Homomania or Queertianity = Satanic Jewish christianity

How Jewish Oligarchs & Commissars of Google observe Easter

How Jewish Oligarchs & Commissars of Google celebrate Homomania or Queertianity

Sometimes, what had been a great triumph for a people can turn into a matter of great shame and tragedy. When white Americans used black Africans as slaves, it was a great boon to the economy. White Americans even took pride in the act of civilizing black African savages into a people governed by law & order in a complex and advancing civilization. White people told themselves, "Those Negroes would be acting wild & crazy and dancing with gorillas IF we didn’t put them to good use as slaves in our superior order." So, white subjugation of blacks seemed like a good thing at the time. But once the Narrative changed and condemned the evil, greedy, and ‘racist’ whites for having enslaved and exploited an innately noble and superior-souled(and-bodied) people, white treatment of blacks in the past became a matter of great shame for white Americans, especially those in the South. Proud triumph turned into shameful tragedy for the white race.
Likewise, Nazi Germans were full of triumphant pride when they conquered and lorded over much of Europe. It was deemed as evidence of ‘Aryan’ superiority and awesomeness. It seemed as though the next 1000 yrs would be the ARYAN MILLENNIUM. The Germans seemed unstoppable. But then, the Soviets began to roll back Nazi gains, and eventually, the entire Nazi Empire came tumbling down. Then, everything the Nazis had done was deemed ugly, shameful, and evil. The change in reality and narrative turned Triumph into Tragedy, Pride & Prowess into Shame & Guilt.
This could also be said of Communism. There was a time when many people sincerely and passionately believed in Marxism-Leninism. They saw it as the wave of the future. They were so certain of its goodness and rightness that they believed ANY MEANS NECESSARY were justifiable to spread communism. Terror, mass imprisonment, state slavery, and mass killings were all fair game because History was on the side of Scientific Materialism of Marxism-Leninism. Communism would surely triumph and justify everything that’s been done in its name because its victory was as assured as the Sun rising in the East and setting in the West. But as communism became increasingly discredited and then finally collapsed, every triumph that had been associated with it came to be seen in a tragic light. In the Stalinist Era, it seemed as though all of Stalin’s deeds and accomplishments were awesome, superb, and morally justified. But in retrospect, Stalinism came to be associated with fear, paranoia, terror, ruthless repression, and mass killings. The once proud Red symbol of Communism came to stand for bloodbaths and rabid lunacy.
And consider the Narrative of Jews and Jesus. Jews worked with Romans to have Jesus killed and His Disciples harassed and persecuted. And when Jesus died on the Cross, Jews saw it as victory and triumph. They got rid of a heretic Jew with the blessing and support of Romans. Just like Jews today pressure goy elites to do the bidding of Jews, Jews back then pushed Romans to kill a renegade Jew. Of course, Jews today have supreme elite power whereas Jews back then were subjects of the Roman Empire. But it goes to show how even Jews-without-power have the Will-to-Pushiness that can make a great empire do their bidding. Anyway, Jews were satisfied and relieved that the dangerous Jew Jesus was killed and gotten rid of. They thought they won. But then, there arose the Narrative of Jesus as the Son of God who returned from the dead and gained entry into Heaven. As this Faith spread, what had been a triumph for Jews turned into tragedy. Jews came to be collectively blamed for the killing, indeed the murder, of the Son of God. (Jews say it was most unfair for ALL JEWS FOR ALL TIME to be blamed for the killing of Jesus, the blame for which btw has been shifted more to Romans after WWII, BUT Jews have no qualms about blaming ALL GERMANS AND ALL CHRISTIANS FOR ALL TIME for Shoah. It goes to show Jews are such hypocrites. They want to milk German Guilt and White Goy Complicity forever and ever and ever... just like the Overlook Hotel in THE SHINING wants to own the soul of Jack Torrance forever and ever and ever.) Anyway, the main point is that what had once been deemed triumphant/proud can later be regarded as tragic/shameful, and vice versa. It all depends on who controls the Narrative. Thus, any triumph/pride is vulnerable to reinterpretation that renders it as a case of tragedy/shame. (The British who used to be so proud of their Great Empire are now made to apologize for its abuses and exploitations 24/7, even tearing down symbols of past British pride in their own nation.) Likewise, what had once been deemed tragic or shameful can be re-jiggered to seem triumphant and proud. It’s like what Moses says of his staff to Ramses in the TEN COMMANDMENTS: "You gave me this staff to rule over scorpions and serpents, but God made it a rod to rule over kings." Ramses gave the stick to Moses as a beggar’s tool, but Moses wields it like the rod of God. Later, when Moses goes to receive the Commandments of God, the restless perverts among the Jews decide to go Ron-Jeremy-and-Sarah-Silverman and erect an idol of the Golden Calf to worship and celebrate. They are full of pride and riding high. But then, Moses returns and, with the power of the Lord, destroys the pride of pagan idolatry. What is ‘cool’ is made ‘fool’.

Because the Power of Narrative can turn black into white, white into black, black into white again, and white into black again, one must be careful and mindful of what he selects, blesses, and promotes with his use of Narrative. One must be sure to associate pride with what is deserving of pride. One must be sure to associate justice with what is just. One must associate beauty with what is possessed of beauty. After all, if the pride of beauty has been associated with something ugly, then it is only a matter of time before someone calls out on the discrepancy in the manner of the boy in "Emperor’s New Clothes".
But then, the power of Narrative is such that even the Worthy can be ‘discredited’ and condemned as Unworthy. Even Truth can be demeaned as False. Even real Beauty can be demeaned as Ugly. Even Tyranny can be sold as Justice. Of course, it’s more difficult to push the Bad as the Good, but the Power of Narrative and Social Conventions is such that Enough People can be fooled into believing that black-is-white. After all, how was it that all those Hindus thought it was a good idea to stick a piece of metal through their noses? And how was it that all those Chinese thought it was a good idea to ‘bind’ women’s feet? How was it that all those women in the Victorian Era thought it was a good idea to tightly strap corsets around their waists? (One thing for sure, women can be more easily goaded into doing totally stupid shit.)

We don’t need to look far to see how the Bad can easily be promoted as the Good in the Current Year. Just look at Homomania or Queertianity. It is now associated with ‘rainbow’ colors. Yes, homos(who indulge in gross fecal penetration) and trannies(who mutilate their puds and poons) get to hog all the colors of the rainbow. A symbol that had once been associated with the profound moral tale of Noah’s Ark and with the realm of the great Germanic gods is now the symbol of ‘pride’(more like poo-ride if you ask me) of Homos and Trannies. Also, what had once been called ‘gay pride’ is now just called Pride. Joining 'gay' and 'pride' is ridiculous enough as what is so pride-worthy about penises inside the anuses of men? And if trannies are so proud, whey do they go to the trouble of radically altering their hormones and bodies to be what they are not? But apparently, 'gay pride' wasn't good enough for homos. They want 'pride' to automatically mean 'gay'.
Just like homos appropriated the term ‘gay’ for themselves — ‘gay’ used to mean being light, happy, or debonair and didn’t apply ONLY to homos — , they decided to appropriate ‘pride’ for the LGBTQP — P is or Pervert-Pedophile — community or cum-unity. Talk about arrogance and megalomania. If Jews got chutzpah, homos got (poop)chutespah. An entire generation has been raised to associate the beautiful rainbow and the term ‘pride’ with homos, trannies, fecal penetration, and pud-or-poon-cutting. So, young children, upon seeing a rainbow, think ‘gay!!!’ Upon hearing the term ‘pride’, they think ‘gay!!!’ As if that isn't enough to stoke their egos, even food items are homoshered. (Jews insisted all foods to be kosherized, and now homos want all foods to be homosherized.) So, there have been homo-colored Oreo cookies. Burger King came up with ‘Pride Burger’. (Burger King might as well rename itself Bugger King.) Starbucks is always ‘pride this’ and ‘pride that’. (It might as well rename itself Starbuttfuc*s.)

And the Jews who control Facebook and Google add homo-themed doodles, symbols, and icons all over. It’s like a waiter sprinkling curry on every dish you order. Imagine you order pizza, but its sprinkled with ‘pride spice’ of curry. Suppose you order ice cream, and you get the same thing. The tutti-fruities are now a bunch of Toots who push Tootalitarianism on everything. Every TV show or popular movie must have a positive homo or tranny character. Ads feature homo ‘parents’. It used to be that every hotel room came with a Bible. Now, every social network platform, every other show, and every other product come with homo-this or homo-that. And every city is inundated with a ‘Pride’ parade that celebrates decadence and degeneracy of Jewish-financed-and-promoted globalism. But as if that isn’t enough, homos have even pushed their perversion as the new holiness into churches. And most European churches and most mainline churches in the US have complied to this insanity. According to Homomania-Queertianity, there is no higher purpose or meaning to God and Jesus than blessing homo fecal penetration and pud-and-poon-mutilation. People like Tim Cook and even the current pope(who should be called the Poop) say God blessed with certain people with homosexuality. (I suppose God also blessed pedophiles, incest-sexuals, and bestiality-practitioners with their hankerings.) According to the vain and narcissistic pseudo-theology of Queertianity, one need not make an effort to rectify and save oneself to atone before God but, instead, bend the meaning and purpose of God to bless one’s predilections, orientation, and indulgences. If Alcoholics Anonymous followed the model of Queertianity, everyone would just drink and drink in the conviction that God gave them alcoholic tendencies that must be indulged to the fullest. So, if Tim Cook spends his life by having other men ram their penises into his bunghole and ejaculate sperm to mingle with his fecal waste material, it’s because GOD blessed him with such wonders of sexual deviance. When we see homo colors take over one church after another, it should be plain-as-day that the cause of ‘gay rights’ hid something sinister: The project of instituting Homomania as Gay Rites, a neo-religion of the West. But more crucially, this was more the project of Jews than homos themselves, even though, homos and trannies, in all their bitchy and hissy megalomania, were fully onboard with this enterprise of self-apotheosis. Why did Jews feed on homo-and-tranny vanity? Because Jews have always loathed Christianity as a religion stolen from Jews by dimwit goyim. Prior to Christian conversions among goyim, God only belonged to Jews. God only favored Jews. Sure, God sometimes punished Jews because they acted badly, but God never favored goyim over Jews. But with Christianity, there was the idea that the New Covenant didn’t belong to any particular Tribe but to those of all tribes who would convert to the New Faith. What had been a well-contained and organic religion of the Jews went ‘viral’ and turned ‘cancerous’ and spread out across so much of humanity that came to not only outnumber Jews but revile Jews. (No wonder Susan Sontag called the white race the 'cancer of humanity.) After all, Christianity didn’t just claim to go beyond Jews but condemned Jews as the killers of the Son of God. Imagine that. The very people who invented the one and only God got blamed for killing His Son. Buddhism, as outgrowth of Hinduism, never attacked Hinduism in such manner. Roman mythology, as outgrowth of Greek mythology, didn’t attack the latter in such manner. But Christianity, though having arisen from Judaism, made Jews out to be the worst folks(after pagans). Then, it is no wonder that Jews welcomed the arrival of Islam that, though not exactly nice to Jews, waged war on Christendom and, at the very least, acknowledged and respected Jews as fellow People of the Book. If not for the rise of Islam, the chances are all that all of the Middle East and North Africa would have become Christian, and then Jews would have been condemned for Deicide not only by European Christians but by Arab and other kinds of Christians. (Indeed, the current forms of Christianity that remain theologically most anti-Jewish are in the Third World. Not having fully emerged into modernity, people in such nations are much more likely to accept literally whatever is written in the New Testament. So, if it says in the Good Book that Jews done it, they believe it. This is one reason why Jews loath the spread of Christianity around the world and want to replace it with something else as the hegemonic voice of the West.) If not for the creation of Israel and Zionist interests in MENA(Middle East and North Africa), World Jewry could be far more favorable to Arabs and Muslims. After all, Jews find Muslims useful in the West as such folks are far removed from political tensions between Jews and Arabs in the Middle East. Once the Muslim population is firmly ensconced in the West, Jews find them most useful as demographic and cultural armies against whites & Christians. It is only because of the Zionist vs Arab conflict that some Jews in the West see the necessity of fanning white/Christian animus against them ‘Muzzies’ and ‘ragheads’ who are featured mostly as Terrorists in Jew-run Hollywood movies and TV shows.

