Two Kinds of People in Current Political Culture: The Easy and the Hard — Jewish Power prefers the Easies because They are Easy to Mold and hates the Hards because They resist Jewish Supremacist Indoctrination and 'Idolatration' — 'Gay' Agenda emerges from the closet as Vanity-Supremacism of Sexual Deviancy as object of worship by 'Neocracy'

If Pope Francis doesn't want to judge, why not join a disco than a church? Religion exists to judge, and Christianity is a judgmental religion. If he doesn't want to judge, he should find a new 'faith' or some hobby. But then, Francis really does love to judge. He loves to judge and condemn traditionalists for refusing to bow down to the latest fashions of degeneracy.

'Gay' Rights Campaign Obtains the Imprimatur of 'Pope' Francis and his 'Magic Circle' - https://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/page11/page11.html

1. It has gone from so-called ‘gay rights’ to Gay Rites, a 'neocracy' of globohomo-mania as new object of reverence, rapture, and worship. It’s been noted by many that the West is becoming irreligious. True, in the sense that traditional faith is waning. But no, in that there's a neo-theocracy or 'neocracy' of satanism with Sodomania and Tranny-scendence as the highest value, along with Magic Negro Cult and Holy Jew Worship. Idolatry is the new religion, and its adherents foam at the mouth in their faddish fanaticism.
For the longest time, the 'gay' agenda was sold as a secular and 'rational' movement in favor of individual rights, i.e. some individuals are homo, and they have rights as individuals to practice homo-fecal-penetration and be what nature made them to be. Then, the 'gay' agenda became the official policy of statism: Government and politicians must either observe, celebrate, and praise homosexuality OR keep their mouths shut if they lack the requisite enthusiasm. But, they must NOT oppose the agenda as it would displease the Jews who control both political parties, big media, and the deep state. Finally, we now see globo-homo nuttery being pushed into houses of worship. It is no longer secular but 'neocratic'. For some reason, churches and temples fling their gates wide open to the worship of satanism. And Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah, and we must all praise the fact that Israel annually(and anally)has one of the biggest 'gay' parades in the world.

2. Jews were the main force behind globo-homo. Anyone who denies this fact is either ignorant or mendacious. It’s been a way for Jews to enforce and reinforce minority-elite-supremacism. As homos are minorities all over the world, any society that puts homos on a pedestal puts minority before majority. Such developments complement Jewish minority-supremacist power. People who bow down before minority-homos are also more likely to be accustomed to bow down before minority-Jews. Also, as homos are alienated from their own societies, they make ideal collaborators of Jewish Globalist Power. Jewish Power coddles and bribes them, and they do the bidding of the Empire of Judea.

Sign says ALL ARE WELCOME but of course decent people who refuse to celebrate Homo-Fecal-Penetration and Tranny-Penis-Cutting are NOT welcome in this neo-satanist church gone rotten.

3. Jews hated Christianity for historical reasons(of 'antisemitism' and having passed the Jewish God to the goyim) and for being a key bastion of conservative values. The church was, at one time, the main force against globo-homo and other forms of decadence, depravity, and degeneracy, often pushed by Jews. Jews figured there are two ways to deal with this problem. Bring down the church and discredit it with salacious scandals, mocking caricatures, and secular arguments. Or change it from the inside. Turn the church into a dispenser of globo-homo, and then there would be no effective force against the ‘gay’ agenda, especially as secular ‘conservatives’ only cater to power and money and will suck up to anyone on top — notice that once rich Jews told GOP to stop opposing globo-homo, ALL Republicans followed suit. Also, a christianity that’s gone globo-homo is spiritually dead. No sane religion celebrates sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting in its houses of worship. The fact that so many people in the West will approve of christianity ONLY IF it embraces the 'gay' agenda is proof that they put sodomy and tranny-vanity over God and Jesus. They don't expect homos and trannies to repent and atone before God and Jesus(and Allah and Muhammad). Instead, they expect Divinity to bow down to the fad-fanaticism of the day. In other words, divinity now exists to flatter the vanity of sexual deviants.

4. Any institution is more about personnel than principles. There is nothing in teachings of Christianity that would celebrate sinners and sodomy. Jesus opened His heart to everyone, even murderers and rapists, but on condition that they sought repentance and redemption. So, all this globo-homo stuff has nothing to do with church doctrine or principles. But, that doesn’t matter as any institution is really controlled by the people inside. If satanists take over the church, it will become satanist. If capitalists take over a communist government, it will practice capitalism. If communists take over a capitalist industry, they will run it along communist lines. If the Supreme Court is taken over by radicals or Jewish supremacists, it will do away with free speech, gun rights, freedom of assembly, and etc. EVEN IF those are guaranteed in the Constitution. People of Power decide, not core principles. So, if catholic church is taken over by globo-homo types, it is effectively 'sodomitic'. It doesn’t matter what church doctrine has said since time immemorial. This is why ‘muh constitution’ types are misguided, indeed clueless. They really believe laws and policies are governed by principles. No, it's the Power that decides. Jews took over US institutions and used their power to shut down BDS, suppress free speech, and promote tribal supremacism of Zion. Such policies don't flow from the Constitution, but Jews enforced them because they got the power. They even passed ‘gay marriage’ through the Supreme Court. Where is that in the Constitution? People of Power or POP can just pull stuff out of the thin air. It’s like Stalin had the power to make a pact with Hitler even though it went against communist principles. In this sense, fascism has a better understanding of how things really work. Power itself is the ‘principle’ of history.

Welcome to Anno Sodomini

5. If the masses were at odds with the elites, then the People of Power or POP would have far more difficulty doing as they please. In other words, even if all the institutions were pro-homo, they would have a hard time pushing ‘gay marriage’ as too many people would be outraged. So, popular will matters. But then, popular will, especially in the age of mass media and public education, is molded by POP or people of power. They decide on the Narratives that young ones grow up with. They churn out pop culture, movies, and TV shows that affect how people feel about topics & issues and, furthermore, decide what kinds of images and idols will colonize their minds. And Jews have control of mass culture and pushed ‘gay’-as-angel iconography to the masses. As most people are sheeple, they fell for it like children fall for Santa. So, Jews got elite power and control mass passion, or 'massion'. It’s like, on the eve of the Cultural Revolution, Mao had both institutional/military power and mass-youth power because young ones were whipped into mania by Maoist propaganda. And Jews got that kind of control. They rule from the top, and they also mold the hearts and minds of the masses. And what have conzos been doing about this all these years? They offered us nothing but “Muh Israel” and “Gay Marriage is now a conservative value.”

Jewish Satanism and Homo Vanity demands that the Christian God and Jesus cater to the narcissism of sexual deviancy.

6. There are two kinds of people. The Easies and the Hards. The Easies are push-overs. Easily molded by public education, advertising, fads & fashion, state propaganda, and political correctness. Most ‘liberals’ today are Easies. They are so easy to influence, so receptive to the latest manias. They are so trusting of elite institutions, so status-conscious, and so into proggy conceits that they fall for anything packaged as ‘new’, 'radical', 'hip', 'cool', and/or pro-'social justice'. So, if the Power says a man can be a ‘she’ or even a ‘they’, the Easies just go along with it without thought. They sure are Easy. As even higher-IQ ‘liberals’ fall for this, Easiness is less a matter of IQ than a matter of self and conviction. Easies have weak individual sense, racial consciousness, and/or awareness of culture/roots. They’ve been uprooted but hardly inculcated with the importance of individuality and critical thinking. A rootless person with strong individuality and critical mindset wouldn’t be so Easy. He may not be conservative, but he won’t fall for every fad and fashion either, especially for approval. But today’s ‘liberals’ have not only been uprooted but denied individuality and criticality. That means they’ve been made Easy to any fad/fashion; however, lacking any sense of individuality, they latch onto the judgmental emotionalism of PC. 'Easy' connotes tolerance, taking-it-easy, and live-and-let-live attitude(the kind seen in the movie DAZED AND CONFUSED), but today's Easies are instantly 'triggered' by whatever that goes against their indoctrination and 'idolatration'(the process of instilling idol-worship). In a way, so-called ‘wokeness’ is paradoxical. Ideologically, it is so flimsy and keeps changing at the drop of a hat. And yet, its minions are puritanically rabid. Now, how can anyone be SO SURE about an 'ideology' or idol-driven-ideology(or 'idology') that is changing all the time, often contradicting itself, and/or going from one outrage to another at breakneck speed? One moment, the all-consuming outrage is over ‘those poor immigrants’. Next moment, the immigrants have all been forgotten and it’s about celebration of ‘gays’. Then, the ‘gays’ are neglected and the new outrage is about the Noble Negroes and 'systemic racism'. Then, it’s about trannies. Then, it’s Me-Too and feminism(even though the 'liberal'-dominated pop culture has pornified womanhood). Then, it’s something else and etc. People who would have scoffed at the notion of Bruce Jenner as a ‘woman’ are suddenly SO SURE that he is one, and YOU BETTER AGREE or else you’re a ‘transphobe’ who must be fired, purged, and blacklisted. So much conviction with so little consistency. How can this be? It’s because PC is essentially amnesiac. It instills people with a righteous sense of outrage but without roots/heritage and/or individuality/criticality. Conservatives argue for roots/heritage, for values with deep historical and spiritual pedigree. Classical liberals and libertarians argue for a strong sense of individuality. PC rejects both and calls for Collective Outrage over the latest ‘injustice'(to be decided by the Power). PC minions are game for this because they have no roots and weak sense of self. They are neither like Patrick Buchanan nor Ayn Rand. Whatever one feels about Buchanan, he has a strong and hard sense of tradition and heritage as a shield against the winds of fashion. Whatever one thinks of Ayn Rand, she believed in the power of the individual to think for himself/herself. She refused to agree with anyone under pressure or merely to seek approval. But lacking such qualities, PC minions have a kind of passion without a core of roots or criticality. It’s a passion of amnesia that easily conforms to the latest fads. PC created a population that is ‘Easy’ but also Queasy. They are Easily molded by the Power but feel so queasy about anything that won’t jibe with the latest fashionable outrage. They are puritans of impurity as the current PC ideology or 'idology' is actually more a mindless idolatry of Jews, homos, and blacks, thus a kind of Tri-Supremacism. It should be obvious to anyone with sense that 'wokeness' is not leftist, egalitarian, or progressive. It is about the supremacism of Jews and whatever Jews prefer uber alles. In a way, Easy-Queasies are like dogs. Notice dogs can be made to bark/bite at ANYTHING by their master. A dog that is gentle with a rabbit can be turned instantly to maul it. Their emotions of servitude to the master overrides all other consideration. Even though most Jews claim to be ‘liberal’, they themselves are not easy-queasy. If anything, they push the Easy-mentality on the goyim because, deep down inside, they themselves are Hard-minded about their own tribal identity and interests. Jewishness is hardcore tribal supremacism wrapped in ‘liberal’ clothing.

