Two main ways by which our side has continued to stumble are:
1. Blaming the 'left' for problems since the End of the Cold War.
2. Using 'racist' as epithet.
Globo-Homo is 'leftist' only in label. In fact, it is the proxy of ultra-right Jewish Tribal Supremacism. The current 'left', totally dominated by Jews, is not True Leftism. It's really just a peekaboo game of ever-changing 'leftist' tropes to serve what are ultimately the ultra-right agenda of Jewish Supremacists.
Indeed, the current struggle is not about Right vs Left but Right vs Right, except that the Jewish Ultra-Right hides behind 'leftist' and 'progressive' labels to lend its agenda a 'universalist' sheen of 'liberal democracy', 'human rights', and 'equal justice'. But really, just ask the Palestinians and those who support BDS, aka justice for Palestinians.
In truth, there is no real difference between the likes of Trevor Lynch and the Jewish Power. Both are motivated by ultra-rightism and tribal supremacism. Lynch has Nazi sympathies(even while being critical of aspects of Nazism), whereas Jews are hellbent on world domination and tribal supremacy. If 'white nationalists' are less despicable, it's because they are honest in their tribalism whereas Jewish supremacists put on 'progressive' masks. That said, the Jewish Right is far more forthright in Israel where Jews make up a solid majority. There, Jews feel secure in their power & numbers and openly yammer about how they're #1. They even have openly ultra-nationalist politicians in government. But as Jews are a minority in Goy Nations, they know it'd be foolish to candidly air their core ultra-rightist convictions. So, they masquerade as 'liberals' and even 'leftists'. But it's all a fraud because the very Jews who shriek about 'white supremacism' do everything to suppress BDS and to pressure every goy politician into supporting Zionist-centrist US foreign policy that turns a blind eye to the plight of Palestinians and other victims of Jews. And the very Jews who call just about any white conservative a 'nazi' in the US will readily work with quasi-nazi elements in Ukraine. It call comes down to the tribal question of "Is it good for Jews?" And these supposedly compassionate Jewish Liberals who stand for modernity will support the most retrograde extreme Islamic terrorists against secular modernizers like Assad of Syria. Jews use 'leftism' much like the US used Red China against the USSR. Nixon met with Mao not to approve of the Chairman's ideology but to use China as leverage against the Soviet Union(even though Soviet Communism was, at the time, moderate compared to the virulent Maoist kind).
By characterizing this ultra-right Jewish Supremacism as 'leftist', our side is actually doing our enemies a favor. The last thing Jewish Supremacists want is to be is outed and exposed as ultra-rightist tribalists, which is what they really are. Jews may support homos coming out of the closet but remain very much in the closet as Jewish Supremacists. The face they show is that of 'Jewish Liberals' and 'Jewish Progressives'. But, it has always been tribalism-uber-alles with Jews. Why were Jews worried about Joe McCarthy? Too many suspected of radicalism were Jews. The very Jews who bitched about the Red Scare and the blacklist had NO problems with the much bigger blacklisting of pro-German individuals in Hollywood and culture; and of course, Jews didn't lift a finger for Japanese-Americans who were dispossessed and 'interned'.
Jews love being called 'leftist'. It gives cover to their ultra-tribal-rightism. It fools so many into believing that the great struggle is between reactionary rightists vs progressive leftists. Furthermore, super-capitalists — the top 1% is now richer than the entire middle class — also love being tagged as the Left because the last thing they want is for us to notice how super-privileged they are(and getting even super-richer). In the current retarded discourse, we have the middle class(and working class) being reduced to penury but attacking their super-rich neo-aristocratic overlords as 'leftists', or even as 'socialists' and 'communists'. The super-rich are cracking up at this. It's like some sadist beating someone with a stick but being accused of being a 'pacifist'. Billionaires like Bill Gates, Sergei Brin, Michael Bloomberg, and George Soros are 'leftists', ROTFL.
The True Left is hardly alive. No one in any position of power believes in universal justice or equal rights anymore because idolatry has replaced ideology. In a truly leftist system, people would be equally outraged by victimization at the hands of black thuggery as of white violence. But the idolatry favors black tribal supremacism. Blacks can do no wrong. Long ago, the Civil Rights Movement did run on leftist values: equality for whites and blacks under the law. But that was then, this is now. Today, blacks are deemed right simply because they're black. After the most thoroughgoing investigation of the Michael Brown case, it became obvious the white cop acted in self-defense against loathsome Brown. But to many people, Brown is still a saint while the white guy will never work as a policeman again; and no one pleads his case. This isn't leftism but tribal supremacism in favor of blacks. It is ultra-rightist, just the flipside of white supremacism. Of course, because of past history of racial discrimination and the Civil Rights Movement narrative, blacks still manage to disguise their tribal supremacist agenda with rhetoric about 'equal justice', but blacks, like Jews, are for idolatrous supremacy. They believe themselves to be the new thug-version of aristocrats: above the law.
You have to give the Left credit. They never take a day off.
Such hasn't been the history of radical leftism. After the initial stages of violent campaigns and purges, the leftist system turned into rigidity and dogmatism. By the time Stalin consolidated power, leftism became a matter of the same old same old. Soviet Union was a mummy state under Brezhnev. It was like a broken record playing the same tune over and over. Socialism became static and resistant to change.
Restlessness is the product of capitalism, and what is called 'leftism' in the West reflects the fashion-obsession of consumerism. Just like popular culture pursues one fashion craze after another, Western consumer pop-politics is mostly about the latest fad, the hot thing. 'Pussy Hats' today, 'Migrant Kids in Cages' tomorrow, 'Saint George Floyd' the day after, etc. No wonder Big Capital is so in cahoots with this kind of bogus 'leftism'. I think Jean-Luc Godard called it 'Marx and Coca-Cola'. Antonio Gramsci and Calvin Klein.
It's not about class warfare against the global-capitalist oligarchs but about new vanity hysterics, mainly of homos and blacks, both in the pockets of Jews who control most institutions and industries. Even the so-called 'communist' Antifa got most of their ideas from pop culture: punk music and grunge. And they emulate pop icons and rappers. And by their very nature, homos tend toward narcissism, nihilism, aristocratism, and preening snobbery. No wonder Big Capital loves homos. No wonder just about every 'leftist' agenda or movement is branded with globo-homo symbols at the behest of the Big Jew who provides the funds for these movements. Just like all foods must be kosherized, all of politics must be homosherized. And, it's hardly surprising the Deep State is welcoming of homos because they've proven to be the most ruthless, cunning, nihilistic, and cold-blooded bunch of killers for the System. Homos cater to power, and they've been among the most loyal servants of Jewish Hegemonism that recruits and favors homos all over the world to serve Jewish Supremacism against national autonomy.
Once they have finished destroying us in effigy, the next logical step is destroying us in person, i.e., open genocide against whites, rather than the stealth genocide they instituted in the 1960s with multiculturalism and race-replacement immigration.
Not going to happen. If whites were gone from the face of the earth, Jewish Power would vanish also. Jews use 'leftism' against whites to make whites serve Jews. Sure, Jewish Power wouldn't mind killing millions if it had to, but it would be to teach a lesson, not to wipe whites out. Jewish Bolsheviks were ruthless and worked with Stalin to kill millions, but it wasn't to wipe out the Slavs but to teach them who's boss. It's like what Jews have done in the Middle East(with white goy support). Jews have waged Wars for Zion that have led to the destruction of millions of Arab/Muslim lives in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and etc. Jews are capable of mass murder, but their plan is not to wipe out the white race but to subjugate it.
But Leftists don’t just tear down idols. They are also both shameless and tireless in molding new idols from human excrement. George Floyd is just the latest and most ludicrous in a long line of fake heroes, saints, and martyrs: Lenin, Stalin, Martin Luther King . . .
This is absurd. Why would anyone compare George Floyd to Lenin or Stalin, or even MLK? Lenin was a highly intelligent revolutionary who devoted his life to the cause. Stalin was a tireless worker and transformed Russia into an industrial and military powerhouse. One could argue Lenin was evil and Stalin more so, but they were not molded from excrement. They were extraordinary human beings who changed history.
In contrast, George Floyd is a total joke because he did nothing in life. He was just some street scum turned into a saint by the Jewish-run media. He's even lower than Horst Wessel. Lenin and Stalin were genuine historical giants. They weren't nobodies molded into somebodies. Even MLK, for all his gross failings, had vision and skill as a movement leader and world shaker. It's like, however one may loathe Mussolini and Hitler, they were remarkable men of immense power and vision.
Jewish gay rights advocate Harvey Milk (1930–1978) is one such figure.
No, the Milk Cult has nothing to do with Lenin or Stalin. Or even MLK. As much as I loathe MLK and dislike blacks, they had a compelling case during the Civil Rights Era. In contrast, Harvey Milk was a second-rate scuzzo turned into a big deal by the Jewish-supremacist gangster state of mass advertisement, a total clown world. Whatever one thinks of Lenin or Stalin, one cannot overestimate their place in history. Milk, in contrast, would be nothing without the hype. His cult is a demonstration of the power of advertising and celebrity culture. The Milk Cult is really an expression of ultra-right Jewish Supremacism. Jews push globo-homo to recruit 'rainbow'-collaborators all over the world to work against their own nations/cultures. In addition, Jews favor homos-uber-alles because it's a case of minority-elite-supremacism, one that complements Jewish minority hegemony over goyim. Also, homos came to prominence under hyper-capitalism that encourages vanity, narcissism, privilege, greed, and neo-hierarchy. As homos are disproportionately energetic, ruthless, devious, and cunning in their ambition, even rich Republicans have become dependent on homo aids and agents.
Finally, this wholesale attack on the Left is self-defeating. The whole point of fascism is to combine the Right and the Left. Mussolini began on the Left and moved to the Right but never became a reactionary seeking to turn back the clock. Adolf Hitler was the head of Nationalism + Socialism. Instead of falling for the fatal dichotomy of Right vs Left, the new way forward must be neo-fascist in fusing the good of the left with the good of the right as neither side offers all the answers or holds all the secrets to History.
And let's remember that it's the Jews than the Left who are tireless. It could be Democratic Jews or Neocon Jews. It could be Jews who pretend to be 'liberal' like Jerry Nadler or Chuck Schumer. Or it could be the openly ultra-rightist Netanyahu, a very tireless Jew. Notice Jewish 'conservatives' are more tireless than white goy liberals, and Jewish 'liberals' are more tireless than white goy conservatives. It's an ethnic thing. It's like homos are generally more energized than straight people. And blacks are louder and more aggressive than non-blacks. Genetics. Alan Dershowitz has drifted from liberalism to conservatism but is the same tireless Jew. Many Neocons were Jews who went from Left to Right, but they never lost their energy and soon enough took over the GOP, purged all 'Arabists', and steered US foreign policy toward serving Wars for Israel and Jewish hegemonism.
Now, there are some genuine leftists in the West, but they don't have much power. They tend to support BDS but get nowhere. They are as hopeless as MAGA people. Tulsi Gabbard had the most leftist anti-imperialist foreign policy among the Democratic candidates, but she was soon booted out by the power(and regular 'progressives' mostly ignored her).
One thing for sure, most goy 'leftists' today are completely without agency. For them, what counts as 'justice' or 'sacred' must be handed to them from above by the Jews. Take the 'gender pronoun' thing. Goy 'leftists' couldn't have cooked up such nonsense on their own. They became obsessed with it because Jews concocted and hyped the nuttery via media and academia(and statist institutions).
This points to a deeper problem among goyim. They lack the autonomous power of prophecy and vision. They want to feel passionate about something but lack the inner fuel to start their own fires. So, they rely on others to supply the heat. Consider the spread of Christianity in Europe. All those white folks failed to create their own lasting god(s) and came to rely on a Jewish source.
If whites are to be free of Jewish Supremacism, they must learn to ignite a prophetic fire within their own hearts. Today, as even Christianity has run its course and gone cold, so many Christians turn to the new gods of globo-homo and BLM. Look at the churches with BLM and globo-homo symbols. Why? Because having lost the messianic and missionary zeal of the Faith, white Christians are drawn to the warmth of the new fire(or flashing lights): Holy Homo and Noble Negro.
Comedy offers a glimpse into the Jewish Way. No entertainment format requires as much nonstop energy as comedy does. Sitcoms must produce laugh-a-minute. Stand-up comic must always keep the audience laughing(just like salesmen must 'always be closing' in GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS or do something else). In the long run, leftism was too earnest and humorless(and even relatively witless) for Jewish Energy that needs constant outlet. No wonder then that real Jewish Global Supremacy came not by the way of communism but capitalism. Whereas communism is highly charged in its early radical phase, once the system is in place it's all dogma and stability, like a religious theocracy. In contrast, capitalism is always about rolling the dice, the constant process of creative destruction. In the end, Jewish Energy is more Marx Brothers than Karl Marx. And as long as Jews control 'leftism', it can't be about equality because who in his right mind believes Jews want to be equal with goyim? Just ask the Palestinians.
In the long run, all struggles are about Right vs Right than Right vs Left. While leftist ideology can burn like wild fire and transform the world, eventually ideology gives way to identity. Ideology is about what's in the mind. It's like air and lacks grounding. In the end, ideas must serve something, which is why Russian Communism, Chinese Communism, Yugoslavian Communism, Vietnamese Communism, and Cuban Communism all turned nationalist. When tensions flared up between Russia and China, it was really about identity/territory despite the ideological rhetoric about the other side being 'bourgeois'.
