Of late, some say there’s an internecine battle brewing within the American Right between Charlie Kirk camp and Nick Fuentes camp. In fact, the Kirk camp doesn’t stand for any kind of real right or real conservatism. Kirk is essentially a bought-and-paid-for shill, a shabbos goy of JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power. He is the ‘acceptable’ face of ‘conservatism’, toothless, gutless, and ball-less. His idea of ‘conservatism’ and ‘American values’ is forever malleable and mutable. It is whatever JSP says it is. This kind of Americanism has only one ‘bill of rights’, and it goes like this: Jews say ‘We win, you lose.’ Whatever the Jews want, they eventually get by any means necessary. Jews wanted open borders and got it. Jews wanted ‘free trade’ and got it. Jews wanted to rape the Russian economy in the 90s, and they got to do so. Jews wanted gambling to spread like a virus, and now it’s everywhere. Jews wanted pornography for children, and now there is easy access to porn by kids. Jews wanted ‘gay marriage’ and got it. Jews wanted Wars for Israel, and Middle East now lies in ruins.
Kirk stands for nothing but "I obey my Jewish masters." He is not a conservative but a con-servant of JSP. He is a CILO, or conservative-in-label-only. This is why the Kirk camp gets so triggered and antsy about the so-called ‘Groypers’(generally allied with Nicholas J. Fuentes) asking inconvenient questions. When confronted with tough questions by independent minds, the con-servants and cucks squirm like worm under a hot sun and demand what amounts to SJW-like ‘safe spaces’ from those courageous individuals who refuse to read from the preordained script. Anyway, what follows are some suggestions for ‘Groypers’ to consider in their formulation of questions in future TPUSA and other such cuckservative events.
1. When Big Banks faced financial doom in the 2008 crisis, they were bailed out by all taxpayers regardless of ideology. Right or Left, up or down, we all had to contribute taxes that bailed out Wall Street. Then, do Big Banks have the right to deny service to people based on creed or ideology? If they are bailed out by everyone, shouldn't they serve everyone?
2. Conservatives and Libertarians say private companies have the right to deny service to anyone. Does this apply even when companies are virtual monopolies and serve as de facto public space for all? Does Google, a virtual monopoly as Search Engine, have the right to rig results to favor Democrats and the Deep State over Populists and Republicans? If your answer is ‘yes’, should phone companies have the right to deny service based on creed or ideology?
Also, didn't companies like Google and Facebook become monopolies precisely because they started out by promising neutrality and fairness to all sides? After all, if Google or Facebook had declared their ideological biases from the outset and stated policies that would favor one political party over another, most conservatives would have rejected them and opted for another platform. But everyone, regardless of ideology, signed up to use Google and Facebook on the promise of fairness. So, when these companies now use their monopoly muscle to favor one side over another, it is a total breach of their terms of promise to us. They come up with ever-shifting 'terms of services', but it is they who violated the biggest term of all, that of fairness that attracted so many people to their sites on assurance of neutrality. If I gained market dominance in the ice cream industry by promising quality ice cream to everyone and then used my monopoly position to deny ice cream to certain groups, I would have violated the very principle that made me become the king of ice cream. After all, had I started my company by stating my intention of denying ice cream to certain groups, many people would never have bought ice cream from me, and my company would never have gained monopoly position. It seems Google and Facebook hustled us. They became monopolies by promising fairness to all sides, but once they had the muscle, they decided to favor one side over others. Big Tech companies treat us like Zionists treat Palestinians in Occupied West Bank where Jews get the best land and most water while Palestinians get far less or none at all.
3. When true conservatives and dissident rightists are deplatformed or denied service by monopolies, the reply of cuckservatives is, "They’re private companies, and they can do whatever they want." But if monopolies were to deny service to Zionists on grounds that Zionism is about the destruction of Palestinian nation and culture, would people like you and Charlie Kirk just shrug your shoulders and say private companies can do as they wish? I’d wager people like you will insist that the state must step in to make sure every private firm is open to business with Israel. If the private sector can do as it wishes, why do cuckservatives support state-sanctioned suppression of BDS that calls for justice for Palestinians who are living under apartheid conditions in West Bank and being mowed down by IDF death squads in Gaza? Why shouldn't private individuals and companies choose not to do business with Israel for the same reason that many chose not to do business with Apartheid South Africa in the 1980s? It's funny that cuckservatives defend the right of mega-corporations to sanction little people but never defend the right of private individuals and small businesses to reject business with Israel on account of its international crimes. There is a definite pattern here. Cuckservatism is about corporate domination over little individuals. Its position is monopoly companies can deny service to little individuals, but little individuals cannot say NO to business with the gangster state of Israel.
4. Mass Immigration of peoples from Europe into the New World led to what some call the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians. Also, mass-immigration of whites, blacks, and Asians led to the native people of Hawaii being reduced to a minority in their own ancestral homeland. Mass-immigration of Jews into Palestine led to the Nakba Pogroms that reduced Palestinians to a minority in Israel and an occupied people in West Bank, which continues to be colonized by caravans of Zionist invaders. And Serbs lost their historical homeland of Kosovo permanently to Albanians because of massive Muslim migration under Ottoman Rule. While it’s true that immigration led to rise of new civilizations, there is no doubt it also led to tragedies of natives and indigenous folks losing their land and culture to others. Thus, isn’t it about time to admit the connection between mass immigration, a form of demographic imperialism, with what is tantamount to ‘genocide’ in the long run? Just ask the Palestinians. By the way, since white people took the New World from the indigenous folks, they have a moral obligation to those native people but to peoples all over the world whose lands were NOT taken by whites. And if whites really care about the American Indians, the most tragic people of the New World, then they will stop mass-immigration and do their utmost to revive and restore American Indian communities.
5. We’ve been told by the Mass Media and Mass Education/Indoctrination that ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’? First, isn’t Diversity in the New World the product of imperialism, conquest, genocide, and slave trade? Native reds and browns were conquered by whites. That led to Diversity #1. Then, Latin whites, Anglos, and Jews brought over black African slaves. That led to Diversity #2. Then, white elites called on more mass-immigration to pan out and take all the lands from the native peoples. That was Diversity #3.
Second, if Diversity is a panacea for all problems and if it is no problem for the US to become a white-minority nation, then how come white-minority nations of Latin America with so much racial diversity are relative failures, and why are people in those nations running away from their own diversity to come to the US or Canada that are still majority white? Also, we are told that India is a very diverse place. If so, it must be a wonderful, magical place. And yet, it seems countless Indians want to flee from the Diversity in India and come to UK, US, Australia, and Canada that are white majority nations. What gives? It seems people in very diverse nations want to flee from the chaos of diversity and come to white majority nations that are, as yet, less corrupt and better-managed.
6. It’s been said that white people who want to maintain the racial and cultural integrity of their own nations are ‘white supremacists’. But why are they so characterized when they only want to preserve what is theirs and have no interest in ruling over other peoples? Aren’t the real ‘white supremacists’ all those non-whites who want to run away from their own people, culture, and nation to go live in white-majority nations? It seems those non-white immigrants prefer white people as rulers, neighbors, friends, associates, lovers, and mates OVER their own kind. If non-whites want to permanently flee their own peoples and cultures to come to live in white majority nations, don’t they prefer whites over their own kind? Thus, aren’t they the ‘white supremacists’ because they see whites as preferable and superior to their own kind and other non-white folks? After all, non-whites don’t want to move to non-white nations, especially black ones.
7. Jews in the academia and media bitch and whine about whites all the time. They even created something called ‘whiteness studies’. Most Jews are globalists and push for globo-homo, replacist immigration in goy nations, and vice industries such as gambling, pornography, and drugs. Jewish Hollywood routinely features whites as villains and evildoers, the ones to blame for all the problems of the world. If Jews feel this way about whites and if they insist that Diversity is so great, why have Jews historically followed after whites and chosen to live in white-majority nations? Who’s stopping Jews from moving to more diverse nations of Latin America or India? Why don’t Jews in white nations all move to black Africa or Muslim nations if they have so many issues with whites while claiming to just love non-whites? If Jews prefer non-whites and love immigration, how about they become immigrants to non-white nations. They can have the cake and eat it too. They get to be immigrants again and can forever live with non-whites than with baddy bad whites.
8. Jews often invoke the history of Europeans and Christianity to guilt-bait whites into a position of moral inferiority vis-a-vis Jews. Now, it’s true that Europeans and Christianity have had a blood history, but then, so have all other peoples. If whites must be reminded of their bloody history, isn’t it about time to remind Jews of their genocidal role in Bolshevik communism, their prominent role in the Atlantic Slave Trade(especially to Latin America), their financial funding of Western Imperialism, their selling of opium to the Chinese, their looting of the Russian economy in the 90s(that led to the rise of Putin who put an end to it), and their mass pogroms against the Palestinians that led to Nakba?
9. If people like you and Charlie Kirk believe in equal justice for all, how come you're so silent about how people like Arnon Milchan, who freely admitted that he spied and stole for Israel, can visit the US and walk freely without consequences? How come so many of the crooks pardoned by presidents have been Jewish ones? Think of Marc Rich and Jonathan Pollard. Think of the Jewish crook(who facilitated illegal immigration and exploited workers) pardoned by Trump. It seems Jews are above the law and have a license to steal and kill. Also, if people like you and Kirk believe in colorblind justice for all of humanity, why do you favor Zionist occupiers over Palestinian occupied in the West Bank? Palestinians lost the bulk of their homeland in the Nakba Pogroms of 1948, and Zionist caravans continue to steal land & water from Palestinians in the West Bank, but US politicians only praise and serve Israel.
10. If diversity is so important that we need Affirmative Action for less qualified blacks in higher education, why doesn’t anyone make the same case for sports? NBA and NFL are black-dominated even though blacks are 13% of US population. There are some whites but virtually no brown Mexicans, Asians, and Muslims. Sports are a national pastime and a hugely symbolic part of Americanism, and yet, there isn’t much diversity in sports. Should there be affirmative action for sports for the sake of 'diversity'? And do you think NBA and NFL teams will be better if they added more Asians, Hindus, Muslims, and Mexicans to the mix? After all, we are told ‘diversity is our strength.’
