On Amazon's 'Europhobic' Book Banning — White Liberation/Emancipation from Jewish Supremacist Tyranny is possible only by way of Identification with Palestinian Plight in West Bank — Just like Trump flipped ‘Fake News’ on his enemies, Whites must do the same with ‘Hate Speech’, e.g. accuse Jewish Supremacism of the ultimate Hate Speech and Hate Acts

https://www.amren.com/commentary/2019/02/amazon-and-the-end-of-free-speech/

The internet giant’s new wave of censorship.
White Identity by Jared Taylor has just been delisted by Amazon. Like most cases of this kind, the digital book burning was in response to a hit piece. An article from Quartz called “There’s a disturbing amount of neo-Nazi and white supremacist material on Amazon” frothed about White Identity and other titles. The piece was headlined by a picture of a flaming swastika and a group of people performing the stiff-armed salute.

The article recycles the usual silliness, claiming Mr. Taylor is a “white supremacist who has earned a place in the Southern Poverty Law Center’s ‘Extremist Files.’” But the most “extreme” quote Quartz could find from the book was a warning to whites: “If they do not defend their interests they will be marginalized by groups that do not hesitate to assert themselves, numerically and culturally.” The fact that White Identity has been banned while books championing “black power” are still on sale suggests Mr. Taylor is correct.

Another book targeted by the article—and banned by Amazon—was the The White Nationalist Manifesto by Dr. Greg Johnson, in which he “argues for ‘the right of all white peoples to self-determination.’” There is no explanation as to why this is bad or even controversial. Meanwhile, black nationalist flags and books promoting Aztlán continue to be sold.

Why did Amazon do this? ADL and SPLC are the Kosher Nostra of American Thought Police. ADL took over thought-control on Twitter and kicked off Jared Taylor. Jeff Bezos is all about money. He has no interest in anything else. So, he takes orders from ADL and SPLC(playing role of PC rabbi) to sniff out what isn't kosher. And just like Twitter, Amazon went after Taylor.

Jewish Power was behind this. Taylorism has failed. He thought that by suppressing criticism of Jewish influence, the Power would go easy on him. Nope. He was targeted even above David Duke who still has Twitter acct.

Ironically, American Renaissance has censored or deleted many comments critical of Jewish Power, perhaps in the hope that it will go easy on Taylor and Amren. It was wishful thinking. While Amren attracted some Jewish thinkers, they are utterly without influence among powerful Jews. No matter how much Taylor suppresses or discourages criticism of Jewish Power, Jewish Power will hate him because he stands for resurgence of white consciousness. Jews are now in supremacist mode, and their power depends on whites rejecting white identity and cucking to Jewish identity and interest. So, even if Taylor isn't anti-Jewish, Jews see him as a threat because he stands for whites people having their own identity and interests. That is deeply threatening to Jewish supremacist power that is nothing without white submission.

Now, this doesn't mean we should embrace crazy neo-nazi talk or KKK nonsense. I've long denounced such views and associations. But we should be vocal in calling out Jewish power, but Amren has suppressed much legitimate criticism of Jewish Power. I never spouted Neo-Nazi nonsense, but many of my comments have been deleted by Amren because they were critical of Jewish Power and Zionist hypocrisy.

Taylor suggested we use the term 'white advocacy', which sounds less confrontational than 'white nationalism' or 'white power'. It's a good term, but it misses the crucial point. In order for whites to advocate for white identity and interests, they must first liberate and emancipate themselves from tyranny. What is the nature of this tyranny? Taylor should know from his Twitter ban and difficulty in organizing conferences. ADL got him kicked off Twitter with the full backing of Jewish-controlled media and academia. And the judge threw out the case. So, mere advocacy for white interests isn't enough. Whites need something stronger. Whites need to begin with the call for White LIBERATION and White EMANCIPATION. Whites need to call for White AUTONOMY. Such terminology ennobles white politics because it implies white people, far from being masters of America, are actually indentured servants to a bigger power. Liberation and Emancipation from what? We must speak frankly. It is Jewish Power. It's not Eskimos who control the media. It's not Hawaiians who control law schools, law firms, and the courts. It's not Mexicans who control the media. It's not Muslims who control Paypal. It's not blacks who control Twitter or Amazon. Most of the Power in the US is with Jews or with white cucks who've been allowed to get rich by conforming to the Narrative. Trump slightly deviated from the Narrative, and just look at the Jewish rage directed towards him even though he's done nothing but praise Israel and Jews.

White Advocacy is all well and good, but it must follow White Liberation and White Emancipation first. First,there must be liberation from Jewish oligarchy, Jewish tyranny, Jewish ethno-monopoly of media, academia, law and courts, and deep state. And finance. Whites must boldly speak the truth that they are under the occupation of globo-homo tyranny mainly funded and led by Jewish oligarchs and commissars. Before anything is possible, a people must seek liberation and emancipation. A dog isn't going to run freely unless it breaks loose of the leash. White Liberation or Emancipation movement must name Jewish Supremacism as the main culprit. Jewish-supremacism is mono-nationalist and says only Jews and Israel are deserving of nationalism, identity, and ethnic interest. All other people, the filthy goyim, must welcome diversity and ethnic demise via endless immigration-invasion and race-mixing. Jewish power says we must all support Israel's right to be a Jewish state, but then it pressures all goy nations, Hungary or Japan, to become like Brazil.

By calling for White Liberation/Emancipation, white people will gain the moral advantage vis-a-vis Jews who can be outed as the real supremacist power in the equation. After all, so-called white privilege is NOTHING compared to Jewish privilege. Jews are 2% of the US but rule this nation, the lone superpower. Proof of Jewish-supremacism: Whereas the media tirelessly bitch about 'too many whites', they never discuss the problem of 'too many Jews' in elite institutions and industries. The implication is Jews are above criticism and can accumulate all the power and influence in the world. Meanwhile, whites must be berated endlessly for their diminishing power and wealth. Next, consider US foreign policy. It is totally geared to serve Jewish Supremacism. Israel has 300 nukes made of uranium stolen from the US, but no problem. Iran has no nukes and passed all international inspections, but it's seen as a huge problem. Israel that has illegal nukes gets billions in aid. Iran that has no nukes gets sanctioned. Also, Israel was created from mass immigration-invasion. Palestinians were pushed off their own land by waves of Jewish immigrant-invaders. And now, Jewish caravans continue to pour into West Bank to take the remaining territory. Just like Jewish power forbids Americans from protecting their borders against illegal invaders, Zionist power makes it impossible for Palestinians in West Bank to stop the endless streams of Jewish invader-settlers. A mere coincidence? Or is it because both Palestinians in West Bank and whites in the US are under the occupation of the Same Tribe?