Likewise, while many Jews did indeed become genuine leftists in the late 19th century and first half of the 20th century, their ideals eventually burned out or attached to identity: Many early Zionists combined nationalism with socialism, even with communism. They were even willing to work with their ideological enemies, Jewish capitalists, because they shared commonality in identity. And when communist China punitively struck communist Vietnam in the late 70s, it was partly to avenge the persecution of Chinese capitalists in Vietnam. Identity over ideology. So, the larger arc of history is really about Right vs Right. And that is precisely the true nature of the conflict today. It's about Jewish ultra-right(in 'leftist' or 'liberal' clothing) vs the rightisms(or identity-centered politics) of goyim, such as Palestinians, Syrians, Russians, Hungarians, Poles, and now, even China, as Jews figure Yellow Peril is useful in distracting Americans from the truth of Jewish Supremacist Rule over America.
It is about a ‘Great Reset’ vs. longing for greatness
It is about Jerusalem vs. Athens
It is really about the ‘last days of the Weimar Republic’ all over again.
Throughout its history, capitalism has been using different tactics to suppress opposition.
It's really about Jews vs the World. Granted, not all Jews are neo-satanist and crazy. Not all are powerful. There have been righteous Jews who tried to speak the truth or some portion of it. Stephen Cohen, Norman Finkelstein, Brother Nathanael, and etc. But they don't have the power. Finkelstein couldn't even keep his gig at the second-rate university DePaul because of JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power spearheaded by the odious Alan Dershowitz.
Now, there would be problems in the world without Jews. Even if all Jews vanished into the thin air, there would be conflicts everywhere. Consider the recent conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. There are drug wars in Mexico. There are tensions between China and Vietnam. India and Pakistan hate one another. Still, Jewish Power makes it far worse by interfering in hot spots in the world. Instead of letting the locals come to terms a regional power playing broker, Jewish Power often intervenes by using its control of the US as the lone superpower. Would Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Iraq, and Afghanistan be in the states they are in if not for Jewish Power? Would there be a 'new cold war' with Russia?
Without Jewish interference, there would have been no coup in Ukraine and all the bloodbath that followed. Syria would be in one piece. Now, Assad is hardly an ideal leader, but what sane person would prefer Al-qaeda or ISIS? It seems Jews prefer ANYONE(even quasi-nazis in Ukraine) if it's GOOD FOR JEWS. That's about the extent of Jewish moral consciousness.
Just about ANY nation has internal divisions. They could be ethnic, religious, ideological, or whatever. There are some aggrieved factions or minorities in any society. Usually, they just go along because doing so is the best bet. It keeps the peace. But when the order becomes destabilized and these groups are supplied with arms & materials, a war can break out. Same is true of Israel. Suppose foreign powers undermined government power there and supplied arms to Palestinians in both Israel proper and West Bank. Things would go up in flames in street-to-street fighting, like in Syria. Such a Yinon-ist divide-and-rule strategy has been concocted by Jews for goy nations. So, Syria is on fire and Yemen too. Why? Jews don't want those nations to be stable, secure, and close to Iran. So, ANYTHING is justified in undermining them. So, a limited conflict within Syria blew up into a major war. Thanks Jews.
But then, a low-level Yinonist Plan has been devised for the West as well. Why do Jews push for mass-immigration and Diversity on goy nations(while never for Israel)? Because Jews know that more Goy Diversity means they can play divide-and-rule game more effectively. But even in relatively homogeneous nations, Jews create and play on ideological and idolatrous divisions to tear them apart. Take Poland. Jews are masters of psychology and understand the Polish Mentality. Poles suffer from the Polish Disease of Slavic Inferiority Complex. Poles don't want to be associated with Oriental Despotic Russians who seem so crude and backward. They want to be considered as part of Western Europe. They never tire of bleating on about how they are CATHOLIC than Orthodox and how they use the Latin Alphabet than Cyrillic. Poles were once powerful but came to ruins and weakness. They got swallowed up by Russia and came to idolize the West. So, they are a bunch of suckass dogs who crave approval from the West. Jews studied the 'Dumb Polack' psychology and know what to do, which is why so many young Poles are into globo-homo and Afromania. (As Catholicism has been replaced by Gay Rites and Jungle Fever in the West, young Poles are dropping Catholicism and raising the new banner of BLM with 'rainbow' colors. They go with whatever is 'cool' in the West.) Their modus operandi is essentially 'West is cool and awesome, and Polish value depends on how much the West approves of us.' Now, this wouldn't have been so bad in the past when, indeed, the West was far more advanced than the East. Western Enlightenment over Russian Oriental Despotism. Also, there was a time when the West was more race-ist than the East. Russia, with its polygot empire, became somewhat mongrelized. In contrast, Western Europeans, especially of Central and Northern Europe, were more homogeneously white and proud to it.
But what is the current West? It's about total cuckdom to Jews, Negroes, and Homos. It's about Erasism, or erasure of the native population. It's about the Great Replacement or White Nakba. If anything, current Russia is whiter than many parts of Germany, France, Sweden, Holland, and UK(which should stand for United Kolony than United Kingdom). But the Polish Disease is blind to all that. It only cares about seeking approval from the West that still hogs the global prestige. Due to the Polish Disease, Poles have no autonomous or independent way of gauging meaning and worth. All that matters is sucking up to the Prestigious West.
One may wonder why the West has prestige when its popular culture is garbage, its borders are broken, its elites are cucky-useless, and its cultural expression is 'twerking'? One reason is the power of hype. West controls the media machine and advertising. It creates the glitter in your eyes. But it's also because the nationalist, Christian, and/or conservative forces are so dull, boring, or corrupt. It's great to be nationalist and it's good to be Christian but one doesn't live on seriousness, morality, or eternity alone. People need sensory stimulation, especially in our modern era of electronica. It's like people love the celebration of Christmas more than its true meaning. It's the celebration of it that spread to Japan as well, a nation where only 1% is Christian. Consider the Beach Boys song, "Fun, Fun, Fun". Too often, people feel that the Right takes the T-Bird away. Of course, the Left took it away too under communism, which is why capitalism won the 'culture war' against communism. Capitalism offered rides on the T-Bird. Especially as Pop Culture prizes youth uber alles, shallowness has come to dominate social attitudes. And too often(and understandably), 'growing up' is seen as synonymous with losing one's idealism and coming to terms with the corrupt ways of the world. Too many 'grown-ups' are compromised professionals. Consider all those 'experts' in government. Would it be possible to create a culture where to be grown-up means to be more truthful and principled? To be wise than to compromise?
But it isn't easy to root out corruption since anyone who tries will have to go up against the whole system that put him into place. It's far worse when society is corrupt in general. Then, even as people gripe about corruption, they resist efforts to reform society because they themselves are so used to benefiting from it, which are the cases in Southern Italy and Greece. Southern Italians and Greeks complain endlessly about corruption but resist all attempts to end as it's how most of them do business. It's like blacks complain about crime and violence but resist attempts to root them out as they don't like white police sticking its nose into black affairs.
Poland is also very corrupt from top to bottom. Perhaps, Poles associate corruption with the Eastern Way and look to the West for a cleaner model. But while the workings of the bureaucracy may be cleaner(at least in Northern European nations), the West is also deeply corrupt and compromised at the very top because it lacks national autonomy. EU nations are all vassals of the US that is controlled by Jews. You can't have a sound national policy when your leaders are essentially led by the nose by the likes of George Soros. The fact that cleaner government is no panacea to current problems can be seen in UK, Germany, and Sweden. They have cleaner governments than Italy, Greece, and Poland, but that didn't stop them from embarking on national suicide. If anything, perhaps cleaner government paved the way for the demise. Clean government means law and order, and law and order can lead to prosperity. Order and Wealth leads to boredom and neurosis(like with the characters in Ingmar Bergman films). Also, prosperity means a more generous and naive outlook about the world, such as 'Save Africa'. Also, extended peace robs people of the warrior spirit that can sense danger. (Of course, Jewish-guided PC informs white people that their survival instincts are 'atavistic', 'backward', 'extreme', and 'far right' even as Jews stress upon survival instinct in Israel. According to Jews, any white will to survive as an identity is a 'pathology'.) Boredom, naivete, and good-will have spelled doom for Sweden. One silver lining about less clean orders is people tend to be less trusting and more survival-minded than good-will-minded. Now, a trust-culture is better than a distrust-culture but ONLY IF the elites are worthy of trust. If the elites are worthless cucks whose agenda will lead to national demise, a trust-culture is the worst possible thing for that society. The people will trust the elites and go over the cliff like so many lemmings.
Anyway, it's about Jewish Power that is messing up so much of the world, not least because Jewish intervention blows up local conflicts into global ones. Syrian War would have ended quickly with Assad victorious IF it weren't for the fact that Jewish-controlled US encouraged Turkey, Saudis, Israel and others to descend on that nation like a pack of vultures. Thus, it turned into a major conflagration.
While US-Iran relations would be sour due to what happened in 1979, it would be a lot better if not for the Jewish Lobby that insists on Israel remaining the ONLY Middle East nation with nukes. How surreal that Israel with hundreds of nukes gets billions in 'aid' while Iran, a nation with no nukes, gets sanctioned savagely. And what's the beef between US and Russia? Sure, many Americans hate Russia, but why? They rely on the Jewish-controlled Media that say Putin is 'Putler' and etc., or Russia is evil because it won't have homo parades. It's like dogs barking at something because the master ordered them to. If not for Jewish Power, most Americans would feel no hostility toward Russia. They might not agree with the Russian Way, but no one would get worked up for another 'cold war'. Anti-Russian policy is totally about Jewish sour-grapes because Putin didn't allow Jewish oligarchs to do as they pleased. Also, the notion of a white majority nation being proud of its identity/heritage and its religion and saying NO to the NWO(or JWO) is threatening to Jews because it might spread to other white majority nations: No More Sorrows with Soros. Jews pretend that they oppose Russia because it's against 'liberal democracy', but these same Jews have destroyed free speech in the West. They use Antifa terror and thuggery to shut people down. According to Jews, 'democracy' is whenever their puppets win. If the people freely elect someone Jews dislike, it's 'autocracy'. Jews would have us believe Ukraine is about 'liberal democracy' because Jews and their puppets run it.
Jewish Perfidy goes all around the world. Why does Jewish Power make things so difficult for negotiations with North Korea? Because North Korea has nukes and sets an example for nations hated by Israel. (Never mind N. Korea rushed to get them because Neocon Jews urged Bush II to include that nation in the 'Axis of Evil'.) Also, why would Jews tolerate a possible reunification of the peninsula and withdrawal of US forces when South Korea is such a useful puppet in the global chess game?
This Jewish craziness extends all over Latin America. Jewish-run US policy toward Latin America is as follows: Any nation that exhibits any sign of defiance and independently negotiates with Russia, Iran, or etc. must be targeted for regime-change. So, Bolivia came under crossfire. Venezuela has been targeted. All this talk of Venezuela interfering in US elections is rich coming from Americans who've been interfering in Latin American affairs forever. But as the Jew Taboo dictates that you can never mention the Jews, you got to blame something other than Jewish Power. If a Jew kicked Alex Jones in the butt, he would blame the Arabs or the 'Chicoms'.
While Jews aren't the sole reason for the world's problems, they often make things worse by using their proxies, all in the name of 'good for Jews'. Whether it's George Soros breaking the Bank of England or Paul Singer financially leeching off other nations, there is the Jewish Hand. And who spread all this hideous neo-satanic globo-homo madness? Jews did. And why did so many whites become completely defenseless against such rot? Because their minds have been molded by the 2 PC's of political-correctness and pop-culture controlled by Jews. And of course, proxies of Jews spread degeneracy(especially of globo-homo nature) and conflicts all over the world.
Karl Marx failed, but a kind of Marxism did come to fruition. That of Groucho, Chico, and Harpo. Look all around and world politics is like DUCK SOUP(or Cuck Soup). Wily Jews pull all sorts of tricks and lead the stiff/square white goyim by the nose. The build-up to the Iraq War was like the scene in DUCK SOUP. Jews run circles around goy politicians like Groucho and Chico do with Wasps. Jewish Power is always several moves ahead, and the goyim are often taken by surprise and succumb in bemusement. Of course, as we're supposed to take it so seriously, current world affairs is like a straight-faced comedy, but what a joke it is. In an earlier time, one might have regarded DUCK SOUP as a satire of warmongers, but it no longer seems that way. It's more like a funny manual of how Jews can manipulate thick-skulled, square, lame, or dimwit goyim into just about anything. How is the scene in DUCK SOUP any different from what happens in Congress, CIA, or the Pentagon?
Another revealing figure about the Jewish Way is Jerry(or Jewry) Springer. What was his shtick? He would bring on these disgruntled goyim and make them beat one another up to the audience chant of 'Jerry, Jerry, Jerry'. Naturally, people have gripes all across America, but Springer exploited it and blew up these squabbles into 'national' feuds, a kind of World War Trash. He exploited trivial matters and turned them into big comedy-drama for national TV. And while these hapless and stupid goyim made total fools out of themselves(while also delighting in their 15 min of fame as insta-celebrities), Springer stood apart, safe and aloof, giggling with contempt at the easily duped goyim.
How is this any different from how Jews play world politics? True, there are deep-seated tensions and problems all around the world. But they are local in nature and remain limited in their implications AS LONG AS some global power doesn't come between them. The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict wouldn't have gotten this bad IF Soros didn't encourage Armenia to make dumb decisions and if Israel didn't supply Azerbaijan with weapons. Notice how Jews play both sides, just like Jerry Springer pretended to have a sympathetic ear for all his guests when, in fact, he was doing everything to goad them into violence. On the show, there was Jerry Springer as the grandmaster, a kind of Soros-ian figure. And the big beefy security guys were like the US military. They kept the order. But did they keep the order for order's sake? No, the order was kept on stage just to make the guests fight like demented gladiators and make total fools of themselves. And what happens to these hapless goyim? Just ask the Armenians... or will anyone learn? Jews mess with the world, but the world pleads with Jews for sympathy as the Tribe has ungodly powers of finance, media, academia, big tech, gambling, deep state, and Shoah Worship(which deems any criticism of Jews as 'antisemitic' and 'nazi'). So, even people like Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump who've come under special abuse by Jews (must) go through the ritual of appealing to Jews for 'advice' and 'approval'. It's like a mafia extortion scheme where one must pay 'protection money' and show respect. But protection from whom? From the one providing the 'protection', as if you don't pay, your place will go up in flames.
