Why Fred Reed's Sentimental Standard-Boomerish Pleading for Jews is So Utterly Pathetic and Misguided — Jewish Intelligence Is Real but Talent Isn't Synonymous with Virtue

Do Jews Contain Microchips? by FRED REED - https://www.unz.com/freed/do-jews-contain-microchips/

A few weeks back I wrote a column suggesting that Jews have become successful because they are smart.

It’s more like Jews are Schmart. Jewish IQ is real but it’s really the combination of Jewish IQ, Jewish pushy-personality, Jewish pride(rooted in the Covenant), Jewish cunning(honed as merchants), and Jewish resentment(mainly that goyim are either tougher and/or more attractive) that explains Jewish Power. After all, Episcopalians have been said to have IQs equal to that of Jews, but they lack the personality and the sense of destiny that Jews have.

Imagine two kids. Both got the same IQ of 150. But one kid is just nice and bland whereas the other kid is neurotic and pushy. Who is going to demand more from life and others? Who is going to achieve more? Jews have an obsessive quality, and that fuels their IQ. Take Ron Jeremy who had the chutzpah to suck his own dick, an incredible image seared into my brain in grammar school by some Jewish kid who showed us one of his dad's secret video collection.

I predicted–it didn’t take much predicting—that there would follow great fury and anguish and thundering that Jews aren’t really that smart

Such people cannot handle reality. They are like the ones who say blacks aren't more muscular and athletic against all evidence, which is obvious and overwhelming by now. They are living in denial.
However, it is true that not all of Jewish wealth and power owe to merit. Many Jews have wealth or power way beyond their talent because of connections. It’s like smart Jews in the US pull strings to aid ALL Jews in Israel, even the dim ones. And plenty of Jews who are smart-but-not-too-smart got ahead due to nepotism or tribalism. Hollywood is full of these people who are smart-but-not-too-smart. In contrast, many smart goyim are shut out of many institutions and industries because they are deemed ‘antisemitic’, ‘racist’, or ‘homophobic’, made all the worse by our ‘cancel culture’. In contrast, a Jew can be full of hatred toward Arabs and Palestinians(and whites), but that won’t stand in the way of his rise to fame and fortune. Look at all the Neocons who messed up the Middle East but are still in business and favored by elite institutions. If you're Nick Fuentes, the state takes all your money without explanation. But if you're a Jewish crook, you either get pardoned by politicians or never charged in the first place. If you're white and call out on Jewish Evils, you are deemed a 'hater', but Jews who pervert foreign policy into carrying out mayhem against Arabs and Muslims are hailed as statesmen.

But if those doing the resentful hissing and snarling really believe that every aspect of our lives is run by Jews, perhaps from a control room deep beneath Manhattan, does this not imply we, the controlled, must be weak, feckless, dim, easily led and, well, contemptible? Are the rest of us really as helpless and docile as the hissers hold us to be? I mean, honest, I can actually dress myself.

Most people are weak, feckless, dim, easily led, and well… contemptible. Look at the German masses spellbound by Adolf Hitler. Even when Der Fuhrer brought ruin on the nation, they followed his every command. Look at all those Chinese youths who attacked their own culture and heritage at the behest of madman Mao during the imbecilic Cultural Revolution. So, it’s true that many people are idiots swayed by manipulation from above. As Jews control the white cuck elites who represent the white masses, white folks today are mostly retarded.

But it’s not just about stupidity or dimness. Even smart people tend to bend to the will of the strong and bow before what’s officially deemed sacrosanct. Albert Speer was a smart, sophisticated, and talented man, but his personality was weaker than that of Hitler. Hitler exuded strength, will, determination, a kind of sorcerous spell over others. It’s like Steve Jobs was no high-tech genius and relied on others to do the heavy-lifting, but he had the power of personality, and so the geeks flocked around his feet. Zhou En-Lai was smarter than Mao Zedong but did the latter’s bidding because Mao was such an indomitable figure, a relentless force of nature.

