Libertarianism vs Nationalism. Nationalism is the Answer. / Proglodytes as Demon-Possessed. Talk to the Devil, not to its Minions

http://www.vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-collapse-of-trumpism-on-war-and-immigration

Donald Trump's supporters are becoming disillusioned with Zionist-Globalist War Cries emanating from Washington D.C. Whatever happened to nationalism over globalism? Whatever happened to no more wars and instead focusing on the problems facing the American people?

It goes to show that a people cannot rely on just one man.

It's like Moses led his people out of Egypt, but the Hebrews couldn't rely only on his leadership and vision. After all, even great men fade, fall, or die eventually. So, Moses had to provide his people with the Law, the vessel of principles and meaning. That way, with or without him, the Hebrews had something to guide them and set them straight through the ages.

Likewise, white people need something more than Donald Trump or Vladimir Putin. Putin won't live forever, and Trump has shown himself to be a huckster and opportunist. He's not to be trusted. Also, Jewish Power is so entrenched in the US that it's difficult for Trump to outmaneuver the Jews even if he wanted to. In contrast, Russia was such an anything-goes anarcho-gangster state in the 90s that someone like Putin with deep state instincts and connections could pull off a counter-coup against the Jewish oligarchs.

Anyway, white people need a sense of who they are, what they are, where they came from, and how they must advance into the future. Trump was useful in shaking things up, but he has to deal with the reality of the Deep State and powerful institutions being controlled by Jews and/or globalists.

One thing for sure, white people need to reject libertarianism that has defined so much of 'conservative' thought. Consider soulless and spineless asses like Paul Ryan. While individualism and freedom are valuable, libertarianism goes too far in lionizing those themes above all else. It is the ideology of "I got mine, and I don't care about others, even or especially for those of my own race/ethnicity."
The problem isn't one's conviction in individuality, independence, responsibility, and personal success; it isn't one's criticism of those paying the price for poor decisions. After all, the kind of leftism that mindlessly fawns upon the poor and the 'powerless' is pretty useless. It has a knee-jerk tendency to see success as 'greed' and failure as 'nobility'. In fact, many people, especially in a free society, messed up in life due to poor/stupid decisions. And they must realize this and act more sensibly in life. To be free means to accept the consequences of one's freedom.

The important thing is there is a sensible middle-ground between Libertarianism and Socialism. Libertarianism is so radically self-centered that its adherents care only about their own success. Or, if unsuccessful themselves, they fawn on those with money and power with toady-like deference. Theirs is a worldview of arrogance and contempt. According to libertarianism, the winners must be great and wonderful since they used their smarts and freedom to rise high. Libertarianism tends to ignore how ability and success can easily lurch into corruption, abuses, and exploitation. It's like even naturally talented athletes will cheat by using steroids or dirty tricks. Lance Armstrong and Marion Jones.
Socialism, in contrast, is so sanctimonious in its righteous compassion that it fails to see the flaws and failings of groups deemed as 'victims'. So, lower classes are just saints with hearts of gold who, if they act crazy or violent, are merely reacting to oppression.
Blacks, refugees, and immigrants are automatically good for belonging to a 'marginalized' group. Such lack of critical mentality in socialism fails to come up with useful advice to the 'losers' of the world. By fawning on such peoples, socialism only encourages the 'victim' groups to feel sorry for themselves, self-righteous relative to the have-mores, and justified no matter how stupidly they act.

The Left has done itself no favors with this brand of socialism. It always gives useless or even destructive advice to people it purports to help because of its dogmatic sentimentality about the poor, the minorities, or the 'wretched of the earth'. So, if blacks riot and burn down a city, the Left just sees blacks as nobly enraged with injustice. So, if a bunch of Muslims leave their own nations and illegally barge into the West for material gain, they are to be coddled as the 'huddled masses yearning to breathe free' instead of as craven opportunists.
Imagine a parent who never straightens out his children but always makes excuses for them. Imagine a teacher who never accuses his students for bad behavior but only makes excuses for them, as if it's never the students' fault. There can be no progress, no improvement, and no rectitude with such attitude. This is why leftism has been such a catastrophe. The problem is not its concern for fellow man(who may be down and out) but the lack of courage to be critical of those in need of help. Even if a people are without privilege or advantage, they must be judged and corrected when they do wrong. It's like Moses sometimes had to be tough with his people even if they were a sorry desperate lot.

But libertarianism has its own problems. While it has some positive ideas like individuality, freedom, responsibility, and work ethic, it is obsessive about the self at the expense of all other considerations. In regard to humanity, it only sees single individual selves, not a people with common bonds of ethnicity, culture, history, and territory.
Libertarianism isn't wrong to espouse the ideal of individual success by individual effort. After all, no one should expect others to do his homework for him. Where libertarianism fails is the total unconcern for anything but the self(or the various individual selves). If the self has it good, a libertarian feels no compunction to care about anyone else. But with such unconcern, a libertarian cannot have a meaningful identity, culture, or sense of history.
He is just an atomized individual in a globo-cosmopolitan universe. Since he identifies only as an individual and sinks-or-swims as a mere individual, his heart and mind have no connection to anything beyond the self. As such, it cannot have a wider or deeper sense of community across time and space. Libertarianism sees lots of dots but never connects the dots to form a large picture.

Consider two individuals. One is a Libertarian Jew who is totally radical about his libertarian principles. The other is a Jewish nationalist. Now, suppose both individuals believe in individuality, responsibility, and ambition. Suppose both Jews gain success. In that regard, they have much in common.
However, the Libertarian Jew is only concerned with the individual, the self. He only cares about his individual freedom and success. And he considers rest of humanity ONLY AS INDIVIDUALS. So, he sees successful individuals, middling individuals, and failed-individuals. He has no other consideration of who-they-are when dealing with humanity.

In contrast, the other guy, the Jewish nationalist, has a sense of ethnic, historical, and cultural identity. He doesn't see himself merely as an individual but also as a person of a specific racial community. So, even though he also sees a world composed of successful individuals, middling individuals, and failed-individuals, he also sees a world made up of cultures and tribes. And he feels a unity with the people of his tribe/culture, the Jews of the world. So, even though, purely on the basis of economic and individual worth, he is more like rich Hindus, rich Anglos, and rich Chinese, he feels a deep connection with all other Jews, rich-middle-poor. And if possible, he would like to do something that serves the interests of all Jews on the racial, cultural, territorial, or historical level. Meanwhile, the Libertarian Jew feels no such feelings when it comes to other Jews. They are just individuals, and some are successful, and some are not.