In this new ‘Left’ Identitarian amalgam, every ‘as a’ voice is welcome except the White one.
It's been said Diversity Craze and PC(or 'wokeness') are about Anti-White-ism and celebration of all non-whites, but this isn't really true. If it were truly anti-white across the board, it would gain little traction with most whites. Why then do so many whites embrace it? Because it's white-elitist and appeals to the suppressed 'spiritual' side of man. A white person who adopts PC feels morally elitist over incorrigibly 'racist' whites and socially elitist because most higher institutions are governed by PC codes. Furthermore, man is naturally spiritual even if irreligious. Just like vegans crave meat — mind can be moral but the body isn't — , modern secular folks, despite their conceit of rationality, crave the sacred and spiritual because emotional balance demands it. Of course, if one needs spirituality, it's better to go with real religion or mythology, just like it's better to have meat-protein than the soy kind.
Religion says God is above all. Now, why is this a problem for Jews? Because if Christianity or Islam is true and if God is above all, then it means all races should bow down before God as the ultimate judge. Under God, Jews and Goyim would equally be judged. Jewish Supremacists don't want equality with goyim, and so, they pushed for secularization. Now, the secular order can also be for justice for all. If the Law calls for equal justice regardless of race, color, or creed, that means Jews must be treated and judged like anyone else. But, that's no good for Jewish Supremacist ambition. So, Jews, the masters of psychology, infused the modern secular mind that hungers for spirituality with the quasi-spiritual worship of Jews and their favorite allies.
So, Diversity isn't about equal celebration of all non-white groups but special celebration and apotheosis of Jews, along with blacks and homos. If PC or 'wokeness' were truly about equal justice for Diversity, then the media would run as many pro-Palestinian and pro-Syrian stories as pro-Jewish stories. Hollywood would have made many TV shows and movies about Nakba and the dark side of Zionism. But, while the media almost never run anti-Zionist stories, they are filled with anti-Syrian, anti-Iranian, and anti-anything-hated-by-Jews stories. When Michael Brown strong-armed an immigrant business owner whose store was later ransacked by black thugs, where was the concern for his kind? None. Blacks matter, they don't. If Diversity is about celebration of all sexual expressions and deviancy, how come there is no month-long celebration of incest? It's telling that most non-whites don't stand up for their own identities and cultures but seek attachment to one of the sacred identities, namely Jewish, black, and homo. How many non-whites would succeed in Wall Street, Hollywood, or Big Tech if they displayed the Palestinian Flag? A Burmese-American showing pride in Burmese identity doesn't get him very far. An Iranian-American extolling the greatness of Iran wins almost no wokemon points. For approval or success, they are better off waving the homo flag or displaying a BLM sign. In contrast, it's great for a Jew to say he's proud to be Jewish. It's sensational for a homo to say sodomy is 'pride'. It's awesome for blacks to pontificate about how 'black lives matter' even though blacks are main killers of blacks. So, Diversity is less about the celebration of non-white identities but about most non-white groups circling around the altars of Jewish Identity, Black Identity, and Globo-Homo, the Tri-Supremacism.
Now, what do whites get from this? While many whites do lose out, it offers quasi-spiritual succor to elite whites and wanna-be-elite whites who, lacking privilege, settle for the next-best thing, which is attitude(of virtue-signaling), as in "I work at Starbucks and live in a crammed apartment, but I listen to NPR and read the New Yorker like all the sOpHiStIcAtEd people". Oh wow, we are so impressed.
PC is designed so that not all whites lose out. While it beats many whites with the stick as 'racist', it offers 'spiritual' and careerist carrots to those who repent and seek redemption. This atonement can be sincere(among the naive & childlike) or cynical(among the craven & opportunistic), but what matters is it either bestows immediate status or justifies the existing privileges of those whites who've chosen to be 'baptized'. In a way, 'wokeness' is more exciting for whites than for non-whites. Whereas Jews, blacks, and homos can only feel righteous rage, whites can experience the full drama, the passion play, of sainthood. Or the Road-to-Damascus Moment, though it's more like 'dumbass-cuss'. Just like it's refreshing to take a shower when one's dirty and sweaty, it feels great to be washed of 'sin', which among secular whites is 'racism', 'antisemitism', and 'homophobia'. Evangelicals are about being Born-Again, and white secularists are essentially Evanglobalists. They feel born-again, hallelujah.
Furthermore, the notion of 'white privilege' has a perversely empowering effect on whites. After all, if 'white supremacism' is built into the System, then it means whites are indeed superior in power, wealth, and everything. That means whites have two options. Be greedy and keep all the goodies for themselves OR share the bounty with the less fortunate and show off their magnanimity. So, privileged whites who buy into 'white guilt' regard themselves as the all-powerful group that is being so kind and generous than a declining racial group being bullied and intimidated into acquiescence(even though the latter may be closer to the mark).
Besides, 'wokeness' really aids and abets white privilege. How? If White Power(meaning the shared and united power of all whites) is taboo and must be stamped out, then there can only be privilege for white individuals. The notion of 'privilege' NEVER applies to all members of a group. In Old Europe, the privileged were the noblemen, not all white people. So, if white people cannot consolidate power as a group or collective, then the only option is for white individuals to seek privilege for themselves and children.
When PC speaks of 'white privilege', it's as if ALL whites share in it. But, privilege is inherently exclusive. For example, the white advantage over blacks in Old America was the result of white power. Whites were united then and identified with one another, top to bottom, east to west. Power cuts through privilege, i.e. poor whites without privilege shared in the power of whiteness. Power exists without privilege.
If power is forbidden, there is only privilege for those who seek it on their own. So, for whites who don't want the burden of uniting with all whites and leading them as a united folks(as Moses did with the Israelites), PC is just fine because it allows them to work only for their own privilege than for the power of the whole race. After all, privilege is a less daunting task than power. It would have been easier for Moses to keep his privilege in Egypt and live well than give that up to strive for the power of his people as a collective unity.
Besides, as 'born-again good whites', these white cucky-wucks are allowed to feel oh-so-righteous and holy-schmoly, and this is in more ways than one a continuation of Christian Psychology. Elevate oneself by humbling oneself. "Oh, I'm a sinner, I admit it, and I said my 'Hail Marys', and that means I'm so much better than those who haven't, let alone the benighted who aren't even of the faith." Humbly bowing before God and Jesus means your kind is holy and has the right to conquer the heathens and destroy the heretics. It's the Christian Paradox: The lower you kneel, higher you feel. Same with today's cucky-wuck worshipers of Anne Frank, Barbra Streisand, MLK, Mandela, George Floyd, and Harvey Milk. And this mentality now infects the so-called 'right' as well as the 'left'. Look, Trump has the endorsement of magical rapper Kanye!
Covid-19 Crisis has exposed what the World Power Game is really about. It's a contest among cucks to win the approval of the Jews. In this, Iran is the only true exception. Even China and Russia are in the Cuck-Victory or Cuctory camp. They are trying to win the game of "Jews Favor Us Most".
Anglo Cucks are Anglucks. Chinese Cucks are Chucks. Russian/Moscow Cucks are Moscucks. Hindu Cucks are Hinducks. They are all playing the game of Tug-a-Jew. Jewish Power is like the most awesome bachelor, and the various cuck nations are pleading with Jews to "Marry me, fuc* me, and let me have your baby." It's truly a sorry sight. Among Anglucks, we see such putting-out behavior not only from the usual whores(in the Democratic Party, Republican Party, 'mainstream liberalism', and 'Conservatism Inc.') but from so-called Dissident Rightists like John Derbyshire whose anti-Chinese screed amounts to "We Anglucks sucky sucky you better. Master Jew, come to OUR whore house." How pathetic that these major goy powers/nations are into 'Me So Horny, Me So Horny' mode at the feet of Jewish Power.
Of course, Anglucks have a longer history of cucking to Jews. Indeed, Anglos once had power OVER Jews. They weren't always Anglucks. But what historical ironies. Adolf Hitler and Nazis appealed to Anglos in UK and US for partnership. Northern Anglo whites and Germanics as Fellow Aryans who'd rule the world together. The official narrative says the Anglos, despite being imperialist and all that, said NO to the sinister Darth-Vaderian German offer. "Luke, join the Dark Side." Anglos had supremacist tendencies and had their share of 'racism', but they had a sense of limits and were doing their best to move toward greater justice and liberty for ALL mankind. Anglos said NO to German 'Aryan' supremacism. They sided with pitiable Jews who were being victimized and slaughtered by the Nazi 'Aryan' war-machine that sought to 'conquer the world'. Then, how ironic that the very Anglos who said NO to German supremacism ended up saying YES YES YES to Jewish supremacism? And Jews, the people who've been parading themselves as the primary victims of Racial Supremacist Ideology, are now the biggest practitioners of Racial Supremacist Agenda premised on the vile conviction that any number of goy lives and liberties should be sacrificed on the altar of the Almighty Jew. If millions of Arab lives are destroyed? Who cares? If Iranian women and children are made to suffer? Let them suffer, let them die. If EU is flooded with tons of African and Muslim invaders because Wars for Israel destabilized borders in North Africa and Middle East? Let the whites be invaded and replaced. Besides, Diversity is useful for Jews in playing Divide-and-Rule among goyim. Anglos rejected one supremacist offer(of the Nazis) to end up serving the supremacism of the other(the Jews as main victims of Nazis). Of course, as the Official Victims of Supremacism, Jews get a pass on their own Supremacism. Jewish checks, no matter how costly and ridiculous(or bogus), are written off as Reparations for the Holocaust. It's the Holo-Cost.
As Anglos went from Anglo-Lords or Anglords to Anglucks, they set the template for all of the world. Following World War II, the Anglo World was richest and most powerful. US, Canada, and Australia were in great shape. UK was drained by WWII but less damaged than most major European nations. Also, its empire was still intact. Even with the decline of UK and rise of US, it was Anglo Power just the same as the ruling elites in the US were WASPS and Anglo-Americanized whites. Anglords had the supreme power.
But their Christian Moralism of guilt and redemption gave an opening to Jews. Also, there was an element of naivete and 'innocence' in the American Character owing to the official mythology of America as the Nation of Freedom, Liberty, and Equality that had broken free of old, repressive, and corrupt Europe. As such, Anglo-Americans were more sensitive to criticism of American failures. Still, Anglords would surely have kept the power if not for the presence of Jews who not only took over key industries and institutions in media and academia but used them to bait White Guilt. Also, Jewish Big Think or Propheticism seemed sexy like Ron Jeremy's dong to the Anglos who'd grown accustomed to moderation, pragmatism, empiricism, and restraint. Whether it was the Big Think of Jewish Leftists or Jewish Libertarians(like Ayn Rand), Anglos felt 'liberated' by the sheer excess of Jewish ego, confidence, and pride. (Likewise, black music had a similar effect on whites because blacks held nothing back and drew their musical energies directly from their loins.)
Initially, Jews began to gain influence over Anglo/Americans by intellectual fireworks and moral appeal. Back then, Jews didn't have the power to FORCE Anglos to change their views and values at the drop of a hat. They just seemed to make the stronger or more compelling arguments, made easier by their increasing control of the media and narrative. As such, Anglos who changed their minds in accordance to Jewish appeals were not necessarily Anglucks. But with each passing year, Anglos went more and more from Anglords to Anglucks. The children of WASP parents in elite colleges were trained to regard 'racism' as the worst crime and made to believe Jews are pure as snow in historical innocence. They grew up with Anne Frank as the new madonna and the Holocaust as the new crucifixion. And as Jews grew richer and more powerful, more whites came to realize they can't get anywhere without Jewish support. But it wasn't just the increasing influence but the consecration of Jews as Holy Holocaust Victims that made it nearly impossible to speak honestly about or challenge Jewish Power. Whether it was Democrats or Republicans, their highest concept of Morality and the Good was "We are more supportive of Israel and servile to Jewish interests."
If such dynamics had unfolded in some second-rate nation, it wouldn't have mattered much. But it happened in the US, the richest and most powerful nation on Earth. And the people who cucked to Jews were Anglos, the most dominant people around the world for at least three centuries. So, whatever Anglo-Americans did wasn't just something they did on their own with Jews. As the very national group associated with world dominance for centuries, it had a seismic effect on all the world. If Anglos, the lords of the world, cuck to Jews, it must be the New Standard for all mankind. If lowly Greeks or Mexicans had cucked to Jews but if Anglo-Americans hadn't, things would have been different. But Anglo-Americans were the guys who beat Germany and Japan. They were the guys who contained the awesome Soviet Union in the Cold War. Indeed, they'd achieved the tremendous feat of turning the North American wilderness into a superpower in a historical blip. And yet, these mighty people submitted to Jews and found themselves unable to say NO to Jews on anything. So, the ripple effect of this was HUGE. Furthermore, Anglucks didn't just submit to Jews politically and economically but 'spiritually' and 'morally'. Jews weren't merely giants but holy gods. Jews were might and right. And this holiness was associated with Jewish Victimhood, a Narrative that could be used to hide the extent of Jewish Power. So, the message around the world was 'Jews Rule America and Are Not to Mess With' but also 'You Cannot Call Out on Jewish Power'.