The Easy-Queasies hate the Hards. If Easies have soft clay heads molded by the Jewish hand, the Hards are hard-hats who are tougher to crack. Some are hard due to a sense of heritage or tradition. People like Buchanan are true Catholics with a deep sense of church history and values. They won’t cower to the latest fad or outrage. Others are hard for reasons of individual pride. They believe that right-or-wrong and good-vs-bad must be a matter of individual reasoning and conviction. It shouldn’t be decided by popular outrage or political pressure. These individuals may disagree with one another, but each of them is Hard in that he or she trusts himself/herself than pressure from above or below or from their peers.
This is why Jews like the Easies and hate the Hards. Easies are easy to control, whereas the Hards have their own ideas rooted in tradition or individuality.

Of course, there are Hard-Tards as well, such as moronic Creationists or the ‘god hates fags’ crowd who simply won’t believe the science that homos are born that way. Being dogmatic or stubborn for the hell of it isn’t a good way to be Hard. There are also the Hard-Lards, those who seem to be Hard but are actually all talk and no walk. All those ‘right-wing’ talk show hosts sure talk big but usually fold when push comes to shove. Donald Trump is hard-lard. He acts and talks tough but usually caves to every fashion and to the Jews who hate him. ‘Muh Israel’.

WHY JEWS PUSH GAY MARRIAGE - Brother Nathanael

Afro-centric 'Wokeness' is Winning because It is a Proxy of Judeo-centric Supremacism — White Psychology associates Black Domination in Sports, Sex, & Song with Entitlements in Other Fields

The Only Polemicists Left by Steve Sailer

“Why Is Wokeness Winning?” asks veteran pundit Andrew Sullivan, recently fired by New York magazine for distressing its more fragile younger staffers by thinking for himself.

Why is 'wokeness' or PC winning? Because the Power gets to do as it pleases. So, it's the wrong question. A more sensible question is, "Jews won as the ruling elites, so what are they up to lately?" Another sensible question is, "Why don't whites take on Jewish Power as the main nemesis? Why not go for the queen and king? Why go after the pawns on the chessboard?" This BLM woke-wakanda is just a pawn on the chessboard dominated by Jewish Power. Jews won already. And that's why they keep doing stuff like this. So, unless whites address the question of power — which group has it, what is its attitude and agenda —, they won't get anywhere near a solution.

This is primarily about the power of Jewish Identity using black identity to browbeat whites with a combination of loopy ideology and obnoxious idolatry. Who spread this PC nonsense? Academia and media. And who dominate those? It sure ain't Eskimos. Arabs and Muslims may ask a similar question. After so many years of insane US foreign policy, why is 'Neo-Conservatism' still the guiding force. Russians may question also. Why after all the mess the US caused in Russia, Ukraine, and neighboring states, why is the US still in 'cold war' mode? What sense does it make? It makes no sense unless we factor in the role of Jewish Power. As Jews rule the US(and its allies and puppets, which are at least half the world), the policy of the US will be Judeo-Centric. So, what whites face in the US isn't all that different from what Palestinians, Syrians, Iranians, Russians, Hungarians, and many others face around the world. Just like US foreign policy has backed, directly or indirectly, Al-Qaeda and ISIS fighters in Syria & Iraq and backed quasi-nazi elements in Ukraine, US domestic policy supports blacks, diversity, and white cucks against saner and prouder whites. Jewish Power has already used homo power to subvert and desecrate Christianity. As Jewish Power controls the US, both foreign and domestic policy is about Jews pitting one bunch of goyim against others.

Blacks, idiotic or not, don't own the media. They don't command the academia. They do have idolatrous value due to sports and pop music. But as most Americans have short memory and a mentality geared towards fads than heritage/history, relevance is accorded to whatever is hyped most. In other words, if Jewish Power hadn't hyped MLK, Mandela, tropes of American South = Nazism, Emmett Till cult, BLM, and Civil Rights narrative, most Americans wouldn't be as into blackness. Most people don't think or seek out truth on their own. They passively accept whatever is pushed down their throats in school or beamed at them through TV and other electronic gadgets. It's the 'passive passion' of couch-potatoes. Watch all these PC-addled TV shows and become charged with 'woke' outrage. And Jews have virtual monopoly control of those things.
And Jews do this not because they're so crazy about blacks. Jews know blacks are problematic. And most Jews, 'liberal' or otherwise, know all about IQ differences. Most Jews know they are smarter even though they won't admit it publicly. Jews pushed stop-and-frisk in NY for many years. Jews welcomed Bill Clinton as the new kind of Democrat who enacted tough law-and-order policies, all the while placating blacks with photo ops with black secret service men, lending the impression that white bubba loves black bubbas. True, Jews have a certain fascination for blacks as both groups have effectively subverted white America. Both groups have passion for basketball, a game Jews used to dominate when blacks were discriminated against. Jews took musical inspiration from blacks. Jews cashed in big time by controlling sports and music where blacks are prominent. Also, especially following WWII, many Jews sincerely sympathized with people who faced racial discrimination. That said, Jews privately know there are big differences between Jews and blacks. It's all there in the movie UNCUT GEMS. Brainy diamond merchants and monster-athletes & thugs.

Be that as it may, the real source of Jewish Power is control of whites, not blacks. By controlling blacks in sports and pop culture, Jews rake in lots of money. Also, Jews need some controls against black crime because it degrades quality of life. Still, if Jews controlled blacks but not whites, Jewish Power would diminish overnight. Blacks are good at 'cool' and 'badass' things but not most things. It's whites who are good at most things like managing, soldiering, engineering, and all the myriad things that make up civilization. Besides, whites are still the majority in the West. If blacks came to hate Jews but if whites still supported and served Jews, Jewish Power would be intact. But even if all blacks were servile to Jews but if whites gained independent spirit and racial identity/pride and refused to serve Jews, Jewish Power would effectively be over. Jewish Power can survive black hate and white love but not white hate and black love. White subservience to Jewish Power is the real key to Jewish Power and Hegemony.
This is why Jews use blacks to morally browbeat whites. It is to rob whites of pride, confidence, and sense of independence. It is to make whites feel that they owe something to Jews and blacks. If Jews stressed white moral debt to JEWS ONLY, it might come across as too greedy and self-centered. Also, Jews are mainly famous as comedians and they don't command the respect and awe of music stars and athletes, the demigods of our age. That is why Jews need this alliance with blacks. Of course, this is a risky move on the part of Jews. Insulting and humiliating whites can be effective. We certainly see a lot of white cucks and wussies on their knees kissing Jewish toes and washing black feet. But it can also lead to backlash. Whip a horse, and it will usually obey... but there's always the chance that it will get angry and kick the man with whip in the head. When the Saxon begins to hate...

This is why Jews use both sweetness and bitterness to manipulate whites. Jews offer up figures like Oprah and Obama. They promise a new age is dawning where all will be well if whites cozy up to Magic Negroes. Also, chants like 'diversity is our strength' gives the impression that diversity is the greatest gift to whites. More restaurants, more vibrancy, more excitement. It's all to add color and flavor to the white world. And whites are made to feel that black athletes are playing for white fans. So, if the NY team wins, the victory is for ALL New Yorkers, white ones too. And black celebrities are coached to say nice things about white folks once in awhile. To be role models for white kids.
But just in case such isn't enough to fool white folks, there is also the bitterness narrative. Whites have done terrible things in history, especially to holy Jews and magical blacks; therefore, whites are especially guilty and must atone. New generations of white kids must be taught that they are born with 'white privilege' made possible by white oppression and exploitation of Jews, blacks, and others(but mainly Jews and blacks as Jews don't want white remorse for Muslims and Arabs). And this is where PC 'wokeness' enters the discussion. 'Pokeness' for happy smiley feelies, and 'wokeness' for sad frowny faces.

