Why We Cannot Expect Jews to Tell Us the TRUTH — Jews Talk to Us like Adults Talk to Children — We Need to Grow Up and Stop Acting like Children before Jews-as-Adults

When adults and children talk, do we expect adults to always speak the truth? No. Even as adults press upon children to speak truthfully to adults, they don’t feel obligated to always speak truthfully with children. Of course, decent adults try to be as truthful as possible, but they believe, with good reason, that children are intellectually and emotionally unprepared to deal with certain truths. The mind of a child that can believe in Santa Claus can be led to believe in just about anything. While lying-to-children as a policy isn't good, expecting children to handle the truth like adults would be foolish. And so, there are certain truths that we don’t share with children. And if children ask inconvenient questions, we resort to half-truths or explanations(or even concoct lies) that we feel to be appropriate given the circumstances. Only gradually do children mature into adults in their emotions and sophistication, and it takes time for children to grow into young adults who can handle more truth. It’s been that way forever among humans all around the world.

But the adult-children dynamics often exist even among adults or between groups of adults. Some groups feel more intelligent, more knowing, and more deserving of power/influence. They believe they know and understand more. Therefore, while they themselves can ‘handle the truth’, they believe other groups cannot. Such group dynamics can be along educational, class, racial, religious, or ethnic lines. Obviously, those who attended and/or work for elite institutions feel they are smarter, more capable, and more deserving to know More Truth. In contrast, the less intelligent, less informed, and less sophisticated are deemed undeserving of the raw and unfiltered truth. They must be fed the official news processed by the so-called ‘mainstream media’ which is an industrial complex of the Deep State and oligarchic corporations. So much of state documents are redacted and kept secret. And Big Media are as much about hiding, twisting, or spinning the news as ferreting them out. New York Times and such publications may sometimes go the extra mile to expose secrets that the government wants suppressed, but more often than not, they work with the Power to decide what the people should or shouldn’t be told. Furthermore, even when the Big Media expose inconvenient secrets, they do so less for the public good or for truth-for-truth’s-sake than as a power game. When MSM broke the Watergate scandal, it was working with elements of the Deep State to oust Richard Nixon. And when the MSM pushed the Russia-Russia-Russia Hysteria, or Russysteria, to unseat Donald Trump, it was in collusion with the globalist Deep State that deems nationalism too petty for an empire like the US. So, the so-called Fourth Estate is less in service to the people than to the elites. Even when MSM spills the truth for the people to see and hear, it is less to inform the people and raise their political consciousness than to manipulate mass opinions so that one elite faction can undermine another elite faction. It's about using mass opinion to boost one elite faction against others.

People in the MSM believe they must be the gatekeepers of truth, facts, and opinions. They believe there are too many lies, falsehoods, fabrications, and ‘conspiracy theories’ in the alternative newsphere and online opinion world. And they are right about all the cranks, charlatans, looneys, and nutjobs on the internet spreading half-truths, false rumors, and fake news. And yet, it’s downright hilarious for MSM to sit atop the high horse when it’s been guilty of the same thing on a much bigger and more consequential scale. While liberal democracies offer more venues and outlets for news than totalitarian systems do, they are essentially ruled by oligarchies that are more concerned with power, prestige, and privilege than with truth, honesty, and integrity.
Elites have always regarded themselves as better and more deserving than the masses. They’ve seen themselves as the ‘adults in the room’ and sneered at the masses as ones who ‘cannot handle the truth’. Still, even such snobbery could be fused with genuine idealism, i.e. elites must strive to know more, understand more, and responsibly craft news & opinions for the good of the people. They may be vain and conceited but also sincere in their goodwill toward the people. Such is usually the case when the adult-children dichotomy among adults is only along class-lines. The higher classes with better education feel they should know more and have more power to do what is good for the lower classes, the hoi polloi. Such class dynamics plays out in the US, Russia, China, Iran, France, and etc. The US elites in NY, DC, and LA think they should tell us what to think and how to feel. The CCP believe it knows what is good for the Chinese people. The Russian government controls the news and narrative for the national interest. The leaders of Iran and France think they know best and suppress certain truths while highlighting or even exaggerating others.

But when class snobbery combines with racial supremacism, the adult-children dichotomy among adults becomes more problematic. Consider the Deep South where white elites considered blacks to be not only economic and cultural but racial inferiors. They believed the problem wasn’t merely that blacks had less education(if any) and knowledge but that blacks were innately less capable of thinking like adults. Blacks were regarded as childlike and naturally animal-primal in their emotions and thought-processes. As such, blacks could be told some truth but not all the truth. Blacks would not be able to process them, handle them. Besides, as blacks were bigger, stronger, and more aggressive, giving them the same rights and freedoms of white folks could be very dangerous. As history showed, a lot of white fears and anxieties about free blacks with equal rights proved to be valid. Biologically, it’s true that blacks are less inhibited, less rational, more impulsive, and wilder. As such, blacks aren’t capable of handling the truth in the same way as whites. (That said, the main problem was that white elites were not honest among themselves about the threat posed by blacks. Abraham Lincoln was candid about the black problem in private and hoped for a permanent separation of the races by means of repatriation or creation of a black republic. If white elites had spoken the truth about blacks to each other loud-and-clear and spread the same message to the white masses, the race problem could have been brought to an end. Imagine if white elites had spread the following message far-and-wide-and-loud-and-clear: "Blacks evolved to be more muscular, more aggressive, bigger-donged, and more psychopathic. Without separation, some may call for racial integration one of these days, and then blacks will destroy white manhood and conquer white women, and that will turn white guys into a bunch of 'faggot-maggots' and that will be the end of the white race. Also, as an idol is worth a million individuals in prestige & fame and as idols in America will be determined by athletic feats and musical prowess, blacks will likely take over as idols, and white boys and girls will effectively grow up worshiping Negroes as demigods." If white elites had spoken such truths, most whites would surely have agreed for radical measures to bring about racial separation when the US was still a virile and healthy race-ist nation.) Now, if blacks were smaller and weaker — like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis — , one might speak the whole truth to them and let it sink in. But as blacks are tougher, louder, and stronger, white folks are now scared half to death to say anything that might trigger blacks into flipping out. Still, even if white folks had good reasons to maintain an adult-children dynamics between themselves and blacks, many of their lies were self-serving. Worse, it’s often the case that those who lie to control others often come to half-believe in those lies for emotional comfort. The 'white lie' can become the official myth.

In the current US, Jews and Goyim are like whites and blacks in the Deep South prior to the Civil Rights Movement. Just like white elites in the South felt they deserved to rule because they were better educated, more cultivated, and more civilized, many Jews feel they should rule because they are more intelligent, more engaged, more informed, and wiser. So, Southern white elites were like the adults, and blacks(and ‘white trash’) were like the children(or chillun). Southern white elites were privy to certain truths whereas the blacks(and ‘white trash’) were fed simple narratives and fairytale-like myths... though in their vanity and self-aggrandizement, many Southern elites came to believe in the myth that the peddled to the masses — besides, most of the elites are too busy making money and leave it up to OTHERS to define the truth; as the cultural elites mostly write books for the public and as the children of the elites also read these books, they too come under the same kind of manipulation, the kind that prints legend as fact.
The childlike masses weren’t deemed as deserving of knowledge and privilege rightfully reserved for ‘adults in the room’ who know what is in the best interest for all of society. It’s like what parents say to each other, they keep from the children. It’s like the Movie Rating that forbids kids from watching R-rated movies without an adult guardian. It’s like special archives that are accessible only for those with credentials. The rest of us must rely on MSM and public libraries. Even the internet doesn’t allow access to state secrets and the like. Furthermore, monopolies like Google manipulate algorithms to favor Jewish-controlled 'mainstream news' over alternative sources that dare speak truth to power. Jews are like the Southern white elites in feeling that they know best and deserve special access to knowledge denied to most people. The rest of us, being childlike and insufficient in knowledge, should be controlled. We need to be told what to believe and how to feel. After all, Jews are the ‘adults in the room’ while we are ‘children in the romper room’. Jews feel that unless we are kept in the romper room with toys, we might go romper stomper.

But then, there is a Catch-22 kind of logic to Jewish Power over us. Jews say, because we don’t know enough, we must be kept from knowing too much. But if we don’t know enough, shouldn’t we be encouraged to know more so that we will be deserving to know the full truth one day? If a child must be kept from the truth because his mind isn’t ready for it yet, then shouldn’t he be intellectually and emotionally prepared so that he will be ready one day? Then, the same logic would apply to adult goyim. If too many adult goyim are currently too ill-informed and childlike to handle truth and nothing but the truth, then shouldn’t they be prepared and informed so that they will be more knowledgeable and understanding to handle the truth? And yet, the Jewish Paradox sets in that denies such possibility for growth among goyim. Jews say, because we don’t know enough, we must not be allowed to know more that may prepare us to know the full truth. Instead of urging us to know more to ultimately gain the truth, Jews say that because we don’t know enough, we should know even less. Indeed, our knowledge should be limited to what the Jewish-controlled MSM, entertainment, academia, and Deep State deem as 'acceptable'. For Jews, it's not a matter of truth vs falsehood but 'acceptable' vs 'unacceptable', with their ilk deciding what is acceptable or not. In a way, the way Jews see goyim is worse than how adults see children. At the very least, adults expect children to eventually grow up and handle the truth. In contrast, Jews want us to remain stupid children forever, all the better to control us emotionally and ideologically. Jews do not want us to think independently or attain autonomy of mind. Jews don’t want us to find and explore our own truth. They are to decide what is ‘extreme’ or ‘hateful’.