As Anglucks surrendered Moral Legitimacy and Political Power to the Jews, their only hope was as comprador cucks of Jews. Let Jews play first fiddle, but Anglos can at least play second fiddle IF they suck up to Jews. This mentality has seeped so deeply into the American Psyche that even those Anglos and whites who've been persecuted and de-personed by Jews do everything to win back the Jewish Affection(that never really existed in the first place). So, the National Review magazine, which cucks to Neocons, had John Derbyshire purged, but Derbyshire thinks his China-bashing will put him back in good graces with Jews. Alex Jones was de-platformed by Jews, but he pretends as if the 'Chicoms' are behind it. Jared Taylor was taken off Twitter and Paypal by the Jews — and his views are often censored on Youtube — , but his priority is always to suck up to Zionists and censor anyone on his site who calls out on Jewish Power. If Dissident Right Anglos act this way, just imagine how Anglos in Democratic and Republican Parties act. The Joe Bidens and Mitt Romneys of the world. What a pathetic bunch.
Now, why didn't Jews accept the Angluck bargain in good faith? After all, Nazi Germans would have been more than happy to form a partnership with Anglos. Indeed, Germans would have accepted an equal or even an subordinate partnership with Anglos. Germans had no designs on the British Empire. Hitler admired the Anglos and wanted to be on good graces with them. Hitler was a shit in many ways, but he did believe in mutual respect with leaders and nations he admired. We see this between Germany and Italy. Though Hitler's view of Italians wasn't much, he truly admired Mussolini and kept his end of the bargain. He did everything to make the cowardly Italians look good. After the third-rate Greeks whupped fourth-rate Italians, Hitler had Germany take Greece to save Mussolini's face. So, if Anglos had made a deal with Hitler, Hitler would have kept it: Germans and Anglos together as best friends forever.
So, why didn't Jews take this offer from the Anglos: Jewish power and Anglo power together would have been unbeatable. But there was one difference. The factor of ethno-psychology. It all hinged on how Jews saw Anglos and regarded themselves(through the imagined Anglo gaze). If the Nazis regarded Anglos as racial equals and brethren, Jews regarded Anglos as the Goy Other(and felt that Anglos, despite their all-too-sudden sentimentality about Jews, privately regarded Jews as a bunch of nasty 'kikes'). Also, if Nazi Germans regarded Anglos as equal to them in every way — intelligence, ability, vision, talent, looks, etc — , Jews felt both massive inferiority complex and superiority complex vis-a-vis the Anglos. Too many Jews who looked like Anthony Weiner and Woody Allen hated the fact that they were funny-looking compared to Anglos. Even when Anglos didn't make fun of Jews and treated them nice, Jews got into an Edgar-Allan-Poe-like paranoia about what Anglos REALLY think. It's like Woody Allen in the opening of ANNIE HALL saying he heard the guy say 'Jew Eat?' instead of 'Did you eat?' So, as long as Jews co-existed with Anglos, the very reality of Anglo looks was an affront to Jewish self-image, made all the worse by the fact that Jewish Portnoys agreed that Anglo women were preferable to Jewish women in looks, the subject of THE HEARTBREAK KID. As Jewish women rose up the ranks, they brought their own brand of neurosis into the mix from the hurt that they felt over Jewish men and society finding White Women more desirable than Jewish Women.
At the same time, Jews felt superiority complex over Anglos as they couldn't help feeling smarter, more clever, and wittier than the Anglos. Whether Woody Allen vs Anglos in his movies or Frederic Raphael's GLITTERING IMAGES, there is abrasive Jewish arrogance in beating White goyim in the arena of wit, insight, and cunning. So, both the angry inferiority-complex-side and arrogant superiority-complex-side of Jews in relation to Anglos didn't make for a stable partnership. No matter how much Anglos sucked up to them, Jews were offended & belittled by the fact that Anglos were taller & more attractive AND felt contempt & arrogance toward the less intelligent and/or more naive Anglos.
Besides, it must have been a truly piteous sight for Jews to see the once-mighty Anglos grovel at their feet. Here was this race that had conquered and ruled the world. The race that produced Douglas MacArthur and George Patton. But they were now on their knees begging the Jews, "Can I suck your cock? I will swallow." It's impossible to feel any respect for such cucky-wucks. It's one thing for poor folks in some hapless third-rate nation to act thus. But for Anglos, the world conquerors and leaders? And to a bunch of nebbish Jews? (Ethno-psychology matters. If Hitler would have kept his bargain with Anglos, he certainly didn't keep it with Stalin and the Slavs, whom he despised racially and culturally. Had Anglos cut a deal with Hitler, they were on safe ground. But Russians weren't.)
Because Anglos created the New Order, Jews formed a partnership with them, BUT it could not be equal or based on mutual respect/interest. Rather, while Jews increased Jewish Power, Jewish Identity, and Jewish Interests, Anglos were to ever decrease their own. Jews would grow more the Master while Anglos would grow more the Dog. While Jews emphasized Jewish unity among Jews of all nations and classes, they demanded that Anglos totally abandon Anglo/white identity except as a dirty epithet or smear. 'Jewish' is noble, 'White' is awful. Therefore, the Terms of Agreement in the partnership was that (1) Jews keep their identity, interests, & unity, and furthermore, whites support, defend, and honor Jewish identity, interests, & unity (2) White elites denounce white identity, white interests, & white unity, and whites may operate & succeed ONLY AS deracinated individuals IF AND ONLY IF they cuck to Jewish Power, Magic Negro Cult, and Globo-Homo-mania.
In other words, Anglos and whites can still become rich and rise up the ladder BUT only as individuals and as cuckish servants & toadies of Jewish Power and Jewish Supremacism.
And so, Anglords turned into a race of Anglucks. And as Anglo-Americanism was the template of whiteness in the US, whites of all other ethnic groups followed suit. We have Italian-Americans who follow the Angluck model. Rudy Giuliani kisses Zionist ass and wears woman's clothing at globo-homo parades. This means that while rich elite Jews can care for and champion the needs of ALL Jews, white elites could not act for white interests or white solidarity. White elites can keep their elite status ONLY IF they serve Jewish elites who stand for Jewish Unity. So, even as whites did everything to ensure and promote Jewish preservation, power, and glory, Jews did everything to chip away at white power and unity. Paradoxically, the Jewish allowance of white elite success undermined white power/interests even more. Had Jews targeted all whites for collective ruin, then ALL whites would have gotten the message that they are NOTHING in the Jewish Dominated Order. Then, there would have been white unity and resistance as smart whites would have sided with lesser whites against Jews. Jews figured that the best way to undermine white unity is to provide lots of carrots for the best-and-brightest whites who would be showered with prizes and accolades as long as (1) they sought success as atomized individuals (2) praised & revered Jews (3) denounced white identity and white pride in favor of Diversity and Jungle Fever. That way, Jews got to own the best-and-brightest whites who, otherwise, might have sided with the white masses against Jewish Power. The most effective kind of oppression is not to equally oppress all of the Other but to provide goodies to the best-and-brightest among them so that they will work for you than champion and lead their own people. (It's interesting how Jews went from appealing to white vulgar mentality to appealing to white elite mentality. When Jews were on their way up, many non-elite whites cheered the Jews as 'populist' bad boys, as with the Marx Brothers, who gave the Middle Finger to rich white snobs. Of course, the Marx Brothers ridiculed the goy in the street as well as the goy in the Ivory Tower, but the sheer anarchic energy of such Jewish comics was appealing to many whites who felt down and out. Back then, plenty of whites in the South, Midwest, and the West resented the 'Eastern Establishment' of Anglo Brahmins. So, when Jewish comedians and mavericks championed unruly class rebellion, they seemed like heroes of the Common Man. The unwashed goyim had no idea that Jews were mocking Wasp elites so that THEY THE JEWS would take over as the new elites. Once Jews did gain the status as the New Rulers of America, they no longer had use for white American populism. If Marx Brothers and the Three Stooges once used to represent Jewish comedy, Jewish humor was epitomized in the 90s by Jerry Seinfeld whose show appealed to urbane yuppie tastes and went over the heads of the hoi polloi. And then, incredibly enough, Jews even waged War on Humor as comedy and jokes could be used to mock Jewish Power and Supremacy by the likes of Sam Hyde. Of late, Nick Fuentes has used comedy to provoke Jewish Power, and Jews won't have any of it, which is why he was taken off Youtube. And today, Jews appeal to white elites in the denunciation of lowly, crude, and vulgar populism of the white working class, the very opposite of what they'd done with the Marx Brothers.)
Anglos, once the rulers of the world, turned into Anglucks. And the world realized this. They came to understand that the US, the lone superpower, is essentially about White Folks cucking to Jews. Jews are like the gods of politics, and in US as Valhalla, Angluck Warriors worship and sing praises to the Jewish gods. If Anglos and Anglo-Americanized whites, the bulk of the US(as lone superpower) act this way, then the message heard around the world is the formula for global success is to serve the Jews to gain their tolerance, approval, and blessing. (It's like Sollozzo the Turk needed Don Corleone's approval to do business in New York in THE GODFATHER.) And Jews know that the world sees Global Power this way. A people or nation won't rise to great wealth UNLESS they put out to Jews as the global godfather or godpimp. Though Anglos had been much diminished under Jewish Power, the fact is many continue to do well in the New Jewish Order only because they serve the Jews for approval and blessing.
And so, the Angluck Template led to the rise of the Chucks(Chinese Cucks), Moscucks(Moscow Cucks), and Hinducks(Hindu Cucks). Of course, there are many others such as Polucks(Polish Cucks) and Japucks(or Japanese Cucks), but as their nations are second-rate political puppets of the US empire, it doesn't really matter. They have no choice but to be cucks. But China, Russia, and India still have some degree of real sovereignty. They are not part of the US empire and therefore must make an extra effort to win over Jewish Approval and Blessing. They must play the game of Tug-A-Jew.
Of course, they play this game with a certain trepidation. They don't trust the US, and they don't trust Jews. (And they don't want to end up as pathetic as the Anglucks.) At one time, Russians did trust Jews in the 1990s and got burned real bad. Boris Yeltsin and his crew thought being Moscucks would bring many blessings. Invite Jews to fix the Russian economy, and both Jews and Russians would get richer and do well. But what did Jews do? They raped the entire economy and let countless Russians die of despair and drugs. Of course, some Russian elites did get rich by collaborating with Jews, but the Jewish-Russian bargain was like the Jewish-Anglo one. Russians could get ahead as individuals(collaborating with Jews), but they better forget about Russian solidarity or Russian nationalism. But things got so bad that it led to a backlash under Vladimir Putin who rejected the Hyper-Moscuck strategy of the 90s. Russians realized that Jews could never treat Russians on equal terms. Jews saw Russians as either collaborators or cattle. Still, Jewish Power around the world was such that Putin could not drop the Moscuck Strategy completely. Rather, he changed the dial from Hyper-Moscuckery to Moderate-Moscuckery. Of course, for Jewish Supremacists, even this was outrageous. How dare Russia not totally put out to the Jews? Don't these dumb, stupid, drunken Russians know that Anglos, once the mightiest people on Earth, totally cucked to Jews? Then, how dare the Russians not totally cave to Jewish demands? (Ukrainians totally cuck to Jews, and that's really been great!) So, that set of the Jewish War on Russia, but there still hasn't been a Russian War on Jewry because, even as Jews piss on Russia, Putin knows that Russia still needs connections to the Empire of Judea to have a role in the global economy. Putin's partial-cuckery is on display every time he meets with Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel undermines everything Russia tries to do in Syria. Jews in Israel work with Jews in the US to sanction Russia and apply pressure. But Putin has to show his philosemitic credentials by shining Netanyahu's shoes and kissing his arse.
One thing about cuckery is it breeds jealousy. While all cucks are in the same boat of cuckery, they are jealous of the affection or approval that other cucks get. It's like all dogs are dogs but envious of other dogs getting more hugs, pets on the head, or doggy-biscuits from the Master. If you give one dog something, other dogs feel resentful. If you hug one dog, other dogs want their hugs and more. Cucks are like Concubines. If one concubine is favored by the lord, other concubines feel jealous and want to knock her down a few pegs.
And this is why Anglucks, Chucks, Moscucks, Hinducks, and others sometimes go out of their way to show that they are more 'horny' and 'sucky-sucky' with the Jews as top pimp. Part of the reason why Anglucks are so hostile to China and Russia is that they see them as cuck-competitors for Jewish Blessing. "We Anglucks cuck to you Jews most, so please oh please love us most, dear master." In the 90s, the Jewish-Russian Axis became nearly a thing as Jews were totally taking over that country. Also, the Jewish-Chinese Axis began to emerge around the same time as Jewish Globalists figured on totally destroying white unity in the US by having corporate elites hire Chinese and others while dumping on the American working class. As Russian elites and the Chinese had much to gain from this New Order, they cucked to Jewish globalists. Though Anglucks didn't publicly protest this(as they were totally afraid of their Jewish Masters), they were feeling jealous and neglected. Instead of strengthening the Jewish-Anglo partnership, Jews seemed to be forming New Partnerships with other would-be cucks. Israel was building Jewish centers in China. The Jewish-Chinese marriage became a big thing in elite circles. China fawned on Jews, and Jewish Media promoted closer US-China ties in the 1990s and 2000's. Around the same time, Thomas Friedman was traveling in India and promoting the Hindu-Jew or HinJew partnership. Jews seeme to think it'd be a neat idea to replace many white professionals with Hindu ones. Google hired a Hinduck as CEO. Jewish Disney figured on bringing over tons of Hindus to replace white managers and professionals. Anglucks were feeling sad and blue over such developments, but if the Jewish Master wanted it, what could they do?
But the Covid-19 crisis offers an opportunity for the Anglucks to win back the affection of their Master. Even though Jews spearheaded globalism and made all those deals with Chucks and Hinducks, Anglucks don't blame the Jews. Instead, they hope to regain the status as the main cuck-darling of the Jews. So, Anglucks make noises about, "Look Master, Chucks lied and People died. Chucks are bad, so please love us Anglucks, dear master." Hinducks see an opening too. "Oh, Jewish Master, Chucks are bad news, so please send bulk of the global economy our way to India, and we Hinducks will serve you most loyally like that Uncle Dot.com CEO at Google." And I'm sure Chucks will look for some pathetic way to appeal to Jews by sucking up to Israel more, cutting ties with Iran, and collaborating with World Jewry to suppress white identity.
