based on what he believes in his personal life.
This is why China's social credit system is chilling. It will create a nation of conformist cowards. China is spiraling back into the mindset that made it fall behind. A nation where everyone is too afraid to say his piece. New China may allow money-making, but when a society favors profits over freedom and conscience, it becomes crass, shallow, and materialistic.
Now, the Chinese may be pushing such a rule because they see the Free West as decadent and degenerate as a result of excess freedom. But this is where the Chinese would be wrong. The West rotted from lopsided freedom that favored the power and expression of certain groups over others. West lost its sense of balance because voices of certain groups and interests were effectively silenced. It's like ecology. If you get rid of certain species, the natural balance goes out of whack and things fall apart. If you get rid of predators, it may seem good for the prey animals, but in time, the herbivores multiply and eat up all the vegetation and destroy their habitats. So, there has to be a balance of prey and predators in nature. The problem of EU is that following WWII, the Right was effectively silenced because it was associated with Nazism. Thus, leftist elements grew too strong and out-of-control. Now, leftism is invaluable to modern society, but it needs to be balanced by rightism that is also essential to social equilibrium. But suppression of the right led to overgrowth of leftism that led to crazy stuff like May 68 lunacy that paved the way for current degenerate France. When left and right were both well-represented, they had to compete to remain healthy and strong. But once the left was allowed to totally dominate culturally and ideologically, it grew decadent and degenerate from corruption and self-satisfaction.
So, if China thinks the West became crazy due to excess of free speech and freedom in general, it would be wrong. The West grew sick from suppression of rightist freedoms and expressions in favor of leftist ideology and obsessions. In the West, even the far-left was protected in academia and media BUT the far-right was banned. Only the wussy cuck-right and bland 'white bread' right were tolerated. If any rightist lurched slightly more rightward, he was denounced as 'far right'. As Jonathan Haidt has argued, Western academia is suffering from lack of real discourse and back-and-forth argumentation. Because the leftists are protected from challenge by rightists, the former has grown lazy, corrupt, decadent, and flabby. Their hysterics are really about cowardice and unwillingness to face real challenge from the Right. They demand protection from being 'triggered' by wrongthink or 'hate speech'. They rarely directly address the voices on the Right. They just go for lazy short-cut of denouncing others as 'racist' or 'nazi'.
But the problem isn't merely ideological but ethnic. When Wasps(or Anglo-Americans) ruled America, it was fair game to notice that (1) Anglos got the power (2) Anglos got the privilege (3) Anglos got the connections (4) Anglos hogged the prestige. So, despite the great power of Anglos, they came under scrutiny and criticism, not least by reformist Anglos who thought criticism and self-criticism were good things. Thus, there was a lively debate among Wasps, Irish Catholics, various ethnics, Jews, and others. Though blacks were suppressed for most of US history, they too became vocal and offered their perspective and made demands that had validity. In terms of social debate, the period from mid 50s to the mid 80s were probably the golden age of free speech and debate. With each year, there was more push for free speech, and many sides had their say. But the worrying development in that period was the growing sacralization of Jews and blacks. It was one thing to allow Jews and blacks to make their case and join in the national debate. Surely, Jews and blacks had their own grievances and legit demands. But, just as undeniable was the fact that Jews and blacks also caused a lot of problems that harmed other groups. Jewish role in US foreign policy led to fiasco in the Middle East, especially at cost to Palestinians. And even though the Civil Rights Movement was a great event in US history(and there's no denying the injustices done to blacks), it was also true that blacks posed a threat to other races because blacks are more muscular and more aggressive by nature. So, once blacks got equal legal protections, they used much of their freedom to attack, rape, rob, and murder other peoples, leading to white flight among not only white conservatives but white liberals and Jews. So, in a truly free society, not only would Jews and blacks get to have their say against goyim & whites but goyim & whites would get to air their grievances against Jews and blacks. That way, all sides would say their piece and all sides would be checked and balanced by healthy and constructive counter-criticism. But the consecration of Jews and blacks as holy-schmoly groups made this nearly impossible. So, while Jews could scream about 'anti-Semites' and 'Nazis' endlessly -- Jews now cry 'nazi' like the kid cried 'wolf' -- , we are not allowed to notice Jewish power, Jewish abuses, and Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. And no matter how much crime and violence blacks commit, we are supposed to see Negroes only through the rose-tinted glasses of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD and MLK sermons. And no matter how many whites(and non-blacks) fall victim to black robbery, beatings, rapes, and murders, we are supposed to wake up Groundhogday-like and dream of supposedly angelic Emmett Till.
When a group is sacralized in a supposedly secular society, the effect is essentially theocratic. Jews and blacks are holy-schmoly in the US, and so, we can't have a honest debate about the problems they cause. We can't talk about Jewish role in communism, Zionist role in Middle East Wars, globalist Jewish economic looting of Russia in the 90s, and Neocon recruitment of Neo-Nazis in Ukraine. And it doesn't matter how many times blacks burn down cities and assault/rob people. It is simply 'racist' to notice that blacks, being more muscular and more aggressive, tend to commit far more crime and violence than other groups. US has become essentially an ethno-theocracy where we must always speak of Jews and blacks in hushed tones.
Of course, homos joined Jews and blacks in the holy-schmoly pantheon. Why? Because Jews control media, academia, finance, and deep state. And Jews decided homos are their perfect ally as fellow high-achieving minority elites. Because homos were made holy-schmoly(and associated with holier-schmolier Jews), even cultural conservatives clammed up about the Homo Agenda. They were afraid of being labeled 'homophobic', an especially bogus term cooked up by Jews to imply that if you don't sufficiently honor and praise homos, you are suffering from mental malady of phobic proportions. And so, homos & trannies and fecal penetration & penis-and-ball-cutting were associated with 'rainbows' and 'pride'. Indeed, 'gay pride' simply became 'Pride', as if to suggest the essence of pride = homo buggery and tranny dick-cutting. And if you found homo-fecal-penetration and tranny penis-cutting to be gross and sick and said so, you were blacklisted and fired worse than any Jewish communist during the so-called 'McCarthy Era'. At least the HUAC blacklists ended in a few yrs. These Jewish led PC blacklists last forever because Jewish Power has a near-Stalinist grip on media, academia, and deep state.
The fact is Homomania-as-neo-religion(that festoons churches with 'gay colors') and 'Gay Marriage' would never have become New Western Values IF there had been real free speech that allowed all sides to have their say. If real free debate had been allowed on the Homo Agenda, the lies and falsehoods could easily have been exposed. But, the Jewish-controlled media used the 'rainbow' idolatry to elevate Homo-worship as a new religion in the West. If you were not with the sacred program, you were a blasphemer, a 'homophobe' who must be econo-excommunicated from work & wages. Or a bakery must be sued out of existence by the 'gay cabal' with the full backing of Jewish Supremacist law firms. Jewish Power treats decent moral bakeries like Zionists treat Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank. Jewish Power says 'my way or the highway'.
In Europe, a continent with no legal protection of free speech, Jewish pressure led to criminalization of speech deemed offensive to Jews and homos(and even African migrant-invaders). In the US, where Constitution guarantees free speech, the culture of open discourse was destroyed by indirect censorship and ethno-homo-theocracy. Even though Jewish Power couldn't ban free speech, its control of media and finance meant they could destroy anyone or any group that dared to be politically incorrect toward Jews, blacks, and homos. Thus, anyone who wanted to keep his job or reputation had to clam up about certain things, no matter how true or based on facts. Also, the sacralization of Jews, blacks, and homos meant that they could spew any amount of hateful, rabid, and virulent venom at goyim, whites, Christians, straight people, and etc. BUT they themselves were PROTECTED from critical speech that dared to expose their corruption, abuses, and fraudulence. This is why the West grew sick. Not from freedom but lopsided monopoly of freedom for certain groups, esp. Jews, blacks, and Homos as the Holy-Schmoly Three.
Now, one could argue that China's censorship is preferable to American censorship because China is about Chinese nationalists ruling over Chinese people. So, the main theme of censorship is "Is it good for China as a whole?" In contrast, the US is a nation where the Jewish 2% rules over 98% that is goyim. So, the central theme of American Censorship is "Is it good for the 2% at the expense of the 98%?" Also, if China is about Chinese Majority Pride, the overwhelming theme for the White American Majority is White Guilt and White Shame. So, while Chinese government boosts Majority Chineseness, American government suppresses Majority Whiteness(and even pushes policies to turn the white majority into just another minority, as already happened in California, increasingly the land of oligarchs and helots, the vision of BLADE RUNNER).
Still, censorship will hurt China too in the long run because a nation that penalizes conscience and courage will result in increasing conformism and crassness.