Now, if Jews were at least sincere in their commitment to justice and truth, their concerns would be more understandable. If Jews were truly moral and decent, I can understand why they would be concerned about young, impressionable, gullible, and immature people falling under the sway of stupid Neo-Nazi or white-supremacist nonsense that one does indeed encounter on the internet. While I’m for freedom of speech and free exchange of ideas, many young people have fallen under bad influence as the result of propaganda from both left and right. Whether one turns into a skinhead or an antifa goon, obviously such a person isn’t thinking. He is intellectually decrepit and emotionally crippled. But, in fact, even as Jews feign concern for justice and truth, they themselves are arch-tribal-supremacists and full of hateful extremism. Also, they not only oppose white supremacism or goy extremism but seek to suppress any healthy sign of white/goy consciousness lest it seek independence and liberation from Jewish Supremacism.
In this, Jews are like the white elites of the Old South. Even as the white elites made noise about how they needed to control the power, truth, and narrative to maintain a just and stable order over black savages and ‘white trash’, they were trying to keep it all for themselves. They wanted permanent privilege on both racial and class grounds. They not only felt that blacks and ‘white trash’ weren’t, as yet, ready for full power and truth but sought to maintain the existing power structure as long as possible. The lower elements deserved to know less because they knew less. Hardly an effort was made to urge the lower elements to know more so that they could know even more and eventually rise up the ladder. And yet, the white elites weren’t merely cunning and deceptive. Many of them came to believe in their own myths because it made them feel better. People justify power with myth, and then, if they aren’t careful, come to believe in the myth. It’s like getting high on one’s own supply.
Especially pertaining to blacks, the white elites in the South felt that the differences weren’t merely a matter of education and cultivation but race and blood. Even though some of them did mouth platitudes about blacks gradually rising up to higher civilizational standards, they mostly wished that blacks would always remain ‘children’ vis-a-vis the white ‘adults’ who knew what was in the best interest of the Negroes. Now, history has proven that blacks do indeed do better in societies ruled by whites who are more intelligent and even-tempered; black-run societies have gone to pots. And yet, such social dynamics, even if based on some degree of truth, was bound to be untenable in the long run because it demeaned black pride and contradicted American principles. While it seems factual that childlike blacks do fare better under whites in the role of ‘adults’, what people would want to believe that they are best off serving as obedient ‘children’ under the guidance of another race? This was especially tough for blacks to swallow since they are a very physical people who judge worth mainly in terms of who-can-whup-whose-ass? Because blacks ‘think’ so viscerally, they have a hard time accepting the fact that ‘faggoty-ass white boys’ are better than them in anything. Now, if white race were tougher, bigger, and stronger than blacks, then blacks would have less problem accepting the white race as the master race because black psycho-hierarchy gauges worth in terms of ass-whupping prowess. Indeed, the main sense of racial injustice among blacks isn’t so much that they were enslaved by whites. It’s that they were enslaved by a weaker and wussier race. As such, blacks feel that THEY should have been the master race over the whites: THEY should have been kicking white boys’ ass and humping white women. (In contrast, the short brown people of Latin America have been willing to regard the white Conquistador elites as the rightful rulers for being bigger and taller. The Aryan invaders of India also didn't have to worry about the physical threat because the Dravidians whom they conquered weren't bigger or stronger. Furthermore, the Aryans manipulated Hindu religion to 'sacralize' themselves as the more sacred class/race. By spiritualizing their power over the darker native folks, they made it a crime against the cosmos to challenge the existing social order. In a way, Jews see eye-to-eye with the Hindus because they are trying to create a caste system in the US with themselves as the Holiest Race based on the combination of Covenant myth and Shoah cult. Jews push a kind of 'Meritokarma' that would have us believe that Jews, with their superior intelligence and wisdom, deserve to be at the very top. And as many elite and wanna-be-elite Americans are obsessed about IQ and status — despite their bogus PC noises to the otherwise — , they do look upon Jews as the super-brahmin caste. Yet, not all Americans feel that way. White Nationalists, for instance, are more into aesthetics and beauty. While they believe Jews may be smarter, they believe whites are more attractive. And they believe that the white race has a right to preserve its beauty in white lands; as such, those most invested in the preservation of the white race and white beauty are most deserving to rule. This is why Jews see white beauty as something they must own, control, and commoditize. It must be turned from a racial preserve of the white race to a globalist product to be sold around the world by Jews.)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1FfpORiyo39H/

While Jews may be smarter than white goyim, the Jewish-white dynamics is very different from the white-black dynamics. While we can understand how the adult-children dynamics between whites and blacks was deeply offensive and hurtful to blacks(especially as it deemed whites to be racially more advanced than blacks), there is no denying that, without whites, blacks wouldn't have modern civilization, or much of civilization of any kind. Without whites, most blacks would be nothing but Jafro-Jivers chucking spears at hippos and running like mofos from lions or gorillas when not beating on bongo drums and shaking their booties. In contrast, despite higher Jewish intelligence and tremendous Jewish achievements, history has shown that whites can do just fine without Jews, indeed even better.
Paradoxically, higher Jewish achievements can be WORSE for white societies. Why? Because even though Jews use their high IQ for advancements in various fields, especially science, medicine, and technology, they use the profits not for the general good of the nation but to boost and reinforce Jewish Supremacism, and this entails the mental and emotional enslavement of the goy population. Jews will push any agenda or product, regardless of how harmful it may be to the general goy public, to strengthen themselves by weakening the Other. Take ACOWW or Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs for instance. Why are Jews using media, academia, entertainment, and advertising to push interracism, especially the kind where white wombs are to be colonized by black seed? It’s to demolish white male pride and white unity. Jews seek to turn the goyim into mulatto-mestizo who are so confused in identity that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish supremacist power. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that Jews will use their high IQ only for noble ends, such as finding cures for horrible diseases or exploring deeper philosophical truths. A lot of Jews are smart but shallow, and all they care about is money, money, money, and like gangsters and crooks, they will use ANY MEANS at their disposal to rake in more cash... like Jordan Belfort and his fellow Jewish pranksters who were the basis for the film THE WOLF OF WALL STREET. Of course, Hollywood being Jewish, Martin Scorsese took care to de-Jewify the story somewhat, but it’s pretty obvious what it’s all about.

In some ways, Jews are justified in feeling like ‘adults’ over white goy ‘children’. Even though the differences between Jews and white goyim aren’t as stark as the differences between the white race and the black race — Jews are Caucasian like the Arabs and, like the Europeans, a people with a deep history of civilization and achievements — , Jews(at least the Ashkenazi ones) are thought to be smarter than whites on average(and indeed even by one standard deviation). Also, Jewish personality is wilier and more cunning, crafty, clever, sneaky, and shifty. As such, Jews are more prone to be in the mind-game mode than whites are. Whites, especially those of Northern European stock, tend to be more obedient and simplistic in personality. In some ways, Jewish personality is to white personality what white personality is to East Asian personality. Jewish personality is more passive-aggressive, more multi-faceted. In a way, Jews had to develop such shifty Zeligish personality because they had to wear many masks. As a people who came to prominence with both prophecy and profiteering amongst various goy groups, Jews could never be just one thing. It’s like a salesman or a politician needs to have more of an adaptive personality than a farmer or truck driver. They must be chameleon-like; they must play different roles. Because Jews are more adept with a multi-faceted personality than white goyim are, they tend to look upon whites as overly earnest, trusting, or simple-minded. In other words, whites can be made simplemindedly antisemitic or simplemindedly philo-semitic. Whites can be made to go ‘full retard’ as either ‘nazis’ or ‘shabbos goyim’. Same is true of children. Children can be made to believe anything. They can be taught to be 100% Nazi or 100% Commie. Young ones can be made to believe in God or not believe in God. They can be made to believe in Santa or the Tooth Fairy. The Jewish Mind thinks strategically at all times and never lowers the guard. And it’s always looking for soft spots through which to thrust the blade. Jewish Mind is one with Jewish Pride, and this makes Jews defiant. So, it’s not easy for whites to convince or persuade Jews. Even when whites are correct and well-meaning in their interaction with Jews, the latter thinks, “What is the white goy REALLY after?” The Jew wonders, “Is the white goy trying to push his ‘truth’ onto me to control me?” And if the Jew realizes that the white goy is both correct in his truth and well-meaning in his sharing of the truth, he wonders, “Why is the white goy being SO DUMB and sharing this truth with me when I can remold and manipulate it against him?” The Jew is always asking questions, whereas the goy is not, at least not in relation to Jews.