Anyway, Jews are riding high right now with Homomania. They are amazed and delighted with how fast it caught on in the West and even parts of the non-West. Jews know how power works. Jews know that most people are sheeple and are easily swayed by the elites. So, in order to spread Homomania around the world, Jews only needed to bribe, blackmail, or brainwash the non-Jewish elites of the academia, media, law, finance, and the state. Even if most people were to object to Homomania, the fact is they rely on mass media for information, mass entertainment for escapism & enjoyment, and mass education for their children. So, it’s only a matter of time before something like Miscegenation or Homomania is normalized among the masses. After all, the Nazi monopoly of media soon made majority of Germans supportive of Hitler. And monopoly of media in Stalin’s USSR made the majority worship Stalin as a god-man and their children grew up as fanatical communists(for whom all other ideologies were either false or evil). People are like reeds swaying in the wind. Elites control the winds, and most people-as-reeds blow in one way or another. So, there was no need for Jews to go door-to-door(like Jehovah’s Witnesses) to win the hearts and minds of individuals. They only needed to alter and reprogram the New Normal at the top/center, and then, it was only a matter of time before the majority just followed like sheep. It’s like Google doesn’t need to go door-to-door to change the programming in every computer. They only need to alter the coding in their headquarters, and then, ALL computers around the world work according to the new algorithms.
Not only do Jews understand that Elite Control is most crucial but that people are swayed less by ideas and reason than by idols/icons and sensation. After all, religions have outlasted ideologies. And Catholicism and Orthodox have outlasted Protestantism that has, for the most part, been austere and spartan, void of iconography and idolatry. Indeed, the most successful brand of Protestantism in the US is Evangelicalism that is passionate, bombastic, and rapturous. The more subdued Mainline churches have either faded away into crusty irrelevance or sought rejuvenation with homo colors. Religions outlast ideologies because of the power of the irrational-inspirational. It's like people find more meaning in astrology than in astronomy. Furthermore, ideologies that hope to survive turn into ‘idologies’ because worship and rituals are more inspiring and exciting than logic-and-thought. After all, an ideology can be called into question or discredited IF new thinkers find fault in it. But if it is worshiped as an ‘idology’ with sacred icons and rituals — as with the cult of personality around Stalin or Mao — , then the masses will likely worship it like religious folks worship God.
That said, serious ideologies and religions have one disadvantage in the Age of Entertainment. Ideologies tend to have fixed ideas(or dogma) and idols/icons. In the end, communism got boring year after year because of the same rallies, same icons(Marx, Engels, Lenin), and same slogans. What had been an object of passion and commitment became the same-old-same-old. And religions now seem boring to modern people raised on the New Normal of fads and fashions. Because certain ideas, icons, and themes are sacred in religion, they can’t be toyed with like styles and wiles of fashion industry and entertainment. In our Attention-Deficit world, people are fashion-addicts who crave Something New all the time. Granted, most of what is New is just repackaged or recycled Old, but don’t tell that to a nation of amnesiacs. They are satisfied with the semblance of the New. Even though Pop Culture and Fashion are about short-lived trends and here-today-gone-tomorrow celebrity, that very transient nature is what makes them so resilient and powerful. They are less about attachment to one dominant idea, attitude, or style than about the continual search for something New. Change is the constant,and people find it exciting.
And this is one reason why Homomania has caught on with so many people. It glows and glitters with the iconic colors of the ‘rainbow’, and every ‘Pride’ parade, like the Mardi Gras or Brazilian samba festival, offers new fashions and styles of celebration and revelry. It is especially appealing to affluent white people because Homomania in the West is implicitly white. Even though affluent yuppie types denounce White Identity and embrace Diversity, they still prefer white neighborhoods to non-white ones(especially crime-ridden black ones), and they find the blatantly anti-white rhetoric of PC and Multi-Culturalism trying at times. Most time of the year, white progs are supposed to be in apologetic mode toward non-whites. But come Homo Season, they can celebrate 'Pride' that is overwhelmingly white in expression.
But then, around the world different peoples have varying reasons for embracing Homomania. Prior to the US legalizing ‘gay marriage’, European nations, Mexico, and Canada regarded Homomania as anti-American. The so-called ‘progressives’ in those nations saw the struggle as between revolutionary support for Homosexual Rights versus Evil Christo-Fascist America that oppresses innocent blacks and pure-as-snow Homos. Especially during the Bush II years, many peoples around the world defied the US by embracing the homo agenda against Evangelical Crusader Bush. They thought they were being anti-American. (Because the US is so ahead in science, technology, military power, and pop-cultural capital, other nations hope to best the US in something, and the cheapest & easiest way to appear 'more evolved' is by embracing whatever that's deemed to be the latest in progressive thought.) They were blind, often willfully, to the fact that the Real Rulers of the US are Jewish globalists who’ve been the main funders of Homomania around the world. (While homosexual culture and struggle for homosexual rights didn’t originate in the US or even with Jews, Homomania-as-a-neo-religion is essentially the baby of Jewish-American Globalists.) Amusingly enough, all those anti-American progs around the world who opposed and defied American Power by embracing Homomania were actually dupes and tools of the Real American Power held by Jews. Indeed, Bush II was also a tool of Jewish Globalists who cynically manipulated patriotism and Christian-Zionism to maneuver Bush into waging these Wars for Israel. As they say, Follow the Money. The money trail in the US and EU(and elsewhere) leads to Jewish control of both ‘conservatives’ and ‘liberals’. Whether one is ‘anti-liberal’ or ‘anti-conservative’ in the US, it all boils down to ‘We love Jews more’ and ‘We support Israel more’.

With 80% of sheeple Americans now supporting ‘gay marriage’ and shedding tears(or wetting their pants) over Holy Homo nonsense, surely Jews are confident that they’ve succeeded in replacing the much dreaded-and-reviled(among Jews) Christianity with the new faith of Homomania or Queertianity. After all, in the new US, you will never lose your job or get in trouble for mocking Jesus, Mary, or Disciples. (The most famous person named ‘madonna’ is a skanky pop star whose second act in a mostly sordid career was the worship of the black dong.) But if you say anything that is critical of homos & trannies and their chosen lifestyles, you are shrilly condemned for ‘homophobia’, ‘transphobia’, ‘hate’, ‘intolerance’, ‘exclusion’, ‘bigotry’, and hounded, fired, & blacklisted. (The only reason the stupid Negress Joy Reid survived despite her critical posts about homos in her past blog is because she is black, which makes her a holy person: The Holy Three are Jews, Homos, and Negroes.) Now, even many ‘conservatives’ are onboard in condemning anyone who has unkind words for stuff like homo fecal penetration or tranny penis-cutting. As Jews command the top of the food-chain in the US, there’s a trickle-down effect that shapes all of society. Just like Jews in pre-Emancipation Europe couldn’t enter into certain professions or careers as Jews and had to convert to Christianity to gain fuller access, there is little chance of anyone today making the socio-economic climb into spheres of privilege UNLESS he or she professes enthusiasm for Homomania. One must be ‘born-again’ into Homomania if not raised with Homomania from cradle. All politicians in big cities must show up at Homo ‘pride’ parades just like everyone-who-was-anyone had to take part in Communist parades in the Soviet Union. Jews find Homomania more useful than Zionism in gaining mastery over goyim. While AIPAC, ADL and other Zionist organizations do their best to pressure all members of American political and economic elites to support Israel, the problem is it sends a message to Americans and the World that Jews Control Everything and that All Politicians & Businessmen are Whores of Jews(if not Jewish themselves). Even though Jews relish their supremacist power, they are nervous about people noticing that Jews got Too Much Power. So, Jews use Homomania as a front and proxy for Jewish Power. As Jews are the main funders of Homomania(that also has powerful Jewish homos and trannies), Homo Power is essentially Jewish Power. It’s like Neoconservatism isn’t explicitly Jewish and has prominent non-Jews among its members, but it is essentially a Zionist-supremacist ideology. Now, if anti-Jewish forces were to take control of Homomania and use it to attack Jewish power and Zionism, Jews may have a change of heart. But Jews have created, shaped, and controlled Homomania from the beginning. It is so closely entwined with Jewish power that it is as crytpo-Jewish as Neconservatism and Tory Party of UK(that is sometimes called the Torah Party). There have been attempts by some people, including Jewish homos like Glenn Greenwald, to re-jigger Homomania as a weapon against Jewish power and Zionism. So, there are images of Palestinian Homos waving the homo flag in opposition to Israel tyranny. Or some in the BLM wave the homo flag and denounce Israeli policy as Apartheid. But those are anomalies than the norm. The fact is Homomania was, is, and will be a Jewish Baby. Also, if Christianity was the Baby of heretical Jews who were rejected by the Core Jewish Community, Homomania has been approved and embraced by the Core. Jews love it because Homomania tells the overwhelming majority of straight people to bow down at the altar of Homo Elite Minority Privilege. This dynamic complements the idea that the vast majority of non-Jews should revere and serve the Jewish Supremacist Minority Elites. In other words, Jews love Homomania because its Elite-Minoritarian outlook parallels Jewish minority-elite-supremacism. The fact that so many people haven’t yet figured this out goes to show what total morons and dummies most sheeple are.

At any rate, Jews are feeling so awesome and powerful because they managed to replace Christianity with Homomania. After all, the Jewish-globalist-supremacists Google ignore Easter every year but go all out to promote, celebrate, and ‘iconize’ Homomania. Again, this isn’t merely for ‘gay rights’ but for Gay Rites, an effort to elevate Homomania as the new-religion of the West and the World, which is why Jews even push the madness on Latin America, Asia, and Africa. In their ambition at least, Homomaniacs are like early Christians who weren’t merely asking for religious freedom and tolerance BUT eyeing to one day take over the Roman Empire, spread the faith to everyone, and smash all competing faiths and practices of paganism. Early Christians weren’t satisfied with something as humdrum as ‘Christian rights’ to be left alone to worship as they please. They were absolutely convinced that their Faith was the only true Faith, must prevail over the empire, and wage total war on all false idols and rituals. When Christians didn’t destroy or remove pagan temples or iconography, they took them over and remolded them to serve and represent Christianity. In the same way, Homomaniacs are now taking over Christian churches and reinterpreting the Faith to be about God and Jesus blessing holy homos. Likewise, when Muslim Turks took over Constantinople, they didn’t smash all Christian churches and symbols. They took over some of them and remade them into Mosques in honor of Allah and Muhammad.
Homos and trannies should never have been trusted in the realm of power because, by their innate nature, they are excessively vain, narcissistic, hissy, bitchy, sneering-and-sniveling, and whoopee-pee-poo. Indeed, homos must make an extra, indeed herculean, effort to boost their pride and confidence because what they do is so obviously foul and ewwww. I mean, what good thing can one say about homo fecal penetration, let alone stuff like ‘fisting’? That's some ‘gay’ shit. There is even less pride about a guy wanting to have his penis and balls removed to get a fake vagina. Because there is no natural pride to such behavior, homos and trannies must go all out and shoot themselves with artificial-pride-as-emotional-steroids to feel so good about themselves. Indeed, it takes some chutzpah or (poop)chutespah to claim the term ‘pride’ to be synonymous with homos having their asses rammed with penises or trannies having their puds or poons mutilated to get fake genitals. But then, this total weirdness may paradoxically be quasi-spiritually appealing to so many globalist proggy types. Though too educated and secular to literally believe in God and miracles, they nevertheless have some spiritual longing encoded in their DNA. They long for miracles in a world without miracles. So, when they see some man ‘magically’ transform into a 'woman' or vice versa, it's like a secular version of the modern-day miracle.