Do we see a pattern? A double-standard? Israel can have illegal nukes but is showered with praise and billions. Iran has no nukes but is hit with sanctions. Israel continues to steal land from Palestinians, but it is rewarded with accolades and money. Palestinians lament over the loss of remaining territories in West Bank, but they are neglected or insulted by the US state and media. Even so-called 'liberal' New York Times sides with right-wing Israel over Palestinians.
Indeed, the power in the West is no longer about left vs right. After all, why does the supposedly 'leftist' Democratic Party wholly support the far-right Israel while denouncing leftist Venezuela? What the power dynamics is really about boils down to "Is it good for Jewish supremacism?" Jews hate leftist Venezuela because it is allied with Iran and Russia, and therefore the Democratic Party attacks Venezuela even though both are supposedly 'leftist'. And Democratic Party is full of praise of right-wing Israel because it's good for Jews. For Jews, it's identity over ideology, and that is why they win over whites for whom it's ideology over identity(esp due to Jewish influence in media and academia).

Jewish Power treats white Americans like it treats Iran and Palestinians. It cries out in pain as it strikes them. It's like the Crown Heights Incident in which a Jewish car ran over a black kid, but the ambulance treated the passenger than the kid. Double standard.
As things stand, it's as if Jews can never do wrong. Jews can make all the money, form monopolies, spy on the US, spread cultural degeneracy, promote racial hatred(against Muslims in Hollywood movies and against whites in TV and advertising), turn Disney into a kiddie porn factory, shut down BDS(even criminalize the movement for justice for Palestinians), and steer US toward fighting Wars for Israel that killed 100,000s of Arabs and Muslims. No problem. Jews are above the law. They can have endless AIPAC conferences that are like Nuremberg rallies. They can promote Jewish pride and make politicians pledge that US mainly exists to serve Israel uber alles.
In contrast, if white people say something as innocuous as "It's Okay to be White", lo and behold, Jewish Power has SPLC and ADL alert all the media(run by Jews) about a great 'hate crime'. Hollywood gave us 'kill whitey' movies like DJANGO UNCHAINED. Jewish-controlled Media promote endless interracist propaganda to spread jungle fever and afro-colonization-of-white-wombs. Jewish-run media sensationalize endless hate hoaxes about 'white racism' but overlook tons of real black-on-white violence. Jewish power looks upon whites as slaves. Whites better not be 'uppity'.

When Jewish Power in the US treats white people like how Zionists treat Palestinians in West Bank, isn't it time for whites to wake up and identify & empathize with Palestinians? After all, no matter how much white people praise and flatter Jews, Jews will not see whites as Honorary Fellow Jews but as White Palestinians who need to be tamed, beaten, and exploited. Sackler family made its billions by addicting whites to opioids, just like the Sassoon family(also Jewish) sold opium to the Chinese and destroyed millions of lives.

Jared Taylor can try to win the graces of Jewish Power all he wants. The fact is Jewish Power will treat him as a White Palestinian. Jewish Power is in supremacist mode and demands that white people cuck to Jews. Any mention of white identity and interests is denounced as uppity defiance against Jewish Supremacism. No matter how cordial Taylor is to Jews, Jews will see him as an 'waker' of White consciousness that may lead to white independence from Jewish supremacist control. Jewish power sees whites as a horse. The horse must obey and submit to the rider. If the horse gains independence and runs off, the rider loses a lot of advantage.

Taylor respects power and success, and Jews are powerful and successful. In contrast, Palestinians are poor, grubby, a bunch of 'losers'. But the fact is Jews don't regard whites as honorary fellow Jews but as the Other Palestinians, more dirty goyim to tame and control bu eviction and dehumanization. Whites have been rendered homeless in their own homeland. Globalism says white nations are no longer theirs. Gavin McInnes has been praising Jews, Jews, Jews, Israel, Israel, Israel forever just like Taylor. But he organized the Proud Boys that stood up to Antifa, the paramilitary thug force of Jewish power; and so, he was destroyed, and he's been deplatformed by everything.

Whites need to reject neo-nazi and KKK garbage -- Taylor deserves praise in having pushed that crowd away --, but they must candidly discuss Jewish power and its ultimate agenda. Twitter and Amazon's policies against Taylor will hopefully make scales fall from his eyes. His graciousness to Jews has been utterly useless. He has gained NOTHING. He has fared worse than Richard Spencer and David Duke who are still on Twitter.

Maybe Palestinians are a poor and grubby people, but it's about time whites understood their plight. Not because Palestinians are saints or glowing with nobility but because they've been denied the most basic right of humanity: Right of nationhood, territory, autonomy, the very things that Jewish Power is now denying to whites in white nations. Even in the fragments of remaining territory in West Bank, Palestinians are denied a nation-state of their own. Jewish caravans keep coming to take more land, to use up the water supply, to destroy Arab farms.
How is this any different from how Jewish Power in the US treats people like Taylor and other s who care about their own race and identity? Just like Zionists divert most of the water to Jewish settlers while making Palestinian farms go dry, Jewish Power in the US funnels most money and support to the Jewish Supremacism of AIPAC, ADL, and globo-homo agenda. While Jewish supremacists can rake in billions and be showered with billions more by US government, White Advocates can barely book a hotel for a conference, barely raise funds, and barely sell books online.
Amazon sells all the Neocon books by Jewish Supremacists responsible for 21st century wars that killed so many people. These neocons also recruited Neo-Nazis for a coup in Ukraine. Madeline Albright the Zionist Jewess said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi kids. Hillary and Obama are war criminals who destroyed Libya and used terrorists in Syria. Israel provided medical treatment to ISIS fighters and sent them back into Syria to wreck the place. There us so much evidence of Jewish supremacism, but Jews get everything because they are above criticism. But whites like Taylor get nothing. They are treated as pariahs or non-persons, just like Palestinians in West Bank.

Now, Taylor has supported the Zionist takeover of West Bank. Well, if Taylor supports Jewish illegal invasion of West Bank and scoffs at the plight of Palestinians who are denied basic nationhood, what moral legitimacy does he have in calling for national sovereignty of white nations? Also, if white people indulge and encourage bad Jewish behavior, who's to say Jews won't treat whites the same way? If you help Bob steal from Bill, will Bob be grateful and go easy on you? Or, having been emboldened by his criminality, will he come after your property next? Jews had the numbers to take over Palestine and remold it into a Jewish nation. Jews don't have the numbers to take over white nations, so they use non-white immigration-invasion to fill white nations with Diversity, allowing for Jewish divide-and-rule of fractured goyim. Also, massive race-mixing among goyim leads to loss of strong identity. All that race-mixing in Latin America robbed brown natives of a powerful sense of identity with which they could risen up against the white minority.