It's all so pitiful. It's time for Russians to stop being Moscucks. Chinese must stop being Chucks, and Indians must stop being Hinducks. Maybe they see themselves as just playing the game, but Jews always win because they got so many cuck-suitors willing to take it up the ass. These nations need to learn to live within their means. Let Anglucks have the Jews. Anglucks may believe their future is bright as the main 'partners' of the awesome Jews, but they are doomed. Even if Jews once again chose Anglucks as their main cuck-allies, they will continue to do everything to reduce whites to a occupied and defeated people who must always take orders from Jews, be demographically replaced by diversity, and be sexually Afro-colonized. If Anglucks are so eager to serve such a master, the world should let them have it.
Many people say the Iraq War was America’s biggest foreign policy failure, but there was something far worse. It was the Anglo-American elite’s decision to support Zionism at the expense of the Palestinians and other Arabs/Muslims in the larger region. (One could argue that America’s biggest foreign policy disaster was the decision to import all those aggressive and muscled black Africans, but it happened BEFORE the colonials gained national independence to forge their own destiny.) In more ways than one, America’s decision to support Zionism was its worst moral failure as well, one that would have grave consequences and implications, especially as Jews gained the dominant position in American media, academia, finance, politics, and culture.
Now, why the argument that America’s Pro-Zionist and Anti-Palestinian policy was its most soul-destroying decision? After all, there are plenty of critics and arch-moralists who find ‘sin’ after ‘sin’ in America’s history of ‘genocide’ of the native Indians, the exploitation of black slaves, the mistreatment of Chinese railroad workers & the ‘internment’ of Japanese in America, territorial expansionism(especially against Mexico), and involvement in destructive wars in the Age of Empire, World War I, World War II, and the Cold War(especially in Korea and Vietnam). Compared to all such events where literally countless peoples suffered or died, why should we concern ourselves with what happened to the Palestinians? One might say, "Sure, Palestinians got it in the neck, but it didn’t involve mass killings, and it all happened on a tiny piece of territory." If we judge history merely in terms of scale or sheer bulk, one might indeed say that the fulfillment of the Zionist project was relatively minor in the grand scheme of things. And yet, history isn’t just about WHAT happened but WHY. Furthermore, it matters WHO were involved and what was implied by the event in the development of future events. After all, Jews didn’t merely take over Palestine but the US itself. If Jews had prevailed in Palestine/Israel but not in the US, they would have been like the Albanians who came out on top in Kosovo but have virtually no influence over the US, let alone the world. But because of what Jews managed to pull off in the US — topple and replace the Anglo-American elites who’d founded and ruled the nation since its inception — , what they did in Palestine came to direct and define their grand design for White America itself.
Though there were plenty of world events in which the US committed greater horrors and atrocities than what transpired in Palestine(as result of Anglo-American backing of Zionism), the motivations involved in the latter make the American decision all the more inexcusable. Consider the Cold War that began around the time of the destruction of Palestine and creation of Israel. Even though the US, along with the USSR, made series of morally dubious policy decisions and committed many unspeakable horrors(and supported militarist regimes, especially in South America, that used ‘death squads’ to terrorize and even exterminate local populations), they were part of a grand struggle between the totalitarian communist East and democratic capitalist West. Given the dire fate of the world were it to fall under communist rule, America’s heavy-handed role as the policeman of the ‘Free World’ seemed a ‘necessary evil’ at the time. Though the US often stained its reputation with its actions around the globe, its sphere seemed preferable to the Soviet sphere mired in communist stagnation, political repression, culture of fear, and even mass domestic violence(that dwarfed anything within the democratic capitalist West). A great power is like an elephant. Its sheer size and power make collateral damage(a lot of it) unavoidable. If a good or ‘gooder’ elephants fights a bad or ‘badder’ elephant, even the good or ‘gooder’ one will end up doing lots of damage to those animals and plants in the vicinity. It’s like the movie KING KONG VS GODZILLA where the clash of monsters leads to much human calamity regardless of which fella wins.
Given the nature of the Cold War, both the US and USSR often found themselves making Big decisions with grave consequences, especially for weak and small nations that were caught in between. It was the nature of the game, tragic and unfortunate but unavoidable given the scale and stakes involved. And it really was a global conflict where win-or-lose between the two superpowers would impact every corner of the world. Given the ideological, cultural, political, economic, and military antagonism between the US and the USSR, this really was History on the grandest of scales.
Much the same could be said for other big events, movements, commitments, and/or conflicts the US has been involved with. Though the European conquest of North America was tragic for the native Indian tribes, many of whom died by disease or bullets and all of whom permanently lost their sacred hunting and burial grounds to the White Man(and immigrant-invaders), it was inevitable when the high civilization of the West embarked upon what were vast sparsely inhabited territories with boundless soil and resources, most of which couldn’t be exploited by the Indians who were primitive savages. There was too much good land with too few people, and it was only natural that a more advanced people with greater numbers and technology would take over the land were they to 'discover' it. Just like Russians expanded into the vast territories of Siberia and the Han peoples moved into Tibet and Muslim territories of Central Asia, white people were going to take the New World as the natives were either lacking in resistance to Old World diseases and/or too few in number(especially in North America) to stem the tide of a people far more numerous, adventurous, technologically developed, and spiritually inspired. If white people hadn’t done it, any people from the Old World with the numbers, adequate technology, and navigational risk-taking would have done much the same. So, even as we acknowledge the tragic dimensions of the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians, it was one of those 'natural' events in history given the circumstances and factors that came into play, especially at a time when empire-building was universally recognized as the name of the game. Also, as John Wayne said, the American Indians were too few sitting on too much land and doing little with it when so much could be done, and it just so happened that it was whites, especially Anglos and Germanics, who had the spirit, will, and know-how to make it all work in the creation of the richest and most powerful nation on Earth.
And something similar can be said about America’s taking of the SW territories from Mexico. In some ways, it was a ‘shit move’, but then, both US and Mexico had come into existence through imperialism and expansion. So, the real ownership of the SW territories really depended on which side had greater vision, enterprise, resourcefulness, and fighting spirit. And it sure wasn’t the Mexicans, not least because the White Hispanic elites were in a state of stagnation & dissipation(at least compared to their Northern European counterparts) and, besides, urged their brown subjects to be timid, obedient, and humble than bold, energetic, and individualistic(because an excitable populace might just decide to overthrow the ruling elites, as the energized Jews took power from the enervating Wasps in the US). Of course, there was also the matter of genetics as the native Indios of ‘Latin America’ were an Asiatic people by origin and shared some of the submissive traits of their racial cousins across the Pacific Ocean. Anyway, given the nature of how both US and Mexico came into being, the tug-of-war for the SW territories was a kind of ‘great game’ where the bigger power simply swallowed a massive chunk of the weaker power. Mexicans have reasons to gripe about what happened, but they were also in the imperialist game and simply lost. After all, much of SW territories were inhabited by American Indians who fiercely resisted both Anglo-American settlers and Mexican troops. Americans took from Mexico what Mexico had taken from the American Indians.
As for slavery, it was an institution that the US inherited from colonial times when its territories had been part of the British Empire. By the principles by which the new nation was established, there should have been no place for slavery. And yet, even slavery could be explained in terms of economic necessity. While one may argue that it was motivated by greed, the fact is blacks were uniquely equipped to work better and survive in the hot malarial conditions of the American South. While morally indefensible, one could see how white people simply couldn’t resist the economic benefits that could be had from use of black slaves. In material terms, it was a ruthlessly rational decision. While we can condemn those reasons, they made economic sense that made political sense as political power grows out of economic power. White people were not trying to be gratuitously cruel with slavery. Rather, they were motivated by rational economic calculations even if they had to turn off a part of their heart.
As for America’s participation in the overseas Imperial Game beginning in the late 19th century, it was very much in vogue in world affairs. It was the belief among the major powers that they either expand or wither. As the West had advanced so far ahead of the Rest, it possessed the means to smash down barriers — even in the once forbidding China — , and so, global power came down to a matter of which white power(though joined by the Japanese as a kind of honorary white power) grabbed more than the other. In the Age of Empire, power was fluid in the sense that an expanding empire, even if small, would grow ever larger whereas a shrinking empire, even if huge, would grow ever smaller. Spanish Empire had once been many times bigger than the British Empire, but Spanish power diminished with its inability to keep expanding, whereas the British Empire grew ever larger. The thinking back then was that an imperial equilibrium was impossible, i.e. if an empire was merely content to keep what it already had, it would lose out to the more aggressive empire that kept looking to expand its range and possessions. Thus, enough was never enough for the British, French, Russians, and etc. In their eyes, the Spanish and the Ottoman empires were doomed because both had lost the will, means, and the drive to keep expanding. For a time, Japan and Germany also caught the imperial bug, seeking their ‘day in the sun’. Given the nature of the global power game, the US also joined in once continental America had been fully conquered, on its way to developing into a rich and powerful modern nation. So, even though some of the things the US did in the Philippines were terrible, it was the sign of the times where the game of empire was on the minds of all those aspiring to have their ‘day in the sun’. Revisionists might point to the conduct of America in World War I and World War II as deeply problematic, even evil and hardly better than the war crimes carried out by its enemies. But, however one may feel about the America's roles in those wars, the fact is all sides did horrible things, and we can well understand how nations and entire peoples could easily lose their basic sense of humanity and morality in wartime.
Poland in World War II
In contrast, it’s difficult to excuse what the US did to the Palestinians. Whatever one may say of America’s involvement with the American Indians, slavery, SW territories, or the game of empire(especially prior to World War I), a tremendous deal was at stake. The vanquishing of the American Indians was necessary for there to be America. Black slaves were economically valuable in Southern Plantations. The US could do so much with the SW territories than Mexico ever could. And when the major powers were all looking to expand as much as possible and dominate the sea routes, the US believed it had to play the game or live in a world where control of the oceans would fall to rivals, not just the Great Britain(who were at least fellow Anglos) but other rising powers as well. As US was destined to be a great power, it feared being relegated to irrelevance in what was still the Age of Empire.
But Palestine? What happened there had zero economic or military impact on the US. It had nothing to do with American survival, security, status, or prosperity. If whites hadn’t taken the land from the American Indians, the US would never have existed. If the US hadn’t taken the SW territories from Mexico, it would have been considerable smaller and Mexico considerably larger. So, on such matters, regardless of whether they were good or bad, we can at least understand why the US did what it did for rational, material, political, and/or military reasons.
In contrast, exactly what did the US gain by having Palestine destroyed? The principle here is the difference between necessary evil and gratuitous evil. All forms of ‘evil’ are deeply unpleasant, but at least a 'necessary evil' serves an essential purpose. Eating human flesh is hideous, but if one must do so in order to survive, we can at least understand why it was done as a ‘necessary evil’(as lost and stranded explorers have done). But imagine someone who practices cannibalism for reasons that have nothing to do with survival. Now, imagine someone who steals a loaf of bread because he is starving. Stealing is wrong, but we can understand his motivation to relieve his hunger. But if someone steals just to steal, it is much worse.
On the matter of the destruction of Palestine, the US has no good excuse(and of course, most of the convoluted excuses were made by vile Jews like Alan Dershowitz). Now, Jews themselves did have powerful and impassioned reasons for wanting the land and turning it into a Jewish Homeland, Israel. Jews do have ancient roots in the land that's always been holy(or deeply significant) in their eyes. Then, if Zionism was a matter of contention between Palestinians and Jews, it would more understandable as both peoples had deep connection to the territory. But, when the US backed the destruction of Palestine to make way for Israel, the US was not only overwhelmingly gentile(as it still is today) but was ruled by Anglo-Americans, not Jews. If the US back then had been as thoroughly Jewish-controlled as it is today, we could better understand the motivations of the US-Jewish elites in their brazen support of Israel. But back then, Jews had yet to gain ruling status. Now, one might argue that the US, being a Christian nation, wanted to reclaim the Holy Land from the Arabs/Muslims, but such reasoning doesn’t wash because the Holy Land was handed over to Jews than came into possession by the Christian West. At least when the Crusades happened centuries ago, it was about Christians taking the turf from the Muslims(and Jews as collaborators of Muslims), but in 1948, Christian America for some reason decided to go out on a limb to alter the destiny of a people, the Palestinians, who had never done any wrong to Americans in order to indulge the Jews who were already exhibiting all kinds of problematic tendencies.
History is filled with countless tragedies and ‘crimes’, but it is more justified or at least understandable IF supported by passion(especially vengeful), justice, or ambition(or even greed). While greed is hardly a noble quality, it is still nevertheless human. Someone who causes harm to enrich himself is still more recognizably human than someone who causes harm for no material benefit whatsoever. It’s like eating dogs is awful, but someone who kills a dog for food is still more human than someone who kills a dog for no discernible benefit to himself. Though many have observed that US levels of violence in World War II and Cold War conflicts were clearly overkill, one could still understand the passion or ‘justice’ behind them. In retrospect, the US bombings of Germany and Japan seem like overkill and the use of nukes on Hiroshima & Nagasaki seem downright psychotic, and yet, war drives all sides crazy, and many Americans were livid against Japan that had pulled off a sneak attack. And given Germany’s many war crimes, the Allies wanted to make Germans get a taste of their own medicine. As for US conflicts during the Cold War, there was a sense of ‘justice’(though also among the communist side) that seemed to justify extraordinary means to contain the ‘evil empire’ of Marxism-Leninism. At the very least, we can understand why Americans hated the ‘Japs’ or felt justified in using any means necessary to push back against the ‘commies’.