Jewish Globalist Supremacist may be celebrating their great victory, but things can easily turn against them. How is this possible, you may ask? After all, both the non-Jewish elites and the great majority of the masses are for ‘gay marriage’ and onboard with Homomania. Even Christian churches have bent over to take it up the ass with homo colors. All Democratic politicians worship Homomania, many Republican politicians endorse it, and even those who haven’t converted to the Homo faith dare not oppose it openly. Among politicians, it is well-known that Homomania is a Jewish proxy, and therefore, opposing Homomania means infuriating Jews. It’d be like a US politician favoring Palestinians over Zionist imperialists. Despite the Constitutional concept of Separation of Church and State, the fact is the current US is a deeply quasi-theological in its practice of power. The cult of MLK, the Shoah, and Homomania are essentially State Religions. They aren't matters of individual conscience or personal creed. They must be embraced and worshiped by anyone who wishes to make it in government or succeed in business, law, academia, or media. And their Narratives must be accepted at Face Value. They cannot be questioned or argued with. Did 6 million die in the Shoah and were Jews totally guiltless throughout history? You better believe it... or else you are a ‘Denier’ and ‘antisemitic Nazi’. Did white people have absolutely NO legitimate reason for discrimination against blacks even though blacks are naturally more muscular, tougher, and more aggressive? Yes, you better believe it or else you are ‘racist’ who has no place in America. And you better believe that MLK, the degenerate pervert thug, was not only a saint but a figure greater than God and Jesus. And you better believe that Homos are the new angels, miraculous creatures of joy and wonder. If you disagree, you are a ‘homophobe’. The mindless sacraments for these favored groups and the enforcement of taboos against free discussion concerning them suggests that there is a quasi-religious aura that surrounds them. Therefore, in order for the US to truly separate State from Church, we need to promote open discussion and argument about all historical, racial, demographic, and sexual issues. We must not take anything at Face Value for mindless reverence and worship.

Even though something deemed Sacred has greater power than something deemed secular, it is paradoxically more vulnerable for that very reason. At first glance, the Sacred appears shrouded with divinity and protected by taboos. In contrast, a secular item can be freely debated and called into question by skeptics and rationalists. A secular item is always vulnerable to new critiques and analysis. In contrast, the Sacred cannot be touched or questioned. Those who dare do so can be attacked and destroyed as ‘heretical’ or ‘blasphemous’, the PC versions of which are ‘racist’, ‘antisemitic’, or ‘homophobic’. But because the Sacred is so highly regarded, when it begins to lose its luster and iconic status, it fails and falls faster than any secular idea. A secular position can be weakened by reasoned argument but also supported by counter-argument. Thus, there can be a back-and-forth see-sawing between opposing sides. In contrast, once a Sacred Something has been dethroned, it loses its value immediately. It’s like once you know the trick behind the magic, you will never be wowed again. And once you realize that a certain preacher used deception to fool the flock with pseudo-miracles, he can never regain your trust. Or, suppose some guy claims to have magic powers in Martial Arts. Instead of having demonstrated his real ability in the secular arena of the ring, there is an aura around him akin to the Force around Yoda and other Jedi Knights. For those who’ve fallen under the so-called Master’s spell, he might seem invincible and awesome. But all it takes is one real fight to expose him as a fraud, and then his star falls totally and permanently. Sacred cows can become bullshit almost overnight.



Even though Jewish Globalist supremacists and Homomaniacs say they ‘won’ the ‘debate’ and the ‘culture war’, they did nothing of the kind. Jewish ethno-monopoly of the Media only promoted one side while defaming the Other wide as akin to the demented Westboro church. Also, instead of putting forth real ideas and reasoned debates, Jews used the power of icons like ‘rainbow’ homo colors, manipulative ads, and TV shows(and movies and music videos) that idolized homos and then even trannies as a specially blessed people. As Joe Biden said, the acceptance of ‘gay marriage’ had less to do with debate than Mass Media propaganda made possible by Jewish ethno-monopoly of the Media. Of course, Joe Biden blurted this out in total admiration and praise of Jews — he claimed "It was all for the good" — , but he did spill the beans on the extent of Jewish power in the West. Jews, with their ethno-monopoly of media and so much else, can fool masses of dummies and sheeple into believing anything. Of course, what Joe Biden doesn’t mention is the use of gangster-and-bullying tactics as well. Jewish strategy, like that of homos, has always been passive/aggressive. Jews pretend to be nice and pleading for their agenda, but it’s an offer you can’t refuse. If you say NO, Jews will set out to destroy you. So, you better support Israel 100% and you better worship Homomania because, if you don’t, the entire Judeo-Globo-Homo media complex will come after you, like what happened to Carrie Prejean when she said NO to ‘gay marriage’. GET WITH THE PROGRAM, GOY... OR ELSE!!

And Jewish control of finance will cut off funds and loans unless you bend over to Zionism and Homomania. And even non-Jewish and non-Homo companies will, either out of fear or true conviction(as Homomania is the most sacred neo-religion for many cucky-wuck stupid and shallow people), fire you if you defy Homomania. In summation, Jews and Homos didn’t win a clean honest debate to win the ‘culture war’ but cheated, used smoke-and-mirrors tactics, and threatened people with dire consequences if they were to resist. Imagine you’re a boxer preparing for a fight. But while the promoters make your opponent out to be cool and wonderful, you are made to be a lowlife thug scumbag. And then, you get a message that if you fight back against your opponent for real, you will be financially destroyed and your house will be burned down. And then, the referee allows your opponent to do anything, even low-blows and eye-gouging, while you are penalized for having done nothing wrong. You have no choice but to take a dive. THAT is how Homomania won in the arena of US culture & politics officiated by vile Jewish supremacist a**holes as corrupt promoters and referees. Likewise, Zionism never won a honest debate in the US. Anyone who looks at the facts would have to admit Palestinians got a raw deal, were terribly wronged, and continue to live under humiliation. But notice all US politicians support Israel. Even when Israel pummels Gaza and kills women and children, the entire Congress pledges to support Israel and stand with Israel. There is NOTHING about Palestinians and their plight. So, what Jews did to Palestinians and their supporters in the US, they did the same to sane, decent, and moral people who stood firm and said NO to Homomania. It's often been said that Jews won so much of the Culture War because of their superior verbal intelligence, but that's not the main reason. It had more to do with Jews controlling the media, rigging the perimeters of permissible discourse, using loaded terms like 'antisemitic' and 'homophobic', and underhandedly threatening financial ruin on their opponents. Edward Said had high verbal intelligence, but how often was he featured on the MSM? No matter how intelligently and factually you expose Zionist lies and terrorism, the Rigged Narrative and Terminology will brand you an 'anti-Semite' and ban you from 'respectable' and 'acceptable' discourse. Of course, Jews themselves can push any nonsense they wish, like the hysteria about Russia Hacking the 2016 election. Many in the Alt Right could easily defeat Neocons and their ilk in open debates, but they are shut out of media and college lecture tours because their views have been deemed by Jewish supremacist power as 'unacceptable' and 'toxic'. There are plenty of BDS people, some of them Jews, who could take on any Zionist in a debate, but they are virtually shut out of MSM and banned from certain colleges. Trying to be heard in an honest and open battle of ideas is now as difficult as it was for Jake Lamotta to secure a title shot in a sports so overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish gangsters and the mafia. The Jewish ducks(who duck honest fights and debates) will only allow cucks. American Discourses is mostly about Jewish ducks and goy cucks.


And yet, precisely because Jews and Homos won so unfairly, their sacred cows are so easy to call bullshit on. The Zionist Narrative on the Israel-Palestinian conflict is now unraveling so fast that Jewish Power has to push its whore-politicians to criminalize and shut down BDS. But doing so will only embolden more critics of Israel to come forth and say Enough Is Enough. Indeed, even many young Jews are calling BS on what is being done to Palestinians. Especially as the Internet is a great equalizer and has given Palestinians and their advocates a platform to get their messages across, the bogus Sacred Cow of Zionist-Hegemonism is eroding. Sure, Jews still have immense power and monopoly of so-called ‘mainstream media’ and internet platforms, but it’s difficult to play whack-a-mole with so many opposing voices. Youtube and Facebook, both Jewish-owned, work closely with Zionist organizations like ADL and SPLC(funded mainly by Jews) to deny voice to anti-Zionist voices, but there are Too Many now. And things are getting so bad in Gaza that the Sikh whore Nikki Haley(who sucks Zionist cock 24/7 and swallows) is finding it ever harder to bully or bribe other nations to kiss Israeli ass.

Precisely because false beliefs have no basis in fact or evidence, they have to be sanctified with fake holiness, protected by taboos, and promoted with mindless hysteria. As such, they may seem invincible for awhile, but they've been waxed with the sheen of invulnerability precisely because they are so vulnerable. Consider the sudden fall of Ceausescu in Romania. He was a total hack with no special talent or vision. He even had a speech impediment, especially problematic for a leader. So, he created a ridiculous cult of personality around himself and his wife. And for awhile, he seemed to ride high, and the masses seem to worship him. But once it became obvious that he was a phony, the cult around him rang hollow, and his fall was total and brutal. This is why the fatso in North Korea is afraid of real change. As his just a third-rate fat-boy, the only claim to power is the aura around his dynasty. Once that goes, people will laugh him as Boy Pig, and his fall can be swift and brutal. Even estimable leaders with genuine ability & talent — Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and etc. — needed to surround themselves with the cult of greatness to hold sway over the masses during trying times. Even so, when they began to believe in their own myths, they brought about disasters like WWII or the Great Leap Forward. And even Stalin, who weathered the storms, defeated Germany, and was admired around the world as a great statesman, soon became a near non-person in the very nation he'd built a few years after his death. By the late 1950s, Stalin was hardly featured in Soviet iconography centered around Marx and Lenin. Whatever Stalin’s achievements(some of which were great), the fact is the cult-of-personality around him went far beyond reality, decency, and proportionality. Therefore, his overblown iconic status had to be deflated and shelved in order for the Soviet Union to be a normal nation with real expectations.

Today, the Holy Three of the West are Jews-with-Shoah, Blacks-with-MLK-cult, and Homos-as-angels. Because of the quasi-religious aura and sanctimony around them, they seem invulnerable. But that very advantage is their fatal weakness. After all, spiritual aura, especially around secular entities, is not based on anything real or provable. While it’s true that Shoah happened, there is nothing in history or reality that says a people are forever-holy-and-innocent because of a horrible tragedy that befell them in a particular place and time. This is true of Jews and blacks. It is ridiculous to judge all their past existences and future destinies in relation to Shoah or Atlantic Slave Trade(or Jim Crow that was hardly one of the great injustices in world history). As for Homomania, it is a total joke, a pure fabrication by the utterly corrupt and degenerate Jew-run media.
At any rate, decent, sane and sober people must not approach the Holy Three as matters for secular debate but as false-religions that need to be exposed and false-idols that must be toppled. It is totally irrational and insane to assume that because Jews suffered Shoah, they were always pure & innocent and shall be wise & noble indefinitely no matter what they do. As for blacks, the fact is they were brutal savages for 100,000s of yrs before they were brought to the New World. And even though slavery had its ugly and dark side, the main reason for black problem is not history but biology, or BAMMAMA: Blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. We need to prick the bubble of Black Holiness that would have us believe blacks would have Wakandas all over the world if not for ‘evil racist honkey’. And MLK, though an important figure in an important social movement, was no saint but a punk, boor, and thug in reality. As for Homomania, it’s some bogus neo-Golden-Calf mass cult that fools us into thinking homosexuality is mainly about ‘rainbow’ colors than gross fecal penetration among men. It is putrid and demented, the product of mindless hype pushed by Jew-run media, entertainment, and finance. We need to approach the Holy Three like we approach Televangelists, false preachers, charlatans, cults(like Scientology), and other nonsense.