In a way, the Jew-Goy dynamics is natural because it’s generally true that when a smart person is with a less-smart person, the former is more inquisitive whereas the latter is more trusting. The smarter person tries to figure out the ‘dummy’, whereas the less-smart person feels so flattered to be in the presence of the ‘genius’ that he gets all oh-goshy. Indeed, we see such uh-shucks-oh-goshiness among so many white goyim in the presence of Jews. Consider Charles Murray who wets his pants in the presence of Jewish Genius. Even Jared Taylor, though insulted, defamed, and excommunicated by Jews from social platforms and financial services, is always sucking up to Jews, deferring to them, and banning any criticism of Jewish Power & Israel on his site American Renaissance. The combination of higher IQ and wilier personality makes Jews feel more ‘adult’ in the presence of white goyim who seem less smart and less complex in emotional terms.
But of course, there is the added element of spiritual mythology and/or Holocaustianity. Among simpleminded Evangelicals, Jews are the original Chosen, the holy People of the Book. There was a time when Christianity said Jews killed Jesus and etc., but the New Narrative blamed it all on the Romans, and most Christian pastors are the biggest cucks of Jews in the world. For the secular goyim, there is the neo-spiritual faith in the Holy Holocaust that would have us believe no people suffered as much as the Jews and for NO GOOD REASON at all because, apparently according to the new historiography, Jews were pure-as-snow innocents all throughout history, and it was ALWAYS the goyim’s fault when Jews were met with explosions of violence. Jewish rationale is rather paradoxical. On the one hand, Jews denounce the superstitiousness of goyim who were prone to BLAME THE JEW. And yet, we are to believe that all those goyim in all those places all throughout history just lost their minds and went totally cuckoo in the presence of totally innocent Jews. So, who’s being superstitious? The real superstition is the Jewish Lie that Jews were always innocent and Goyim were always in the wrong. It’s statistically impossible that all throughout history, in all the outbreaks of violence between Jews and non-Jews, it was the Jews who were always innocent and it was the goyim who were always guilty. Unless Jews are a godlike people, there’s no way Jews were that good.

Unfortunately, Jews tend to fall into two categories. What both have in common is self-worship but in different ways. One group believes that Jews are indeed pure-as-snow and always right and so goody-good, and therefore, it really must have been the fault of goyim. These Jews believe that the Tribe is indeed holy because its members are indeed morally superior to the rest of humanity. Such Jews are Moral Supremacists. They do believe in morality but are blind to Jewish immorality toward goyim and only see the ‘evil’ of hostile goy reactions to Jewish bad behavior. Even though they call for Jewish unity in pride and prestige — all Jews deserve to share in the achievements of great and good Jews — , they are the first ones to say that the behavior of bad Jews do not reflect on the Jewish community as a whole. So, when Jews act good, all Jews deserve to share in the pride of goodness. But when Jews act bad, it is ‘evil’ and ‘antisemitic’ to notice certain patterns that pertain to the Jewish community in general. Still, the moral supremacist Jews do believe in some kind of code of ethics. In contrast, the other kind of Jews, the Nihilist Supremacists, believe Jews are superior just because. In other words, Jews are better, superior, and more deserving simply because they are Jews, the ultimate Tribesmen. Jews are right even when they do wrong because... they are Jews. So, it doesn’t matter if Jews do good or Jews do bad. As Jews, they can do as they please to lord over goyim and exploit them. They have the mentality not unlike that of the hoodlums in GOODFELLAS. They regard themselves as the Made Men, and the Covenant gives them license to act as the World Mafia.

While it’s inconceivable to imagine a social order in which all people are equally deserving of power and truth — even if such were offered to everyone, too many people will reject power and truth in favor of escapism and comforting myths — , we must nevertheless strive for a society where most people are adult-like and demand to know more and handle more responsibility. People must never be mindlessly trusting of the Power, and this goes for US, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and etc. There are no philosopher kings or wise-men among the ruling elites. Power has its own logic: Self-perpetuation by any means. Societies cannot do without concentrations of power, wealth, and influence, but the people must still insist on knowing more and ask tough questions. They must support a system of education, cultivation, and communication where people are encouraged to be more mature, rational, factual, and inquisitive. They need to be on the side of critical thinking, the will and courage to speak truth to power, or at least ask truth of power.
Jews know this is a threat to them. Why would they want people to think critically when, in the Current System, they are positioned as the ‘adults in the room’ while the goyim are relegated to ‘kindergarten’ status? Why would they want us to feel, think, and speak as adults when they prefer us to remain like children or cattle? This is why Jews push PC on schools at an early age. By pushing ‘anti-racism’, Jews seek to suppress white racial consciousness and identity. By pushing hysteria about ‘antisemitism’, Jews seek to suppress the truth that the main supremacist ideology of the West is Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, Wars for Israel, and nihilistic Jewish gangsterism throughout government & the economy. Jews are so clever. They pretend to be ‘anti-racist’ by denouncing ‘racism’ but then shield Jewish ‘racism’ or racial supremacism by invoking ‘antisemitism’ to suppress criticism of Jewish monstrosity against Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims. And of course, Jews push globo-homo to kids as early as possible in schools. Jews would have us ‘children’ believe that Homo-Mania is all about Human Rights and Justice, but it’s really about inculcating children with mindless worship of Minority Supremacism. After all, kids aren’t merely taught that homos are born that way and do odd ‘sexual’ things. They are taught that homos and trannies are the holy ‘rainbow’ people who deserve extra love and adoration. By making goyim worship homos as eternal minorities, Jews are trying to condition all goy minds to favor the minority-elite over the majority-norm. Sadly, the fact that SO MANY goyim have fallen for this shtick and even take their kids to libraries for reading sessions from trannies goes to show there is some truth to the notion of Jews as ‘adults’ and goyim as ‘children’. Adults lead, children follow. Jews lead, goyim follow.

But this is a habit goyim must break free of. Goyim must not be like Charlie Kirk the worthless cuck for whom ‘conservatism’ happens to be whatever Jews say it is. Kirk is more dog than human. He barks and rolls over accordingly. If Jews say NO WHITE IDENTITY, then Kirk says NO WHITE IDENTITY. If Jews say WHITES MUST SERVE JEWISH IDENTITY, then Kirks concurs and says WHITES MUST SERVE JEWISH IDENTITY. If Jews say ‘GAY MARRIAGE’ IS A CONSERVATIVE VALUE AND ‘LADY MAGA’ EPITOMIZES CONSERVATISM, then Charlie Cuck says the same. He really is a child. It could be he’s just an opportunist who says whatever to get a leg up in a Jewish-controlled system, but his childlike cuck-self really seems to believe in the ever-morphing ‘truth’ peddled by Jews who’ve taken control of Conservatism Inc. For such fools, truth is not a matter of what but of who. Truth is whatever said by Jews. So, if Jews say A is true, A is true. If Jews say B is true, then B is true. All that matters is WHO says it. If Jews say it, it must be true.
While not a genius, Kirk doesn’t seem like a retard either. So, why is he such a ‘child’, why is he such a dog? It’s because he has the emotions of an eight-year old who is so eager to please the ‘adults in the room’. Charlie Kirk the Cuck looks upon Jews as the holy ‘adult’ race and regards himself and fellow goyim as ‘children’ who must defer to the ‘grown-ups in the room and gain their approval’. It’s all so pathetic.

One of the most important projects among white goyim must be to create a culture of adulthood. There is a reason why adults are adults and children are children, but there is no good reason for a bunch of adults to remain childlike at the feet of other adults. It smacks of Oriental Despotism or Jerry-Springer-ism. Individualism used to be a means by which Western Man(and Woman) stood out and up from the herd and learned to think, feel, and act on his own. But over time, with the rise of Youth Culture and Pop Culture, individualism came to be degraded into mindless addiction to sensory overlord via electronica that promote impulsive behavior as being ‘liberated’. But liberated from what? Rational self-control, critical thought, skepticism, and restraint? It’s like a car being 'liberated' of its brakes. It will eventually go off the cliff. A truly free mind has control over both accelerator and brakes. Use of individualism to rise above the herd, gain self-autonomy, and question the Power is noble, but individualism to self-indulge in drugs, sex, and lunacy at the expense of responsibility is no freedom at all. It is enslavement of the mind to the senses, but such is the kind of individualism pushed by Jews who control most media, entertainment, casinos, and drug industries.
In the end, Americans mustn’t rely on Trumpism because its brand of populism ultimately infantilizes the populace with mindless slogans such as MAGA. That’s for the kids. The real adults should ask Trump, “If you’re so much about freedom and American nationalism, why do you keep sucking up to Jews who hate you and have done most to spread globalism all over the world?” Though Ann Coulter has a long way to go, she was adult enough to ask tough questions of Trumpism once Trump became president. He promised the Wall. So, where is it? And Michelle Malkin, though childish in many ways, took it upon herself to be more principled and truthful in challenging the bogus lies of Conservatism Inc with Charlie Kirks of the world as its fronts. Adults must ask tough questions, not just chant slogans like childish tards at Trump-Chump rallies. In the crazy present, while adults are urged to become more infantile and childlike, children like Greta Thunberg are elevated to guru status. Jews rule, and they want adults to be stupid 'children' and hand the mike to children who can be manipulated and mind-controlled. After all, what mind of her own does Thunberg really have? She believes whatever was told her by her parents who got all their worldview from the Jewish-run globalist media. In the Jew-controlled world, illegal is legal, and legal is illegal; sin is virtue, and virtue is sin; and adults are children, and children are adults. And even though Jews are the most powerful and most murderous force in the world, we are told we must look upon Jews as helpless victims in need of protection. But if you're a true adult, go ask the Palestinians about the true nature of Jewish Power. And if Jews treat Palestinians that way, why would they treat you any better?