Now, suppose there's a Jewish community in some part of the world and something horrible is happening to it. The Libertarian Jew's attitude is, "Why should I care?" Since he only sees himself as an individual among other individuals, why should he care MORE about what happens to some Jewish community than what happens to some other community? After all, bad things are happening all the time in some part of the world. Earthquake could destroy a community in Iran. Hurricane could destroy a community in Florida. Famine could destroy a community in Ethiopia. Flood could ruin a community in Japan.
So, why should the Libertarian Jew care more about what happens to a Jewish community? After all, his special concern for Jews would go against his own Libertarian principles.
It might be deemed 'racist', 'supremacist', and 'exclusive'. For him to care more about a tragedy befalling a Jewish community would mean his emotions are playing racial-favorites. It means he's thinking collectively and nationalistically than as an individual committed only to principles of colorblind freedom, liberty, and success. So, even though, in a broad sense, he might feel generic sympathy for any group facing hardship or horrors -- and donate to humanitarian charities for trouble-spots around the world -- , he doesn't feel an obligation to care more about suffering Jews than any other people. So, he sees suffering Jews only in a generic way. They are suffering like the rest of humanity that is suffering, and that's that. And there is no need for him to feel especially bad about the plight of his people. Indeed, he doesn't even regard them as 'my people'. So, even though there could be some Jews suffering really badly in some part of the world, he feels no special connection with or obligation toward them. As such, he feels just fine going about his daily business and is concentrating on persona/professional interests. So, if HE is rich and happy, all's fine with the world. His happiness isn't associated with what happens to a bunch of Jews halfway around the globe.

In contrast, the Jewish Nationalist feels as part of a larger ethno-humanity. No matter how well he may be doing, no matter how well-off he is personally and professionally, and no matter how safe & secure he and his family are, he doesn't feel happy or feel all's well with the world IF there are Jews suffering terribly in some part of the world. He sees them as a part of an extended family. So, their suffering is, at least partly, his suffering as well. He feels a connection to others of his kind. His life doesn't revolve around himself. His life revolves around something bigger and deeper, a sense of being part of a history and culture.



There's a scene in SANDS OF IWO JIMA where a soldier goes on break. He's supposed to return quickly and aid his company, but he prolongs his recess to take it easy. As the result, his fellow soldiers end up getting killed because of his absence. He is overcome with shame and guilt. His extended break proved negligent and led to the death of his compatriots.
The Jewish Nationalist feels in a similar way in relation to other Jews. He feels that all Jews should care about one another. This doesn't mean that some Jews should work so that others can freeload off them. Such dependence would be parasitic and opportunistic. Rather, his ideal is for a kind of ethno-INTERdependence whereby, despite every Jew's effort to gain success on his own, he would be mindful of what's happening with the worldwide Jewish community. So, if some Jews are seriously hurting in a part of the world, other Jews should feel obligated to do something, like when American Jews lent a hand to Soviet Jews. Such compassion may be tribal than universal, but universalism is too generic for meaningful emotions. After all, it's impossible for anyone to care about all the families around the world. Naturally, one cares more for one's own family. Trying to help or save all the peoples around the world would be impossible. Besides, universalists only pretend to care about other groups as for one's own. 20th century was filled with lots of horrors, but Jews have been fixated on the Shoah. Why? Would Jews have cared so much if it had been directed only at Polish Catholics and not Jews? It's only natural that Jews would care more about fellow Jews.

For a person to care ONLY ABOUT THE SELF AND CLOSE ONES would be petty. For a person to care for ALL OF HUMANITY would be generic, more a case of virtue-signaling than anything meaningful or consequential. The middle-ground for meaningful human emotions is ethno-culturalism. A Polish person shouldn't just care about the self or the individual. But it'd be impossible for him to care about all of humanity. Universalism will always be generic and confused.
The meaningful balance can be found in ethno-culturalism: A Pole who cares about Polish-ness as a people, culture, nation, and history. Let him defend and preserve Polish-ness, and let peoples of other nationalities defend and preserve their own identities and heritages.
It's like different departments in colleges focus on different things. Chemistry department focuses on chemistry, not on the law. Accounting Department focuses on accounting, not on agriculture or rocket science. It would be absurd to expect every academic department to focus on every discipline & every field of knowledge and welcome any student with any interest. Likewise, every nation has its own specialization in ethnicity, culture, territory, history, and mythology(collective narrative). Specialization allows the university to maintain the various departments. People of each department specialize in a certain field and maintain expertise in it. So, those in psychology maintain knowledge about psychology, and those in film studies maintain knowledge on the art of cinema. We don't condemn such specialization as 'academic tribalism' or 'academic exclusionism'. In order for every department to be expert in its specialty, it has to concentrate on certain kinds of knowledge at the expense/exclusion of other kinds. So, if a department is about teaching foreign languages, it would be stupid for it to include physics and finance as well in the name of 'academic inclusion'.

Likewise, each nation has its own special history. And each nation is stamped by a unique story of a dominant ethnic group. And each nation has a rich history, culture, folklore, and tradition. It is up to the people of each nation to safeguard, preserve, defend, and disseminate this specialized body of national-cultural knowledge among all its members. Each person of a nation must be seen as a student & scholar of its ethnicity, history, culture, and territory.
Just like everyone in a college department must gain expert knowledge of the department's subject, every person of a nation should try to be an expert on that nation's history, culture, arts, geography, and etc.
It is the loss of such mindset under the pressures of globalism that has made so many people into such bad students of their own identity, history, and culture. It is no wonder they are flunking in national survival and self-preservation. Poisoned by globalism that says every nation must inclusively accept ALL nationalities across its borders, people are no longer compelled to become knowledgeable patriots of their ethnicity, history, and culture with the will to defend their territory.