In the test of wills(or game of chicken), Wasps lost out to Jews. So, there are plenty of smart whites who bend to Jewish Will. Ayn Rand wasn’t exactly the most rational person(despite her so-called Objectivism), but she was such a force of personality that she developed a mass cult following among goyim. Pauline Kael’s fame owed not only to her talent(which was real) but her zealous personality. Some smart whites can’t stop gushing about Tom Stoppard. White folks came to revere the Bible because it was written by Jews with prophetic vision, a quality lacking among whites. We know Fred Cabbage-Head Reed isn’t Jewish because he’s such a mellow melon-head. He sounds like someone who’d be content with a can of beer and a bag of pretzels.

But Jews, being clever, knew that force-of-will wasn’t enough to ensure white obeisance to Jews. After all, the power of will may elicit admiration and awe in others but not necessarily guilt and reverence. In order for Jews to totally own whites, they needed to concoct Holocaustianity as replacement for Christianity. The Cult of Shoah proselytize that Jews died for the sins of the white race. Jews are the new christs, the Jew-sus. White folks have been raised on the Holocaustianity cult and feel tremendous guilt about Jews. If you don’t believe in the orthodoxy of the 6 million, you are a DENIER, akin to a heretic. You must be burned at the stake. So, it's the combination of Jewish Talent and Jewish Tragedy that makes whites so submissive to Jews.

For the record, I have found Jews other than some Israelis to be pretty good people,

As individuals, most people are pretty good people(with the exception of Negroes and maybe Gypsies). If you walked around National Socialist Germany in the 1930s, most of those Nazis would come across as decent people, even to Jews. Courteous, helpful, and kind. Same with most Japanese as individuals in the period of Military Rule. Likewise, most Jews as individuals are not monsters. They don’t kill babies and eat them. They are not going to hack you with an axe. So, the problem isn’t the monstrousness of every individual Jew. Rather, just like the Germans, though mostly nice, were supportive of a radical ideology during the National Socialist era, most Jews are supportive of globalist agenda that is essentially Jewish Supremacist and destructive of humanity. Jewish Power has grown cancerous. If you take any single cancer cell, it is no big deal. But all the cancer cells taken together threaten the very fabric of life itself. There are cancer cells even in the bodies of those who aren't stricken with the dreaded disease. The immune system keeps them in check. But when cancer cells began to grow and gain momentum, they become dangerous and fatal. One Matt Yglesias is just some funny eccentric kid. But a whole bunch of them, especially in elite levels, means the acceleration of the globalist agenda and taking in a billion immigrants as peons for Jews, thus destroying the Core West.

Just ask the Palestinians. A honest Palestinian will tell you that most individual Jews are not monsters but people just like you and me — people with families and jobs dealing with mundane problems. But that doesn’t change the fact that Jews are invested in Zionist Imperialism that aims to wipe out all of Palestine.
It’s like most Americans(minus Negroes) are nice people but their idiotic fixation with the notions of the ‘exceptional nation’ and ‘support the troops’ have turned them into knucklehead shills of globalist supremacist lunacy.

Most of the squalling and fulmination aforementioned supports my not very astonishing assertion that Jews get ahead for the obvious reasons that explain the advance of any brighter group operating among the less bright: Indians and Chinese in Africa, Chinese in Indonesia, Australians and abos in Australia, and so on.

But your assertion implies a fallacy, i.e. certain groups are smarter and work harder, therefore their success owes to virtue and honesty. In truth, a people can be smarter and work harder and earn more and STILL be a bunch of a-holes. This is certainly true of Hindus in Africa or America. Sure, they work harder than most people, but Hindus are among the most insufferable two-faced a-holes in the world. Chinese aren’t big on principles either. Sure, they are smarter and work harder than the ridiculous Indonesians, but they're also corrupt, vain, snotty, shallow, and full of contempt. Look at Hong Kong Chinese. Just because they got a leg up on making money, they thumb their noses at Mainlanders. They act like honorary whites or Americans and look upon fellow Chinese as a bunch of 'deplorable' hillbillies.