Even though I’ve never been religious and don’t believe in God or Satan, I would still say Homomania is satanic. Even if Satan doesn’t literally exist, certain things are so sick, demented, vile, and disgusting that they might as well be the work of the Devil if he existed. And even though I’m not a Christian, I’m deeply offended when Homo degenerates befoul a Christian church with homo colors or mock a Buddhist site with their putrid air of contempt. One doesn’t have to be a believer to acknowledge or admire the great visions and deep values those religions stand for. There is a reason why Christianity and Buddhism resonated so deeply with so many people for so long. And same can be said for Judaism and Islam(albeit to a lesser extent perhaps). It really takes a satanic mindset to associate those faiths with Worship of Holy Homo. Only a sick soul would drape a Christian church with colors associated with homo fecal penetration, bathhouse follies, or tranny penis-cutting. Only twisted ultra-narcissistic deviants could take Ass-selfies in front a monument to Buddha.

Never mind the Ugly American. In the Age of Homomania, we have the Butt-Fugly American. These homo degenerates' idea of appreciating culture and spirituality is to take Ass-selfies in front of Buddhist Temples. But what do you expect from homo tourists from a nation that now drapes churches with homo colors and practices Gay Rites as the highest expression of sanctimony?

Jews think they are winning with Homomania. They think they are digging for the ultimate gold to control the world with a neo-religion of their own making. But they could be digging their own grave because it will be a matter of time before people wake up to the fact that Homomania is really Satanic-Jewish-christianity or SJC. Once the scales begin to fall from the eyes of the people who realize that they’ve been duped, messed up, and mocked by vile, disgusting, and sinister Jewish globalist supremacists, they will begin to wake up fast and reject the false religion of Homomania. The fall of Homomania will be like the fate of Humpty-Dumpty or Ceausescu cult. It can never be put together again. When Jesus died on the Cross, it seemed like the end of Him and His movement. But what He’d stood for and preached was so deep, profound, and moving(even if impossible) that a great Narrative could be spun from it and proselytized as a great religion. And it is why Christianity has lasted for so long and even survived communism. But the foundation of Homomania is total nonsense and filth.
Now, the homo struggle in the form of ‘gay rights’ was legitimate to the extent that it’s a fact that some people are born homo, and it is not their fault for being what they are and in having deviant sexual preferences. So, it only seemed right not to treat homos as ‘mentally sick’ individuals to be banned from jobs and housing. But once homos and then even trannies were promoted as saints and angels whose lifestyles are akin to the miracle of the rainbow and deserving of mass ‘pride’ parades, society went the way of Sodom-and-Gomorrah. And then, when the meaning of marriage, the most important institution of humanity, was desecrated to appease homos and to conflate the homo fecal penetration & tranny penis-cutting with the real sexuality of men and women that produce the miracle of life, the West became a sick and evil civilization. And then, when people’s lives were ruined financially and/or professionally because they refused to comply with Homomaniacal decrees, like baking ‘gay wedding cakes’, the homos and their Jewish globalist supremacists revealed their true face of utter wickedness. And then, when homo colors were even pushed into churches, only the stupid and retarded can keep with the BS that homo agenda is a secular and rational program. If so, why are homos even targeting churches for takeover? No, the fact is Homomania is a satanic Jewish agenda to replace Christianity, a true and great religion, with a false religion of their own making. It’s like THE OMEN series where Satan produces a counter-messiah to take over the world. One doesn’t have to be religious to see the utter wickedness of Jewish Globalist Supremacists. Not all Jews are onboard with this craziness, but unfortunately, the majority of them are, just like, at one time, majority of Germans supported the psychopath Hitler.
Jews did this. They did it to humanity, civilization, morality, and spirituality. It is a great evil. Jews are dancing with joy in victory and triumph, but a false religion cannot last for long. It’s only a matter of time before it is outed and exposed. And we need to speak out and tell the world that Homomania = Satanic Jewish christianity, i.e. Jewish attempt to replace Christianity(or any other great religion or philosophy like Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, or Confucianism) with a cynically concocted Global Cult of their making. Whenever we discuss Homomania, we must mention that it is not a secular movement but a neo-religion, and we must state loud-and-clear that it is the creation of Jewish radicals, Jewish globalists, and Jewish financiers. Make Jews own the filth they foisted upon the world. Tell the people of every nation that IF they cuck out to Homomania, they are effectively bending over to be fuc*ed in the ass by Jewish Globalist supremacism. No people who respect their own tradition, culture, heritage, and forefathers could do such a thing to their own nation. When pressured by Jews to embrace Homomania, people must stand firm, look straight in the eyes of Jewish supremacism, and say "I don't worship Homomania. I have my own religion or value system, and if I pay respect to anything, it is the line of my ancestors who bequeathed a rich and meaningful culture to me and my people."

We need to expose the true nature of the Homo Agenda, connect it to the Jewish globalist enablers, and then tell the whole world. Once peoples around the world come to realize that Homomania is the latest instrument of Zionist-American cultural imperialism and pseudo-spiritual crusade, the tide will turn.
And once all these idiotic Millennials realize that their lives, sensibilities, and morals have been compromised and degraded by kneeling before the altar of the Homo as the holiest icon and highest value in the world, they will crave real answers and real truth. And it is then that the Truth — Homomania = Satanic Jewish christianity — will hit them like a bolt of lightning, and they will reach for true meaning and justice.

Paradox of how the More Spiritually Pure Protestant North became More Materialist than the More Idolatrous Catholic South that became More Materialistic — Roots of Protestant Productivity

What follows is just a theory and may have been expounded by others earlier. It seeks an explanation as to why the Protestant North became more Materialist(as opposed to Materialistic) even though Protestantism placed greater emphasis on one’s pure-hearted spiritual connection with God. One would think that Protestants, in their rejection of Catholic privilege, corruption, and excessive worldly power, would have devoted most of their energies to prayer, meditation, and being nearer to God.
Instead, Northern European Protestant nations made leaps & bounds and startling breakthroughs in Materialist science, technology, industry, and wealth that, for a time(and even to this day), left the Catholic South in the dust. It is also worth asking why the Catholic South, though less Materialist in their thinking, produced a culture that tended to be more Materialistic, meaning infatuated with material displays of wealth, privilege, and power: Glitter, luxury, and opulence.

Perhaps, the main divide between Catholicism(which retained much of the idolatry of Greco-Roman paganism) and Protestantism(which sought a purist and personal re-connection with core truths of Jesus) is in their respective reaction to ‘relicism’, iconography, and ‘idolism’(a restrained form of idolatry that, at least in theory, treats certain objects as symbols than literally sacred objects). In the pagan worldview, all things are imbued with spirits. In primitive animism, even rocks, trees, and streams are alive with strange powers and energies. So, it was common for primitive tribes to wear bear claws or lion fangs OR wrap themselves in snake skins or crocodile hide. The idea was that the ‘magical’ power of the fearsome beast would be transmitted to the warrior-hunter. This basic idea even continued in high civilizations like Hindu India and Taoist China. Hindus have an elaborate system of the meanings and significance of so many objects and animals. And many Chinese still believe that the some essence of rhinos, tigers, or bears will transfer to them by partaking, respectively, of their horns, penises, or paws. The Ancient Romans tore into an animal and examined its innards in a ritual to prophesy the future. To pagan Romans, the guts of a goat or sheep wasn’t just some gunky stuff. The innards held divine portents of future yet to be. And among the Vikings, there were sorcerers who portended the future by toying with a turtle shell and pieces of bones. Certain objects were deemed sacred... or evil.

Among the Chinese, there developed a ‘superstitious’ system of real-estate assessment and building-design. For good luck, housing plans could not violate Feng Shui. In the movie JEREMIAH JOHNSON, an American Indian tribe reacts vengefully upon discovering white folks trespassed over their sacred burial grounds. All such mindsets blend spirituality with materiality. Actual things and/or animals are said to be possessed of magical powers or cursed with diabolical forces. Therefore, one must be careful in one’s interaction with the world. You must treat sacred things accordingly and avoid(or attempt) to destroy evil things. In such a worldview, spirituality and Satanism aren’t merely matters of the soul but interwoven with certain tangible things all around us. This mentality could apply to humans as well. According to Judaism, one must reject idols and devote oneself to the one and only God who cannot be represented or manifested materially. And yet, Judaism connects God’s blessing with the Jewish pud(and now the Jewesses are trying to shift the neo-covenant from the Pudkin theory to a Pooterin one). So, the Jewish schlong isn’t just a fleshy appendage but an organ favored by God Himself. Thus, spirituality is combined with Jewish blood(and semen). And according to the story of Eden, all the world was a miracle imbued with the spirit of God, especially the Tree of Forbidden Knowledge. But Adam and Eve dared to listen to the Serpent and ate from the Sacred Tree. As punishment, God’s blessing was removed from the material world. Godliness no longer existed in tangible flesh and things but only as traces in the redemptive souls of man... though the one caveat was the Jewish pud, at least if properly circumcised by a Rabbi.

Christianity did away with the Jewish Pudkin Theology and went further in locating God’s essence in the soul than in any part of the flesh. To the extent that every individual has a soul that can choose either spirituality or satanism, the hope lay in the cleansing and redemption of one’s heart and mind. And yet, Christianity also combined spirituality with tangibility to the extent that God was manifested in the human form of His Son Jesus. Also, the ritual of baptism, apparently predating Christianity because, after all, John the Baptist was splashing people around before Jesus came to him. Thus, water, under certain circumstances, wasn’t just water but a soul-purifying agent.

If most great pagan civilizations believed in anything, it was monumentalism. Egyptians built massive pyramids. Babylonians also had their massive works of architecture, as did the Persians. Greeks had theirs too though on a less grandiose scale. Romans were famous builders. It was as if all these civilizations believed that massive structures weren’t only products of power but preservers of power. To live in the proximity of or, better yet, within the walls of architectural grandeur meant that your people were the most powerful. We see the Hollywood Egyptians in Cecil B. DeMille's TEN COMMANDMENTS erect one giant monument after another. Many of them served no useful purpose. Indeed, it’s difficult to think of anything more useless than Egyptian pyramids that required many thousands of workers over decades. All that tremendous amount of energy were exerted to build what were essentially nothing but tombs for dead kings. Whatever one may say of the Great Wall of China, it was built to fend off invaders. (To be sure, their purpose was also symbolic, as if to say, "On THIS side, there are the noble and civilized Chinese, and on THAT side, there are these useless barbarian hordes who must be kept out lest they contaminate our glorious civilization.") In contrast, Egyptian pyramids seem to us like vanity projects gone bonkers. And yet, they made sense to the Egyptian pharaohs and masses who built them because the kings were deemed to carry and transfer, generation after generation, the souls of eternal gods; therefore, the pyramids weren’t merely tombs of the dead but the sanctuaries of divine souls whose spirit and wisdom still governed Egypt in strange and wonderful ways. Egyptians valued pyramids as houses of god-souls like bees value the role of the queen bee within the hive.
Greeks weren’t as ostentatious as the Egyptians, but they too built huge temples to their gods, and both elite and ordinary Greeks offered sacrifices and made entreaties to them. At one time, Persia, with its awesome architecture, was regarded as the greatest and most powerful civilization on earth.