It is about time white people realized that "We are all Palestinians". As far as Jewish Power is concerned, white people are More Palestinians, and the West is just a huge West Bank. By realizing the truth, white people must, first and foremost, work towards White Liberation, White Emancipation, and White Independence. Only such will highlight the fact that the real supremacism in the US is Jewish and that white people are being denied the basic right of identity and interest. If Jews have a right to work for Jewish identity and interests, then European-Americans have every right to work for white identity and interests. How dare Jewish Tyranny deny this most basic right to whites. When Jews denounce identitarianism, it's not because they want ALL Peoples to give it up. Jews want whites to give up white identity so that they will serve Jewish identity instead. It's a case of 'heads I win, tails you lose'.

Whites must undermine Jewish Moral Narcissism and Megalomania. Jews gained advantage not only with the power of money but with the politics of morality. Via endless TV shows, books, movies, and etc, the Narrative made Jews out to be holy and blameless while whites were made to be the source of all evil in the world. To undermine Jewish Power, whites need to weaken its moralistic foundations. This doesn't mean whites should say the Shoah didn't happen or praise crazy Hitler. Rather, whites need to speak honestly and soberly of Jewish financial role in Western Imperialism, Jewish sales of opium to the Chinese, Jewish role in slave trade, Jewish role in communism, Jewish role in predatory capitalism in Germany of 20s and Russia of 90s, the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map, the ongoing Occupation of West Bank, and IDF death squads mowing down Palestinians who are denied right of nationhood. Jews advantaged their own power at the expense of white well-being by pushing a moralistic anti-white narrative. Whites must return the favor. White Liberationist movement must begin as a sober assessment of Jewish Power and History. It must reject the notion of Jewish holiness or purity. While many Jews did great things, many Jews did terrible things. Unless Jewish moral narcissism is knocked down a few pegs, Jews will lord over whites like they are gods or angels.

Also, it is no longer sufficient for white patriots to be for Free Speech. Not when the Enemy attacks Free Speech as 'hate speech' with crusading fervor. Sometimes, the best defense is to play offense. So, even as White Patriots defend their own free speech, they must morally attack Jewish Supremacist speech as the ultimate hate speech. Fight fire with fire. Denounce Zionism as hate speech against Palestinians. Denounce Amazon for selling books by hateful and murderous Neocon Jewish supremacists, like Madeline Albright who said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children. Denounce Amazon for selling books of the neo-imperialist Deep State. Denounce it for selling Hollywood movies that feature Muslims as subhuman terrorist-savages. Denounce it for selling movies that feature whites as neanderthal bigots and Christians as scum of the earth. Denounce Washington Post, Jeff Bezos' rag, as hate propaganda against Russia, Iran, Palestinians, white Americans, Christians, and patriots everywhere. Also, insist that Jews are undeserving of 'protected group' status since they are the ruling elites of the US, the lone superpower.

Just like Donald Trump took 'fake news' and threw it back at his enemies, whites must take the notion of 'hate speech', define it in their own way, and throw it back at Jewish supremacists and globohomo commissars. Whites need to support BDS as Justice Speech and denounce Zionism as 'hate speech'. Whites must condemn homomania as hateful speech against decency, health, and normality.

Granted, Jews are awful clever in how they SAY one thing but DO another. They will SAY they respect Islam and Arabs while DOING whatever necessary to wage more Wars for Israel that have laid waste to Muslim nations. They will SAY they stand for 'liberal democracy' while DOING everything to spread their hegemony of tribal oligarchy. Jews often practice Love Speech while carrying out Hate Acts. So, whites must expose this hypocrisy and judge reality by what is done than by what is said, and Jewish Power is the biggest hate-monger in the world today.

Commentary on "Is Google Biased?"

Is Google Biased?

http://www.unz.com/isteve/is-google-biased/

Of course Google is biased.

But the real problem is not so much that it is biased now as that it was UNBIASED(relatively speaking) at the beginning.

Google began with DON'T BE EVIL statement of principles. It claimed to be a fair, neutral, and unbiased arbiter of searches and information. THAT is why so many people signed onto Google and trusted it. That is why it got so big.

When Google's Israeli employees were caught messing with 'Pat B', Google fixed the problem. We were led to believe a few bad apples did it. It wasn't the official policy of Google.

http://www.unz.com/isteve/google-deunpersonizes-pat-buchanan/

If Google had candidly started out with a statement of its political biases and agendas, at least half of current users would have used another search engine. Google would never have grown into a monopoly IF it had openly declared its intentions at the outset.

Same with Paypal and Twitter. They got so big because it was understood by all that they would be un-ideological, unbiased, and neutral, fair to all. If either had started out by declaring Liberal or 'leftist' bias, many would have sought out another service or platform. They were supposed to be neutral-Libertarian.

Because these companies gained monopoly status only by having promised everyone neutrality and fairness, they must be attacked for deviating from their original intent.

Imagine if a closet-rightist Arab-American began Facebook with the idea that it would be fair and neutral to all. Suppose everyone signs up from far left to far right. But once Facebook becomes a giant monopoly, he says it's his company and he can do as he pleases and begins to shut down leftist pages and suppress Liberal news; he also shuts down Zionist pages and hires BDS to monitor for 'hate', most of which is identified with Jews and Israelis. The issue wouldn't simply be one of a private company doing what it wants. It would be about a monopoly reneging on the very promise that made it a monopoly in the first place. After all, many Zionists and their allies would never have signed up to the platform IF they knew from the beginning its ideological agendas and tribal biases.

Imagine if Zuckerberg began Facebook with a statement that it would favor Jews/Zionists over Palestinians and would be working with Jewish-controlled groups to censor or suppress pro-Palestinian, pro-Iranian, pro-white, and pro-Christian voices in favor of Zionists, homos/trannies, radical feminists, and black thug culture(of rap). Many people would have steered clear of Facebook, and many people would have gravitated to an alternative social network site, one that is conducive for conservatives. Zuckerberg is now working closely with Neocons to shut down 'hate'. Knowing neocons, we know that Wars for Israel aren't acts of hate BUT the Palestinian desire for liberation is 'hateful' and 'terroristic'.

These are not just private companies but monopolies, and they became monopolies because ALL OF US were sold on the idea that they would be fair to all sides. They lied to us. They pulled us all in with that false promise. Now that they got the power, they are using their monopoly position to favor certain views over others.

Also, when they invoke 'hate speech', they don't mean Zionist hatred against Palestinians, Iranians, and Syrians. They don't mean Jewish vitriol, paranoia, hysteria, and derangement syndrome about European patriots, American nationalists, Russians, and Hungarians.

It's gotten to the point where the Right should wage its own war on Hate Speech, that of Jews, homos, and black rappers/lunatics.
The problem is Free-Speech-Only is morally defensive. The Right is saying 'We defend ugly speech because of the Constitution.' It is legally sound but comes across as morally tainted. In the end, emotions can win over reason. The consecrated righteous can win over constitutional rights. Righteous are morally aggressive.
To fight fire with fire, the Right needs to identify Zionism, Homomania, radical feminism, and black thug culture as HATE and condemn them as spreaders of dementia and violence. And Diversity has to be associated with immigration-invasion and ethnic replacement. No one won a fight just by playing defense only.
Paypal denies service to Jared Taylor and Alex Jones for 'hate'. But George Soros and Zionist war-mongers(whose policies have turned millions of Muslims into refugees if not corpses) can rake in billions and use whatever payment platform they wish.