So, just because Jewish IQ and hard work are real doesn’t mean that Jews are virtuous or play fair. It doesn’t mean that they use their hard-earned wealth and privilege in ways that are good for most people or ethical by world standards. Take Paul Singer. I’m sure he’s a hard worker, but he’s still a lowlife dirty crook. Take Jewish casino moguls. I’m sure they are smart and work hard, but gambling is mass theft. And I’m sure those Jews in Wall Street are very smart, but they’ve been cooking up all sorts of dirty schemes to rip us off. And even though they’ve been preaching free markets, when their fortunes go south, they use whore politicians to get massive bailouts… as in 2009.

Talent is not virtue. A Negro can meritocratically succeed in sports but could still be a lowlife punk. A Jew, Hindu, or Chinese can use smarts and make lots of money but still be corrupt and abuse their wealth and privilege.

Personally, I used to be pretty pro-capitalist. I didn’t care if some people became billionaires and zillionaires. I turned against the rich because they use their power to take away our rights, freedoms, and guns. Because they use their power of media and culture to spread globo-homo degeneracy. Because they use their monopoly in big tech to shut down alternative and dissident voices. Because they use their power of finance to deny services to people who dare speak truth to Jewish Power. I don’t mind others having lots of money but do mind when they use the money to corrupt the process and take away our basic rights.

I have not actually heard anyone saying that Jews contain microchips or nanoparticles to alter our DNA, but I expect this any day now.

Jews got something even better. Control of the airwaves. In war, the side with air supremacy has the advantage. It’s like the Gulf War. US had total air supremacy, and Iraqi soldiers and tanks became shooting ducks. In WWII, the Allies gained air supremacy over Germany and Japan and bombed those nations to smithereens at will.
In the Culture War, it’s all about Airwaves Supremacy. Jews control the airwaves that enter through our TVs and radios. And Jews now also monopolize the biggest platforms on the internet. So, Jews control the flow of information. That means Jews control our brainwaves. Fred the Cabbagehead Reed is a chump boomer whose brainwaves have been altered by Jewish messaging. So, he repeats the same boomerish mantras we’ve all heard a million times…

As for the ‘vaccine’ or ‘toccine’, why should we take it? If Covid were as horrifying as Polio or Small Pox, I would bite the bullet and take it. Or, if medical trials over several years deemed the ‘vaccine’ pretty safe, I might consider taking it… like I’ve gotten flu shots once in awhile. But Covid is not a mass-killer, and who knows what the long-term effects of the ‘vaccine’ are? Also, there is no denying that Covid hysteria was manufactured by Jews to rig the election, to enforce social controls, and to rake in massive profits.

This is not the time to be Mikey of the Cereal commercial. If Fred the Cabbagehead wants it, I say take it and all the booster shots. But keep it away from us. “Fred likes it! He likes it.”

For example, CTs believe not only in black helicopters, FEMA camps into which conservatives will be stuffed come the Reset, and a half-dozen (at least) conspiracies involving the virus, but also that Jews destroyed the Twin towers and killed JFK. I sleep with a loaded pistol.

Jewish Garland pretty much declared all Trump supporters as ‘domestic terrorists’. What’s happening now in Australia? They are seriously talking of ‘vaccine mandates’ all over the West. I don’t know about JFK, but one thing is sure about 9/11. The Israeli intelligence kept tabs on the Islamic terrorists. Israelis knew what was up, and if they knew, Neocons in the US knew. But nothing was done to foil the plot. Larry Silverstein’s actions prior to and on the day of 9/11 are awful suspicious. So, even though Muslim nutjobs did it, who can deny they were nudge-nudged by Jews who were looking for a New Pearl Harbor to sway the American Public in supporting Wars for Israel? People like dumbass George W. Bush and John McCain were dupes and shills of the Grand Plan. And it’s almost like the Jews are doing the thinking for Fred the Cabbagehead Reed. Nudge Nudge.

Jews of course tend to be politically liberal and so regarded as enemies by the anti-Jewish folk, mostly conservative. Note that liberals are highly inclusive in outlook, regardless of whether it makes sense in a given case, while conservatives are by nature hostile to outgroups, whether it makes sense in a given case or not.