Imagine if the French language department was accused of specializing in French and not welcoming other disciplines. Therefore, suppose the French department declares itself as no longer exclusively about French and allows people from engineering, agriculture, ceramics, photography, law, medicine, and etc into the department. So, what would the French department be about now? It'd be deemed 'nativist' or 'racist' for the department to be about French above other disciplines. But the people in the department only know French, and they know nothing of other disciplines. And people who specialize in other disciplines feel lost wandering around the French department which is ill-equipped to serve their interests. In time, every discipline that's been allowed into the French department suffers since no one is allowed to meaningfully concentrate on anything. Only by everyone returning to his own department and only by French department concentrating on French will all departments flourish.

Likewise, all nations have more to gain by maintaining their own peoples, cultures, histories, and territories. Let the French preserve what is French in France. Let Cameroonians preserve what is Cameroonian in Cameroon, and let Algerians preserve what is Algerian in Algeria. Let different peoples specialize in their own ethnicity, territory, history, and narrative. And once each nation is preserved in such manner, the world can share and exchange each other's ideas, stories, achievements, and etc... just like various departments in colleges can share their general knowledge with other departments that specialize in their own disciplines. For there to be interdisciplinary studies across departments, each department must maintain expertise in its special field. That way, if another department needs help from the French Department, the latter will be all revved up to deliver.

We need a robust nationalism that encourages each person to be an expert in his folk, history, and culture of his/her nation. And it should be seen as a lifelong pursuit than something only learned in schools. A person with no such interest or investment should be seen as a flunk. What's the point of being a member of a nation if one has no interest in it? It'd be like being part of college department without having any knowledge of its subject.

Anyway, a nationalist doesn't only care about himself or look upon humanity as a collection of 'free individuals' in a borderless world. That would be a libertarian. A nationalist believes that certain peoples, histories, and territories became interwoven to form special 'cultures' that need to be preserved, ideally by those with blood ties to the cultures. Surely, a black African feels a deeper connection when he looks upon the artifacts of his culture. While anyone can appreciate African art on the aesthetic level, it is more than mere art to those of the race and culture that created it. Similarly, Chinese culture surely means more to people of Chinese lineage. It's like Jewish things in Jerusalem mean more to a Jew than to a Japanese, for whom the gardens of Kyoto have special meaning.

Globalism wages war on the specialization of cultures, histories, and peoples. It tries to turn all cultures into Cultures-for-Dummies: bland, generic, superficial, interchangeable. Globalism tries to turn every nation into Nation-for-Dummies.
In contrast, nationalism believes that each person should become an expert of one's identity, history, and culture. Also, if the people of the culture fail in this, they mustn't expect any other people to do it for them. If Hungarians give up on Hungary, non-Hungarians will not fill the void? If Hungarians decide to abandon their culture, who will preserve it for them? Africans? Mexicans? Japanese? Brazilians? No chance.
And even if another people did decide to preserve it for Hungarians, it still wouldn't be the same. It'd be like Chinese preserving the Kenyan nation, or Nigerians speaking Polish and pretending to be Polish Catholics. It'd be just 'larping'. If Jews gave up on Jewish identity and culture AND if Hawaiians or Gypsies took up the mantle of Jewishness, would it be the same? Of course not. No more than if Vietnamese took over Congo and pretended to be New Congolese.

For a nationalist, the meaning of freedom and justice cannot derive solely from personal well-being. No matter how free and well-off he may be as an individual, he doesn't feel truly free and secure as long as others of his kind are suffering or living in bondage. He feels a 'psychic' connection with others of his own kind. It's like a father cannot enjoy his meal no matter how much food he is served if he knows his own children are going hungry. It's like a son cannot enjoy his meal no matter how much food he is served if he knows his parents are starving. A nationalist sees his people as part of his larger family.

A libertarian has no special feeling for others of his own kind. He only cares about himself and has a generic sense of humanity as individuals. So, if people of his ethnicity are suffering, he doesn't see them as 'my people'. He just sees them as suffering individuals no different from other suffering individuals in some other part of the world. A true-blue Libertarian Jew would be no more disturbed by Jews being rounded up and killed than by any other people being rounded up and killed. He would be appalled but no more appalled than by violence committed to any other group.

Of course, few Jews actually feel that way. Jews, even those who claim to be libertarian, feel a great deal of tribal camaraderie with other Jews around the world. Jews know this feeling is the source of their power, resilience, unity, and will to survive.
Now, it'd be nice if Jews, in valuing the meaningfulness of such tribalism, respected similar feelings among other peoples. But Jews won't tolerate such among whites because white gentiles with a sense of tribal compassion may favor their own kind's interests overJewish interests. After all, if white gentiles felt special compassion & loyalty to their own kind, they'd be less partial to sacrificing their own interests in favor of Jewish ones. In some cases, they might see Jewish interests as threatening to their own and work against them. And this is why Jews will not tolerate tribal-communion compassion among white gentiles. (This is why Jews use three methods to make sure whites serve Jewish interests uber alles. First, Jews try to persuade whites that Jewish/Israeli interests and American/European interests are one and the same. So, what is good for Israel is good for the US, no ifs and buts about it. And Western Values are synonymous with Jewish values. Second, Jews tell whites that nationalism is passe, and therefore, whites must adopt Universal Values. Oddly enough, however, once whites are made to forgo white identity in favor of universalism, Jews steer whites toward to serving Zionism and Jews above all else. In other words, it's a case of 'heads I win, tails you lose'. When Jews say people must surrender nationalism for universalism, it doesn't apply to Jews who are, if anything, celebrated for clinging to their nationalism. Also, 'universalism' is a sham because deracinated and de-nationalized whites are then steered to serve specific Jewish interests than truly universal ones. To be sure, Jews mask their tribal interests with faux-principles about 'human rights', 'war on terror', and 'liberal democracy', but just about everything Jews push under such labels goes toward serving Jewish or Zionist interests. Third, Jews not only advise whites to adopt universalism but go all out to smear even the faintest whiff of white identity as 'nazi' or 'white supremacism'. Therefore, whites are made an offer they can't refuse. They must reject nationalism in favor of 'universalism' that, however, is configured only to serve Jewish tribal interests and Zionism. The current trouble with Russia and Syria has everything to do with Jewish obsessions and nothing else, at least from the standpoint of the US.) If Jews are killed by Palestinians, Jews care a great deal about Jewish victims. Indeed, they use the media to make even gentiles care for Jewish victims. But whites are not supposed to feel any kind of racial compassion for their own kind.