But such cannot be said of what the US did to the people of Palestine. Palestinians didn’t attack the US navy at Pearl Harbor or anywhere for that matter. (If any attack resembles Pearl Harbor, it was the Israeli assault on USS Liberty in 1967 with the full knowledge of it being an American ship.) There was no reason for the US to feel any kind of animus toward Palestinians who’d only been minding their own business on their own turf for as far as anyone could remember. There was no ideological reason to destroy Palestine as it was not some radical ally of the USSR. (If anything, many more Zionists had socialist-communist sympathies, which is why Josef Stalin initially courted the Zionists as potential allies and agents.) Then, for no rhyme or reason, moral or material, the US decided to have an entire people destroyed.
There’s a saying in the Bible, "For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and to lose his soul?" To that, one may respond, "Well, gaining the world at the expense of one’s soul is still some kind of valid reason." While, from the spiritual viewpoint, the soul is more important than worldly power, the latter is nevertheless nothing to sneer at. In a way, one might say that the history of the US has been about gaining the world by losing one’s soul... which may be the reason why Americans have gone out of their way to moralize their history in order to justify what has essentially been the inexorable triumph of materialism. Anyway, the point is that gaining-the-world would still be worthy as a political goal. (All throughout history, states chose 'the world' over 'the soul' when push came to shove. Buddhism didn't make the Japanese lay down the arms at any time in their history.) Both keeping one’s soul by sacrificing worldly ambition and losing one's soul to gain the world could be recognized as worthy objectives, and the modern West admires both the spiritual leader and the material go-getter. The real quandary could be posed as follows: "What does it profit a man to lose his soul to gain nothing?" When America ‘lost its soul’ time and time again to ‘gain the world’, it made some sense. But when America decided to lose its soul by destroying Palestine, what was that about? By losing its soul, what did it gain in return or recompense? Losing one’s soul to get nothing is infinitely worse than losing one’s soul to get something. When the US ‘lost its soul’ by ‘stealing’ the SW territories from Mexico, it got something, indeed a lot. Furthermore, it was good for Many Americans as those vast lands provided opportunities for countless Americans to try their luck at better life and more wealth. Even if something is morally dubious, it is partly validated by the good it provides to many people. If it is illegal to hunt moose but if I kill one anyway to feed a large clan, I’ve broken the law but nevertheless done something that’s good for my kinfolks. I would have acted as a river-to-my-people. But suppose I break the law and hunt a rare precious bird to serve the vanity of someone who not only isn’t a member of the clan but tends to be rather(and even radically) hostile to my folks. What would have been the purpose of such lawbreaking that cannot even be justified on the basis of utilitarian principles? If my family is starving and I illegally hunt an animal to feed them, that makes some sense, but suppose I decide instead to steal money to purchase expensive cognac for someone who isn’t part of the family and, if anything, feels contempt toward me and seeks to reduce my family to pieces of commodity to be controlled by his ilk. Would that make any sense? What the white race did for the Jews wasn’t merely a case of losing one’s soul but one's sanity as well.
Of course, one could argue that the American decision had something to do with the Shoah(aka the Holocaust), but that’s bogus as (1) the Zionist project had begun before Adolf Hitler was even born and (2) Israel was founded AFTER the Germans lost WWII and Europe was safe from the Nazis. A more likely rationale was the hope among the Anglo-American elites that the highly talented and fast-rising Jews would become Good Grateful Americans and valuable allies of Wasps IF Jewish demands for US support for Zionism was placated. Especially as World Jewry played(Yojimbo-like) the US against the USSR, there might have been a fear among Wasps that if they didn’t support Israel, all those talented Jews would sympathize with the USSR and/or grow more radical & subversive and create troubles for the West. If such apprehensions did tip the balance to support Zionism among the Anglo-American elites, one might argue that there was an element of rational calculation and self-interest among the whites. But such thinking on their part indicates a lack of confidence, awareness, and what might be called ‘historical providence’.
Even back then, did the Wasp elites surmise that Jews would surpass them in power and privilege, and therefore, they had to get a head start in being nice to Jews who would eventually be their masters? Or, did the Wasp elites regard Jews as a pesky bunch of agitators(for tribal or radical interests) who could be assuaged with some concessions? Let Jews have Palestine with the backing of the US, and maybe they’ll finally shut up and stop being so pushy. At any rate, it seems the Wasps seriously lacked foresight as to how trends and events would eventually play out. Surely, some Wasps did understand the threat posed by rising Jewish power(especially in media, academia, and finance), but they were disregarded and eventually denounced by fellow Liberal Wasps(soon followed by 'mainstream' Conservative Wasps) as alarmist, irrational, and 'fear-mongering'. Besides, an open and welcoming attitude is usually more pleasant than a closed and wary one. At most times, all of us want to be kindly, trusting, and friendly with everyone. But if one wastes one’s hospitality/generosity with the wrong kind of people, it will spell doom sooner than later. After all, anyone with sense decides whom to invite or not to his abode. An open house is destined to be a dilapidated house. Now, things might have worked out well for whites and Jews IF INDEED the Liberal Wasps had been correct about the good, decent, and honorable nature of Jews. They were dead wrong. And of course, due to the horrors of World War II — in which the radical European right disgraced itself with wars, acts of genocide, and alliance with Japan that attacked the US — , the Right all over the world was on the moral defensive.
Still, given the threat of communism(and its many crimes carried out by Jewish Bolsheviks) and the Cold War, there were many opportunities for the White Right in US and Europe to marshal their forces against the Radical Left, the Jews, and sappy White Liberals with a soft spot for communism and Jewish Power. But unfortunately, people on the Right were considerably less likely to become involved with arts & letters, academia, and media. For every National Review, there were many more Liberal Journals. And to give the Liberals their due, they were often more interesting thinkers because of their greater curiosity and finer sensibility, at least prior to the rise of Youth Consumer Culture & the booming of vanity-idolatry(that turned ideology into 'idology') that turned Liberalism into mostly cultural trash and intellectual juvenilia.
In the long run, what proved to be especially fatal was the Right(and the Left)’s abandonment of the Jewish Question. Given what happened in World War II and the Shoah, it was understandable why people felt that Jews needed a grace period. But given the dramatic rise of Jewish Power and its closeted supremacist ends, there was a necessity for strong criticism of Jewish Power, if only as checks and balances against what could well turn out to be the New Ruling Elite. This could have been done responsibly, AT ONCE denouncing the horrid excesses of Nazism & fully recognizing Adolf Hitler as a pathological demagogue AND addressing Jewish attitudes, behaviors, & historical ‘crimes’ that had led to much animus against them in so many peoples and nations. It’s like one can feel sympathy for the Soviets/Russians who were ravaged by the Nazi invasion while, at the same time, condemning the historical ‘crimes’ of Soviet Communism(especially Stalinism) and the aggressive reach of Russian Imperialism. Similarly, one can harshly criticize the American use of atomic bombs on the civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki while being fully aware of the fact that Japan played an aggressive imperialist game and triggered off ever-bigger wars that brought it to ruin(and led to the deaths of millions of Chinese and other Asian peoples). Historical Morality is not a game of either/or because all humans are more animals than angels, and this is no different with the Jews. But for some reason, the Western world has been spellbound to regard Jews as eternally blameless on account of the Shoah. So, never mind what Jews are doing in the present. If you call out on bad Jewish behavior, you are an ‘Anti-Semite’ or ‘Nazi’. And this logic seems to apply to all future Jewish behavior and even retroactively revise all of Jewish History whereby, in any given conflict between Jews and non-Jews, we must remind ourselves that Jews were the innocent party who’d been wronged by the Evil Goyim who, for some godforsaken reason, entirely lost their sanity & decency and descended like a pack of rabid wolves upon the wonderful, innocent, and helpless Jews. Such mind-set would be amusing if Jews were a powerless people like drunken Eskimos or fat Hawaiians, but it’s downright deadly(for all of humanity) in a world in which World Jewry constitute the greatest power.
Even though the West is said to be a ‘liberal democracy’, the political psychology is closer to that in North Korea. In a true liberal democracy, there shouldn’t be taboos about power. After all, unlike a monarchy or dictatorship, a democracy is a system where you, I, or anyone should be able to freely discuss the problems of power and who has more of it and where and how. We should be able to say the Emperor wears no clothes. But if there are powerful taboos governing the discussion and critique of power, the system would be liberal democratic in form but theocratic and/or cultist in function. In North Korea, which is certainly not a liberal democracy, it is taboo to have negative thoughts about the leader and the Party. Indeed, it’s not even permissible to be neutral about the Power. One has to be sincerely enthusiastic to the point of hysterics in support of Fat Ugly Kim as the greatest thing since kimchi and dog-soup.
When we survey Western Political Culture, it is liberal democratic in the sense that there are elections, a press independent of the state(though all of media are owned by a handful of oligarchs to be sure), rights of free speech, and the culture of speaking truth to power. But all such guarantees and considerations are emotionally and psychologically(and even ‘spiritually’) overridden by the pull of PC or ‘woke’ sanctimony about Jews, blacks, and homos. We are not supposed to think factually, rationally, or critically about those three groups who are so prominent in media, academia, finance, law firms, sports, pop music, comedy, fashion, arts, politics, and/or crime. So many people have been led to revere Jews as the Holy Holocaust people who are above criticism. And blacks have been ‘sacralized’ via MLK & Mandela cult, To Kill a Mocking Bird, & Slavery Narrative(as if they are the only people to have known slavery) AND sensationalized via sports, music, and sex culture; the combination of ‘sacralization’ and sensationalization has turned blacks into objects of worship among so many whites who are now stricken with the Mandela/Mandingo Complex. And then, there is the term ‘homophobia’ that would have us believe that any negative aspersion about homos and their behavior is a kind of mental malady that has no basis in fact and no backing in morality(or even spirituality). So, if you find sodomy or homo-fecal-penetration, not to mention tranny penis-cutting, to be gross and putrid, the problem is with YOU. According to the PC ‘idology’ of Wokery, a penis up a bunghole or knife slicing a penis(to make way for a fake ‘vagina’) is what the rainbow is all about, and this homo-sanctified ‘rainbow’ now drapes every other church with the full urging of Jews.
For so many people in the so-called Liberal Democratic West, certain topics cannot be broached honestly, freely, and/or empirically because such might ‘trigger’ those who hold certain idols and ideals to be sacrosanct and beyond criticism or reproach. And certain terms have ‘mantric’ powers to induce hallucinations, rapture, or hysteria(such as KKK sightings even at Oberlin college). And so many people respond to certain idols and images in the way that the Catholic faithful used to with sightings of miracles or demons. Jewish-run Hollywood has essentially become the New Cathedral for secular America. From movies and TV shows so many people in the West pick up their notions of who/what are holy and unholy. Due to all those KKK tropes, so many idiots think the Klan is still a force in American politics. KKK has become something everyone loves-to-hate. One's righteous animus against it makes for neo-spiritual vibes in a world without God. Such mass mentality has created a political culture in which Jews, blacks, and homos cannot be discussed critically — notice how even as Jews, blacks, and homos beat up on Donald Trump and GOP, most of what we hear from The Donald and his followers is "We love Israel, we love blacks, and Trump has done more for ‘gays’ around the world" — and where all the blame irrationally falls on ‘white supremacy’ and its legacy. (Btw, if the US is such a great nation, one where billions of people dream of moving to, shouldn’t ‘white supremacy’ be credited with its creation and development since America would have been inconceivable without white people, especially of Anglo, Celtic, and Germanic stock, constituting the vast majority and dominating the helm of leadership, management, and planning? If America had instituted ‘open borders’ policy from the very outset and let in all the world, the nation that we know as America would never have come to fruition. It was white success that attracted the world, and that success wouldn't have been possible without 'white supremacy': White Successupremacy. If white adventurousness, white conquest, white settlement, and white solidarity all constituted ‘white supremacy’ and given that this formula led to the rise of the richest and most powerful nation on Earth, isn’t it about time we gave ‘white supremacy’ its due as the most essential formula in the making of America as a great nation?) Given the taboos that govern speech and politics in the West — furthermore, there are now laws in EU and deep state antics in the US that effectively ban free speech and honest criticism — , the current West is a liberal democracy in body only. In heart and mind, it functions much like North Korea, what with its cultist idolization of certain groups & figures and witch-hunting demonization of certain views & ideas as ‘hate speech’ and certain groups(especially whites) as more guilty than others. By the way, if whites must answer for their ‘collective guilt’ for all the bad things they’ve done, why shouldn’t they feel ‘collective pride’ for all the great things(science, philosophy, literature, arts, technology, medicine, etc.) that came from the West?
Of course, none of this makes sense, but then, it’s impossible to speak sensibly and rationally with people with cultist mentalities that not only foster dogmatism and stupidity but total lack of self-awareness, as with all those Liberals who decry the ‘McCarthy Era’ while foaming at the mouth about Russian Collusion and how Putin is under every bed cover in the US. Among both Conservatives and Liberals, most Americans are now pathetically stupid and idiotic. Their political mentality is akin to dogs seeking approval from the master. Just like a dog will fetch any stick or hunt any animal to win approval from its master, your average PC libby-dib or cuckservative chases after prey(real or imaginary) to win plaudits(and hopefully prizes) from the Master Class made up of Bugs(Busy Urban Globalist Semites, aka Jews) and comprador Wasps. They are driven by emotions hardly different from those of dogs. Just like dogs are incapable of figuring out anything on their own and depend on their masters to tell them what to love and what to hate, these PC morons act accordingly to be rewarded with the most pets on the head. Just like the Catholic Church for so long determined what the mindless Faithful should revere or revile, it is Jewish Power(especially of media, academia, and Hollywood) that fills the minds of countless minions in the West as to what must be consecrated(especially Anno Sodomini) or desecrated(such as Confederate monuments and anything with too many 'white males').