OVER THE PAST year, two popular forums for men who identify as involuntary celibates, or incels, have been banned by Reddit and a domain registrar in response to members’ history of toxic misogyny and celebrating violence against women.
Jewish-run music industry promote rappers who call women ho's and worse. They sing about all sorts of degeneracy. And yet, these ugly rappers who spew garbage are showered with million dollar contracts. And Music Industry and Pornography(also controlled by Jews) promote white women as whores, sluts, and sex meat. And yet, these industries are allowed to rake in billions. I agree that some incels are nuts and retarded, but it is amusing that they are demeaned as 'misogynists' in a culture that idolizes rappers, women-as-sluts, and gun-toting morons on TV. The message of much of Pop Music is 'muh dic*' and 'you is a ho'. The mass media promote the likes of Lena Dunham. Does anyone really think such promotes respect for women? Really?
Attacking through the payment processors is a new wrinkle on that approach.
Does Wired have the courage to address the JQ or Jewish Question? Is Wired owned by Jewish oligarchs? The fact is Jews pioneered the means of abusing the monopoly of payment processers to deny Free Spend to groups they hate. Jews hate A LOT of people. Jews hate Palestinians, so BDS groups have been deplatformed and denied payment processing. Jews hate Russia and Iran, and both nations have been sanctioned. While the criminal terrorist imperialist state of Israel gets showered with billions of US tax payer dollars, critics of Jews are effectively denied free speech and free spend where it counts: in the public forum.
After a gunman allegedly killed 11 people in a Pittsburgh synagogue, a social media platform he frequented was driven offline for nearly a week when its payment service providers, web host, and domain registrar dropped contracts with the company. A similar fate befell the primary forum for incels in the wake of the related Toronto terror attack carried out by a self-professed incel, and neo-Nazi site the Daily Stormer after Charlottesville. However, most cases are not as clear cut.
GAB is a free speech platform and allows any speech as long as it's legal. Why was it held accountable for what the Pittsburgh shooter did? Plenty of people on Twitter and Youtube went off to commit crimes and murder. If anything, Twitter protects much of antifa lunacy and hosts Deep State goons who've been behind wars, surveillance, censorship, propaganda, subversion of foreign nations, and torture. Also, 11 people died in Pittsburgh. In contrast, a million Muslims have been killed in Wars for Israel. Israel uses IDF death squads to mow down Palestinians who want to return home. 2018 is the 70th anniversary of the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map. Israel occupies West Bank and enforces Apartheid. US and Israel are allied with terrorist state of Saudi Arabia that tortures/murders Journalists and drops bombs on Yemen(which began under Obama and Hillary). Neocon Jews aided Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to take down a democratically elected government. Obama and Hillary destroyed Libya. US Deep State has been behind globalist imperialism. Why are creeps like that allowed to have platforms and use financial power? Madeline Albright said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi kids. Sheldon Adelson urged the US to drop a nuke on Iran. These are psychos, and yet they get to operate at the upper echelons of US power. They are not de-platformed and de-funded even though they've been behind Zionist imperialism and Wars for Israel that murdered so many.
As for Daily Stormer, yes it is a stupid trashy clown neo-nazi website, but the fiasco at Charlottesville was the result of Jewish mayor, black police chief, and Antifa thugs. The Alt Right people, like them or not, gathered to defend a monument and give speeches. They did everything by the book. They had the Constitution on their side for free speech and free assembly. But the city officials conspired to shut down the event and then shove the Alt Right people into a crowd of Antifa scum who went on rampage. If there is any justice in the world, the Jewish mayor and police chief should be in jail, and those Antifa goons should have been locked up. But there is no justice. We have the might-is-right of Jewish supremacist power.
But I see that Wired is a Jewish-Zionist rag that is perfectly fine with Jewish supremacism and violation of free speech. Daily Stormer is shit, but it was not behind the Iraq War, Libya destruction, the coup in Ukraine, and the endless murders of Palestinian women and children by IDF death squads. If any people need to be brought down and banned, it is Judeo-Nazis who force Americans to support the monstrous state of Israel and support Jewish Hate Campaigns against Russia, Iran, Syria, Palestinians, and white patriots.
'Minority Rights' means Different things to Minority Elites and Minority Underclass. To Minority Elites, it means the Right to Rule. To Minority Underclass, it means struggle for representation. Jewish Minority Overlords and Non-White Minority Underclass.
There are different meanings to ‘minority rights’. We must ask, what kind of minority are we talking about, and what is meant by ‘rights’?
After all, both British imperialist elites and the native Untouchables were minorities in India. But whereas one minority, the Brits, was at the top, the other minority, the Untouchables, was at the bottom.
For the British imperialists, ‘minority rights’ meant the right to rule over Hindu(and Muslim) masses. For the Untouchables, 'minority rights’ would have meant the modest hope of having the same legal protections conferred upon other Indians of 'higher' castes.
A similar confusion of meaning perplexes the Current West when it comes to 'minorities' and 'rights'. After all, right-to-rule(like the Divine Rights) is light years apart from right-to-representation. One is for kings, the other is for the peons. (To be sure, universal rights flowed from elite rights. The idea of rights began at the top and gradually reached the bottom.)
In the US and UK, Jews are the ruling minority or the minority elites. (Homos also belong to this group.) But Mexicans, many blacks, and many immigrant groups are either part of the minority underclass or minority ordinary folks; they have no special power or out-sized ambitions & expectations(though blacks have out-sized egos that demand attention and adulation, the blings and glitter). Asians do better academically & economically than most other immigrant groups, but their dim sense of identity and servile attitude don't translate to much power and prestige. Even in Hawaii where yellows constitute the majority, they lack political will or cultural vigor. They are just parrots and puppets of PC emanating from Harvard and Hollywood.
So, ‘minority rights’ means different things to Jews and to other minorities. For Jews, it means the quasi-divine right to rule over US & UK and make demands & dictate policy. Old ‘antisemitism’ used to mean denial of basic rights and liberties to Jews. New ‘antisemitism’ means any kind of criticism of or challenge(no matter how justified) to the Jewish supremacist right-to-rule over goyim. And the logic is similarly operative with homo politics. ‘Gay rights’ used to mean the tolerance of allowing homos be homo and do their own thing without persecution. Today, ‘gay rights’(or Gay Rites as the neo-religion of Homomania) means we must admire, celebrate, and worship homos as angels and even change marriage laws to appease the Great Holy Homo. It means those who mock or deride the so-called LGBTQXYZ community, culture, lifestyle, or agenda must be quarantined as being afflicted with 'phobia' and be blacklisted. (In Castro's Cuba, homos suspected of HIV were quarantined and stigmatized. In the Jew-run West, sane people who seen LGBTQ nonsense for what it is are effectively contained and blacklisted from engaging in social discourse and economic competition.) And we must even put homo regalia(or re-gay-lia) in churches. It’s as if homos have some divine right to be admired and adulated, and so, we humble folks must perform our obligatory duty to homos as our 'spiritual' superiors. In all big cities, it is virtually mandatory for all politicians and 'respectable' citizens to sing hosannas to homos & trannies and take part in 'gay pride' parades. Indeed, people mustn’t even joke about(or cringe over) something as ridiculous as Bruce Jenner calling himself 'Caitlyn' or Bradley Manning(as Chelsea) expressing joy over replacing his penis and balls with a fake 'vagina'. (In the UK, a criminal investigation is under way to hunt the man who cursed out precious Brucie.) We must laud and applaud like dumb dogs at the feet of their master.
Now, there are other minorities that also demand special favors. Blacks demand affirmative action, and Mexicans demand affirmative immigration(amnesty). But many blacks and Mexicans are on the bottom looking up. Their hope is to reach the middle. (To be sure, too many blacks just fantasize about being sports stars or rappers, goals out of reach for most blacks, but then, blacks are stupid.) But even if blacks and browns demand special favors, they won’t amount to much and will never gain elite power in the West(unless they race-mix with higher-IQ Jews, whites, or Asians). Historically, all they could hope for was equality(and then some) under the law.
In contrast, equality of any kind isn’t good enough for Jews(and homos) anymore. For them, ‘rights’ means something closer to ‘divine right to rule’. Jews are now addicted to supremacism and won't settle for anything less. The New 'Antisemitism' isn't about denying Jews basic rights(what the rest of us have) but refusing to cave to all their demands(as rightful decrees of overlords who deign to rule over us as 'sheeple'). But the current arrangement makes Jews nervous because it is natural for the masses to resent and challenge the ruling elites, especially if of another racial, ethnic, and/or religious identity. Jews are different from non-Jews both ethnically and religiously. This makes Jews nervous because they, as the current ruling elites, make natural focus of the critics of power and populist angst.