So, there's hardly been ANY expression of sympathy or alarm about all those whites who've been brutally robbed, raped, and/or murdered in South Africa. And Germans are not supposed to care about German victims of migrant rapists. French are not supposed to care about French victims of Muslim violence or African thuggery. And in the US, whites are never allowed to express racial camaraderie with fellow whites attacked by blacks or overrun by non-white immigrants. Ethno-Compassion has been stamped out for whites... but whites are pressured to feel compassion for Jews(every crisis is a new holocaust), blacks(black lives matter), homos, and immigrants, even illegal ones("we have to keep families together"). But when it comes to white identity and interests? Forget about it. If anything, non-whites are encouraged to insult whiteness(despite their desire to move to and live in white nations), and even many whites have been mentally-colonized to spit on their own identity and history. Whites are only allowed, indeed compelled, to feel racial compassion for other groups, especially Jews, blacks, and homos.

This must all change.

-----------------------

Dealing with Proglodytes, it's best not to approach them as individuals with critical faculty and agency of thought. It's best to see them as mind-infected, psycolonized, or 'possessed'.

Demon-possessed Regan in THE EXORCIST was no longer herself. She was taken over by the Devil. It would have made no sense for the priests to address her as a free-thinking, independent, and autonomous person. Her young impressionable mind was taken over by Satanic spirits.



Progs are possessed by some demonic GLOB spirit. And it is that demon-spirit in them that we must address. We must focus on the Soros-bug inside their minds that is doing the 'thinking' and talking for them. We must bypass them-as-individuals and get to the source of the malaise.
Progs are mere carriers of this disease. Notice how they all sound and act alike. It's as if they all caught the same Flu. It's the Globonic Plague. When a doctor treats a patient for a disease, he focuses on the infection or condition, not on the patient per se. It is the disease that has hold on the patient, not the patient who has hold on the disease. These ideological infections create the illusion among the afflicted that they freely and personally chose those 'ideas' & 'values' when, far more likely, they became infected or 'possessed' by them.
Granted, the afflicted might have done things that aided and abetted the likelihood of the infection. If a person situates himself in an area where lots of people have come down with the flu, he has a good chance of catching it himself. Still, once the person has caught the flu, it is the disease that must be addressed, not the person as he no longer has control over the disease that has a 'logic' and 'will' of its own.

Proglodytes are zombie-like minions... just like Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution were infected with Mao-itis. It would have made no sense to treat every Little-Red-Book-toting-and-quoting Red Guard as an independent thinker with free will. Their minds were infected with the same ideo-disease. Once Mao-itis ran its course and passed away, it was amazing how everyone lost the fever at the same time and the same way.

Now, the GLOB is tricky and deceptive in hoodwinking its minions into believing they are made free, liberated, independent, and empowered by casting off the core tenets of morality, integrity, responsibility, sobriety, and normality. But once young ones reject such virtues as 'reactionary', they are left with a void that, desperately hungry for meaning, fills up with every fad or fashion that comes down the pipeline. Young ones fail to understand that core virtues are the immunity against being infected by various fads concocted by the cynical GLOB or radicals(or fadicals) who are infected themselves. Now, there are degrees of infections. Some proglodytes may eventually emerge from the infection and regain sanity. But some have caught the viral rabies or leprosy version of the disease, and for them, it's total madness or slow decay.

How Globalists Hate Nationalism and Do Everything to Destroy It(except for Israel and Jewish Tribal Consciousness) but Shamelessly Invoke Nationalism to Rouse up the Populace against whatever They Hate

The above video is very telling about the Way of the World. It’s about how the Swedish elites in government, media, and education invoke Swedish Nationalism against the alleged Russian Threat. Now, one might say it’s reasonable for the political leaders and media elites of a nation to alert their people about foreign dangers. But this is Sweden we are talking about, a nation where the general policy is that there is no such thing as a Swedish people and culture. Accordingly, Sweden should go the way of America(as ‘reinvented’ by Jews) that supposedly has no core demography, core culture, core history. Indeed, Jews would have us believe that America doesn’t even have a core territory as all the world may illegally enter the US and demand to be accepted as ‘undocumented immigrants’ deserving to be called ‘Americans’. And of course, just as the world can invade the US demographically, the big institutions and industries of the US are supposed to have the license to invade, dominate, and control all the world. Sweden used to be a nice little nation, but it caught the globalist bug. It decided to become a Moral Superpower by sending tons of aid to Africa and taking in more ‘refugees’ and ‘migrants’ than any other nation, at least proportionately speaking. Sweden wasn't enough for the Swedish. Perhaps, things were too orderly, too quiet, and too civil. In other words, too boring. So, the Swedes decided to save Africa or have Africa come to Sweden and become New Swedes to spice things up a bit in frozen Scandinavia. Supposedly, the soulless Ice People need to be thawed and warmed by the Sun People. And Swedish women see most of the heat in the friction of the meat of white poon and black pud. Sweden, like Holland, dreams of Junglopolis.