In a way, goyim in elite circles and Deep State almost consider themselves as ersatz Jews. Though they consider themselves not as 'good, wise, and intelligent' as the super-Jews, the holy race of geniuses and Shoah tragedy, they nevertheless see themselves as good enough to have attended elite schools and reached upper ranks of power where they get to rub shoulders with the super-Jews. Deep State is utterly Philo-Semitic in this manner. Because they worship Jews and feel flattered to be working with and under Jews, there is a kind of super-adult-and-adult dynamics between Jews and elite goyim. Jews are super-adults and elite goyim are adults. And the rest of us are mere 'children' who must be managed by goy elite 'adults' who defer to Jewish 'super-adults'.
Because goy elites have access to the inner circles of power, they know the truth of Jewish Power and Perfidy. And yet, as they were instilled with Jew-Worship from cradle, they can't think rationally about the Jews(and blacks and homos, two other groups Jews have 'christened' or 'anti-christened' as especially holy). Also, those who are most eager to reach the top are less interested in truth, honesty, courage, and integrity than status, privilege, and power. Social climbers are really vain narcissists and nihilists at heart. They may flatter themselves that they want power and/or wealth for the higher/larger good, but it's mostly a self-justifying myth. Also, just like adults are often as foolish as children and believe in stupid things, there is no guarantee that the 'adults in the room', the so-called well-educated elites will favor truth, reason, and integrity over lies, cults, and mendacity. Most members of the elites won't dare say something true or do something courageous IF it means loss of status and reputation among peers, most of whom are vain social-climbers and status-preeners. This has always been the case with all peoples in all places at all times. So, even though it is generally true that the better-educated are more deserving to rule than the less-educated are, it's not a case of the good-and-wise ruling over the bad-and-dumb. Rather, it's fools with more education ruling over fools with less education. And for that reason, the elite justification for the suppression of truth is more often self-serving than for the common good.

Kevin Michael Grace vs Rodney Martin on Trump's Killing of Soleimani on THE LUKE FORD SHOW — Who Is Right?

The video above begins with Kevin Michael Grace's defense of Donald Trump's assassination of Soleimani and Iraqi militiamen as justifiable retaliation against the attack on the US embassy(which, in turn, was a response to earlier US attack on pro-Iranian Iraqi forces). Rodney Martin joins the discussion at 34:00 to condemn Trump's actions as being on behalf of Israel-Firsters, especially when, as Tucker Carlson has pointed out, so little has been done about Mexican Drug cartels and broken borders. (Of course, Carlson is too afraid to Name the Jew.)

Kevin Michael Grace as co-host on the Luke Ford Show is a man of journalistic experience and exhibits many positive attributes of the profession: Curiosity, erudition, and a critical mind. As a staunch conservative, a rare breed in journalism nowadays, he's been resistant to whims of fashion that have come to define Western culture and values. (But then, conservatism, like any -ism, comes with its own set of biases and blind-spots.) People like KMG are outliers not only because they're conservatives in an overwhelmingly Liberal profession but because they have 'liberal' tastes in arts and culture. Now, there is no reason for conservatives to be anti-art or anti-intellect, but in the modern era more liberals than conservatives have been invested in arts, culture, and ideas. One merely needs to survey the media, academia, and institutions. This imbalance has been more pronounced in America where conservatism has either a strong populist or Evangelical strain. As for conservatives committed to the arts, they've generally favored traditional arts, established reputations, or conventional genres. William F. Buckley Jr.'s idea of music was limited to classical. In contrast, KMGs' cultural sensibility and tastes are closer to those of Liberals though his analyses and judgments have a right-wing, Christian, and/or pro-white angle. Unlike the more staid culture warriors of Conservatism, KMG really gets and appreciates modernism, the avant-garde, and pop culture. He even dabbled in punk culture albeit for right-wing reasons. But KMG's inquiring mind and openness go only so far. Sometimes, he falls back on stereotypes and shopworn cliches to spout off on something he knows little or nothing about, as when he caricatured 60s Drug Culture in the manner of silly educational films only good for laughs. Though not a druggy myself — I don't even wanna try pot — , I know enough about hallucinogens from books and friends/associates that they aren't about seeing Magic Dragons. Though KMG is correct about the negative effects of drug culture(that got even worse with cocaine in the 70s, crack in the 80s, and meth in the 90s), he mis-characterizes something he knows nothing about. From Aldous Huxley's DOORS OF PERCEPTION & HEAVEN AND HELL and Jay Stevens' fascinating STORMING HEAVEN, it's clear that psychedelics weren't just escapism into a neural video-game with pink magic bunnies. Besides, doesn't Catholicism believe in miracles, a notion that has been exploited by charlatans to milk tears and dollars from suckers? KMG has interesting things to say when he opens his mind to any subject. Thus, even conservatives have something to gain from the liberal spirit; liberalism becomes a problem when it turns into dogma, as with Political Correctness, whereupon it becomes liberal-in-name-only and stuck within a iron-cast-of-mind. (Likewise, the radical leftist spirit has value insofar as it is willing to question and challenge the existing power structure. It turns sour when the spirit turns into dogma, as with Marxism-Leninism and hardens the passion into a cold iron fist.) Granted, liberals would do better with some degree of conservative anchor or roots as freedom without attachment is like leaves blowing in the wind: Free but fated to brown and wither. At any rate, one of the less appealing aspects of conservatism is to fall back on familiar biases without questioning assumptions. Sticking to the tried-and-true is usually good rule-of-thumb, but it doesn't provide all the answers. That the 60s drug culture went very wrong should be obvious to all, but to characterize psychedelia as KMG does surely misses something crucial. It's unlikely that so many people were drawn to such drugs just to lose one's sense of reality and to see objects turn into monsters. KMG's simpleminded take on Counterculture can be heard 46:00 in the video below.


Rodney Martin is an off/on guest on the Luke Ford Show, and I know little about him except that he's an American patriot, an upstanding member of Middle America. Though a regular American, he speaks more sense that most of the commentariat in Mainstream Media(that are as 'mainstream' as so-called Mainline churches are 'mainline'), and it's heartening that someone who isn't a professional in academia and government is as knowledgeable about world affairs and strives for moral consistency on US foreign policy. In the Grace-Martin discussion, Martin comes off much better because of this very consistency. To better understand the issue, consider the Politics of War in American History. The Liberal-Left opposition to Lyndon B. Johnson and the Vietnam War notwithstanding, most of the political discourse on War has been a matter of, "It's bad if your guy does it, it's good if our guy does it." We saw this with Liberals, leftists, and Progs from Bush II to Obama. While many on the Left opposed and condemned Bush II's invasion of Iraq(not least out of fear that it might turn out well), most were either silent or supportive of Obama's even worse destruction of the Middle East(Syria), North Africa(Libya), and Ukraine, not to mention the 'new cold war' with Russia. In contrast, the 'conservatives', who couldn't get enough of warmongering during Bush II's presidency, were either tepid in their support of Obama's war or even mildly voiced opposition. One of the remarkable things about Trump's 2016 campaign was his pledge to bring the troops home and make peace with Russia. He also denounced the invasion of Iraq as a total disaster. He also reiterated the obvious that the destruction of Libya and Syria only emboldened the terrorists. He did spew bile against Iran, but it was understood he had to throw some red meat to the Zionist oligarchs to get their money. At any rate, something remarkable happened as a result. The Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton became pigeonholed as the pro-war candidate, whereas Trump, for all his bluster and machismo, came across as an anti-war candidate. Thus, his supporters also became anti-war, and this angered the Neocon Jews who see the US as one giant aircraft carrier for Zion.