So, to morally shield their power, Jews associate themselves with minorities who are relatively powerless. (Notice how Jews rig admissions at Ivy League Schools to favor Jewish students but obfuscate this operation by making all the usual noises about the need for 'Diversity'. Jews hide behind affirmative action for blacks and browns to justify the current 'holistic' system, the main agenda of which is to favor Jews uber alles.)
Since many immigrant groups have historically arrived with little and started on the bottom), they've been pegged in the popular imagination as humble and vulnerable(like a newborn baby), indeed as if Ellis Island Blues is still the anthem of New America. So, Jews associate with immigrants as 'fellow minorities'. This way, Jewish minority supremacist power is morally sanctified in association with the 'huddled masses' of recent arrivals who presumably need protection from the native populist mobs and nationalist 'xenophobes'. By posturing as noble defenders and champions of newly arrived minority immigrants, Jewish minority supremacist elites pose with(and even as) the 'powerless' by association. It's like the desperate alliance of the minority Afrikaner minority elite and the black Inkatha Freedom Party in the twilight yrs of Apartheid South Africa. Even though whites were at the top and Inkatha party members were on the bottom, they were both minorities(racial or political) and faced the challenge of the ANC party supported by the great majority of blacks. (Inkatha Party, as the political embodiment of the historically aggressive & expansionist Zulus, found common ground with European-Imperialists who came to dominate South Africa.)
The logic behind Jewish minority uber-elite alliance with economically depressed non-white minorities(mainly browns and blacks) and scab-immigrant-mercenaries is comical if one thinks about it. (Keep in mind the British Imperialists also used Migration-Collaboration to bolster their empire. Brits used Chinese migrant-minorities in Southeast Asia and shipped tons of Asian Indians to Africa to do their bidding. It was also under British Empire that the Jewish migration to Palestine began in earnest, and we know how that turned out for the native Arabs. Today, Jews control US & EU and use mass-migrations of non-whites to alter the balance of power in the West by reducing native whites into just another minority at the mercy of the divide-and-rule master strategy of the Tribe.) Imagine if the British Imperialist Elites in India sided with the Untouchables as ‘fellow minorities’ against the ‘bigoted’ and ‘populist’ masses of Hindus and Muslims demanding national liberation and independence from alien imperialism. Imagine the gall of the British ruling minority elite making overtures to the Untouchables, the underclass minority, and claiming shared victim-hood as ‘fellow minorities’ regardless of the fact that the British minority rule as the Master Class whereas the Untouchable minority is mired in poverty at the bottom. That would have been pretty amusing. But devious as the Brits could be, they didn't have the sheer audacity of chutzpah to pull off something that ridiculous.
That said, there were times when the Brits did advance the Minority Issue to morally justify their rule over India. In Richard Attenborough’s movie GANDHI, the British ruling minority presents itself as the protective guarantors for the Muslim minority from the potentially domineering Hindu majority were India to gain independence. The Brits were "masters in someone else's home" just like Jewish globo-homo elites are currently in the West. For Jews, everything is a question of "Is it good for Jews?", and this is why Jews get hysterical when whites begin to ask a similar question, i.e. "Is Jewish power good for whites?" As far as Jews are concerned, Jews and whites must share the same premise: "Is it good for Jews?" Jews must operate to serve Jewish interests, and so must white folks. One might call it shared interest and destiny, but the same can be said for master and dog. Master and dog both act on the basis of "Is it good for the master?" Shared interest is not the same thing as common interest. In a case of common interest, both sides have autonomy and arrive at a compromise that benefits both sides more-or-less equally. In contrast, there is no guarantee of parity in shared interest. Master and slave have shared interest, but it's all about the slave serving the master. Jews and whites cooperating on the basis of either 'Is it good for Jews?' or 'Is it good for whites?' is a case of shared interest, but the former is about whites serving Jews whereas the latter is about Jews serving whites. It makes all the difference.
Thankfully for India, it had a leader of Gandhi’s caliber who was witty, shrewd, and devious enough to match wits like a lawyer with the British. (He would have made Professor Kingsfield of PAPER CHASE proud.) Too bad the West lacks such leaders with just the right combination of cleverness, will, tenacity, and resolve. Back then, the British Imperialists claimed that India was ‘British’. Now, the bloody fools in UK, under the influence of their Jewish masters, say non-white immigrant-invaders are the ‘New British’.
Gandhi urged Indians to engage in civil disobedience until the British minority elites left. Maybe white Europeans can do something similar. A strategy of mass non-cooperation and civil disobedience until the West is cleansed of globo-homo imperialism, cuck-collaborators, and Third World migrant-invaders & African sexual colonizers doing ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs). Since overt resistance has been banned by the PC state, whites can exert their collective will through mass non-cooperation. (Whites can start by asserting that they will no longer support WARS FOR ISRAEL and act as goons for Jewish Imperialists. Let Jews fight their own wars.) But then, so many whites have been led to believe that Diversity is sacrosanct and that restoration of nationalism is unacceptable. After all, PC reminds them endlessly that the truest expression of 'European(or Western) values' is hankering for spicy exotic restaurants and jungle fever mating with Negroes. (Interestingly enough, Brexit won in UK because of older voters, but Macron won in France especially with the older demographic, 80% of whom chose him over Marine Le Pen.)
The future of Europe will be determined by whether it can produce leaders like Gandhi, Mao, Lenin, Ataturk, Mussolini, Castro, T. E. Lawrence, Trotsky, Stalin, Hitler, DeGaulle, and maybe Putin(as fate of Russia is still uncertain). While some of those men were pathological and dangerous, they could play politics on the grandest scale. When a civilization is faced with an 'existential' crisis, it calls out for visionaries and prophets, not technocrats, paper-shufflers, and wine-sippers. Run-of-the-mill 'leaders' won’t do. The current heads of state in Europe are not leaders but spineless flunkies of globalist oligarchs(with Jews having the most power due to Moral Advantage stemming from Shoah-Worship, the reigning religion of the West; a white goy with $10 billion is richer than a Jew with $1 billion, but the latter has 'spiritual' advantage because the Shoah Cult confers holiness upon him; the material has a price tag whereas the spiritual is priceless, and Jews have priceless value due to their moral exploitation of the WWII tragedy). Just look at Justin Trudeau the Man-Child cuck of Jewish donors. Why did so many Canadians vote for such pathetic clowns? Because Jews control media & academia and have infected so many white minds with nothing but PC and Pop Culture. 'Celebristianity'(largely shaped by Jews, Afros, and 'gays' or JAG) is the neo-religion of the West.
If Europe keeps producing nonentities like Merkel, Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, Blair, Cameron, May, Berlusconi, and even Farage, it’s finished. Things are getting serious, and it will take real visionaries of wit and grit who can take the shit. As for nationalists, the likes of Le Pen, Geert Wilders, and others won’t do. (The exception may be Viktor Orban.) They are too much part of the system(despite disapproval from the ruling elites) and unable or unwilling for bold action under current rules that are totally rigged by media, academia, and deep state. Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious man. He’s a showman and salesman, and he can’t be counted on to do much that really matters. Also, as long as enough white people are comfortable and satiated with bread & circuses and mentally infected with PC for the time being, it's difficult to shake them out of their doldrums. If Europe is to be saved, it will require the rise of truly remarkable individuals with the power to inspire, lead, and forever alter the trajectory of history.
Extreme times call for powerful personalities.
The threat that Europe faces is the greatest ever. Past wars and repressions were horrible, but WWI and WWII were still about white Europe. So, even after millions died, it was the same white Europe. And as bad as communism was, it didn’t change the demographics in most communist nations. But now, things are direly different. Not only is Europe being colonized physically by foreign masses but European minds have been PC-colonized to ‘welcome’ this as a good thing, even as a 'European' thing.
We need a new set of leaders and rulers who can eradicate the mental virus from European minds and purge them of this ‘guilt’ and ‘fever’. Indeed, the task is daunting because whites welcome mass invasion not only out of ‘white guilt’ but because of ‘afro-fever’, aka jungle fever. European women are turning into sexual deserters who are offering their wombs to millions of African men who are storming the beaches of Europe. As African birthrate is 6 or 7 children per women and since EU has a policy of ‘saving’ millions of self-stranded Negroes in the sea, the demographic and sexual math for Europe is horrible.
White minds are colonized by Jewish PC, white lands are colonized by Third World mobs, white males bodies are brutalized by stronger Negro men, and white females’ wombs are colonized by Negro seeds. It is White Nakba.
In Jewish history, there were two kinds of cleansers: prophets and warriors. Prophets cleansed Jewish minds of the virus of pagan idolatry and reminded them of the Covenant with God. And the warriors took up arms to do battle with enemies of Jews. (The third kind of Jews were diplomats who used wit and cunning to negotiate with rivals, enemies, or overlords of Jews.)