So, this isn't about IQ, crime, or even ideology. Ideology comes with a certain logic, e.g. "if racial discrimination is wrong, then ALL racial discrimination is wrong." There is no inner logic to 'wokeness' except 'anything goes to make whites servile to Jews, morally and emotionally'.
If 'wokeness' is an ideology, it would raise questions not only about 'not enough blacks in ice hockey' but 'not enough whites, browns, yellows, hindus in NBA and NFL'. But the moral outrage is always about 'not enough blacks'. Likewise, 'too many Jews' is never an issue. Even in Hollywood, the issue is couched in terms of 'so-white', not 'so-Jew'. When Jews are not using the Holocaust or 'You are Nazi' card, they use the MLK and Jim Crow card. We know 'wokeness' as ideology is BS because Jews, blacks, and so-called 'progressives' hardly mutter "Palestinian Lives Matter" and, if anything, actively suppress BDS. Palestinians are resisting Zionist apartheid policies, but most Jews are okay with what Israel is up to. And blacks overlook the blatant ethnic oppression and discrimination. And white 'liberals' hail Jews and Israel and say nothing about violation of civil liberties of Palestinians.

So, 'wokeness' is really about idolatry of Jews and blacks. Blacks are crucial because Jews feel that blacks have special juice, voodoo power. In a world where masses are obsessed with sports and rap music has become global, blacks have become 'iconic'. Anatoly Karlin says even Russian TV is filled with blacks. US Wars for Israel have been killing countless Syrians, but no one in Europe cared. But George Floyd dies of drug OD under police custody, and countless people in US, Canada, and Europe go crazy like black jesus was killed. Just like people ignore most deaths(even those of relatives) but get all worked up over celebrity deaths, people ignore the sufferings and plights of most groups and only care for the special groups.
A group can be made special by media hype. Like the romanticism about the 'heroic Kurds'. But some groups have innate special qualities. Jews are especially adept with wit and brain power, blacks are dominant in sports and rhythm. Even though brains beats brawn in actual accumulation of power, brawn has idolatrous advantage over brains. Socrates and Aristotle were great minds, but we remember Ancient Greece through sculptures of muscular heroes. Jews own the NBA teams, but all the attention is fixed on the athletes. China is far away, but black NBA stars are among the biggest idols there. Europeans can't get enough of advertising with blacks. This is why Jews use blacks as the prominent faces and voices of 'wokeness'.
Blackness is also useful because of the wishful associative tendencies of the mind. Certain advantages or forms of superiority make people associate them with all-around superiority. If someone is good at accounting, you don't expect him to be good at everything. It's just a skill, a profession. But when someone is dominant in a 'popular' field, it rouses idolatrous feelings about him. The cultism around him makes people want to believe he is a superior being either capable of superhuman feats or deserving of all the love/money in the world. This isn't rational, but the human mind often works mythically. It's like lions are romanticized as something more than predators. They are seen as 'kings of the jungle', thus deserving to rule over nature. Whites feel this way about blacks due to black success in pop culture and sports, the two biggest obsessions of the modern West. So, whites believe blacks should be great or extra-deserving in everything. It's the 'logic' behind advertising. Any commercial product is created by researchers and manufactured by workers, and yet, a box of cereal, for example, is associated with some athlete who is offered millions. So, the actual people who make the product make less money than the athlete who had NOTHING to do with its creation and manufacture. And yet, people have no problem with this because the athlete is a star, and that means he deserves to have more than anyone else.
But rationally and factually speaking, just because blacks excel at rapping and dunking balls doesn't mean they are good at math, engineering, doctoring, accounting; it doesn't mean they are entitled to or deserving of trophies in every field. Now, people may rationally understand this, but they are usually emotional, sentimental, and 'mythic' than rational and factual. The irrational part of their being feels that the race of Muhammad Ali's, Tupacs, Long-Dong-Silvers, and MLK's(as blacks have booming voices) should have MORE, if not everything. But as it happens, fields such as sports and pop music are about winner-takes-all, and there are just few winners. It's like in pro-boxing, champions make most money, handful of top contenders make some money, and everyone else gets chump change. In basketball, few make it to NBA and all those 'promising' college players end up with nothing(like in HOOP DREAMS). But as white kids in countless numbers grow up time cheering for blacks as their heroes, they feel that blacks deserve more. And this is why it seems so unjust that blacks fail in so many areas. The hero is seen as deserving of adulation and tributes from all sides. Notice even 'socialists' aren't opposed to their famous celebrities and stars becoming ever richer. Now, when it comes to American Indians and brown 'Latinos', whites aren't so sentimental because those groups don't succeed in 'popular' fields; therefore, they don't seem 'heroically' deserving of MORE if not everything.

Jews understand this. They know about the sentimentality that accompanies white awe of black prowess as athletes, rappers, orators, sluts, and studs. Jews know white women try to sing black. They know white boys look to black rappers and athletes as top heroes. Jews know white girls got jungle fever and white boys got cuck worship. And this awe leads to white sentimentality because blacks don't do so well in all professions. In many areas, blacks downright suck. But because of the awe in the 'cool' areas, whites feel sentimental about black failure in other areas. When 'uncool' Mexicans fail in many areas, it's seen as par for the course: "Mexicans suck at 'cool' stuff, so why shouldn't they suck at everything?" But when 'cool' blacks fail in many areas, it's seen as an affront to white mythic adoration of blackness: "Cuz Blacks are so awesome in the coolest fields, it's totally unjust that they fail in many areas." And this sense of injustice and sentimentality leads to 'white guilt'.
Now, Occam's Razor answer to this problem is simple enough: "Blacks are better at muscle-fields but less good at mental-fields." But such is hard to swallow because success in 'popular' fields leads to a kind of cult-worship. Once a people are seen as demigods, it seems wrong to feel they are inferior in anything. It's like the thing with movie stars. Movie stars actually suck at most things but faking it. They are not particularly smart, they aren't all that physical. But they play 'cool' and 'badass' action stars in the movies, and countless audiences want to believe Sean Connery = 007 and Sylvester Stallone = Rocky/Rambo. The actor and his roles dissolve into a singularity. Rationally, anyone knows that the actor and the larger-than-life character he plays are not the same, but emotionally and viscerally, a kind of psychological fusion takes place. And something similar happens with white psychology about blacks. Black domination in 'popular' fields has led whites to fuse black prowess in sports/music with all-around prowess in just about everything. And this is why Jews can exploit white psychology so easily by making whites believe that the ONLY REASON awesome blacks haven't been awesome in all fields is due to the legacy of 'white privilege' and 'systemic racism'. Of course, one wonders why the legacy of 'racism' hasn't prevented blacks from dominating sports and pop music. How is it that natural black athleticism overcame 'racism', but natural black intellectualism cannot? But then, reasoning questions about god will be met with the rage of the rapturous. In this sense, blacks aren't so much the pawns on the chessboard but the bishop. Jewish Power uses blackness as a neo-religion for cucked whites.

Still, Jews are the brains behind it all. If the media and academia were in other hands and fostered more free discussion of facts, public perception and policy can change. So, how does one deal with Jewish Power? There are two ways. One way is to honestly and accurately discuss the truth of Jewish Power in the West with data, statistics, and the like. But should one be entirely objective in a polemical battle?
The other way is to do exactly what the Jews do. If Jews will use any group or any narrative to demean and undermine whiteness, then whites should do likewise to the Jews. Whites should defend, sentimentalize, and hype any group that can be effectively used to expose Jewish abuses, crimes, hypocrisy, and corruption. Whites can bring up the matter of all the Christian peasant folks fleeced by Jewish tax collectors. All the Slavs killed by Jewish communists. Palestinians who lost their homeland to Zionists. All the Arabs and Muslims killed by Wars for Israel. Whites can also use the black card. Jewish slavers were prominent in Brazil. Jewish agents ripped off countless black athletes and entertainers. Of course, Jews anticipate such attacks and invoke 'antisemitism' to smear anyone who dares to go on the counter-attack. In other words, Jews can smear whites, Russians, Iranians, Arabs, and etc. but no one better generalize about Jews. On the white right, a problem has been that many who have denounced Jewish Supremacism also defended white supremacism, making it easy for Jews to smear them as 'nazis', which some of them are. But if whites totally reject supremacism on their own side while attacking the obvious supremacism on the Jewish side, it can be effective, especially as the victims of Jewish supremacist violence have grown exponentially in the 21st century with Wars for Israel.

It's like THE GODFATHER PART 2. Sure, Rosato Brothers made the move on Frank Pantangeli, but who gave the go-ahead? Who gave the go-ahead to blacks to trash the white race? Big Media and Elite Academia are not controlled by blacks. And they aren't controlled by Eskimos. Anyway, UNLESS whites finally admit that Jewish Power is their nemesis and formulates a new political paradigm where whites unite with the likes of Palestinians, they won't have a chance. It's really that simple. When Jews beat whites with the black club but whites refuse to notice the Jewish hand holding the club, it's hopeless. But current reality is worse. Jews beat whites with the black club, but one bunch of whites, the 'liberals', bleat about Russia while another bunch of whites, the 'conservatives', whine about China. And I don't see any light at the end of the tunnel. So, if the white race is over, the future will really be about how non-whites face Jewish Power. But even when whites become minorities in the West, Jewish Power may remain strong because white cucks, 'right' and 'left', will continue to serve Jews for naive sincere reasons or craven cynical ones(as Jews got the money). America in year 2100. Whites are 30% of the population and serve Jews. The great majority of non-whites are too diverse and divided to form a united bloc against Jewish Power at the top that is served by whites. What a future.

