Democracy. From People-Replacing-Bad-Elites to Elites-Replacing-'Bad'-People.

The new 'vibrant' Paris

Most Western democracies are now oligarchies controlled by Jewish globalists and their cuck-collaborators.

If American Democracy had truly been responsive to the people, it wouldn't have allowed massive invasions from the Third World. To be sure, if white Americans in the 60s had been more mindful of elite agendas than so resigned to complacency and leisure, they might have read the writings on the wall and taken steps to prevent their ethno-demographic demise.

As it happens, politicians rely on money from big donors. So, even though they’re elected by votes of many little fishes, they do the bidding of few globalist whales. Furthermore, the little fishes can only choose from candidates handpicked by the whales.

When leaders and elites are bad, they should be removed by democratic process. That’s how true democracy should work.
But in the Current West, the opposite has been happening under the New Democracy.
Whore-politicians and entrenched deep state managerial class, in coordination with media and academia run by shills of globalism, work to replace the masses with New People, the invasive immigrant-colonizers. Replacism is the name of the game. As whiteness has been associated with evil and wickedness, white majority in European and white-made nations are seen as 'bad' or 'deplorable'. The only good white people are those who welcome replacement by non-whites. White people who want to keep white nations white are 'bad'. Anti-white whites are 'good', pro-white whites are 'bad'. So, if in the past, American democracy was about white people replacing bad leaders with good ones, today it's about 'good' globalist 'progressives' working to replace 'bad' white people with good non-whites.

Just ponder the full implication of this madness. Democracy is supposed to be about the people replacing bad leaders, but now it's about the entrenched elites replacing entire peoples. In a sane world, the people should replace elites than elites replace people. After all, the former is so much easier and more elegant to pull off. In contrast, replacing entire populations with new ones is a massive undertaking that turns the world upside down.
Wouldn't it be better(and so much easier) for Germans to replace Merkel & her ilk than for the latter to replace Germans with masses of 'New Germans'?
'Demo' in 'democracy' means the people. So, Democracy means rule by the people. But New Democracy is a demo-clashy where the existing people are made to clash with new ones who eventually take over. Jewish globalist elites use the demo-dialectics to bring about the synthesis of 'New Americans' who, having no clear identity and roots in America, can easily be manipulated and controlled by fashions of the Current Year. Diversity will turn whites into cucks indoctrinated with 'white guilt'. They will regard most of White History as tainted and redeemable only by Diversity and cuckery. And non-white hordes as 'New Americans' will feel no allegiance or appreciation of White American Heritage.

As inequality grows and more power/wealth amasses at the top, the elites now have the power to replace the people than the people have the power to replace the elites.

Worst of all, because virtually everyone is educated and entertained by media and schools controlled by globalist agenda, even the white masses have come to welcome their replacement as the greatest goal of freedom, democracy, and 'western values'. Consider all those white people who voted for globalism with sincere conviction that the Great Replacement is a moral imperative of the white race.

Politically Correct Powers-that-be Project their own Cultism on the Anti-Cultist Jordan Peterson

Whatever one thinks of Jordan Peterson, whether one agrees with him or not, he came to prominence by speaking out as a genuine liberal(as opposed to the Liberal Dogmatist) against the various cults of Political Correctness that have gripped the college campuses and media. Much of modern academia operates not by open discourse, honest debate, and free speech but by dogmas, taboos, slogans(chanted with mantra-like fervor), pseudo-intellectual concepts(like micro-aggressions and triggering), and demotions-firings-and-blacklisting.
Current PC insists it has all the answers and is on the side of angels. There is no need for discussion or disagreement since the latest New Normal is always correct. Skepticism for the New Normal must be denounced as a bad thought or ‘hate speech’. And humor must be discouraged, even banned, when it comes to the sanctimony of the New Normal, such as the notion that Bruce Jenner is now ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner and deserving to be celebrated as ‘Woman of the Year’.

A true democracy is one where people are free to disagree based on honest differences of interests, values, and opinions. It is through free and open discourse that better ideas gain more traction and influence over inferior ones. If some ideas and values are deemed sacrosanct and protected & propagandized above all others, they didn't win their prestige and influence by honest means but through the ideological corruption of Political Correctness.

A truly worthy academia is one where ideas are constantly open to civil discussion and honest debate based on facts, logic, and admittance of competing interests. Even if biases are ineradicable, people must be honest about their existence among all groups. (If white power/privilege exists, then so can other forms of power/privilege, such as that of Jews, but notice that Jews are averse to honest discussion of their immense power and privilege. Indeed, PC has become essentially a tool of Jews to distract gentiles into blaming mostly whites so that whites will be burdened with guilt that nullifies their sense of pride. Without pride, whites will be morally paralyzed and seek redemption by serving other peoples. But then, devious Jews want whites to serve Jews than serve all of humanity equally, which is why Jews insist that all American politicians support Zionist Israel over Palestinians and pass laws to criminalize BDS.)