In a world where imperialism was the prevailing mode of power relations among all peoples, a civilization could not hope to rely on fixed boundaries. Boundaries were always shifting, like the line-of-scrimmage in football. So, your civilization could, one year, hold sway over huge swathes of territory, but then, a few years later, hold just one-third of the former size. Since a tribe or civilization couldn’t rely on boundaries for permanence, its best bet for displaying its might was to erect huge monuments and structures of stone, indeed ones so massive that it’d be difficult even for successful invading armies to tear down. I mean, who would want to spend a decade dismantling a pyramid? Also, the sheer magnificence of the structures may seduce the invaders into assimilating into the defeated culture. So, even as the native people may have been defeated, the invaders may, in turn, be culturally ‘defeated’ and won over by the magnificence on display. Instead of totally smashing the civilization, they may pay tribute to it and fall under its sway. Thus, Alexander the Great of Macedon, though conqueror of Egypt and Persia, respected and adopted some of their ways. Various non-Egyptians who invaded Egypt took on the roles of Pharaohs and kept much of the culture intact. Many Mongols were absorbed into Chinese civilization with its impressive structures. And even though Romans defeated the Greeks militarily, the Greeks conquered the Romans culturally. And even though the Germanic barbarians conquered Rome, their later kings aspired to be like the Roman Caesars and dreamed of creating their own Romes. And much of the Renaissance was inspired by the tangible artworks and architecture of the ancient pagans.

In more recent times, there was Ayn Rand’s zealous and quasi-mythological obsession with skyscrapers. And Adolf Hitler wanted German ‘Aryan’ might to be represented and secured by a massive building project in what would be the future city of Germania. And many developing nations became fixated with erecting taller and bigger buildings, not so much for utility or enterprise but as symbols of wealth, success, and relevance.
And Vladimir Putin’s Russia has embarked on a massive building project of new Russian Orthodox Churches. In the West, so as to flatter Negro ego that they are also great builders, at least in the realm of blinged-out fantasy, we’ve had the massive hype about Wakanda that is powered by ‘vibranium’. On that note, monumentalism has its uses and advantages.



But they also have their weaknesses and dangers. For one thing, many civilizations expended tremendous energies toward building things that had no practical value. While certain structures served as protective castles(the early brutalist architecture), fortresses, or walls, many were just white-elephant vanity projects. One wonders if the civilization would have done better to direct its energies toward more productive and useful endeavors. Also, the people of a civilization can develop an idolatrous faith in monumental grandeur, i.e. because they are surrounded by massive and mighty structures, they must be a powerful people. But as any sports team knows, having a gigantic hometown stadium doesn’t ensure victory. A university with modest buildings but with good professors and smart motivated students will do much better than a university with spectacular buildings but with bad professors and lazy-stupid-moronic students.

Too many peoples in history fell under idolatrous spell of monumentalism. Because Rome had awesome buildings, too many Romans got to feeling invincible. Because Chinese built palaces and monuments to symbolize China as the Middle Kingdom, the center of the universe, they grew overly complacent when faced with foreign enemies, especially in the early 19th century when the haughty and arrogant Manchu-Chinese felt they had little to worry from the West because, after all, the center of Chinese power in Peking was such a magnificent place, especially the Forbidden City. It was assumed that foreign devils would forever be forbidden from China, and the Chinese subjects would forever be forbidden from the Forbidden City. Such complacency proved to be fatal. It was also ironic because, after all, the Manchu dynasty on the throne was foreign in origin.

While monuments and awesome displays of power do signify some measure of power — after all, a totally useless society couldn’t build such things and have massive armies — , those who fixate on them overlook the deeper and more substantive sources of power. National Socialist Germany did have a sound basis of power in industry & technology, manpower & work ethic, and military & armaments. But Hitler overestimated German power because the massive displays of might at the rallies and marches created the mythic impression of German invincibility. Indeed, when we look at some of the footage of Nazi rallies, it makes us wonder how any force on earth could withstand German power. And when the initial battles proved to be in Germany’s favor, Hitler gambled everything on conquering Russia as well. While German power, like Ancient Roman power, was seriously real and far from illusory, it had its limits. But Hitler threw caution to the winds because, like so many pagans before him, he thought the gods had chosen him to be the man-of-destiny. Today, Russia puts on massive military parades bigger and more spectacular than anything in the US, but in fact, Russian economy is smaller than that of Italy and even Texas. North Korea puts on some of the biggest military parades annually, but its economy is 1/40th that of South Korea’s. The US spends many times more on its military and has many more jets and naval power than Russia. Also, given the immense depth of its economy, the US on war-footing could assemble a power 20x more powerful than that of Russia. Still, it would be foolish for the US to engage Russia on its home turf. Russia has sufficient manpower and immense natural resources to fend off most invasions. And despite US advantages, the American Public will not support anything like a invasive war on Russia that will surely lead to tons of US casualties as well.
Anyway, while monumentalism and spectacle-ism have their uses, one must never conflate the show with actual power. Body Builders and Professional Wrestlers are very good at showing off their muscles and acting tough, but virtually none of them is not a top-tier athlete in competitive sports. If anything, they tend to be rejects who failed at sports like football.

The reason as to why Northern Europe eventually surpassed and achieved so much more than Southern Europe(that got a head-start in civilization) has many explanations. Some might argue that the greater diversity due to invasive pressures made Southern Europe less cohesive and united. While Northern Europe also used to be overrun by invasions, civilized and barbarian, most of marauders were fellow light-skinned whites. So, Danes invading England and the English invading Ireland were all examples of all-in-the-family. Over time, such peoples could assimilate and become One people, hardly distinguishable from another unless one listened carefully to their accents. As such, most Northern Europeans remained remarkably similar in looks and temperament.
In contrast, Southern Europe wasn’t only invaded by other whites but, at times, by non-whites or Caucasian-non-Europeans(or the conquering Southern Europeans brought as slaves, merchants, or mercenaries non-whites from abroad). Much of the Balkans came under Ottoman rule. Turks ranged from whites to Semites to Central Asian folks. Much of Spain and parts of southern Italy once came under the domination of Moors, even some ghastly blackamoors who deigned to demand, "Where the white women at?" But even long before that, Greeks and Romans were constantly in contact with non-Europeans. Romans even imported slaves from Middle East and Africa. Some black Africans fought as gladiators and, as prized victors, even humped elite Roman women who had jungle fever. It is then not surprising that some Italians, especially in the South, look more like Arabs or North Africans than like Northern Europeans. And many swarthy Greeks look more like Turks or Arabs than light-skinned Europeans in England or Sweden. Given that Arabs and Africans may have lower IQ than Europeans, it meant race-mixing led to decreased intelligence among Southern Europeans. But even putting IQ aside, a people that have been invaded and inter-racially altered by invasions tend to lose a sense of unity of identity and purpose. This explains why multi-racial-caste societies like India and Latin America are so confused and messy. Many Mexicans don’t know if they’re white or indigenous. If Southern Europe got invaded at times by Arabs and Turks, Eastern Europe(especially Russia) was conquered by Mongols and other Asiatics. Even though Russian folks eventually regrouped and expelled the foreigners(and even conquered, in turn, their territories), the messy interaction with non-Europeans led to confused politics and history.
Things were even more problematic in Byzantine civilization that totally disintegrated and vanished from history. At the very least, Russia had a solid core Slavic population, culture, and territory. In contrast, Byzantine Empire was, from conception to demise, a patchwork mosaic of various ethnic groups that were united only by the cultural theme of Greco-Roman glory. But many of these peoples and their rulers were neither Roman nor Greek. An empire composed of peoples without a solid ethnic core, the politics degenerated into intrigues and led to dissipation. Much the same problem beset the Ottoman Empire where Turks dominated militarily but other groups dominated much else, especially in commerce. In contrast to all those empires beset with problems of Diversititis, Northern Europe was securer and more homogeneous, and it was more likely for a culture of conscience, trust, and honor to develop there. Anyway, historians and sociologists surely have many explanations as to the Great Divergence between the North and South in Europe, a phenomenon that has dogged Europe to this day.

Now, let’s consider another factor that may have led to the materialist rise of the North. The famous Max Weber argued that Protestant Work Ethic was a key factor in the industrial rise of the North. Protestantism may have also imbued Northerners with a clarity lacking among Catholics who became mired in monumentalism and idolatry. Because of the syncretism of paganism and Christianity, the Catholic-Southern tendency was to be overly impressed with things deemed miraculous, sacred, beautiful, and monumental. Such were not only aesthetically pleasing to the eyes but the very embodiment of greatness, awesomeness, power, and glory. It was the Building and the Bible, the Look and the Book. Vatican was filled with magnificent structures and huge collections of priceless art, therefore it must be the center of world power. The French became intoxicated with building wonderful things, like the palaces at Versailles. Surely a power housed in such architectural wonders had the blessing of God Himself. The Catholic immersion in rituals(involving various sacred objects) performed in grandiose buildings may have affected the way Catholics regarded political power and economics. After all, in Catholicism it wasn’t enough for you to have faith, no matter how sincere you were. To receive God’s grace, one had to go through an elaborate rigamarole of sacraments and rites. Relics might be involved too, and you believed in miracles manifesting themselves in the physical world, such as tears streaming down a Madonna statue or finding the face of Jesus on a morning toast. Such a mindset may have affected the Catholic conception of power and wealth as well. Thus, the Look of Power could have led to the overestimation of power. Style and facade could be mistaken for substance. In THE GODFATHER, neither Michael, Carlo, nor anyone else is particularly spiritual, but the baptism scene in the Church creates the impression of a culture steeped in religiosity, tradition, and morality. And yet, it is just an outer-shell that houses an emptiness and even elements of what some might call ‘satanism’.

This mentality also existed among aristocrats who, for the most part, preferred the Catholic realm to the Protestant one. After all, the Catholic penchant for pageantry complemented the aristocratic flair for ostentatious vanity. Excessive aesthetic narcissism was bound to be less approved in Protestant social orders where the prevailing cultural mode was to favor the spirit of the Book over the sparkling Look. And yet, aristocrats and quasi-aristocrats everywhere had a tendency toward fanciful displays of status and privilege. Talent and wealth were not enough. One had to have the right kind of look. So, the quasi-aristocrats of the American South were far more conscious of their looks, manners, and styles than the more buttoned-down bourgeois elites of the North. Because Southern elites were less restrained in displaying their wealth and privilege as a form of stagecraft, they could easily overestimate their power because they looked so good, especially in relation to the more utilitarian North. And yet, real power is a matter of substance and numbers, not style and aura. The fact is the North had many more people and a far bigger industrial base. Also, most of the new manpower in the form of European immigrants were entering the North. Imagine two sports teams. One not only has a powerful lineup but great depth in reserve players who can take over when the starters are exhausted. But their uniforms are plain, and they do NOT LOOK very impressive. In contrast, the other team has a solid starting line up but no depth in reserve players. But they are dressed in flashy uniforms that make them look so amazing. Now, which team will likely win? Despite marketing hype, wearing Air Jordans doesn't make you a Michael Jordan. It is indeed telling that, over the years, military uniforms got less & less ornamental and more & more utilitarian until the modern soldiers were dressed and fitted only with practicality & efficiency as considerations. But for much of human history, there was great emphasis on the LOOK of power. Were those plumes on top of Greek and Roman helmets really useful? Did wearing feathered-wings serve any real purpose among the Polish Hussars on horseback?

Why did so many militaries throughout history don or equip themselves with appendages that had no clear use in battle. Indeed, such ancillary fittings could very well be an hindrance. While an Ancient Greek helmet looks nice with stuff on top, it is simply added target for the enemy who could mess up the helmet by taking a swipe at what is on top of it. And on gusty days, the winged gear on a Polish hussar would created more wind resistance. And in close quarter-fighting, it would be something an opponent could grab to pull the hussar to the ground. But for much of human history, wars were monopolized by kings and aristocrats than by entire peoples and nations and, as such, were far more limited affairs, often more like sports games than full-on total war, the aim of which was to totally crush and vanquish an enemy. The vanity of the aristocrats to look impressive and their code of honor created and sustained an agreed upon set of formalities. Aristocrats regarded themselves as having ‘evolved’ and elevated from the brutish ways of their barbarian ancestors who fought more like beasts than men. And as long as the aristocratic order prevailed, warfare could be managed as elaborate rites with the usual fanfare. But the rise of industry and big guns, the formation of mass national armies(far bigger than anything in the age of aristocracy), and the nature of conflict as Total War changed all the dynamics of warfare.
It’s telling that, even up to World War I, German soldiers still had spikes on their helmets. But then, World War I was the last great war of the aristocrats, indeed the great war that brought down all aristocratic orders.