SEGREGATION ON STEROIDS by Brother Nathanael

White People Tolerate, Accept, and even Praise Jewish Hatred & Black Violence against Whites because they regard Jews & Blacks as God-Men while regarding themselves as Irredeemable Sinners — Judgement Day Mentality can Doom the White Race

Maggoty White Cuck worships Negro-as-god. He also plays 'new jesus' washing the feet of the 'Wretched'. Thanks, Jews.

It's been said when General Douglas MacArthur was running for the presidency back in the US, Japanese who came to revere him put up a sign, "We play for MacArthur's erection." They got the 'l' and 'r' confused.
In the US, the only politics in town is goyim playing for Jewish Supremacist erections. US politics is just Viagra for the Jewish Pud. Even when Donald Trump, much loathed by Jews, became president, all we got was more 'Muh Israel' and playing for Jewish hard-ons. It's a Portnoic World.

It's beyond Jews as godhead. They are godpud as well. Jewish Power constitutes the god-mind of America. But mind without hysteria and violence can only go so far. So, Jews have groomed 'woke' whites as the furies and black thuggery & Antifa goonery as the fist. But there has to be some sweetness in the mix, and homos play the role of angel-fairies. How often have we seen BLM and globo-homo signs side by side?

Now, given that the Jewish Mind directs 'woke' hysteria and black violence at the white community(and rest of middle America), why does it get away with such foulness? Shouldn't most Americans be furious with the Jewish Mind, white self-loathing hysteria, and black thuggery? After all, if someone spews hatred and threatens/attacks you with violence, you would naturally hate that person and push back. But then, maybe not when the aggressive force comes with the aura of divinity.

It's like the stories in the Bible. God does lots of violence to humanity. He sends plagues, floods, fires, pestilence, and etc. And yet, the Biblical message is not to hate or oppose God but to get on your knees, apologize, beg forgiveness, and seek atonement/redemption before God. As the Bible says God is righteous and true while humans are sinful and bogus, it doesn't matter what horrors God visits upon mankind. God has the right to judge and punish, and humanity deserves to get kicked in the butt. So, God could destroy your community. He could smash your property. He could wipe out your kinfolks. He could whup your ass. But He is right, and You are wrong and deserved all the misfortunes because of your systemic sinfulness. Pagans thought likewise. Aztec gods were fearsome and monstrous. Aztecs believed the gods often acted violently toward people. So, did the Aztecs hate the gods and curse them out? Did they unite to wage war on the gods? No, they groveled before the gods. Gods were super beings, and whatever their motives, they were greater than mankind and could sit in judgement and punish as they wished. Aztecs even offered human sacrifice to the gods.

So, even though it's generally true that people hate whatever force that does them harm, the dynamics plays out differently IF the people (1) believe that the fearsome power is divine or morally superior by some degrees and (2) believe that their own side is especially foul and disgusting. It is why Germans today feel hardly any hatred and rage toward the Allies that smashed their nation and killed millions. Germans, rightly or wrongly, believe that they were so awful, vile, disgusting, scummy, loathsome, and worst-ever that they deserved to be smashed/punished and were, if anything, saved by Allies from their own diseased German souls that led to Wagner and Hitler, even if the 'saving' entailed millions of deaths and raped womenfolk. So, if you were to point out that Allies firebombed Hamburg & Dresden and killed a lot of innocent people, the German response will be, more often than not, "Oh, we deserved it, so thank you, thank you very much for kicking our vile and sinful Germanic butts."

And a similar mentality explains why so many white people in US and EU are supportive of Jewish Power and BLM even after the alliance of Jewish Mind and Black Fist led to so many eruptions of violence that paralyzed entire areas of US and Europe(and parts of Canada as well). Given that Jewish Power called for mass hysteria all across the West and that blacks & self-loathing white Antifa took up the challenge by looting, pillaging, burning, and attacking ordinary people, one would think most people would be totally livid with anger toward Jews and blacks. But as they've been brainwashed and browbeaten by academia, news media, and entertainment(as well as 'acceptable' political discourse), their mentality is neo-biblical. They don't see it as virulent Jews and violent blacks acting like scumbags and destroying peace & stability in the West. They see Jews and blacks as divine forces of historical justice and spiritual sanctity. Jews are the holy Holocaust people, and blacks are the MLK people who are also good at rapping and playing basketball. And in an age when 'twerking' is the most celebrated expression of 'Western Values', it's an added bonus that blacks are very sexual with dongs and buns. Thus, Jewish Mind and the Black Fist are seen as divine. Therefore, their hatred and violence come with spiritual pedigree. It's the violence of righteous judgement.
In contrast, whites have internalized the notion that their race is especially guilty, foul, lowdown, disgusting, putrid, and irredeemably sinful, mainly because it committed wrongs against holy Jews and noble Negroes in the past. (After all, whites need not feel 'white guilt' about what they did to Arabs, Muslims, and Palestinians. Indeed, Muslims matter ONLY AS a immigrant-minority that can be used by Jews against 'white supremacist' nativists in the West.) So, just like Biblical Jews only blamed themselves more when God hurled brimstone and hellfire at them, whites-as-sinners grovel even more when the Jewish Mind and Black Fist concoct another round of Kick-Whitey's-Ass. Or to put it in the pagan context, when the Jewish Mind and Black Fist are angry and do violence, whites offer White Human Sacrifice in the form of more sucking up to Jews, more sucking up to blacks, more purging of whites, more promises of promotions for blacks, more support for Israel, and etc.

It's all satanic because when one group of people worships other groups as godly and divine, it is worship of man-as-god. Jews are not gods. Black feet don't come with divine toes worthy of kissing. Homos are not angels, and true worship isn't celebration of sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting.

But that's where we are in the Sicko West.  THE Z MAN - REACHING THE TIPPING POINT (MYTH20C - EP141) - Myth of the 20th Century

The So-called 'Left' should be called 'Tri-Supremacism', that of Jews, blacks, & homos — Difference between gangster Russia of the 1990s and the US(and West in general) today — Uselessness of the GOP now that Elites can get Material Greed and Moral Vanity in one bundle from Neo-Liberal Democrats

This Coming Leftist Coup Could Backfire—Like 1991 In Soviet Union by WAYNE ALLENSWORTH:

https://vdare.com/articles/this-coming-leftist-coup-could-backfire-like-1991-in-soviet-union

Why call them 'leftist', thereby giving them undeserving credit? The current PC is about Tri-Supremacism, that of Jews, blacks, and homos. No one else matters. Some idiot black criminal, Fentanyl Floyd, died of OD under police custody but became big, big news and we must hail him to high heaven; even Donald Trump was compelled to join the chorus. But all those people attacked and even killed by black mobs didn't count. All those whose properties were destroyed by blacks have been ignored. Blacks have the right to riot, at least when Jewish Power gives the go-ahead. Even though blue cities were attacked by BLM & Antifa mobs and black looters, most white urbanites are still firmly on the 'progressive' side. They feel it's their 'spiritual' duty. Homos are above the law. They spread HIV and caused myriad problems, but we are to weep for them as hapless victims and celebrate sodomy in traditional houses of worship. And June is the crazed 'gay pride' month, with the most powerful industries and institutions all flying the homo flag as the main symbol of 'global values'. All these yrs, what did we see in public spaces but 'gay' flags and BLM signs? (They serve as 'passover' markings for corporations to be spared from the ire of Political Correctness.) And of course, the Jews! The big kahuna of the New globo-homo Order. They get away with everything. They make sure the US favors Zionists over Palestinians and Israel over Iran even though Jews occupy Palestinian lands and Israel has nukes but Iran doesn't. Jews insist on Jewish Supremacism as default US policy but constantly berate whites about 'white supremacism'. Goy whores of both parties deliriously chant "Israel is America's greatest ally" at AIPAC rallies.

The 'woke' order is about supremacism of three groups: Jews, homos, and blacks. White cucks and non-white idiots are told to rally around those three holies. They themselves don't count. If the US is really leftist and cares for the underdog, why is there NOTHING about BDS and Palestinian Lives Matter on the so-called 'left'? There are grassroots elements on left and right that condemn Zionist Supremacism, but their voices never make it to the top. Most Democrats consent to blue states/cities shutting down BDS. Trumpers howl with approval when Trump pledges more support for Israel while dumping on Iran and Palestinians EVEN THOUGH Jews hate white American populists even more than Arabs and Muslims.

So, we need to start by STOP calling the current Western Power 'leftist'.  Stop giving it the credit it doesn't deserve. It should be called 'Tri-Supremacist', and Tri-Supremacism dominates elite discourse and dogma. It will also raise consciousness among most non-white groups that Jews, blacks, and homos are favored over them.