Given the rise of New Sweden mentality, the elites have been telling the Swedish people that they can’t claim whatever that may be construed as uniquely Swedish. No one has any right to say he’s Swedish by blood, history, and culture. Anyone can be Swedish by coming to Sweden, and if any Swede says that foreigners cannot be real Swedes, he is a thought criminal to be fined and even imprisoned. If the state doesn’t get him, other Swedes will. As Swedes tend to be orderly, earnest, trusting, conformist, and group-conscientious, they readily soak up whatever globalist nonsense they are taught in schools and get from the media. Thus, almost overnight, they became like the Pod People of INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS and expect every Swede to think and speak the same way. Those who deviate from the Agenda and Narrative are shunned, hounded, and condemned. As Swedes are a cohesive and group-oriented people, they are super-sensitive to disapproval from their peers. So, even those who remain skeptical of the New Sweden Narrative just hunker down and go along lest they be targeted as renegades.
Anyway, since the official narrative says there is no Core Swedishness in territory, history, or people, anyone can become Swedish just by coming to Sweden. An African fresh off the boat with no ancestry or history in Sweden is put on fast-track to becoming Swedish and, soon enough, he is to be regarded as just as 'Swedish' as the real Swedish with ancient roots in the territory. (If Swedes really want to play this ‘white guilt’ BS, they should remember that their main acts of terror were carried out against fellow whites. Today, Swedish are like PC vikings who do everything to shame and castrate all Europeans.) A Swedish child is told there is no real man or real woman. Any man can become a woman, any woman can become a man. Indeed, boys who claim to be girls and girls who claim to be boys are favored over boys who know they are boys and girls who know they are girls. If any bunch of boys can be girls if they say so, then any bunch of Africans and Middle Eastern Muslims can become Swedes if they say so. Swedishness is treated as a mere accident of history: There is nothing there there. A bunch of people happened to build a society in a land that is now known as Sweden. So, Swedish identity is accidental, arbitrary, and trivial. It doesn’t mean anything. Also, Swedish can’t be said to have a culture because Christianity, Classical Art, and much else came from outside Sweden. (Of course, we can argue that a people, in practicing a foreign influence in their own way, make it their own. For example, even though Christianity didn’t originate in Europe, the European practice and development of Christianity was different from the direction and character of Christianity in the Near East and North Africa. Opera began in Italy, but German Wagner took it to new heights. Buddhism didn’t originate in Tibet or Japan, but each people did their special thing with the religion, and thus, Japanese Buddhism is distinctly Japanese, and Tibetan Buddhism is distinctly Tibetan.)

Anyway, it’s pretty well-known among European patriots that Sweden is an example of PC-gone-wild. This is ironic because Swedes are a conscientious people. Being a good, sincere, and mindful people, they want to do the right thing. They want to be useful members of the community and be approved as Good and Worthy. Also, having abandoned religion, Swedes have come to worship secular gods, and they turned out to be Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Sweden is rich but a peripheral nation in terms of world influence. So, most Swedes get their information and ideas from elsewhere, and guess who controls world academia and media? Jews of course. Jewish Power made Holocaustianity the new religion of the West and made White Identity and Consciousness into the new Satan. Anything that is pro-white and white-conscious is ‘Nazi’ and the road to another Holocaust. Ridiculous, but Swedes found religion in Jew-Worship. Having come to see Jews as a holy race, Swedes earnestly and sincerely partook of Jewish advice as if it was manna from heaven. Jews not only promote themselves but Homos and Blacks. Jews value Homos as minority-elite allies, and Jews find blacks useful in destroying white manhood and in turning white women into ‘mudsharks’. Jews know that the unity of white man and white woman is the strongest source of white power. Jews know that white women will abandon white men if the latter are seen as weak and wussy, and it just so happens that NOTHING in the world is as effective in destroying white manhood as blacks are. As blacks got harder muscles, louder voices, and bigger dongs, white males are beaten to a pulp and reduced to pathetic cucks. Thus, white women come to feel contempt for wussy white men and go with Negroes, and thus Sweden is being turned into something like Africa, just like France that also worships Jews, Negroes, and Homos. To anyone with sense, Jewish hag Barbara Specter is a disgusting phony and liar, BUT so many Swedes fell for the BS of people like her because they came to worship Holocaustianity and came to view Jews as a holy race. Given Jewish Sacredness, it would be Nazi-like to harbor any skepticism of claims made by Jews. Specter's idea that ‘Europe will not survive’ unless is it repopulated with non-Europeans(as New Europeans?) is downright absurd, but look how Swedes pay rapt attention to her as if they’re in the presence of the divine. It goes to show that intelligence isn’t enough. Swedes are an intelligent people, but their personality is earnest, trusting, and good-willed. If intelligence equals criticality on the individual level, East Asia should have been the most critical-minded place on Earth. But given the East Asian personality, higher intelligence just led to more conformism, dogmatism, and authoritarianism. Also, intelligence doesn’t necessarily lead to more truth or honesty. Take Jews, for instance. Ashkenazi Jews are said to be among the smartest, if not the smartest, people on Earth, but so many of them are so dishonest and pathological. Jewish neurosis makes it difficult for many Jews to use their intelligence in the service of integrity and truth.


Anyway, there is Sweden that is now post-national and even anti-national. As Swedish academics and media people cannot think for themselves but rely on the Bigger World(dominated by the US that is controlled by Jews), the current Swedish Zeitgeist follows the New American Way. While European nations often take pride in being Anti-American(as Americans are seen as crude, vulgar, stupid, and childish), the fact is even their Anti-Americanism serves the New American Way. Europeans trying to be anti-American is like Conservatives trying to be ‘anti-Liberal’. Instead of attacking the very premise of Liberalism, Republicans argue along the lines of "Liberals are the real racists." In other words, instead of questioning the core tenets of Liberalism, Conservatives make the argument that they are more committed to core Liberal Principles. Europeans and Canadians practice anti-Americanism in a similar way. In some ways, they resent the bigger, richer, and more powerful USA. Since they cannot compete with the US in the area of economics, technology, and military, they want to seem BETTER than Americans in areas such as values, culture, and attitudes. But because so much of Canadian and EU media & academia have been influenced or purchased by Jews-in-America, the Idea of the Good among Canadians and Europeans are essentially along the lines of Jewish-American Agenda. Therefore, their brand of Anti-Americanism can only be "We are actually more committed to the American Proposition(as formulated by Jews) than Americans are." So, Europeans and Canadians, instead of identifying and defending what are uniquely theirs in terms of ethnicity, history, and territory, go all out to show the Bad Old Americans that they, Europeans and Canadians, are even more committed to Jew-Worship, Homo-worship, Negro-worship, Diversity-worship, and Mass-Invasion-worship than the US is. Indeed, Jews have a kind of Hydra-like hold over the world. Because Jews control so much of the information, news, narrative, and iconography, even apparently opposing sides all end up, one way or another, supporting The Globo-Agenda. Thus, Americanism and Anti-Americanism are merely two heads of the Jewish Hydra monster. It’s like the GOP and Democratic Party often bicker with one another, but at the end of the day, both parties push for policies that come to favor Jewish supremacist interests. Sweden and Canada’s idea of being Anti-American is not trying to avoid the problems of America caused by Jewish venality, black thuggery, homo degeneracy, and excessive Diversity. Instead, their idea of Anti-Americanism is to show that they are ‘more evolved’ by being even more pro-black, pro-Jewish, pro-homo, pro-Diversity, and etc. Thus for Jews, it’s "heads I win, tails you lose". Jews win with both Americanism and Anti-Americanism as both are about "We worship Jews, blacks, homos, and Diversity." Europeans’ main gripe with the US is not that it’s too far cucked but not cucked enough in the war on ‘racism’, ‘xenophobia’, ‘homophobia’, and etc. As Jews control the cues and hues of ‘right and wrong’, they control all sides of the debate. The world doesn’t debate "Diversity is good" versus "Diversity is bad". It debates "Diversity is holy and we are more diverse than you" versus "No, Diversity is super-holy, and WE are more diverse than you." Jews put Diversity out there as something to worship, and all the feeble-brained idiots around the world just swallowed the bait without really asking WHY Diversity is good. Hasn’t Diversity mainly been the product of invasion and imperialism? Because the world is filled with idiots, we have people claiming to be anti-imperialist but promoting Diversity, the main product of imperialism.