Anyway, unless warriors have vision and conviction, they are mere mercenaries(or Janissaries). In order for white knights to rise, white souls must be cleansed and purged of the PC virus of guilt-and-fever. It’s like Islam has two meanings for ‘Jihad’. One means to do physical combat against infidel, but there is another meaning that says the soul must be cleansed of infidel ideas and images.
In the present, even if great white leaders were to rise, majority of white masses will curse them and denounce them since their minds have been infected with the crazy idea that ‘racism’ is the greatest sin when, in fact, race-ism is a most noble creed and conviction.
Keep in mind that private heresies are irrelevant; nobody cares about private options provided the PC gods are honored in public.
Yep, it's a 'religious' war. It's about 'gods' and heresies.
It all depends on what we mean by 'lie'.
If a rational person says he believes in evolution based on facts, he is speaking scientific truth. But, if he then says that he, as a good Catholic, believes in God, in the Divinity of Jesus, and miracles, would he be lying? After all, there are no facts that support the existence of God or Jesus as the Son of God or miracles. Also, we may ask how a rational person who accepts modern science could also believe in God and religion that have no basis in factual evidence. And yet, we are okay with such a person because we tend to separate Reason and Faith. We tolerate and even honor people who are, at once, rational & scientific AND religious & faith-oriented. It's as if we feel that leading a fact-based life isn't enough; people need some kind of 'spiritual' meaning or purpose in life.
Now, such consideration may not seem to matter in the academia that is supposed to be about reason, logic, science, and study of truth. And yet, every society is 'spiritual' about something. It holds certain narratives, icons, and dogma as sacrosanct. Marxism and Leninism were holy in the Soviet Union despite its official commitment to Scientific Materialism. Marx was god, Lenin was a moses-figure. So, a university head in the USSR would have gotten in hot water if he questioned the wisdom of Marx and Lenin. Then, the same applies in the West. While all these academics claim to be rational, factual, and logical, the fact is they are ideological and 'idological'. They cling to certain Narratives and Dogmas as all-explaining, near-divine or prophetic. And most likely, they grew up worshiping certain icons and idols as sacred and holy-shmoly. In the presence of certain ideas or images, they've been trained to talk in hushed reverent tones.
So, what are some of the sacro-idols & ideologies of the West? Much of it has to do with certain favored groups. Blacks are deemed a holy race. Much of it has to do with 'white guilt' and 'white fever'. Historical guilt over slavery and racial discrimination. But also white 'fever' for Negroes as superior sportsmen, singers, and studs & biatches. So, blacks are prized as both the American moses and the Golden Calf. White attitude toward blacks is both of reverence and revelry. "I worship MLK as saint-matyr... and I wish he would hump my wife." But there is also the element of fear. Because blacks are vocal, loud, aggressive, and demanding, white folks wet their pants in fear of black rage. So, they figure the best way to calm blacks down is to appease them at every turn.
But there is another reason for White Guilt & Fever. Jewish Supremacist Power. Jews are rich and powerful but only 2% of the US population. As such, Jewish Supremacist Power relies on white support. But it is not natural for white goyim to favor Jewish interests over white interests. It is not natural for whites to favor Jewish identity over white identity. But without the support of whites, Jewish Power is like a head without a body. After all, even as Neocons cooked up Wars for Israel, it required white tax payers, white generals, white managers, white bureaucrats, white soldiers, and etc to carry them out. It's like British Power was both awesome and fragile in India. Brits had modern guns and could mow down lots of people. So, they could strike fear into the Hindus. BUT, without the collaboration of the native brown masses, what could a few 100,000 Brits do in India for the long haul? So, the Brits did everything possible to suppress Indian nationalism and persuade the natives that the true glory of India depended on it being the Jewel in the British Crown. To serve British Glory was the duty of good Indians. At some point, Indians said 'bullshi*' and demanded their own identity and interests. And then, the Brits were finished in India.
Jews feel the same way in the US. It was never natural for white goyim and/or Christians to serve Jews who are only 2% of the population. It was even more unnatural for whites to favor Jews over themselves. And now, it is totally unnatural for whites to praise and honor Jews who are the main force behind anti-white vitriol in the US. Jews in NYT are now calling for the polyglotization of the US to replace whites with. Jews look upon whites like Zionists looked upon Palestinians. A people to replace. In Palestine, Jews alone could do it. But in the West, Jews need the globo-numbers of Diversity to replace whites. Of course, Jews don't intend to get rid of whites entirely. Indeed, if all whites were to vanish and if the West were made up only of Jews and non-whites, Jews would be in serious trouble as they can't guilt-bait non-whites(who also happen to be less competent and more dependent). Jews want Diversity to the extent that future whites won't be able to form a solid majority bloc and use populist democracy to challenge and overthrow Jewish Power. Hungarians could choose nationalism and drive out Soros-ism because they are the solid majority. But it's increasingly difficult for the White Party to win elections in the US. Jews figure that Diversity will undermine white electoral power. And PC divides whites into two camps, with both camps sucking up to Jews. In the US, the 'right' vs 'left' among whites amount to progs calling conzos 'nazis' AND conzos calling progs 'anti-semites' because, supposedly, the Democrats are only 100% than 200% for Israel(like GOP cucks are). Jews must be laughing at the white tards. Anyway, as whites lose out to Diversity, Jews figure that one bunch of whites will embrace Diversity as their salvation(from past 'racism') and another bunch of whites(the nationalists) will lose heart and just surrender since their power is lost forever. (Look at the state of conservatives in California. They are like the Palestinian minority in Israel. They figure, "if you can't beat em, join em." They got the Stockholm Syndrome.)
Still, the Jewish strategy is paradoxical. Jews are weakening white power because they rely on white power. If Jewish supremacism relies on white power, it would seem that Jews would want white power to be stronger. After all, it would be stupid for a rider to weaken his horse. Naturally, he wants a fast and strong horse. And yet, he has to destroy the will of the horse. He has to weaken the horse's independent spirit because if the horse is not broken-in-spirit and has horse-pride, it would run off by itself than being a servant-animal to a human rider. Likewise, on the one hand, Jews prize white power like a rider prizes a powerful horse. But Jews fear white pride + white power. Jews want white power without the pride. That way, white power can be manipulated into serving something other than whiteness. White Power + White Guilt means whites will feel a need to redeem themselves. Since whiteness = guilt, whites can only find redemption by serving another people(deemed morally superior to whites). And this is why Jews have pushed the Shoah Cult. Whites have been made to feel like they committed the worst crime of all time against the finest people on Earth, the Jews. But while Jews are accomplished in wit, intellect, and comedy, they don't excite whites in other areas. In contrast, Negroes have loud voices, athleticism, and bouncy booties & bigger dongs, the kind of stuff that can be packaged as entertainment for white folks seeking instant thrills. Also, blacks are the ONLY people who can weaken white male pride. While Jews can bait White Guilt, Jewish guys cannot rob white men of manhood. If the US had no blacks, whites would dominate idols of manhood. But blacks are more muscular and aggressive. And they got bigger dongs. And so, white manhood has been crushed. And that means jungle fever among white women. So, whites are paralyzed not only by white guilt but white cucky-wuckery. Since white males lose their manhood to blacks in sports, song, and sex, they try to regain it by joining the military; and then Jews can use such whites to fight Wars for Israel. John McCain Syndrome. Notice how McCain was a total cucky-wuck when it came to Jews, blacks, and browns. But he was so useful to Jews as a barking dog against Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, Russians(people hated by Jews), and white patriots. Serving as a growling dog of Jewish Power was the ONLY way McCain could regain his manhood.
But, Jewish strategy may lose out in the long run. True, Jews are smart to subvert white pride and manipulate white guilt to make white power serve Jewish supremacism. White Power minus pride and plus guilt will serve something other than whiteness. It will serve what is deemed sacred and redemptive in the West. But when white power is made to lose so much pride & confidence and go into pathetic cucky-wuck mode, might it not be useful any longer to Jewish supremacism? There are signs of this already in the British Labour Party. Whites in the Labour Party are such self-hating whites that they've surrendered to Mass Immigration and Diversity. And that means cucky whites sucking up to Muslims and Africans who feel no sympathy for Jews. British Jews pushed Diversity in the UK to guilt-bait whites, but now, the guilt-infected whites in the Labour Party feel more sympathy for Palestinians than for Jews. They are committed to serving Diversity at any cost, especially to the detriment of whites. But such weakened and self-loathing white power(lessness) becomes not only useless but dangerous to Jews. If indeed Diversity is the highest good, then cucky-wuck 'good' whites must side with 'poor' Muslims against rich Jews(whom are regarded as white by Diversity).