In Russia, the Left actually did its part in bringing down the Yeltsin-Jewish-oligarch system.  The Communist Party opposed the gangster-capitalism and could have won the election in 1996 if not for Zionist-US interference. Later, Russian leftists joined with nationalists against the globalists. 

The problem with the West is there is no real left anymore. The 'left' has been refashioned to celebrate the idolatry of Jews, homos, and blacks, thus Tri-Supremacism. So we should call it 'tri-supremacism' because that's what it is, and then, scales may fall from more eyes. Terminology matters. Call it 'leftist', and it gives the impression that progs are for 'social justice' when they're for idolatry of three supremacist groups. Just ask the Palestinians how much progs care about peace and justice for the underdog. Tulsi Gabbard took an anti-imperialist position, and she was totally ignored. Instead, most progs, under the influence of Jewish-controlled media, actually condemned Trump for trying to pull out of Syria and Afghanistan. They are aligned with the Deep State and military-industrial complex. And they embraced the ridiculous Russia-Collusion hysteria that would have made Joe McCarthy blush.

 The difference between Russia in the 90s and US now is that, even though Jewish oligarchs gained immense power and wealth under Boris Yeltsin, they hadn't as yet transformed popular thought. As such, most Russians still thought in nationalist and socialist terms. Even though communism was bad for Russia, its one silver lining was the suppression of Jewish Capital. Capitalism has been the real instrument of Jewish Power as sky is the limit for gaining profits and privilege. Communism suppressed the rise of capitalist oligarchy. Also, communist nations tended to be more insular and conservative on social matters. And they were fairly patriotic because nationalism, like socialism, stressed unity and the collective over mere individualism. No wonder then that in the 1970s and 80s, the Soviet Communist Party tolerated Russian nationalists more than Russian 'Liberals'(many of whom were Jewish/Zionist) who looked to the West for all the answers. So, even though Jewish oligarchs gained super-power in Russia of the 90s, they had no popular support. Most Russians were in nationalist and socialist mode, and Vladimir Putin exploited this reality to consolidate power to the detriment of Jewish oligarchs. Also, as the economic plan of the 90s was so calamitous in a nation without social safety nets, many Russians faced destitution and turned against the shock doctrine of gangster capitalism and globalist 'liberal democracy', aka puppet government of the Zionist-run West.

But things are different in the West. As Jews have had control of media and academia for a long time, they managed to persuade great many folks that Tri-Supremacism constitutes the highest virtues and values of 'Western Civilization'. Howls of 'racism' means we must worship blacks as moral superiors. Sports and Pop Culture inculcated generations of white people with worship of blacks as idols of cool and badassery. Accusations of 'antisemitism' and endless Holocaust remembrance obligate whites to bless and obey Jews as their highest duty. And 80% of Americans think 'gay marriage' is a good thing. That means a huge number of 'conservatives' also feel that way. So, there is insufficient national-popular will in the West to push back against Jewish Power. Jews had the money and connections in Russia of the 90s but not the control of the Russian Soul. In contrast, Jews have such total control over what now constitutes 'Western Values' or 'American Exceptionalism' that even the American 'right' and populism couch their arguments in terms of 'We love blacks more' or 'We love Jews more'. And 'conservatives' have already come a long way to accept homosexuality and even tranny-craziness as something wonderful. Consider how the 'conservative' judge Gorsuch decided in favor of tranny nonsense. Whether 'left' or 'right', the basic premise in the West is Tri-Supremacism, i.e. "Our side is better because we suck up to Jews, blacks, and homos more than your side does." It's pure idolatry, not ideology. 

Also, unlike bankrupt Russia of the 90s, the US and much of the West have an effective social safety net system. Maybe this won't last forever, but no one in the US starved even during the 2008 financial debacle and bigger mess with Covid hysteria. The problem even now is too much obesity. We've seen how even when the so-called 'left' loses to the so-called 'right' in the West, NOTHING changes. Brexit only led to MORE IMMIGRATION of non-whites and more PC censorship. Under Trump and Republican control of both houses, we only got more tax cuts for Wall Street, more anti-Russian/Iran hysteria, more sucking up to Jews, more sucking up to blacks, and more gay-gay-gay.

Words matter, and calling globalists the 'left' has been utterly damaging by lending the false impression, especially among the naive young, that the Jews, blacks, and homos stand for 'leftism' when they are in supremacist gangster-capitalist mode. And of course, Jews are in militarist mode as they push for more Wars for Israel. And as many blacks serve in the military, they are complicit in neo-imperialist ventures to destroy so many lives. Black generals and soldiers got blood on their hands. But where is the cry of 'Arab Lives Matter', 'Muslim Lives Matter', 'Iranian Lives Matter', 'Syrian Lives Matter', 'Yemenese Lives Matter'? There is only silence because the so-called 'left' is totally bogus. They only care about Jewish power, blacks ego, and homo vanity. Call it Tri-Supremacism. One dead lousy Negro Fentanyl Floyd matters more than millions of Arab/Muslim lives destroyed by Wars for Israel and their proxies.

 Republican Party is useless because Billy Boy Clinton in the 1990s merged Republicanism with Democratism. What animates elite mentality? Material Greed and Moral Vanity. In politics, material greed amounts to the freedom of capital to make more money; and moral vanity amounts to the perception of being on the side of angels, be it spiritual or social or whatever. No wonder that the ruling elites in Western History both hogged the wealth and hoisted the banner of Christ. Material greed and moral vanity. 

In the past, the GOP offered material greed to the elites, whereas the Democratic Party, especially in association with the New Deal and Civil Rights Movement, came to define moral vanity for the elites. So, the elites looked to the GOP for material greed and looked to Democrats for moral vanity. Because of its deep connections to Big Labor and legacy of the Great Depression(which, according to New Deal lore, the Democrats overcame by favoring labor over capital), the Democrats were limited in offering material greed to the elites. So, the elites had no choice but to go to the GOP for material greed, all the while inching ever closer to the Democrats on moral vanity. 

But then, Clinton comes along and severs ties between Democrats and the Working Class. He signs onto 'free trade' and ramps up mass immigration of peon labor. And he deregulates Wall Street and hastens the rise of posh cities. Also, leftism is altered from Mayday to Gayday, which is great for the rich as homos love to cater to the powerful and privileged. 

In other words, the Democrats could now offer both material greed and moral vanity to the elites. So, why would the elites need the GOP anymore? Elites got the bundle of greed and vanity in one package from Democrats. At this point, it's difficult for the GOP to offer even MORE GREED to the elites as the elites have done so well under 'Neo-Liberalism'. Didn't Obama bail out the banks? Aren't Hillary and Biden the darlings of Wall Street? With the Democratic Party, the elites can make super-profits and make symbolic gestures with homo flags and BLM signs.

GOP has a future if it becomes a genuine populist party of the have-lesses, but Trumpism proved that's far from doable. So, it's better to get rid of the party. Its only impact is to divide the white vote along false dichotomies of 'left' and 'right'. US would do better as a one-party system where all Republicans become Democrats and form alliances with saner groups against the elites, especially the Jews. 

THE DAY OF RECKONING HAS ARRIVED BY Black Pigeon Speaks

Why are the Ruling Rich and Radical Mobs on the Same Page? Both are in sync with Jewish Supremacist Power — Wall Street and Street Politics are Calibrated to serve the Empire of Judea — White Identity and White Consciousness lack unity, thus vulnerable to Jewish Manipulation

How phony the progs are? They had a chance to go with a different kind of candidate in 2020, especially with Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard. But not even grassroots Democrats were interested in peace-candidate Gabbard. And it turned out Sanders didn't have much support after all. So, who did they pick? Career insider Joe Biden.
At least there were sufficient elements within the GOP to choose a maverick candidate in Donald Trump in 2016(though he turned out to be a stupid ass). Democrats make such noise about being so 'progressive' and for change, but the best they can come up with are establishment shills like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Obama got away with 'hope and change' thing, but anyone seeing through the hype could tell he was just another shill of the ruling class.