In the hard sciences, it is honest and open methodology that replaces flawed theories and practices with truer ones. In the humanities and social sciences where there is no single truth, openness of debate and discussion IS the key to the curriculum. After all, the many great philosophers of the West and the Rest all came to different conclusions. And yet, each also arrived at some kind of truth from his own angle of experience, awareness, and imagination. If we apply the logic of PC to philosophy, only one theory should be chosen above all others that should either be banned or suppressed. The reason why Jordan Peterson dislikes Marxism-Leninism has less to do with its flaws & misconceptions that its insistence that it was the one-and-only truth with the historical right to banish all other competing ideas. Such monomania makes it impossible to fix the flaws of a system when those flaws must be hailed as essential and inviolable. It’s no wonder that communist nations were marked by totalitarian conformity, repression, and stagnation. People were not allowed to speak freely about the false premises and systemic problems of the system.
Likewise, the 'strange death of Europe', as examined by Douglas Murray, owes to PC that has forbidden generations of Europeans to sound the alarm about the dangers of Jewish power, American Neo-imperialism, Pop culture degeneracy, Mania for Diversity, and pathological white-self-loathing. The equivalent would be a doctor who cannot tell the patient that the latter is dying from cancer. Or a doctor who can diagnose the cancer but only provide useless or harmful treatments for the disease. If the doctor isn't allowed to identify the cancer, how can it be treated? It's hardly better if the doctor is coerced by the Medical Authority to offer carcinogens as the cure for cancer. Europe is dying from Diversity and white self-loathing, but PC pushes those as the cure. As the vile Jewish supremacist Barbra Specter has said, "Europe cannot survive without multiculturalism." That's like saying a cage of gerbils cannot survive without the invasion by rats.
Of course, the problem isn't only Orwellian PC virulence that employs 'two minutes of hate' & ideological conformity but Huxleyean Pop Culture 'vibrancy' that associates Diversity and Blacks with thrills and ecstasy. Either whites are poisoned with hatred for their own race OR drugged with love for the Other, especially black thuggery, whose jungle-jive is pushed onto whites like meth. The West advanced most in technology but, along the way, lost its sense of culture and heritage that seemed like hindrances to instant gratification via TV, music, and self-indulgence. So, even though Western technology is the product of thousands of years of civilization, it is now mainly used to celebrate and sensationalize the savage prowess and exploits of the most savage race, the Negro.

What is especially demented about current PC is its sheer amnesia. It is so totally sure that the latest 'new normal' is the absolute truth that all people most obey, BUT the goal posts are changed ever so often. It is totally fanatical but also totally amnesiac. It is so rabidly committed to the latest fashion in dogma that it totally ignores the fact that its positions not long ago were very different, even opposite.
PC is insipid and vapid because it's the collective cultism of nitwits who are emotionally shallow and intellectually dishonest. Consider an idiot like Emma Sulkowicz who wallows in trashy whore-behavior but then plays poor helpless victim of ‘sexism’. Such people cannot connect the dots or add 2 + 2 of the social or moral equation. They are utterly without hope of self-realization. After all, if the powers-that-be insist that position A is totally sacrosanct but then, after some time, insist that position B, which is at odds with position A, is totally sacrosanct, you should question the twisted logic of this game, that is if you can think for yourself. After all, how can A be totally correct and then its opposite B be totally correct? If the powers-that-be that once told you that A is totally correct are now telling you that B is totally correct, maybe neither is totally correct. Maybe A and B are partially correct or not correct at all. And maybe C, the next great ‘truth’, will also turn out to be wrong and be superseded by something else. The problem of PC isn’t that its current formulation isn’t totally correct. No ideology or position can be totally correct on anything as humanity is a very complex phenomena. The real problem of PC is the emotional stupidity that demands virulent fanaticism and rabid hysteria of the moment, one that is utterly amnesiac about earlier hysteria and bouts of fanaticism around markedly different ‘truths’ of the then ‘current year’. PC idiots, aka SJW’s, are like dogs who can easily be swayed to bark at C or D or E or F. They are as unthinking as the countless dupes of National Socialist Germany or Maoist China. When Hitler said communists are eternal enemies, his minions agreed 100%. But when Stalinist Russia became an ally of Nazi Germany, the Soviets were suddenly the good guys. But when Hitler decided to invade Russia, the Soviets were suddenly evil again. During the height of the Cultural Revolution, Maoist China had everyone believing that Lin Biao, Mao’s then heir-apparent, was the most wonderful person after Mao and that the US was the eternal enemy with which Red China could never see eye-to-eye on anything. But then, the Chinese were told that Lin was the worst scumbag traitor, and few years later, the Chinese were told the US wasn’t so bad after Mao met with Nixon. One of the lessons the Chinese learned from the fanatical political correctness and madness of the Cultural Revolution and thereafter is that the powers-that-be manipulate the masses like dogs. And it is no different with PC in the West. The power of PC rests on rabid hysteria of the Current Year, amnesia, and the lack of emotional maturity & intellectual honesty to think for oneself. (Mass Cult is easy with control of mass media. Look how the entire nation of North Korea is nuts about the Kim the Great. Why? Kim controls the mass media. Look how a man as crazy as Hitler or Mao could become 'mainstream' rulers over entire nations and be revered by so many. Cult + Media Control = the New Normal. Look at the mindless celebrity worship in the West. Why are moronic rappers revered as gods and heroes by so many people? Pop Culture is their reality and religion.)