Anyway, never expect any kind of consistency or principles from the GLOB, aka forces of globalism. Even though the Jewish population of Sweden is tiny, Jews hold tremendous sway over Sweden for two reasons. Much of Swedish media are owned by Jewish networks. Of course we are not supposed to notice Jewish power. Consider this article: https://www.jta.org/2016/10/07/news-opinion/world/swedish-lawmaker-rapped-for-decrying-jewish-familys-control-of-media It doesn’t matter than a Swedish lawmaker told the truth — a Jewish Bonnier family controls so much of Swedish media — and that her proposal was a call for more fairness and justice in news and media — "No family, ethnic group or company should be allowed to control more than 5 percent of the media” market". She was denounced as a ‘racist’ and ‘anti-Semite’ because she noticed that Jews have so much power in a nation in which they make up a trifling minority. Now, Jews endlessly complain about how whites have too much ‘white privilege’ EVEN IN nations founded and built by whites — indeed, Jews especially love to incite non-white minorities into denouncing whites for being ‘over-represented’ in professions and power in their own white nations — , but Jews and their cuck-puppets freak out when a patriotic Swede notes that the tiny Jewish minority in Sweden owns much of the national media. This is a clear demonstration that Jews are regarded as a holy race. Facts don’t matter. We must admire and respect Jews simply on the faith that they are always so wonderful and holy. Rules that apply to others don’t apply to Jews. The standards by which Jews judge others cannot be used by goyim(especially whites) against Jews. No matter how much whites concede and give up their rights, wealth, and power, it’s never enough. They must give up more and more. But then, no matter how much wealth, power, and privileged Jews accumulate, it is never enough. They deserve more and more. So, whites must have less and less, and Jews must have more and more. Even as whites have less, Jews have the right to bitch that whites still have too much and must give up more. Even as Jews have more, whites have no right to complain that Jews are getting too much at the expense of others. Israel must be a JEWISH state so that Jews can have everything, even West Bank and Golan Heights that are occupied territories. But Sweden must not be a nation for Swedes because that would mean Jews have no right to control the media and political policy in Sweden.

Jews, as the masters of globalism, play a dirty game. Like Bill Browder, they will say and do ANYTHING to get what they want. Integrity and principles mean nothing to these hideous Jews. Jews will denounce nationalism as the worst thing but then promote it selectively to rouse up a people against a power they don’t like. And this is the case with Sweden’s hysteria about Russia, which is not unlike what is going on in the US where Jews hype Russia-Hate as the New Patriotism. So, the very Jews who denounce any sign of nationalism in the EU urge Ukrainians to be ultra-nationalist in their confrontation with Russia. Jews did the same with Georgia. Of course, Jews always hedge their bets. Even as Jews promoted nationalism in Ukraine and Georgia, they also pushed Homomania there. Jews also allied with Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine. You see how Jews will do just about anything to get what they want? Because they see Russia as the main enemy, they will join up with any group, even Neo-Nazis, to hurt Russia. And even as Jews usually denounce nationalism in white nations, they will fan the most extremist manifestations of nationalism in places like Georgia and Ukraine to drive the peoples there into a frenzy of hatred against Russia. And of course, Jews also encouraged Kurdish nationalism when it suited Zio-Globalist interests. So, in the end, it all comes down to "Is it good for the Jews?"

Now, if Jews act in their own self-interest, it may not be very principled but it’s at least understandable from a tribal-supremacist point of view. The thornier question is why do so many non-Jews go along with the Jewish Program? For many elites, it’s sheer ambition and cynicism. They know all about Dirty Jews, but they also know Jews control the US that controls the world. So, if you want a short-cut to success and influence, you have to suck up to Jews. If the World was like Hollywood, all those who want to be actors, writers, and directors must suck up to Jewish executives and moguls. All the would-be players around the world know that the surest and quickest way to power is to appease and suck up to Jewish globo-homo moguls. That is why Georgia and Ukraine ended up with ‘gay pride parades’. Jewish moguls demanded such in exchange for support and money. But, not all non-Jewish globo-homo agents are such cynical players. Many are sincere in their convictions mainly due to their culture and/or personality. Many of these people are well-educated and smart but are dupes due to their personality being earnest and lacking in requisite skepticism of the Power.
Also, Jewish Power works according to a perverse logic. Even though Jews are the most powerful people in the world, the Shoah-aura shrouds them with the ray of ‘eternal victim-hood’. So, even as Jewish Power is immense, it presents itself as an underdog. And because Jews attach their power to Diversity, there is the impression that Jewish Power is committed to helping the poor and downtrodden. This plays on ‘white guilt’. In truth, the ONLY reason why Jews encourage Mass Invasion of the Third World into the West is to use the Diversity Mobs as political/electoral armies against the white race. But if anyone points this out, he is denounced and attacked for 'xenophobia'. What really ails the West is what might be called 'Amynaphobia', or extreme fear of defense or defending/preserving one's own ethnos, land, and culture.