Shame Paypal for offering services to Zionist warmongers, Obama the war criminal who wasted Libya, Victoria Nuland the recruiter of Neo-Nazis in Ukraine, Albright the killer of 100,000s of Iraqi kids, Hillary Clinton the terrorist-loving butcher of Syria, the moguls who promote gangster rap, and etc. Paypal is Hatepal.

Another thing. This isn't primarily about ideology but about identity. It's a myth that Silicon Valley and Jewish globalists are 'leftist'. Jews and globalists use 'leftism' as a ruse to push agendas that are good for the Tribe. If anything, Jews and their globo-cucks HATE leftists who are consistent in their principles. Jeremy Corbyn and Norman Finkelstein, like them or not, are consistent and principled universal-leftists. Corbyn attacks ALL nationalisms, even that of Zionism. And Finkelstein believes the US should treat Jews and Palestinians equally. And guess what? Jewish Power hates them.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/07/28/labours-gas-chamber-blues-pink-berets-vs-fing-anti-semites/

Google pretends to be 'leftist' by hiring SJW nitwits to run funny doodles and hold anti-white-male struggle sessions. But this is all just for show. Notice it's always WHITE privilege but never JEWISH privilege that is condemned. Jewish elites are protecting Jewish Power by using 'white evil' as bogeyman. And all this Homomania is good for the Power Elite because vain homos serve the rich. And despite the tiresome PC slogans about Diversity, we know that Silicon Valley will be ruled by Jewish moguls, white execs, and Asian middle management and coders. Google Doodle is just a ruse, as are feel-good movies like HIDDEN FIGURES which gives the false impression that Hollywood Jews are really committed to black women running space programs.

Whenever people on the Right label globalists and Jewish elites as 'leftist', they are doing their enemies a favor. Globalist hegemonists and Jewish supremacists love being associated with the Left because it creates the impression that they are for the little guy, the downtrodden, the marginalized. The fact that homos and immigrant-helot-scabs than the native working class now define the 'Left' is proof that the Elites rigged the algorithm of Leftism to destroy True Leftism. If anything, today's Right(the real right, as opposed to cuckservatives) is more genuinely leftist in that it cares for the middle and working classes.

Also, the secret to Jewish Power was the use of left and right to serve Jewish identity. Jews make ideology serve identity. Without identity, ideology veers out of control. It's like without the sun, the planets will just fly off into space. Jewish rightism and Jewish leftism were given meaning, focus, and limits by the gravitational pull of Jewish identity.
Without an identity to serve, leftism becomes radical universalist nonsense.
Without an identity to serve, rightism becomes elite tyranny, like in the Age of Aristocrats when the elites looked down on the masses as mere serfs or cattle.
It is identity-as-covenant that makes the elites feel something for the people.
And it is identity that keeps leftism real. Leftism is good in championing the rights of the People. But which people? No ideology can serve All the people. Leftism works best in the national setting, as with the New Deal, Social Democracy in Northern Europe, and universal health care in Japan.
It is identity that humanizes the right(by making elites identify with the people) and keeps leftism real(by reminding the leftists that they should serve the nation than the world; the only reason Bolshevism survived was because Stalin opted for National Communism).

Because Jews have a strong identity, their leftism and rightism revolve around identity. Because whites now have a weak identity(unlike during the New Deal era), their leftism flies off the handle and obsesses over unrealistic things like 'endless refugees welcome' or 'Sweden as moral superpower must take in and save all of Africa and Afghanistan'.
Or their rightism turns into Ayn-Randian libertarian obsession with the successful, rich, and powerful with NO feeling for the white masses.
In the end, Chinese identity saved China from Mao's ideological madness. Even the nutty Chairman scaled back the Cultural Revolution because he grew worried about escalating Sino-Soviet tensions. Needs of national identity trumped ideological purism.

What Jews fear most is not white leftism or white rightism. They know white leftism will be too much about 'save the world' or 'worship the homo' to ever be about white unity. And they know that white rightism will be too much about 'muh money' and 'muh success' to be about unity of white elites and white masses. Paul Ryan the 'far right libertarian' only cares about the Koch brothers, not the white working class that is dying of opioids. What Jews fear most is white left-rightism. The unity. They call it 'fascist'. I call it 'neo-fascist'. But that is the secret to Jewish Power. Jewishism has always been quasi-fascist.

Finally, Jews pretending to be a Victim Group is as ludicrous as White Hispanics pretending to be People of Color. White Hispanics held tyrannical power over POC in Latin America forever, but now, they continue to hold elite positions in the US as the voice of the Hispanic Community BUT as members of POC. White Hispanics oppressed and raped browns forever in Latin America, but they dominate the Hispanic Community in the US in the name of the browns.
It can't get any lower than that. Well maybe not. Paul Ryan denigrating white identity(97% of him) but celebrating the 3% of him that is Jewish is even lower in character. Such a total cuck to Jewish moguls and oligarchs.

Google, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, and etc. became MONOPOLIES on the basis of Neutrality and Fairness. Therefore, They have No Justification to now Censor People and Deny Service on the basis of Identity + Ideology.

Some argue that Google, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, and other Internet Monopolies have the right to censor or deny services to just about anyone because they are private companies. But this argument is utterly bogus. They are not merely companies but monopolies, and furthermore, they got to be so HUGE because they offered their products and services to all of us with the promise of fairness, integrity, and neutrality. After all, Google’s motto used to be "Don’t do evil". Now, ‘evil’ is a vague term, but the general understanding was that Google would not rig the system to favor certain interests over others. It would play the role of a fair arbiter and referee. As for Twitter, it expanded worldwide because of its stated commitment to Free Speech. It presented itself as a forum providing free exchange of ideas even for those living in repressive un-democratic nations. And Paypal had no stated ideological agendas. It offered payment processing services to people around the world. And it is precisely for those reasons that so many people of all identities and ideologies signed up to use their services. It was on the assumption that the companies would act fairly and without favor to any one particular group. Would any of them have become the behemoths they are now IF, in their incarnations, they'd stated their long-term ideological and tribal goals outright? No, many people would have refused their services and gravitated toward other alternative platforms. Why would so many people have signed up for services and products by companies that pledge to push agendas against their kind? For example, if Twitter had stated from the very beginning that it would favor globalists, Zionists, the Deep State, anti-white cretins, nasty blacks, homosexuals & trannies, crazed feminists, and the like WHILE targeting conservatives, moral people, white folks, Palestinians, race-realists, Christians, pro-family people, patriots, nationalists, and etc for shadow-banning, censorship, and blacklisting, countless millions of people would never have signed up with Twitter. People of all ideological convictions signed up to Twitter because the word was that Twitter does not play favorites: It lives by principles, integrity, and basic sense of fairness. It doesn’t favor agendas by ideology or identity EVEN IF most Twitter employees happen to lean in a particular way politically. Our understanding was that Twitter employees' politics would be a personal matter and not affect their professionalism as maintainers of a social platform committed to Free Speech.