What is PC really? Do the powers-that-be really believe in the nonsense? Most of them don’t. The rich and privileged feign allegiance to PC because they want the Left off their backs. Also, they’ve spent a lot of money to change the nature of Leftism to make it less threatening and challenging to the capitalist class. Notice that leftism went from class-based concerns about workers to adoration of vain elitist homosexuals and narcissistic trannies. Such decadent frivolity doesn’t threaten the rich class since homos and trannies love wealth & privilege and go out of their way to work with the elites to indulge their fantasies and whimsies.

If the powers-that-be don’t really believe in PC, where does it come from? Most PC comes from hack academics or cranky intellectuals who seek to compensate for their material and intellectual inferiority by seeking influence and clout via pseudo-prophetic theorizing and vapid radical gesticulating. Humanities and social sciences will never be as prestigious as hard sciences and technological fields. Hard scientists can prove their theories, and scientific laws can be applied to technology that can lead to products and services that earn billions of dollars for innovators and investors. As for great artists and genuine intellectuals, they thrive in a world of inspiration and freedom. Hack academics in second-rate colleges and cranky egotists in first-rate colleges feel envy and resentment, and the inner-Mao in them goes batty with rage. They naturally target the young with their ideas since impressionable students can be made to believe in anything, all the easier because our public education and mass media inculcate PC into young minds from cradle. Supported by ever-replenished supply of naive suckers every year, colleges can sustain PC for almost indefinitely(until the cycle is broken). Just when seniors are beginning to realize that maybe they’ve been fed nonsensical crap by professors, they are set to graduate and a new crop of naive freshmen arrive on campus to serve as new ‘Red Tards’, even though it’s more like Pink Tards since Homomania is the neo-religion of demented America.

At any rate, Jordan Peterson is trying to persuade young people to think things through. Instead of screaming & foaming at the mouth in allegiance to PC fed to them by hack academics, crank-intellectuals, and bureaucratic commissars, each person should go on his own journey of discovery to find the truth. To do so, people must be willing to be challenged, consider contrasting opinions, question the reigning template, control their own emotions, cultivate a sense of courage, and understand that reality is too complex to be summed up with few slogans and chants.
Thus, Peterson is an anti-cultist. The people who flock around him don’t worship him, and his message to them is not ‘obey me’ or ‘do as I say’. Rather, he’s asking them to learn to think for themselves just as he thinks for himself. They don’t have to agree with him, but they must develop an autonomy of mind instead of being automatons of the powers-that-be that use PC in the most cynical way.

But, the powers-that-be, in their malice and mendacity, project their own use of cultism on Jordan Peterson. It is PC that is cultist. Worse, it is mass-cultist because through the powers of mass media and mass education, the powers-that-be have the means to spread their mania into every corner of society. Consider something like ‘gay marriage’, which is a cultish idea. How did something so insane spread like wildfire? Because people experience electronic media as their main reality. Who controls the flow of electricity and the shaping of digital information into images and sounds for billions of people around the world? The Jewish globalists. They are the ones who elevated and expanded the campy cultist homosexual self-reverence to a World Culture via their control of electronic highways. And how did someone like Bruce Jenner become ‘Woman of the Year’? How did that bit of cultism of tranny lunacy become mainstream? Because the powers-that-be have used their electronic media monopoly to beam images of Jenner as the icons of New Normal in Womanhood.

And there is, of course, the cultism of Jewish supremacism that says we must all bow down to Jews and worship the Shoah and support Zionists over Palestinians. It is cultist because it’s not normal for all the world to support Zionist oppression of Palestinians(who never invaded or hurt any people around the world), all the more so because it contradicts the Jewish Narrative that Jews are ‘progressives’ who work to spread tolerance and equality. If that’s true, why is Jewish power working to shut down BDS and force all Americans, Europeans, and Canadians to favor Zionists over Palestinians? Only mindless cultism can make us blind to the brazen hypocrisy.

The cultism of Jewish Supremacism is so powerful that even Jordan Peterson is under its spell and dare not question it.

Anyway, it’s a common tactic among PC commissars and globalist Jews to project their own lunacies onto others. Jews are the most supremacist people in the world but they accuse white gentiles of ‘supremacism’. Jews, who insist that all white people must honor, obey, and worship Jews, defame White National Liberationists(who simply want OUT of the Jewish Globalist Empire) as ‘supremacists’. Black thugs, who commit most racial violence, blame whites and other non-blacks of interracial violence. It's pure projection. Slut Pride feminists who indulge in all sorts of sexual hijinks and harlotry accuse men of ‘exploiting sex’ when they’ve done exactly the same. #MeToo should really stand for "Me a slut and me too use sex for self-interest and advantage." And then, there are homos who are now into self-worship projecting their own intolerance on those who refuse to bend over to Homomania. PC blinds us to the fact that ‘gay rights’ has morphed into Gay Rites, a ritualism whereby we just all bow down to homos and trannies as holy angels with rainbow wings.