Anyway, a Catholic is more likely to be impressed by the looks of things because his religious practice combined spirituality and materiality, i.e. certain things, big or small, are thought to glow with the aura of power and magic. So, if a Cathedral is to be built, immense amounts of energy and wealth must be devoted to make it look as good as possible. And it wasn’t enough to be rich. One had to show off one’s wealth in ostentatious display, like with those haciendas in Latin America. Quite often, a richer Protestant German or Anglo-American might live in a house that was more modest than the giant mansion of a Catholic oligarch in Spain or Latin America(or, for that matter, a Russian aristocratic prior to the Bolshevik Revolution). To the naked eye, it could easily appear as thought the Latin or Russian guy is richer and more powerful than the German or Anglo guys, but that is seeing the suit than the wallet. Both Catholicism and Russian Orthodox encouraged a mental habit that favored Look-keeping than Book-keeping. Consider the ridiculous figures of Evita Peron and Imelda Marcos who were more obsessed with national image than national industry. But among Latinos, it wasn’t just the women but the men too.

In more recent times, Vladimir Putin, though sensible on many matters, wasted too much time and energy on White Elephant projects like the Sochi Winter Olympics. And even though it’s a good thing for Russia to revive its traditions and build more Orthodox Churches, that won’t change the fact that Russia continues to be woefully underachieving despite its population and land mass with bountiful resources.

In contrast, Protestantism purged from the Northern soul the endless fascination with the magical aura of things. There was no need for Protestants to obsess over sacred relics. And religious rituals were pared down to a minimum. And most churches were designed to be basic and spartan. The purpose of a church was not to feature nice-looking things but to emphasize the need for devotion and prayer to God. Thus de-sacralized in mind and senses, Northern Protestants were bound to take a harder and colder look at the material world. Their perceptions became more utilitarian and practical. In the end, what mattered was, "What can this or that do?" So, even though a cathedral or a palace in a Catholic kingdom was far more impressive than a factory in Manchester, it was the latter that build cannons, ships, and trains whereas cathedrals and palaces, like the Egyptian Pyramids, served no worldly purpose. Over time, Northern Protestants became more materialist in their thinking, i.e. they had a more empirical, rational, practical, and technological relation with the world around them. And yet, being more materialist made them less materialistic. Having a cold-eyed and rational view of the world means valuing materials as things than as treasures.
Catholics and Orthodox Christians believe in the ‘miraculous’ value of things. So, a certain relic isn’t just some thing but a sacred object glowing with mysterious divine force. Consider the mysticism that shrouds a certain house in a placed called the Zone in Andrei Tarkovsky’s STALKER. While believing in miracles is a spiritual idea, it can easily be transferred to the material world. Even on the secular level, someone whose mental habits and sensual inclinations are steeped in the Catholic way of thinking-and-feeling is likely to be more enamored of the glittery glamour of precious items like jewelry, fancy dress, expensive cars, and luxurious mansions. The Catholicist mind, having been inculcated into seeing certain things as sacred and miraculous, is more likely to be enticed by the razzle-dazzle of precious objects. It is more likely to be into the celebration of ‘bling’. And such mentality still dogs so much of Latin America where a person or thing is more likely to be judged by his/its image than by his/its real substance. This made them more materialistic.

The appeal of Marxism to many Latin-American intellectuals may have owed to a subconscious sense on their part that the Latin soul must be reformed of Catholicist idolatry. Thus, Marxism was like a secular Protestant Reformation movement for Spanish and Latin American intellectuals. And yet, there was also a Catholicist appeal to communism, especially after the Soviet Union transformed the ideology from a spartan movement for worker justice to a grandiloquent crusade with new gods, prophets, saints, sacraments, rituals, and pageantry. Even as communist nations stressed the simple life and virtue of hard work, they spent exorbitant sums to put on massive displays that made the Catholic Church blush. Indeed, at the very end of the Soviet Union, the two things it still had left were massive spectacles and a program to win lots of ‘blings’ at the Olympics. Impressive as a white elephant but dead as an economic elephant. And to this day, Russia pays too much attention to image, symbolism, and monuments than to the real factors that lead to greatest development in science, technology, and industry. Russia will host World Cup Soccer in 2018. More wasteful expenditure on what amounts to little more than White Elephant Dung.

In contrast to Catholicism and Orthodoxy, Protestantism had little use for relics, icons, displays, pageantry, rites & rituals, and spectacles. This made Protestantism a duller religion to the eye. But by de-sanctifying objects and materiality, a purer form of spirituality was possible. Piety and faith in Protestantism didn’t rely on one’s communion or interaction with tangible objects deemed holy. Granted, there developed several sects(or denominations) of Protestantism, and some were rather close to Catholicism in practice. Still, the essence of Protestantism was a return to the spiritual essence of Jesus’ teachings divorced from paganesque idolatry(the result of syncretism of Christianity with Roman paganism and even elements of Germanic paganism) and the institutionalized power of Church bureaucracy manned, especially at the top, by clergy with close associations with the rich and powerful(like the Medicis or the fictional Corleones). With Catholics, wine and wafers(bread-like crackers) could be the blood and body of Jesus Himself. Holy Water, when sprinkled on a demon-possessed girl, could make her cuss and vomit. Catholic women held onto Rosaries like security blankets. Entire buildings could be blessed or sacred. Among Orthodox folks, possessing a certain icon was like having a prized baseball card worth big bucks. Poles have a thing for the Black Madonna(not to be confused with mudshark madonna), one of the most sacred objects for them both historically and spiritually.
In contrast, Protestant denominations had either far less need or no need at all for such ‘trifles’ that were either considered to be distracting or condemned as idolatrous superstition.

It is understandable why Protestantism caught on more in the North than in the South. Not only was Martin Luther a German but the North had a meager legacy in High Paganism. In ancient times, paganism in the South meant the awesome achievements of Greco-Roman civilization, whereas paganism in the North meant fur-clad ruffians drinking mead, sharing wash-basins, and acting like Conan the Barbarian. So, Catholicism was proud to develop as a fusion of High Paganism and High Spirituality. The North, lacking such a rich pagan legacy, was bound to feel envious. This isn’t to say Martin Luther and his followers weren’t sincere in their moral dissent against the Church, but it couldn’t have been an accident that Protestantism spread most fervently among the Germanic folks. Being poor in cultural legacy vis-a-vis the European South, they sought compensation via greater purity in spiritual devotion. After all, the spirit is the great equalizer. As Jesus said, a poor man who is good of heart is richer in spirit than the richest man who is weak in faith.

The result of Protestantism was a devaluing of the sacredness of objects. So, one shouldn’t seek sacred value in things, buildings, and possessions. Spirituality could only be found through the heart. It was a matter of the soul. Thus, the world, having been detached from spirituality, could be seen with a clearer, more empirical, pair of eyes. A thing was just that thing than some ‘blessed’ or ‘cursed’ object. (Perhaps, a latent force in English Romanticism was a neo-quasi-Catholicist vision of the world as filled with sacredness in enraged reaction to the Industrial Revolution set off by empirical use of science, technology, and economics.) In Andrei Tarkovksy’s Orthodox worldview, even dead things can be imbued with the ‘miracle’. Even if Tarkovsky didn’t literally believe in hocus-pocus, his way of seeing the world was steeped in the Orthodox view of the world of God’s creation and the latent paganist view of Mother Russia. So, even though THE SACRIFICE is set in Protestant or post-religious Sweden, it is characterized by a Slavicist world-view of salvation-redemption-reclamation through faith not only in God but in the sanctity of things. The final image is of a child who waters a dead tree in the hope that it will come to life. Of course, it’s impossible, and Tarkovsky knew it himself, but there’s a sense that without such hopes and dreams, mankind is lost, surrounded by objects devoid of spirit. (This idea was transposed, ridiculously I think, to BLADE RUNNER 2049 where we are supposed to believe that android Rachel underwent some kind of ‘miracle’ in giving birth to a kibbler, LOL.) In Tarkovsky’s penultimate film NOSTALGHIA, his alter ego, a Russian expatriate in Italy, clearly feels more at home near Church ruins and with a madman than with modernity and modern people. The lost world of Catholic structures and traditions reminds the main character of Mother Russia, parts of which managed to survive materialist communism. But capitalism is materialist too, and the Russian expatriate cannot relate to the ‘liberated’ Italian woman who serves as his guide. Modernity reveres nothing but the instant demands of the self. He later encounters a madman who, though clearly unbalanced and even dangerous, is touched by a moral-spiritual vision beyond the material and sensual wants of day-to-day existence. To Tarkovsky, the threat of Nuclear War wasn’t only about countless lives lost, ruined environment, and fallen economies. It is an act of crime against God, against all that is holy. It's an extension of his take on the mind-planet(or soul-planet) in SOLARIS. It is seen as a heavenly repository of memories, dreams, remorse, and longing that make up the human soul. Therefore, it must be left alone than intruded upon and 'abused' by science-and-technology in search for ‘material’ truth.



While there is great beauty in the Catholicist and Orthodox vision(albeit more subdued and somber) of the sacredness of things of the world and the world itself, it is a form of mega-idolatry in affixing spirituality to materiality. If spirit is beyond body and things, why should it be so powerfully manifested in tangible things, especially when the Genesis speaks of the Original Sin and the fall of Eden? And didn’t Jesus stress the heart above all else? He wasn’t impressed by palaces, fancy dress, arts & culture, and monuments. He didn’t much care for Jewish rites and rituals. (One wonders if Judaism would have developed into something closer to Catholicism — a syncretism of idolatrous paganism and spiritualist faith — IF the Jews had been allowed to remain in Jerusalem. Herod, a collaborationist overlord with the pagan Romans, was a great builder who spent lavishly on making the Jewish World resemble something like the Vatican or Mecca. But Jews were soon thereafter driven into exile, and their religion could survive only as a matter of blood, spirit, and word. In a way, they had to become more Protestant-like. Their wealth had to be conceived of as a kind of 'spirit' of financial matter, as free-flowing currency.) Nor did Jesus think less of others because of dress, wealth, status, or health. According to Christianity, the ugliest, most wretched, and most foul-looking creature is nobler than the most beautiful, richest, and reputable(by prevailing social standards) person IF the former is devoted to God and Truth while the latter is obsessed with one’s own fame & fortune. So, the spirit is not to be judged by body, material forms, and adornments.
Spirit is also deeper than the Word that could be used charlatans and Devil himself. After all, the Serpent used words to entice Eve into eating from the Tree of the Forbidden Knowledge. While God communicates His message through words to the Prophets, truth is deeper than words. (Also, as God grows more silent in the later passages of the Bible, His voice/words aren't so much to be heard through the ears than discovered from the wellspring of the soul.) It’s like Socrates warned against pseudo-philosophers who are clever in their use of words but devoid of integrity and meaning. Thus, there is a sense in Protestantism that the deepest prayer is not about songs/music or spoken prayers but silence itself. Though Martin Scoresese’s THE SILENCE is based on a novel by a Japanese Catholic author Endo Shusaku, it’s interesting that the protagonist finds a deeper truth in the dark silence so far removed from the comfort zone of Catholic Spain. While in Spain, every Church, every hymn, every prayer, every ritual, and every sermon assured the priest of the rightness of God and Jesus. It is away from such comfort zone that the priest is confronted with the possibility of either the absence of God or the weakness of his faith(or the uselessness of his faith to do any good for the suffering Converts). He went from a world where Christian Godliness is a symphony filling up every square inch of space to a world of Silence where the Faith is concerned. Silence can mean absence but can also suggest the need to dig deeper until a well is struck and the water starts to flow once again.