The example of Sweden shows how even a highly intelligent people — white Swedes have among the highest IQ in the world — can be easily suckered by heinous Jews. To be intelligent doesn’t assure independent thought. Also, being intelligent in an orderly and efficient nation means you are likely to trust the system since it seems to run so smoothly. It's like one trusts a train system in which the trains arrive on time. So, intelligent Swedes, like intelligent white Canadians, just took it for granted that the academia and media were telling them the truth. Also, as nations like Canada and Sweden were so peaceful, orderly, and with low crime rates — and because the Jewish globo-homo media ‘white-washed’ the truth about black criminality and thuggery — , the peoples there were deer-in-the-headlights when it came to Diversity. Especially because of the mindless mantra ‘race is just a social construct’, white Canadians and Swedes came to believe that all the human misery around the world must be the result of ‘racism’, ‘white imperialism’, ‘greed’, religion, and etc. So, all those blacks in Africa are suffering due to ‘legacy of imperialism’, and the non-whites in Latin America suffer from ‘Yanqui imperialism’. Therefore, if those people were brought to the Magic Dirt of Northern Nations, they could transform overnight into brown version of successful Canadians and Swedes. LOL.
Of course, the reason why many non-whites do far worse in their own nations has to do with racial differences, but most people in Canada and Sweden will not entertain such thoughts since they’ve been raised since cradle with the mantra, "Race is a social construct". Now, considering that the GLOB say Europeans need more Africans because blacks are better at sports, one would think people would wake up to the fact of racial differences. After all, if indeed race is just about skin color and nothing else, why would blacks do better in sports? (And if blacks do better in sports, it means they are physically tougher, and that means blacks will pose a physical and sexual threat to the white race.) Now, it may be possible for Canadians and Swedes to wake up to the truth, but such isn’t possible without free thought. Problem is free thinking is nearly impossible in a climate of Moral Panic about this-ism, that-ism, whatever-ism. When so much of the truth is denounced and dismissed instantly as ‘racist’ or ‘antisemitic’, free thought is hard to come by. Take the example of Rick Sanchez who once said CNN and most of media are run by Jews who are very powerful and privileged and NOT a weak minority in the US. Now, in a climate of free thought, we could discuss the matter and come to some sound conclusion. Instead, the hysteria of Moral Panic soon consumed Rick Sanchez, and almost overnight, he found himself a non-person. This is how Jews run the West. They claim to be for ‘liberal democracy’ where we can discuss anything freely, BUT they set off hysteria after hysteria to make sound and rational discussion/debate on certain issues nearly impossible. For example, honest discussion of black thuggery is rare because any negative observation about blacks is immediately shot down with the alarmist term ‘racist’ that has a kind of dark-magic power over so many people.

Anyway, how funny that globalists who tell people to surrender their own identities, territories, and histories in the name of Diversity and Inclusion(which is euphemism for invasion) also tell people to be patriotic and nationalist against threats posed by nations like Russia and Iran. So, white Americans are supposed to give up what they'd inherited from their ancestors to endless tides of Third World mob BUT they are also supposed to get all gung-ho red-white-and-blue about saving the US from Russia. It makes no sense... until we factor in the Jewish Influence and the question, "Is it good for the Jews?" Indeed, what do the propositions "white Americans should surrender to Diversity" and "White Americans must be patriotic against Russia" have in common? Both positions are good for Jewish supremacist Power. If whites become a minority in the US(and in European nations), then whites cannot electorally challenge Jewish Power. Jews can play divide-and-rule among the various goyim and set them against one another. And anti-Russian stance is good for Jews because Jews, being a Jealous People, want to break the will of Russia and take over that nation like they took over US, UK, France, Sweden, and etc.
Also, even though Russia has ZERO intention of invading any nation, its example of nationalism, majoritarianism, implicit white consciousness, resurgent Christianity, and defiance of Zio-US globalism constitutes a kind of soft power that Jews fear. What if the Russian Example spreads to other nations? This ‘example’ doesn’t mean that other nations will adopt Russian language & culture or take orders from the Kremlin. Rather, it means that, maybe just maybe, they too can say NO to the demands of Zio-US globalism. Furthermore, when push comes to shove, they have a nation that is willing to back them up. After all, could Syria have survived the Jewish globo-terrorist onslaught if not for backing from Russia(and Iran)? Also, the cultural traditionalism and moralism that Putin has favored for Russia is threatening to the globo-homo cultural agenda of LGBTQ and Homomania, which is now the new religion in the West. In terms of aesthetics, traditionalism is far more beautiful and dignified than decadent trashy perversion though generally less fun-and-wild. In a world where so many people have been over-exposed to decadence and degeneracy, the Russian example(and even the Iranian example) may have a certain appeal. After all, should Rap and Pornography be the main cultural expression of a people? Sure, Russia has tons of trash culture, and lots of rap and porn too, but the fact that the national elites are trying to steer the populace away from stuff like Pussy Riot and Homomania indicates that Russia resists the End of History as favored by Jews. Russians are correct that the so-called End of History has brought about a new order that isn’t about war of ideologies but of idolatry and iconography. It’s about symbols and identities. Jewish identity matters most, and Jews will incite any identity they can use against whites. Are Jews totally trying to destroy whites? No, if whites were to vanish, Jewish power would vanish too. Jewish master must ride the white horse. Jews are really hellbent on keeping white power saddled and obedient, which means Jews must bait whites with Guilt and Fever, especially in relation to blacks. Whites are to feel ‘white guilt’ about slavery, and whites are to feel fever for Jungle Supremacy. Cucky-wucked white boys are supposed to worship black athletes, and white girls with jungle-lust are supposed to put out to them. It is time that American Schools replaced TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD with MANDINGO, which was made into a 1970s movie with Ken Norton humping some white woman. Jews use Mandela to bait whites with Guilt and Mandingo to infect whites with Fever. Mandela-Mandingo Complex is like the new Madonna-Whore Complex.