All these companies didn’t gain prominence simply by appealing to one side of the ideological spectrum or favoring one identity over another. Google didn’t start out by saying, "Our system will favor Progs over Conservatives, globalists over nationalists, Zionists over Palestinians, homos & trannies over natural-normal decent folks." If it had been forthright about its long-term political and cultural agenda, there is no doubt that most peoples disfavored by Google Jews would never have used the service, thereby preventing its becoming a Search Engine Monopoly around the world hogging over 85% of the traffic. Google got BIG on the promise and pledge of neutrality and fairness. People signed up and used the service because they thought they could trust Google to stick to its pledge of "Don’t be evil."
Imagine if Paypal had stated in its startup phase that it would favor certain identities and ideologies while denying service to a whole spectrum of identities and ideologies, especially those related to Palestinian causes, white identity, and Natural Morality, the kind that believes it makes zero sense to celebrate homo fecal penetration & tranny penis-cutting. Many people would have thought twice about signing up for Paypal. The success of all those companies(even to the point of becoming global monopolies) depended on their ideological neutrality. Imagine if Paypal had been started up by a bunch of white nationalist-patriots who sympathize with Palestinians, and suppose their stated purpose for the company was to favor white patriots, Palestinians, pro-family people, and Christians while denying service to a host of Zionist figures(on the basis of Jewish Hate and Tyranny against Palestinians), radical feminists, Deep State globalists(for their wanton destruction of the Middle East via Wars for Israel), and homo-tranny radicals(for spreading degeneration and perversion as hate propaganda against morality and normality). If such had been the stated principles of the company, then we know that many people would not have signed up for Paypal because its values and agenda offend them. Even moderate Liberals and Progressives might not have signed up(even if they wouldn’t have been denied service) because they find the notion of a company censoring or denying service to their ideological allies to be offensive. Indeed, if a white-nationalist-patriot-run Paypal had hidden its long-term agenda and persuaded countless millions to sign up to its service on the promise of ideological neutrality, then it would have a responsibility to stick to those principles. After all, the ONLY reason why so many people signed up was on the basis that the company has no ideological bias.
Now, suppose this white-nationalist-patriot Paypal grew super-huge into a monopoly by pretending to be ideologically unbiased but, upon gaining near-total-dominance, decided to purge a whole bunch of people deemed to be Zionist haters, globalist-imperialists, homo-tranny degenerates, radical feminists, and etc. Even if most moderate Liberals and Progressives are not denied service, wouldn’t they feel cheated that they’d been led to sign up on the premise of the company's ideological neutrality? Their memberships made the company a dominant player in global business, but suddenly, the company targets many people on the ‘leftist’ side of the spectrum. And Jewish members are left wondering why Zionists are being especially targeted for ‘hate speech’ when Palestinian anti-Zionist 'hate speech' is not only allowed by endorsed.

In retrospect, all these companies became behemoths and monopolies via false advertising. They couldn’t have become so big if they’d stated their ideological biases in their start-up phase. After all, if a company says it will go out of its way to favor ONE side while discriminating against the OTHER, then people on the Other side will support another company that especially caters to them. If a hamburger chain opens with the express ideological statement against conservatives, then most conservatives will not patronize the place. They will look for another chain that caters especially to conservatives and works against liberals. The reason why certain businesses got so big is that they claimed to be ideologically neutral and unbiased. Thus, they pulled customers from the entire ideological spectrum and from all identities. McDonalds and Walmart didn’t start out by saying they’ll favor certain kind of customers with particular ideological views while disfavoring other kinds of customers. The understanding was that, regardless of your identity or ideology, if you order their products, you will be treated well as a customer. If either company had started out with a stated ideological bias, it would have alienated tons of customers.
Now, imagine if Walmart, upon gaining retail supremacy, declares that it will treat customers with certain ideological bias better than other customers. So, certain customers will get discounts and special deals while other kinds of customers will be over-charged or banned from stores. That would be pretty lousy, wouldn’t it, especially since the company got SO BIG by having led all Americans into believing that it’s a fair and neutral retail outlet for ALL customers.

Same logic applies to the Internet Monopolies. They got so big because they promised neutrality, fairness, and lack of bias. Google didn’t start out saying that its search engines will favor globalists over nationalist, progs over conservatives, homos & trannies over natural-normal folks, and etc. When it turned out that some Jews in Israel rigged the engine to hide Pat Buchanan from search recommendations, Google quickly fixed the problem. So, we were led to be believe that, while there were some bad apples at Google, the top management was committed to fairness and neutrality. But now, we know that the rottenest apples are at the very top of Google. Indeed, the Google Jews fooled us into believing that they have integrity & principle and would not stoop so low to rig the algorithms to favor their agenda. If insider-trading is illegal, why isn’t insider-algorithm-rigging illegal, especially when Google search results affect the lives of countless peoples around the world? There was a time when Google started out as a little guy, and perhaps, it did identify with the upstarts, mavericks, rebels, and the like. But once Google became one of the biggest companies in the world, its CEO’s and oligarchs identified with the Deep State, Establishment, Globo-Homo Hegemony, and Zionist Tyranny. But then, even when they were starting at the ‘bottom’, Google Jews were elitists with connections with some of the most powerful people in America and the world. And given their tribal links with Israelis who oppress Palestinians, for how long could Google be equally fair to Jews and Palestinians? The history of the Google Doodle illustrates how the company became increasingly more ideological and tribal. It became ever more Jewish-supremacist, and its ideology was the globo-homo kind meant to subvert and undermine the cultures and values of all goy nations. (The fact that Google and other Jew-dominated companies are not really leftist can be seen in the fact that Google Doodles never celebrate Palestinian heroes and martyrs. And given that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of the Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map, you’d think Google would do *something* to honor the tragedy of the powerless and helpless Palestinians. Aren’t leftists supposed to care for the underdog, the downtrodden, and wretched of the earth? If Google is really leftist, where is its concern for Palestinians? Name one doodle in honor in Yasser Arafat or for the brave Palestinian children who took part in the Intifada. And if Google is really leftist, why hasn’t it condemned the globalist imperialist Wars for Israel that turned the Middle East upside down? Why no Google Doodle to commemorate all the Muslims or Arabs[many of them Christian] maimed or killed by these Zionist-made wars? Google, like so many Jews, are only faux-leftists. They don’t care about the downtrodden, the poor, and the wretched of the earth. They only care about wealth, privilege, power, and monopoly, mostly to be concentrated in Jewish hands.
Jews are tribal supremacists who invoke symbolic ideology to appear ‘progressive’, which in our time, mainly means worship of homos and trannies, a practice that only goes to help the rich and powerful since the vain & narcissistic homos and trannies love to cater to the wealthy and powerful.)