Jordan Peterson, like him or not, agree or disagree with him, is a relatively courageous figure who is defending free speech, calling for open discussion, and appealing to young people to reject the cultist mono-culture of PC that has turned so many young people into mindless zombies chanting the same slogans or even using ‘antifa’ violence to shut down anyone or any side that brings different mental dishes to the table. If the Irish potato famine is any indication, mono-systems are vulnerable because everything or everyone works exactly alike regardless of what it or he is doing is good or bad. PC mental-farming has produced lots and lots of like-minded potatoheads in the biggest mass cult in history. But a single truth-fungus can threaten the entire crop and upend the entire harvest because PC minds are incapable of responding to reality in any way that is different from the mono-programming. So, the White Left(or ‘baizuo’ as the Chinese call it) will be destroyed either by Diversity that it welcomes or by honesty-and-truth(mostly found in Alt Right today) that will set their minds from the PC infection. Of course, the latter is preferable because the White Left, awakened into the White Right, will save Western Civilization and have stable communities. In contrast, if the White Left is destroyed by its own delusional enthusiasm for Diversity, there will be nothing good for them as it will be the permanent fall of advanced civilizations. Who really thinks Europe will be enriched by Africans and Muslims?

Agendoxing: Doxing Agendas, Funders, & Ulterior Motives Against Those who Dox Names & Residences

Doxing is a weapon of choice among the Powers-that-be. They know that Doxing is an effective means of silencing the opposition because despite First Amendment protections, socio-economic relations in the US are governed by a system of taboos enforced by PC. So, even though the First Amendment allows you to express your creed, if your beliefs offend the reigning dogma, you can be destroyed socially and economically. You can be shunned by ‘Normies’, pod-people of PC, and, worse, lose your job and means of sustenance, even if the job is modest and low-paying. When someone is doxed, it could mean losing a job waiting tables or washing dishes.

For reasons that are sincerely political/moral or craven/cowardly, many businesses will not hire or keep on those tainted with the heresy of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, ‘homophobia’, the three cardinal sins.
Cities will offer sanctuaries to illegal invaders. Major Jewish firms will reward a traitor like Jonathan Pollard with a plush job upon being pardoned. A billionaire Jew Arnon Milchan who confessed to stealing US secrets for Israel can walk around freely in the US. Roman Polanski who drugged and anal-raped a 12 yr old girl gets protection from the powers-that-be in Hollywood and France.

Jews and Liberals constantly remind us of the bad ole days of ‘McCarthyism’ when communists and fellow-travelers were blacklisted in Hollywood and fired from government jobs. They say censorship and professional restrictions back then, whether government-imposed or self-imposed, were unconstitutional and violated civil liberties despite the fact that communists and Soviet agents had infiltrated various levels of state and culture, indeed to the extent of slipping atomic secrets to Stalin. At any rate, so-called McCarthyism lasted only several years, whereas PC blacklisting & career-destruction seem to go on indefinitely. And Liberals, who once took the stage as principled defenders of liberties and rights, are now most vociferous in demanding that people be censored, fired, and/or blacklisted for their beliefs. Or be bankrupted, like with morally decent & courageous bakers who refuse to make ‘gay wedding cakes’ in celebration of Homomania, the replacement christianity cooked up by Jewish globalists. (Jews hate traditional Christianity and want it replaced with Queertianity.) And entire internet sites have been deplatformed, and people like Jared Taylor have been arbitrarily denied service from Paypal and removed from Twitter even though they never violated the Terms of Agreement.

Of course, it’s not just White National Liberationists who are under attack. BDS Movement is also under constant assault, and US politicians are ganging up to criminalize political support for the Palestinian cause of using sanctions and boycotts to stop Zionist theft of land. What was okay against Apartheid South Africa is not okay against Apartheid Israel that still occupies West Bank in violation of International Laws. And there is mostly utter silence from media and academia on this double standard. But why should we be surprised in a nation where Deep State and Big Media(run by Jewish globalists) have done little else but to collude either to bring down the Trump administration or to pressure him to follow the Neocon Zionist supremacist plan of wrecking more nations to serve Israel’s interests. As the Power decides what is or isn’t HATE, those who support the Zionist hatred against Palestinians are rewarded with high positions and big money. But those who oppose and hate the Jewish-Homo-Supremacist Tyranny are demeaned and smeared. So, Jews can hate proud white Europeans, but white people better not hate back the Jews who hate them and feel nothing but rabid & virulent contempt for them. Jews can be aggressive in their viciousness, but whites must only be passive in their resignation.