11. Charlie Kirk and others like him have said America is an idea. They say 'gay marriage' is American Ideal. Then, does that mean America was not America prior to the rise of globo-homo values? They say America is about freedom and democracy. Then, was America not 'America' when it had slavery? They say America is about respect for life. Then, was America not 'America' when American Indians were being wiped off the Great Plains to make way for endless waves of immigrant-invaders? Was America not 'America' when women didn't have the vote?
If the military were to take power in America tomorrow, would America no longer be 'America' because of demise of democracy? If so, what would America be? Isn't a nation what it is regardless of ideology, e.g. Russia was Russian prior to communism, during communism, and after communism. Likewise, America is America regardless of ideology or 'ideas' as long as its historic people make up its core populace.
Also, if America is about democracy and individual liberty, is any nation with democracy and individual liberty also 'America'? If America is an idea, then surely any people and place that practices the same ideas must also be 'America'. Mexican constitution is virtually identical to the US Constitution, and Mexico has democratic elections. So, is it also 'America'?
Finally, if America is an idea, then surely you know that ideas can go from place to place. People don't need to come to America to have American values and ideas since they can adopt and practice those ideas in their own nations. If someone invents a way to make fire, you don't need to stand where he is at to have the fire. You can learn the trick and make fire in your own place. So, if America is an idea, that idea can be adopted by any people anywhere around the world, and there is no need for all of them to come to America to enjoy 'American Ideas'. Ideas can come to you; you don't have to come to the place where the idea originated.
12. Can you repeat these historical truths? American Indians were wiped out by mass immigration. Blacks were once slaves in America. Jewish communists played a key role in Bolshevism that led to deaths of tens of millions of Christian Slavs. US aided Zionists in the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map even though Palestinians did no harm to America.
13. Do you believe that American ideas and values are so outstanding that they should be adopted by all peoples around the world? Should they be the beacon of hope for all mankind? Does this include Israel? Should it also have 'gay marriage', deracination, and inclusive-invasive mass-immigration from all over the world?
14. People like you and Charlie Kirk say that we should support Israel because it tolerates and even celebrates homos and trannies. People like you say neighboring Muslim nations throw homos off roofs. But facts say otherwise. Israel is closely allied with Saudis that execute homosexuals. Also, Israel lent support to ISIS fighters in Syria who really do throw homos off roof-tops. Israel aided ISIS and Alqaeda against the Assad regime that is a tolerant, secular, and modernizing force in the Arab world. How do you square these contradictions?
15. Given that Jewish takeover of Palestine led to some of the biggest 'gay' & 'tranny' parades, orgies, and celebrations in the world, do you think Israel should now be called 'Sodom and Gomorrah'? Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah. Is that something Christian Zionists should celebrate? Did Jews really need to retake the Holy Land because having mass homosexual orgies there is the spiritual and moral priority of Christian Zionists?
There was a time when Jews were associated with defense of unfettered free speech. Many Americans were fooled that those Jews stood on principle. As it turned out, Jews defended Free Speech from the onset of the Cold War to around the mid-80s(when they realized they had near-total lock on higher institutions) because so many Jews were communists and radicals whose values and agendas were at odds with mainstream society. Also, Jews were seeking to legalize porn to (1) rake in huge profits from goyim (2) commoditize white women into marketable meat and (3) undermine manners and norms that strengthened the moral fiber of goy communities. Jews pushed pornography just like the Sackler Dynasty peddled opioids and other dangerous drugs. Back then, as Jews lacked total control of the institutions — and because considerable authority & influence still remained with the Catholic Church, religious organizations, patriotic/conservative groups, and family-centered America — , they felt they had no choice but to push for Total Freedom of Speech. Under the guise of Free Speech as a Constitutional principle, Jews could push radical agendas and seek to legalize pornography(and also break down the barriers between pornography and mainstream culture). Jews even had some of their own infiltrate or organize Neo-Nazi groups and stir up lots of noise. Then, the ACLU, to burnish its credentials as a champion of freedom, would do some token defending of these far-right groups. It created the impression that Jews are so idealistic that they will even go so far as to defend their arch-enemies, the Nazis. In the video below, we see the last time the ACLU stood for unfettered free speech for all. It is now totally with the PC witch-hunters.
The truth has been out of the bag for some time, especially with the rise of PC. Jewish passion for Free Speech was all just a ruse. The reason why Jews once feigned concern for Free Speech was to push their radical, tribal, and pornographic agendas. But once they gained dominant power, they had NO INTENTION of defending free speech for all. (Incidentally, a crucial reason why the period from the late 60s to the mid 80s was the Golden Era of Free Speech was because everything was in a state of flux or limbo. Neither Conservatives nor Liberals had total lock on morality, values, institutions, and message. The 60s and even the 70s were a time of both Abbie Hoffman and John Wayne. Traditional forces were waning but not yet finished, and Jews were on the rise but not yet totally dominant. And the Boomer generation, that staked itself on rebellion against the Man, wanted to believe itself to be agents for greater freedom. And yet, its self-image as the progressive & radical generation increasingly led it toward Political Correctness. In ALL IN THE FAMILY, both Archie and Meathead are for and against Free Speech in their own way. Archie is more open to crude speech about different racial, national, and religious groups, but he will defend suppression of anti-American radical speech. Meathead is, at least in principle, for Free Speech, but his holier-than-thou attitude presages the rise of Political Correctness. If he had to choose between right to free speech and righteous outrage, we know he’ll opt for the latter.)
Anyway, here we are in the 21st century, and Jews have total lock on just about all institutions and industries that matter. They control elite academia(that sets the template for rest of schooling, from state colleges to kindergarten). They control big media(which are essentially propaganda wing of the Deep State that is also controlled by Jews). They control top law firms and courts that decide who will be prosecuted and who will be let off easy. (Ever notice how the Power treats Antifa and Proud Boys differently? If Antifa attacks and the Proud Boys fight back, the latter is prosecuted. It's like how Israeli Justice System favors Zionist invaders in West Bank over displaced and brutalized Palestinians. Jews see whites as White Palestinians.) Jews control Wall Street and play caesar on who gets financing and who doesn’t. Jews control all the big social platforms either by direct ownership or through their proxy organizations such as SPLC and ADL that get to monitor who gets to remain on Twitter or who gets to sell books on Amazon. And there is an annual Nuremberg Rally in the US called the AIPAC Conference where goy-whore-politicians gather to pledge everlasting loyalty to Israel as the 10,000 yr Reich of the Jews.
Now, one might think that Jews would be more easy-going with their immense power. After all, if Jews were for Free Speech when they had considerably less power in the 50s and 60s, wouldn't they be for more free speech now since they are safe and secure as the dominant elites with so much money and power? Evidently not. If anything, becoming the New Ruling Elites of the US(and by extension the World) has paradoxically made Jews even more paranoid and hysterical. Jews are now spoiled and intoxicated with power. They no longer worry about discrimination or pogroms, let alone survival. They no longer worry about country clubs and whom they can marry. They are now addicted to supremacist power and adulation by goyim. They demand to be worshiped as demigods. It must be filet mignon and champagne at every meal. Anything less is an insult to their ego and pride. Today, 'antisemitism' means denying Jews their supremacist privilege as an eternal right.
Then, it's hardly surprising that Jews seem more nervous, anxious, and deranged than ever. They must have everything.
That said, in a way, Jews are being smart. After all, Anglo-American elites(aka Wasps) who were once the ruling elites rested on their laurels, felt secure in their power, and got to behaving magnanimously. Well, what became of them? They were ruthlessly deposed, decapitated, and castrated by resentful Jewish upstarts, much like how the trusting Trojans were destroyed by the Greeks who emerged out of the Wooden Horse. So, the ruling class must never take its power for granted, especially in a diverse nation with many contending tribes. Granted, only Jews could have pulled it off because they had the combination of high IQ, strong personality, intense tribalism, resentment & vengefulness(toward Christian Society), and the clever ploy of ‘Holocaust Guilt’ to use as moral shield against criticism of Jewish Power. Jews make a big deal about how the US went from ‘white supremacism’ to a land of ‘diversity and equality’, but in the upper echelons of power the US had only two elites: the Wasps and Bugs(Busy-Urban-Globalist-Semites). At the top, the power went from Anglo-Germanic elites(and Waspized Catholic Irish) to Jewish elites, and most of Diversity has merely been a political weapon used by Jews against White Power. Jews are UNWILLING to share power with Diversity. Diversity is merely their cudgel or attack dog. Just look how Jews responded to Ilhan Omar and non-white critics of Israel who support the BDS Movement.
Because Jews are so powerful, they fear becoming the focus of goy ire because, after all, it is natural for the masses to blame the ruling class for most of the macro-problems. (When Wasps were at the top, Jews surely allied with various groups, including with white ethnics and Catholics, to blame and excoriate the Anglo-American elites for EVERYTHING.)
Jewish elites especially feel nervous and paranoid because Jews don’t have the numbers. Jews are merely 2% of the US population. At the very least, Anglo-Germanic-Celtic-American elites had vast support among white gentiles. (And even non-Anglo-Germanic-Celtic white Americans became effectively Anglo-Americanized in due time. Polish-Americans and others joined with White Christian/Gentile America.) In contrast, Jewish elites feel like the British overlords in Asia, Africa, and the Near East. They have the ruling power but not the numbers to back them up. When nationalist passions began to stir in British colonies, the British ruling class was effectively doomed, the most famous case being India’s independence from the Empire in 1948. Soon thereafter, the natives in other British colonies also clamored for independence and liberation, and the British were expelled from most of their colonies(like Jews had been expelled from so many nations, though, granted, the British weren’t as hated by the locals as the Jews were through the ages. Indeed, once British imperialism ended, the locals were happy to have British return as tourists and businessmen. And many longed to move to Great Britain.) The rise of Jewish power has been spectacular, but the fall could be likewise, and that is what Jews fear. It is because Jews lack the numbers. If many people come to realize Jewish elites rule America and, furthermore, tend to be exploitative, parasitic, venal, and mendacious than decent, kind, generous, and magnanimous, the tide could turn. White Americans who’ve come to regard Jews as wise and tragic Holy Holocaust people can come to see them as a bunch of a**holes. This is why Jews seek to increase Goy Diversity so as to play various groups against one another. The great irony is that, even though Jews use Diversity against whites, whites are still the most pro-Jewish group in the US while many members of Diversity aren’t so keen on Jews or even hate them. Also, because many non-whites are recent arrivals, they’ve been less acculturated to the American neo-religion of Jew-Worship. Furthermore, non-whites are encouraged by Jewish elites to hate white people as ‘racist oppressors’, but non-whites often can’t distinguish between whites and Jews. In many cases, they notice that Jews are the richest and most powerful whites, not least because Jews seem to have so many whites & Christians singing endless hosannas to Israel. Also, even as Jews dump on Donald Trump, he seems to love Jews more than any other people and seems so chummy with Bibi Netanyahu of ‘far-right’ Israel. Jews tell Diversity to hate the GOP, but the GOP says it loves Jews and Israel more than the Democrats do. If GOP is the party of ‘racist whites’, and if those evil whites love Israel so much(more than even America), where do Jews fit into all this?
