Notes on the Saker's "The Empire Takes a Knee. Let It. But We Don't Have to!" — Problems of Blacks Gone Wild or BGW — Idolatry > Ideology — Even if You Ignore the Reality of Race, It will NOT Ignore You

https://www.unz.com/tsaker/the-empire-takes-a-knee-let-it-but-we-dont-have-to-2/

to the immense number of lynchings

Simply not true. Far fewer blacks were lynched than people were killed in a single major pogrom in Russia/Ukraine. From the end of the Civil War to the 1960s, a few thousand blacks were lynched and mostly for ghastly crimes. In any given year in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 30s, countless innocents were executed for NOTHING. The evil of lynchings plays a prominent role in the US moral narrative only because Americans have an overly idealistic view of their historical project. But lynchings have been common in all places and all times. It was often the primary way of justice in societies without strict enforcement of Rule of Law. Lynchings are and always have been commonplace in Africa. You can find all sorts of videos of blacks being lynched for stealing stuff in places like Nigeria and the Congo. Blacks know that nasty violence is the ONLY thing that blacks understand. Honor killings are common in the Middle East, Caucasus, and other parts of the world, and they can be as brutal as lynchings. And what was the American Indian form of justice? They tortured people to death in the most horrific ways. They made their victims sit on anthills and burned them to death.
Now, none of this justifies the use of lynchings as means of justice. There should be courts and trials and all that. But much of US history was frontier history, and vigilantes sometimes took law into their own hands. Tragically, this led to innocents being killed or the guilty being killed in especially cruel ways. (But when we consider the fate of James Fields of Charlottesville notoriety, has American justice really improved? Talk about a kangaroo court. And what kind of a sane justice system allows 'gay marriage' while harassing bakeries to bankruptcy and ruin? And why aren't the war criminals and butchers of the US and Zion tried and executed like Saddam Hussein?) And in the South, whites resorted to lynching blacks because they knew blacks are tougher, stronger, and more aggressive. Whites felt that blacks needed a clear message that there will be serious repercussions for raping or murdering whites. Rough justice has been common in hard times. Take China. Big nation with lots of poor people. To keep the order, the government has been ruthless with crime. Executions by bullet to the back of the head have been common in China. In Philippines, the drug problem got so bad that Duterte promised to use death squads on drug gangs.

And while those who point out that there have been many race riots in the past are correct, they are fundamentally missing the key fact that the current 'race riots' are not 'just' race riots... The best proof of this... is that they have not only spread across the US... also spread to Europe and in Asia and Oceania... So what is going on here? ...we have to admit that what triggered this worldwide rash of protests is... second-hand exposure to a very specific narrative spread... by the legacy corporate ziomedia. I call this narrative 'Black is Beautiful'.

And this complicates matters. Outwardly, it would appear that good peoples of all colors and stripes around the world are standing up to the Evil Empire and calling out against American hegemony. They are resisting jingoistic White Supremacism! After all, they've been fed the Narrative that the US is controlled by White Privilege. For those who rely on the globalist Jewish Media, the Alt Right descended on Charlottesville and murdered innocent people. In truth, the US today isn't what it once was. Yes, the US was once ruled by what could be called 'white supremacists' by today's standards. (But give credit where it's due. The ONLY reason why people around the world want to come to America is because 'white supremacists' in the past conquered North America, imposed their will, and created a new order of industry, modernity, and rule of law. Who'd want to come to the US if it were still run by American Indians shooting arrows at bison or fleeing from Grizzlies? Or, who would want to come to the US if whites had allowed it to become like Peru or Venezuela, a mixed race hell-hole with whites as minority?) For some time now, the US has been controlled by Jewish Supremacists. But unlike the 'white supremacists' of yesteryear who said, 'We got the power', Jewish Supremacists are more like, "Yes, we have no bananas." It's like the fat Jewish guy in WOLF OF WALL STREET saying "It's not like that" to the question of whether he's married to his first cousin but then goes on to describe exactly that.



Woody Allen made a movie called BANANAS about a Banana Republic, but the US has turned into Yes-We-Have-No-Bananas-Republic.



Jews got the supreme power in the Empire, but they prop up the myth of White Supremacism. And that means so many dupes and minions around the world think Resistance amounts to railing against white supremacism as represented by the likes of Chauvin the cop when, if anything, those working-class cops(some of whom are indeed rent-a-thugs) are mere attack dogs of blue city urban elites(dominated by Jews and homos) who trained the police to be tough on crime, especially black crime, not least by learning a thing or two from Israeli handling of the Palestinian situation.

So, we have a surreal situation where even the so-called displays of defiance and resistance against the Empire are really just extensions of the Empire's agenda. When so many idiots wave the globo-homo flag and indulge in Negrolatry as forms of resistance against Americanism, it's downright hilarious because the two main agendas of Jewish-run US empire is Anno Sodomini and Jungle Fever/Jungle Faith. If these 'anti-imperialists' were for real, they would have mobbed US embassies as retaliation for the economic rape of Russia, sanctions against Iran, Wars for Israel, tyranny over Palestinians, and etc. Instead, most of these people conceive of resistance against American Evil in terms of 'Orange Man Bad', Kiss the 'Gay' Butt, and Suck the Black Dic*, which are exactly what Jewish Power promotes via its media control, academic dominance, Hollywood, music industry, and pornification of culture. In a way, you gotta give Jews credit where it's due. They pulled off a brilliant trick on the dimwit goyim. They gained supreme power over the US empire and use American Power for nefarious Zionist-supremacist interests, BUT they managed to fool both proglodytes and the 'good peoples' of the world that US is ruled by the likes of evil 'racist' Chauvin while saintly Jews are on the side of the Resistance and 'Anti-Racism'. I mean the Anglo and Soviet imperialists were never this good in fooling the masses. They didn't fool half the world with their official tripe.

Still, Jews are playing with fire because Jewish Power depends on the prestige and legitimacy of American Power. By making Donald Trump look so bad and by spreading the image of the US as a hell-scape of police brutality and 'genocide' against blacks, the very justification with which the US enforces its will around the world is being called into question. If indeed the US is such a horrible place where white 'racist' cops routinely murder innocent and angelic black men, what right does the US have to serve as the Policeman of the World? Maybe someone will connect the dots and say US-Israel has its knee on the neck of Palestinians. (On the other hand, the Jewish moral preening about George Floyd has effectively given cover to Israel's current process of annexing West Bank. Jews feign sympathy for Floyd while IDF's knee is crushing West Bank to oblivion.) So, even though worldwide protests are going according to the Jewish globalist plan, it's not win-win for Jews as they are sullying the reputation of the US on the world stage, which plays to the advantage of Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, and the like that can exploit the current crisis as moral ammo against Big Bad US. After all, if even leaders and elites of the US must take the knee and grovel before the mob, maybe the US isn't such an 'exceptional' and 'indispensable' nation but a vile and vicious one. Still, the global protests are mostly not spontaneous but have been orchestrated by NGO's around the world that take money and orders from Jews. If Hillary were in the Oval Office, I highly doubt if the mass media and NGO's would have spread the hysteria so far and wide and fanned the flames of violence.

The pernicious 'Black if Beautiful' ideological dogma.
Black is beautiful began in the US in the 1960 and it has since become an integral part of the western doxa, an ideological dogma which cannot be challenged without immediately resulting in an accusation of 'racism'. Simultaneously, another ideological dogma was developed, the one which claims that 'all races are equal', but without ever really defining the terms 'race' or the term “equal”.

I disagree. Black Is Beautiful or BIB isn't pernicious, and its origins were justifiable and understandable. Also, it wasn't supremacist but egalitarian or perhaps nationalist. It wasn't saying blacks are MORE beautiful than other races. It was saying blacks should regard themselves as beautiful in their own way. Thus, it could be understood as egalitarian: all races are beautiful in unique ways, and this is no less true of blacks. Or it could be justified as a form of nationalism: blacks should prize and preserve blackness like other races prize and preserve what is special about themselves. 'White Is Beautiful' was deemed unnecessary because whiteness was the standard for beauty in movies, magazines, advertising, modeling, beauty pageants, and just about everything. 'White Is Beautiful' would have been redundant or overkill, like 'Sun Is Hot'. In contrast, 'Black Is Beautiful' was deemed necessary because blacks had been made to feel inferior for so long. Blacks themselves preferred light-skinned ones to dark ones. Black men and women used chemicals to straighten their hair. Blacks lost their original Sub-Saharan identities. Kunte Kintes were made into a bunch of Tobies. Cucumonga and Ugabuguga became Tyrone Smith and Leroy Jackson. For all its inaccuracies, the TV show ROOTS was a pretty decent dramatization of the Black Is Beautiful agenda. The stress was on the need for black identity, black pride, black memory, and black nobility. And a lot of soul music from the 60s and 70s could properly be called beautiful, like Marvin Gaye's album WHAT'S GOING ON, Lou Rawls' "You'll Never Find", and Chi-Lites' "Oh Girl".

But BIB went out of favor, and blacks got shameless in what could be called Black-Be-Ugly-Mugly-Badass-Crazy-Trashy-Savage-Wild-And-Shi*-And-Damn-Proud-of-the-Tomfoolery. This has especially been the case with the rise of Rap Culture when black youths took over the culture from black adults. While black communities were falling apart in the 60s and 70s, one saving grace was that black pop culture, especially in music, was controlled by adults than by kids. So, while white rock got stupid with ugly punk and demented heavy metal, black music was classier and more adult in emotions. But then, rap culture happened, and blackness got defined by young street punks of da Hood. They wore baggy pants, used 'ni**er', 'mothafuc*a', and 'bitchass ho' as primary lyrics and wallowed in wanton shameless vulgarity. Take a song like the 70s classic "Me and Mrs. Jones". It's racy but also stylish, subtle, and mature. But if a rapper had written it, it would have went, "Jones you bitchass ho, come suck muh dic*."

BIB was a rejection of the "Credit to One's Race"(or COR) mentality that had once defined the respectable black bourgeoisie. COR was premised on black inferiority, i.e. blacks had to show that they could be as good as whites. Whites were high, blacks were low, and blacks had to make a special effort that they were worthy of respect and the same rights as those held by whites. BIB called for an independence of black identity and spirit. Still, it had one thing in common with COR in that it emphasized the need for black dignity and pride based on nobility of spirit. In other words, it had standards. It kept with the motto, "A mind is a terrible thing to waste" of the Negro College Fund.

But the Black-Be-Ugly-Mugly-Badass-Crazy-Trashy-Savage-Wild-And-Shi*-And-Damn-Proud-of-the-Tomfoolery mentality, or to put it more simply, the 'Blacks Gone Wild'(or BGW) mentality had no use for standards of any kind. Instead of 'a mind is a terrible thing to waste', the attitude became 'mind is a great thing to get WASTED'. Rollo-ism won out over Lamont-ism. In an episode of SANFORD AND SON, Lamont is worried about marijuana growing on his property. In contrast, Rollo just wants to smoke it.