What does it say that both Wall Street and Antifa types are on the same page? How could super-rich capitalists and street radicals have anything in common? It goes to show that both the rich and the radical are controlled by Jews. Both Wall Street and Street Politics exist to serve Jewish Power. Wall Street means financial monopoly for Jews to rake in ever bigger bucks. And the politics of Street Theater is mostly Identity Politics designed to vilify and intimidate any sense of white identity and interests. If there was a true Left in the US, most of street politics would be aimed at the super-rich. There was a hint of that in Occupy Wall Street movement that directed its ire at the 1%, but what with all the globo-homo lunacy, anti-white invective, diversity-mania, and BLM nuttery, the so-called 'left' has mainly been obsessed with smoking out and punching 'nazis', or uppity whites.
Rich Jews would fear the real left because Jews are the richest people in the US. The most privileged and most powerful. True Leftism would direct its energies against the richest and the most powerful. It would wage war on corruption at the top, and we know Jews are very corrupt. True leftism would be threatening to Jewish Power. In the past, many Jews were far from affluent. There were working class Jews and struggling Jews. And uppermost power was held by Christian Wasps. So, back then, there was genuine Jewish Leftism allied with the working class and the like. But why would today's rich ruling elite Jews want to wrestle with true leftism when they are so powerful, privileged, well-connected, corrupt, and 'made'? They benefited so much from globalism and 'free trade' that undermined the bargaining chip of the American Worker. Labor without nationalism is finished as the business class can access cheap labor abroad and import limitless supplies of new ones.
If there was a True Left, Jewish Power and capitalist oligarchs would be genuinely worried. But they happily ally with the existing 'left' because it's mostly bogus. It's not about the people or the workers. It's not about the people vs the elites. It's about BLM symbolism and Antifa nuttery, and both black rage and Antifa dementia are directed mainly at 'white supremacists' who don't even exist as a power. But then, in a culture defined by hysteria and sensationalism, anyone will do as a 'nazi'. So, Trump is 'literally Hitler'(when he's not Putin's Puppet), and anyone with a MAGA hat must be a 'white supremacist'. With a ridiculous 'left' chasing after fantasy KKK, why would Wall Street Jews fear the 'left'? If anything, it only does the bidding of Jews. Wall Street makes Jews richer, and 'leftist' street theater directs radical rage at white goyim.
Jewish Supremacist Power needs white identity/interests to be browbeaten if whites are to snuff their own agency/agenda and cuck to their Jewish masters. Even though Jews are at the very top and work in supremacist mode(not least in foreign policy that has destroyed so many lives in the Middle East and elsewhere), the so-called 'left' doesn't call out on Jewish Power but unwittingly does its bidding. Idiot 'left' hasn't a clue that Jews demean any whiff of white identity as 'white supremacist' in order to make guilt-ridden whites cater to Jewish Supremacism. Idiot 'left' is so dumb that it only associates 'supremacism' with whites even though the most supremacist group in the West is the Jews by far. Notice Chris Wallace never asked Trump to condemn the Jewish Supremacist policies of his administration. Wallace is fine with US favoring Zionists over Palestinians and any other bunch of Arabs or Muslims. Wallace's message is 'no white identity and pride so that whites will serve Jews, the only people deserving of pride and power.' The fact that Jews always cry about 'white supremacism' while whites never mention 'Jewish Supremacism'(and instead pledge to kiss Jewish ass even more) is the main reason for the demise of the white race in the West. It's utterly perverse. Jews, who not only indulge in shameless supremacism but compel whites to lend them support, have the gall to accuse whites of 'supremacism'. It'd be like Nazi Germans condemning Poles of 'Polish Supremacism' for not fully cooperating with Nazi domination of Poland. The fact of Nazi Supremacism made people overlook that Jews too were in supremacist mode. Nazis vs Jews was a case of supremacism vs supremacism, not supremacism vs humanism. (The problem with Alt Right idiots like Richard Spencer is they opposed Jewish Supremacism with their own supremacism than with humanism. Same mistake as with Hitler.)

As for Trump Dementia among 'liberals' and 'leftists', it could be of two varieties. One is the shame of having been out-lefted by a 'Nazi'. According to the agreed-upon script, the Democrats are supposed to make noises about 'social justice' while Republicans are supposed to make noises about 'muh liberty'. Republicans are supposed to be about Big Money and the Military. Even though Democrats are just as much into money and war(if not more so), they are the ones who are supposed to make bleating noises about the 'little guy'. But then, Trump comes along and condemns the War State and blames Wall Street for selling out the US worker. It may have been just a ploy on Trump's part, but it embarrassed the 'left' who went along with Obama's cozy relations with Wall Street and his policy of more wars and destruction. Therefore, one reason for all this dementia about Trump is the repressed shame that the 'left' feels about its own betrayals. Imagine being out-lefted by someone like Trump and his MAGA 'rednecks'. How embarrassing that Trump and his 'white supremacists' are on the side of peace and the American Worker. But at least that kind of dementia owes to some degree of self-awareness even if repressed. It's about the difficulty of facing up to the shame of one's own betrayals.

But the other kind of dementia is just plain dumb. These are 'leftists' who genuinely believe in all the propaganda pushed by Jewish media moguls. They truly swallowed the Russia Collusion BS. They truly believe Trump is 'literally Hitler'. They really believe that MAGA people are KKK and Nazis. When Jews scream 'Nazi', they know they're lying but do it to control the minds of stupid whites, and most whites are stupid(as are most people everywhere). Jews made sure there's a difference between white identity and white consciousness. With Jews, identity and consciousness are one. Jews are proudly conscious of Jewish identity. "I'm Jewish, and that makes me feel wonderful and proud." In contrast, Jewish Power insists that white identity is evil, and ONLY white consciousness is permitted. As white consciousness is separate from white identity, it cannot be about white pride or white interests. It must be about white conscious awareness of all the guilt, shame, atonement, redemption, and obligations that whites must weigh every day of their lives in order to be Good People. This is why the Sailer Strategy cannot be very effective. If most whites were like Jews & blacks and had the unity of identity and consciousness, it could work. But too many whites have white consciousness severed from and at odds with white identity. So, their sense of whiteness isn't about "what is good for whites?" but "what can I do to be a good person?" And as Zionists control media and academia, the Jewish Hand molds white clay minds to be 'woke' and cuck to Jews, blacks, and homos. (Of course, even white 'liberals' and 'leftists' do act in self-interest. They want more money and good things in life. But the success must be only as individuals, never as whites. White consciousness may operate in the mode of "what is good for me?" and "what is good for the holy three of Jews, blacks, and homos?" but never of "What is good for whites?" This is why so many rich and successful whites are anti-white. They succeeded as individuals, but they feel offended by the notion that their success or power has anything to do with white identity or interests. Therefore, Sailer Strategy would be most offensive to their white consciousness.)

Even though Antifa and BLM mobs have done their share of damage to blue cities and posh businesses, the ruling elites don't fear them in the long run. Unlike the Labor Movement that had real legs and shaped American Politics/Economics for generations, BLM and Antifa actions are come-and-go. Blacks riot now and then, but there is no concerted effort to riot all the time. And Antifa will have their fun and then go home to take a shower and watch TV. It's like a hippie happening. Too immature, disorganized, confused, and ridiculous to coalesce into a real movement and power bloc. As such, they mainly have symbolic value. Big Corporations and Deep State wave the BLM banner and support Antifa to direct the politics of rage away from Big Money toward 'racists' and 'rednecks'. If anything, super corporations can claim to be on the side of angels because they fund BLM and bless Antifa. And Jews love it because BLM and Antifa blame 'white supremacism' for everything. They serve to browbeat whites into moral shame and compliance, and white cuckery is most useful to Jewish Supremacism.
It's also an extortion racket. Jews are hinting to white people, "Unless you give us what we want and do as we command, we will keep unleashing violence in the streets and carrying out inquisitions in the work place." If whites had sense and courage, they would call out on the Jews, but they don't. Indeed, even Trump and his MAGA minions are always sucking up to Jews EVEN THOUGH Jews are the main force behind anti-white hysteria. So, if you can't push back against Jews, you must bow down and give them what they want to have any return to modicum of normality.

#KILLSTREAM E. MICHAEL JONES LIVE

New 'Civil War' in America Will be White vs White — Civic Imperialism is Possible but not Civic Nationalism — US was a Race-Nationalist Republic — US Power as Headless Emperor

 https://counter-currents.com/2020/10/yes-we-are-headed-for-violent-civil-war/

Will there be a civil war in America? Of course, this means an intra-white war. There won't be a civil war within the black community. Not one in the brown community. Not one in the Muslim or Asian community. Not in the Jewish community. While there are Liberal Zionists, Neocon Zionists, and some radical Jews, Jews are not into Jew-vs-Jew conflicts. Jews usually circle the wagons. Will there be a war among the various groups? Blacks vs browns vs Jews vs yellows vs Hindus vs Muslims vs etc? The only states where such is remotely possible are California and SW territories, Florida, New York, and few others. They are very diverse, and various groups don't see eye to eye. Still, it's unlikely because most non-whites EXCEPT FOR BLACKS mostly get along, co-exist quietly, or at least tolerate one another. Also, as Jews control media and academia, they've directed most non-white ire and animus toward Bad Whites. Anti-whiteness is the political glue among non-whites. It is the one that nominally maintains the alliance of Jews, white cucks, non-whites, and blacks EVEN THOUGH the group that ALL GROUPS have the most trouble with are blacks by far. But due to mass media manipulation, mass education/indoctrination, and the cult of black cool, there is a tendency among Jews and non-whites to at least symbolically associate themselves with blackness that represents both natural supremacy(in sports, rap, and sexuality) and historical victimization(as slaves and marchers for Civil Rights).

Of course, if all whites were to vanish into the thin air in the US, the main conflict will be among Jews, non-whites, and blacks. Without anti-white animus as the unifying glue, it could be hell for all involved. It's like US and USSR became bitter enemies once Germany and Japan lost out in the game of global hegemony. In a US without whites, Jews and Muslims would be serious rivals, especially as white cucks wouldn't be around as cheerleaders and foot-soldiers of Zionism and Wars for Israel. One thing for sure, Jews aren't going to fight their own battles, and they'll have a hard time persuading non-whites and blacks to side with Jews against Muslims. Also, without whitey to blame, most blacks and non-whites will mainly feel resentful about Jewish wealth, privilege, and power. Without whites to scapegoat as the perennial villains, Jews will have a difficult time in deflecting the rage, resentment, and envy of blacks and non-whites. I suppose Jews can try to scapegoat other groups. Make blacks and non-whites resent Asians as too successful. Or try to set Muslims vs Browns vs Blacks. Or try to forge an alliance with Hindus against Muslims. But it will be a tough sell without whites as the all-purpose bad guys and always-reliable-cucks. 