Anyway, Jews now have near-total power, and that is why they fear Free Speech. Free Speech means the freedom of the powerless to have their say, and it has been greatly amplified by the power of the internet, especially the rise of social media and video platforms. So, even though Jews still have control of dominant institutions, their agenda can be upended by certain individuals. Take someone like Pewdiepie who started out as a nothing, a nobody. Prior to the internet age, he would have been some eccentric kid on the block. But he began to develop a massive following, and his videos are now seen by tens of millions of people.
Mark Dice, Paul Joseph Watson, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, Ramzpaul, Black Pigeon Speaks, Jared Taylor, Roosh, Stefan Molyneux, J.F. Gariepy, Ryan Dawson, Vincent James, Nick Fuentes, Steve Turley, and etc. are individuals without institutional power, but their messages sometimes reach a larger audience than well-funded enterprises and organizations do. So, someone with a compelling message and a webcam can be more effective as a conveyer of ideas and messages than well-paid talking heads of MSM who, in order to keep their paychecks, must toe the Party Line. Because individuals are not doing it for money(or for far less than MSM talking heads are), they are freer to say what’s on their minds. They cannot get fired.
And this is why Jewish Power has decided to DEPLATFORM such individuals by using the most Kafkaesque means. When Franz Kafka wrote THE TRIAL and THE CASTLE, he surely didn’t mean them to be used as manuals of power(or maybe his Jewish subconscious did), but that’s what they became in the hands of Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, and etc. These oligarchies always begin by claiming to ban ‘extremist hate speech’ such as praise for Hitler and denial of Shoah, but then the rules get murkier and murkier to the point where even Faith Goldy is de-personed because she thinks mass-immigration-invasion will destroy the Canada that she loves. In many cases, the oligarchies give no clear reason as to WHY someone was denied service or offer the most ludicrous highfalutin explanation, like when Sargon was kicked off Patreon.
Some say the current censorship is ‘anti-conservative’, and even though it’s true that those on the ‘right’ suffer more, it also depends on ethno-centrism. After all, BDS is usually associated with the Left, but it’s been hammered by Jewish power, while Israel, ruled by a ‘far-right’ regime, is favored by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and etc. It doesn’t matter what kinds of international crimes Israel commits against Palestinians or neighbors. The fact is the so-called ‘leftist’ big-shots at Google, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and etc. gladly work closely with ‘right-wing’ Israel. Why? Because it’s Jews working with Jews. Unlike stupid whites who put ideology before identity, Jews are smart enough to know that identity is more important than ideology in the game of power. Rachel Maddow is said to be a ‘progressive’, but she is a warmongering bitch who serves the Deep State that is in bed with ‘far-right’ Israel. Meanwhile, she denounces left-wing Venezuela. Among Jews, ‘left’ vs ‘right’ is merely a diversion. What matters most to Jews is ‘us’ vs ‘them’. This is why, if Jews use Diversity against whites to advantage Jewish power, whites must grow a pair and use Diversity against Jews in kind. Fight fire with fire. But sadly, even as Jews tell the Diversity Dog to bite whitey, the whitey tries to defend Jews from the Diversity Dog(ordered by Jews to bite whitey). The current White Strategy is the most retarded in human history. Imagine someone beating you with a cudgel and you try to defend him from the very cudgel that he is using to clobber you with. Whites are into the ‘cuckgel’. It’s no wonder Jews feel such contempt for white goy cucks.
In essence, Jews now fear Free Speech because it speaks truth to Jewish Power, which happens to be in supremacist, hegemonist, and even genocidal mode: Wars for Israel and White Nakba(or reduction of whites into reviled & dehumanized minorities in nations of their origins or founding). But because few people will support suppression of Free Speech as criticism of the Powers-that-be, Jews have associated Free Speech with ‘hate’, ‘extremism’, ‘Holocaust Denial’, and ‘white supremacism’. Now, of course, there are those who misuse Free Speech to spew nonsensical bigotry, demented ideas, and crazy notions(like some of the more outlandish theories about 9/11 and the Moon landing). And some like Alex Jones made their reputations through sensationalism.
But, denunciation of hatred, contempt, and extremism is rich coming from Jews who control the music industry and fill the airwaves & TV screens with ugly rap, demeaning lyrics, and skanky idolatry. It’s rich coming from Jews who control Hollywood and made so many movies about subhuman ‘rednecks’ and psychotic Muslims(nearly all of whom are terrorists). It’s rich coming from Jews who control MSM and have promoted endless hate propaganda against Russians, Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, Venezuelans, Chinese, and etc. According to some Neocon Zionists, the US should brace for World War III, IV, V, and etc. because it’s the destiny of the ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ America to remain the lone superpower forever(esp in service to its Jewish Overlords). A Jewess like Madeleine Albright can say it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children and still be honored by the Establishment. (But if US were to place sanctions on Israel for its illegal Occupation of West Bank and if only 100 Jewish kids died as a result, there would be outrage about Another Holocaust.)
Jewish Power uses extortion rackets like SPLC and ADL(in collusion with the Jew-run Media and platforms) to create the impression that Evil People are using Free Speech to spread ‘hate’, ‘extremism’, and etc. By emphasizing the antics of a handful of self-professed Neo-Nazis and KKK, the Jew-run media create the impression that the US is on the precipice of a ‘fascist’ takeover led by ‘white supremacist’ Donald Trump(while overlooking the fact that, if Trump has been supremacist on anything, it’s been for Zionism Uber Alles and ‘Muh Holocaust’). The very Jews who spread the rancid paranoid hysteria over Russia Collusion and, before that, the lies about WMD(to ignite the Iraq War) are lecturing to us about hatred. And notice that the term ‘White Supremacism’ doesn’t apply only to Neo-Nazis or some such ilk. Jews say that, due to the history of White Supremacism, any sign of white identity, interests, or sovereignty is ‘white supremacist’. Never mind that European Imperialism was often financed by Jewish bankers such as the Rothchilds. If white imperialism was supremacist, then Jewish role in it was also supremacist. Also, Jews played a huge role in the slave trade in the New World. And Jews were the main sellers of opium to the Chinese. And Jews funded the arms industry that led to various wars killing millions. And of course, Jews also played a key role in communism that destroyed millions of more lives.
Now, it’s true that many European Jews got burned in World War II, but then, people who play with fire can get seriously hurt. Why did so many innocent Germans, Russians, and Japanese also perish in the war? Because their elites all played with fire. Though Adolf Hitler was the main driver of events, would the National Socialists have come to power if Jews hadn't played a key role in communism(and its killing of millions before WWII) and Weimar degeneracy & depression that alienated and angered so many Germans? So, Jews weren’t merely innocent victims of World War II. Sure, many innocent Jewish civilians were killed by Hitler’s madness, but the Germans were driven to follow a mad man because their nation was, to a large extent, wrecked by a mad people, the Jews. Jewish behavior in Russia of the 90s offers a clue as to how Jews operate in times of crisis. Instead of trying to fix the problem and set things right, their main focus is to grab as much loot for themselves. While it’s true that many innocent Germans and Japanese(women and children especially) perished in World War II, it’s a fact that their leadership led them down a dangerous path. It’s a sad fact of history that when the elites go bad, the people suffer, indeed often more than the elites do. While some German and Japanese elites were hanged after trial, the far bigger victims were German and Japanese civilians who were firebombed and burned alive. And in Middle East Wars, the rotten US elites haven’t suffered one bit while tens of thousands of American soldiers(mostly white men) have been either killed or crippled for life(with many choosing to take their own lives). Likewise, many innocent and decent Jews perished in World War II because too many Jewish elites were the scum of the earth. Now, are the people entirely innocent? After all, the German and Japanese people supported their mad regimes. And too often, the Jewish masses stood by their elites. We see this everyday in the US and EU. Most Jews side with scum like George Soros. They cheer on Wars for Israel and call for White Replacement. They support ADL and SPLC that spew anti-white hatred. So, even ‘innocent’ Jews aren’t entirely innocent, just like all those Germans who either supported Hitler or failed to resist were partly culpable for what happened. And for that reason, the fate of Jews in World War II has to be seen within the larger context of grim history where, too often, the people perish along with the elites(or perish while the elites get off scot-free). After all, elites face the music ONLY IF they lose power. Josef Stalin also played a key role in the events that led to World War II. He allied with Hitler in the destruction of Poland and was willing to provide war material to Germany as long as the war was on the Western front. But as he was ultimately victorious, he never had to face justice, and it was the Soviet peoples who suffered mightily as the result of his playing with fire with political pyromaniac Hitler.
Whenever Jews kvetch about ‘white supremacism’, whites need to point to countless examples of Jews taking part in it, financing it, profiteering off it, and aiding & abetting it in myriad ways to squeeze out advantages for themselves. Take the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians. Massive Immigration-invasion by Europeans(and Jews) led to the destruction of native Indian communities & cultures across America. Jews totally took part in it. Jewish merchants sold guns to white cowboys to kill Indians with. And in the American South, Jews handled the money of the slave trade and slave plantations. And Jews disproportionately owned more slaves than whites did. Jews played an even bigger role in Brazilian slavery, the biggest slave enterprise in the New World. There was Jewish banking money behind British, French, and German imperialism. And Jews were the main sellers of opium to the Chinese. So, modern Jewish history is inseparable from ‘white supremacist’ history. Also, the main vehicle of ‘white supremacism’ was Western Imperialism(partially but substantially funded by Jews), and the biggest threat to ‘white supremacist’ imperialism was the rising nationalism of non-whites who resisted. Much of modern history can be understood in terms of supremacism-via-imperialism and sovereignty-via-nationalism. Now, have Jews been more for imperialism or nationalism? Jews have usually sided with the imperialists because their financial ambitions have been worldwide. In order to penetrate and profiteer from various markets, Jews needed to weaken the national sovereignty of peoples around the world and support imperialism as the means of hegemony. So, Jewish history has been very much linked with ‘white supremacy’.