As Jewish supremacists control media and academia, the Holy Three are Jews, blacks, and homos. Diversity is a sacred dogma, but it isn't identity-specific. After all, it is permissible in the West to badmouth Muslims and scare-monger about Yellow Peril. Also, poking fun at Mexicans isn't a cardinal sin either though disapproved. Jews prize blacks above other non-whites because black guys are the only ones who can kick white butt and rob whites of manhood. Also, the bellowing voice of blacks(as with MLK) is more effective in filling whites with 'guilt'. It sounds like god hisself admonishing whites for their 'sinful' ways. In contrast, Jews can't rely on oratory to guilt-bait whites. Woody Allen or Adam Sandler giving a "I have a dream" speech just wouldn't cut it. Also, Jews prize homos because both groups are heavily involved in entertainment and vanity industry that are central to the current decadent West and its culture of narcissism. Also, homo poopchutzpah has the same kind of egotism as Jewish chutzpah. Homos aren't no longer content with tolerance. They demand to be worshiped, and Jews have promoted this side of homo-ness to finally destroy Christianity, a religion they loathe, by having it replaced with Homomania.
So, returning to why universities lie so much. They are controlled by Jewish supremacists who've turned Jew-worship, Afromania, and Homomania as the most sacred neo-religions of America. Religions cannot be questioned. It's a matter of faith. It doesn't matter if the object of faith is true or false. What matters is it's SACRED, therefore unquestionable. Since Jews are holy, we must love Jews and never criticize Jewish Power. We must even shut down free speech as 'hate speech' for its blasphemy against Jewish holiness. And since blacks are the holy race of MLK-as-new-moses and Muhammad-Ali-as-new-hero, we must admire them and believe they got the midas touch. So, any problem arising from blacks must be the fault of some other group... namely white goy! And homos, oh homos, we must worship the homos and drape church after church with 'gay' symbols. Matters of Faith are immune to charges of lies and mendacity. The fact is PC isn't merely ideological or political. It is about hallowing certain ideas into mantras, certain narratives into canon, and certain idols/icons into gods & heroes.
Now, surely there are goy elites in academia who know the truth but play along. It's often about craven careerism, but then, no one wants to regard himself as a coward. So, they rationalize that they really believe in the official lies. But then, when certain lies have been elevated as items of faith, it doesn't matter if it is true or false. All that matters is that it is HOLY, and what is deemed holy is self-justifying and doesn't need to be backed by facts... just like it'd be absurd to insist that a man of faith present evidence for God. Even though the academia is ostensibly secular and rational, it just so happens that human psychology, being what it is, always favors 'faith' over facts. After all, facts are cold and hard whereas faith is warm and fuzzy. Just as people prefer a warm soft bed over a cold hard floor, even secular and rational people are emotionally drawn to the sacral glow over the stark truth.
Also, the flipside of the warm fuzzy sacral glow is the vanity of virtue. It's hard to feel virtuous over facts. Facts determine something as true or false, not as righteous or wicked. In contrast, faith is about feeling not only holy but holier-than-thou. And in order to feel morally supreme over others, there needs to be witches, heretics, blasphemers, and goblins. And according to PC, the greatest 'sins' are 'racism', 'antisemitism', and 'homophobia'. (Sometimes 'misogyny' is included, but this is an off-and-on thing because Jewish-controlled music, movie, and sex industries rely so much on treating women as a bunch of whores and sluts.) In a world without God, the ONLY way that secular people can feel holier-than-thou is to throw fits about the neo-sins of 'racism', 'antisemitism', and 'homophobia', matters which are not to be discussed or critiqued but accepted, worshiped, and obeyed. So, even facts can be denounced as 'racist'(blacks commit lots of crime because they are naturally stronger and more aggressive), 'antisemitic'(Jews have the commanding power in the West due to higher IQ and tribal networking), and 'homophobic'(the reason why AIDS spread like wildfire in the 80s was because of mass orgies of fecal penetration within the fruit community). They are facts but they run counter to the favored holy-shmoly image of blacks as eternal saints, Jews as eternal victims, and homos as perfect angels.
So, to deal with the lies of academia, we must first tackle the fact of how PC turned certain lies into matters of faith, therefore immune to facts and truth.
Ever notice that we are obligated to LIKE Jews. When Jews want to demean someone, they’ll say something like such-and-such person "doesn’t like Jews". This assumes that one MUST LIKE Jews. But why? Why must we like Jews? Can’t we feel indifferent about Jews? After all, many people probably don’t have personal relations with Jews, not least because most Jews are concentrated in big cities. So, they don’t know if Jews are good or Jews are bad, just like they know little about Turks or Bolivians. And surely, there are people who’ve dealt with Jews and came way with generally negative impressions. So, maybe that person has good or valid reasons to dislike Jews. But that is not an option in our culture that is saturated with Philosemitism. We must like Jews, love Jews, adore Jews, admire Jews, praise Jews, and even worship Jews. Even if you know little or nothing about Jews OR even if you’ve experienced situations or relations with the Tribe that were wholly negative, you must LIKE Jews. Now, imagine if you visited Iran or France. Suppose, having spent many years there, you came away with generally negative impressions of those peoples and cultures. Even though you know there is good and bad in everything and everyone, your overall impression isn’t good. Now, who would mind if you felt that way? No one in America is hounded for having negative feelings toward French people or Iranian culture. Some people may visit France or Iran and come back full of praise. Others may never want to return. Now, we don’t attack or demean Americans for having negative impressions about the French or Iranians. But for some reason, such is taboo when it comes to Jews. Even if you had terrible experiences with nasty Jews in NY or LA, you must tell yourself that it is your duty to like and even love Jews. If someone said, following his experiences in Israel or NY, that he has a generally negative view of Jews, he will be blacklisted from so much of society. But if he said such about China or Russia, no one would care. Jewish commentators often pontificate about the character flaws of Russians, Japanese, Muslims, Germans, French, Anglos, Christians, and etc., and attribute these failings to collective/traditional culture or habit. And yet, if someone spoke of the failures of Jewish character and associated them with Jewish history, culture, and habits, he would be called an ‘anti-Semite’, which, at this point, just means "You better not criticize anything Jewish."
There is now the Holy Three we MUST LIKE no matter what. Jews, blacks, and homos. Most people are Conditionals, i.e. we like or dislike them based on how they are like and what they do. We can like them or not like them depending on how they treat us. For example, the US hated the Japanese during World War II but came to rather like them in the post-war era when US and Japan were allies; then, during the 80s, there was much anti-Japanese animus due to trade wars; then, with the rise of China and the close interdependence between the US and Japan, Japan came to be liked again. So, America’s feelings about Japan(and Japanese in general) have always been conditional. In American eyes, Japanese people constitute a nation of Conditionals. They could be friend or foe depending on the situation. In contrast, Unconditionals are like the ‘made’ men in the Mafia. They have a license to do anything as they please because we must UNCONDITIONALLY respect them no matter what they do. And who gets to choose the Unconditionals? Jews. Jews chose themselves and blacks and homos. Among the mafia, if some ordinary hood is killed, it’s no big deal. But if a ‘made’ guy is killed, it is a very big deal, and the killer better have a very good reason(or better be a ‘made’ guy himself) or else he is dead. It’s like the Media never paid any attention when white people were victims of Knockout Games perpetrated by blacks. But when a Jewish man was attacked, it suddenly became news. It’s like the Media generally ignore news about blacks and Muslims killing white Christian folks, but it’s BIG NEWS if Jews are killed, especially by white people. Jews are a ‘made’ people because Jewish Power gets to choose what is what. Jews are Unconditionals, and we must like them even when they spit in our face and kick our teeth in. Indeed, look how much Jews have heaped abuse on Trump, but the Don just praises Jews. If even the US President who is maligned endlessly by Jews must suck up to Jews, just imagine the kind of power that Jews have over America.
That said, let’s play along with Jews as great, wonderful, and noble Unconditionals whom we must praise and admire at every turn. Let’s assume that no people are as intelligent, erudite, perceptive, contemplative, and wise as the Jews are. Jews are the gold standards of humanity, and there are so many things to learn from Jews. After all, Jews Know Best! If Jews are indeed the finest people on Earth, then it only make sense for us to study them, know them, and emulate them. If Jews are great, then whatever they do is great. What Jews do is the summit of human thought and behavior. If Jewish actions and deeds guided by Jewish worldview are indeed the peak of human aspiration and achievement, then it only makes sense for ALL GOYIM to emulate the Jew. If Jews are the best, then what is good for Jews must be good for us. How Jews think should serve as the basis of how we think. How Jews act should be the guide as to how we act. We must become Emu-Semites, or those who Emulate-the-Semites. Or good Imi-Semites, or those who've mastered the art of imitating Jews. To become good Emu-Semites or Imi-Semites, we must carefully study and learn the Jewish Way. We must formulate the Rule-book or Handbook of the Jewish Way that can easily be understood and practiced by most goyim. It will be a blessing to mankind since Jews are the best, the noblest, the wisest, and surely the most wonderful. Indeed, it would be downright ‘antisemitic’ to refuse to learn from the glorious Jews and do as the Jews do. If indeed Jews are the best — so perfect that we must unconditionally LIKE them at all times — , then the only proper course for all of humanity would be to learn from and emulate the Jew. If we must admire Jews because they are good and wise, then it means that the way Jews think and how they act is the gold standard of social philosophy. After all, if you want to be healthy, it makes sense to follow the advice and habits of a healthy person. Likewise, since Jews insist that they know best and act with the utmost wisdom, it is imperative that we study them, learn their ways, and act as they do. We must emulate the Jews. We must be good Emu-Semites. We must imitate the Jews. We must be good Imi-Semites.