So, what is to be done? Can we dox the globalists, Jews, Neocons, and their ilk? But what would be the point? After all, they are famous, renowned, and widely praised. Everyone knows their name and, if anything, they’ve been rewarded handsomely for what they are and what they believe. How can we dox someone like Wolf Blitzer when everyone knows who Wolf Blitzer is and when his being Wolf Blitzer earns him millions of dollars a year? Globalist academics, media people, and political figures don’t need to hide their identities and positions. They are safe & secure, favored by the system, and rewarded most handsomely for their speaking points and policy positions. They don’t have to hide behind internet pseudonyms or avatars. They are out in public and showered with accolades and earning big money.

And yet, we can dox them in another way. We can dox the true agenda behind their masks, personas, and honorifics. We can agenda-dox Neocons as Zionist-supremacists. Now, some have done this already but only in a mild way. While it’s been pointed out that many or most Neocons are Jews who care about Israel, it hasn’t been widely discussed that current Zionism is Jewish supremacist imperialism. We need to expose Zionism and Jewish Interests as Jewish Supremacism because they are not about Jews caring about Jews but about Jews forcing all non-Jews to support and serve a Jewish agenda at the expense of gentiles of all kinds.
We need to point out that so many of those who push for ‘Western Values’ are nothing but shills of Jewish supremacism. German politicians are running dogs of Jewish globalists, and German journalists are paid agents of CIA.

We need to expose the fact that ‘gay rights’ is really a neo-religious movement of Homomania or Queertianity that is, furthermore, a proxy of Jewish supremacist agenda of elite-minority-privilege-and-supremacism. Instead of just opposing or arguing with the other side, we need to agenda-dox or ‘agendox’ the other side as shills of people like George Soros and the Jewish globalist powers-that-be. Even so-called ‘radical’ Antifa is just a thug-arm of Jewish Supremacists and globalists. They are the goon squad of the elites who maintain the facade of respectability while instigating Antifa and BLM thuggery to silence the other side and/or to cover up their own elitism & anti-black agenda. After all, Jewish and White Liberal Yuppies used gentrification and tough-policing to clamp down on black urban violence, without which they couldn't have revived the downtown areas of big cities that were going the way of Detroit or Baltimore. To mask what they’ve really been doing, they fanned the flames of BLM to virtue-signal as ‘good progressives’ in support of Noble Blacks against ‘racist’ white police brutality.

The fact is people are really something other than what they claim to be. There is often the whore behind the aura. Their true motives in service to hidden agendas need to be agendoxed. Take American Enterprise Institute and American Interest. The term ‘American’ makes them sound patriotic, like ‘American as Apple Pie’. But look at the personalities of those involved and follow the money trail, and you get Jewish supremacists and their cuck puppets.

Many people are not exactly what they claim to be. Most ‘conservatives’ are not true conservatives, and most ‘liberals’ are not true liberals. Most of them are molded by the Power. Some know this and just go along for self-interest while others are too dumb to ever notice that they are being played. The reason why they lack principled consistency in accordance to stated beliefs & values is because the ultimate guarantee for their privilege flows from their masters who pay the salary, provide the directives, and enforce the taboos(that can make or break a reputation over a single word or phrase). Someone like Paul Ryan is not a ‘conservative’. Once such a lowly creature is ‘agendoxed’, people will know what he’s really about. He is just a lame pathetic cuck-shill of Zionist supremacists. It’s no wonder he praised Antifa scum as the equivalent of US soldiers who landed on Normandy when those punks attacked White National Liberationists who came in peace to give speeches at Charlottesville.

We need to perfect the Art of Agendoxing. Don’t take the job titles and stated creeds at their face value. Most politicians are shills, most academics are hacks, most activists are dupes, and most people in media are propagandists who cynically or naively push the official line. What choice do they have when most of the media are controlled by Big Money of the Jewish Globalist Oligarchs?

Is a Nation(such as America) Just-an-Idea? Is a Person Just-an-Idea?

It’s a common practice(even habit) among politicians and thinkers(mostly official scribes) to reiterate that America is an Idea or even ‘just an idea’. But is a nation just an idea? Can a nation be just an idea? And if a nation is just an idea, is it no longer a nation if those ideas fade and are replaced by new ones?

Let’s compare a nation with a person. Just like nations have an official ideology, identity, and/or narrative, every person has set of values and beliefs. So, the person is shaped by those ideas. Therefore, does it follow that the person is those ideas? Of course not. Rather, isn’t he a holder of those ideas or ideals? Isn’t he a believer in certain tenets and principles than the very embodiment of those ideas? If he is those ideas, is he not himself when sleeping and not thinking of those ideas? Even in waking state, is he himself only when he espouses those ideas?

While ideas and beliefs are very important, a person is primarily his core biological and biographical being. He was himself even before he espoused those ideas, he is himself with those ideas, and he will still be himself even after he has rejected those ideas and moved onto a different creed. Suppose a person claims to be a libertarian or communist. That makes him a person who espouses libertarian principles or communist dogma. So, is he the person = set of ideas? No, he is a person who follows or upholds those ideas. To conflate him-as-core-being with him-as-believer-of-ideas is utterly foolish. If we define people that way, a person is nothing unless he comes into belief in a set of ideas. And he must remain faithful to those ideas because failing to do so will unperson him. Idiotic, right?