Furthermore, Jewish immigration patterns have always followed in the footsteps of ‘white supremacists’. So, if whites conquered and gained mastery over non-white peoples, Jews followed along to profit off the opportunity created by ‘white supremacists’. Look at the Jewish monopoly of diamond mines and markets in South Africa. Indeed, where would Jewish Power be without the ‘white supremacist’ horse to ride on? If not for white imperialism and conquest of New World, Africa, Asia, and Middle East, Jews could not have made their vast fortunes. The Sassoon family that made a killing by selling opium to the Chinese rode on the horse of British ‘white supremacist’ imperialism. And how was the Zionist Project realized? Jewish bankers bribed British Imperialists to declare Palestine as a future Jewish state. And then, Jews pulled the strings in UK, Germany, USSR, and the US to get their way with Palestinians who were eventually expelled from their homeland in the tragic Nakba pogroms that were clearly Jewish-supremacist-and-imperialist. So, whenever Jews bitch about ‘white supremacism’, we need to tell them to shut the f*** up because Jews have been the biggest leeches of ‘white supremacism’.
But Jews, having no sense of honor or principles, try to have the cake and eat it too. Jews followed white conquests & discoveries(at the expense of non-whites) and took advantages of opportunities to enrich themselves(often far more than what whites got), but then, Jews also excoriated white people for their ‘historical sins’ of mistreating non-whites. Imagine that. Jews funded and followed white conquests and filled up their bellies and sacks, BUT they act like they are moral saints with some God-given right to pass judgement on others. The nerves. The chutzpah. Imagine you go hunting for a moose. And a Jew follows you and gives lend a hand at times. And when you bring down the moose, the Jew joins you in gorging on its meat. But then, the Jew wants all of the kill, and so, what does he do? He begins to berate you as a heartless hunter and ‘human supremacist’ killer of the poor noble moose. Therefore, you deserve NOTHING more of the moose, all of which is to be claimed by the Jew. Yes, that is how dirty and vile Jews play the game of history. Jews grab-and-take on the basis of bottomless greed but then pontificate from the highest perch. They act like Harvey Weinstein but sermonize like they’re Moses or something. They play prophets-for-profits.
What Jews fear most is not ‘white supremacism’ because, deep down inside, they know very well that most whites are not into supremacism or imperialism. Most whites believe the Age of Empire is long over, and their only wish is to have peace and prosperity in their own nations. When the French, British, Dutch, Spanish, and other empires fell, most Europeans went back home. And after the Cold War, the understanding was that Russians, Americans, and the rest of the world would mind their own business, and stability would prevail around the world. But then, guess which people hated the future vision of sovereign nations(except for Israel of course). Jews hated it because most nations are majority gentile. If every gentile nation was independent and sovereign, it’d be difficult for Jews to penetrate and take over. And so, Jews pushed the neo-imperialism of globalism that would kill two birds with one stone. Its agenda was to render the non-white world(and Russia) open to military invasion, financial takeover, and/or cultural imperialism of the US. In turn, all the West would be open to Third World mass-invasions. And of course, Jews would use homo-collaborators around the world to serve as agents. With control of the US, Jews would use American Power to pressure the rest of the world to put out to the cock of Uncle Samowicz. But lest White Americans grow discontent with playing toady-dogs to Jewish Power and say NO MORE to Jewish supremacism, Jews figured on increasing Goy Diversity so that diverse goyim will be at each other’s throats than uniting to take on Jewish supremacist power. Meanwhile, Jews could gradually recruit non-whites to fill white shoes.
But for the time being, Jews need white gentile collaboration with Jewish supremacist power because Jews cannot do all the grunt work to keep the empire going. Just like the British Imperialists in India needed local elite collaborators to run much of the system, Jews in the West rely mainly on white goy managers, supervisors, engineers, commanders, and etc. to carry much of the weight. And the only way Jews can ensure White Obeisance to Jewish Supremacism is by brainwashing whites into believing that white identity, white pride, white heritage, white consciousness, white interests, and etc. are all synonymous with ‘white supremacism’. So, even "It’s Okay to be White" = Evil White Supremacy. But in fact, Jews are really defending their own supremacism by keeping whites in submissive mode. When Jews holler, ‘white supremacism’, it’s really akin to a Southern Slave-owner denouncing a black slave who wants to be free as an ‘uppity crazy nigger’. How dare a ‘nigger’ want to be free when it’s his role in life to keep his head bowed low and serve his master, without whom he is nothing? Likewise, Jews feel, "How dare white gentiles seek emancipation, independence, autonomy, and separation from us Jews? Don’t those subhuman goy lowlifes know that they exist to SERVE us, OBEY us, KILL for us, DIE for us, SING for us, and GROVEL before us?" The fact that Facebook Jews decided to ban ‘white nationalism’ and ‘white separatism’ as synonymous with ‘white supremacism’ makes it plain as day what is really happening. The Jewish moral argument is total BS. White Nationalists, White Separatists, White Identitarians, and etc. are not, for the most part, associated with white supremacism of the Neo-Nazi or KKK school. Rather, they just want to live in a world of their own and leave other peoples alone.
So, what is the problem then? The problem is such people will not support the Jewish supremacist-imperialist Wars for Israel. They won’t support the ‘new cold war’ with Russia. They will not necessarily favor Zionists over Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians. And being conscious of their white identity, they will be sufficiently proud and independent to refuse to bow down before Jews like pathetic dogs and playing fetch. And as they want a world of their own, they will say NO to mass-immigration-invasion. But if Diversity agenda is stopped cold, it’ll be more difficult for Jews to play divide-and-rule among goyim to maintain their supremacist power over a fragmented populace. So, the Jewish War on Free Speech is not about combating White Supremacism. That's just a cover, a ruse. It’s really about safeguarding the currently dominant Jewish Supremacism by shutting down True Speech of those who dare to speak truth to Power, one that is now overwhelmingly Jewish and Globalist. Jews use their vast networks to create the illusion that most of Free Speech among ‘white nationalists’ is about praising Hitler and Holocaust, but this BS is Hollywood reality. In truth, what Jews are freaking out about is that the so-called ‘white nationalism’ is really about White National Liberation from Jewish supremacist globo-homo imperialism. It’s about the possibility of mass white-desertion from Jewish globalist hegemony that has spread homo-tranny degeneracy, Afro-thuggery, interracist pornography, child-corrupting degeneracy, Wars for Israel & deaths of countless Arabs/Muslims, Hate Propaganda against Russia & Iran, and financial robbery by Wall Street. Just like commanders in war are nothing if the soldiers desert, Jewish supremacist power is nothing if goyim, especially whites, say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and refuse to serve as the pawns of venal Jews who look upon goyim as so much cannon fodder.
Indeed, isn’t it weird how Jews do so much to defame, degrade, and denounce whites but then demand that whites stick with Jews and do their bidding? If Jews hate white people so much, why did Jewish immigration always chase after whites? Why didn’t Jews leave Europe long ago? And why didn’t Jews emigrate to Africa, Asia, or any part of the world without whites? Even today, who is forcing Jews to live in white nations? If Jews love immigration and non-whites, they can have BOTH by moving from white lands to non-white ones. But these Jews who endlessly insult and berate whites as the worst scum of the earth are always calling on whites to support Jews and bail them out. Imagine someone who spits in your face and whips you night & day but then demands that you work for him and defend him. If he hates you so much, why does he so obsessively cling to you? Why doesn’t he go his own way so that you can go your own way? Of course, he uses threat and violence against you to keep you as his servant and dog. Just like a rider or stage-coach driver must constantly remind the horse or horses that they exist to serve humans, Jews must constantly use verbal whips and harness to keep whites in line. But then, it was the same with blacks in the South. It was precisely because southern plantations depended so much on slave labor that blacks had to be kept in line to obey, pick cotton, and carry bales on their backs. If blacks weren’t made to feel inferior to whites, they might say, "Why we be doing all this shit for dat honkey-ass mofo who done hire overseers to call us ‘nigger’?" Whites had to psychologically exploit black inferiority along with threats of physical punishment to keep blacks in line. The white narrative said, "Because of the history of black ugabuga jungle savagery, blacks must understand that they need to undergo the purgatory of slavery to be shaped into hard-working, law-abiding, and constructive individuals who may one day be worthy of civilization." Whites exploited the element of Black Shame to control blacks. Today, Jews are the massuhs of globalism, and they use ‘White Guilt’ to control whites. The Jewish Narrative says, "Because whites committed so many historical ‘sins’ with genocide and slavery and racism and etc., they must reject their white identity and work for the good of all humanity, namely by serving the agenda of Jewish supremacists." Jews tell whites to drop white identity for all-humanity but then demand that they serve Jews uber alles. Bait and Switch. Jews make whites surrender 'white supremacism' for equality, only to steer the deracinated whites into serving Jewish supremacism.
Notice how devious and clever these Jews are. Jews always talk of ‘white supremacism’ as something separate from Jewish history. Jews do this by invoking the Shoah as a case of Jewish victim-hood at the hands of white ‘racist anti-Semites’. Jews also remind the world of Jewish persecution at the hands of the White Christian West. Jews don’t mention that they played a huge role in white slave trade in the Middle Ages. Jews don’t mention that they collaborated with Moorish and Turkish invaders into Europe. Jews don’t mention that they worked for European noblemen to exploit the peasantry. Jews don’t mention the fact that they lent huge sums to European monarchs and government to wage wars and conquer entire parts of the world. Jewish money played a very significant role in European Imperialism. Jewish historiography is totally selective and dishonest and completely lacking in honor. Lacking a martial culture and having developed under a merchant culture, Jews are hagglers and hustlers than men who would put their lives and reputations on the line.
Anyway, what are the 10 Reasons why Jews HATE Free Speech? Let us count the ways.
1. Jews hate Free Speech because We might call for NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL. Notice how Jews hate Tulsi Gabbard who wants to end the crazy war in Syria. Free Speech allows us to decry how Jews have been using the US military as hammer of Jewish globalist hegemony. Jews make up less than 0.3% of US military but make up more than 50% of the decision makers. And even most non-Jewish politicians take their cues from Jewish donors. So, all these Wars in the Middle East have been Wars for Israel that Jews want but we don’t want. Free Speech means we can freely notice Jewish Power and call out on its abuses. We can say NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL and no more human sacrifice of goyim as cannon fodder to serve the tribalist supremacism of Jews.