So, how do we become good Emu-Semites or Imi-Semites? First, we must understand the Jews, how they feel and think and why. And we must closely observe what they do(as opposed to what they say). And we must try to understand the logic behind why Jews say one thing but do another. Anyway, since Jews are so wise, whatever they do must be inspiring and noble. And in order for us to be wise, upon studying and learning the Jewish Way, we must also think and act in the same way. And then, a whole new era will dawn. The problem with the world is Jews are so wise but we are so worthless. Why? Because Jews act Jewish, but we don’t act Jewish. How can we improve ourselves if we refuse to study and learn from the Noble Jews, the most perfect people on Earth? How can we be truly worthy if we keep failing to understand Jews and master their ways? A student who fails to learn from the master will never be a master. To become a master, one must master the way of the master. And then, one can be worthy of the title of master. Otherwise, he will forever remain a failed student or hopeless case. There is no reason why we can’t master the Way of the Jew, or WOJ. Sure, Jews may be smarter than us, but we are not apes, we are not animals. We are human beings, and that means we have enough brains to learn from the best and elevate ourselves to a higher plane. And since Jews are the highest in wisdom, wealth, and power, all of humanity have most to gain by studying and imitating the Jews. Imagine a world filled with Imi-Semites. A world where all peoples understand the Way of the Jew(or WOJ) and learn to gain wisdom and power. It will herald a revolution in mind and might, and finally mankind can take pride in having achieved their full potential.
So, what is the Way of the Jew or WOJ? Surely, an entire book can be written on this subject, but let’s begin with the basics. To learn the WOJ, we must closely observe Jews and see what they do. And then, we must ask, "Why do they do what they do?" And then, "How do they do what they do?" And then, we must ask, "Why do Jews do one thing but say another?" Once we have pondered those questions and arrived at the formula of the WOJ, we can do as the Jews do. And if Jews attack us for following the WOJ, we can defend ourselves by saying that we are doing only as the Jews do. Should Jews be maligning us for doing as they do? If Jews are so good, wise, and wonderful, it must be because of what they think and do. After all, it would be insane to say Jews are good, wise, and wonderful simply because they are Jewish. People must be judged by what they do, not simply by what they are. So, if Jews are wonderful because of what they DO, then what they DO must be wonderful. Naturally, it follows that we must DO as Jews DO since what they DO is so great. After all, it would be unbecoming for the master to put down a student for learning to do as the master. If it’s wrong for the student to emulate the master, then it must mean the master is doing bad things. If the master is good, then it must be because he does good things. Then, it only makes sense for the student to do as the master does in order to gain respect and prestige as someone worthy of master-hood himself.
As we ponder the WOJ, one obvious lesson to learn is that Jews believe themselves to be special, ‘chosen’, and distinct from other peoples. They have a Covenant mentality with God and/or History. Even as Jews mingled with different races all over the world, they maintained their sense of uniqueness and separateness. This way, they gained materially from dealings with non-Jews all the while working together to strengthen and perpetuate tribal & communal bonds. Without such mentality, Jews would have faded away as a people and culture. They would likely have assimilated into other groups(especially those that were more numerous than Jews). To this day, Jews maintain their sense of specialness. Then, it follows that non-Jewish groups also must develop their own sense of uniqueness, distinctness, and specialness. If it did such wonders for Jews, it will do wonders for any group that develops a covenant mentality. So, unless a people develop their own sense of covenant-ness and specialness, they will eventually lose out in the game of history. For all peoples to achieve greatness, they must be good Imi-Semites and imitate the Way of the Jewish Covenant. Otherwise, one’s people are likely to fade into history like so many Ancient Tribes who were lost in time. Now, if your people develop their own sense of covenant and if Jews revile your people for being ‘racist’ or ‘exclusive’, you just tell the Jews that your people are simply emulating the Jews. If it’s good for Jews, why is it bad for other peoples? Shouldn’t Jews feel flattered that OTHER peoples are imitating Jews because Jews are so great and wonderful?
And yet, maybe we are overlooking a crucial lesson of the WOJ. Maybe what seems like Jewish Hypocrisy is part of Jewish brilliance and awesomeness. After all, the world is filled with competition, and it’s only natural that your side wants to keep the secret to itself. If your side has the Nuclear Bomb, it doesn’t want other sides to have them. Naturally, if all sides got the Bomb, then your side would lose its advantage. So, we can understand why Jews insist on their own Covenant and sense of distinctness while impugning such notions among other groups. So, Jews denounce white identity. Jews mock the Japanese sense of being a unique people. But they are so proud of their own identity and heritage that are guarded with passion. Then, the lesson of WOJ is that, even as we develop, promote, and guard our own identity, heritage, and specialness, we must try to deconstruct, devalue, and destroy such ideas and feelings in other groups, especially those who threaten our well-being and survival. We must subvert the identity of our rivals while safekeeping our own identity. Since Jews are immensely powerful, they are naturally our rivals. So, based on THE RULES FOR IMI-SEMITES, we must do as the Jew. As Jews guard their own identity but subvert ours, we must do the same to Jews. We must guard and preserve our own identity while doing everything to subvert, disgrace, and destroy Jewish Identity. It’s the WOJ. And if Jews denounce us, we can defend ourselves by saying we are just following the WOJ. If the Way of the Jew is to guard his own identity while weakening and destroying others, then we must do the same to the Jews. This isn’t ‘antisemitic’. If anything, it is in respect and awe of Jews. It is Imi-Semitic. It is on the basis that Jews know best. Since Jews-who-know-best guard their own identity while attacking other identities, we must do likewise in admiration that the Jewish Way is the Best Way, indeed the Only Way. Then, it would be ludicrous for Jews to accuse us of ‘antisemitism’ because our actions — guarding our identity while degrading other identities — would be based on the WOJ.
Another brilliant way of the Jew is the use of Diversity-as-weapon. Upon studying the Way of the Jew in the West, it is obvious that Jews use Diversity to divide their rivals into bickering factions. And then, Jews encourage most groups to hate, revile, and blame the group that poses the biggest potential rivalry to Jewish Power. As Jews see it, white gentiles pose the greatest challenge to Jewish Power. Even though most whites aren’t anti-Jewish, Jews take no chances. As long as whites are seen as a POTENTIAL threat to Jewish Power, Jews encourage all non-white groups to pile on Whitey. This way, Jews kill two birds with one stone. They make non-whites weaken white power. Furthermore, by fanning anti-white hatred, Jews create a distraction from their own power that is most dominant in America. If non-whites are made to scapegoat or ‘scapewhite’ White Privilege for all the problems, then most people won’t notice that it’s actually Jews who have the commanding position in America. As Jews are so wise and wonderful, this tactic on their part must be wise and wonderful. Then, it is only natural that we learn this facet of the WOJ and do as the Jews do. We need to use Diversity as a Weapon too. We must encourage non-whites to see Jews as the enemy, the main source of all the problems in the world. We must use divide-and-rule against the Jews. We must tell non-whites that it’s the Jews who have the most wealth, privilege, connections, and exclusive power. We must make all groups feel intense hatred, resentment, and envy in regard to the Jewish community. Now, if Jews accuse us of ‘antisemitism’, it would be most unfair. How can we be ‘antisemitic’ when, out of profound respect for Jewish wisdom and brilliance, we’ve learned their ways and do as they do? If we are ‘antisemitic’ for acting in such manner, then it would mean Jews are also ‘antisemitic’ since they act the same way. If anything, Jews pioneered the use of Diversity as an instrument of divide-and-rule. As it’d be ridiculous to accuse Jews of being antisemitic for acting Jewish, it’d be ridiculous to accuse us of antisemitism for doing as the Jews do.