Whatever one may say about BGW culture, it's not beautiful. It's not dignified. Granted, look closely at any people and culture, and they're pretty corrupt. MLK was really Fartin' Poother Bling. Sam Cooke who sang some wonderful songs and whose "Change Is Gonna Come" became an anthem of the times died running naked after a woman. She shot him. LBJ was a slime-ball. GOP, the family values party, has been a den of homos and degenerates. Mormons are really hypocritical Mammonites.
Still, civilization is about the effort and the struggle to favor the noble over the ignoble. Given humans are really hairless apes, they sure aren't angels. Still, they don't have to be shameless demons either. But black culture, given the innate savagery of black nature and with egging on by nasty Jews, became brazenly ugly, trashy, and demented to the max. The music turned filthy and obscene. And black dance went from bumping-and-grinding to 'twerking'. This surely isn't a continuation of BIB but a break from it. BIB favored the Afro and rejected blacks imitating whiteness, but BGW is all about the 'weave'. BIB favored black men sticking with black women in the name of racial solidarity and appreciation of black females, but BWG is all about "We ni**az now be masters over fa**oty ass white boys who cuck at our feet while white biatches suc* our dic*s". BIB was assertive but not supremacist. It was about changing black self-image, not about making the world see blacks as superior. BWG is vulgar supremacism that says, because blacks are kings of NBA, rap & holler, invent dances like 'twerking', worship theyselves, and got bigger dongs, they should be worshiped and emulated by the whole world. It's supremacism based mostly on things that used to be disdained by civilization.
Why do Jews promote it? Jews control black bodies like they control globo-homo. Jews figure they will serve as the minds of globalism while blacks will serve as the body and homos will serve as the fingers. Jews got the wit and vision. Blacks got the prowess. Homos or Tinkerbells got the style and flair. All three groups went from self-assertion to supremacism. Jews once insisted on a fair shake in the Western Order and an end to 'antisemitism'. Blacks demanded an end to 'white racism', and homos said they wanted the freedom to be 'gay'. But, the three groups couldn't be content with equality for long because they realized they have certain notable advantages. Jews, as the smarter people, got richer and more powerful and figured they have the right to rule over dimwit goyim. Blacks, as they gained prominence in sports, went from insistence on racial equality to looking upon whites as 'fa**oty ass white boys who should serve da black master'. And just like white G.I.'s in postwar Japan came to despise Japanese men when Japanese women became willing whores of American military men, black men began to despise white men with the rise of Jungle Fever and cuckery. As for homos, their advantages in design & creativity and concentration in elite fields put them in contact with lots of rich and powerful people. As such, their attitude became neo-aristocratic. As homos love to cater to the rich and powerful, they became the favorite darlings of the Jewish Elites.

But then, to understand these changes of consciousness, we need to consider HBD and the reality of race and group differences. The change in attitudes among Jews, blacks, and homos owes to genetics. After all, would Jews have moved into supremacist mode if their average IQ were 100 or 90? Would blacks have gone from BIB to BWG if their genetics didn't favor them in sports, funky music, and fighting? Imagine if most blacks were like Emmanuel Lewis or Gary Coleman. Would homos have become nasty and haughty pricks if they didn't possess an edge in design, aesthetics, and style? Suppose whites were smarter than Jews, stronger than blacks, and more arts/culture obsessed than homos. The Empire would essentially be white supremacist even if the official ideology were egalitarian. Ideology is shaped by the factors of quality and quantity. Jewish communists were committed to egalitarian principles, but their quality of talent led to Jewish-domination in the early period of the USSR. Later, Soviet Union became more Russian-dominated due to the demographic-quantity advantage of white Russians. In quality, Jews were better than Russians, but in quantity, there were more Russians who gradually wore down Jewish power.

Because far from promoting real 'equality' the modern liberal ideology really preaches Black superiority – a special status for Blacks which cannot be symmetrically granted to White (or any other) people.

Actually, the official ideology preaches equality and 'race is just a social construct'. What is behind the cult of black superiority is Liberal IDOLATRY. One may even argue that idolatry colors the ideology, turning it into 'idology'. Same was true in communist nations. By ideology, all were equal, even the leaders. But the idolatry or the cult of personality of Stalin(or later Mao, Castro, Kim Il Sung, etc.) meant that idol > ideal. Most people, even smart ones, are slaves to emotions and sensations. The Stalin cult was intoxicating to the millions who came to worship him as a god. So, it didn't matter that communist ideology said everyone was equal. Emotionally and viscerally, many in the USSR revered Stalin as a demi-god. Ideologically, so-called Liberals may believe all lives are equally precious, but why do they favor Jewish lives over Arab ones? Jewish lives have been idolized by the cult of Anne Frank and other famous Jews. Arab lives are faceless. Again, idol > ideal. What Jews learned from advertising and electronic propaganda is that idols often trump ideals. Jews came to realize that Christianity had one tremendous advantage over Judaism and Islam. Whereas Judaism and Islam forbade idolatry, Christianity(especially Catholicism and Orthodox) employed it as propagandist tools of the Faith. (One reason why Protestantism has fared worse in the electronic era could be due to its drabber nature.) So, secular Jews were mindful to take over the power of idolatry. Therefore, Hollywood became the new vatican of globalist idol-worship. And all nations have been impacted by Negrolatry and Globo-Homo as just about every TV show and movie now must feature holy homo or jungle fever/faith. And of course, there is the obligatory Holocaust movie every year, not only from Hollywood but European nations.

Now, why have Jews chosen blacks and homos as the main idols? It's because both groups have natural advantages that are especially appealing in our age of vulgarity and licentiousness. Homos are shameless in their vanity, narcissism, and hedonism. They are naturally exhibitionist. Just like aristocrats loved to wear fancy things and strut around at dance parties, homos love to take over streets and show off their high heels and act whoopsy-doopsy. Buns-and-Funs is the new bread-and-circuses. While the Jew-Homo alliance wasn't inevitable — Jewish culture was traditionally the most anti-homo in history, and there was a time when Jewish Leftists tagged Hitler as a fruit — , the two groups have common biases and interests. Both have seen Christianity and traditional morality(of goyim and straights) as obstacles to their liberty and/or power. Both are minorities in almost all societies but with special talents. Both are heavily represented in arts, letters, and creative areas. Both tend to be more shameless than other groups. The Jewish reaction to Russians saying NO to globo-homo gave the game away. LGBTQ nonsense is proxy-power of Jews. Jews supported lesbians and homos to destroy Christianity by befouling churches with 'gay' colors that celebrate homo fecal-penetration and tranny-penis-cutting. In a way, homos should be anti-Jewish. After all, the pagan cultures that were most tolerant of homos were the ones condemned most by traditional Jews. The anti-homo position of Christianity has its roots in Judaism. St. Paul denounced the homosexuality of the Greeks.
But times change, and Jews have gone from traditional faith in God to a kind of neo-Satanism where they are into self-worship and care only about Power. In some ways, homos today are a weird bunch. They are usually associated with the 'left' and 'diversity' and 'equality', but homos are nothing if not elitist. Homos, with their obsession with aesthetics, are closer to Nazi beauty cultists. Homo nature isn't in sync with egalitarianism or humanism. Homos want the very best. They are into caviar and fancy jewelry. This is, of course, why the corporate capitalist elites hired homos to transform 'leftism' from class struggle ideology to ass-hustle idolatry. Indeed, consider the ways of Andrew Sullivan and Milo. Why are both into getting bung-donged by Negroes? Because they see black men as superior studs, and so their white bungs must take black dongs. Indeed, the fact that Milo is Jewish, homo, and into Jungle-Bungle-Fever makes him a perfect representative of the current supremacy. Then, why was he attacked by the Establishment? Because he spelled it all out. The Power promotes supremacist Idolatry(that Milo so colorfully represents) but still maintains the smokescreen of egalitarian ideology. After all, if like Milo, the Power spilled the beans on what is really up, its message to the world would be, "Jews should rule over dimwit goyim cuz they're smarter, homos should lord over you lame straights cuz they're more creative, and blacks should be worshiped by inferior non-blacks cuz they got more muscle and bigger dongs." And then, peoples all over the world would have to think about the contradictions between supremacist idolatry and egalitarian ideology of globalism, and the scales would soon fall off their eyes. Why would the Power want that? The Power knows it's more effective to push equality ideologically while celebrating supremacism 'idolatrically'. Stalinism did the same thing. Soviet ideology said Stalin was a humble servant of the people. As such, he was no better than any Soviet citizen... ideologically, that is. He was a good communist. But in terms of idolatry, he was superman, he was god, he was the sun. Assure everyone ideologically but intoxicate them 'idolatrically'. Ideologically, we are told Jews and Arabs are equal in worth. But in terms of idolatry, it's always about Israel, Israel, Israel, Holocaust, Holocaust, Holocaust, Anne Frank, Anne Frank, Anne Frank. Idolatry gives Jews a face while leaving Arabs faceless.

Indeed, one reason why the US used to be 'white supremacist' even when its ideology sincerely strove to be 'egalitarian' was because whites were the main idols in advertising, movies, and etc. For much of Hollywood history, even non-white parts went to whites, e.g. Marlon Brando as an Okinawan in TEA HOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON. And in Latin America, despite all the egalitarian ideological sermonizing, the idolatry is usually 'white supremacist', what with mostly white actors and stars hogging the TV shows, movies, and advertising. Part of the reason is white control of media there, but it could also be there's something about white aesthetics that has greater appeal the world over. In India, the 'Aryan'-looking types with lighter skin are usually favored in movies and advertising. Japanese culture is dominated by anime and manga where most characters are caricatures of whiteness idealized. South Korea has become plastic surgery capital of the world, and many dye their hair blonde. And blacks, despite all their yapping about black identity, go for hair-straightening or wigs. Black men prefer white women, and one reason why blacks welcome race-mixing is they want to appropriate more white looks for the black race. And Jewish men have long preferred blonde 'shikses'.

In the past, the ideology had no problem with white idolatry as the West was mostly white and proud of it. The problem today is whiteness is much denounced by the Narrative — "White Privilege is the product of whites having had it too good by exploiting and oppressing others(even though, in truth, widespread white affluence only became a reality AFTER World War II)" — but still remains the most desirable traits in the world. For example, despite the rise of Jungle Fever and black male idolatry, white males are still most sought after. (Affluent women of all races who seek sperm donors usually go for Nordic men.) And despite the success of black women in pop music, white women still top the charts in female desirability. Even non-whites who bitch about the white race all the time often seek out white mates. So, some black guy who is howling about evil whiteness could have a white ho or wife. A nasty yellow bitch spewing filth at whites could have a white boyfriend. Or a Latino who poses as a person-of-color and rails against the Gringo could actually be as ivory as any European. Furthermore, when we look at immigration patterns, the movement of countless feet indicates only one thing: Non-whites prefer to live as minorities in white worlds than as majorities in their own. So, they are closet-white-supremacists who prefer whiteness over their own kind, and so, their anti-whiteness is paradoxically a therapeutic exercise to conceal their slavish pro-whiteness. They are ashamed to admit they prefer whitey over their own kind. It's the same with Jews. They carry on and on about how 'whites suck, whites are bad, whiteness is evil, and etc', but if they really feel that way, why don't they all emigrate to non-white nations and live in harmony with wonderful non-whites? Whiteness in so many areas is most desired but also most derided. Indeed, it is most derided because those who desire it most are shamed to admit it. It's about time whites sang the Fleetwood Mac song to non-whites: "You Can Go Your Own Way". But of course, they don't want to because non-whites know they never had it so good as under or with whites. Sure, whites did lots of bad things around the world, but the reason why even savages in Africa have cell phones is due to whites. The only reason why China and India are now modern nations with airplanes and electronic communication is because of the West. And where would Jews be if they'd never moved to white nations?

Those who have read me in the past know that I don’t even accept the notion of “race” which, in my opinion, is wholly non-scientific.

That's insane. While the theory of race is problematic as the definition varies widely(and has yet to develop a scientific meaning), who can deny the existence of general human groups? Europeans and Asians evolved separately, and there are noticeable differences in appearance and temperament. Even among blacks in Africa, we can tell general differences among Somalis, Bushmen, and Nigerian Bantus. The peoples of the Americas may have originated in Asia, but over time, developed into separate 'races'. Scientifically, we can define race to mean 'subspecies', but unfortunately, 'race' is often used to mean just about anything. It is sometimes used as 'species', as in 'human race'. Sometimes, different nationalities are called races. Race isn't an exact category because subspecies can mate with one another. Whites and blacks can mate and produce mulattoes. Does that mean whites and blacks don't exist as races? But mulattoes are possible only because different races exist. You can't create a mulatto by mating a Swede with a Swede or by mating a Nigerian with a Nigerian. Likewise, Mestizo is the product of white mating with browns. Polar bears and brown bears can mate and produce fertile offspring. So, should we not consider polar bears and brown bears as different races of bears? Though they are categorized as different species of bears, they are really different subspecies because they can mate and produce fertile offspring. This is also true of wolves, dogs, and coyotes.