2. Jews hate Free Speech because We might denounce Israel’s use of IDF death squads to mow down Palestinian women and children who want to return to their homeland, from which their ancestors were expelled in the Nakba Pogroms. The US is supposed to have a Free Media that conveys the truth, but we don’t hear much truth from the (((media))) on the matter of Palestinians. So, IDF death squads get to commit more acts of cold-blooded murder and get away with it.
3. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak the truth about the Jewish ethno-monopoly of the media. Most of the Mass Media is owned and/or controlled by Jews. Fox News is goy-owned, but many of its top executives are Jewish, and it’s been said it is even more pro-Zionist than Jewish-owned outlets. The idea of Free Media is just that: An idea than reality. How can we have a truly Free Media when most of MSM are controlled by a handful of oligarchs, almost all of them Jewish who hire and fire people depending on how obeisant they are to Israel, Jewish Power, globo-homo propaganda, and other agendas favored by Jewish supremacist elites.
4. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak the truth about black crime. Why do Jews cover up black crime and violence? It’s because Jews use ‘white guilt’ as a form of mind-control over whites. According to the Jew-run media, blacks are either awesomely cool or tragically noble(or both), and whites must atone for their grave sins against such a wonderful & superb race. ‘White guilt’ about blacks is effective ONLY IF whites continue to see blacks as super-cool and/or saintly. In fact, as Colin Flaherty has tirelessly documented, blacks are the most violent, thuggish, demented, aggressive, arrogant, and destructive people in the US. They commit the most crime, and most non-black races have most to fear from black criminals, thugs, or bullies. Black cool is a media illusion, and black nobility is a fraud. Sure, blacks were victimized in the past, and there is a very real tragic dimension to their history in America. But it’s also true that evolution made blacks tougher, more aggressive, and more pathological. As such, they are the main predators and lunatics in American streets and schools. Jews seek to suppress free speech and true speech about blacks because they want to keep the torch of ‘white guilt’ going.
5. Jews hate Free Speech because We might call for the commemoration of Nakba Pogroms of 1948 that ethno-expelled 700,000 Palestinians from their homeland. Last year, 2018, was the 70th anniversary of Nakba, but notice that the Jewish-dominated US media totally ignored it. And when IDF death squads mowed down Palestinians who marched to the border to seek re-entry into their lost homeland, not a single American politician spoke up for the dead women and children. This is why Jews hate Free Speech. With true Free Speech, we can call upon all the good people to remember and commemorate Nakba.
6. Jews hate Free Speech because We might challenge bogus historical narratives and say that Leo Frank was guilty of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan. Jewish Power has duped us with Fake History that has portrayed Leo Frank as an innocent Jew set upon by an ‘antisemitic’ lynch mob when it was the furthest thing from the truth. If anything was ‘antisemitic’(or antisemitism-confirming), it was the behavior of the Northern Jewish Community that pulled every dirty trick in the book to clear Leo Frank of a crime he most likely committed. Jews bitch about ‘antisemitic tropes’ nowadays, but if anything perpetuates ‘antisemitic stereotypes’, it is Jewish behavior that is so often without honor & principles and will resort to any means, no matter how foul and filthy, to get their way.
7. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak about how Jews took advantage of post-communist Russia in the 1990s to economically loot the nation for the aggrandizement of limitless Jewish greed. Indeed, what Jews did to Russia of the 1990s gives us hints as to what Jews did to Germany in the Weimar Period. When Jews see a crisis, they see an opportunity. As Jews hold goyim in contempt, they don’t use the crisis for the good of all people but to fill their pockets and secure yet more advantages for themselves. They see yet another round of the Shylock Doctrine.
Because Jews own the Western Media, most people are still in the dark as to Jewish perfidy in Russia of the 90s and why Russians supported the semi-autocratic nationalist rule by Vladimir Putin who, by hook and by crook, wrested some of the power from the Jewish oligarchs who nearly came to own all of Russia and run it(mostly to the ground). Amy Chua discussed the problem in her book WORLD ON FIRE, but she’s been tamed since then into a hapless yellow dog who fetches for Jewish Power. https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/04/18/must-read-the-rape-of-russia-video/
8. Jews hate Free Speech because We might condemn Jewish organized crime and Israel as the biggest white slavers of the 21st century. Jewish gangsters have long been involved in prostitution and drugs, but Jews took this to new heights after the collapse of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. As Jews regarded these goy women as ‘shikses’(Yiddish for ‘filthy gentile whore scum animals’), the women were nothing but pieces of meat for the sex market. As there were so many poor and desperate women in Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe, Jews turned many of them into prostitutes. But even worse, many of these women were enticed to Israel for work whereupon they were forced in sexual slavery and beatings. Of course, Hollywood movies like TAKEN would have us believe that Muslims and Eastern European gentiles are behind abduction and slavery of white women, but the fact is Jews dominated the business. With Free Speech, we can speak this truth, and that’s why Jews hate Free Speech as the weapon of truth. Truth will undermine Jewish perfidy and rottenness.
9. Jews hate Free Speech because We might discuss the Jewish role in communism. While many Jewish communists were sincere and courageous in their commitment to change and progress, the radical socialist ideology as cure turned out to be worse than the disease. Also, too many Jewish Bolsheviks, flush with power and privilege, just couldn’t control their lust for ruthless violence and terror. Jewish communists especially targeted Russian Orthodox Christians and Ukrainian peasantry that had a tradition of defiance and independence. Jewish Bolsheviks played a key role in smashing 50,000 Churches in Russia and Ukraine. Also, they played a significant role in what is called the Holodomor in Ukraine where it’s been estimated that 3 to 4 million people perished due to man-made famines. While Jews were not the only people responsible for the excesses of communist horror, they played a very important part. But as Jewish control the Narrative via media and academia, we’ve been led to believe that Jews were the most tragic victims of Stalinism and Soviet tyranny, which is total baloney. While many Jews did face persecution under Stalinism and what came later, they were devoured by the very monster that they helped to create.
10. Jews hate Free Speech because We might discuss the Jewish role in the opioid crisis that, from 1997 to 2017, killed 400,000 people, the vast majority of them of the white working class. Lately, Jews in NY have been denouncing the Sacklers, but it’s like deja vu of faux Jewish outrage over Bernie Madoff. NY Jews are trying to signal that THEY had NOTHING to do with the loathsome Sacklers who, like the Jewish Sassoon Dynasty that monopolized the opium trade in China, knowingly peddled horribly addictive drugs to unsuspecting white Americans. NY Jews most likely knew all along what was going on. After all, NY is Wall Street, the financial capital of the world through which Jewish oligarchs have been raping and plundering the world. Much of the wealth in NY is ill-gotten. Consider how Wall Street made off like bandits during the housing bubble. When their dirty schemes crashed and they were faced with bankruptcy, they used their puppets in governments to bail them out, and then these Jews had another round of super-profiteering while rest of the nation was stuck in near-zero growth. Just like Madeline Albright said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children for the sake of Israel, Sacklers obviously thought it was worth it to kill 400,000 goyim(and many more as they were in the business before 1999) to rake in more billions for the Jews. Jews covered up for Bernie Madoff when he was a cash cow for them and then dumped him only when he was no longer useful. And of course, the Jew-run media spun the narrative that Madoff stole mostly from Jews when, in fact, he mostly stole from goyim to enrich Jews. His Jewish clientele lost out only in the end.
There are many more reasons why Jews hate Free Speech, and we may cover them in the future. But the important thing is to remind ourselves that when Jews say they only want to remove ‘hate’ from Free Speech, DON’T YOU BELIEVE IT. If anything, Jews aren’t fearful of Neo-Nazi or KKK crazy speech because such gives the impression that there are indeed lots of extremist people out there just itching to start World War III and the Holocaust. Deep down inside, Jews know that Neo-Nazis and KKK hardly exist, and that is why Jews fund groups like SPLC to operate like Hollywood in conjuring scary stories about Nazi or KKK under every bed or around every corner. And of course, Jews push all these Hate Hoaxes that are meant to defame whites as vandals of Jewish graves and black churches when, if anything, the majority of the much publicized ‘hate crimes’ were actually carried out by blacks and Jews. https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/18/hoax-hate-crimes-list/ The real reason why Jews seek to suppress Free Speech is no different from why the Cuban or North Korean government does. People speaking freely is a challenge to the supremacist power of the ruling elites. Just like the leaders of Cuba and North Korea want to seem infallible, Jewish Power is no different. Indeed, Jews endlessly invoke the term ‘antisemitic’ to defame and discredit ANY criticism of Jewish Power. Jews respond to criticism like Big Brother. Just like Winston Smith must love Big Brother, we must love Big Jew. If we see evidence of dominant Jewish power, it may be ‘antisemitic’ on our part... that is unless, like Joe Biden, one says everything Jews do, such as pushing ‘gay marriage’ and white replacement, is ALL FOR THE GOOD. So, that’s your choice. You must pretend Jews aren’t particularly rich and powerful, OR if you do notice Jewish wealth and power, you must blather on and on about how power and wealth in the hands of Jews can ONLY DO GOOD and NEVER DO BAD. And of course, if Jews make a big mess of something, just find a ‘scapegoy’. Iraq War go badly? Never mind the Zionists who pulled the strings and orchestrated the event. Just blame goyim Bush the dummy and Dick Cheney the gangster.
Jewish Internet Monopolies do all they can to shut down Free Speech of Americans
1. Israel was created by Nakba Pogroms that ethnically cleansed Palestinians. Also, Israel illegally occupies West Bank, into which Zionist Caravans come invading(against international law), and Palestinians can't do anything about it... just like white Americans and so many Europeans are helpless to do anything about the foreign invasion. Now, what do West Bank, Western Europe, Canada, and US have in common? Their cucked goy elites -- Fatah or Liberals or Conservatives or Democrats or Republicans -- don't represent the national aspirations of their own peoples but serve the globalist hegemony of Jewish Power that insists on Mono-Nationalism(or Nationalism and pride of Identity for Jews only) against Poly-Nationalism(or all peoples have the right of identity and nationality). White elites in the West are hardly better than dog-like elites in Hong Kong who served the British Imperialists. If anything, Western Elites are worse. At the very least, Hong Kong elites kept Hong Kong Chinese and looked forward to the day when they would take the island from the white man. In contrast, Western elites are in the process of giving away their homelands forever.