But whites do exist, and if there is a 'civil war' in the US, it will be a whites vs whites affair. It will mainly be between white priders and white guilters. Between white shucks and white cucks. White Priders will be animated by either overt white pride or refusal to succumb to the cult of 'white guilt'. Even if civic nationalist than ethno-nationalist, they will reject the notion that whites are especially to blame for the wrongs of the world. Also, they will believe that, in the final equation, whites did far more good than bad in world history. 

In contrast, White Guilters will believe that whites are uniquely to blame for what is wrong with the US and the world. Even so, as their minds are molded by Jews, they won't particularly care for most peoples around the world, no matter how much they've been harmed by whites(as foot-soldiers of Jews). After all, most proggy types feel hardly any guilt about or sympathy for Palestinians and other Arabs/Muslims whose lives were utterly destroyed by the US empire under Zionist control. They never utter "Palestinian Lives Matter", "Arab Lives Matter", "Syrian Lives Matter", "Iranian Lives Matter", and etc. They feel nothing for Russians who perished in the gangster capitalist 1990s dominated by Jewish globalists. As their minds are mushy clay toyed with by Jewish Hands, their main passion boils down to 'white conservatives are nazis', 'blacks are so awesome and cool, therefore especially tragic for having suffered', and 'homos & trannies are the angels of new spirituality'. Clearly, the white 'right' is far saner than the white 'left'. Still, what is most tragic is neither side will understand why there is this rift within the white race. Why did so many whites come to hate their own kind, especially in service to Jews and blacks(and really no other people)? And why did they come to believe they are Good Whites on account of celebrating Sodomy while others are Bad Whites because they don't believe Bruce Jenner is a 'woman'? Because people on the white 'right' are relatively less mind-controlled by Jews, they are more independent and balanced than the morons on the white 'left' who are truly pathetic puppets of Jews who control academia and media.

But the problem is 'white 'conservatives' are too stupid and/or ignorant to realize that the main reason for this white-vs-white hatred is Jewish Power. Even as they rant about the 'left', they hardly say anything about Jewish Power that has driven the wedge between white people, dividing them between 'right' and 'left'. That Jewish Power has a hand in both the 'right' and the 'left' is easily proven. Why is it that, even as the 'right' and 'left' berate and insult one another, they go out of their way to prove that they are supportive of Israel and happily servile to Jews? Donald Trump and his minions are supposed to represent populism and the 'right', but there's hardly any talk of white identity/interests but instead endless gibberish about "Muh Israel". In that sense, the white 'right' is only relatively more independent-minded than the white 'left'. Sadly, it is beholden to Jewish Power even as Jews do everything to dump on it. Things are screwier yet. Jews are dominant in American Liberalism, and that means progs and 'leftists' are beholden to Jewish Money. Also, Jews have funded blacks and non-whites as allies against whites. But this also means that, at least on the grassroots level, there are many on the 'left' who sympathize with Palestinians against Zionists. And such numbers seem to be growing. But at the upper echelons of Liberalism, the power is entirely with Jews and their cuck-progs and toadies who grovel at the feet of Zion. Still, even if muted and muffled, the most vocal anti-Zionist voices are found on the American 'left' at the grassroots level. BDS is dominated by grassroots left and totally crushed by Jews. 

In contrast, given the Jewish animus toward the American 'right', one would think most conservatives and the like would be anti-Jewish. But sadly, many on the 'right' are even more supportive of Jews and Israel than those on the grassroots 'left' are. In a sane America, both white 'right' and white 'left' should unite in a 'civil war' against Jewish Power, the real supremacist force in American Politics and foreign policy. But in Crazy America, the Jews, the most insanely tribal and supremacist people, have convinced idiot white 'progs' to revile and attack other white people as 'supremacist' on account of them saying "It's Okay to be White." White 'progs' seem to believe that Jews suppress 'white supremacism' for the sake of equality and social justice. In truth, Jews suppress white identity/interests to make whites cuck to and serve Jewish Supremacism. Are white 'progs' really this retarded? If they are truly about justice and morality, why have they been silent about Wars for Israel under Obama and Hillary as puppets of Jews? For all their yammering about justice for all peoples around the world, their political perspective is so provincially centered on the US Big Media Narrative spun by Jewish oligarchs. They never question the education or information pushed on them; they just mindlessly believe on faith on account of being told that people who adopt such-and-such viewpoints are 'woke' and 'progressive'. But in truth, the current 'left' and 'right' are fluid, both manipulated by those above. Today's 'left' is about globo-homo vanity over working class interests, and today's 'right' is about 'gay marriage is okay but trannies in washroom is not'... but wait a few years and 'trannies in washroom' will be the new 'rightist' value while the 'left' finds some other kooky issue to foam at the mouth over. The 'left' is retarded, but the 'right' is dumb. Haven't white 'rightists' figured out that the Jewish agenda for them is White Nakba? Jews are using Diversity-Inclusion to bring about the Great Replacement of whites by non-whites in Europe, Canada, Australia, and the US. Given such an agenda, when will whites wake up and begin to identify with Palestinians? But these idiot white 'rightists' go on supporting Jewish Supremacism EVEN AS Jews never tire of accusing them of 'white supremacism'. Morons.

Now, there have been elements on the Right that have been critical of Jewish Power, but too many turned out to be Neo-Nazis and Holocaust Denier cranks. Richard Spencer is a prime example. Instead of arguing against Jewish Supremacism and neo-imperialism/globalism, he just wants Anglo-Germanic supremacy to gain dominance and mess up the world in some Nietzschean game of chess. What's the point of opposing one supremacism to push another? What's the point of vilifying Jewish supremacism if one is going to extol Nazi-German supremacism? It's utterly idiotic. 

The American Civil War was not a white-versus-white war, at least not thematically. Sure, it was mostly a war fought among whites, but the driving force behind the conflict was not anti-white animus. It wasn't as if Northern whites were anti-white 'ni**ger-lovers' who decided to kill bushels of Southern whites. The war was over preservation of the Union vs Secession. While some Northern Whites were inspired by abolitionism, most supported the war to preserve the Union. Abraham Lincoln felt the same way. And in the years after the war ended, Northern Whites and Southern Whites came to an understanding, and they saw the need to control the blacks. 

In contrast, many whites today are truly mentally deranged in their anti-white lunacy. But there is no logic or consistency to their worldview. The cult of 'white guilt' is purely selective, usually decided by Jews who push the mental buttons via their control of media and academia. After all, if indeed white progs are surely anti-supremacist, anti-tyranny, and anti-injustice, why were they so silent about or even supportive of Obama-Hillary puppet regime's destruction of Libya and Syria? Why weren't they supportive of efforts on Trump's part to end US entanglement in Syria? Why are they silent about all those dead Iraqis and suffering Iranians as the result of US pro-Zionist policy? Why didn't they march in support of Palestinians in the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms of 1948? 

One thing for sure, the white 'left' is not motivated by true sense of justice but vain opportunism of virtue-signaling. Iraqi lives mattered when Evil Bush II was invading Iraq, but Libyan lives didn't matter when Obama destroyed that country. Progs whine about 'nazis' but were silent about Jews working with quasi-nazi types in Ukraine. They claim to abhor supremacism, but they are okay with US foreign policy favoring Jews/Zionism over Palestinians. They've done nothing about blue cities/states banning BDS. They express outrage over 'sexism' when it comes to Trump but feign ignorance when it comes to Bill Clinton, black athletes, and homo degenerates. There is no rhyme or reason to their moral logic. When illegals were detained under Obama, they were silent. When they are detained under Trump, it's the New Holocaust!!! They didn't care about all the dead Muslims caused by Obama-Hillary's wars(guided by Jewish supremacists), but they suddenly made a big fuss about all those poor-poor Muslims travel-banned by Trump. They talk about history and 'white guilt', but they say almost nothing about American Indians, the most tragic people, the only one that suffered something like genocide in the New World. Even though mass immigration finished off the Indians, progs celebrate mass-immigration. So, what is prog mentality really about? It is just childish parroting of whatever is fed to stupid white minds by Jewish control of media and academia. If Jews say, "Be outraged about this", white progs are outraged about 'this'. Russia Collusion!!! If Jews say, "Be outraged about that", white progs are outraged about 'that'. Black Lives Matter!!! Never mind these urban progs supported stop-and-frisk, mass-immigration, and gentrification that pushed many blacks out of rich cities. The prog mind is all about fashion. It's about flavor of the month. It is the product of political advertising. It is so shallow that it lacks any sense of real history, memory, and moral logic.