Racial differences are real and deeply impact the world. Chinese are rising in power because their racial characteristics allow for education, industry, and development. It's not just geography but geo-genetics. Different geographies and conditions led to different genetics. Why do Jews control the West? Ashkenazi Jews have higher IQ due to cultural selection that favored scholar and merchant genes. Why do blacks now dominate sports in France and UK, and what are the ramifications of white worship of black idols in athletics and music? It's Jungle Fever/Jungle Faith. Why do Jews own NFL teams while blacks play in them? Why did Simon Mol, one Negro, spread HIV around so many Polish women? How did one Negro Mol nearly turned Poland into Moland? Because races are different, and Negroes got bigger dongs that turn on white ho's. If Russia let in tons of blacks, blacks would soon take over Russian sports, and Russian boys and girls would be like white boys and girls in the US, UK, and France who now worship black idols. RACE IS REAL.
Even among white groups, we can tell general differences due to genetic separation. Though Russians are white, why are they more likely to have Sluggo-heads than other white groups? Genetics. Look at the heads of Vladimir Putin, Fedor Emelianenko, and Yuri Gagarin. Though not only Russians have Sluggo-heads, more of them do than even other Slavs like the Poles. Why did Jews dominate the Russian economy in the 90s? They are smarter and savvier. What will happen if Russians take in lots of blacks? Blacks will become the idols of Russia, and Russians will become Russcucks. It's the truth.

The Empire is universally hated, and not just for its (very real) racism.
This would all be rather harmless and even comical if it weren’t for the 'other side of the ideological coin': the AngloZionist Empire has totally and comprehensively lost any kind of moral or political authority, both in the US and in the EU (as well as in the 5 Eyes nations and other US colonies like Germany or Japan).

But has it? Aren't you contradicting yourself? If the new religion of the Anglo-Zionist West is Negro-Worship, then George-Floyd riots all around the empire would seem to be validations of Imperial Authority. If the ruling elites of the US, the Donald included, honor the Tragic Magic Negro and IF all those subjects of vassal states do LIKEWISE, it suggests the US empire remains the trend-setter for minions all over the world. In a way, what we are seeing is akin to Roman Empire going from pagan rule to Christian rule. Romans used to be pagan and oppressive toward Christians. But when the Roman elites knelt before Jesus as the King of Kings, the new narrative/message was spread far and wide throughout the empire, and everyone had to bow down to the Messiah(who'd once been derided as a dead Jew on a stick). US power was once about Anglo-American prestige and Christian missionary might. But Jews took over and made themselves, blacks, and homos the new holy trinity. And it seems the US is very effective in disseminating this new official state religion. So, when all those in vassal states go into hysterics over the Magic Negro, they are really just bowing down to the Anglo-Zionist Empire. Of course, some sovereign nations — like China, Iran, and Venezuela — are cynically fanning the crisis, but that's not the case in nations like UK, Japan, Germany, France, and etc. If the ruling elites in China and Iran are merely exploiting the crisis to their advantage, the masses of brainwashed minions in vassal states are pouring into the streets in mindless worship of the Tragic-Magic Negro as the new christ. Thus, their supposed Resistance is just Obeisance to the Empire and its Deep State that is hellbent on totally destroying white America and Trump.

Btw, Zio-Angluck(or Anglo-Cuck) is a more accurate characterization of the US empire than 'Anglo-Zionist' because, while Jews constantly demonize 'white supremacism'(and even mere white identity, as in "It's Okay to be White"), whites and Wasps are always sucking up to Jewish identity, Jewish heritage, Zionism, and Israeli hegemonism. When blacks accuse whites of 'white supremacism', Jews cheer them on, and so do the white cucks in the GOP. But when blacks make a fuss about Jewish Power, white cucks are the first ones to bark at blacks. White dogs get riled up at blacks ONLY WHEN black dawgs bark at the Jewish Master. When lack dawgs attack white dogs, the Jewish Master rewards the former with doggy biscuits, but when black dawgs yap at the Jewish Master, white dogs are the first to come to the defense of the Jewish Master. Anglos are now Anglucks. Pathetic.

In the past, the AngloZionist Empire was just as evil as it is today, but at least it had the means to provide a high degree of material welfare to its citizens, but now that the Empire is falling apart and in a major economic crisis, more and more people are turning their rage against their own government or, maybe even more accurately, against the obscenely wealthy ruling classes which have a total control of the US and/or EU political scene.

Not so. Blacks are rioting for free video games and gym shoes. Antifa are just degenerates who like to smash things, even when times are good. Blacks have been acting blackity-black forever, and most white protesters are not acting like Antifa. They are mostly cucks who just love to virtue-signal. There is NOTHING genuinely moral about their sanctimony. If they are truly moral, why were they silent about all those working class folks killed by opioids? Or all those innocents killed by Wars of Israel under Obama? For many of them, it's just another opportunistic political rally against Trump.

Also, due to dollar supremacy, high-tech dominance, tons of natural resources, and best farmlands in the world, Americans will never starve. Unlike past empires that were threatened with loss of empire, the US can lose all its imperial holdings around the world and still have a good life just by living off the fat of the American land.

Remember how George Orwell wrote in his masterpiece 1984 "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever"? I believe that a lot of people, Black and White, felt something similar when they saw the appalling footage of the slow murder of George Floyd by a gang of clearly stupid White cops.

This makes little sense. After all, those who make the biggest fuss about George Floyd are on the side of the Deep State, more repression, more censorship, more suppression of freedom, more Political Correctness, more witch-hunts. They were the ones who were FOR Covid-lockdowns and attacking those who called BS on the mass panic. Blacks, Antifa, and globalists are not for more freedom. They want the state to pull a coup on Trump, take guns away from whites, deny financial services to people they disagree with, shut down free speech(as 'hate speech'), and force globo-homo propaganda up everyone's bung. They are the red guards of Zio-Angluck capitalism. These are the same people who denounced Trump for daring to pull troops out of Syria. They didn't shed a tear for all the dead in Libya. They are for the BOOT. They want the BOOT to be on the face of whites forever. Steven Spielberg began LINCOLN with a black man's foot on the face of a dead white soldier. That is the message of these progs who cheer on Antifa that actually does the bidding of the Power.

Here's a foot on someone's face. Does anyone care? No. People care about George Floyd because a Negro turns magic when killed by a white cop.

Coming to a neighborhood near you when they defund the police. pic.twitter.com/kmRTVxudop

— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) June 10, 2020

The Empire is taking a knee.
This is not unlike what happened to the Soviet Union in the late 1980s when basically the entire ruling elite felt that it had lost any will to stand up against the opposition and when it became trendy to bash everything Soviet (much of which very much deserved such bashing, but not everything!). That state of affairs led to, first, the collapse of the soviet society Soviet Union in 1991 and, second, the collapse of the Russian society in 1993.

The Empire is taking a knee to whom? No, the empire is trying to knee Trump's balls by making him out to be the 'racist' bad guy, thus making blacks stick with the Democratic Party. Also, the Jewish elites, by pretending to care about George Floyd, are trying to cover up the fact that Jews led the way in tougher policing and gentrification to make cities safer from black crime. And they are getting away with this BS. The Deep State and Zionists aren't taking the knee to anyone. They are just pulling a Color Revolution against Trump. They are just indulging and manipulating the childish black mind. The really goofy thing is Trump himself is a puppet of Zion, but Jews will not tolerate a 99% puppet. They demand a 100% one. The worldwide unrest is being used by Jews and globalists to push the Narrative, "Good peoples all protest Evil Trump and the white 'racists' who support him." And so many people, even Trump, are cucking to this Narrative.

The comparison with the fall of the USSR doesn't make much sense. After all, the problem of the USSR wasn't merely political. It was EVERYTHING. The store shelves were empty or stocked with inferior goods. People came to rely on the black market for essentials. The entire system was in turmoil and disarray, especially as Gorbachev's reforms only made things worse by localizing the economy without proper incentive structures. Under Gorby, Soviet people found out that half-hearted communism is worse than full communism, and they had yet to figure out a way to transition to a market economy with property rights backed by rule of law.
In contrast, the US has no problems with production. If anything, the current problem around the world is glut. Too much of everything. For all the talk of poverty, obesity among the poor is a bigger problem than hunger. There would have been no riots if the store shelves were empty. Negroes looted cuz there were lots to steal... and it's only a matter of time before the shelves will be filled with goods again. So, any comparison with the USSR is dubious.

The problem with the US is the crisis of authority. Jews got the power but won't admit it. Whites cuck to Jews, and one of the Jewish Demands is that the myth of 'white supremacy' be perpetuated. Jews need the myth to (1) hide their dominant power and (2) to keep whites paralyzed with shame & guilt, therefore subservient to Jews(and their allies). But this arrangement is close to surreal. Even though Jews got supremacist control over whites in reality, whites who cuck to Jews like pathetic dogs must pretend they got white privilege built on white supremacism that must be expunged from American politics and society. Whites must play the roles of both 'white supremacists' and hapless toadies to Jews. The problem is further complicated by Negrolatry that says blacks got the most moral authority due to American History(never mind the American Indians) and therefore deserve to rule as the children of MLK, BUT they seem unable to. The real reason for the black lag is, of course, that too many blacks aren't high enough in IQ or apply themselves to schoolwork, but the official reason is always 'white supremacism', even though whites spiritually cuck at the altar of Jungle Faith and grovel at the feet of Jewish Supremacists.

For all the financial problems, the US economy still produces more than enough food. The global economy fills American shelves with all sorts of stuff, cheaper than ever due to low labor costs in China, India, Mexico, and world over. However, there is a crisis of authority and accountability because so many people are clueless about who has the real power and what is really going on. Consider. There was three yrs of totally nonsensical Russia Collusion Hoax, but so many people, from deep state elites to cat ladies watching Rachel Maddow, either pushed it or swallowed it. When Obama was the puppet monkey of the Jews, whole bunch of conservatives worried that he might be a 'Stealth Muslim'. Right, a 'stealth muslim' who pushed 'gay marriage' and waged more Wars for Israel. At the very least, the people of the Soviet Union knew who were in charge during communist rule. Today, too many people have no idea who is in control. It's certainly not the Orange Man who got just about nothing done except to shovel more money at Wall Street. The official narrative says Blacks are so wonderful and should rule, but most prominent blacks are either puppets, tokens, or symbols. So much is said of the specter of 'white supremacy' haunting every facet of American Society, but whites in deep state and elite institutions are worthless cucks who do as Jews order them to. If white supremacy really did rule America, people would at least know who's in control. But despite all the talk of 'white supremacy', all we see is white cuckery. Maybe the homos are in control, but homos are nothing without Jewish Power. Jews are, of course, in control, but they use their power to hide their power. With such political Houdinism, there is bound to be a crisis of authority in the US. And in Europe as well. Even though European nations seem led by European leaders, they are all vassals of the US empire that is the property of the Empire of Judea. If white Americans are cucks, Europeans are double-cucks who must cuck to white Americans who cuck to Jews. But since the Narrative says that whites suck while blacks are holy, all these white cuck elites make a big show of 'checking white privilege' while extolling the virtues of blacks who, as yet, haven't shown the proficiency to rule or govern anything. So, the power game in the West is like the scene in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST where no one wants to come out and take the blame for the ruckus.

So what can decent people do next?
Well, for one thing we don’t have to chose between White and Black racism. In fact, the only logical (and moral) stance today is to reject any and all forms of racism, very much including the Hollywood-promoted anti-White (and, I would add, anti-family, anti-male and anti-Christian) and pro-Black racism.