The Jewish Factor is all-important in the understanding of how these internet giants operate. The rigged game isn’t only about ideology. It’s not really about Left vs Right. With Jews, it’s all about manipulating ideology to serve identity. Jews hide behind ‘leftism’ to give the impression that they are for ‘social justice’ and the ‘little guy’. In fact, they are for the minority elite supremacists, namely themselves. Jews promote ‘leftism’ to encourage the gentile majority to turn against itself. Jews want whites to be ‘leftist’ in siding with non-whites(and Jews) against white patriots. It’s classic divide-and-rule strategy. These white ‘leftists’ are never supposed to notice that Jews got the Real Power. Consider Michael Moore who makes so much noise about Big Money but never says anything about Jews. He’s a useful tool for the Tribe. Even when Neocon Jews were instigating 9/11, Moore only went after Bush and Big Oil when, in fact, it was the Big Jew, not Big Oil, that clamored for Wars for Israel. The clearest indication that Jews support ‘leftist’ ideology only as a ploy can be seen in the case of Jeremy Corbyn. Like him or not, Corbyn takes his leftism more seriously than others. He sees the world in terms of the lowly masses(of all the world) vs the elites. So, he naturally sides with brown Arabs and Palestinians against Jewish bankers and elites. So, how have so-called Jewish ‘leftists’ responded to this? With favor and sympathy? No, with utmost vitriol. You see, ‘leftism’ is wonderful when Jews can use it to ideologically divide whites into two camps at each other’s throats. But, when it is used more sincerely and consistently, as when white leftists ally with brown masses against Jewish elites(who control the Anglo cuck-collaborator elites), Jews flip out and foam at the mouth.
This is why people who call Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Paypal ‘leftist’ are really doing a favor to the Jewish Oligarchs of Big Tech. It makes rich and powerful Jews sigh with relief. It gives the false impression that Silicon Valley is run by people who really care about the downtrodden, the less privileged, and the marginalized. That is, of course, a total myth. Silicon Valley is run by super-rich Jewish supremacists who fully support the Deep State, the Warfare state, Wall Street financial gangsterism, the ‘new cold war’ with Russia, the strangulation of Iran, Homomania(the quasi-religious cult of globalism), and the Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. These Jews work with cuck-white-collaborators and with Asian-Indian elites(some of whom are oligarchs themselves) who are totally obsessed with money, power, and privilege. By hiring some publicity clowns to make ‘progressive’-seeming doodles or gestures, companies like Google manufacture the impression that it’s all about the ‘little guy’ or the ‘oppressed’. It’s about as convincing as the aristocratic elites of Old Europe feigning humility and piety via Christian rituals ostensibly about atonement and sacrifice. (How sincerely spiritual was Michael Corleone when he stood in the Church as godfather for the child whose father he was plotting to kill? Jewish elites use 'leftism' like the Mafia used the Catholic Church. As moral perfume to mask the stench of power.)

In fact, the only thing most aristocrats ever cared about was their own vanity, privilege, and power. Power eventually comes to obsess over itself. We saw this with communist elites who gradually turned into the new Power Elites whose main objective was to maintain power for its own sake. Behind the symbolism and chorus of righteousness, everything turns ‘fascist’. Look what happened to the once idealistic boomer generation. They became the Clintons. They became the likes of Joe Biden and John Kerry, once an anti-war activist but ultimately just another operative of the Deep State using American Power in a game of neo-imperialist hegemony.

This is why the current censorship makes no sense purely from an ideological viewpoint. After all, most of the Real Left sympathizes with the Palestinians against Zionist Occupiers. And yet, the behavior of Google, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, and etc. are all geared to favor Zionists and Jewish supremacists. Members of BDS that tried to highlight the 70th anniversary of the Nakba pogroms were banned from Twitter.

Much of Google is operated from Israel, and those working on the algorithms are nasty vicious Zionist Jews. Facebook is working with Neocon warmongers to shut down ‘hate speech’. Now, any honest person would say the most consequentially hateful speech is Zionist Imperialism. In its name, an entire people have been ethnically cleansed, humiliated, brutalized, occupied, and periodically killed in escalations of violence. And in the name of securing the supremacy of Israel, Zionists in the US have hatched one crazy war plot after another resulting in ruined nations all across Middle East and North Africa. And if Jews don’t destroy nations with US and Israel bombs, it is with financial strangulation. Since the US controls much of Asia and EU, nations like Japan, Germany, UK, and France do like the US tells them to. And since Jews run the US, most of the advanced world is about serving Jews. And even nations like Russia and China that have sovereignty are affected by this Jewish supremacist power because they rely on world trade dominated by the US that is dominated by Jews.