On the matter of womenfolk, there is much to learn from Jews. Notice that Jews see non-Jewish women as a bunch of ‘shikses’(which means dirty filthy whores). Jews see non-Jewish women as pieces of meat, as mere commodity to be bought and sold. Naturally, such attitude may lead to hostility against Jews, and Jews are well-aware of this. So, Jews have cleverly set about driving a wedge between goy men and goy women. Jews have taken this furthest with the white race. Jews convinced many white women that white men are their biggest enemies. Jews pressure white women to ideologically and politically side with People-of-Color and Jews against the Evil White Male. Jews tell white women to hate their white fathers, white uncles, white cousins, white brothers, white husbands, and white sons. Even when white women marry white men, they feel like they’re living with the enemy because Jewish Power in media and academia told them, "White Males Are Evil". This way, Jews have gained great dominance over the divided white race. With so many white women hating white men, white race is fracked and confused. When we ponder this, it’s obvious that the WOJ is truly brilliant as a stratagem of power. Yes, to reduce a people’s power, you must divide the women from the men. After all, the unity of men and women is the key to any power. It is from such union that there is love and trust within the group. And men and women work together to produce life and raise the kids to be patriots. To weaken such a people so that your people can gain mastery over them, your people must try to divide the men and the women. And that is precisely what Jews have done to the white race. What wisdom! What brilliance! WOJ surely is wise and wonderful. Then, the white race must learn from the WOJ and practice its ways. It must go about doing to Jews what the Jews have done to whites. White race must tell Jewish women that Jewish men are the most hideous, oppressive, nasty, vicious, vile, greedy, arrogant, contemptuous, lecherous, demented, perverted, venomous, and venal creatures on Earth. Jewish women must be made to hate Jewishness as a form of ‘racism’. Jewish women must be encouraged to see Jewish men as the source of all their misery. Jewish women must be made to wail and howl at Jewish Patriarchy(that denied freedom and equality to Jewish women through the ages), Jewish Pornography(that has commoditized so many sisters worldwide), and Jewish misogyny(that sees women as pieces of meat to play with, as the #MeToo movement amply demonstrated). Also, notice how Jewish Power seeks to turn white men into a bunch of cucks. It is a masterful Power Move. After all, a people will weaken IF the women no longer respect the manhood of their men. So, to weaken the white race, Jews encouraged white women to go black and have black babies. The idea is that blacks are tougher and manlier, and therefore, white women must reject wussy white men and have kids with black males. A potent weapon in the arsenal of WOJ. Then, whites must do the same to Jews. Jewish women must be told that Jewish men are a bunch of dorks, gorks, geeks, nerds, and gross pervs. Therefore, Jewish women should be encouraged to mate with non-Jewish men, especially Negroes, Arabs, Muslims, and Iranians. The white race must also denounce Israeli Family policy as ‘racist’ and ‘exclusive’. As we know, Israel has a natal program that encourages Jewish women to have lots of kids with Jewish men. This is sexual ‘racism’, and Jewish women must be enriched by mating with Negroes, Muslims, Arabs, Palestinians, and Iranians. Jewish wombs no longer belong to Jewish men. They exist to take the seeds of other men, especially Arabs. This way, Jewish wombs will be made ‘inclusive’. Now, if Jews accuse whites of trying to commit ‘Jewish Genocide’ via race-mixing the Jewish Race right down to the last Jewish woman, it would be most unjust. After all, it’s just a lesson taken from the WOJ. It is the Jewish Way to weaken and degrade another people, especially one perceived as a Rival Race, by driving a wedge between the men and women and then by encouraging the women to reject the men of their own race and offer their wombs to men of other races. Since Jews do this to whites, it must be GREAT! After all, it’s the Jewish Way,and of course the noble Jews know best. Then, out of respect for Jews and their ways, white power that encourages Jewish women to hate Jewish men, turn themselves into wild sluts, and have sex with non-Jewish men(especially Arabs and Negroes) deserve praise because it is taking a key lesson out of the Jewish Rulebook of Power.
Another WOJ is to associate everything with what-is-good-for-Jews. Since Jews love Israel, Jews in America associate everything with Love-for-Israel. So, to be a good Christian means to support Israel. To be a good Republican means to support Israel. To be a good Democrat means to support Israel. To be a good homo means to support Israel. To be a good Hispanic means to support Israel. Israel, Israel, Israel. Indeed, such propaganda has been so pervasive that most politicians and goyim in the US believe that the highest priority of America and all its institutions must be do what is good for Israel above and beyond what is good for America. So, white politicians better support Israel. Black politicians must support Israel(or else end up like Cynthia McKinney). Politicians of all stripes must support Israel. Politicians of all religions must support Israel. Indeed, every person must put Israeli and Jewish interests before those of his own people. So many people have been led to believe that the first duty of America is to serve Israel. Well, what a tremendous lesson to learn from the WOJ! Then, it only makes sense for whites to do the same. Whites must 24/7 drum home the point that Jews exist to serve whites. Jews must support the white race. Jews must serve the white race. Jews must praise and celebrate the white race. Jews must put white interests above Jewish interests. Jews must be willing to fight and die for Wars for Whites. Jews must give billions and billions toward securing white nations. And if whites have problems with a certain group or nation, Jews must always side with whites(even when whites are wrong). This would only be right because it is out of the Jewish Rulebook. After all, Jewish power has made whites support Jews and Israel at every turn, at all times. Even when Jews do wrong, whites side with Jews. Even when Jews massacre Palestinians, whites side with Jews. So, the Jewish Way is to make goyim obey and serve Jews no matter what Jews do, indeed even when Jews act wicked. Then, the lesson to learn from the Jew is to 'make the Other obey and serve your people'. The Other must be made to see your people as superior and worthier than their own. Therefore, the Other must prioritize your people’s interest over their own. Since Jews are the Other vis-a-vis whites, whites must do everything to make Jews serve whites. After all, if the Jewish Rulebook says "make the Other serve Our Tribe", then whites must make the Jews(as the Other) serve the White Tribe.
WOJ understands the power of speech and the control of media. Cleverly, Jews have come up with the idea of ‘hate speech’ to shut down any speech that is deemed ‘hateful’ by Jews. In practical terms, ‘hate speech’ is any speech that speaks truth to Jewish Power. So, any White Liberationist who dares to say NO to Jewish Power or any Palestinian Autonomist who rebukes Zionist tyranny is deemed a ‘hater’ who spews ‘hate speech’. Once ‘hate speech’ is identified, Jews use all their institutional and financial muscle to have that person destroyed and blacklisted(1,000x more than any Jewish communist who was marginalized during the HUAC-McCarthy years). What an inspired tactic to guard the power and mastery of your own people while discrediting and destroying anyone who dares to speak truth to your people’s power. Via ‘hate speech’ hysteria, Jews have redefined Free Speech so that it’s a privilege only for Jews(and their favored allies) than a universal right for all Americans. Even though the US Constitution guarantees free speech for all, Jews control the law firms, banks, and media that can destroy people and deny them jobs, savings, and the means to spend their money. So, Jews have effectively killed Free Speech in America. Jews are so awesome in their Way of Power. They come up with brilliant masterstrokes to accumulate all the power for themselves, doling out a few favors to their cuck-collaborators. Since Jews know best and come up with the best strategies, we must learn from the Jew and do as the Jews do. In this spirit, we must invoke ‘hate speech’ to denounce and silence Zionism. We must declare that Zionism is a form of supremacism, ‘racism’, imperialism, and genocide. After all, Israel was created through massive ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Jews acted like Nazis with their Lebensraum plan. Jews stole more land in 1967. Jews still occupy West Bank and murder Palestinians. IDF death squads routinely mow down innocent women and children in Gaza. Jews spread Wars for Israel all over the Middle East. Because Jews hate Russia, they spread propaganda that tells us to hate Russia too. So, much of what Jews say is ‘hate speech’. Jews are filled with hate(for Palestinians, Russians, Iranians, Syrians, white Christians, white patriots, and those with the guts to stand up to Homomania) and spew their hatred all over. Then, it is only right that we call out on Jewish ‘hate speech’, denounce it, and ban it. We must work with BDS and any organization to resist Jewish hatred and silence Jewish ‘hate speech’ against goyim. We must say Jewish Power must be gagged because the Jew-run media have spread so much hatred around the world. Jewish Hollywood made all those anti-Arab and anti-Muslim movies where Middle Easterners are usually terrorist and lunatics. As a result, so many white Americans joined the military to kill bushels of Arab men, women, and children. Their minds were infected with the Jewish Hate Virus. And just when the world was sighing with relief over the End of the Cold War, Jews messed it all up with their greed and hatred. They raped the Russian economy, and when Russians said ENOUGH to the Jews, Jews started a Hate Campaign against Russia. And so, there is the ‘new cold war’. And wars in Iraq, Libya, and Syria were all instigated by Zionists. Now, that’s a lot of hate, and we must stand against this hate. So, we must denounce Jewish Hate Speech and work to destroy and blacklist any Jew who espouses Zionist imperialism, ‘racist’ Jewish identity, and Jewish supremacism. We must support Free Speech but not Hate Speech of the Jews. If Jews react by bitching about ‘antisemitism’, it would be most ludicrous. After all, we are only taking a rule from the Jewish Rulebook of Power that says "maximize our free speech while minimizing the speech of our rivals and critics as ‘hate speech’". If such is the Jewish Way, it must be wonderful and sound. Then, it is only fitting that whites emulate and imitate Jews and do to Jews as Jews would do to whites.