Protestantism has a better grasp of the significance of this Silence because, ideally speaking, a Protestant is not to be distracted by the physical manifestations of holiness, which are to be rejected as forms of idolatry. And some Protestant sects were even distrustful of music as overly sensual — the Taliban would have agreed — and recited their hymns in rhythmic verse than in song. In BABETTE’S FEAST, we see the muted clash of cultures between the French woman who can cook up a feast for the senses AND a small Danish Protestant community that is accustomed to a spartan & stoic existence(though to be sure, the contrast is also between urban and rural). Babette is a contradiction of sorts. She’s sympathetic to the Revolutionaries, but her talent in the culinary arts is downright royal-aristocratic. (In a way, the French Revolution had themes similar to Luther’s rebellion against the overly corrupt and ostentatious Catholic Church. Especially Robespierre was quasi-Protestant in his puritanical insistence and radical commitment to the Revolution. As a movement that would bring about justice for common folks, his revolution was against the entirety of Catholicist-Aristocratic tradition that had brought forth so much glory and beauty[as well as pomposity and arrogance] to French Culture.) Babette is a refugee from the Counter-Revolution that restored the haute privileges of the French aristocracy that made possible the fancy cooking she specializes in. After all, your average French peasant or worker for most of history never ate fancy French cooking, no more than an average Chinaman ate Mandarin dishes fit for an emperor. To stay on the straight and narrow path, one must not only direct one’s gaze at the true prize — spiritual union with God — but be mindful not to fall into temptation of worldly pleasures that makes people value the temporal over the eternal.

Protestantism’s insistence on purity and simplicity in the practice of Faith had wider cultural ramifications. A spiritual-moral culture that disdained glitter-n-glamour in religious expression was bound to affect all spheres of life, especially as religion was the moral core of traditional European culture. Thus, keeping things moderate, modest, and restrained in strict adherence to the true spirit of the God and Jesus was bound to favor things that were less colorful and flavorful in art & architecture, dress & design, music & dance, and food & wine.
Given this reality, one might think the Catholic societies would have spearheaded the economic explosion that came to be known as the Industrial Revolution. After all, if Protestant sensibility is about moderation and self-denial, why would there be a need to produce more and more goods? After all, the Spartan economy was smaller than that of the Athenian economy that was far less restrained in goods and services. Athenians loved to trade and sought out ever greater trade routes. Athenians loved to create, possess, and display glorious and beautiful things. Spartans interacted with non-Spartans only to the extent that it was necessary to maintain Spartan power and local hegemony.

If Catholics were less restrained than Protestants in their taste for glamour-n-glitter(so opulently on display in the Catholic Church), wouldn’t such a culture of ‘avarice’ and ostentation have kicked off a culture of mass consumption? After all, whenever Latin folks, whether in Europe or South America, got a bit of cash, they were far less hesitant to spend it on food, clothing, jewelry, and etc. Latin America was far less developed than North America, but the Latin American rich loved to make a big show of their wealth and privilege, like the Sosa character in SCARFACE. Or consider the crass Evita Peron.

Perhaps part of Che Guevara’s appeal was he was such a severe and spartan figure among the Latins. In a way, Marxism-Leninism was a secular Protestantism for the Latins. The modern world was too ‘enlightened’ for religious faith, and so, the educated reformers and radicals no longer put their faith in God. As such, it would have made little sense for them to convert to Protestantism to combat the entrenched corrupt system of the alliance among the monarchy, oligarchy, and the Catholic clergy. So, what was there as a purifying fire? Marxism-Leninism that called for the renunciation of wealth and privilege in the name of Justice for the Salt of the Earth. Granted, Catholic Church had long emphasized the need to take care of the poor, but the have-nots were regarded with condescension. Also, the idea was that the poor should not complain, remain meek, and hope for charity from the Church funded by crumbs from the corrupt rich. So, why not eradicate all that with the Revolutionary Fire?

The fact that Mussolini won in Italy and Franco won in Spain(and the fact that most of Latin America was ruled by right-wing oligarchs and quasi-fascists) suggests that the Latin character generally favors flavor and flamboyance over sparse and spartan commitment to truth & justice. And even Fidel Castro, despite his communist victory in Cuba, borrowed a style that was closer to Mussolini than Lenin or Stalin. Also, the ‘left’ that finally triumphed in Spain was Homomania, a neo-religion that even outdid the Catholic Church in pageantry and spectacle. The face of Spanish ‘progress’ has been what? The movies of Pedro Almodovar. Well, whoopity poopity-doo.


And what accounted for the success of Hugo Chavez? He didn’t call for more sacrifice and hard work, as Che Guevara had done. Instead, flush with oil money, he promised festival-para-todos. And it wasn’t long before Che Guevara was turned into an icon for every kind of ‘bling’. Che’s severe spartanism — he thought the North Korean model that marched people to and from work was the ‘most impressive’ — suggests that he was well-aware that the Latin Way had failed in contrast to the Yanqui Way. Of course, his Latin pride was loathe to admit that it had less to do with Northern exploitation of the South(in Europe and Americas) than with different modes of thought, values, and behavior. Still, he obviously felt that something radical was necessary in order to defend and develop Latin America independent of Yanqui imperialist meddling. And he thought the answer lay in what he called Moral Incentive, his own version of the Protestant Work Ethic. If an entire people devoted themselves to self-sacrificing hard work for the common good, they could catch up to the capitalist West and spread their model as the ideal one for all the world. But what Che Guevara, along with so many leftist radicals, failed to understand was that the success of the Anglo-Germanic North had to do with a strange combination of Self-Denial and Individual Ambition. This blend wasn’t easy to come by because it necessitated the melding of two conflicting and seemingly incompatible thought systems. After all, Protestantism stressed, far more than Catholicism, the virtue of the simple life, self-restraint & self-denial, moderation, and thrift. But how could such virtues ever lead to much wealth? For one thing, it led to a culture of higher conscience that led to a culture of greater trust that was an advantage to contracts and business. Also, the focus on virtue meant a stronger will to do a good job. Just as one had to serve God with purity of heart, one had to apply one’s skills to work with conscientiousness. This did wonders for productivity(which must precede consumption, as in the ant-and-grasshopper story). Moderation meant less likelihood of revelry and other self-destructive behaviors that could blow away one’s earnings or lead to dissipation that gnaws away at Work Ethic. Thrift also meant saving more for a rainy day than spending for here-and-now(and this necessitated access to foreign markets as the domestic market remained suppressed by the ideal of thrift and self-discipline, surely one reason why the Brits were eager to sell opium to the Chinese but not to their own kind). Also, the notion that one’s relation to God was essentially direct and personal was bound to have a liberating effect on the individual. If faith is a matter of individual conscience than of institutional dogma, then one could stand taller before God. Obviously, the Protestant North didn’t plan any of these outcomes, but they did result from ‘accidental’ intersections and interactions of various, often clashing, outlooks and modes of thought.

But it is possible that the economic rise of the North also owed to the de-mystification of the material world as the result of Protestant influence. Under such conditions, people are more likely to take a cold and hard-nosed look at reality. Indeed, consider Italy and UK in the 1920s and 1930s. Great Britain was far more powerful than Fascist Italy, but Mussolini put on a good show to impress the world. He acted as if the Roman Empire was back when, in fact, Italy was a paper tiger that, when push came to shove, couldn’t even defeat Greece. The humiliated Italians had to be bailed out by Germans who did the invasion of Greeks and then pretended the Italians were lords over Greece. Fascist Italy was not the Roman Order that had once easily conquer its neighbors. But why were so many Italians so willing to fall for Mussolini’s grand delusion and swindle? Why was Mussolini himself so prone to fall for his own myths? Why did the later Fellini coast on his stale razzle-dazzle phantasmagoria to prop up the myth of his genius that had all but faded? Amusingly enough, JULIET OF THE SPIRITS is everything that it attacks. It mocks Catholic Church’s culture of hyperbole & hysterics that instilled innocent young girls with sexual complexes, but the entire film is a shameless ritual of props and stagecraft as substitute for art and meaning. Likewise, FELLINI SATYRICON’s condemnation of the excesses of pagan Roma could just as easily apply to Fellini himself who had, by then, become the absurd Nero among film-makers. For a more sincere delving into truth, there were the Swedish greats Ingmar Bergman and Jan Troell. To many people, Bergman may be most well-known for FANNY AND ALEXANDER, his most Fellini-esque film, but his artistic reputation rests on the stark b/w films of the 50s and 60s. And it’s difficult to think of a more honest film-maker than Troell who worked on his films like a wood-carver with a log, sure and steady. Granted, Catholic Italy also produced neo-realism, Roberto Rossellini, and Ermano Olmi. And Robert Bresson the French Catholic made some of the most stylistically austere films ever, as different from Fellini, Bertolucci, Leone, and Ophuls(Jewish) as the films of Carl Dreyer are. Still, one can help but notice certain general tendencies among cultural sensibilities. It seems fitting that Fellini was Italian than Swedish and Bergman was Swedish than Italian.

Does any of this matter anymore in our globalized world where all of Europe seems to be coming under the mono-culture of Judeo-Afro-Homo domination? Is there a culture of Work Ethic anymore in Great Britain where too many young people act like loutish boors and feel no shame about getting drunk and falling all over the streets? Is there any meaningful difference between the French and Americans when most French kids grow up listening to Rap and watching Hollywood movies? Do blacks in France conform to French culture or to globalized American culture where the only things that matter are Jewish chutzpah, Negro muscle & music, and homo vanity & narcissism? With the ongoing Africanization of Sweden, a nation already remade by demented feminism, homomania, and cuckery, would it make sense to even speak of a distinct Swedishness in decades to come, especially when many Swedish elites insist there is no such thing as ‘Swedish Culture’ and appoint idiotic non-Swedes to be caretakers of national heritage? Maybe not, but the lingering differences between the European North and European South can still be traced back to the contrasting cultural legacies(as well as genetic factors as Southern Europe tends to be mixed partly with North African and/or Near Eastern blood AND as Eastern Europe tends to be mixed more with Turkic and/or Asiatic blood). Of course, Europe a hundred years from now could be a very different place given current demographic trends. Most of Western Europe, from top to bottom, could become like a big version of Morocco. Eastern Europe might avoid such fate if it holds onto its current nationalist mode, but even Eastern Europe fails to understand that the biggest threat comes not from the Muslim world but from the black African world. But because of PC that lionizes blacks as Special Victims(along with Jews and homos), there is a rhetorical reluctance to address the issue of saving Europe from ghastly ‘groids’. After all, while it’s still permissible in the globalist media to speak ill of Muslims, raising alarms about blacks is akin to ‘antisemitism’ or 'homophobia'. It is Taboo. Furthermore, due to American cultural hegemony(which is basically Jewish, Homo, and Negro), many people in Eastern Europe sincerely have an overly romanticized and favorable impression of blacks as both the most Noble Race and the Coolest race. So, even as Poles make big noise about defending their nation from Muslims, they go out of their way to prove that they are ‘progressive’, ‘tolerant’, ‘anti-racist’, and onboard with ‘Western Values’ by welcoming and celebrating ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. THAT could be the undoing of Poland. Because Jews control the media, Narrative, and Idolatry-Iconography, they get to decide which groups are most protected by taboos and most blessed with secular sacraments.

Anyway, the Protestant North, with its de-mystified view of the world, was bound to focus more on real work and real wealth. Since the world around them could not be prized as magical or miraculous, it could only be assessed in material terms. A factory had material value in producing stuff. And stuff had material value as weapons, ships, trains, and machines. In the end, it was Prussian hardware that overwhelmed Austro-Hungarian grandeur. The Austrians had nice palaces and cathedrals. To the naked eye, the Austrian world would have seemed more awesome. But when it came down to actual battles, victory was decided by better soldiers, better discipline, better weapons, and better transport. Material Substance always wins over Magical Style.