Jews are POLITICAL liberals, which means they are NOT principled liberals. Jews use liberalism to weaken white identity and unity, all the better to serve Jewish unity and identity. Jewish liberalism is selective, not universal. So-called Jewish Liberals in the US will support the ultra-nationalist Israel that is into racial identity and pride of heritage and blood-and-soil thing.
Jews are ‘inclusive’ to the extent that they want goy societies to INCLUDE Jews and let Jews climb to the top and subvert goy majority power. Jews demand to be included by goyim, but that doesn’t mean Jews are inclusive of all goyim. How many Palestinian-American columnists have written for New York Times or Wall Street Journal or Washington Post? How come all Jews, ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’, use their power to push anti-BDS laws? That isn’t very inclusive of justice for Palestinians.

And when Jews insist on more inclusion by mass immigration, they mean to increase diversity in goy nations so as to play divide-and-conquer among diverse goyim. Notice what Jews push on Hungary and Poland doesn’t apply to Israel. Surely, Fred the Cabbagehead knows about this, so why is he pretending otherwise?

Mainline conservatives believe in small government, lower taxes, states’ rights, individual liberty, traditional morality, and such.

Mainline conzos believe in taking it up the arse from Jews. They are into ‘muh Israel’, and that is why the GOP and even Donald Trump have been utterly useless. If anything, they sound just like Fred the Cabbagehead Reed.

Better to listen to BroNat, one of the ten greatest Jews of all time, the man who brought together the will of Moses, the vision of Jesus, humor of Marx Brothers, and wit of Bob Dylan.

THE REAL AFGHAN FLOP by Brother Nathanael

Commentary on "Notes on a Curious People: The Maya and Their Doings"(by Fred Reed)

https://fredoneverything.org/the-maya-who-woulda-thunk-it/

This is probably because they were in fact murdering, torturing savages given to human sacrifice. Why this is thought especially reprehensible is a mystery. The Romans sacrificed large numbers... so that the public could enjoy watching them die, crucified large numbers, and poured molten lead down the throats of criminals. In the European witch hunts, sort of 1450-1750, some 500,000 were killed depending on whose numbers you accept... The Tudors hanged criminals, cut them down still conscious, opened their abdomens and removed their bowels while still alive... . And of course everybody and his dog put entire cities to the sword, from Joshua to Hiroshima. Despite their best efforts the Maya could not keep up with the moderns.

Why was Mayan human sacrifice 'worse' than the bloodbaths of Western Civilizations? Romans shed blood for entertainment or punishment. Now, killing people for entertainment is ugly and grisly, but it is what it is. Mass spectacle. Romans didn't pretend otherwise, as if it could be anything more than bloody fun. People like to see violence. Lots of people love violent movies and violent video-games. People love to see animal programs where predators hunt down prey. Americans are addicted to violent football and fighting sports. Romans did it for real, with bodies piling up in earnest. But Romans never claimed there was any moral or spiritual dimension to gladiator sports. As for practices like the crucifixion, they were meant as punishment. A bit extreme perhaps but still a tool of 'justice' and power, nothing more and nothing less. Draconian but meant to send a strong message to make people comply with the Order. At the very least, the innocent weren't randomly summoned to be crucified. (It's also worth mentioning that gladiatorial sports could, in some ways, be a crude form of justice, at least according to the movie GLADIATOR. Certain criminals were forced into it. Also, conquered men of other tribes who were spared death were given a second chance to prove their mettle in the arena.)

As for European witch-hunts, while they could be ugly and violent, the point was to hunt down demonic forces and root out evil. Europeans believed that certain individuals were possessed of evil spirits or practiced witchcraft in service to Satan. So, they believed 'witches' must be exposed and punished in the name of God. Witch-hunts were NOT carried out to honor Devil but to ward him off.

As for the Tudors, they certainly had an ugly way to handling criminals, but it was still a form of justice, punishment for bad elements.