One of the developments since the end of the Vietnam War was the tendency to root for(or at least not oppose) war IF the commander-in-chief happens to be your guy. To the credit of the American Left, it opposed the Vietnam War when LBJ, a Democrat, was president, and then it opposed the war under Richard Nixon. There was a certain consistency in their position. But a narrative developed since then that the Progressive opposition to a Democratic administration led to the rise of Richard Nixon and Silent Majority. Therefore, the new strategy was one of vociferously opposing wars by Republican presidents while supporting or at least not-opposing wars by Democratic presidents. GOP, in turn, was likely to be far more supportive of GOP-led wars than Democratic-Party-led wars, but overall, its 'support the troops' mentality meant that its anti-war stance was weak at best. And so, Bill Clinton got away with lobbing bombs and missiles all over the place. And there was virtually no opposition to Barack Obama's war on Libya, coup in Ukraine, and aid to terrorists(labeled 'moderate rebels') in Syria. But then, Trump Phenom happened in 2016, and incredibly enough, it seemed as though American Conservatives could be the new anti-war voices and on principled than mere opportunistic basis. This was most welcome since the kind of people who are most likely to get killed in war are conservative white men. Furthermore, the Invade-Invite Strategy undermines American nationalism. By invading and destroying other nations, US loses moral credentials on nationalism, i.e. why should Americans have right of nationalism when their government violates and tramples on the sovereignty of other nations? Furthermore, the US strategy has been to give its invasions a human face with the invite-policy. "We may destroy your nation, but we are so warm-hearted and welcome you displaced folks to our nation." This has been going on since the Vietnam War. Kill millions over there but put on a human face by taking in untold numbers of refugees. This policy is especially damaging to American Conservatism since most of these newcomers end up voting for Democrats. One reason is the Democrats are for more immigration, but the other reason is, despite the fact that Jewish Democrats are the biggest globo-imperialists on Earth, the Democratic Party pays lip-service to concerns of People-of-Color and has at least some factions that speak up for Palestinian rights and oppose war(though never effectively). Thus, Democrats can enjoy their wars and imperialism while feigning 'progressive' credentials of peace and tolerance. In contrast, the GOP comes across as entirely pro-imperialist and pro-war. This was precisely why Donald Trump was so threatening to both Democrats and Republicans in 2016 when he ran, more or less, as a Peace Candidate. Though he projected power & pride(unlike spineless George McGovern in 1972) and supported the US military, he said all the wars in Middle East and North Africa have been disastrous, leading to more terrorism, more instability, more dead soldiers, more dead civilians, and the demographic invasion of Europe via Libya. He took a hardline position on Iran(unfortunately) and promised to reverse Obama's semi-conciliatory policies, but overall, he totally went off the GOP reservation to the ire of Neocon Never-Trumpers. And the passionate support for Trump among many American Conservatives(who cheered in the South when he said Bush family is responsible for the disaster in Iraq) suggested a sea-change in popular opinion. Could it be that American Conservatives are becoming Anti-War in principle? Could it be that Peace, Conciliation, and Diplomacy will become conservative positions while deranged Democrats will clamor for more wars(and cold wars)? Will American Conservatives break with the contemptible tradition of "War's okay if my guy's president, war's not okay if your guy's president." And for awhile, it seemed that way. Whenever Trump said he's about to pull out troops from Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, many on the New Right cheered whereas Democrats, wenches like Rachel Maddow, and Never-Trump Neocons crowed. It seemed as though the Progs really were stuck on More Wars whereas the New Right was set on No More Wars.

But as Jews run the US, Trump has been unable to make peace with Russia. Not only did the Jew-run Media blast Trump for any sign of thawing with Russia but the hysteria of Russia Collusion Hoax made sane diplomacy with Russia impossible. After all, if half the nation is convinced that Trump is Putin's Puppet, Trump will be denounced as traitor for any overtures to Russia. And despite his many noises, Trump hasn't been able to pull out troops out of Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan because the military-industrial complex and Jewish faction in the GOP are too powerful. Still, the fact that Trump managed to avert a new major war was seen as something. But perhaps it's the 'beat the wife and kick the dog' syndrome, the one where the man who is berated by his boss at work goes home to mete out violence against weaker members. Trump, having had his manhood taken away by Jewish Zionists and Globalists, is now a castrated and cucked man. As Jews have subverted and destroyed much of his first term, the logical thing for him would be to denounce Jews and maybe bomb Israel for its endless aggression and provocations against Syria, making it more difficult for the US to bring about any closure in that part of the world. But as we know, US is idolatrous of three groups as holy-schmoly — Jews, Homos, and Negroes — , and that means the Holy Holocaust People cannot be opposed or even criticized no matter what they do. So, even though Jews have been breaking Trump's balls from day one, he has to suck their cock and bend over to take it up the ass. Having been thus emasculated, how does Trump go about demonstrating his manhood? He plays dog to the Jews and mauls Arabs/Muslims or barks at Russia(or China). But no matter how loud a dog barks and how hard it bites, its 'toughness' is in service to its master.

A typical cuck celebrates the Jew-run US's attack on Iran/Iraq. He implies that Obama was a weak appeaser while Trump is a resolute patriot. In truth, Obama destroyed Libya, wrecked Syria, and pulled a coup in Ukraine at the behest of his Jewish masters. Obama also started New Cold War with Russia. Also, the money sent to Iran was Iranian money that the US had stolen and kept as 'frozen assets'. But the Jew-run media and cuck-politicians & pundits created this false meme that Obama showered Iran with free cash. Jew-run USA is an empire of lies.

The way Trump is going, he might trigger the biggest war in the Middle East yet, something that Jews want. (Even the peace deal under Obama was really just a trick. Jews were playing good-cop/bad-cop with Iran, throwing it some meat in the hope of driving a wedge between Iran and Russia. Notice that there has hardly been much opposition from Jews and Democrats for Trump's reneging on the Iran Deal.) Trump's reckless actions go to show just how powerful the Jews are in the US. Jews attack and destroy you, and your response is to cuck to them harder. It's like a dog trying to show greater loyalty to the master that beats it up. It's like a slave yelling, "Massuh, massuh, please, massuh", as the master beats him. Jews have done most to derail and defame Trump, but the cuck-man is sucking up to Jews to the point where it might lead to another war. Provoked ceaselessly, Iran might have to respond one day, and that will serve as pretext for another general Middle East War. Trump acts tough, but he knows he's close to being check-mated by Jews, and so he cucks to one faction of Jews in the hope that they will provide him sufficient moral cover and money to survive another day. And the price demanded by this pro-Trump Jewish faction is "MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL, you mangy dog-cuck." And of course, Fox News and other GOP dogs are barking to the script, regurgitating all the talking points about how Soleimani is responsible for 600 dead Americans — I guess 600 is a neat number like 6 million — and how Iran is the main sponsor of terrorism around the world(while anti-war voices on the Right grow more silent by the day). Once again, ugly opportunism is rearing its head over principled opposition to imperialism and war. Tucker Carlson is one of the few anti-war voices left, but even he sticks with the script that Soleimani was a bad bad guy. (Yeah, he's so very very bad, unlike all those heroic US generals who invade and bomb nations thousands of miles away at the whims of Zion, the globo-homo Sodom and Gomorrah of the Middle East.) Again, we are lurching into "My guy's wars good, your guy's wars bad." How long before all those dummy populists will cheer for War with Iran because their guy Trump is commander-in-chief?

Given KMG's keen intelligence and broad knowledge, one would hope he'd know better, but the fact is sensibility and prejudice often trump logic, consistency, and principles. And it seems KMG is turning into a War-Cuck because the basis of his worldview is Western hegemonism, Crusadism, and power-worship-ism. KMG says he's a nationalist and opposed to imperialism, but that means he's for Zionism but not for Palestinian nation-hood. Nationalism only matters to his kind and peoples he likes and to NO ONE else. He opposes non-white invasion of the West, but he feels it's okay for the US to drop bombs and assassinate people in other nations as an occupying force. And even though Jewish Power has done most to castrate and destroy the white race since the end of WWII, he claims to be Philo-Semitic. In other words, nationalism for KMG is mere opportunism to protect and preserve the West and to honor Jews. It doesn't apply to Palestinians and Arabs/Muslims who apparently exist to be bombed and murdered by West's pro-Zionist war machine.
But then, why does KMG admire the Jews? Because Jews are smart, rich, and accomplished. Because Jews are a great powerful people, he dreams of an alliance with them against the non-white world. In a way, KMG's fatal attraction to Jews is akin to Adolf Hitler's mis-perception of Anglos. Hitler admired the Anglos so much that he hoped for alliance of UK and Germany against much of the world, esp. against Jews and Russia. It was a sentimentality on Hitler's part that proved fatal. As Anglos were allied with Jews against Germany, the natural thing would have been for Hitler to maintain his alliance with Stalin. But he attacked Russia instead. Hitler's Anglo-dreams proved to be utterly useless. Likewise, KMG's Philo-Semitic dreams are useless. While a handful of Jews might think well of KMG, most Jews regard him as no different from neo-Nazi ilk. After all, KMG has called out on Jewish bad behavior and interviewed Kevin MacDonald(who is allied with David Duke and Jared Taylor). To Jews, Kevin MacDonald is evil incarnate, and anyone who gives him a fair hearing must be a 'nazi sympathizer'. It doesn't matter that KMG, despite his criticism of Jews, is ultimately a cuckish Philo-Semite because the ONLY kind of Philo-Semite that is acceptable to Jews is one that never ever dares to utter a single syllable critical of Jews. KMG is a sentimentalist about Jews because he thinks his kind can form a sound, stable, and fair relationship with Jews: One where Jews criticize whites, whites criticize Jews, but where both sides respect one another and carry on more-or-less as equal partners. In fact, such isn't in the cards given Jewish personality, arrogance, and megalomania. Jews want whites to be their dog, horse, and cattle. Whites better obey and serve. KMG is willing to serve, but he wants to speak his mind about bad Jewish behavior wherever such exists, but Jews will not tolerate any such. Thus, KMG has been purged just like Kevin MacDonald and Jared Taylor, another sentimentalist about Jews, the very people most responsible for his deplatforming. KMG is right to denounce the seedier and crazier elements of 'white nationalism', but he's under the illusion that Jews regard him any differently because he denounces Richard Spencer and David Duke. No, in Jewish eyes, he's no different. As Jews got the power, it doesn't matter what KMG wishes or thinks. What matters is what Jews think, and Jewish Power says KMG is a white-nationalist-supremacist-neo-nazi-homophobic-catholic-bigot.