Spend some time going deep down the rabbit hole of the comments on this former Harvard med school dean's tweet. These are medical elites. This is their obsessive ideology. We live in an age of disintegration... https://t.co/6UusCw1U5f
Most people are stupid and shallow. Consider how easy it was for Mao Zedong to inflame all those Red Guards to rampage around China and destroy Old Culture. Though Mao urged the young to rebel, they had to be told what to rebel against. Of course, they couldn’t rebel against the most powerful man in China who was none other than Mao himself. So, their ‘rebellion’ was really an act of blind obedience in service to Emperor Mao who was merely using the Red Guard thugs to destroy his rivals, real or perceived. In the current West, most of what is called 'the resistance', 'the left', 'progressives', 'antifa', and 'radicals' are the tools of the Power, which is Jewish-Zionist, globalist, capitalist, and imperialist. Just like Red Guards were duped into thinking they were 'rebels', most of today's 'rebellious' voices are the favored pets of Global Capitalism that concocted the bogeyman of 'white supremacism' in order to channel youthful rage against anything but themselves. (In some ways, the proglodytes are worse than the Red Guards who were, at the very least, Chinese nationalists. Today cucky-wuck 'left' is about whites being led by Jews to hate other whites to get their virtue-highs.)
In a way, paradoxically enough, the prideful notion of ‘liberal democracy’ has blinded people in the West to how illiberal and undemocratic they’ve become, especially under the rule of Jewish supremacist globalists. Because it’s been drummed into them that they’re living in ‘democracy’(as opposed to autocracies like, say, Russia or China), they don’t think to really examine the freedoms and rights that have been compromised under the power of Jews who use monopolistic corporate leverage to suppress certain viewpoints(mainly by professionally deplatforming ‘white nationalists’ & denying them livelihoods) AND use state power to suppress certain activities(such as BDS movement that calls for justice for Palestinians who are slated to be replaced in the remaining West Bank territories). But seriously, how free is the West when individuals can be imprisoned for tweets in the UK or when patriots who oppose mass-invasion are routinely targeted by the courts & police in France? And if democracy still works in the West, how come UK still hasn’t made Brexit work? And what kind of ‘free press’ does the US have when 95% of the outlets are owned by a handful of Jewish oligarchs? Or when virtually every politician is a whore of oligarchs like Sheldon Adelson or the Pritzkers? And what kind of liberal democracy uses extensive PC speech codes(and even encourages Antifa thugs) to silence genuinely dissenting views, especially against white people who seek liberation from Jewish supremacist hegemony? How odd that the PC idiots of the West scream ever louder about their pride in liberal democracy while using the most illiberal and undemocratic means to get what they want or, more precisely, what the Jewish oligarchic class wants. As it turns out, most PC folks have no power and only bark like dogs to feel ‘good’ about themselves as morally superior to those demonized by Jews as evil. Just like dogs have no understanding of the real agenda and are anxious to win approval from their masters, most PC whites are utterly clueless about how they’ve been mentally colonized and manipulated by Jewish globalist supremacists who control the institutions and industries of media, academia, courts, entertainment, and the deep state. Virtually every one of these PC minion clowns, having no mind of his or her own, has been instilled as what to think and how to feel by TV, movies, advertising, publishing, and etc., the monopolized sources of Jewish Power. Just like the world was in the dark as to the source of the Nile River until English explorers finally found it, most people have no clue as to the source of the snake-oil they’ve drunken to their gills. But then, did the Chinese who were addicted to opium really think hard about where it came from and whom it was enriching?
Anyway, we now see the full ramifications of the Anglo-American support of Zionism: Jewish supremacism that is totally out-of-control and eyes the white population as the New Palestinians to be replaced all around the West. To Jews, the West is just a bigger West Bank, and in some ways, white people are more helpless than the Palestinians. At the very least, Palestinians are empowered with the full knowledge that Jews are their oppressors and speak honestly among themselves as to what must be done to stop the total Zionist destruction of remaining Palestine. Palestinians are poor and powerless in numbers and materials, but they have the power of truth when it comes to Jewish tyranny. In contrast, white people in America, Canada, Australia, and Europe have the ample numbers and means to confront and push back against Jewish Power, but they are utterly helpless because (1) their cuck elites have been bought and/or blackmailed by the Jewish oligarchs — much like Senator Geary in THE GODFATHER PART II — and (2) so many whites have been mentally colonized by Jews, indeed to the extent that both the white ‘right’ and white ‘left’ regard Jews as people possessed of timeless wisdom and noble goodwill. A Jew can show up in any elite realm of the West and expect to have the red carpet rolled out to him or her as a heaven-sent creature, almost as if he or she is second coming of christ. A JEW is speaking to us. Get on your knees and listen to every word with utmost concentration, reverence, and rapture.
To free and sane minds, the bogus nonsense peddled by the likes of Barbara Specter(who says Europe can only survive by being mass-replaced by foreigners as ‘New Europeans’) and hideous Donna Zuckerberg(the sister of the Mark the Zionist gangster) is obvious disingenuous and demented. But hey, they are Holy Jews, one of the Holy Three who have the power to make white people teary-eyed and eager for benediction from their approval and forgiveness! As such, they not only have the financial backing of the Power but are automatically thought of as possessing special knowledge and wonderful advice for all mankind. And so, all those with colonized-than-free-minds lend their ears to those hideous Jews. What happens to people who trust Jews? Well, what happened to the Palestinians who trusted the Zionist immigrants who assured them that there was NO agenda to turn Palestine into a Jewish-majority state? If Jews pulled a fast one on Palestinians(and feel zero remorse about it), what makes white people think Jews will treat them any better? Paradoxically, the more white folks support the Zionist destruction of Palestine, the more Jews will do the same to white people. It's like the opening scene of PAT GARRETT & BILLY THE KID when what Garrett did to the Kid comes full circle to finish him off as well. There are, of course, wise Jews and decent Jews, but most Jews will seek tribal power above universal justice, something they don’t believe in except to dupe and disarm goyim who stand in the way of Jewish supremacism. It’s like people use a sword against the other, not against oneself. To Jews, universalism is a weapon to demean goyim as ‘racists’ and ‘xenophobes’, thereby weakening their defenses, all the while they themselves stick with their zealous tribalism that is so insistent on identity, history, and territoriality, even special privilege and supremacy.
America’s moral favoritism of Jews makes no historical sense because Jewish Tragedy was NOT a part of American History(which is precisely why Jews have drawn comparisons between Anglo-American 'crimes' and Nazi German horrors to create a kind of Parallel Guilt, a ploy that has worked effectively among so many childlike whites devoid of sense and wits; so even though white Americans didn't wrong Jews, they did things to non-Jews that were supposedly similar to the Holocaust, especially as both Anglo-Americans and Germans were inspired by the worst of sins, 'racism'). However one may feel about American Indians, blacks, or Mexicans, there is no denying that the continent was taken from American Indians(whose demise is considered by some as ‘genocide’), that blacks were exploited as slaves & racially discriminated against, and that SW territories were forcibly wrested from Mexico(with much lingering violence between the two communities). Also, the US committed horrible deeds in overseas wars. So, if the US were to feel a degree of ‘collective guilt’ about something and attempt to make amends, it would at least be understandable within the context of US history. But what does the US owe to Jews who were never victims in the New World(and if anything, worked with whites to plunder the land and destroy the natives)? America wasn’t taken from Jews(like Palestine was taken from Palestinians). If anything, Jewish merchants sold guns and ammo to whites to kill Indians with. Jews were no less 'racist' than the whites. America didn’t enslave the Jews. If anything, Jews in the South owned slaves and ran the finances of the slave economy. The US didn’t create the Nazi Party, nor did it start the acts of aggression that led to World War II. If anything, Jews attracted much hatred, hostility, and distrust in Europe for their radical will, prophetic zealotry, or subversive obsessions either as capitalists or communists. Whether Ayn Rand or Karl Marx, Jewish personality had an arrogant way of pushing things to the limit. Just like so many big dumb goy characters eventually end up wanting to break every bone of Chico, Harpo, and Groucho in Marx Brothers — patience has its limits — , it’s understandable why so many Europeans became ‘antisemitic’ as the crazy Jews were tireless in driving everyone up the wall, using either finance capitalism, radical communism, and/or cultural subversion to turn everything upside down. (Consider how Globo-Homo-Mania came to supplant Christianity in the US thanks to Jewish power and influence. Consider how Jews have utterly pornified American culture, even turning Disney into what might be called ‘Jizzney’. And Jews now peddle gambling like they once peddled opium to the Chinese. Jews get richer, goyim get poorer.)
If the US must make up for its historical ‘sins’, why has there been all this stuff about Jews, ‘antisemitism’, and the Holocaust? (And if America's 'original sin' is 'racism' against blacks, then how does it improve matters for the US to support Jewish supremacist policies in the West Bank and Gaza where the discrimination and terror go far beyond anything in Jim Crow South or Apartheid South Africa? According to Desmond Tutu, South Africa during Apartheid was nothing like what is being done to the Palestinians with the full backing of the deranged US.) Amusingly enough, it seems the biggest rap that Jews have against White America is that some of their great grandparents weren’t admitted into elite Wasp golf clubs, that Ivy League universities once enforced quotas against Jewish applicants(who were still vastly over-represented in enrollment btw), and that not enough whites were sufficiently enthused about entering yet another World War — keep in mind that Americans lost more than 100,000 men in the last year of fighting in World War I — to save the Jews(but then, never mind Hitler would never have come to power if Jews hadn’t pushed communism & participated in the killing of millions, abused finance-capitalism to fleece so many Germans during the Great Depression, and promoted Weimar cultural degeneracy that alienated so many Germans and other Europeans). There were, to be sure, cases of anti-Jewish bullying in American schools, but more often than not, the thugs were either black or ethnic-whites(fellow immigrants who arrived alongside Jews), and if anything, it was the Anglo-American order that made it possible for Jews to appeal to some semblance of Rule of Law to get some justice.
Jews are utterly shameless. Even though they have NO history of tragedy & victim-hood in American History(and, if anything, worked alongside whites to destroy the native Americans and enslave blacks), they had the chutzpastic temerity to occupy the throne of Noble Victimhood in American Life, indeed to insist that Americans must atone for what happened to Jews in Germany during WWII. Therefore, we must praise all things Jewish and support the Zionist destruction of Palestine. Just like a cuckoo bird's hatchling pushes out the real offsprings from the nest, the bogus victim-hood of Jews have suppressed or marginalized the genuine victim-narratives of other groups who are infinitely more deserving of American Sympathy.
All in all, when we consider all the violence and brutality perpetrated by America in its short history, Jews CANNOT be considered one of its great victim groups or even a victim group of any kind. Sure, Jews got it in the neck under the Nazis, but Nazi Germany was NOT the US, and what other nations did or didn't do should not shape the moral narrative of Americans. (Should Americans suck up to Chinese-Americans because so many of their kind suffered horribly in the 20th century at the hands of the imperialists, especially the Japanese? As horrible as it was, what the Japanese did to the Chinese should NOT be part of the American Victim Mythology.) And this is why the US support of Zionism has always been morally shoddy, indeed downright fraudulent(and 'racist' considering that the US support of Israel as part of 'Western Civilization' connotes that WHITE Christians should support WHITE European-Jews over them brown Ay-rabs). Americans didn't owe Jews anything, and furthermore, it was the Palestinians who were being wronged by the Jewish immigrant-invaders who were poised to take over and replace the existing population. It’s as if the US made amends for a people to whom it owed nothing. (If anything, Jews owed a tremendous deal to Anglo-America that made Jewish success possible.) Now, given what Germans did to the Jews, it might have made some sense to hand over a chunk of Germany for a Jewish State. After all, Poles got a huge chunk of Germany(as compensation and to make up for losses of territory in the East to the USSR). It was the Germans who did it, not the US. Also, Palestinians had nothing to do with World War II, let alone the Shoah. It had nothing to do with World War I and the rise of communism and Fascism that laid the grounds for another world war. And yet, not only did the US behave as if it owed something to Jews but carried out its 'obligation' by helping the Jews take land from Palestinians, a truly innocent people who had never done any wrong to Americans, none whatsoever. The sheer perversity & absurdity of American moralism when it comes to Jews is truly amazing.
Granted, Jews are expert hustlers and knew how to con the Wasps into granting special favors to Jews. Jews flattered Wasps that their Anglo creation, America, was so different from Old Europe that was all about tyranny and bigotry. Also, America, as a young country, hoped to gain instant pedigree of deep culture by embracing Jews, the most ancient of peoples. The youngest nation welcoming and being blessed by the oldest people. Surely, if a people as wise and spiritual as the Jews lent their blessing to Anglo-American, then the US must be something more than a nation of money and ideas; it must be a nation of roots, even if those roots came from elsewhere. (In a way, the whole appeal of Mormonism was to imagine ancient-ness in America that had none[unless we’re dealing with American Indians, but then they hardly had a civilization worthy of the title of deep history and ancient-ness; they were a bunch of half-naked savages romping around chasing after bisons]). Anglo-Americans knew it had been morally questionable to take the land from the natives and practice slavery on a massive scale. Then, it’s understandable why Wasps craved benediction from the Jews, a great people with deep roots. If Jews blessed the white man’s creation, wouldn’t it wash away a lot of sins? And then, following the Shoah when Jews were soon promoted as the most tragic of all peoples(and when ‘antisemitism’ became the most unpardonable ‘sin’), the Jewish Question turned into the Jewish Answer of both Liberal Wasps and Conservative Wasps doing a tug-of-war to win over the Holy Jews to their side. Such psycho-politico-morality complicated matters a great deal when it came to American righteousness. For example, are Americans supposed to feel ‘guilty’ about what happened to the Indians? If so, they should have been most sensitive toward the Palestinians who faced the similar threat of being robbed of their homeland by waves of immigrant-invaders. In some ways, Jews and Liberal Wasps pushed this line of reasoning, some even going so far as to compare the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians with the Shoah. And yet, there was also the idea that the US should admire and support Israel because Americans naturally identify with Jews as the cowboys who proved triumphant over the natives and built a rich modern nation from the little that had been there.