What people need to do is choose nationalism over globalism. They need to choose rational race-ism and reject radical racism. If you're white, you should have white racial consciousness while respecting other races and their identities. The real and realistic choice is not between 'racism' and no-racism but between radical/supremacist racism and sane/rational race-ism. First of all, whites must reject the term 'racism'. So much confusion owes to the misuse of the term. If people understand 'race-ism' to mean belief in the reality of race and racial differences, scales will fall from their eyes. For instance, there is so much talk about how so many blacks fail in American schools because of 'racism'. Liberals and blacks blame the system, while many Conservatives say, "No, blacks fail not because of racism but because they don't apply themselves or because Liberals pushed bad values on the black community." Or, dissident right will say, "No, it's not due to racism but due to lower IQ and less impulse control among blacks." Such unnecessary confusion is due to using 'racism' in a misguided way.
Ism means belief, so why should race + ism mean "evil white supremacists making it worse for other races"? Race + Ism should mean belief in the reality of races and the differences among races.
So, in response to the charge that too many blacks fail in school due to 'racism', the answer should be YES, the reasons are race-ist. Races are real. Racial differences are real. Evolution made black genetics more oriented to warrior, hunter, and thug activities. Evolution is race-ist because it led to the rise of different races. Why else do blacks dominate French sports? It's evolution that made for racial differences. Why else do Jews dominate Wall Street? It's race-ist evolution. Why do blacks act more violently in schools? Because race-ism is true. Blacks are racially different and more prone to fighting and aggression. Ism means belief, Ism means belief, and Race + Ism, properly understood, explains so much. But the term has been willfully misconstrued to sow confusion in our minds.

The thing about race-ism is it will not ignore you even if you ignore it. Race-ism is the truth. Race-ism is what nature would believe if it had a mind. Nature practices race-ism because evolution is about divergences. A single species can diverge into various subspecies(races) that, over time, can develop into separate species. At one time, the apes that eventually evolved into humans were a different race within the same ape species that spawned the chimpanzees. The apes that eventually became humans and the apes that eventually became chimpanzees belong to the same species. But over time, they diverged further and further and became separate species. One bunch of apes became the chimps and another bunch of apes became the proto-human apes that eventually became human. So, race-ism is a process within evolution. As one species cannot instantly turn into another species, it must go through intermediary processes of 'raciation' that eventually lead to the rise of a new species. Though all human races still belong within the same species, the differences are as notable as the differences between brown bears and polar bears or among wolves, coyotes, and various breeds of dogs. Compare the Lapps of Finland with the ghastly Negroes of South Africa or Sudan. Compare the Swedes with the Amazonian Indians. Compare the Tibetans with Australian Aborigines. Compare the Japanese runts with the Maori savages. So, we can ignore race all we want, but it will not ignore us. Europeans can ignore the factor of race as rising numbers of monstrous black African savages flood into Europe. But it won't be long before they realize the impact of Africanization. It's like one can ignore cancer as reality but it won't ignore the one once it begins to spread.

All peoples must know these facts: Jews are smarter. Blacks are tougher. So, if your nation takes in Jews and blacks and then allows inter-meritocracy for all peoples, the result will NOT be equality but domination of elite institutions/industries by Jews and domination of sports, pop music, & sex culture by blacks. Don't we see this pattern all around? Do Gypsies control finance in UK? Do Vietnamese dominate sports in France? Every people should know of their own race, its advantages and disadvantages vis-a-vis other races. And they should do whatever is necessary to protect their institutions, industries, iconography, and idols from the Other.

What must whites seek above all? Liberation. Whites are so used to ruling and dominating the world that their mindset is still stuck in old habits and old ways. In that way, there is still a legacy of 'white privilege'. But today, whites must think more like Algerians & Vietnamese under French rule, Hindus under British rule, Poles under Russian rule, Russians under Mongol rule, Greeks under Turkish rule, and etc. They must think in terms of liberation, or white liberation or white national liberation. Best way to counter the charges of 'white supremacism' is that your side is seeking white liberation. Liberation from what? That is when you explain that whites are now under the tyranny of Jewish globalist finance-media-deep-state and black thuggery, terror, & violence. There is no other way.

The Crisis of Power and Moral Authority in the West? What is to be done when Whites got the Power but No Moral Authority while Blacks got the Moral Authority but No Power?

The two kinds of power. Power-as-means-of-force. Power as moral authority. Ideally, the existing Power has both. It controls the apparatus of violence, which is 'inherent' in any system. After all, there has to be the threat of force, coercion, or violence in case people, especially criminals and radicals, get out of hand. Ideal power would also possess moral authority, and most people would look upon the Power as just, valid, and legitimate.

If there is only power-as-means-of-force, the system can be maintained but only by brutal repression and/or bread-and-circus mass-bribery(which is costly and effective only for the duration of good times). The right-wing militarist regimes that ruled with 'death squads' in Central America had the power of means(especially with the backing of the US), but they lacked moral authority. Same could be said of the Shah of Iran. He had the ruthless means of keeping power by brutality and mass torture. He also had the backing of the US, and there was economic growth that pacified a sector of the population. But most Iranians saw him as illegitimate, and he got no respect.

In contrast, the Castroite Regime of Cuba had, at least for a time(and perhaps even now to some degree), the combination of the means of force and moral authority. It not only set up a ruthless system of control but came to power with the mandate of the people who welcomed the revolution as national liberation from a puppet tyrant backed by the CIA and the Mafia. During the Cold War, massive Soviet support made life in Cuba better than in most Latin American nations. There was less freedom, but many Cubans accepted it as the cost for independence from Yanqui Imperialismo.

Now, from the perspective of moral reasoning, what may be deemed morally justified in a particular time and place may not pass muster. We may say communism is a bad idea and a dead end, and History has indeed passed such judgement on the ideology. And we may look upon the Iranian Revolution of 1979 as ultimately tragic because it led to theocratic tyranny. Still, even if a bad(or even evil) system comes to power, it may be regarded as morally legitimate to the people of the time and place. This was certainly true among many Germans who, at least before things began to go south during World War II, regarded Adolf Hitler's regime as justified, indeed the savior of the German volk, nation, and honor. And plenty of Chinese, despite the horrors of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, have continued to regard the CCP as the legitimate authority in China. And for all his brutality and violence, Stalin had plenty of admirers in the USSR when he was alive(and even after his death).
Moral authority can derive from various sources or reasons. It could be that the new power is a marked improvement over the earlier one. For many Germans, things were much better in National Socialist Germany than in Weimar Germany. Many Russians feel that things got much better under Vladimir Putin than when Russia was ruled by Jewish globalist oligarchs and their stooge Boris Yeltsin. (The Putin legitimacy cannot be understood apart from the hellish 1990s.) But moral authority could also be the product of mass propaganda. Mao Zedong remained legitimate in China despite the massive failure of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution because CCP controlled all media and education. Even if Mao made things worse, the young ones were only taught one thing, and everyone got the news from a single source. So, moral authority isn't the same as true morality. In a system, the majority of people can support a cult of immorality as having moral authority while condemning true morality as the work of the Devil. We have that in the US, where so many people, even 'conservatives', now support 'gay marriage' and worship globo-homo-mania while howling with rage at defenders of true marriage and sanity on sexual reality.

If some systems have the power-as-means-of-force but lack moral authority, some groups have the power of moral authority but lack the means of force. In time, the latter can struggle to gain hard power and triumph. In Iran, the revolutionaries gained moral authority among the people, and mass unrest eventually led to Shah's dethronement and the rise of the Ayatollahs in government. In Vietnam, the national-communists who waved the Ho Chi Minh banner were legitimate in the eyes of many whereas the regime in the South was regarded as a puppet of US imperialism. Granted, plenty of Vietnamese didn't want to be ruled by the communists and would have preferred national independence/liberation minus the Leninism-Stalinism. But the southern regime was so lacking in authority and legitimacy that it failed to muster real support, the kind that might have led to a successful defense of the south. Eventually, the Vietnamese in the north, with more legitimacy and discipline, prevailed over the southern regime that could only maintain power with backing of US imperialism and bribery through bread-and-circuses(or rice-and-blackmarket) made possible by foreign cash infusions.

Speaking of the problems of power-as-means-of-force and power as moral authority, we are witnessing something surreal in the West. Even now in the US, Canada, Australia, and Europe, the power-as-means-of-force is still controlled mostly by whites. Look at most of the upper echelons in the military, government, law firms & courts, police departments, intelligence services, and the like, and most of the members are white(or Jewish). There are prominent non-whites, usually blacks, but they are mostly tokens presented to the public as the FACE of the power that is still mostly white in actual operation.
But the problem is, due to endless PC and anti-white propaganda, whites no longer have much in the way of moral authority. In some ways, they have something close to NEGATIVE moral authority; they might as well be the Devil Incarnate. When the Evil Race controls most of the power-as-means-of-force, the moral implication is they must give it up OR use their power ONLY to redeem their evil white selves or rectify the evil conditions resulting from 'white supremacy' or 'white privilege', i.e. whites must use power to negate white power. We saw in the recent riots the result of such thinking. White people-of-power had the material means to shut down the violence and restore order, but many of them thought that they, as Evil People, had no moral authority to use the power in such manner. (To be sure, the 'paralysis' was also cynical and calculated, a means for the Deep State to make Donald Trump look either too weak, impotent, and incapable to rule OR too tyrannical in calling on the military to restore order.) Initially, it seemed New York would be spared the worst of the rioting because Jews are just too powerful there, but the 'moral logic' spread there as well. Mayor Bill DeBlasio's shtick has been as an Apologetic and Atoning white man, i.e. since whites lack the power of moral authority, DeBlasio felt compelled to use his political authority in support of blacks and against whites(or anyone disregarded by blacks).

If whites got power-as-means-of-force but hardly any moral authority left, blacks don't have much in the way of power-as-means-of-force but have come to dominate power as moral authority. While there are plenty of blacks in government, military, and even in some police departments, most of the upper command structure is still dominated by whites(and of course, most elite blacks are in the pocket of Jewish oligarchs, as has been so obvious with the likes of Barack Obama and Susan Rice). During the Civil Rights Era, blacks gained moral authority over whites because of the Struggle-against-Oppression Narrative. But it was far from total moral authority or moral apotheosis; MLK was a controversial figure in the eyes of many, most Americans opposed race-mixing, and George Wallace found much popularity. But since then, the MLK cult has become the new religion. Nelson Mandela has been lionized as the second greatest man ever. Most American kids think the story of Harriet Tubman is 50% of US history. Hollywood gave us the Magic Negro in stuff like GREEN MILE. And as blacks are into ego-tripping self-worship, they've promoted nothing but themselves. Ironically, the rise of black nihilism also fed into black moral authority. After all, while one aspect of Americanism is the preening moralism — the City on the Hill vision — , the other is the cult of the winner and disdain for losers. People dream of coming to the US to win as Tony Montanas, not to be losers. So, even though most blacks in sports and pop culture have been demented, stupid, lecherous, immoral, or imbecile, the successes made blacks seem ultra-badass-cool in the American(and global) imagination. As Americanist winner-takes-all nihilism has infected the world, the black rapper and black athlete idolatry have made people the world over especially reverential about blackness. Indeed, the reason why the American Indians, though theoretically of even greater moral authority as the Ultimate Victims of American History, are neglected by Americans and the World is because they score low in the game of winner-takes-all nihilism that defines Americanism. In an Americanized world that prizes idolatry over humanism, nihilist points adds to moral authority. Blacks-as-thugs get more hugs.