I can understand cultural and intellectual Philo-Semitism. Like them or not, Jews have been a great people who contributed notably to arts, culture, religion, science, ideas, and entertainment. So, naturally Jews are worthy of admiration and respect, especially among those goyim who are engaged in the life of the mind and creativity. The problem is POLITICAL Philo-Semitism, i.e. the notion that because Jews have been great in many cultural and scientific spheres, they are somehow above the law or more-equal-than-others. Such pseudo-moralism is a kind of nihilism, a perversion of meritocratism that says those with superior intelligence or achievement have the right to push others around. Consider the Germans and Japanese. Both are highly accomplished peoples with fascinating cultures. Germans made great contributions to music and science. Japanese absorbed influences from China, India, and the West and produced interesting variations. So, one can understand Germanophilia or Japanophilia. But that doesn't mean Japanese have the right to conquer and push around less accomplished peoples. It doesn't mean Germans should invade and push around, say, Bulgarians and Slovaks who are less accomplished intellectually and culturally. The problem with Kevin Michael Grace is that his Cultural Philo-Semitism has turn into Political Philo-Semitism. So, he supports Zionist Nakba of Palestinians and the Occupation. He apparently feels no sympathy for Arab victims of Jews because they're inferior culturally and intellectually. (Or perhaps, there is at work a kind of Spiritual Philo-Semitism, which is the flip side of Spiritual Antisemitism that has been identified with Christianity that long blamed Jews for the killing of Christ. If Christian Antisemitism especially blames the Jews, Christian Philo-Semitism especially blesses the Jews as the Chosen, not least to atone for the Holocaust carried out by 'Christian Europe', though Nazis were Neo-Pagans. By current standards, KMG would be a Christian Anti-Semite for his dogmatic conviction that there is no salvation for Jews in the hereafter without Conversion, but on a subconscious level, he seems to balance this 'moral deficit' via Christian Philo-Semitism that says, even if Jews-as-Jews cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven, they are deserving of the Holy Land and the support of the Christian community, despite the fact that Jewish-controlled foreign policy have caused grave harm to Christian Arab communities. Or, as a staunch Catholic who has never abandoned the Crusading mind-set, perhaps KMG feels that Europeanized Jews taking the Palestine from the Muslims is a kind of semi-victory for Christendom despite the fact that Jews have turned the Holy Land into Sodom-and-Gomorrah with massive globo-homo debauchery.) This is rather ironic since Jews see the white goy race as inferior in intellect, ability, and wisdom, therefore deserving to be used like horses, dogs, and cattle by Jewish masters. In other words, Jews look upon white people like KMG looks upon Arabs and Palestinians: An inferior people who deserve to be pushed around and made to obey. Kevin Michael Grace says he loves Jews and only dislikes those secular Jews who are paranoid about whites. But the fact is MOST Jews fall into the secular-and-hostile-to-white category. Most Jews voted for Hillary, and many Neocons became Never-Trumpers. And even those Jews who stick by Trump do so ONLY BECAUSE he cucks to Israel and worsened relations with Russia. Furthermore, if indeed KMG is a Philo-Semite, it is largely because of his admiration for SECULAR Jews who achieved most in the realm of arts, ideas, and science from the late 19th century. I doubt if KMG would be so awed with Jews if most of them were religious dogmatists with middling IQ who never contributed much to Modern Culture. Jewish pride and prestige since 'Emancipation' in the 19th century owe almost entirely to secular Jews, many of whom were radical and/or hostile toward whites and Christians. KMG dismisses as 'sentimental' the people in the West who sympathize with Palestinians, but it is he who is a sentimentalist about Jews. Most Jews are hostile to the white race and the West. They are pushing White Nakba and cheering for the Great Replacement. It's not Muslims or Palestinians who control the commanding heights of the West. It's the Jews. Also, KMG, like so many others like him, despair of some Jews being victimized by Diversity. But why should they care when Jews do NOT care about whites victimized by Diversity? If anything, Jews rejoice when whites are victimized by blacks, browns, and other members of Diversity. Just read the pages of the NY Times. Just watch all those TV shows that defame and vilify whites as the New Kulaks or KKKulaks. KMG is stuck in an unrequited love relationship with Jews who only piss all over guys like him. Same goes for Jared Taylor who was deplatformed by Jewish Power but still sucks up to Jews and cheers Zionism even though the grand Jewish Plan is to turn whites into New Palestinians. KMG may point out that Jews in UK and Canada now vote majority-conservative, but what does this mean? Jews have already turned 'conservatism' in Anglo-sphere nations into cuck-politics that cheers Diversity, waves the globo-homo flag, and worships Jews to high heaven. In other words, the kind of 'conservatism' that managed to win over the majority of Jews in Canada and UK is nationalist ONLY when it comes to Israeli interests and Jewish Pride. In other respects, it's hardly distinguishable from 'liberalism' that, in Canada and UK, may be a tad less enthusiastic about All-Things-Zionist. Besides, the reason why the so-called 'conservatives' are even more servile to Jews is because Jewish Elites are still on the 'liberal' side. As Jews are now revered as a holy people and as Jewish Elites got the real power & all the money — the real source of Jewish power isn't votes but money & media — and lean 'liberal', the 'conservatives' must make an extra effort to woo Jews to their side. We see the same thing in the US. Most of Jewish elite power is with 'liberalism' and the 'Democratic' Party, and that is precisely why 'conservatives' pander to Jews even harder. Why don't 'conservatives' just regard Jews as the enemy? Because Jews have been elevated to Holy Holocaust People, and it simply wouldn't do to alienate this god-men, even if they are busily attacking and defaming you and your kind.

So, does this mean that KMG should embrace Neo-Nazism and the crazier elements of Alt Right because Jews see him the same way? No, of course not. We should all keep our distance from lunatics(though, as the saying goes, even a broken clock is correct twice a day, and we should acknowledge that even someone as compromised as David Duke has made certain worthy contributions to the cause with courageous talk, as in this brilliant video). But we should also dispel the myth that Jewish Power will tolerate honest criticism and respect other groups on equal terms. Jews are in Judeo-Nazi mode and demand submission and obedience. We know this from how Jews work on Congressmen, virtually all of whom are made an offer they can't refuse: Sign a pledge to Israel or else. Jews are also the biggest hypocrites in the world. They berate whites for 'racism' and 'white supremacism' and say US/Canada belong to all the world and Diversity, but then they turn around and say ALL Americans & Canadians of all races and backgrounds must cheer for Jews(and Homos) uber alles. If indeed Jews are for racial equality and against ethno-centrism, why must all Americans favor Jews over Palestinians in the Israel-Palestinian Conflict?
And yet, KMG favors the Jews because, despite his knowledge and intelligence, he is at heart a Crusadist-imperialist, power-worshiper, and misguided in his racialism. After all, would KMG really care about Jews if they weren't so rich, so accomplished in arts & intellect? KMG's elitism favors the great peoples over un-great peoples even at the political level. Such attitude isn't much different from the Nazi notion that Germans deserve to invade and rule over the less accomplished Slavs. Jews > Palestinians, Germans > Slavs. Also, as European Jews are half-white, KMG favors them over them Ay-rabs and Muzzies. To many white pro-Zionists, Jews in Israel are 'our whites' and Palestinians are 'those niggers'. KMG even denigrates Palestinian resistance by associating the term 'intifadah' to what black thugs do in the US. Palestinians used intifadah to oppose ongoing Zionist invasion and occupation of West Bank and Gaza, but for KMG, such resistance is no different from black criminal elements wreaking havoc to rape, loot, and rob. Never mind that the Jews are robbing Palestinians of the remaining territories. KMG projects his own rather pathetic sentimentality about Jews onto those who defend Palestinian right of nation-hood. According to KMG, championing the most basic right of nationhood for Palestinians is 'sentimentalism' while sucking up to Jews who hate, defame, and smear people like him apparently constitutes moral rectitute.

Why one or the other? The current orthodoxy holds that one can be both a total tool of Jews and a New Hitler. Consider how Jews regard Donald Trump. They use all their power to ensure that Trump will be totally pro-Zionist in waging more wars for Israel and crushing the national aspirations of Palestinians. Jews make sure that Trump, as puppet of World Jewry, will worsen relations with Russia and increase tensions with Iran. But at the end of the day, despite all of Trump's cucking to Jews, he is still smeared by the Tribe as the New Hitler. Then, the same Jewish Logic applies to people like Kevin Michael Grace. In Jewish eyes, he is both a useful tool of Zionism and a 'white supremacist' far-rightist, even a 'Catholic-Nazi'. Indeed, anti-Trump Jews and 'pro-Trump' Jews play good-cop/bad-cop as they mindfuc* Trump. Anti-Trump Jews accuse him of being an evil 'white supremacist', and so, Trump needs moral protection from so-called 'pro-Trump' Jews, but this comes at a steep price: More New Cold War with Russia, more Wars for Israel, and shut down of BDS and the First Amendment. Jews cannot be appeased. KMG can cuck to Jews all he wants, but he will still be a 'nazi' or 'white supremacist' to them because he doesn't cuck 100%. That's the kind of people he is so Philo-Sentimental about.