2. Biggest forms of apartheid in the US are carried out surreptitiously. Progs have mastered the art of SAYING one thing while DOING something else. It's a form of Moral Masking. It's like US imperialism justifies itself by making noises about spreading 'liberal democracy' when, in fact, these are essentially Wars for Israel and MIC(military-industrial complex). And if Western Imperialism morally justified itself in the name of spreading Christianity, now it's all about spreading globohomo. As Western elites and white people in general have been sold on the lunacy that homosexuality and tranny business = holy 'rainbow', they can't think of anything more redemptive for all of mankind that spreading the glory of Anno Sodomini, even if it means dropping tons of bombs on other nations.
Anyway, Progs practice Cryto-Apartheid or Surrepto-Apartheid via Gentric Cleansing, often spearheaded by white homos. NY elected Rudy Giuliani for two terms and Michael Bloomberg for three terms, and both went after black crime in a very big way. Clinton locked up more super-predators than anyone before or after him. Stop-and-Frisk especially targeted blacks(who commit the most crime). And push for Gentrification changed many black neighborhoods into yuppie-hipster or 'yupster' ones in DC, Chicago, San Fran, and NY. When you have lots of money and legal muscle, you can do just about anything. But lest blacks realize what is really happening, these Progs made much noise about their adoration of blacks(and promoted globohomo to push black issues to the back of the bus, ironically under the presidency of Obama the black man; but then, Jews and Homos made him, not blacks, so he owed more to globohomo than to Negro; blacks got angry about lack of attention, and Obama tried to redress this in his last 2 yrs by supporting BLM, which spiraled out of control like the Cultural Revolution; it became Criminal Revolution). The current Crypto-Apartheid is like how white people drove out the Indians but then erected Indian statues and named towns after the Red Man to lend the impression of their respect than removal of Indians. Remove the bodies while hoisting the symbol. SAY one thing and DO something else. Just like the US war machine that wages war and destruction while calling it 'pacification' campaign.
----------
We need a law against Black Rampage Denialism. Or Criminal Revolution Denialism. Due to BAMMAMA factor -- blacks are more muscular and more aggressive --, black freedom led to black bullying, battery, robbery, rape, and murder of so many whites. All over the US, stronger blacks have been terrorizing and assaulting whites, as Colin Flaherty has detailed so many times.
Yes, there was segregation in the past, but such was deemed necessary because freed blacks, being stronger and more aggressive, could act predatory against whites. And this exact thing happened since the 1960s when the Criminal Revolution took off. And things got so bad that Jewish and white liberals ran from blacks. The era of white flight or 'Exurbodus', or Exodus from Urban areas. Black Criminal Revolution effectively ethnically and racially cleansed so many whites from traditional white areas. Even as Jewish Liberals denounced Segregation in the South, they joined(even spearheaded) the Exurbodus to flee black criminality and thuggery(and to prevent their children being bullied by blacks in schools). This wasn't official segregation as in the South but effectively the same thing.
And how did rich whites and Jews retake downtown areas of cities? They used economic and legal muscle to tear down housing projects, drive blacks out to lesser suburbs and small towns. They boosted property values so that only globalist yupsters could afford them.
----------
Why is the American South especially targeted for ideological abuse? If Confederate Flags, Symbolism, and Ceremonies must be suppressed because of their association with slavery, why is it okay to celebrate cowboys and the Wild West? After all, one could associate all that with 'genocide' of the Indians? Weren't a lot of Indians killed by guns? Maybe the Winchester 73 should be banned(and M-16 and Helicopters should be banned for their association with 'genocide' of Vietnamese in the Vietnam War). And 20% of cowboys were black, and that means lots of blacks also killed Indians. Jewish merchants sold guns and supplies to the pioneers of Manifest Destiny.
Also, didn't mass immigration from the Old World lead to more wars against Indians, effectively leading to their 'genocide' and expulsion from their sacred lands? The US flag can be construed as a symbol of conquest, invasion, imperialism, and 'genocide' against the natives of America, just like the Israeli Flag can be conflated with Nakba pogroms and 'genocidal' erasure of Palestine -- by the U.N'.s own definition of 'genocide', Nakba was clearly an official genocide. Statue of Liberty should be dismantled if we follow this line of moral logic. Though originally erected as a tribute to US freedom, it came to symbolize immigration. But it was immigration that destroyed the native peoples and cultures of America.
Now, it's my understanding that genocide is worse than slavery. Then, why all this celebration of the Statue of Liberty that symbolizes Mass-Immigration-Invasion that reduced Indians to wretched huddled masses, as opposed to all the vitriol spewed against the Confederacy? Was black slavery worse than Indian 'genocide'? If anything, it seems the South treated the blacks better than Northern Whites treated the Indians(and it was the North that spearheaded and financed most of the imperialist Manifest Destiny) -- also, politicians of the US North supported white elites in Latin America who employed 'death squads' to carry out near-genocidal campaigns against browns. Furthermore, what about all the US memorials to wars? Many US wars were imperialist in character and agenda. Taking SW territories from Mexico. Invading Philippines. Committing war crimes against Japan and Germany. Interfering and killing millions in Korea and Vietnam. Using worst kind of mendacity to destroy Iraq, Libya, Syria, and etc. It seems the US military has a lot of imperialist, even genocidal, blood on its hands. (Ironically, Obama's war on Libya led to open black slave markets over there.) So, how about tearing down all War Memorials as reprehensible tributes to US soldiers who took part in Imperialism and even near-genocidal acts?
American Indians were destroyed by imperialism and mass-immigration. Millions of innocents were killed abroad by US military machine and Wars for Israel. And yet, we must celebrate immigration. We must wave the flag and support the troops(not least because globo-homo Libs are now the biggest warmongers). Why? One reason is Proggism is actually 'sympa-supremacist'(or supremacist in selective sympathy that favors certain groups over others). Proggism is not animated by fairness or principles toward ALL peoples. Just ask the Palestinians and White Americans if they get a fair deal from Current Globalism? Current Proggism is about the idolatrous worship of Jews, blacks, and homos above all.
Why those three? One reason is Jewish control of media and academia. So, Jews control the narrative and decide who is holy, who is unholy. Jews naturally favored themselves. And they favored homos as a talented elite-minority. Jewish power and Homo power together posit the New Normal of Elite Minority Privilege uber super-majority goyim and super-majority straights. Jews chose blacks for two reasons. Profitability as Jews have raked in many billions off black sports, black music, and black sex. The other reason is Jews can use blacks to guilt-bait white Americans(with slavery consecrated as the 'original sin' of America even though the 'genocide' of Indians predated slavery), thus paralyzing white identity & pride and manipulating whites into serving the Other(mainly Jews) as atonement. Why do Jews make a bigger deal about blacks than about American Indians? After all, weren't Indians 'genocided'? But concentrating on the Indian Tragedy isn't good for Jewish interests. After all, Jews gained so much from Immigration. So, the notion of "immigration = 'genocide' of Indians" is problematic to Jews. Also, Jews have always owned Hollywood and made so many Westerns where Indians are little more than shooting ducks, and that makes Jews culpable in spreading 'hate' against Indians. And what Jews did to Palestinians is eerily similar to what was done to the Indians.
Another reason is that blacks are a more vocal and expressive people than the Indians. So, their hysterics make for better theater than the relative stoicism of the Indians. Also, as blacks have gained so much success in sports, music, and sex -- the three things Americans are most obsessed about -- , they've come to be seen almost as demigods by whites in US, Canada, and Europe. A lot of 'European' sports 'heroes' are now black, and white women flock to have sex with them, and cucky white boys stand in line to get their autographs from black stars. And white youth culture is mainly white boys imitating black rappers and white girls 'twerking' while fantasizing about sex with black men.
NCAA and NFL pretty much follow the same dynamics. College sports are about adulation of blacks as local heroes, and tons of white coeds put out to them while white boys sheepishly cheer for them. NFL is about black 'heroes' winning games and humping tons of white women and about white boys worshiping black men as super-jocks and super-studs. Because whites worship black prowess in sports, black song(rap is now the biggest genre), and black sex, whites are bound to feel more guilty about having committed wrongs against blacks. It's like Christians came to feel esp guilty about the death of Jesus because the Narrative says He was no ordinary man but the Son of God. It's like people get more upset about someone killing a lion than a hyena or coyote. Lion is seen as regal, the king of the jungle. More people get upset over someone killing a whale than a pig or lamb. So, even though American Indians suffered more, they are seen as dull and boring, a mediocre or inferior people. Whites may acknowledge that Indians suffered but don't get all hung up about it. But whites feel obsessive guilt about what they'd don to blacks, the superior race of sports, song, and sex.
Jews exploit this psychology because it could be used in their favor too. The reason why the Shoah is such a big deal is not because Hitler killed a lot of innocent people. Suppose Hitler spared Jews and killed only Gypsies. While the world would acknowledge it as a tragedy, they wouldn't make a big fuss over it 24/7 because most people regard Gypsies as a bunch of losers. Also, Gypsies don't have power and money to control media and set the Narrative. But Jews are talented and gained tremendous wealth to dominate media and academia. Also, precisely because Jews have demonstrated their mental prowess in science, medicine, letters, humor, business, entertainment, and etc, white people have come to regard Jews with awe, as the god-men of mind, wit, and soul. So, the Holocaust is seen as something even worse than a mass-killing of people. It's seen as something akin to Deicide, the murder of a godlike race of people.
Progs pretend to be about equality, but they are very selective and supremacist in their sympathies. Proggism is Sympa-Supremacist or Compassion-Supremacist where just a few groups are favored to hog and command most of the collective sympathy. Jews over Palestinians. Jews of Shoah over Ukrainians of Holodomor. Blacks over American Indians. Homos over straights. (Homos are revered for their style and vanity in current culture that is mainly geared toward narcissism and celebrity mania.) And of course, Diversity over Indigeneity.
Diversity is the product of Imperialism that destroyed Indigeneity. After all, the only reason why Hawaii is diverse is because whites conquered and then allowed mass immigration-invasion from Asia. So, the natives of Hawaii -- the REAL Hawaiians -- have been reduced to pitiful minority status in their own homeland. Indigenous people lost out to diverse invasive peoples. It is a sign of utter cognitive dissonance that progs say they are for both Indigeneity and Diversity. They are such idiotic NPC's that they aren't even woke to the illogical line of their (un)reasoning.