In any case, one could put forth moral and/or rational arguments against the practices of the Romans, Christians, and Tudors. One could argue that gladiatorial sports, while fun and exciting, were cruel and ugly. One could argue that hunting witches, though in the name of God against Satan, was excessive and unforgiving(against the preaching of Jesus). And one could argue that the Tudors were a bit too outlandish in their treatment of criminals. Even if we agree that earlier European civilizations acted in ugly, gross, and excessive ways, we can still understand the motivations behind them on the human and even moral level. Romans favored thrill over good-will in their addiction to blood spectacles. And Romans, Christians, and Tudors were overly zealous in meting out punishment or rooting out Evil.

But what is to make of the Mayan human sacrifice? It wasn't for sports or entertainment, which would have been ugly but understandable as spectacle & entertainment. It wasn't to root out evil(as in the witch-hunts common in Medieval Europe). It wasn't to punish the criminal elements as most who were killed hadn't committed any crime.
It was a ritual of sacrificing innocents to amoral or even immoral gods. The very cosmology of the Mayans was morbid and psychotic. It believed that the universe is ruled by cruel, uncaring, and sadistic gods who demand sacrifice of the innocent. Against such cosmological psychopathy, no moral or rational argument could be put forth. The culture was demonic and demented at its very core. Christians misused the teachings of the just God. Mayans correctly served their immoral gods who demanded the slaughter of innocents.

And that may have been why no South American civilization achieved traction and longterm viability. They could make art, do math, pursue astronomy, and build temples. But they failed to conceive of a deep and resilient theory or vision of justice.
Greeks and Romans, even as pagans, believed in gods possessed of the power of reason and justice, though far from perfect themselves. Apollo and Athena upheld reason, order, and intelligence. Zeus was not without sentiment and, when not indulging his whims with the ladies, tried to be fair-and-balanced with other gods and humans.
And even though Jews and Christians stained their hands with blood time and time again, their conception of God was one of power AND justice. In contrast, the spiritual conceptions of South American civilizations were dead in soul. While alive in the arts, architecture, and rudiments of 'science' and math, they failed to bridge the gap between cosmology and rationality and morality. Their gods were all about the whims of power.
Civilization after civilization, from Mayans to Aztecs to Incas, they fell into the trap of ritual human sacrifice to appease the appetites of amoral or even immoral gods. When a people believe that even the gods lack souls, they are bound to fall no matter their achievement in monuments and math.

As for modern wars and their massacre of millions, war is hell. Always has been and always will be.

In Response to Fred Reed’s Observations about the Military and Conservatism - Of Jews and Dogs

The Military instinct: The Human Race as Feral Dogs

https://fredoneverything.org/the-military-instinct-the-human-race-as-feral-dogs/

Fred Reed: Recently the collapse of the Soviet Union appeared to offer a prospect of extended peace. There seemed nothing left to fight about, at least on any scale. Yet the United States quickly launched a half dozen wars of no necessity and threatened others. Why?

WHY? Well, which group in the US has (1) elite control over institutions and (2) special animus against Russia, Iran, and any nation that happens to be disliked by Judea and/or Israel?

Mexican-Americans? Black-Americans? Hindu-Americans? Greek-Americans? Eskimos?

The answer is simpler. It’s World Jewry or Jewish Globalist power. If Jewish Power had never gained supremacy in America, the US military would not have invaded Iraq, would not be foaming at the mouth at Iran, wouldn’t have engineered a coup in Ukraine, and would not have triggered a ‘new cold war’ with Russia, a nation with an economy on par with Italy!

True, there is a male-warrior instinct, but if US military ventures are primarily motivated by Male Aggression Principle, why isn’t US calling for war with Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe? Or with Israel? After all, the UN has a long list of human rights violations committed by Israel.
The real issue revolves around the question of "Who gets to choose the targets(as outlets for male warrior aggression)?" ‘Male’ or ‘conservative’ aggression is satisfied with hunting and destroying ANY enemy, therefore real power rests in those who get to choose the target for destruction. It's like chefs will cook anything: fish, fowl, meat, or vegetables. It all depends on who's holding the menu and making the order. The US military is a kitchen of destruction. It waits for orders from those who are looking at the menu. And it's the Jews who got the menus.