Anyway, we have anti-nationalist globalism encouraging nationalism against certain nations(especially Russia) to bolster the tribal-supremacism of Jews. If globalism is anti-nationalist, why should it matter if Sweden or any nation comes under undue influence of Russia? After all, doesn’t Open Borders mean cross-border invasions and influence? We've been told endlessly that Mexicans and Central Americans have the right to cross over into the US in any quantity. We are told Israel can infiltrate and play all sorts of games with EU and US. We are told EU must open its borders to endless tides of Muslims and Africans. Peoples of all nations(except Israel) are told that it will be GREAT if their nation is ‘reinvented’ and taken over by other peoples, just like Palestine was taken over by Zionists. If that is so, who cares if Russians take over your nation? If you must give up your nation to others, why not Russians?
Jews care because THEY want to take over all nations. Jews see Russia as a threat not because Russia is a competitor. Russia is NOT trying to invade or gain undue influence over other nations; it isn’t even interested in moving into Estonian or Lithuania. Jews see Russia as a threat because it gained a measure of national sovereignty from Jewish globo-homo power. Jews fear that other nations might take cues from Russia. Even if Russia pledges not to meddle in any nation and keeps its word to the letter, Jews would still panic about Russia because it regained national independence from Jewish Power. Jews fear that such defiance may spread to other nations, and we are seeing some of that in nations like Italy and Austria.
And that is why Jews, who usually tell white nations to just surrender everything to globalism, fan the nationalist flames in those nations with nonsensical trumped-up charges about Russia. Jews vilify Russia in the hope that no white American or European will ever look upon the Russian example as a positive, especially against globalist Jewish Power.
It gets even funnier when Jews try to persuade Europeans that the idea of ‘Western Values’ means Europe surrendering to endless tides of Africans and Muslims in the name of ‘tolerance’, ‘diversity’, and ‘inclusion’? Did Western philosophers through the ages really spout off such insipid baby-talk? Or, Jews will say there is nothing more patriotic in America than the Proposition that there is NO CORE America. So, white Americans are supposed to surrender their posterity and give up everything and even fight and die for their own demise because their defeat is the New Patriotism, the kind worth hating and fighting Russia for. Ann Coulter certainly saw through the BS of such Jewish Logic: http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-07-18.html

Leading Two Peoples is as Pointless as Serving Two Masters

Just as it’s difficult to serve two masters, it’s difficult to lead two peoples.

Why are so many white working class and underclass folks so lost and confused? Why are they so lacking in moral compass? It is because they get no leadership: politically, socially, culturally, historically, spiritually.

In the past, white leaders felt a racial-cultural-national connection with white masses and led them. White body was guided and watched over by the white mind. The white mind had a clearer sense of right and wrong, and it prodded the white body to act accordingly… like Moses leading the Hebrews.
But now, the white body has no leadership because the white mind no longer feels a direct connection with the white body. The covenant between the white elites and white masses has been broken. Jewish Globalists insist on the separation of white mind and white body.
Jewish academics inculcated white elites with ‘white guilt’ and promised them redemption ONLY IF they were to dump the Archie Bunkers of the world. Also, the Jewish Globalists, via control of mass entertainment, vulgarized the white masses with junk culture and Jerry Springer-ism so that they’d be deaf to sound advice if they ever heard it.

Today, white leaders/elites are expected to represent and care for ALL peoples than feel especially responsible for fellow white folks. But the interests of blacks, browns, yellows, Hindus, Muslims, and etc. are different from those of white folks(as well as from one another). When white leaders are supposed to represent Diversity than whiteness — esp when whites must bear the brunt of ‘white guilt’ — , white masses get no leadership. Also, as ‘white privilege’ is deemed evil, white elites(who still retain privilege) try to justify their own tainted privilege by cucking out to non-whites and especially Jews who, despite their super-privilege, flash the Shoah Card of Eternal Victimhood. (It must be said that the Current Order requires white elites to serve Jewish Globalist uber alles, and so it gives the lie to the notion of ‘anti-racism’. Jewish Power banished white identity from respectable discourse not so much to make white elites color-blind but to make them serve Jewish supremacism. After all, if Jews really want white elites to care for all groups equally, why do they push Palestinian-American interests to the back-burner in favor of Jewish-American interests.)

A man who tries to serve two or more masters will end up confused, betraying all the masters as well as himself in the absence of meaningful integrity of loyalty.

A man who tries to lead two, three, or more divergent peoples behold an impossible task. Imagine if Moses had tried to lead Egyptians, Hebrews, and Canaanites.

Even a figure as inspired as Gandhi couldn’t, in the end, represent both Muslim India and Hindu India and had to relent to the partitioning of British India into a Hindu majority nation and a Muslim majority nation, Pakistan. (Notice Netanyahu doesn’t pretend to represent Palestinians as well as Jews. He is a Jewish leader of Jews through and through.)

In time, the would-be leader of multiple peoples just becomes jaded and cynical. His pompous talk about Diversity degenerate into self-serving machination of careerism. As he finds it impossible to lead many peoples, he is resigned to serving himself and the one master: The Zionist-Globalist elites.
Even as the current white elites are dazed and confused in their failure to represent and lead all peoples, they are focused on serving ONE uber-master, the Glob. It’s easier to serve one master than lead many peoples. Currently, the West has only one master that counts: Jewish Globalism. No wonder then that so many politicians opt to serve the Jewish globalist uber-masters. Easier to serve the one than to lead the many.

Ideally, white elites would stop serving the Glob(aka globalist supremacism) and start to serve the white masses once again. Let non-white groups rely on their own non-white leaderships.

Anyway, the white race needs to think like blacks with NAACP and Jews with AIPAC. Even apart from electoral politics, blacks and Jews are represented by organizations that explicitly cater to their identities and interests. And Hispanics have La Raza, lately renamed to something else.

Whites need something similar. Of course, this pro-white organization that ALWAYS is geared to represent white identity and interests(regardless of winds of political fortune) must be sane and responsible. Unfortunately, explicit White Identity has been associated with KKK and the like, not least because the Jewish-run media and Jewish-funded watchdog groups like ADL and SPLC have created this impression that anything related to white or European consciousness must be associated with the ‘far right’ and the ‘Nazis’.

A National Humanist White Organization is most necessary. One that is moral and responsible.

Because most whites only rely on electoral politics, they feel represented or unrepresented depending on who wins elections. But if whites have powerful and well-organized socio-cultural organizations to represent them apart from politics, they will always feel empowered regardless of shifting political fortunes. It’s like Jews have ADL and AIPAC working on their behalf regardless of who is president, senator, or governor.