We are now at the crossroads in history where whites still got most of the power-as-means-of-force but don't know what to do with it during times of crisis as they lack moral authority to act, especially against blacks who commit the most violence. And blacks got the most moral authority, but they are frustrated because they don't control the power-as-means-of-force. Why not? Blacks will say it's due to the history of 'racism', but it's due to black ineptitude, criminality, laziness, stupidity, and irresponsibility. After all, whether one has moral authority or not, the proper way to rise up the ladder of power-as-means-of-force is to master skills, finish school, gain credentials, and demonstrate ability & accountability. Many blacks utterly fail in this. So, even though whites are more than eager to hand over their illegitimate power to blacks who now hog moral authority, the process of power-transference is undermined by the fact that too many blacks remain unqualified to gain and hold any lever of power. The problem isn't White Discrimination but Black Incrimination. Black performance or behavior too often incriminates them as foolish, stupid, violent, inept, irresponsible, demented, and/or jive-ass.
At this juncture in history, many whites are more than willing to hand over power-as-means-of-force to non-whites, especially blacks. But the people they favor most, blacks, are least adept at working in the current system to gain the credentials to take the power from whites. Whites, as redemptive devil incarnate, are telling blacks, "Look we are worthless, and you blacks are holy. We don't deserve what we have, and it should all go to you. So, if you just finish school, act half-way decent and responsible, you can have my job and my status. You can marry my daughter and even do my wife. I will cuck before you and wash your feet and kiss your ass. Just finish college and earn the credentials, and everything I have is YOURS. Look how we made Obama the president simply because he smiled and said nice things." So, whites are willing to hand over all power to blacks as the true master race because blacks are deemed superior in body and soul. But every time whites try to hand over the silver platter, blacks knock it down and mess it all up. (Look what blacks have made of Zimbabwe and South Africa, but let's just pretend blacks are natural saints.)

This is all very confusing. It's further confused because whites claim to be in atonement mode but feel zero moral guilt about what they did to Palestinians and Arabs in their mindless support of Zionist supremacism. And blacks seem to be of two minds as well. On the one hand, blacks pretend to be allies with all the oppressed of the world against white supremacism and white privilege. At the same time, blacks seem most eager to take over the Power created by whites and act as the new imperialist masters of the world. After all, if blacks are truly appalled by supremacism, why don't they denounce blacks in the military? Aren't black military men participating in the US imperialist domination over other parts of the world? Aren't blacks taking part in the Zionist Wars that have killed so many Arabs and Muslims? Didn't Obama wreck entire nations? But blacks don't seem to be bothered by any of that AS LONG AS they perceive the US military as an empowerment vehicle for blacks. So, do blacks really want to resist and end the Power System created by whites or do they just want to take over as New Masters of it? Is supremacism okay with blacks as long as THEY get to dominate the power-as-means-of-force? Is black consciousness like that of Jews? We know from the Jewish Experience that Jewish criticism of Wasp Power wasn't to destroy the power itself but to take it over so that the US empire would be controlled by Jews. The very Jews who'd once denounced US militarism and imperialism in the 60s were later the biggest cheerleaders of US global power once their tribe was at the helm.

Indeed, how do Jews fit into the current crisis? Are Jews also white and lacking in moral authority? Or, as Holocaust Whites, are they exempt from the label of Whites-as-Devil-Incarnate? But what of New York Jews having employed heavy-handed white police to cut down on black crime? And what of Jews having urged white police across the US to take pointers from Israel in controlling the black criminal elements? As yet, Jews still have a lot of moral authority as the Shoah Narrative has been baked into the Western Consciousness, but when so much of Jewish Privilege seems like ultra-white-privilege to blacks and non-whites, how long can Jews sustain this? In the recent riots, Jews publicly sided with black rioters who've been granted moral authority to 'protest against racism', but they seem very nervous and uncomfortable because Jewish Urban Well-being owes so much to white policemen controlling the unruly blacks. Jews are mixing oil & water and getting violent reactions from the melting pot turned frying pan.

Again, moral authority isn't the same as true morality. That blacks got so much moral authority is absolutely scandalous. True, blacks were enslaved and faced discrimination through much of American History, but history is never static. It's ridiculous to regard blacks NOW on the basis of blacks THEN. It's like it'd be stupid to regard Chinese NOW on basis of how Chinese were 100 yrs ago. Back then, China was the Sick Man of Asia. Today, it is a rising or even risen power. Germanic Barbarians were once victims of Roman conquerors. Later, they were rulers over the Romans. And sometimes, history changes fast. Jews were on the ropes in Europe during World War II, but they are now rulers of the West. Also, black behavior owes more to evolution over 100,000 yrs than 200 yrs of slavery. Besides, black conditions in America were hardly all that oppressive by world/historical standards as most of human history has been about oppression, wars, empires, slavery, and etc. The real problem with blacks is they evolved to be the thug-hunter-warrior race. Blame evolution in Africa where black traits were selected for mastery in chucking spears at hippos and beating on bongo drums and shaking booty. That's why blacks succeed in sports and funky music while often failing with books and math.
So, black moral authority is really a joke(but then 'woke' is a joke, or joke that no one gets). It is more the product of Jewish propaganda, white gullibility, black megalomania, American nihilism, and Jungle Fever/Jungle Faith. Jews pushed black holiness to bait whites with 'white guilt', thereby making them subservient to Jews(as 'fellow victim' allies of blacks). In the post-Christian world, white imagination hungered for a new god, and the Magic Negro filled the void(along with globo-homo, it seems). Blacks just can't get enough of themselves, and the American Obsession with sports and pop music turned blacks into demi-gods. So many Americans look to Jay-Z and Ice-Cube's twitter feed for 'moral instruction' and 'spiritual guidance'. This is why even a lowlife moron like George Floyd, who died more from bad drugs than a white knee, is now suddenly bigger than even Michael Jackson.
But then, moral authority can even be held by the Devil, as homos and trannies have so well illustrated. Most people are incapable of moral reasoning, and their sense of good-and-evil really derives from manipulation of idolatry, iconography, and mantras. Just chant 'black lives matter' a bunch of times while envisioning George Floyd as some angel, and that's Moral Authority in the Current Year. Donald Trump says St. George is looking down upon us from heaven. More likely, an angel has a knee on the ghastly Negro's neck and is about to cast his stupid black ass down to hell.

In the past, whites had both power-as-means-of-force and much moral authority. Look back 100 yrs ago to 1920, and it was a proud white nation. Look back 50 yrs to 1970, and it was still a nation where whites had material power and moral power, though slipping. But now, the US is a Jewish-controlled world. Jewish Power is real as both means-of-force and moral authority. Jews do control most of the top institutions and many top industries. Jews not only hog Deep State power but use Antifa as paramilitary goon force to terrorize white patriots. Antifa is their 'Luca Brasi'.
Jews also have moral power as the Shoah People. But because Jews are nervous about being perceived as powerful, their power-as-means-of-force is mostly hidden. If Jews said, "We rule America with material power backed by moral authority", things would be somewhat less confusing. But while Jews make a big deal of their moral authority, they try to hide their actual means of power. As a result, many people are confused as to who really rules America. Jews rule America, but Jews say "White Privilege Rules America"(which would suggest American Power is illegitimate). Jewish Power is the uppermost of White Privilege, but Jews position themselves as allies of Diversity against White Privilege.
Now, things might be clearer if white goyim spelled it all out and said, "No, Jewish-White Privilege rules America, and we white goyim are now just cuck-collaborators of Jews who hold the supreme power. We whites do as Jews tell us to, like waging Wars for Israel, hating on Russia & Iran, supporting Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians, and arresting more blacks to make cities safer for Jews and homos." But as whites who say such would be condemned of 'Antisemitism' and hounded out of their positions, whites just go on with the charade that THEY rule America while Jews are saintly allies of blacks and Diversity oppressed by White Privilege. But such a grand narrative means that the Existing Power System in the US is utterly lacking in moral legitimacy and undeserving of moral authority. If indeed US is ruled by White Privilege, then it is ruled by Evil because White Privilege is, as we've all been told over and over, an ill-gotten product of history of white supremacy.
Current Power would seem legitimate if Jews said they got the power since they do have moral authority(as the noble and tragic Shoah People). But Jews are too nervous about being blamed for all the problems IF they were to openly admit their dominant position in the US. After all, admission of power has a way of eroding moral authority as most people tend to blame those in power for whatever goes wrong. (Wasps admitted they ruled America, and guess what happened? They got blamed for everything and lost legitimacy.) It's like the Castroite regime in Cuba and the Ayatollahs in Iran began with lots of moral authority but much of the respect has eroded away over the years. So, if Jews want to maintain their identity as Holy Holocaust People in pristine condition, it's not wise to admit that they now have the power and, as such, are responsible for all that go wrong in the US and the world. (Netanyahu's arrogant style of "I rule the goyim" has undermined the moral authority of Zion in the eyes of the world.)

Anyway, whites are cucks of Jews, but the Jewish Narrative says White Privilege(of the goy kind mostly) rules America. The notion of 'white privilege' implies that the power held by whites is illegitimate. Then, the ONLY way to make the power legitimate is by handing it over to those with moral authority. Jews got the moral authority but don't want to admit they got the power. How about to homos? Jewish Media and Academia imbued homos with great deal of moral and 'spiritual' capital, and so many Americans now eagerly vote for any 'gay' candidate on grounds that homos got moral authority. And for awhile, it seemed homos would spearhead gentrification and make big cities safe of the Negro Criminal Menace. Also, as Obama belonged to Jews and homos, he spent most of his presidency pushing the Section 8 line, or More Gentrification. But then, Obama had to prove his street cred with blacks and dabbled with BLM, not knowing it would blow up big time. And then Donald Trump happened, and Jews got desperate with various means to unseat him. They tried the Russia Collusion hoax, the Ukraine Impeachment, the Covid Crisis, and then black riots. Riling up black rage was deemed especially necessary as Jews began to fear that Trumpism might make blacks think twice about supporting the Democratic Party that seemed more about globo-homo and immigration than conditions for blacks. If Trump offered more jobs to blacks, the Democrats could at least offer them free loot in the form of riots. But the riots are also blowing up in Jewish faces as blacks tend to be rather unruly and strike out in every direction, especially in blue cities. While Jews could handle homos like well-trained dogs, unleashing black rage is like letting pit-bulls run loose. You never quite know whom they will maul next. Homos march in parades, blacks loot in riots. Homos raise property values for yuppies, blacks drive down values and drive out businesses. (Another reason why the Democrats may be pandering more to blacks is that immigration decreased under Trump. Perhaps, Democrats hoped that MORE IMMIGRATION would eventually make black votes less essential to the Party. After all, California would be comfortably Democratic even without the black vote as all those yellows and browns vote Democratic. But if immigration continues to ebb, Democrats will have to shore up black votes.)

Still, we all got the memo: (1) Blacks got supreme moral authority and have the right to rule but don't rule. (2) Whites got no moral authority and don't deserve to rule but rule with all their ill-gotten white privilege. Then, what is to be done? Hand over power to blacks? But how many blacks are well-schooled and ready for such task? The Current West says the unruly blacks should rule over whites who have no right to rule but rule anyway due to legacy of 'racism', the greatest evil of all time in the whole universe, but it has no means of bringing about the necessary transference of power because whites continue to be better-credentialed while blacks continue to fail.
Besides, the Jews who really do rule choose to remain in the shadows while blaming White Privilege, thus spreading the impression that the West is ruled illegitimately by whites who are utterly lacking in moral authority. White apologetics makes for poor authority of power. Then, it's no wonder that Jews and whites were, for a time, so happy with globo-homo as the face of US power. For Jews, homos were useful and loyal proxies of Jewish Supremacist Power, and for deracinated and cucked whites, homo power seemed white-friendly and imbued with moral authority(in a world where decadence was the New Normal in righteousness). But there was something so shallow and hollow about homos(and then trannies) as the stalwart face of moral authority in the West, especially as so many homos were affluent and working so chummily with the Deep State, Las Vegas, Hollywood, and Wall Street. In time, it just seemed like a deviant form of White Privilege. It's so much more compelling to run with a narrative that involves slavery, whipping, lynchings, police brutality, and 'innocent' black men being killed in the streets by 'racism'. But how long will it take for blacks to earn the credentials and gain the skills to receive the power that is being handed to them on a silver platter by cucky-wuck whites?