Then, why do we apply such fallacy to the nation of America? If America is an idea(as opposed to a nation that upholds certain ideas, which have changed over the course of its history), then America was not America until those ideas came to fruition & dominance. And America would no longer be America if those ideas were compromised or rejected for new ones. In fact, however, America will always be America no matter what ideas it espouses since America is essentially the land mass between Canada and Mexico(and Alaska and Hawaii) constituting the continuity of a particular civilization that originated and developed from the mass arrival of Europeans.

Also, using the current PC logic of ideocentrism, America was not America for most if its history. If indeed America is the current set of globalist PC ideas, then it couldn’t have been America since it held onto different ideas, attitudes, and values in the past. Until the mid-1860s, America had slavery, and until the Civil War, the Northern Free States tolerated slavery in the South. Since America then had slavery — ideas at odds with freedom — , America must not have been America. We are told that America cannot be ‘racist’. But America wouldn’t exist if not for ‘racism’. White Europeans conquered America and drove out the native peoples who came to be called ‘Indians’. And there were race wars between whites and reds where the former prevailed. Also, until 1965, American immigration policy favored Europeans, especially Northern Europeans, over other peoples. Since the ideas back then were very much at odds with current Ideas(that are said to define True America), America must not have been America in the past, at least prior to 1965 when the Immigration Policy was changed by Jews.

Some have said America is a Christian nation. Some revised it to Judeo-Christian nation. It is true enough that America, as founded, was an overwhelmingly Christian Protestant nation. There’s no doubt that Christianity has been culturally and historically important to America. But is America = Christianity? But the Founding Fathers were Deists who were skeptical of Biblical claims. And they thought Jesus was a great man than a Son of God. If America = Christianity, it was founded by remarkable men who were not the most committed Christians. Also, many Americans of prominence were agnostics or atheists.

While ideas and values matter a great deal, a nation is much more than that. Nations are like people in this sense. If Bob and John are both libertarians, are they the same? After all, they believe in the same ideas. If nations are ideas, why shouldn’t we say humans are ideas too? So, Bob and John would be interchangeable since they are both ideas of libertarianism. But we know this is not true. Even if Bob and John believe in a certain ideology, they are more than what they believe. Also, even when people espouse the same ideology, they interpret and practice it differently. There are no two same Christians. Each person responds to Jesus in his or her own way. And each person came to libertarianism in his own way. And he practices libertarianism in his own way due to factors of intelligence, integrity, character, personality, happenstance, and circumstances. So, a person has a being and story beyond any set of beliefs.
Furthermore, an idea changes over time and can evolve to the point where it has little semblance of its original self. It’s like meanings of words change over time, even to the point of meaning something profoundly different from its original usage. Consider how the Greek term ‘tyrant’ didn’t necessarily have negative connotations but came to mean an evil oppressive ruler. Indeed, even Liberal Americans of the past would not recognize today’s so-called ‘liberalism’. And Progressives 100 yrs ago, or even 50 yrs ago, would be appalled at much of what passes for ‘progressivism’ today. And Conservatives from 50 yrs ago would find nothing conservative about current Conservatism Inc. that’s mostly about "Democrats are the real racists" and "Muh Israel".

Just like every person is more than the ideas he believes, a nation is more than the ideas it upholds and practices. If America is an idea, then it would follow that any other nation that shares those ideas are also ‘America’. If America is about democracy and tolerance, then isn’t Mexico also ‘America’ since it is also a tolerant democracy? Isn’t Germany also ‘America’ since it is democratic? Isn’t Brazil also America because of its democracy?
As for ‘diversity’, it can be an ideal or a condition. A nation can be diverse in actuality but not see diversity as a good thing. A nation can be homogeneous but see diversity as a desired ideal. Many diverse nations are not happy with their diversity and plagued with tensions. Some nations have traditionally been homogeneous but came under Jewish PC influence and feel inadequate because they are not ‘diverse’ enough. So, they welcome Africans and Muslims to increase diversity. Current Sweden believes Sweden = Ideal of Diversity. Since the new mandatory Idea = Diversity, many Swedes don’t believe Sweden was True Sweden in the past. True Sweden can only be created via adherence to the idea of Diversity. See how utterly stupid this line of thinking is? If indeed Sweden = Diversity, are Peru and Morocco ‘Sweden’ since they have Diversity?