But then, the American 'right' is only slightly better. Even as it chooses pride over guilt, it shares basically the same premise as that of the 'left', which is why it keeps losing the debate. The premise is, "Jews are especially wise and wonderful", "blacks are holy and noble", and "the greatest evil in the world is 'racism' and 'white supremacism'." So, the American 'right' agrees with all that but only argues that America isn't so bad because it redeemed itself with progress and wealth-creation. But didn't anyone realize that favoring Jews and blacks uber alles is a form of 'racism'(defined as racial supremacism)? Just ask the Palestinians. And why is it a matter of justice to pay special heed to blacks even when they act like savage apes while ignoring the plight of other groups harmed by blacks? It's one thing to redress historical wrongs but quite another to endow certain groups with the license to cheat, lie, steal, rob, rape, and murder on account of 'muh victimhood'. It'd be like making excuses for American Indians who go from state to state to scalp people and hack them to death on account of 'muh suffering'. 

One thing for sure, the notion of 'civic nationalism' is total bull. There can be 'civic imperialism' but never 'civic nationalism'. Many have a false impression of the US as a 'civic nationalist' republic for most of its history because of the Constitution, but in fact, the US has mostly been a racial-nationalist republic(if not a ethnic one). The facade of 'civic nationalism' was possible ONLY BECAUSE the US was a solidly white majority nation, one that was founded and built by Anglos who then Anglo-ized the Germanics. Later, Anglo-Germanic America compelled all Europeans, from South and East, to assimilate into Anglo-Germanic norms. As most Europeans were racially close, they could blend into this new identity called 'American', which upon closer inspection was really Anglo-Germanic American. That was the essence of American Nationalism. It was race-nationalism. The solid white majority of Anglo-Germanic norms became the spine of American Nationalism. Unlike in Europe where each ethnic group maintained its separateness in their distinct territories, the understanding among various European immigrants to America was they would adopt the Anglo-Germanic norms as the main characteristics of Americanism; that gave them license to move, live, and settle anywhere in America. This was why US didn't end up like Yugoslavia. This Americanism was passed off as 'civic nationalism', but it worked only because most immigrants were white and could blend into Anglo-Germanic America in their willingness to assimilate. And many naturally wanted to assimilate as they readily realized that Anglos and Germans had created a superior order of productivity, relative liberty, and opportunity in the New World. 

Would 'civic nationalism' have worked in the US if most immigrants from the beginning were from Africa, Asia, Middle East, brown parts of Latin America, and etc? No, it would have been much more difficult for non-whites with strikingly different cultural backgrounds to assimilate into Anglo-Germanic America. Even after all these centuries, the color lines remain notable in Latin America even though Latin American nations officially make big noises about civic nationalism and people not seeing color. US worked as a race-nationalist republic. All this talk of 'muh constitution' misses the point. Latin America had constitutions nearly identical to that of the US, but things turned out differently because the racial demographics and dynamics were different. Indeed, Canada didn't rebel against the King, and Australia started out as a depressing penal colony, and yet, isn't it odd that US, Canada, and Australia turned out more alike in many respects than with democracies in Latin America inspired by American Independence?

Now, 'civic imperialism', though problematic, is a possibility, as it was in the era of the Roman Empire. With no racial, ethnic, and/or spiritual core to unite all the people, Roman citizenship was a matter of the law and loyalty to the state. And Civic Imperialism seems to be the general direction of the globalist enterprise with the US as metropole. But unlike the Roman Empire where the Romans ruled, any people can come to the US and climb up the ladder to elite status. And whites, whose ancestors founded and built this country, are not only supposed to tolerate and accept this transformation but welcome and celebrate it as 'progress' based on 'inclusion' and 'diversity'. 

But then, this model in some ways resembles the Roman Empire in that the ruling elites will not be chosen purely on meritocratic or ideological basis. There will be meritocracy in that smarter ones will rise higher, and there will be ideology at work in that 'diversity' and 'inclusion' will mandate the promotion of blacks and browns with lesser credentials. But at the very top will be Jewish Power that shall go unchallenged. Jews have the most money, control key institutions and mass media, dominate popular entertainment(that shapes so many minds), and etc. Also, Jews know that MOST PEOPLE are apathetic and disengaged. So, all they have to do is buy off the 'elites' of various communities. It doesn't matter if most blacks aren't keen on Jews. As long as Jews control the black 'leaders', black politics won't stand in the way of Zionism and Jewish Supremacism. Same with 'Latinos' and Asians. Even Muslims, especially those from nations like Pakistan who feel little affinity for Arabs. Still, to the extent that all peoples are allowed to emigrate to the US and climb up the elite ladder, the globo-homo US empire will be more like Byzantium where the leadership was far more varied than in the Western Empire. 

While Civic Imperialism is doable, it's extremely expensive. Unlike Civic Nationalism that can exist on a humble level, Civic Imperialism requires tremendous power and expenditure. Empire is about over-reaching. It is about power at the epic level. It's like the mega Hollywood Epic must spend lots of money and make lots of money. There is no other way. Nationalist loyalty isn't based on super-power or super-wealth. A person could be living in a middling nation or even a poor nation. But he may still have a deep sense of nationalism and loyalty to country and folks for reasons of tradition, sentimentality, and sense of roots. It doesn't require much for nationalism to operate. Rich nation or poor nation, nationalism is possible. Strong nation or weak nation, nationalism comes naturally. 

But empire means stretching power over vast distances and diverse peoples, many of whom have little in common. Empire demands that these diverse peoples pledge allegiance to ANOTHER power that would play the role of center-of-the-universe. But the ONLY way to persuade various peoples to obey a foreign power is through the combination of big sticks and big carrots, both of which are extremely expensive. The various peoples must be threatened with force and/or bought with bribes. They must be made willing partners or unwilling partners. It is the ONLY way an empire can be maintained. It requires extra-exertion of power and wealth. 

For those in the metropole, it is both exhausting and exhilarating. The empire must always scramble for more lands and peoples to control. It's a 24/7 enterprise of more wars, more markets, more peoples, more agendas. And yet, those in the metropole feel the power and importance. They become addicted, just like the Romans did. And even though the peoples of other nations who become subjects to this neo-imperial power feel resentment, they also long to be a part of it. And as long as mass immigration is allowed, they would rather take part in the empire than resist it, especially as immigration to the US means a better material life. Also, PC gives the impression to non-whites that they are on the rise, on the cusp of taking power. Even as they are submitting to and taking part in the empire, they feel that they are serving 'social justice' because they are rising at the expense of whites who are being diminished demographically, politically, and economically. 

Thus, if old Western Imperialism was about white rule over non-whites, the American neo-imperialist globalism is about maintaining an empire that facilitates the takeover of the West by the Non-West. At the twilight of the Age of Empires following World War II, the Non-West took up National Liberation against Western Imperialism. Today, the idea is that the Non-West should take part in the Neo-Imperialist Enterprise, a kind of mutual imperialism where the West and Non-West invade one another and merge into one. 

Or so it seems. Because behind all this is Jewish Power that is determined to remain at the very top. No matter who rises and falls in the elite hierarchy, they are to serve the Jews and support Zion. And why? Jews got the money and power; they get to play thumbs up or thumbs down as to who joins the elite ranks and who doesn't. Jews know that whites are too castrated and cucked to disobey the Jews. But Jews are taking no chances. They sniffed pitchfork populism in the candidacy of Donald Trump and intend to crush it for good. As for non-whites, Jews know that the diverse bunch can never come together to take on Jewish Power. Jews can play divide-and-rule among the various groups forever. 

Can this Civic Imperialist enterprise succeed? It may for some time because the US is so vast, rich in resources, & plentiful in food, and have so much talent. Past empires had an Achilles Heel in the size ratio. The imperial center was far smaller and poorer in natural resources than the imperial possessions. Thus, more stick had to be used as there wasn't enough carrots to go around to bribe the subjects. But the US is an empire unto itself, especially with Alaska in tow. It has vast riches all on its own and generates excess food, fuel, and resources. It has a big stick but also lots of carrots to go around. So, unlike the Italian peninsula, Spain/Portugal, Britain, Holland, and France, it is better able to meet the demands of expenditure necessary to maintain the empire. (It also has Dollar Supremacy.)

Still, there are so many contradictions in the American Way. How long can Jewish Power remain hidden? Also, as long as it remains hidden, it's hard to tell who is ruling America? If Jews, the top power in America, won't declare themselves the ruling elites, who is the captain of the ship? White people? But white people have been so discredited morally, racially, and historically that this isn't workable. Notice that white political candidates NEVER talk about white interests and instead try to justify their careers on what they've done for Jews, homos, and non-whites, especially blacks. Are blacks in charge? The problem is blacks are too much in victim-complaint mode to take over as ruling elites. The mode of black politics isn't "We have the broadness of vision and magnanimity to rule" but "blackity-blackness". Their focus is too narrow to represent all of America. Black political mindset isn't about "what is good for all Americans" but "what all Americans owe us blackity-blackity blacks." So, we have a strange situation. America is the most powerful nation on Earth, but it looks like a headless emperor. Jews are really the head of America but won't show it. If the white head shows up, it is egged on as 'white privilege' or 'white supremacism'. If the black head appears as the godhead of Americanism, all it says is "We da victim, gimme gimme gimme", which isn't exactly dignified or 'presidential'. Obama did seem to introduce a new kind of black politics at a higher level, but he turned out to be a worthless puppet of Jewish Power and then ended up torching America with another round of black rage politics. It's hard to tell the future under such circumstances. 

TOO MUCH DEMOCRACY by Brother Nathanael