We need to identify and label Jewish power properly. Calling it ‘leftist’ does it too much credit, and indeed, that is exactly what Jews want. The concept of the ‘Alt Right’ was flawed in that it too saw the world in terms of right vs left. In fact, a people need both leftism and rightism. This is the necessary truth of neo-fascism. Indeed, such is the formula for Jewish success. Jews don’t divide themselves into Jewish Left against Jewish Right and vice versa. No, the secret of Zionism was meaningfully integrating Jewish nationalism with socialism and capitalism. Only stupid children see the world in terms of black-and-white. This was the great promise of Fascism, but Mussolini and Hitler failed in the first round because of the Cult of Personality and Imperialism. And this is also why Zionism has failed morally. Had it been merely a nationalist phenomenon, it would have made political and moral sense. But, it turned imperialist, megalomaniacal-supremacist, and pathological in its hegemonic ambitions. Jews have become the New Nazis, or Judeo-Nazis. When people like Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson, Nicholas Fuentes, James Allsup, Richard Spencer, Ann Coulter, Tucker Carlson, and the rest of them refer to Big Tech as ‘leftist’, the Silicon Valley Jew-oligarchs are loving it and laughing their asses off. Here they are, playing the Power Game of supremacy as Tribal Jewish Hegemonists, and a bunch of Alt-Right, Alt-Lite, and Conservative types are calling them ‘leftists’, creating the impression that all those super-rich psychopathic Jewish supremacists who aid-and-abet in the ruthless tyranny over Palestinians are a bunch of naive do-gooders whose hearts melt at ‘little people’. If anything, many in the Alt Right are far more leftist(in the genuine sense) than Jewish globalists are.
The trick is to avoid something as extreme as communism. We don’t need pure leftism, just like we don’t need pure rightism. We need a healthy combination of Left and Right. Left-Right, not ‘Alt Right’, is the real formula for truth, justice, and success. Without Rightism, leftism has no focus or gravity. No ideology can be totally universal and about ALL people. It’s difficult enough to manage, protect, and preserve your own nation. Imagine if your people had to take care of three or four nations. Next, imagine if your people had to take care of all the world. Swedes are discovering how stupid their ‘moral superpower’ posturing really is. Not only is it naive and silly, it’s arrogant and closet-supremacist. Swedes seem to believe that they must take care of other nations and peoples because most of the world is incapable of doing so on its own. It’s as if Swedes are overly qualified to manage their own nation only with its small population. With their surplus energy and talent, they should take care of Africa and Middle East too. Now, it’s not a bad thing to lend help to less fortunate or capable peoples. But it’s a mad sign of hubris to believe that one’s own people could play moral superman to the world. This is why Leftism must revolve around a Rightist Core. That way, the idealism of leftism has a specific gravity and purpose. Just like Leftism needs a rightist gravitational core, Rightism needs leftist expansiveness. Imagine a society where the ruling elites only care about their own power, privilege, and prestige. Suppose they snub and look down on the masses as dirty, ignorant, and worthless. Aristocrats treated serfs in such manner. And today, Jewish supremacist elites have ordered their white cuck-collaborate elites to look upon the white masses in the same way: As Trash. This is why Jews are faux-leftists. They don’t care about the white masses. Jews fear that a left-right unity among white elites and white masses(as during the New Deal and Eisenhower Era) will weaken white goy-elites servitude to Jews. Jews want white elites to serve Jews, not to lead and represent the white people. Jews want white elites to be ‘rightist’ or ‘leftist’ but not left-right.
If white elites are totally ‘rightist’(or libertarian, self-centered, and greedy), then they will become like GOP cucks who don’t have the trust or support of white people. What white person respects that turd Paul Ryan who only shills for the Koch Brothers and Israel?
If white elites were totally ‘leftist’, they will be too busy attacking any sign of white success and wealth to forge a unity between white elites and white masses. This is why white ‘socialist’ types just don’t get it. By hating on all vestiges of wealth, they don’t think to forge a unity of white mind and white body. White ‘right’-libertarians can be found in Congress and think-tanks. White ‘left’-socialists can be found in academia and bunch of organizations. Because they lack a sense of racial consciousness(something that existed even in FDR’s time), they judge everything ideologically or just cynically suck up to Power.

In contrast, because Jews do have a strong tribal sense, their leftism and rightism can be shaped to serve something deeper than ideology: Identity. It is Jewish identity that serves as the gravitational pull to their ideological inclinations. Identity is real and concrete. A Jewish people really exist, and they want territory and power; and they have a history. Abstractions must serve something tangible and real. Even with their religion, Jews used the Covenant to partially reverse man’s servitude to God. Without the Covenant, the abstract God is at the center, and Jews must serve Him and His abstract, cosmic, and universal Truth. Since God is the Lord of all that is, Jews would feel compelled to serve OTHER peoples as the children of God. But the Covenant makes God ‘serve’ the Jews as the Chosen People. The Covenant serves as a contract between God and Jews. Jews are to honor and glorify His greatness, and in turn, He is to favor and support the Jews over all other peoples and their gods and cults.
The problem with Christianity is there is no specific covenant between God and Christians. Though Jesus’ promise is considered the New Covenant, it is too universal and pervasive to have a meaningful purpose, at least since the West has spread the Gospel all over the world. When Western Power was limited to Europe, Christianity did serve as a defacto ‘white’ religion, especially as European Christians were at war with mighty Arabs, North Africa, and Turkic Muslims. Back then, Christian Europe was not richer nor more powerful than other parts of the world. There seemed little likelihood that Europe would dominate the world and spread Christianity to other peoples. But as the West did begin to expand and conquer other lands, Christianity gradually transformed from a European/white religion and faith to a universal faith. Thus, it lost the defacto quasi-covenant feature it once had for Europeans. When Jews conquer a people like the Palestinians, the last thing they try to do is convert them to Jewishness. The Covenant is between God and the Jews. It is not to be shared with non-Jews. Thus, the core principles of Jewishness work against Conversion. Even Reform Judaism that allows conversion does so without enthusiasm and with reluctance. It allows conversion but doesn’t encourage it. In contrast, the core principle of Christianity is conversion. After all, Europe itself went from Paganism to Christianity via massive conversion. That Christianity was defacto a European religion for so long was due to an accident of history. Until the rise of modernity, Europe simply didn’t have the means to conquer and dominate other peoples. If anything, it came close to being invaded by others such as Moors, Mongols, and the Turks. But once Europeans gained dominance around the world, the core principle of Christianity awoke in a spectacular way and mass conversions were planned for non-white subjects. Indeed, white Christian masters converted black slaves to Christianity. Despite social differences between whites and blacks, whites were willing to turn blacks into the spiritual equals of whites. And given what Jesus stood for, black slaves were bound to be favored by Christian sentimentality, which explains the rise of Abolitionism driven by religious fury.
In contrast, Jewish slave-owners in the South never dreamed of turning their black slaves into fellow Jews, no more than any Jew in Israel wants to convert Palestinians and Arabs into New Jewish Brothers. For Jews, the Tribe and goyim are different in both body and soul. In contrast, white Christian masters, even as they separated white bodies from black bodies, preached a Gospel that said whites and blacks were at least united in spirit and the love of Christian God and Jesus. This may be seen as the noble element of Christianity, but as the Faith takes in more and more converts from all over the world, its meaning and spirit becomes ever more abstract and confused because they have to cater to just about all peoples whose identities, appearances, customs, histories, values, and group-personalities are so different. And look at the Catholic Church today. It is a hodgepodge of confusion, with a globo-homo cuck-pope presiding over Africans, Asians, and the Third World. As for Mainline Protestantism, what the hell is that nowadays? On the one hand, it’s supposed to be about saving all the world, and yet its main obsession is Homomania that is the darling cult of over-privileged-and-pampered urban elites.

What goes for religion goes for ideology. After all, religions are spiritual ideologies. Unless a faith is connected to something specific and tangible, it grows bigger and bigger. It seems to be growing in power but actually grows diffuse and diluted as it has to appeal to more and more peoples who are so much at odds in tangible matters. This is why even universal-seeming ideologies work best only in specified settings. ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’ is a good universal principle, but it’s best if Turks enforce it among themselves. We don’t want Turkish police and courts to be responsible to law-and-order all around the world. And I doubt if Turks want the responsibility either. Then, how stupid for the US to be the ‘policeman of the world’. Worse, given that the US is ruled by nasty vicious Jews, its foreign policy is usually that of a gangster even as it pretends to be the defender of ‘human rights’ and ‘liberal democratic’ values in five continents. While it’s good for nations to share ideas and advise other nations against doing evil, most peoples are best off when they mind their own business. It’s like the Sun warms all the planet, but each people use the sunlight to grow food on their land. Solar-based agriculture is a universal practice wherever there is soil, but each nation has its own national farms. Drinking water is also universal, but that doesn’t mean the US should supply water to all the world or that the whole world must come to the US for water. Education is a universal ideal, but each nation has its own obligation to educate their national folks. It’s not up to the US to educate the world. Besides, these days, US academic influence means spreading Homomania, Afromania, and Shoah-Worship to all nations. Outside hard sciences, so much of US academia and media have gotten utterly decadent and corrupt due to Jewish and Homo influence.