We've all heard the argument for the Wall based on the national security needs of Israel. Whenever anti-wall critics(who happen to be disproportionately Jewish) decry Donald Trump's Wall Proposal as unrealistic, ineffectual, and/or immoral, the Pro-Wall advocates point to Israel and its powerfully effective walls. There is a factual and polemical aspect to naming Israel as Exhibit A in the usefulness(and indispensability) of Walls. First, it is true that Israel’s walls are among the most effective in the world and against not only Arabs but African migrant-invaders. So, anyone who says that walls don’t work is lying. The other reason is to shame Jewish anti-Wall opponents. It exposes their hypocrisy as the Tribe that insists on The Wall for the Jewish Nation-State but opposes it for any white-majority or Western nation. It’s an effective way to shame-face and silence Jews who are ardent Zionists and support extensive wall-building around Israel and Occupied Territories but nay-say walls for goy nations. How dare these Jews say walls are great for the Jewish Homeland but for no other people and nation? Also, both Political Parties in the US remind us over and over that Israel is wonderful and indeed the greatest ally of the US. Well, if Israel is so wonderful, whatever it does must be wonderful too, and these days, Israel is mainly known for its super-high and super-tough walls. So, if Israel is so great and its walls are so wonderful, maybe it makes good sense for other nations to also build walls for their own national security.
Now, we know why Jews are for Walls for Israel and No-Walls for goy nations. It’s the same reason why Jews are for Balls for Jews but No-Balls for white goyim. Jews want white goyim mentally castrated to serve the Jewish master. White Gelding is the main agenda of PC. And ever notice that Jews have contradictory positions on guns as well? Jews are all for guns in Israel, a nation that actually mandates gun-ownership for each and every Jewish family. But Jewish-Americans call for stringent gun-control and even gun-banning in the US. Why would Jews support universal gun-ownership in Israel but then push for gun-banning in the US? It’s because Israel is majority Jewish, and so, gun-ownership means a well-armed Jewish people. In contrast, Jews are only 2% of Americans, and that means Jews are out-gunned 50 to 1. Therefore, Jews want guns to be monopolized by the state that is controlled by Jews who have bought up most whore-politicians and appoint most judges. As with everything else, Jewish Logic all comes down to “Is it good for Jews?” Jews only feign ethics and morality in their argumentation, the main purpose of which is to ensure not only security but supremacy for the Jewish People. So, one should never listen to Jewish appeals to humanitarianism or what-must-be-done-for-the-children. They are all rhetorical smokescreen to push through an agenda that is really meant to consolidate Jewish Control and Power. Then, it becomes obvious why Jews are pro-guns in Israel. It means majority of Jews out-gunning Arabs. And it makes sense why Jews are anti-guns in the US. Gun ownership means goyim outgunning Jews. What goes for guns also goes for walls. Walls in Israel mean security for the Jewish state. Having extensive walls means Jews can keep out any people who are deemed hostile, burdensome, or troublesome. Thus, Jewish nationhood is secured, and hopefully, Israel can last forever as it favors a policy of Jewish-Immigration-Only while excluding non-Jews who might crash the Zionist Party. But, when it comes to walls in goy nations, Jews think differently. After all, the Wall during WWII came to symbolize Jews trapped in the Warsaw Ghetto, a precursor to the current situation in Gaza according to pro-Palestinian advocates. In Europe during WWII, Jews didn’t get to control the walls and decide who got in and who remained out. Walls meant the Nazis got to keep Jews trapped in the ghetto, from which there was virtually no escape and no entry(except by the Germans who were often murderous). (Jews often bitch about how nationalism and anti-open-borders policy are like Nazi Evil, but if anything, it was Nazi Germany that enforced Open Borders and it was non-German nationalism that was the best bet against Nazi aggression. Hitler wanted an Open Europe where Germans could move in and out of any nation at their whim. Indeed, Jews were safest in nations that still had effective national barriers against Nazi pan-Europeanism. It was following Germany's Open Invasion of Poland and France that Jews in those places really came under tremendous heat. And Germany’s Open Invasion policy against Russia promised doom for countless millions of Slavs and Jews. What saved the Jews was the nationalist push-back by the Russians and others who resisted the Nazi German Open Invasion policy. Given what Open Invasion policies have done to Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen in recent years, why would any sane person oppose national sovereignty and secure borders? It was precisely because Iraq and Libya were unable to prevent foreign invasions that they ended up in the mess that they are. And there would have been no Syrian War if the Syrian regime could have controlled its borders. But Saudis, Turks, Israel, the US, and myriad Jihadi groups all worked together to breach Syrian borders and tear that country apart. Jews are willfully telling lies when they conflate nationalism and borders with Nazism and inhumanity. In nearly every case, erosion of national borders led to more tensions, conflicts, wars, and even genocides. Nazi Germany was not content to mind its own borders and respect the borders of other nations. It was all about Open Borders Imperialism, and when one ponders its effect on a nation like Syria in recent years, one would have to be stupid, ignorant, or evil to push for the erosion of borders.) Jews also hate the idea of Walls for Goy Nations because such symbolizes autonomy, independence, and sovereignty against Jewish-dominated globalism. It means limits on the Jewish Globalist penetration and takeover of those nations. It’s like the Portnoic Jewish penis hates the idea of well-protected goy vaginas. The Jewish Pud wants to freely penetrate and conquer white pooters.
One might argue that Jews are over-reacting when it comes to demand for border security among goy populations. After all, when Hungarians prevent foreign migrant-invaders from barging in, they are not shutting their nation to foreign travel, investment, and business. They just don’t want their lovely nation inundated with law-breaking marauders who will surely cause lots of social problems(as well as change the character of the nation were they to remain indefinitely). So, why do Jews condemn Hungary? It’s because any show of national assertiveness signifies desire for national autonomy and independence. And that means a nation like Hungary belongs to Hungarians first and foremost. Non-Hungarians, goyim or Jewish, must respect this fact of Hungary. Now, almost all goyim are willing to respect Hungarian national rights, so why are Jews so hellbent on insisting that Hungary doesn’t belong to Hungarians and that Hungarian-ness must be ‘fluid’(like 50 genders) and ‘inclusive’, i.e. recently arrived Muslims and Africans should be welcomed as New Hungarians. It’s because Jews are the premier globalist-imperialists in the world, and their power derives mainly from worldwide networking. After all, even though Jews do have a nation of their own, the fact is Israel, in and of itself, hardly constitutes a great power. The real basis of Jewish Power is that the Tribe has penetrated and taken over GOY nations and uses complex networking to coordinate Jewish-First Agenda from NY to London to Paris to Tel Avis to Moscow to etc. This is why Jews regard ANY sign of goy defiance against the Jewish Globo-Agenda with alarm. After all, it is most unnatural and unjust for a tiny minority to wield such disproportionate power over nations where the overwhelming majority populations are composed of non-Jewish races and cultures. Granted, Jews are playing with fire when they push for radical globalism in goy nations because of the danger of populist backlash. After all, the ONLY thing Hungary wanted was border security from the Muslim and African ‘refugees’. It was willing to work with EU and US on most things. But Jews like George Soros pushed so hard against Hungary over the ‘Refugee’ Crisis that Hungary ramped up their nationalism to not only keep out the invaders but to boot the Soros foundation out of the country. Jews have gotten so arrogant and so used to having their ass kissed(even by America, the most powerful country in the world) that they now seem incapable of the smallest compromise. Their attitude is ‘our way or the highway’. Given that such chutzpah is bound to piss off any goy group, Jews go about promoting Diversity so that they can play divide-and-rule among the goyim. After all, no matter how rich and well-connected the Jewish minority may be, they are no match for a united majority goy population with guns and pitchforks. Once the goy majority break free of the programming and realize what Jews are really up to, they may rise up and really stick it to the Jews. Jews know this, and that is why they not only seek to deracinate every goy national identity(and spread decadence and degeneracy) but to diversify the population so that the various goyim will be at each other’s throats than go after Jews. Now, if Jews stopped acting crazy, none of this may be necessary. Most white goyim are willing to co-exist with Jews and respect much that is admirable about the Jewish community. But maybe there is something in the Jewish psyche that just can’t leave things alone. They just have to keep pushing for more and more. Ironically, Jews are rather like Adolf Hitler in this. Der Fuhrer just didn’t know when to stop with his insatiable ambition.
Now, let’s consider the Pro-Wall argument from the Palestinian viewpoint. We know why walls have been good for Israel. We know that walls have effectively ended terrorist bombings in Israel. We know walls make Jewish occupiers/settlers in West Bank feel much safer. Combination of walls, Zio-Apartheid restrictions, and IDF presence allows Jews to live relatively safe even in areas where they are outnumbered by (justifiably)angry Palestinians. And Pro-Wall advocates in the US love to rub the faces of Jewish Anti-Wall activists and politicians in the facts about Israel and the Wall. But what goes unspoken is that the Pro-Wall argument is just as, if not more, compelling when we bring Palestinians into the equation. For starters, how was Palestine wiped off the map from the river to the sea to make way for the new nation of Israel? It was because Palestinians had no effective walls to keep the Jewish-Zionist migrant-colonizer-invaders out. If Palestinians had walls like Jews have today in Israel, there would be no Israel. The place would still be Palestine inhabited mostly by native Arabs. The destruction of Palestine by endless Jewish migration and finally by the Nakba Pogroms of 1948 goes to show that walls or some form of tough border security is necessary for any nation to survive. Indeed, the creation of Israel proves not only the importance of walls but the danger of mass-migration. The wholesale ‘immigration’ of Jews to Palestine eventually led to ethnic cleansing. Same had happened to Serbians of Kosovo, now owned by Albanian Muslims who'd migrated into the region under Ottoman Imperial rule. Granted, Serbians could argue that they are like the Jews on the subject of Kosovo because they long for their ancient homeland just like Jews had longed to reclaim the Holy Land over the centuries, a dream finally fulfilled in 1948. But apparently, only Jews have the right to reclaim ancient homelands. Jews (re)taking Palestine was great but Serbians better forget about retaking Kosovo, especially as World Jewry are totally on the side of Albanian Muslims there.