Furthermore, if we claim that America is America ONLY IF it commits to the current PC of ‘anti-racism’, then even the America of either political party is not that True America. After all, both parties support Zionist-imperialist-supremacist repression of Palestinians. If True America must not play favorites among racial, ethnic, or national groups, why does the current US favor Zionists over Palestinians? Why does it favor Israel(that has 200 nuclear weapons) to Iran(that adheres to international nuclear agreements and has no nukes)? And why do the national Media favor Jews, blacks, and homos over other groups IF INDEED America is all about ‘equality’ and not about ‘playing favorites’? And if all peoples and groups are equally valuable, why must all peoples be made to support Jews/Zionism and Homomania BUT Jews and Homos are not required to support, praise, or celebrate Mormons, Palestinian-Americans? Or Chinese-Americans, Russian-Americans, German-Americans, or Incest-Sexuals? And if America is about using its might to remind us of past injustices, why is there no Nakba Remembrance Day? And if America is about waging war on its ‘racist’ past, why is the South attacked for Confederate monuments but the North isn’t condemned for its ‘genocidal’ wars against Indians? And if America is all about ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’, why does it honor the memory of Emma Lazarus who fully endorsed Manifest Destiny and called on more Europeans and Jews to come to America and grab remaining Indian territories by killing Indians or reducing them to wretched huddled masses in barren reservations?

If America is an idea, it is not America whenever it violates those principles. So, America could not have been America during WWII since its media called Japanese ‘Japs’ — how ‘racist’!! — and since the government rounded up Japanese-in-America for ‘internment’. Some German-Americans, tens of thousands of them, were also ‘interned’. Since the US violated its ideals, it must not have been America back then.

Now, certain ideas and values have become so ingrained or instituted into a nation or civilization that there is a tendency to conclude: Identity + Place = Ideas + Values. But the core identity of a people in a place is always more than any set of ideas and values. China was a Confucian Civilization for a long long time. But was it no longer China because Chinese Communists waged war on Confucianism? No, China was China even under the ideology of Maoists. Current China dearly loves businessmen who get rich. But Confucianism despised the merchant class. If China = Confucian Ideas, then current China is not China since the current ideas and values are so much at odds with traditional Confucian moralism.
Now, take the Turks. For the longest time, Turks were defined by Islam. But Kemal Ataturk came along and created modern secular Turkey where religion was banished from much of public life and state affairs. So, were modern Turks no longer Turks since Turkishness = Islam? Atarturkism proved that there is more to Turkishness than what Turks believe as credo.
Same goes for Greeks. Ancient Greeks were pagans. Then, they became Christians. Since their ideas and credos changed, were they no longer Greeks? Or did Greek become True Greeks only as Christians? But, if Greekness = Christian Credo, are Greeks no longer Greek if they become atheist or secular?

Ideas matter but they are not the core of an identity. Under communism, the Soviet authorities insisted that Russia and its Soviet Republics were all defined by an Idea. Soviet Union was a Proposition Empire of Marxism-Leninism. But if that is True Russia, was Russia not Russia prior to the Revolution when it had espoused different ideas and values? And did Russia cease to be Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed and communism was no longer the Propositional Idea of Russians?

The fact is cradle matters more than credo. Each person exists because he was born and develops a biography. That existence is the core essential self. Now, ideas and values are very important because humans live with beliefs and principles. But a person is a person, he is himself, regardless of what he believes. John is John as a libertarian. If he chooses to reject libertarianism and adopt communtarianism, he is still John. And even if he changes his name to ‘Muhammad’, he is still his biological self who was born of his parents. Even as ‘Muhammad’, he is the person who was born to such and such parents and was named John, experienced a unique personal history that led him to current set of beliefs that led him to change his name to ‘Muhammad’.

This much is true. Bad ideas or attitudes lead to degradation and demise of a person or nation. Hedonism will destroy a person. Fanaticism can destroy him too. And radical ideologies can bring about hell on earth to nations. Also, crude impulses can ruin a person like crazed personalities can destroy a nation. Take National Socialism. It had good ideas and bad ideas. Its good idea was nationalism and German revival, its bad idea was imperialism and racial chauvinism. What really destroyed Germany wasn’t so much the ideas but the crazed personalities who impulsively acted on the worst ideas of National Socialism. (Even systems with bad ideas can be steered safely by sane personalities. Gorbachev and Deng took over systems founded on radical ideas but steered them to moderation and world peace. If someone like Albert Speer had gained control of National Socialist Germany, wars would have been avoided.) Personalities of a nation are like impulses in a person. If a person’s neurons go haywire and go for short-term impulses than long-term sobriety, a man or woman can be lost to drugs or debauchery. Likewise, if a nation indulges the most radical, fanatical, or crazed personalities to to pursue their egotistical or tribal lusts without restraint, the result is something like US embroilment in Wars for Israel that laid waste to the Arab/Muslim world and destroyed millions of lives, resulting in the massive flood of Europe with 'refugees' as well. Another result is the ‘new cold war’ with Russia on the premise that the entire world exists mainly to serve the megalomania of Jewish supremacists who hypocritically mask their ultra-tribalism and egotism with platitudes about ‘spreading democracy’, ‘liberal democracy’, and ‘human rights’.