Dissonance between what 'Liberal' Urban Elites SAID and what they DID led to the Current Crisis of Radical Lunacy among the Clueless Young

All this lunacy about Saint George Floyd!

The current reality resulted from the fading of the balance between SAY and SEE, especially as the SAY was used as cover to push against the SEE.

Ever since the Civil Rights Era, politicians and prominent people have been SAYING good things about blacks. The SAY was pro-black.

But what did people SEE in their everyday lives as years passed? Rise in black criminality and pathology. And things got worse and worse. Also, the boomers, the biggest generation ever, were so busy yapping against the evils of the older generation that they were, for a time, oblivious of things falling apart.

Still, precisely because the SEE was so at odds with the SAY(that hadn't gone totally PC back then, i.e. blacks were praised but not yet 'sacralized'), many people(even Liberals) had some sense of actual reality. They heard and said the SAY but they could SEE what was really going on. They heard from their friends and families about black crime, or they experienced it first hand. Even if not victims of crime, they could SEE the rise in grime.

Finally, the boomers got in control of things. Since they had 'moral cred' as the 'progressive counterculture generation', they could do things that would have been condemned among the older generation. (It's like Richard Nixon could go to China and make deals with the USSR because of his anti-commie credentials.) Especially beginning with Billy Boy Clinton, the boomers decided to counter Big City crime(that was especially damaging to Democrats). They pushed back against what what they could SEE, which was mostly black thuggery and violence. (As Jews came to elite dominance as boomers, there was the Jewish angle as well. Jews could get away with more stuff as they had the 'holocaust' shield.)

But even as boomer elites began to clamp down on the SEE, they kept with the same SAY. Actually, they pushed the SAY even harder. Blacks went from objects of sympathy/reverence to those of worship/sanctity. There were two reasons for this. Boomers came of age during the Civil Rights Era that defined the times. But on a more cynical and opportunistic level, it was a means to cover up their war on the SEE, which was too much black crime. If Clinton and NY-ers were to get tough on black crime, they had to mask their tough 'racist' actions with endless paeans to black holiness. (Another problem was the rise of rap culture, or the idolization of black nihilism. If black thuggery was once seen as a bad thing, rap culture made it 'cool'. SWEET SWEETBACK was a cult thing in the 70s, but such became the mainstay of American culture in the 90s. If THE GODFATHER made Italian-Americans idealize mafia patriarchs, Rap culture led to black and white kids idolizing street punks.)

Still, because the War on the SEE was carried out for real, crime did plummet in places like NY. And even in other cities where black crime remained problematic, the downtown areas improved markedly and became safer than ever. Areas once depressed in value with black housing projects became gentrified and among the priciest places on Earth. The best parts of the cities, the downtown areas, sprung back to life. The war on the SEE worked. Yet, the SAY not only remained pro-black but even more so. The more the whites, Jews, homos, and immigrants pushed out blacks, the more they claimed to worship the Magic Negro and Badass Bro.

No one quite realized what kind of impact this would have on the younger generation of Americans, especially affluent urban whites. Millennials lived in a far safer and nicer world due to the war on black crime, but for that very reason, they experienced less of raw urban reality as counterbalance against the indoctrination of the SAY.
Earlier generations also heard the SAY but witnessed and experienced the SEE. Just like people in the Soviet Union heard the holy SAY about the glories of communism but could SEE that the shelves were empty, it used to be that many Americans understood the SAY to be largely BS as they could SEE so much black pathology in big cities.
But among the Millennial privileged in big cities, there was far less SEE to prick the bubble of the SAY that became ever more obnoxious with 'wokeness'. Or, even if some Millennials did experience black thuggery and crime, they were so enamored of the black rap gangsta idol that they cucked before black violence than get angry about it.

And so, we have the current paradox. Younger whites in cities are so much better off because the boomers used the War on the SEE to drastically reduce black crime by means of incarceration, stop-and-frisk, gentrification, and immigration. But because they were raised with the SAY of black holiness, they became reverential of the very thing that had to be clamped down to make cities better. And as black crime was reduced to a considerable degree, there was less getting mugged-by-reality among Millennials to balance out the bogosity of the SAY. So, Millennials became yay to the SAY.

Some have compared the current nuttery to the Cultural Revolution in China, and there is one striking similarity. After Mao Zedong brought upon total disaster with the Great Leap Forward(that led to mass famines and tens of millions of deaths), something had to be done about Maoism to make the Chinese economy recover so that people could eat again. People during the Great Leap could SEE what was happening. Even Mao came around to admitting the Great Leap failed. So, Maoism was rolled back in action, BUT the SAY remained the same. Mao was still the wise leader, the great helmsman, the sun that rises in the East. There was less Maoism in action but still lots of Maoism as official ideology. So, even though the economy recovered by rolling back Maoism, the younger generation was nevertheless indoctrinated with the mythology of Maoism. At the very least, even the true-believers of Maoism during the Great Leap could SEE the result of its wholesale application. The brutal SEE countered and balanced out the official SAY. But by 1966, the Chinese economy had recovered enough so that the famines were over and forgotten. So, the young ones, who weren't starving, got the SAY but there was no SEE to warn them against Maoism in radical action. The result? The madness of the Cultural Revolution. (Now, we see that capitalists are just as capable of pushing their own brand of cultural revolution, but then capitalist have been smashing things for quite some time already. Jewish globo-homo capitalist vandalize churches and streets with homo symbols. Zionist capitalists also fund ISIS and other terrorists who've ransacked so much cultural treasure in places like Syria.)

In both the US and China, the SEE was rolled back but the SAY remained the same. Or worse, the SAY intensified even as the SEE was reduced. Blackness was praised in words while blackness was suppressed in action. Maoism was praised in words while Maoism was rolled back in action. One might think the anti-black and anti-Maoist actions would reduce the power of the pro-black and pro-Mao SAY. But the effect was the opposite. With less black crime, there was less mugging-by-reality to wake up the 'woke'. With no more Maoist famines, there was less starving-by-reality to warn young people of the dangers of radicalism. And so, China had to learn a second time of the dangers of Maoism with the loony Cultural Revolution, and the US has to go through the lesson of black pathology once again.

The lesson from all this is the Danger of saying one thing while doing another thing. Now, one might think this is a clever way to cover up pragmatic deeds with idealistic sermons, but once the deeds succeed, the bogus sanctimony of the words is less likely to be checked by reality.

For example, if an African tribe says hyenas and lions are noble while hunting them down to make the village safer, it will result in greater safety for the tribe as there will be fewer lions and hyenas. But it also means that the young tribesmen will revere lions and hyenas EVEN MORE because there will be fewer lions and hyenas to attack them and wake them to the dangerous reality of big predators. As such, they will condemn the elders for having killed the sacred lions/hyenas and welcome the big animals to the village... with grim results of course.
When the SEE is greatly reduced while the SAY is greatly vamped, the SAY will turn especially cancerous because the successful war on the SEE reduced the grim reality that once served as a check on the rosy sermons of the SAY.

The SAY has gotten so obnoxious that white progs aren't really moralistic. They are sanctimonious. They don't operate by moral reflection or reasoning in relation to reality. Rather, they are addicted to the sanctimony of worshiping their favorite idols. This is the obvious result of humanism being replaced by idolatry.

When the Word and the World are not in alignment, people who take the Word to heart act in ways that do harm to the World and then to themselves because Reality always takes revenge on those who push falsity. So, in the end, the World wins over the Word, but by then, so much harm had been done. So, it's better to use the Word in alignment and consonance with how the World really is. Good use of the Word guides people to act properly in the World. It's like good medical advice leads to responsible behavior that is good for health. But when the Word is bad in medicine, those heeding the advice will suffer in the World and make it a worse place as a World full of sick people is a kind of hell. Eventually, the physical suffering caused by bad Word will force people to change course in the World, but by then, they'd needlessly suffered because they'd blindly heeded the Word. Consider what the Word on Covid-19 did to the World Economy.

Eventually, the mindless promotion of Negrolatry will lead to a reaction because it is a biological fact that blacks evolve to be most violent, aggressive, and pathological. Indeed, worshiping blackness will lead to outcomes worse than worshiping Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, and Mao Zedong. After all, despite the horrors caused by communism and Nazism, none of them managed to, in the end, destroy German Civilization, Russian Civilization, and Chinese Civilization. But when white people take blackness to heart as the ultimate holiness, they are paving the way for the total destruction of the West. Why? Africans Africanize whereas Europeans Europeanize. As whites worship the false god of blackness and welcome more mass-migrations of black, the result will be the Africanization of the West. Then, it's Adios White Race. Then, even if whites finally realize the foolishness of the 'woke' Word, their World will be too far gone to be saved and restored.

Negrolatry or Negro-Idolatry as It pertains to the Electronic Mind and the Common Thread — Reflections on Blackness as Unifying Jungle Faith, the Spiritual Corollary to Jungle Fever, in the Aftermath of Mass White Spiritual Cuckery to Blackness as Holiness

Negrolatry has something to do with the Electronic Mind and the Common Thread. It seems, if whites got Jungle Fever for black bodies, they now have Jungle Faith in black souls. Caucasians might as well be called 'Cuckasians'. But, why is Modern Consciousness so partial to this kind of thinking? Let's consider the transformations of consciousness resulting from Modernism and Electronica.

The rise of the Electronic Mind has fundamentally altered modern consciousness. In a way, it has erased or at least eclipsed consciousness as it had been understood. Prior to electronic communication, entertainment, and media, people generally processed one idea, idol, or icon at a time and for a duration. It might be awhile before they got another dose of information or indoctrination. It's like a meal that you consume and slowly digests throughout the day. It's no wonder the Novel caught on as a form of popular art because, when not working, people had lots of 'dead time'. Without the TV, radio, internet, and iphone as constant means of stimulation/distractions, people could immerse themselves in stories with many characters and extended plots. And if they wanted to read another book, they had to go to the book store or library on foot. And it took some time for books on order to arrive. So, there were always lots of 'dead time' BETWEEN social activities. Even many privileged people didn't have many books, and you had to live in a good-sized town to have access to any kind of real library. Most people had Bibles, Almanacs, and few works of ideas and fiction. Because non-stop bombardments on the senses and the mind were inconceivable in the pre-electronic age(which was most of human history), people developed more consistent and continuous views of their lives, values, and meaning. People became immersed in the Bible. Or, for meaning, they became involved in the family, the community. Or because the economy was labor-intensive and society had yet to provide much in the way of safety-nets, people spend a lot of time with work and derived meaning from production. When you eat a meal and wait awhile before the next one, you have ample time to digest all of it. In contrast, if you're snacking all the time and going from flavor to flavor to flavor, the body doesn't really know what to make of it, especially as you keep eating for the flavors than hunger and need. Your digestive process becomes inconsistent and incomplete, even contradictory, than consistent and complete.

Take the Electronic Mind in the experience of cinema, or the Movic Mind. A cinephile might, on the same day, take in a trashy Hollywood comedy, a crazy Hong Kong action flick, a b/w 'classic' of yesteryear that is relatively wholesome & sentimental, and a dour or solemn European art film. What happens when the mind experiences such drastic and total shifts and contrasts in tone, mood, and meaning in expression in rapid succession? Now, one may note that the human mind was always multi-faceted and shifted gears from one perspective to another. After all, people appreciated both comedy and tragedy in Shakespearean and Ancient Greek times. As human emotions have a wide range, everyone through the ages had something to laugh about, something to cry about, something to tickle his fancy, something to rouse him to fury, and etc. Even a stern priest might tell a bawdy joke or two. Still, he might say it underneath his breath. He would know it's just a morsel, not the main course, of life. For most of human history, there was more consistency and insistence on what was essential, crucial, and important as opposed to what was peripheral, trivial, or disposable. So, if a priest were to tell a dirty joke, he would say it in hushed tone with someone he's close to. His input with vulgarity wouldn't be the same as his investment in spirituality. Some things got more light and attention while other things remained in the shadows or hidden around the corner. Also, even if someone experienced two highly contrasting or contentious views around the same time, the chances were he would have had time to address the contradictions to some degree as the chances of yet another problematic idea or idolatry to cross his path would have been unlikely.