It’s like dogs will happily hunt any animal. The real question concerns who gets to decide what is to be hunted? Should the hunt be for rabbits, foxes, wild boars, deer? Dogs don’t decide. They obey the master. In America, those who get to choose the prey for the predatory military are ethno-tribal in nature. They are Jews.

Fred Reed: Dogs form packs, mark territory, and bark furiously at strange dogs. So, it seems, do people. An empire is just the result of these canine instincts.

But dogs lack agency. They look to their master for orders and approval. So, even though dogs naturally love to fight, hunt game, or just growl at other animals, they rely on the master to decide what should be hated, hunted, fought, or growled at, as well as what to be gentle with, showered with affection, protected, and/or loved. A dog can love or hate another animal or particular person... depending on the wishes of the master.

If dogs are ordered to attack, they will. If they’re ordered to show affection, they will. If you rouse a dog to attack and kill a cat, it will gladly. But if you admonish the dog to befriend the cat and treat it nicely, it will do just that.

Yes, the US military is like a dog, and it lacks agency. It follows orders. And its masters are in organizations like AIPAC. John McCain the militarist only hates nations and peoples hated by Jews. John McCain is McCanine. If Judea told him to be nice to Putin and treat Russia as a friendly nation, he will change his tune overnight. People like McCain not only crave an enemy to hate but a master to serve. As World Jewry are the current master of the West, dogs like McCain do their bidding.

Or consider the Wehrmacht. Sure, there were German generals and soldiers who relished a good battle and the blood-and-guts ‘heroism’ associated with war. But their animus or amity depended on the Fuhrer. When Adolf Hitler told them that USSR is an ally, they were happy to shake hands with Soviet troops. When Hitler ordered them to attack Russia, they did so at the drop of a hat and killed millions.

Fred Reed: Conservatives tend to be tribal, intensely loyal to their group–race, country, ethnicity, religious faith–which in national terms becomes patriotism. They lack empathy.

Actually, conservatives have more sympathy for people within the group, community, or tribe. Liberals feel less kinship sympathy for their own kind. Also, ‘empathy’ isn’t necessarily sympathy. It means the ability to read other people’s thoughts and feelings. The reason why some conservatives lack sympathy for certain other groups is precisely because they are empathetic in reading their minds. For instance, a keen conservative can read the mind of a Negro and see through the BS about ‘social justice’. They look into the Negro male mind and hear, “Where da white women at?” and read the Negro female mind and hear, “My booty be da center of everything.” And keen conservatives are empathetic in reading the minds of Jewish Neocons and their dirty tricks.

Liberals may appear ‘empathetic’ because they claim to be more open-minded about OTHER peoples, but this has less to do with genuine empathetic understanding of others than a naive conceit in their trust or superficial interest in the Other. Most Libby-dibbers who open their hearts and borders to Muslims have NO IDEA what Muslims are really after. Most Libby-dibbers who get all mushy about homos have no idea how the homo mind really works. Homos are vain, narcissistic, self-centered, and bitchy. But libby-dibbers see them as the New Saints who materialized out of ‘rainbows’. True empathy requires the keenness of mind to read the hearts of others. It’s like what Michael Corleone says in THE GODFATHER PART 2. He tries to see things as others see things.



Now, it’s true that many Conservatives are mere morons into ‘Muh country, muh God and muh guns, and etc’. But then, so many libby-dibs are into ‘Muh self-righteous vanity, muh Diversity and muh Inclusion, and etc’. They are enthralled with silly slogans and pat chants.

Fred Reed: Soldiers invariably fit the conservative pattern, prizing loyalty to their units and to their country, seeing threats everywhere, and becoming alarmed easily.

True, but the imperialist mindset can be construed as libby-dib. Most conzo-wonzos are content with what they got, what they are familiar with. It’s the libby-dibs who want more and get tired with what they already have. This leads to an imperialist mindset. (The ultra-conservative systems of Byzantine and East Asia were not interested in conquering or converting the entire world.) Also, libby-dibs believe they are intellectually and culturally superior, and such attitude leads them to believe that they have the moral right to remake the entire world in their image and ideal.