One thing for sure, American Indians were indeed a real ‘victim group’ at the hands of whites. Jews were never a victim group in the US, and if anything, they often worked with whites in the Westward expansion and Southern Slavery. And, there was no reason whatsoever for the US to punish the Palestinians, a people who had never committed any wrong against the US or the West. But what’s truly perverse is that the US not only got sucked into the Jewish agenda & Zionist plot to wrong the Palestinians but willfully swallowed the moral crackpot cooked up by Jews that would have us believe that the creation of Israel was one of the greatest moral triumphs of world history. But why?
While I can understand Jewish sentimentality and myths about the Holy Land and how its recovery as the Jewish Homeland meant the world to them, what was so moral about it? Jews-as-dominant-majority hadn’t occupied that particular territory for thousands of years, and even when they held it in ancient times, it had almost as many non-Jews among the population who also had claims on the land. If every group dredged up ancient land claims and fought to retake what had been lost centuries or even millenniums ago, the world would blow up in World War III, IV, V, and etc. Whatever ancient claims Jews may have had, they had no clear moral claim on the land in modern times. Also, contrary to the bogus narrative, Jews could have obtained territory in some other part of the world to have a homeland. And if Americans(and Canadians) were so sympathetic to Jews and concerned about their well-being, especially after the horrors of World War II, they could have offered some empty piece of land(plenty in both US and Canada) to the Jews, especially because Israel was bound to be surrounded by none-too-friendly Arab/Muslim nations. And yet, this most amoral or even immoral of historical events came to be so maniacally moralized in US politics, media, culture, and spiritual life. It has so much to do with who/whom. Once Jews were elevated to holy status(and had so much money to throw around), they were like ‘made men’ with the Midas touch that turned even their worst crimes into something noble and worthy. Who else and why else could the Jews have gotten away with something as brazen as the USS Liberty Attack?
Agreat lie is like a cancer, especially if it involves a people with great power. Jews have great power, and its legitimacy in America(that rules the world) is based on a vile and perverse lie. Now, Zionism per se isn’t absurd or particularly perverse. The Jewish nationalist desire for a homeland of their own was perfectly understandable, and the Jewish attachment to the Holy Land involved real historical and cultural roots. What is perverse is why Jewish identity, Jewish matters, Jewish themes, and Zionism became so central to America, a nation that is only 2% Jewish and one that never committed a grave wrong against the Jewish people(whereas one can argue that the US has much to answer for in relation to many other peoples; consider the tragedies caused by US meddling in Latin America, Asia, and the Arab World). If the US had done something to remove Jews who had already been living in the Holy Land and replaced them with Arabs, one could see why US support of Zionism could have been a moral imperative, one that would right the wrong done to Jews. But Jewish-European immigration to Palestine only began in the late 19th century and gathered pace in the 20th century. US did nothing to take the Holy Land away from Jews, and Palestinians had been on the land for as far as they could remember. So, there was no moral reason for the US to intervene in that region for the sake of Jews at the expense of another people. It fails as Moralpolitik or Idealpolitik.
But, what is truly perverse is it even fails as Realpolitik as the US gained no geopolitical advantage by favoring the Zionists and alienating so much of the Arab-Muslim World that would likely have been friendly to the US if not for the issue of Zionism, Nakba, and Israel. If anything, Israel has been a thorn on the side of US foreign policy. So, what was it all for? US had no moral reasons to destroy Palestine and favor the Jews. And it gained no political advantage in the region by pissing off all those Arabs. Even for those who insist that the Iraq War was the biggest foreign policy blunder/disaster for the US, would it have happened if not for the creation of Israel and Jewish takeover of the US? Would Jews(who came to be so powerful in the US) have pushed for aggressive policies in the Middle East if not for the existence of Israel? The ONLY reason why Jews have been adamant about America’s aggressive role in the Middle East and North Africa has been over "Is it good for Israel?" Then, if no Israel, almost certainly no Gulf War, no 9/11, and no Iraq War, not to mention Libyan War, Syrian War, and etc. Even much of the rise of modern terrorism can be traced back to Zionism. Not only were Jewish terrorists pioneers in the field of modern violence but the trauma of Zionist victory over Arabs led so many Muslims to a life of radicalism and terrorism, albeit often manipulated and steered by the US, Israel, and Saudis against secular modernizing Arab/Muslim nations.
Even the one Realpolitik rationale that would justify US support of Zionism has turned out to be a total failure. It goes as follows: As Jews are naturally smarter and destined to rise to the top in the Liberal Democratic West following World War II, white people must be extra-nice to the Jewish community so that, one day, when Jewish power rules the world, the Jews will remember the kindness of whites and treat them accordingly. Then, even if the US support of Zionist destruction of Palestine was a geopolitical disaster and a great moral failure, at the very least whites would have powerful and grateful Jews on their side. Well, it sure didn’t turn out that way. It was all wishful thinking based on misconception of Jewish attitudes and underestimation of Jewish hatred & resentments. What whites might have regarded as generosity and magnanimity on their part, Jews saw only weakness, stupidity, naivete, and delusion. Jews don’t respect dummies, and white people acted really dumb. And now, Jews are pushing for White Nakba in targeting all of the West as one big West Bank. If Jews themselves took over Palestine and West Bank, Jews intend to use countless hordes of Asians, Africans, Hindus, and browns as their proxy demographic armies to inundate Europe, Australia, Canada, and the US.
Why would Jews do something so awful when they have it so good in the White West and when white people have come to treat them with such kindness? It's because Jewish revenge knows no bounds. Also, Jewish supremacist paranoia feels that Jewish bad behavior — deep down inside, Jews know they act badly and madly toward goyim — will eventually piss off whites once again, and this will lead to the great white backlash. Therefore, Jews must diversify the West as possible so that they can exploit Diversity to set one group of goyim against others in the cunning game of ‘divide and rule’. (If Jews were to better police and purge the bad apples in their tribal barrel, they could avoid future 'antisemitism', but Jews mostly do not for three reasons. Bad Jews often make the most fortunes for the Jewish community as lack of scruples + high intelligence is formula for fast riches. Jewish self-criticism might be seen as a vulnerability and inspire 'Anti-Semites' to go on the offensive; Jews hate playing defense and see offense as the best defense, and that means never airing dirty laundry unless they really have to, as with the cases of Bernie Madoff and Jeffrey Epstein. Jews have a dual morality when it comes to goyim. What isn't permissible among their own kind is perfectly permissible when dealing with filthy goyim.) Also, via race-mixing, especially between white women and black men, Jews seek to castrate white manhood into cuckery and set the white race against one another. Notice how Jews use feminism, youth culture, and ideology to set whites against whites: Women against men, youth against elders, ‘progressives’ against ‘conservatives’, North against South, and etc.
As what the Jews are doing is so obvious, why can’t we speak the truth? Why is our political and media culture so warped and downright surreal in its inability to look truth straight in the eye and say it like it is? 'Truthophobia' has something to do with the bargain that America struck with Jews, a most devious and dishonest people who have nevertheless put themselves forth as the conscience of America, the West, the World, the cosmos, and even god himself. Long long ago in ancient times, the powerful Jewish personality projected itself onto the universe and created a deity. It was a brazen act of chutzpah, but the saving grace was that in bowing down before this cosmic force, Jews believed there was something greater than any single Jew. But ever since Jews dumped God, each big-shot Jew thinks that he knows everything about everything. Like the Jewish porn-meister Ron Jeremy, he sucks his own dick.
America has never been a stranger to lies(like any civilization), but the lies surrounding Jews and Zionism defy all logic and sense of limits. The degree to which America has come to debase itself before Jews is on the DUCK SOUP level of what happens in Freedonia under the zany-tyranny of the Marx Brothers. Extraterrestrial creatures observing America from another planet might see it as one big comedy — like the ridiculous inner-workings of foreign tyrannies seem amusing to us — , but those who live in America/West must carry on with the conceit that Jews know best and what is best for all of us. They are gods, we are mortals; or they are adults, we are children; or they are shepherds and we are the sheep, or at best, dogs.
America has truly lost its mind and soul in sucking up to Jews. Bending to the Jewish Radical Will on the Zionist agenda set the template for all the appeasements to come, all in the increasingly ridiculous and pathetic hope/delusion that if the Wasps do one more favor for the Jews, the latter will come around to being nice and appreciative. A nation that becomes accustomed to one grand lunacy will weakly accommodate itself to more and more. If Jews could convince America to support the Zionist destruction of Palestine, it was only a matter of time before Jews could also persuade Americans to replace Christianity with Queertianity and replace White Americans with masses of non-white foreigners. Connect the dots of the cancer of lunacy, and the American acceptance of Nakba led eventually to American embrace of White Nakba.
When it comes to kindliness, one must always keep in mind the matter of who/whom. You must know whom you’re being kind to. If you are kind to a decent person, he is appreciative and reciprocates in kind. If you are kind to a vain egotist(so common among Jews, homos, and Negroes), he or she demands more and more as he or she regards you as a weakling, sucker, toady, cucky-wuck, peon, or servant. Wasps who sucked up to Jews were like all those ‘beta-male orbiters’ who think that some internet ‘thot’ will appreciate their affections(and money) when, in fact, the self-absorbed diva-minded ‘bitchass ho’ only cares about her self-aggrandizement.
At this point, it’s possible that many Wasps have realized the true nature of the Jew, but it’s now too late to change course. As Jews have so much power and can destroy anyone AND as the wasp cucks have invested so much into sucking-up-to-Jews-as-the-highest-virtue, the culture of servility is now inescapable and a protective shield from admitting shamefacedly that Liberal Wasps been wrong all along(and that the so-called ‘Anti-Semites’ had been more right than wrong on the subject of Jews).
A demented lie is like a cancer, and it grows and grows. Then, it’s possible that so much of craziness in politics and culture that we see all around has at least some origin or inspiration in the great lie behind America’s support of Zionism. The US did something so unnecessary and immoral but then decided to convince itself that there has never been anything so compelling, obligatory, ennobling, and important than going out of its way to support Jewish nationalism that soon turned into Jewish imperialism that now festers as out-of-control Jewish supremacy that has the gall to accuse whites who want OUT of the Jewish Empire as ‘white supremacist’. Lies do harm, and great lies do great harm.
And because the US decided on the Great Lie, it is now being punished. America, which persuaded itself that the Great Replacement via Nakba Pogroms(that wiped Palestine off the map) were most necessary and justifiable, now face the same fate as the West is being inundated with masses of non-white invaders(orchestrated mainly by Jewish globalist power). It is a kind of 'historical justice' because whites in America and Europe aided and abetted Jewish Imperialists in the destruction of the Palestinians who had done absolutely NO WRONG to the white race around the world.
Are whites being punished by the moral force of history? No, history is actually most amoral and doesn’t punish people according to right and wrong. So many bad people have triumphed and so many good people met horrible ends all throughout history. History is a concept in our head and lacks autonomous will. People make history and create events that either reward or punish other peoples. As Jews have the power, they've decided to reward themselves while punishing the whites. That’s how ‘justice’ works in history. The Power decides. It's like the Jewish doctor in Woody Allen's CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS gets away with murder and remains a respected member of the community because he was cold enough to see it through and cunning enough to cover his tracks. If there is a God, the man will be punished, but absent such a Power, justice on Earth is a matter of who gets to play gangster or judge.
If history itself had the power of judgment, both whites and Jews would be punished for what they did to the Palestinians. But only whites are punished while Jews are hailed to high heaven for all the vile things they continue to do to Palestinians. In a way, a greater crime(by whites) than enabling the Zionist destruction of Palestine was the willful blinding of themselves to the danger posed by Jews. The Wasp elites that caved to Jewish demands in the years following World War II sowed the demon seeds that would sprout and poison the air & soil. Wasp elites have much to answer for. Before they became the cuck-collaborators of Jews and pushed for the Great Replacement of white people by non-whites, they shamefully subjected themselves to the Great Elite Replacement whereby they relinquished their power and authority to the Jews. And having no pride, will, and drive left, these deracinated and pathetic Wasp elites just became intellectual and ideological putty in the hands of Jews. So, if Jews say ‘gay is good’, all these Episcopalians are so sure that nothing is as urgent as festooning churches with ‘gay’ colors. Wasps are now closer to dogs than humans. Not only did Wasps wrong a most innocent people in the Palestinians(and feel no remorse over it) but they empowered a most vile and venal people in the Jews. Imagine a man who aids an venomous snake to eat a harmless rabbit as the moral peak of his life. He would be crazy, and likewise, the US has gone crazy in supporting vile Jewish power against Palestinians, a people of no power and no bad deeds done to whites in America or Europe. And yet, all we hear from American Politicians is "Israel is our closest ally", "Israel is our best friend", and etc.
Now, given Jewish talent in more-or-less meritocratic America, it would have been difficult for Wasps to permanently forestall the rise of Jews. Still, Wasps could have created responsible methods and sensible organs to critique the emerging Jewish Power. Even if another people are destined to supplant you, you can find ways to criticize and check their power. Wasps could have created means to do to Jewish Elite Power what the Jews had done to Wasp Elite Power when Anglo-Americans were supreme in the halls of power. But in the end, both Wasp Liberals and Wasp Conservatives fell all over each other to suck up to Jews and win their favors. Thus, Jewish Power kept growing without any push-back or counter-balance. As the educated Wasps utterly failed on checking Jewish power, most white hoi polloi(who looked up to white elites for answers) never understood what really happened in America resulting from the power transference from Wasps to Jews. With respectable Wasps refusing to scrutinize the Jews, the task fell to white radicals, sometimes of neo-nazi bent that only created the impression that one had to be a hateful Hitler-loving nutcase to find any fault with the Jews.