But things are different in the Electronic Age. In a city with lots of movie theaters, one could go from one reality to another, one after the other. In the past, if one attended an opera, he would have the whole day or week to ponder and process what he'd seen and heard. But in the electronic age, one might encounter an artistic/intellectual experience of great depth but, even before processing it halfway, might take in other stuff — ones that utterly violate and demean the spirit of the work of depth —that jolts his senses on the same day. When the mind/senses are constantly taking in new stimuli without ever fully processing earlier ones, what happens? It's akin to people who keep shopping without ever using their purchases to proper use. It got even crazier with the rise of TV, then Cable TV and Video technology. And then, things got super-crazy with the coming of the internet followed by devices people carry around at all times. Even before one could properly ponder and process one consumption of entertainment/propaganda, he could be fed, even bombarded, with another and then another then another, all in quick succession.
Besides, the Electronic Mind has gotten so accustomed to endless sensory-stimulation that, like someone sitting before a slot machine, it feels compelled to absorb more and more sensory data in the manner of an addict than an autodidact. (US empire has become cancerous in this manner. It feels this constant need for more growth, more expansion, more power, more control, more hegemony, more wars, and etc. without ever fully formulating what it's all about and why. Shopaholic US empire must have more just to have more.) Just like many people need more and more sex without thought of relationship, emotional life, & commitment and just like too many people need to eat and eat without any meaningful relation to food, nutrition, & health, so many modern minds, Movic or Networkic, have become insatiable for endless streams of sensory data. Indeed, they can't handle 'dead time' because it would call upon them to sit still and finally process and think about what they've read, seen, or experienced. Their minds demand constant 'motion' as distraction from the meaning of existence.

One reason why the most popular works of literature happen to be in Teen Fiction or Stupid Sex(like in FIFTY SHADES OF GREY) is because people are reading fast for thrills than meaning, depth, or originality. It is the age when even adults talk seriously about HARRY POTTER and HUNGER GAMES. In Peter Weir's movie TRUMAN SHOW, the TV junkies are rooting for Truman to escape and break free from the TV world, but they are hooked to the TV even as they cheer on Truman. And when Truman finally breaks free, the movie ends with a TV junkie wondering what is next on TV. He was so into Truman's adventure but almost instantly forgets it as he channels-surfs for the next big thrill on the Tube. So, there isn't even much time BETWEEN the Truman Show and the Next Show. It's total insta-immersion in one thing followed by total insta-immersion in the next thing, even if the two things may be diametrically opposed in tone, style, tempo, message. Electronic Media isn't only instant but totalizing. A reverend may give a powerful sermon in a church, but he will tell a dirty joke behind closed doors or in the hallway with a friend or intimate. One thing is infinitely more important than the other. But, everything conveyed via electronic media has a totality of expression, an authority equal to any other. Nothing is a whisper, and everything is a shout. Indeed, the most outrageous, shameless, and 'dirty' things have an advantage as electronic media are the product of amplification, and loud stuff is more suited for electricity than quiet stuff is. A rock show or vulgar comedy comes through with greater force than a solemn sermon or reflective drama. No wonder superhero movies, rap videos, lewd comedies, general pornification of mainstream culture, and partisan-propagandizing of the news tend to dominate the airwaves and social networks.

Still, as people cannot indulge in mindless trash all the time, they also seek out meaning. They go from 'porning' to mourning, shrieking to seeking, sensuality to spirituality, nihilism to moralism, and etc. Sometimes, one masquerades as the other. So, Quentin Tarantino's INGLORIOUS BASTERDS has been sold as both nihilistic celebration of sadism and a moral statement about World War II, a kind of Morality-Porn, which can also be said of RAMBO, a dumb trashy gung-ho fantasy masquerading as serious statement about 'Vietnam'. Rappers wallow in thuggery but pretend to be 'speaking truth to power'. The decadent hedonism of globo-homo vanity has become conflated with 'spiritual' redemption, especially as so many churches now fly the 'gay flag'. (In some ways, such spiritual-vandalization is worse than the physical destruction of churches under communism. After all, while physical attacks on churches ennobled Christianity as victim of barbaric violence, the church collaboration with globo-homo degeneracy is an utter betrayal at the spiritual level. A Christian may face physical defeat but still possess a victorious soul, which is the story of Jesus. But when the Christian spirit succumbs to the sickly and hollow vanity of neo-aristo homos who work in league with neo-imperialist deep state and super-capitalist oligarchy, it means the Faith is dead from within. Furthermore, communism's attack on the Church was, at the very least, not without moral and material justification. Communists wanted people to break free of the opiate of religion, especially as it had been controlled and manipulated by the ruling elites, and see reality for what it is and work to create a better society on Earth than dream of some fantastic Kingdom of Heaven. Though history judged communism to be more bad than good, there was genuine moral and philosophical reasons for its opposition to religion. In contrast, globo-homo-mania is utterly cynical and opportunistic in its infiltration and corruption of the Church. Even though it is ultimately the tool of Jewish globalist-supremacists whose objective is to destroy Christianity and the Goy Moral Order, the agenda pretends to represent the TRUE meaning of Christianity and all forms of spirituality... because what? The highest form of divination is to instruct humanity that nothing is more sacred than homo fecal-penetration and tranny penis-cutting?)

Because of endless barrages of contrasting and contradictory images, idols, and images in the electronic media — with each image, idol, icon, or idea vying for totality of the moment for the duration of its hold over the consumer — , the Electronic Mind is bound to be fractured and fragmentary. One minute, you could be watching an exciting TV cop drama about law-and-order heroes, next you could be watching a gangsta rap music video extolling the thug lifestyle. You could be sucked into a Zionist talking point on Youtube followed by a pro-BDS video. Even if you were to be politically partisan and choose only one ideological point of view, there is hardly any consistency on either the 'left'(or the 'right' for that matter) as the 'left' went from Mayday & the Workers to Gayday and the 'Wokers'. The so-called 'Intersectionality' is a constant clash of 'totalized' priorities and interests. And the 'right', though accused of 'white supremacism', goes out of its way to snuff white politics while promoting Zionism and Lady Maga. (Today's 'conservatives' are supposed to support Israel because it has maybe the biggest 'gay pride' parade in the world. Right, 'True Conservatism' is about praising the Jew for turning the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah, so says Dennis Prager.)

Even in the political and cultural landscape where most of the Electronic Express — media, academia, entertainment, and state propaganda — is controlled by so-called 'Liberals' or 'Progressives', it is difficult to push a single, consistent, or unified line, message, or narrative because, whereas ideologies tend to be radical and purist, entertainment tends to be irreverent, hedonistic, and nihilistic. Even if every last vestige of conservative ideology/politics were to be banned from media and social network, the contrasts and contradictions between Liberal entertainment and Liberal ideology would be bewildering. A culture that promotes both MLK and David Chapelle, both TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD and DJANGO UNCHAINED, and both Mandela as saint and rappers as cool thugs will be all over the map. Such problems exist in China as well. Ruled by the CCP, China is far more ideologically monolithic than the West. But its often nihilistic-consumer-hedonist entertainment serves a very different vision of the world than the Official Morality & Consciousness promoted by the State. Even with total suppression of conservatism, Liberal States will end up with deep fissures inherent in what Sam Francis called 'Anarcho-Tyranny'. While the Power developed Anarcho-Tyranny as a means of control, it can run out of control, as has happened with BLM riots in both the US and EU.

And there is so much confusion. Are white women 'fellow victims' along with POC of evil white men? Or are they modern witches, or 'Beckys', who call the police on innocent black men? Are Muslims to be welcomed as immigrants or blown to smithereens as terrorists? Should homos push globo-homo even further in big cities, OR should they apologize to blacks for taking the limelight away from black issues and BLM? Should Liberals insist on the equality of the races on grounds that 'race is just a social construct' or lionize blacks as special and superior on account of their tougher muscles, louder voices, bouncier buns, and bigger dongs? Who are More Woman, the 'Terfs' or the Trannies? Should good white 'liberals' prioritize Gentrification or the Gentle Giant? Or maybe the two can be combined by moving the Gentle Giants to the 'racist' Suburbs while the cities further gentrify? Or maybe white 'liberals' are afraid that blacks are beginning to catch onto the Blue Privilege Agenda.

All such contradictory positions or attitudes are pushed by Electronica, and each message vies for its totality. So, if one were to watch these views in succession in a single sitting, he will experience a kind of whiplash between one insta-totality to another and then another and then another. At the end of the day, he will have a cubist mind that feels disjointed, disoriented, perplexed, and neurotic. Such is the modernist mindset, but most people, even modernists, find it unsatisfying, confused, and difficult. It's like people may be provoked, fascinated, and challenged by the works of Pablo Picasso, but they don't really find enjoyment, any more than from Serial Music or other forms of Modern(ist) Music. Modernism may engage the mind/intellect but usually offers no assurance emotionally or spiritually. There is no common unifying theme, but the eternal mind/soul craves it. Then, the dominant 'idology'(something between idolatry and ideology) will be whatever or whichever that attains the semblance of the Common Thread in the realm of the Electronic Mind. And this is why, currently at least, there is Negrolatry, Jew Worship, and Holy Homo Reverence. The biggest power in Electronica, the Jews, have used all their means to create a web across electronic spaces to ensure that Jews, blacks, and homos are part of the Common Thread DESPITE all the contradictions inherent in the electronic system. Howard Stern once declared himself the 'King of All Media', and Jews would have us believe that Jewish Themes(along those of blacks and homos) are the unifying threads across all nations, cultures, and times.

Take, for example, the 'gay rainbow' as symbol, emblem, insignia, even battle regalia. It is no longer associated only with homos but with just about everything. You want to have some Oreos, grab a burger, or drink some soda? Well, look at the advertising, and there are 'pride cookies', 'pride burgers', and 'pride sodas'. You love Israel as the Holy Land? Well, the Holy Land is now inseparable from the mantra of 'Israel has the biggest gay pride parades'. You want to be a Good Conservative? Well, the new line according to Neocons who control Conservatism Inc. is that 'gay marriage is conservative values' and 'Lady Maga is special'. When BLM was all the rage during the final yrs of the Obama presidency, many of its rallies were peppered with 'gay pride' flags, indeed as if BLM and the 'gay rainbow' were part of the same Happy Meal package. The globo-homo logo has become so 'sacrosanct' in globalism that even Palestinians, though oppressed by Jews and globalist homos in the US deep state, try so hard to link their struggle with 'gay pride'. We live in a world of Logo over Logos. Even though globo-homo-mania is the neo-missionary project of Jewish-controlled US imperialism, those claiming to be anti-US-imperialist also wave the globo-homo banner. It's like 'With Gays on Our Side' is the new 'With God on Our Side'.
Of course, some nations have held out against globo-homo, but they tend to submit to another globo-enforced Common Thread, which is Jew Worship. So, even as Russia is constantly attacked by Jewish Power, it is always making noises about how the Russian state is good for Jews, how Russian values are justified ESPECIALLY because Russia defeated Nazi Germany that killed Jews. In the US, 'liberals' and 'conservatives' may growl at each other on certain issues, but both major parties are totally united on Jew Worship, support for Israel/Zionism, and shoveling more Fed money to Wall Street. And both parties are committed to shutting down BDS. The academia is supposed to be 'liberal' and critical of the Power, but most of it is amazingly silent about Jewish Power and the Zionist Question. While there are pockets of academia that do criticize Israeli policy, they are mostly ineffective and ignored by the MSM that is totally Jewish-controlled and by politicians who are totally owned by Jewish donor class. Donald Trump, like Russia, has been attacked by Jews from day one, but he's all about 'I Luv Jews and Israel'. Even as blacks bitch about 'white privilege' and 'police brutality', few prominent blacks dare mention that Jews played a big role in Gentrification and Israelization of the US police. (ADL played a role in turning US police in big cities into the Zionic-Bionic Men.) Thus, Jew-Worship is part of the Common Thread. Despite all the cacophony of Electronic Media with so many disparate and opposing views, most are united in sucking up to Jewish Power and 'Muh Holocaust'. The only truly vocal opposition to Jewish Power comes from the Dissident Right, but as Jews control the Platforms and Media(and as the US government and justice system haven't done much to control Jewish Monopoly), speaking-truth-to-Jewish-Power still has a long way to go before the Holy Jewish Spell is broken.