So, the US empire is a fusion of doglike conzo-wonzo soldiers and birdlike libby-dibby imperialists. After all, isn’t it odd that the US is now an empire that sends its soldiers to invade and transform other nations to… raise the Homo Flag?

So, aggression principle has both a conzo-wonzo aspect and a libby-dibby aspect.

Conzo warrior mentality is more defensive and preservative. Pre-Modern East Asia was very conservative, and its military was all about defending the realm from foreigners. This changed only in the 19th century as the the libby-dib West forced Asia to open up to world trade... or get blown to smithereens. (The two times Japan went into imperialist mode owed to Western influence. Hideoyoshi got guns and backing from the West. And modern Japan modeled itself on European and American empires.) Akira Kurosawa’s KAGEMUSHA is about the wisdom of cautionary conservatism in war. Be like a mountain and preserve the domain. Don’t risk losing the domain with vain ambition. But the reckless son wants to win it all and gambles everything, even losing the domain. (Ironically, the ‘far-rightist’ Hitler was more of a libby-dib warrior in ambition, and ‘far-leftist’ Stalin was more of a conzo-wonzo warrior in caution.)



Libby holy crusader mentality is more offensive and transformative. The West became the most progressive part of the world and waged offensives to conquer and transform all the world with Christianity, free trade, ‘human rights’, and etc.

Same goes for religion. The conzo spiritual mindset is more orthodox, more about preserving tradition and dogma. The libby spiritual mindset is more about spreading the gospel or the Truth to all of mankind, even if it means killing countless heathens and infidels. Communism was a secular version of the libby missionary mindset.

Now, there is good and bad side to both conzo mentality and libby mentality.

Conzos are less aggressive outwardly and therefore less likely to conquer other peoples. But this ultra-defensive posture can lead to isolationism, stagnation, and fear of new ideas that might bring forth progress. This is why the Ottoman Empire and East Asia fell behind the more dynamic and liberal West.

As for Libbies, they are more aggressive, adventurous, and ambitious. So, unlike the conzo Hindusphere and East Asia, the more libby Western Europe discovered the world and created new trade routes and made advances in every field. But it also meant conquest, imperialism, slave trade on massive scale, genocide, and etc. And today, the cult of Tolerance among Western libbies is leading to mass invasion by the Third World that could very well mean the end of Western Civilization.

Ideal is a kind of balance of conzo and libby tendencies. But in the US, both the conzo and libby tendencies of gentiles are harnessed to serve the ethno-ambition of Jewish globalists who manipulate and command gung-ho US conservative soldiers to invade and destroy nations(hated by Israel) and also to ensure the spread of Homomania and Hollywood values. Instead of a meaningful balance of conzo-ness and libby-ness, both are perverted to serve ethno-supremacist ambitions and homo-negro degeneracy.

Now, the US could play a responsible role as the policeman of the world. After all, there’s always the chance of dogs around the world getting out of control and barking and attacking one another. If a responsible person were to wield the stick and command the field, the dogs would know who’s boss and learn to behave. US could play this role if it were ruled by sane and sensible leaders.

But instead, the US is like a demented master that trains and encourages some dogs to attack other dogs. Indeed, American Power is now like Jews-as-masters abusing and exploiting goy Americans as bulldogs. US has become the master of New World Disaster. It used Jihadis to tear Libya and Syria apart. It encourages Saudis to raise tension levels with Iran. It used neo-nazi elements in Ukraine. It provokes North Korea with military drills with servile South Korea, a yellow dog that takes orders from American dogs who take orders from the Jewish Master.
Even US allies come under US bullying. So, even if a nice nation like Hungary wants to be friendly with the US, Russia, and Iran, the big US bully steps forth and says YOU CAN’T TRADE WITH THEM BECAUSE WE SAY NO(AND WE SAY NO BECAUSE JEWS SAY NO); IF YOU DISOBEY, WE WILL DESTROY YOU THROUGH SANCTIONS AND INTERFERENCE VIA CIA.
It’s how the current world is.