And then, there is the matter of Borders. As we all know, Jews are adamant about guarding the borders of Israel. Jews are hellbent on keeping Israel as their own homeland, a place of sacred memory. Jews claim it is theirs, and they feel justified in doing everything to keep every inch of it. They go even further and say all white nations must support the Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish Homeland. But, at the same time, Jews call for Open Borders for Western nations. Why is this? Isn’t it rank hypocrisy? In a way, yes, but in another way, such duplicity should be admired as another lesson to be learned in the WOJ. The Jewish Way is to maximize Jewish Power, and the surest way is to support Nationalism where Jews are the majority and push globalism where Jews are the minority. After all, if non-Jewish nations went into Nationalist Mode, they will prioritize the interests of the non-Jewish majority, and that would undercut Jewish power. So, where Jews are the majority(Israel), Jews are happy with Nationalism that favors Jewish identity and interests. But in nations were Jews are a minority or non-existent, Jews push globalism so that the native majority will become deracinated, cucked, decadent, degenerate, and/or self-loathing. Then, Jewish globo-homo operatives can go to work and take over the key institutions and industries of those nations. Now, that is smart thinking. That is genius itself. Then, it is only right for whites to think likewise. The Jewish Rulebook says "Nationalism & strong borders where Jews are the majority, and Globalism and open borders where Jews are the minority." Then, this rule, as adjusted for whites, would be "Nationalism & strong borders where whites are the majority, and Globalism and open borders where whites are the minority." That means all white majority nations must do everything to secure their borders and stop the mass-immigration-invasion by non-whites. Whites in white-majority nations must safeguard and prioritize white identity, white unity, white territoriality, and white power. But in white-minority nations, whites must do everything to undermine the national identity and borders. And for good practice, whites should begin with Israel. Whites should demand that Jews in Israel reject nationalism and celebrate Diversity. Israel must smash its walls and embrace Open Borders and let tons of non-Jews into Israel. And allow Palestinians the Right of Return. Whites must say it is ‘racist’, ‘xenophobic’, and ‘exclusive’ for Jews to keep Israel as their own homeland. They must be ‘inclusive’ and share the Holy Land with immigrants and migrants from all over the world. Israel must call itself a ‘nation of immigrants’. Now, if Jews were to retort that this is a case of White Hypocrisy that defends national borders for white nations while waging war on Israel’s borders & its right to exist as a Jewish State, that would be most ridiculous. After all, whites would only be taking a page out of the Jewish Rulebook. Since Jews are so wise and wonderful, what Jews think and do must be noble and inspiring. Then, why would it be wrong for whites to be Imi-Semites and do as the Jews do?
Anyway, there are surely many more lessons and instructions to be learned from the WOJ. The more we study the Way of the Jews, the more we will understand the wonderful Jews and their wise and noble ways. Since Jews are such a great and awesome people, surely what they think and do must be the gold standard for all humanity. Then, it is only right that all of humanity, including white folks, must learn from the WOJ and do as the Jews do. It will be the beginning by which Humanity can be cured of its foolishness. Learn from the best. Jews are the best, so learn most from the Jews. And then, do as the Jews do.
DOCTOR ZHIVAGO - News of the Death of the Tsar and His Family
Remember the news of the execution of the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO? The old man(played by Ralph Richardson) wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take such measure. Why kill the deposed man and his entire family? And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that ‘there is no going back’. Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and expected more food and freedom from the Reds. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.
Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Shlomo-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.
Globalism’s power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As the US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism’s aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it. Then, why does globalism seem so omnipotent around the world? One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation and controls world finance, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that comply with the globo-homo program. So, if the US promises sweet deals to nations that cave to homomania, they often do. Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have the best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS(Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.
Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren’t particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma & cliches and repeat them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.
But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that ‘globalism’ has negative connotations. Also, even in the metropole of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn’t good for the world or for most Americans. It’s only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a grand project for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively a European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by ‘New Europeans’ from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as ‘far right’, ‘extreme’, and ‘white supremacist’ by globalism. Betrayal is the New Patriotism. Traitors are hailed as the New Patriots(or 'Patraitors'). Due to globo-shlomo-homo power, betrayal has become the central fact of the Modern World, not as vice but as virtue. What a twisted world we live in. Naturally, in order for Jews to have control over whites, whites must be encouraged to betray their own identity and interests in favor of obeying and serving Jews. The white race has become one Big Rat that squeals on white patriots in the delusion that race-betrayal(especially to appease Jews) is the highest virtue. While Jews practice omerta among themselves, whites have been conditioned to inform on other whites who won't get with the the globo-homo program. Nevertheless, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn’t about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of ‘values’ such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies. Also, it's about all the world groveling at the feet of Jews(and homos).
Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to emigrate to richer white nations. If that option wasn't available, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women(or marry and have kids with white men). For sure, Muslims would have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists, even Zionist ones. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.
Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it’s so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism when it will demographically displace them? Why do so many whites choose to be 'patraitors' than patriots? Why do they think being a traitor is the 'new patriotism'? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they’ve been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating ‘white racism’. They've become addicted to the drug of self-righteous vanity. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed ‘racist’.
Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC’s diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for ‘civic nationalism’ and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed the consensus says Diversity is a wonderful thing, anyone who disagrees is automatically relegated to moral inferiority. Since even the Conservatives have chanted the mantra of ‘diversity is our strength’ over and over, they’ve fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that stem the tide of wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than ‘white racism’. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a ‘far right’ and ‘racist’.
Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests must always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews. Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely on meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity? It’s because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to excessive corruption and abuses, and over time, whites will grow angry and become ‘antisemitic’ once again. The Saxon will learn to hate again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won’t be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can’t resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, ‘antisemitism’ is most likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish Domination.
Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. British Jews are furious that Jeremy Corbyn's base in the Labour Party sides with Palestinians against Zionism. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.
How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. A huge carcass for globo-weasels to feast on. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land mass with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as “Russia’s sphere of influence”. But Russia slipped out of Jewish grasp(just like the Rhine maidens from the clutches of Alberich in DAS RHEINGOLD).
To be sure, it’s still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is, as yet, unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that puts Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn’t apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire. But Russia won’t be having ‘gay pride month’ and ‘black history month’ anytime soon. While Russia isn’t overtly racial in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don’t believe that Russians exist primarily to serve non-Russians, which is in contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies and make profits for Big Pharma run by Jews who peddle opioids to the millions.
In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans… but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst as outsiders also. Most importantly, the die has already been cast to the point where it’s difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it’s now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, you can no longer moderate your position. It becomes a zero-sum game of Win All or Lose All. It’s like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to Operation Barbarossa. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and recognition of the other’s legitimacy. But once Hitler went all in and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast. There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, gently pushing for diversity but also being mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the winds and go whole hog in their War on White or WOW. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.
The Jewish-Supremacist Message to the White Race: "We out-hustled you and used mass-immigration-invasion and Diversity to destroy White Power and Prestige forever." When Jews spit on whites with such contempt, it is truly amazing that so many whites, including conservatives, suck up to Jews.
So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don’t believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It’s all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous model of white national sovereignty. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
Now, why should Jews worry about the rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? After all, even though Jews are a small minority in Russia, they are better-off than all other groups and still control up to 20% of its wealth. So why? It's because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depend on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fears repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who gets too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia feel more vulnerable than the rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish power and its Deep State agents.
But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there’s no telling what he might really do. He’s not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve. Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means America's control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Decreased US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination(in service of the Empire of Judea or EOJ). And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more nation-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.
This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Mass Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive in improving relations. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy. So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It’s about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.
But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as ‘going easy on communism’. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the effort by accusing Reagan of being senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.
It’s like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in Oliver Stone's NIXON.
EHRLICHMAN: Excuse me … Are you talking about recognizing China, Mr. President? That would cost us our strongest support.
NIXON: No … I can do this because I’ve spent my whole career building anti Communist credentials.
HALDEMAN: If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they’d have crucified them, and rightfully so! MITCHELL: It’s damned risky, Mr. President. Why don’t we wait till the second term?
Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and changing the status quo of hostility. As Jewish Power put all the eggs in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews(and homos who value globalism as a missionary vehicle for Homomania). Now, there are times when Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time being against the more challenging Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right characteristics of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance. Today's progs will support any war if the bombs are painted in Homo Colors.