When we take white women, there is no Common Thread of their goodness, wonderfulness, or holiness. While white women are promoted as victims of white fratboy rapists in colleges or the 'pussy-grabbing' Orange Man, they are evil Beckys if they dare to call the police on illegal or dubious black behavior. White women as pro-globo-homo feminists are good, but white women as TERFS are bad. So, white women could be virtuous in one thread but villainous in another. Same goes for Muslims. As immigrants, they are holy victims of evil Donald Trump and 'white supremacist Islamophobes'. But as Iranians or Syrians who resist Jewish Supremacist Power, they might as well be subhuman who should be blown to smithereens.

But there is a Common Thread about blacks, possibly even more than for Jews and Homos. Upon closer scrutiny, the common thread of Globo-Homo across so many sectors and spheres is artificial and even antithetical. After all, what does homosexuality have to do with Oreo cookies or a hamburger? What exactly is a 'pride burger'? Why must Burger King bill itself as Bugger King? Food has NOTHING to do with homosexuality. (Even Jack Tripper of THREE'S COMPANY only pretended to be homo.) And what does BLM have to do with globo-homo? What do black protests about imagined White Police Brutality have to do with homo pride or tranny celebration, especially when the police has used extra force against blacks precisely to keep cities safe for Jews and HOMOS? And why did Christianity cave to Queertianity? What do God, Jesus, and Salvation have to do with men buggering another or a man with a wig pretending to be a 'woman'? And why do sports franchises celebrate globo-homo? What does Football or Basketball have to do with fruits and fairies, especially as sports are about machismo disdaining sissy boys? So, the common thread of globo-homo isn't natural. It's been enforced by Jewish Power.

In contrast, the Common Thread of Negrolatry is more understandable and more natural as blacks dominate the fields that get most people excited, thrilled, or hyper. Rap and Hip-Hop are the most popular musical forms around the world, and so naturally, many peoples of all races are madly into Negrolatry in pop music. Also, sports make people lose their minds. Globalization and mass migration have led to black athletic colonization even in non-black nations. Britons, French, Dutch, and other Europeans look to blacks as their New National Heroes. Black Idol Imperialism has reached even Japan. In China, yellow boys hug their basketballs like women hug pregnant bellies as they watch the NBA, the bastion of Negro athletes who are the most revered 'heroes' for many young Chinese. So, blacks got pop music and sports. Also, the internet has pretty much made pornography accessible to all the world, and something like 1/3 of all internet traffic is pornographic. And this led to the spread of Negro Dong Fetish around the world. The other black fetish among non-blacks is 'twerking'. Even college-educated women in US, Canada, Australia, Russia, Japan, and Europe are 'twerking' their buns like black women. What were black women thinking when they came up with 'twerking'? It's really 'sex with negro dongs' dance. There was a time when pornography was a Red Light district affair or kept to adults. Nowadays, even young boys and girls grow up to porny images that are easily accessible through smartphones. Also, as the culture-at-large has been pornified, there is hardly any shame or opprobrium associated with overt sexuality. White female singers and white actresses now regularly appear in music videos, TV shows, and movies as the sexual interests of Negro men who are now promoted over white men. So, Negroes not only got sports and pop music but the pornographic imagination, the three big thrills of globalism. That's a lot of Common Thread in pop culture/entertainment.

But Negroes are not only objects of worship as Victors but as Victims. Unlike the Narrative about Homo Victimization, which is mostly bogus as homos were never a specific group — besides, even when homosexuality was held in contempt or criminalized, plenty of homos were born into privilege and abused power in all sorts of ways — , the Narrative of Black Victimization in the West is true enough. As a backward savage people, they were preyed upon by fellow blacks, Arabs, and whites as slave labor. The Atlantic Slave Trade was truly a horror, and blacks did struggle as slaves in the New World. (Though black slavery in the US gets the worst rap, it was far worse in Latin America.) Also, there was the Civil Rights Movement, which had a certain greatness to it but for the fact that the 'racists' were, to a large extent, justified in their Fear of the Tougher, More Aggressive, and More Thuggish Negroes. It wasn't just about the color of the skin but tone of the muscle as Negro men, with equal freedom with white men, were bound to eventually kick the white boys' ass — blacks call white men 'white boys' — and colonize white wombs as women naturally drop loser men and go with winner men. Especially as blacks have louder and more booming voices, the black holler for truth and justice felt more powerful and compelling in the white imagination. So, blacks came to dominate the Common Thread as both high-fiving Victors in sports/entertainment and holy Victims in a spiritualized vision of History that said whites must atone for 'racism'. (Even as modernism billed itself as avant-garde and more evolved, its contradictions led to obsessions with the primitive. In its confusion and obfuscation, it sought out the elementary and vital in, say, African Art and nude Tahitian women. Initially, the fascination was intellectual, but as the years passed and as modernism lost its luster and was eclipsed by an uninhibited pop culture, the primitive went from a cultural artifact to the main fuel of post-Western Imagination.) Because whites worship blacks as natural victors, their guilt about blacks as victims was bound to be greater. With Negro-hood dominating the Common Thread as both dominant victor bodies in sports/entertainment and main victim souls of oppression/injustice, the resulting Mandela/Mandingo Complex among whites is surely a sight to behold. Ridiculous but spectacularly so.

In a way, whites and modern folks have always craved a Common Thread because Modernity and Modernism created such a fractured world of ideas and senses. Modernism insisted that such alienating and anxious consciousness of modernism was good as the necessary price for real freedom. It laid the ground for existentialism whereby individuals must seek their own meaning. Traditional societies put forth essential truths that were meant to be embraced and valued by all. But modernism meant freedom, and that meant the clashing of so many ideas, information, idols, and icons, and therefore, it was up to the alienated and anxious individual to seek his own meaning from the constant melee. So, even as modernity was bewildering and even though modernism wasn't emotionally satisfying, they were challenging and compelling us to think for ourselves. We must all become more 'cubist' in thinking and worldview, so claimed the modernists. But, the human mind craves some kind of essence, some kind of truth that runs as a common thread through all spheres and domains of thought, feeling, and experience. Then, it's no wonder that so many people in the modern world gravitated toward Marxism that did offer a Common Thread of dialectical materialist class analysis that supposedly explained all the past and all the future through an ideology that united philosophy, science, spirituality, and meaning. But in the end, Marxism was the god that failed.

So, what is left as the Common Thread? Jews tried globo-homo, and it has had great success as everything, even Chick-Fil-A(which is now Dic*-Fill-Ass) has been globo-homo-genized, but it's really artificial, more the product of massive promotion via advertising. So many things associated with globo-homo actually have NO relation to homosexuality. Who really thinks of sodomy while sipping Coke? What does the beautiful rainbow have to do with men with wigs who plan to have their penises cut off?
In contrast, blacks are naturally dominant in sports, pop music, and sexual fetishes of whites, what with Emmanuel Macron calling on Europeans to welcome 100s of millions of blacks so that European wombs will be Africanized as white men go cucky-wuck. One would think Viktor Orban would be seen as the sane leader in Europe, but he is denounced as an 'autocratic dictator' whereas a collaborationist cuck who kowtows to Jews and blacks(and homos) is praised as what 'liberal democracy' is all about.

How about Jews as a Common Thread? After all, Jewish Money controls so much, and Holocaust Movies are now a genre unto themselves. But even as so many goyim suck up to Jewish Money and Power, Jews are loathe to make a big deal about their influence and wealth, Alan Dershowitz's chutzpah notwithstanding. As for the Holocaust Narrative, it's too depressing. Jews used to have much cultural capital as comedians, but Jews now seem almost allergic to comedy as satire has always been threatening to the dominant ruling power. Also, Jews aren't great orators(though verbally gifted), great athletes, or great singers. (Bob Dylan lucked out as he came to prominence when people still approached music intellectually and seriously.) Jews may have bigger dongs on average if Ron Jeremy is a realistic representation of Portnoic lusts, but Jewish men lack muscle power. Even if a Jewish Portnoy and Negro with equal-sized dongs stood side by side, the Negro would seem more dominant. This explains why even Jewish men are beginning to fret about all those NY Jewish women going with Negroes. Indeed, it may be the Negro sexuality that finally destroys the unity of Jews as Jewish women tend to be pretty nutty. Just like Jewish men were wildly chasing after blonde 'shikses' in the 70s and 80s, we know have Jewish women chasing after black shakas(or shaka-zulus) in the 21st century.

So, from the most secular-spiritual iconography to salacious pop cultural idolatry, there is the Common Thread of the Negro. It's telling that George Pretty Boy Floyd(or Ugly Boy Floyd as the case may be) the Knee-Groid once acted in porn and is now called a saint. In other words, St. George could be Saint George or Stud George, but in our age, the Mandela/Mandingo Complex have conflated the two. Besides, if Christianity has cucked to Queertianity and now conflates god and jesus with ass-buggery and tranny-penis-cutting, who's to say a drug-addled porn actor can't be a saint as well? To push this logic further, who's to say counterfeit money(like the one held by saint-stud George) isn't real money? If the Fed can print gazillions for Jewish Wall Street, maybe Negroes in the street should be allowed to print their own money too. Trans-money. If tranny men are 'women', let trans-money be real money. In the modern world with so little in the way of Common Thread — made all the worse by baffling Diversity — , so many people are grateful for the Common Thread of Black Celebration because it's the one thing that naturally or 'organically' exists across the cultural landscape, from high to low, to moral narratives to sensual experiences.

In other words, Welcome to Clown World.

Ben Shapiro said, 'Facts don't care about your feelings', and he's right, but therein lies the problem. Facts don't care about ANY feelings, good or bad. Facts are just cold data. A computer drive could be filled with tons of facts, but computers feel nothing. So, having facts on your side doesn't matter as long as you don't FEEL for the facts. Against the current false Narrative of Negro Martyrdom, many on the Right have been spouting off facts about black crime in the genteel manner of Jared Taylor. But those facts, even if true, are uttered without feeling. Those facts will matter ONLY IF whites invest them with feeling, with passion, with rage, with anger. It's not enough to mention that blacks commit more crime and attack and murder more whites. The fact that whites can mention such facts WITHOUT righteous rage means whites are either cold automatons or cucked maggots. When blacks are attacking your race on a daily basis, you should be angry. You should be shouting out every day, 'blacks rob our kind, blacks rape our kind, blacks murder our kind'. Whites should be saying BLM stands for 'burn, loot, and murder' as some have noted. But whites, even in the Dissident Right, are often about the facts without the feelings. Blacks attack whites but only angrily shout 'black lives matter', but whites are likely to either cuck and say 'blacks lives matter' or speak defensively and say 'all lives matter' when, if they had any balls and rage, they would say 'white lives matter', and 'we are not gonna tolerate anymore savage black violence against whites'. In other words, it's time for Race War.