There seems to linger a hope-against-hope among the likes of KMG and Jared Taylor(who are so besotted with Jewish power, achievements, and moral status stemming from the Shoah) that IF, maybe just maybe, whites demonstrate their fealty to Jews and Israel just one more time, the Jews will come over to the White Side. But in fact, just as Hitler's sentimentalism about Anglos was misguided, so was Stalin's misconception of Hitlerism. Just like, despite Hitler's overtures to the Anglos, the Anglosphere turned against the rise of German Imperialism, no amount of Stalin's 'trust' of Hitler was going to turn Nazi Germany into a true ally of the USSR. When the time was ripe, Hitler invaded Russia for keeps. Likewise, Jews are in supremacist mode and want to keep the white race as its dog, horse, and cattle. There cannot be mutual respect between Jews and whites. Jews think, "We win, you lose", or "We command, you serve." Jews know they got the meritocratic advantage while whites got the majority-advantage. Jews know that whites will stop serving Jews IF white elites decide to represent the white majority than cuck to the Jewish minority elite. Therefore, all vestiges of white consciousness, even "It's Okay to be White", must be banished from the public sphere. In the end, people like Jared Taylor and KMG are crit-cucks but cucks just the same. Crit-cucks are willing to notice and criticize Jewish Power but, when push comes to shove, they will side with Jews, serve Jews, and obey the Oi-Vey. They aren't like the cuck-cucks who constitute Congress & white elites who totally submit to Jewish Power like Oriental servants kowtowing before the Emperor of Wanton Mercilessness, but they will always reliably side with Jews against Palestinians and the 'muzzies' even when Jews are in the wrong.
Of course, Luke Ford himself is a crit-cuck, not least because he converted to Orthodox Judaism. Ford often speaks bluntly about Jewish Power and Jewish bad behavior, but as a Jewish Convert he is committed to Israel, Zionism, and Jewish Power. His loyalty to Jews contradicts his contention that all groups are tribal and ethno-centric. If so, why isn't Ford, a man of Anglo origin, not sticking with his own kind and fighting for Anglo-national identity? Why did he go over to the Jewish side? It's because there's something even more powerful than tribalism and nationalism. It's power-ism, the Will to Cower before the Will to Power, as when French women in droves ran into the arms of Nazi Occupiers. As Jews got the Will to Power and the Actual Power, so many white cucks(and cucks-of-color) act the bitch and bow down before Jewish Power, the new emperor of wanton mercilessness. Furthermore, obeying Jews or becoming a Jew(as Ford has chosen to do) comes not only with material benefits(or shield) but moral sanctimony as Holy Holocaust Worship has replaced Christianity, what with Anne Frank as the new madonna. Why did Ford convert to Orthodox Judaism than Reform Judaism? Partly because his conservative-leaning values are more likely to be found among Orthodox Jews. But in a way, it could be a way for Ford to compensate for his lack of Jewish roots by serving a hardcore strain of Judaism. After all, if you're born Jewish, you don't have to make an effort to be Jewish. Even if you never attend Temple or traveled to Israel, you can rest on the laurels of being Jewish by blood. But if you converted to Judaism, you must make a big show of being the Real Thing. Thus, becoming a hardcore Orthodox Jew gives Ford a chance to feel more Jewish than Jews-born-Jewish. Often, imitators without the title of originator make up for their deficit with zeal. Is it any surprise that Northern Europeans who came to Christianity later developed more puritanical strains of it?

Anyway, Rodney Martin comes across with more integrity in the discussion with KMG on the Luke Ford Show. Unlike KMG, he calls out on Trump's actions as a show of obsequiousness to Jewish supremacists, all the more pathetic since Jews are leading the charge against Trump. Also, Martin provides the context within which the attack took place. According to KMG, the US had to do SOMETHING in retaliation against the attack on the US embassy in Iraq. Now, if out of the blue Iranians/Iraqis decided to attack the US embassy for no good reason, then KMG would be correct. An attack on an embassy is a serious violation, and a superpower like the US must take action. However, we cannot ignore the context of why so many Iraqis/Iranians/Arabs/Muslims are irate with the US. The attack on the embassy didn't just happen out of the blue for no reason but because the US, as proxy-power of Zion, has been tearing the Middle East and North Africa apart. So, while purely on principles, KMG is right about violation of embassies, the fact is principles are dead in the Middle East and Jews & US killed them. Just consider. The US concocted lies to invade and occupy another nation, namely Iraq, under Bush II. Meanwhile, the nations most responsible for having created the Al-Qaeda — the US, Pakistan, and Saudis — averted responsibility. It was the Saudis and CIA that had armed the Jihadis in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Iraq had nothing to do with it, but Iraq got the blame. In the Clinton 90s, it was said 100,000s of Iraqi kids were killed as the result of sanctions. But the madness didn't end there. Under Obama, Libya was targeted and destroyed for trying to create a gold-based currency for Africa. KMG and others like him may accuse Obama of 'weakness' for not having defended the US embassy in Benghazi, but Obama was sure 'tough enough' to wreck an entire nation. Indeed, the attack on US embassy was the direct result of US arming and aiding the Jihadis in that nation. Obama and Jews even pulled off a coup in Ukraine by allying with Crypto-Nazi elements. And Obama and Hillary, as servants of Jews, began the process of arming Jihadis in Syria, tearing that nation apart, all the while tolerating Israel's constant attacks on that nation. Under Trump, the US lied about chemical attacks and lobbed missiles into Syria and continues to occupy oil fields.
Now, what is a greater violation of international law, norms, and decency? What the US, Israel, and Saudis have done or the hapless attack on US embassy in Iraq? Given the context, it seems what was done to the US embassy was NOTHING compared to crimes committed by Jews and the US. But even as KMG has opposed US interventionist policy in the Middle East, he has expressed little moral outrage. Rather, his real ire is about the attack on US embassy where NO ONE died. His Christian moralism is entirely racial(and misguided since the current US isn't even Christian but globo-homo as Queertianity is the new faith under Jewish hegemony). At Benghazi, only four Americans died, but that is a bigger outrage than all the Libyan cities and towns destroyed by Zio-NATO intervention. According to KMG's moral logic, the US invasions of other nations and violations of sovereignty are less outrageous than the attack on US embassies as imperial outposts.
Btw, if attacks on embassies always call for counter-strikes, would KMG have cheered China's retaliation by killing US generals following the US attack on the Chinese embassy in former Yugoslavia? US claimed it was an accident but really? Or, will KMG say the Chinese deserved it because they were doing fishy things in that part of the world? If Chinese deserved it for shady behavior via their embassy, couldn't the same be said for the US embassies in Libya(where US armed the very Jihadis who turned against them) and Iraq(where no one died by the way, in contrast to what happened to the Chinese embassy)? KMG invokes Jimmy-Carter-as-wimp as foil to Trump, but Carter had his hands tied because the Iranians were holding 55 American hostages. Also, the US was in an embarrassing situation because it had backed the much loathed Shah of Iran(hated by all sectors of Iranian society, from secular liberals to Islamists), a CIA-puppet. Also, as New Iran was both anti-American and anti-Soviet, the US risked pushing Iran into the arms of the USSR if the US waged war on Iran. This was still the era of Cold War and Post-Vietnam fatigue. An Iran allied with the Soviets would have undermined US ambitions in Afghanistan. Also, once Reagan came into office, he sealed the money-for-hostages deal with Iran. He didn't attack Iran either. And when Marines were attacked in Lebanon, Reagan's immediate reaction was to pull out all troops. Was he a wimp for opting out of more intervention in that part of the world? And speaking of craven cowardice, it was the US that did NOTHING when Israel pulled the Lavon affair, stole nuclear material from the US, and willfully attacked the USS Liberty to kill ALL servicemen. To this day, the US hasn't officially recognized what really happened on that day. This is the cuck-coward nation that the US has become under Jewish domination, but KMG laughably invokes Douglas MacArthur's quote about victory. It's the Jews who've occupied the West and are bringing it to ruin. It's the Jew-run West that's been wrecking the Muslim World and killing 100,000s of people. US under Obama and Trump have also aided Saudi Arabia's near-genocidal war in Yemen. And yet, KMG's idea of victory is cucking even harder to the Jews and attacking Iran, one of the few nations that resist the Jew-run US.
Given the context, the US has no right to speak of principles or rights. It violates all principles and all international norms to get what it wants, which is cucking to Jews. What is worse? An Iranian-backed attack on US embassy or the US plotting to bring down an entire government in Ukraine? Also, the very Jews who did regime-change in Ukraine plotted likewise in the US against Trump, pushing the crazy Russia Hoax lunacy and then finally having Trump impeached over the Ukraine comedy, but what does Trump do at the end of the day? He cucks to Israel and attacks Iran. This is 'victory'? If we lived in a world of peace and mutual respect and IF Bad Ole Iran attacked US embassies in other nations, I would agree that the US must act. But the US is now an evil globo-homo nation whose culture is rap, twerking, porn, and Jewish-made TV shows & movies that defame & dehumanize the white race as 'evil nazis who must be hunted down and killed'. But all said and done, KMG's sentimentality for Jewish Power and Awesomeness gets the better of him. He is critical but ultimately a cuck, or a crit-cuck. A crit-cuck may be preferable to a cuck-cuck like Ben Sasse, but it's still pathetic given what Jews have done to the US and KMG's beloved Canada, where the new 'conservatism' means More Diversity for whites and national-rights only for Jews and Israel.
If we go by the adage of bad nations deserving their comeuppance, then the US and Israel need to be bombed many times over. Most of their elites need to stand trial and be hanged. If Japan got what it deserved for its attack on Pearl Harbor, the US deserves far bigger punishment for its lies and invasions. But of course, the US can do as it likes because it's the sole superpower. It's not about principles but the privilege of power. While it's true that power matters and we can't expect all nations, big and small, to get the same treatment — stronger powers will always have more leeway — , there needs to be limits to the power of any nation, but the Jew-run US is now committed to doing ANYTHING to get what it wants. So, if Jew-run US is about Zionism Uber Alles, the hell with Palestinians in West Bank, the hell with Syrians who suffered so much, the hell with Iranians, the hell with Russians, and the hell with white Americans and Canadians who are fated to be replaced by Diversity at the order of Jews. And if Jews feel like cooking up total nonsense like Russia Collusion Hoax and dividing the nation politically and derailing peace with Russia, so be it. Israel, that has 300 nukes made from stolen US material, gets showered with billions while Iran that has allowed international inspections must be sanctioned to death. KMG ignores this larger context and huffs-and-puffs about the attack on the US embassy. Imagine if a black guy taunts, spits on, beats up, and cripples a white guy, but the biggest moral outrage is that the white guy, in retaliation, called the black guy a 'nigger'. That's about the level of KMG's moral integrity when it comes to the Middle East. What is a greater violation of international norms? The Jew-run West and Trump cooking up lies about Assad's chemical attacks and shooting missiles into that country or some ragtag Iraqis attacking the US embassy because the US occupation/imperialism never ends and acts more arrogant by the day?