Protestantism allowed for higher conscience of mind and harder concentration of matter. The Protestant mind tended to be less ‘superstitious’, less bound to matters of style. It was more matter-of-fact and cold-eyed in the assessment of power and value. The Chinese and Hindus were also slower to modernize because their world-views were wrapped up in magic, mysticism, and ‘superstition’. Hindus literally believed in the existence of a million gods that animated the universe; they believed that all of life was governed by this force called Karma. And for the Chinese, the idea of Tao was not just a metaphor but a real forced that maintained balance in the world. And they believed that the rulers of China, with the Mandate of Heaven, were divinely ordained to sustain the harmony in what they considered to the Middle Kingdom. With such magical force favoring China, there was no way that a bunch of Anglos, seen as a race of pirates, could do anything real to harm China. But then, there was a series of rude awakenings. Because the Chinese/Manchu elites were secluded in their own la-la-land inside the Forbidden City, they’d developed a habit of favoring fantasy over reality like Elvis Presley in Graceland and Michael Jackson in Neverland. So, how did such an elite deluded with so much mysticism manage to rule over such a vast imperial kingdom for so long? Because the fantasy was shared by a vast bureaucracy and also by the masses of minions whose social habits and emotional tendency were toward servility, conformity, and superstition. Collective fantasy buttressed elite fantasy. It appears some peoples/cultures are more prone to fantasy. Consider the Magic Realism of Latin American writers and film-makers like Guillermo Del Toro(that vile piece of turdez).

So, there were obvious advantages to being part of the Northern Protestant order. Indeed, even much of Russian modernization and industrialization in the late 19th century and early 20th century owed to German engineers, managers, and military personnel. As for France, its fate increasingly became sandwiched between Protestant UK and Protestant Germany that fast outpaced France in heavy industry.
And in the New World, the Protestant North America outshone Catholic Latin America in almost every respect. (Perhaps, certain Latin American nations held their own at least in literature.) For the Northerners, spirituality belonged to the realm of soul whereas materiality belonged to the world of matter. There was less confusion on such matters as the two realms was segregated in a kind of mental caste system. If you wanted Salvation and Redemption, you prayed with your soul to God. If you wanted to make it in the material world, you needed to make real empirical discoveries, build things of genuine utility, or accumulate real wealth backed by legal contracts. There was little room for hocus-pocus ‘superstition’ that confused materiality with spirituality.

Granted, this didn’t necessarily mean a lack of imagination, as the British excelled in literature and fantasy genre. But the magical and mythical were reserved for the world of fiction. They were understood to be imaginary. At best, they could be poetic or visionary, but they were still not real. Then, it is understandable why the two greatest movements of 19th century Romanticism happened in Protestant UK and Protestant Germany. Protestants were hungrier to find the magical and mythical in art, fiction, and music because their spirit world remained locked within the soul. Because the material world wasn’t imbued with magic or miracles in the Protestant world-view(as it was in the Catholic world), things had value in terms of utility and cause-and-effect. But the human mind craves for the mythic and fantastic, and for the Protestant-minded folks, such could only be imagined via the realm of fiction. Even as Protestant imagination could be expansive, there was a clear boundary between fact and fiction.
In contrast, the Catholic world-view was more ‘magic-realist’, radiant with faith in miracles in the material world all around us. Thus, if vision in the eyes of a Protestant meant a leap of imagination or insight, it could mean a divine revelation to the naked eye of a Catholic. And this made the Catholics more ‘superstitious’ and less rational on the actual worth of things. Suppose there is a sword made of inferior metal that isn’t of much use in battle BUT it’s been said to be sacred. The cult of miraculous-matter will blind the Catholic to the real (lack of)value of the sword. It’s like Alec Guinness’s character of King Feisal in LAWRENCE OF ARABIA would rather dream of the lost gardens of Cordoba and hope for miracles.


One may argue that the Protestant de-consecration(later to be followed by the secular form of Deconstruction) of the world led to horrible abuses and exploitation as the world was no longer seen as sacred. Even though the idea of the fallen state of the world is intrinsic to the entirety of the Biblical text, there was nevertheless a modicum of miraculousness in the Jewish and Catholic view of the tangible world, even if, paradoxically enough, for opposite reasons. The strict Jewish prohibition against idolatry and worship of graven images implies that Jews regarded God’s Creation to be so special and unique that it shouldn’t be ‘mocked’ by the creative hubris & vanity of man. In other words, don’t think Creativity can ever come near Creation. In contrast, Catholics grew attached to the miraculousness of the world by way of syncretizing Christianity with pagan idolatry. To be a Catholic means to revere the rites and rituals performed with the aid of certain holy vessels.

Unlike Jews and Catholics, Protestant world-view was barren of the miraculous(though it may also have owed to Northern Temperament shaped by long stretches of cold weather, long dark winters that seem to last forever, and overcast clouds and mist). It was not a place to pep up one’s spirits. As such, one could argue that the Protestants were less mindful of the damage they did to nature and the social order. Everything was measured in terms of utility and material advantage.
And yet, the magical view of the world could also have a dark side. Consider Jewish hatred of pigs and Muslim hatred of dogs. If some things in the world could be sacred, other things could be cursed or wicked. Because Muslims have such a negative view of dogs, they treat man's best friend most terribly. And because Ultra-Orthodox Jews regard pigs as not only physically unclean but spiritually polluted, they fail to appreciate the wondrousness of pigs as our brothers and sisters.
After all, God Himself could create the world to be a holy place or set out to destroy it as a cursed place. If the world is seen magically, it could be seen as one of the ‘good witch’ or the ‘wicked witch’, as the Land of Oz. So, while magical thinking can make one better appreciate things of the world, it can also make one hate them more as well. If certain items can be considered holy and pure, other items can be considered wicked and evil. Snakes were surely a big loser in the Biblical Sweepstakes. Because of the Serpent’s role in the story of Eden, many Jews and Christians came to regard snakes as a wicked animal that should be killed at first sight. Also, magical thinking can transfer from the spiritual to the material. Think of the Conquistadores who sought out El Dorado as the City of Gold or the Fountain of Youth in the New World. Men steeped in Catholicist magical thinking sought out heaven-on-earth, as if indeed there might really be a city where streets are paved with gold or a place with water that serve man’s vanity to be forever young. So, even as a magical view of the world can allow for greater appreciation, it can also foster a superstitious outlook that can lead to loathing of so much as wicked, satanic, or cursed. After all, if a thing can be blessed by good spirits, so can it be cursed by evil spirits. And the Catholic World had more of a superstitious view of the world, and this often hampered clarity of thought necessary for rational interaction with reality.
Also, people who tend to believe in magical-materiality are prone to focus more on possession than usage. For instance, if you believe you possess a magic sword, you may be less motivated in learning how to use it. You will more likely to safeguard it in the belief that the mere ownership of the weapon empowers you and your side. But as Uther and Arthur learn in EXCALIBUR, mere ownership isn’t sufficient to be a good ruler. It’s all about why, when, and how it is used. The Japanese, with their myth of a sacred island nation protected by gods of wind and water, failed to rationally assess the danger of picking a fight with the US with a bigger population and far greater material resources(and advanced technology). Protestantism, by de-consecrating materiality, stressed the greater importance on the mastery over materiality. It wasn’t enough to own something. It was about how it can be used according to the cold hard facts of laws of physics.

At any rate, both the Catholic and Protestant worlds have lost their faith and are now under the spell of neo-pagan idolatry of Pop Culture, Homomania, and Diversity-Propaganda(aka ‘More Restaurants’, that is until the foreigners who bring new restaurants to your nation come to eventually devour your nation as feast for demographic imperialism). There is no longer any clarity in the minds of Protestants.
Also, Pop Culture has gone from being entertainment to new myths and neo-religions. Due to movies like GREEN MILE and SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION, there is a sense among many white folks that blacks are a sacred race, the chosen of god if not god hisself. And Oprah is like a black madonna to countless soulless moron women. Whenever someone, black or non-black, wants to sound holy-schmoly, they recite a quote from Maya Angelou or Toni Morrison(like Old Time Bible Thumpers used to recite quotes from the Bible to validate their positions). And MLK, who really should be remembered as Fartin Poother Bling, is now bigger than God. And Mandela is the holiest figure in all of Europe. And so many whites fainted left and right at the sight of Obama as The One in the 2008 election cycle.
When white folks, Catholic or Protestant, are not worshiping Negroes, they are just wild about homos and trannies. For these morally and spiritually bankrupt dufuses, the great moral theme of our age is making sure that homos get to ‘marry’ and have bakers make a ‘wedding cake’ for them. And of course, Jews, via control of media, academia, and whore politicians in governments all across Europe, have elevated themselves to a bunch of little jesuses of the Holocaust Cult. Worship the Jews, adore Anne Frank as the new madonna, build more and more Holocaust monuments, make more and more days a ‘day of remembrance’ for the Holocaust, and enforce Taboos on anyone who dares to ‘deny’ the Official Narrative of Shoah. And ANYTHING must be done to prevent another Holocaust. So, if 6 million Arabs must be killed to prevent Another Holocaust, it must be done. If 60 million Europeans must be killed to prevent Another Holocaust, it must be done. If 600 million gentiles must be sacrificed to prevent Another Holocaust, so it must be done. After all, if Jews are indeed so holy-shmoly, then a single Jewish life is infinitely more precious than any number of goy lives. Just ask the Palestinians how this logic works.

Every advantage has a disadvantage, and what had once been so advantageous to Protestantism is now a disadvantage in our post-religious world. Today, it’s fair to say that the majority of Protestants and Catholics don’t literally believe in the Bible. So, what is really left to keep the cult of faith going? At the very least, Catholicism still has its elaborate rites and rituals that provide form, guidance, structure, and spectacle. Even if one doesn’t believe in the actual creed, one can still be impressed by the grandeur and tradition. One may look upon such and feel it’s worthy of preservation because of its rich history and heritage. So, one doesn’t really have to believe-believe to find reasons to remain within the Catholic(or Orthodox) faith. There is the Tradition Thing, so rich in art, culture, and rituals.

In contrast, Protestantism staked everything on the purity of faith. So, as long as Protestants truly believed in God and the holy spirit, they had the advantage of higher conscience, devotion, and commitment. They were nearer to God as they were less reliant on the clergy as bureaucratic medium between man and God. But, what happens when the well of faith goes dry? What happens when most Protestants don’t really believe in the existence of God or aren’t really sure? Without that element of faith, Protestantism seems empty and barren. This was powerfully depicted in Ingmar Bergman’s WINTER LIGHT(aka THE COMMUNICANTS, ironically suggesting lack of communication between man and God). To a true man of faith, spirit alone may be enough or, better yet, a more effective path to God’s grace because he is unencumbered by the Magical-Materiality of Catholicism that ‘overly’ stresses the need to ‘toy’ with sacred items that a Protestant might look upon as akin to magic wands and rabbit’s foot collected by kids. But once the faith dries up, what does a Protestant have? When he believed, he could hear within the Silence the deep murmurings of God. But without faith, Silence just becomes silence, a nothingness. One can be a Catholic or Orthodox of Tradition even without literal faith in God, but it’s hard to be a Protestant of Tradition because the main stress has always been on purity of faith than on upkeep of heritage, rituals, and ceremonies(that had been kept to a minimum).

Now, an honest Protestant will just leave the faith and declare himself secular. But what about those who insist on remaining in the Church. Then, there are only two ways. One is the willfully dumb Evangelical way of saying NO to science and pretending that, yes, Noah had co-existed with dinosaurs and the world is only 6,000 to 10,000 yrs old. But to reject obvious scientific facts and cling to such willful ignorance leads to infantilization of the mind, and this is surely true of most Evangelicals, which is why they are such easy suckers manipulated by cunning Zionists.
The OTHER way is for Protestants to seek out new pseudo-sacred causes as substitute for faith in God whom they no longer truly believe. So, what remains of Mainline Protestant churches is mostly mindless commitment to fads and fashions like the neo-religion of Homomania or Queertianity(or SJC, Satanic Jewish christianity).