Anyway, Big-Tech got to be monopolies by drawing users from the entire spectrum of ideological allegiances. If the intent of Big Tech companies such as Google, Twitter, and Facebook was to rig the algorithm and manipulate results to favor ONE side over another, it should have made known from the beginning. Then, many on the Right would have sought alternative platforms. Indeed, the reason why a social platform site like Gab was a late-comer to the game was because it was unnecessary when Twitter more or less remained true to the principles of Free Speech and allowing views from all sides. Even Andrew Torba surely thought something like Gab would have been pointless a few years ago. Why offer a Free Speech platform when Twitter was being fair and allowing views all across the ideological spectrum? But ever since Donald Trump won, Jewish Wall Street has been tempting Jack Dorsey with investment and higher stock prices IF he would allow Zionist supremacist groups like ADL to monitor for ‘hate’, which means whatever Jewish Supremacists don’t like. The main targets have been those who mock Jewish tyranny, call for white emancipation from Jewish supremacism, and espouse pro-Palestinian causes. Jews even spread the lie that the most effective pro-Trump voices, such as that of ‘Ricky Vaughn’, were Russian agents. At least Joe McCarthy was right about the existence of a vast web of Soviet spies in postwar US government agencies. All this stuff about Russia has been made of whole cloth by Jews who simply cannot stand a fair fight.
Too many Jews act dirty. They fixed baseball games and boxing matches in the past. They use media and money to make sure that US foreign policy is rigged in favor of Zionist supremacist imperialists than of Palestinians who are oppressed, murdered, and terrorized. Jews are without character and principles. Because of their verbal IQ, they are very adept at making themselves sound intellectual and sophisticated, but it’s mostly sophistry,a dirty game of power and control to fool us. The fact is Jews simply cannot stand anything that goes against their own power and agenda. So, the Jewish idea of ‘liberal democracy’ is only one where the masses vote in the way that Jews want. Rule by Jewish oligarchy and elites is ‘liberal democracy’ according to Jews. If the masses vote against Jewish globo-elite wishes, it’s called ‘populism’. According to Jews, people are good only when they obey Jewish elites. Jewish elitism = Liberal Democracy. If the people think on their own and vote for their needs and against Jewish agenda, it’s demeaned as ‘populism’. Jews hate ‘populism’ because it is a call by the goy masses upon goy elites to lead them. Jews want goy elites to serve Jewish-super-elites, just like British or French Imperialists wanted local non-white elites of the empire to serve the Imperial overlords than their own native folks. The imperialists wanted comprador elites than comrade elites. Comprador elites collaborated with the Imperialist overlords whereas the comrade elites sided with the native masses against the imperialists. Today, Jewish globo-homo supremacist elites rule the West, and there is nothing they fear more than the unity of white elites and white masses. Jews think, "How dare those white elites represent and defend their own people than serve us Jewish masters!"

It is time all good Americans denounced the Big Lie of the Big Tech companies. They got to be monopolies because of the participation of everyone, and everyone participated in their services and products because of the understanding that Big Tech companies will be fair and neutral. If Big Tech had made their ideological agenda known from the beginning, they would have missed out on tons of customers and users because countless people would have been outraged and offended by the agenda. Imagine if Twitter got started by having made its ideological biases and pro-Zionist tribal agenda well-known. Then, something like Gab would have been viable as it would have offered a truly Free Speech platform. But Twitter was dishonest. It promoted itself as a Free Speech platform and drew in users from all over the world and all across the ideological spectrum. And with such promise, it became a monopoly. But with its great power and influence(made possible by promise of Free Speech), it is now rigging the system to favor one identity, Jewish supremacism, above all others and favoring globo-homo ideology over other views. According to current Twitter(and Facebook) policy, someone who says that real sex only happens between man and woman is accused of ‘hate speech’ against Homomaniacs who celebrate man-to-man fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting. We must never criticize perversion and degeneracy, especially the kind favored by Jewish Globalists. Twitter will even allow Jewish-controlled porn that feature white women as sex meat and cumbuckets to be traded and sold by Jewish adult-entertainment industry moguls. But if you’re a decent traditional person or a good Christian who is off-put by homo fecal penetration and say so, you will be suspended and eventually deleted.

Now, if Twitter weren’t a monopoly, it wouldn’t matter. If it was just one among many social platforms offering its kind of services, those banned by Twitter can go to another platform. The problem is Twitter is virtually a monopoly, and it got to be such because of its false promise of Free Speech to all sides. That was why other similarly-conceived companies couldn’t compete with it. What’s the point of creating another Free Speech platform when Twitter was just that? It would have been redundant. And because of its reputation for free speech and neutrality, so many people signed up and made Twitter a total monopoly. If Twitter had been honest about its intentions from the beginning, an alternative platform would have been viable because people would have known from the outset that Twitter is a pro-Zionist, pro-Globo-Homo, anti-white, and anti-Palestinian platform. A company like Gab would have had a chance and would have grown(even bigger than Twitter) if people years ago knew that Twitter would not allow Free Speech. (Of course, Twitter is totally erratic in its regulation of ‘hate speech’. It bans Jared Taylor but allows David Duke, a figure who is far more extreme than Taylor. Why? Precisely because Taylor is an especially intelligent and rational voice on the Right about race, intelligence, and other matters. ADL that gives orders to that pathetic cuck Jack Dorsey simply cannot stand a man like Jared Taylor. ADL would prefer if most people associated White Interests with David Duke who is forever denigrated for his KKK past.
To be sure, Taylor’s one big failure is his loyalty to Jewish Power despite the fact that Jews are his main persecutors. When will Jared Taylor wake up and understand, as does Kevin MacDonald, that it’s hopeless with most Jews. Sure, there will be some Jews who do have principles and will do what’s right. But most Jews have no qualms about playing a dirty game to get what THEY want. Jews developed as merchants whose main objective was profit. They weren’t shaped by the ethos of noblemen who, despite their exploitative nature, had a sense of honor and pride. Jews are essentially fixers than fitters. Not to be trusted. And their influence is deeply corrupting. Their control over the white cuck-elites have turned even people of Northern European stock into pathetic dogs like John McCain and Ben Sasse, gutless and spineless toadies who suck up to Jewish supremacist power but pretend they are helping a poor helpless ‘survivors of the Holocaust’. From a cosmic perspective, it’s all very funny. Unfortunately, we don’t live in cosmic dimensions as gods do but in the human world where we all suffer from the sheer rottenness of the Tribe.