But what kind of VICTORY? Given that the West is under Jewish Supremacist Control and that this power is pushing for White Nakba & Great Replacement, shouldn't white people be working toward national liberation via total victory over Jewish Power? As different as whites in the West and Iranians are, they have one thing in common: Both are victims of Race War carried out by Jews. Sorosian Jews are hellbent on turning all white nations into Diversity Hellholes and having white wombs be colonized by black seed. Iran, for all its faults, is defying Jewish supremacist power, whereas whites are cucking to the very power that is doing them the most harm. Whites are cheering on the very people who've devised the grand plan of great replacement. It's the Jews in media, academia, and Hollywood who've spread the most anti-white TV shows and movies. KMG complains about how Chinese and Muslim pressures have affected Hollywood products, but the MAIN censorship in US Entertainment is Judeo-centric, i.e. virtually no critical discussion of Jewish bad behavior, e.g. THE VICE blames oil companies for the Iraq War while being mum on the role of Neocon Jews. If anything, white people should take a page from the Chinese & Muslims and collectively threaten Hollywood with racial boycott unless Jews stop with the anti-white vitriol. So, if KMG is for victory, he should be calling for Total Victory over Jews. But his idea of victory is Trump being led on a leash by Zionists to attack Iran, one of the few nations that have managed to stand up to Zion and survive. Back in MacArthur's day, the US was ruled by Anglo-Americans. American Victory back then was victory for White America. In our day, the US is ruled by Jewish globalist whose ideology is essentially Soros-ism. Victory is impossible for whites as long as they are under the tyranny of Jews. No matter how many bombs Trump drops on Iraqis and Iranians to make himself look tough, the only victory will go to Jews who love to make goyim fight goyim. But KMG is too sentimental about Jews to see the big picture.

Another sicko calls for genocide against the Iranians, but this is A-Okay with Twitter that is supervised by Jewish supremacist ADL and SPLC.

Rodney Martin is the true patriot because he understands the context of what is happening. US is under Jewish Supremacist Occupation, and Trump is now little more than a globo-homo ambassador of Zionist hegemonism. He made noises about pulling out of Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, but it was all empty talk. And though having averted a major war in the region, he is now threatening Iraq with sanctions IF it expels US troops and threatening to blow up 52 targets in Iran, even historical and cultural sites, in the service of Zion. The US and Canada are now nations where historical monuments are being torn down, where churches are vandalized & desecrated by globo-homo symbols, where tattoos & piercings are commonplace, where young white girls are conditioned for jungle fever & young white males are trained to be cucks, where 100,000s of 'white trash' have been killed by Jewish-peddled opioids, and where every white town is targeted for Great Replacement — and Jews have a key hand in all these trends — , but Trump as 'tough guy' is threatening to bomb historical sites in Iran, a nation that dares to defy Zionists and Israel. And KMG, though willing to criticize Jews, ultimately cucks to them by declaring himself a Philo-Semite with the delusion that 'secular' anti-white Jews are negligible when, in fact, they constitute the great majority of Jews, especially among Jewish elites who hold all the cards. And KMG isn't the only one to cuck thus. All these white guys who haven't the balls to to resist and oppose Jewish power flex their muscles by beating up on 'muzzies'. It's the White goy Will to Cower before the Jewish Will to Power. Jewish Power is turning people like KMG into the New Palestinians, but their idea of 'victory' is bombing and killing Muslims for the merriment of Zion. At this point, any rhetoric about sanctity of embassies ring hollow because the US violates ENTIRE NATIONS with invasion and destruction. But according to KMG's logic, invading and destroying another nation is a lesser deal than attacking an embassy. KMG claims to be a nationalist opposed to imperialist, but when push comes to shove, he is a Crusadist who cheers on MacArthurite Imperialism and sucks up to the biggest power, which now belongs to Jews. In this, there is precious little difference from KMG and lunatics like Frank Burton. In a way, Luke Ford and KMG, as crit-cucks, illustrate why Anglos lost to Jews. For all their criticism of Jewish Power, they remain Philo-Semitic toward the very people who've done the most harm to the white race since the end of WWII. Ford converted to Judaism, and KMG declares himself a Philo-Semite, as if that will temper the hatred and contempt that most Jews feel for him.
The mindset of KMG offers a glimpse into the fatal sentimentality with which so many whites in the West behold Jewish Power and Prestige. For all his critical acumen and commitment to Catholicism, it's as if KMG's life is incomplete without demonstrating that he too is very much with the Tribe despite its War on Whiteness. You see, the Problem Jews are those secular ones and just never mind that MOST Jews voted for Obama and Hillary and rub their hands with glee over the Sorosian prospect of the West becoming Diversity Central. Jews push invade-invite policy with the Muslim World because the Invite gives a human face to the Invade, i.e. "We may invade Muslim nations but look how we are welcoming and embracing them as 'refugees'." Jews spread anti-Muslim tropes among white Christ-cucks to make them fight Wars for Israel in the Middle East but then spread anti-white and anti-Christian tropes among Muslim immigrants to make them side with Jews against whites. And yet, KMG's gripe about Muslims is that might attack Jews. He cares about Muslims hurting Jews even though Jews don't care about Muslims(or any non-whites) attacking and killing whites. In the end, Crit-Cucks are as useless as Cuck-Cucks.

Frank Burton suggests that those who oppose war and resist the Zionist control over the US are looking to Iran as some savior nation. This is utter bull. Anti-War Right's position is that the US and the West are no longer in any position to be lecturing to the world about freedom and justice. US is a nation where people are fined and jailed for refusing to bake 'gay wedding' cakes. It is a nation where Jews, Homos, and Cuck cultural-vandals can desecrate Christian Churches with globo-homo victory banners, but a man is sentenced to 14 yrs in jail for burning such a vile symbol. It is a nation where white cuck dads raise their daughters to emulate Miley Cyrus and have babies with black men. UK is a nation where people are jailed for tweets, and there is an entire litany of 'hate crimes' — concocted by Jews and homos mostly — that effectively shuts down free speech and freedom of assembly. Anti-War voices don't look to Iran as some utopia. They believe the West has no moral qualification to be pushing others around. What is truly 'pozzed' is how so many whites in the West cuck to Jewish Supremacism. To the extent that Iran, for all its problems, has remained outside the globo-homo orbit and defies the Jew-run West, it is deserving of respect.

More utter BS from Frank Burton. If Mexico declared itself an ally of Iran and sent pro-Iranian forces across the border to harm Zio-American interests, you bet the US would be shutting down the border and bombing Mexico. This isn't about geographical distance but about who has the power. Jews control the US, and Jews see no sense in getting tough with Mexico because, if anything, they regard Mexico and Latin America as allies in the browning of America to reduce white power. It won't be long before it's Bye Bye Texas for the GOP. The US is at war with Iraq/Iran because Jews control the US and control its cuck-politicians. After all, if distance is the key factor in US belligerence, why doesn't it attack Israel for its war crimes, support of ISIS & terrorism, espionage against the US, ongoing occupation & oppression of Palestinians, and etc.? The reason why the US has especially been belligerent against Iran and Venezuela is because both nations are loathed by Jews who call the shots. Trump, like most US politicians, is little more than an attack dog that barks and bites for Zion.