The importance of the walls is demonstrable not only with the recounting of Nakba and destruction of defenseless Palestine but by what is going on in West Bank right now. While Jews in Israel have effective walls against Palestinians in West Bank, Palestinians in West Bank have no effective walls against Jews in Israel. That means Israel can defend itself from Palestinian infiltrators and terrorists, but West Bank cannot protect itself from Jewish colonists, invaders, and settlers. So, which side has the advantage? Jews with effective Walls against Palestinians OR Palestinians with No-Walls against Jews? If two swordsmen square off, who has the advantage? The one with sword and shield or the one with only sword, a wooden one at that compared to the steel sword of the opponent? Walls mean security and survival. The ONLY reason Constantinople lasted as long as it did was because of its massive walls. When they were finally breached, it was all over. Ideally, walls would not be necessary in a world governed by Rule of Law or Rule of Honor, where all peoples respect the borders of other nations in deference to laws or the honor system. And many people do have a sense of honor and obey rules. But then, many people don’t. In the 21st Century, two peoples are least mindful of laws and honor: Jewish globalists at the very top and the masses of Third Worlders who act like zombies in WWZ. Now, why would the uppermost elites work with the barbarian masses to destroy the Great White Middle? One reason is that both the elites and the barbarians have no respect for rules. Barbarians think and act like animals driven by primitive drives and appetites. So, if Third World masses can invade the West and feed on freebies, that’s just fine as far as they’re concerned. As for the uppermost elites, they regard rules as for the ‘little guys’. They themselves feel as gods who are beyond the ‘petty’ conventions of ‘right and wrong’. Barbarians think in terms of ‘below the law’, whereas the Rulers, as globo-deities, think in terms of ‘above the law’. But a more practical reason for the alliance of uppermost Jews and Third World hordes is because Jewish elites are convinced that the ONLY SURE WAY to secure Jewish supremacist domination in the West for all time is via Diversity. Only Diversity will lead to conditions where the goyim are so divided that they will never be able to unite to challenge Jewish Dominance.
Anyway, would you rather be Israelis with powerful walls against Palestinians in West Bank OR Palestinians with powerless No-Walls against Jews in Israel? Who are invading whom? Are Palestinians in West Bank invading and colonizing Israel OR are Jews in Israel(and around the world) invading and colonizing West Bank? Which side has the force of walls? The answer is, of course, obvious as day. But because Jews want to monopolize the power of walls for themselves, we are fed endless propaganda by the media(another power source monopolized by Jews) that walls are bad for goyim. Funny that whatever is good for Jews is bad for goyim. And whatever is bad for goyim is good for Jews. It’d be like Jews telling us that money is bad, but the moment we toss away our dough, they pick it up and pocket it. The fact that so many white goyim have been persuaded by Jews to see walls as a bad thing(despite the fact that Jews keep building more walls for Israel) is sad proof that a lot of whites are real dummies or idiots. Haven’t they figured it out that Jews are playing them like a fiddle and setting them against fellow white folks who happen to be patriotic or slowly shaking free from the hypnosis(or virulent hysteria) of PC? Isn’t it interesting that both ‘right-wing’ Jews and ‘left-wing’ Jews are agreed on the necessity of Israel’s walls, but the white population is divided between those who see the value of walls and those who think it’s an evil symbol of ‘xenophobia’?
But the fact that even relatively 'red-pilled' people like Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson argue in favor of the Wall by invoking only Israel goes to show that they have yet to fully awaken from what is really going on. They are still under the impression that Jews may accept them as partners(if not equals) even though Jews regard ‘fellow whites’, the dimwit goyim, as sheeple to mess with. Patriots go to great lengths to demonstrate that they like Jews and want to be like the Jews(especially the proud ones in Israel), but the fact is most Jews in the West look upon white goyim in the manner that Jews in Israel & West Bank look upon Palestinians: An inferior people to subjugate, humiliate, and castrate. White Patriots flatter themselves as akin to White Zionists when, if anything, their condition is more akin to that of White Palestinians. Indeed, every day, it seems more like what Jews are now doing to West Bank is merely a dress rehearsal for what they intend to do with all the West. If Jews have the numbers to take over West Bank for Greater Israel, they intend to use hordes of Third World masses as proxy-armies of Jews. Of course, these Third Worlders have no love for Jews, but they don’t have the brainpower to challenge Jewish power once they enter the West. Also, as the main conflict will be between whites and non-whites, Jews can play off both sides. It’s like Jews cajoled white Christian soldiers into invading and destroying the land of the ‘muzzies’ and then encouraged Muslim migration-invasion to the West to use them as dreamy-eyed immigrants against white ‘racist-supremacist xenophobes’. What people like Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson need to start doing is make a case for the Wall by invoking the history and plight of Palestinians. Palestinians lost their homeland in the Nakba Pogroms because they had no effective walls or border security against the Jews who were favored by the Great Powers like UK, US, and USSR. And Palestinians in West Bank are now losing what little remains of their homeland because they have no effective wall against Jews. In contrast, Jews have effective walls against Palestinians(and others), and that means Israel remains secure as the homeland for Jews. Walls mean power, security, and survival. No Walls means no power, no security, and extinction. It should be obvious by now that World Jewry work to deny the right of walls to white nations. Also, by promoting Afromania, Jungle Fever, Homomania, and Feminism, Jews also seek to rob white men of balls. No walls and balls for the white race if the Jewish Globalist Hegemonists can help it. Because American Jews regard whites not unlike how Israeli Jews regard Palestinians — and because the Jewish Plan for the white race is White Nakba on a massive scale — , it is about time white Americans came to identify more with Palestinians than with Jews. After all, with whom do white Americans(and Europeans) have more in common? Jews have the power of walls and balls in Israel. Palestinians have no power of walls and balls. Do white people in EU and US have walls and balls OR no walls and balls? They have no walls and balls. Well, which people did most(via their monopoly of key institutions and industries) to rob white people of walls and balls? Jews of course. Then, it is about time that white people began to feel, think, and act in terms of WE ARE ALL PALESTINIANS. Not White Zionists but White Palestinians. Just like it’d be great for Palestinians to have walls and balls, it’d be great for whites regain have walls and balls. Well, which people are denying both Palestinians and whites the advantages of walls and balls? It's the Jews. Whites keep thinking they are partners and allies of Jews when, if anything, Jews regard whites like they do Palestinians: Slaves, servants, serfs, peons, or cattle. After all, what do Palestinians in West Bank and Anglos in Texas have in common? Day by day, they continue to lose the demographic struggle against invasive populations. What Jewish colonizers do in West Bank, Mexicans and Central Americans do in Texas and Southwest territories. Now, do Jews side with Anglos OR with Mexicans & Central Americans? Isn’t it surreal that while Anglo-Texans root for Jewish colonizers in West Bank, Jews root for Mexican & Central American colonizers of Texas? Whites root for Jews against Arabs, but Jews root for browns against whites. Geez, no wonder whites are losing. Texas has anti-BDS laws that forbids government workers to stand against the Zionist Occupation of West Bank, but the great irony is that Jews are hellbent on doing to Anglo-Texans what they did to Palestinians.
Whites have become such worthless cucks. Among the elite whites, it’s just a case of craven greed as all they care is about more shekels from Jewish Power. Among white masses, too many are dimwit Evangelicals who worship Jews-as-the-Chosen or moronic gun-huggers whose worldview came from Hollywood-produced Chuck Norris movies where gung-ho Americans mow down a bunch of subhuman terrorist ‘muzzies’. They seem to have no idea that Jews have no more regard for them than they do for Palestinians.
According to Jewish Logic, White Christian Soldiers exist to be shipped off to the Middle East to fight Wars for Israel and kill tons of 'Muzzies'. These Jewish-instigated wars lead much havoc and Muslims moving to the West. Then, Jews hug Muslims as 'refugees' and 'immigrants' and use them to berate white Americans as 'xenophobes' and 'Islamophobes'.
Incidentally, the US-and-Mexico situation is the reverse of the one in Israel-and-West-Bank. In the case of Israel and West Bank, it is the bigger, richer, and more powerful party(Israel of course) that gets to defend itself while also invading the weaker territory. Palestinians in West Bank can’t intrude into Israel, but Jews in Israel sure can enter West Bank as they please and grab more territory. Tragic as it is for Palestinians, it seems natural because, historically speaking, the greater power gets to defend its domain while invading other domains. The basic law of imperialism.
But between the US and Mexico, things seem to go against the grain of historical norms. After all, the US is far bigger, richer, and more powerful than Mexico, but almost all the invasions are from south to north... and the US seems helpless to do anything about it. If anything, Mexico has a tougher and more effective border policy(except when it willfully wants to serve as conduit for the Caravandals between Central America and the US) than does the US where migration/immigration policy is all but broken. Donald Trump talks tough but has been unable to enforce any effective border policy as the courts are dominated by Jews or their globo-homo commissars.
Why is the bigger, richer, and stronger nation weaker in the equation? Why is the US like the West Bank vis-a-vis Mexico/Central America that act like Israel with their endless reserves of invader-settlers? In the past, it was the big tough US that not only defended itself from non-white foreigners but invaded and took SW territories from Mexico(as well as other parts of the world). Back then, the US was like Israel, and Mexican territories were like West Bank.
Today, US is still many times richer and more powerful than Mexico but weaker when it comes to border security. Why is the US like West Bank in its utter impotence to stop the invasion of migrant-settlers from the South? Well, we know why. The elite institutions of America are ruled by Jewish supremacist hegemonists and their globo-homo cuck-dogs. The real problem isn’t that the US is unable to stop the migration-invasion due to lack of manpower or materials but that it is hamstrung due to dictates from ABOVE. Big tough body of America is now animated by the Jewish head. Globalism says, "Jews can invade West Bank, and browns/blacks can invade US & EU, but whites in EU and US better just give up and take it up the ass like the helpless Palestinians in the West Bank."
In a strange way, Jews support massive non-white immigration-invasion as their own Pro-Wall policy. From the Judeo-Hegemonic Perspective, a huge mass of non-whites amounts to a Human Wall or River-like Barrier against White Power. Non-white masses are the demographic-electoral-economic moat around the globo-homo Jewish Supremacist castle to keep out the white populist-nationalists with pitchforks. In war, flooding is sometimes used to hold back the enemy. Dams are blown-up to let the water flow between your side and the approaching enemy. Jewish elites regard the non-white demographic flooding of the West as akin to the crashing waves that engulfed Pharaoh's cavalry and spared the Hebrews from Egyptian wrath.