One of the worst and most dangerous ideas is to put credo before cradle or to conflate cradle with credo. Such assumption says a person’s ideas are more important that the person. Indeed, we are believe he is the idea. Using such logic, he is no longer a person unless he espouses certain ideas. He is unpersoned if he were to question or reject those ideas. Likewise, globalists threaten to un-nation America unless it commits to the ideas of Emma Lazarus.
But then, even if we play by rules of PC, are Lazarusean ideas really in line with Current PC that claims to be the True America? Wasn’t Emma Lazarus an imperialist and ethno-supremacist? After all, more European and Jewish immigration to America meant the expulsion of American Indians from their ancestral lands. If America is about ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’, didn’t Lazarusean ethos violate those principles since continued mass arrival of Europeans and white Jews made America less ‘red’(Indian) and more white? Jews say their ancestors ran from pogroms in Eastern Europe, but wasn't America created by 'pogroms' against Indians, just like Israel was created later with massive pogroms against Palestinians in the Nakba?
Furthermore, if Americanism is about atonement for its ‘racist’ past, why does the current America support Israel that was created by imperialism, pogromic ethnic cleansing, & destruction of Palestine and, furthermore, occupies West Bank & practices Apartheid there? If America is an Ideal that requires feeling guilty over Jim Crow and once-alliance with apartheid-practicing South Africa, why is it so un-repenting of its historical ‘sins’ against Palestinians? And if America is about equality, why is there more ‘white guilt’ for what was done to blacks than what was done to American Indians? Surely, ‘genocide’ is a bigger crime than slavery.

When we look at Current America, it’s less about an idea than an agenda(driven by the zealous ego of an ethnic tribe). If America is really an idea as this ethnic tribe claims, why don’t the members of this tribe practice these ideas themselves? If whites must forgo their racial identity and interests to serve the higher idea of True America, why don’t Jews forgo their identity and tribal interests to just merge with all other Americans? Why do Jews tell European-Americans that it’s wrong to preserve and serve European identity but insist that not only Jews but all gentile groups must support, praise, and serve Jewish identity, Jewish heritage, Zionist Israel, and Wars for Israel? Why do Jews insist that all non-Jews must worship Jews-as-Jews. Worse, why do they insist that all non-Jews must hate peoples and nations hated by Jews? So, if Jews hate Russians, all gentiles(even Russians) must hate Russians. If Jews hate Iranians, all gentiles(even Iranians) must hate Iranians. So much for America being an Idea. That ‘idea’ in Current America is just a ruse used by the Agenda serving the Ego of a rabid, virulent, and fanatical ethnic tribe.

Finally, if indeed America is an Idea, there is no need for people to come to America. Ideas are portable and transferable. If American Ideas are the best, then the rest of the world can adopt and use those ideas. It's like, if a people learn how to make fire, that idea can be borrowed by other peoples who can make their own fires in their own lands. They don't have to come to the people with the fire to have the fire.
It's like one doesn't have to go to Mecca to be a Muslim or go to the Vatican to become a Catholic. Islam and Catholicism are ideas or creed. They can be adopted by any people in any part of the world.
So, even if we argue America = Idea, the world can just adopt Americanism-as-Idea in their own nations. There is no need for them to flood into America. Also, if democracy was a precious commodity in the 19th century, it is dime-a-dozen all over the world. Most nations are democracies around the world. Besides, much of the world has been 'Americanized' with McDonalds, Hollywood, Evangelicalism, and even Homomania. They can have their 'America' in their own nations.

Smug Drug of Political Correctness

Why do people take certain illegal drugs. They want to get high and feel super. They want to be like insta-gods. Drugs — PCP, cocaine, amphetamines, heroin, meth, etc. — elevate their sense-of-being with euphoria that fills them with delusions of grandeur. Consider James Woods in the movie THE BOOST where his coke-head character feels he can do anything when high on powder. Cocaine boosts his ego with Mood Supremacism. He feels like the greatest player that ever lived. He feels invincible, better than all the rest. Addicted to the sensation, he returns to the drug for the high over and over and over, and eventually he can't do without it.

Our world tends to associate ‘supremacism’ with ‘white racism’, but wanting to feel superior/supreme is a common trait among all peoples. Religions fill people with a sense of spiritual supremacism: "Our god or gods are better than yours", "God is on our side", "I am holier than thou". And the reason why women are so obsessed about cosmetics and celebrity is because they're drawn to the culture of Beauty Supremacism. Women want to look better than other women.
And men are obsessed with sports that are premised on masculine supremacism of the tougher guys lording over weaker guys, making big bucks, and humping ‘hot babes’.

So, despite all this stuff about ‘equality’, our society is obsessed with supremacism of all kinds. And one of the easiest kinds of highs is Moral Supremacism. Thus, Political Correctness or PC is really a kind of drug. Karl Marx called religion the ‘opiate of the masses’. PC is crack for the self-righteous. Certain terms like ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, ‘homophobia’, and etc. have a drug-like effect on those who chant them. Though ostensibly used against bigots, chauvinists, and supremacists, the reason for their terminological appeal is the euphoric effect upon snorting, vaping, injecting, or popping doses of self-righteousness.
And this is why PC is dangerous. It really has to be treated as a drug addiction. Anyone who has observed so-called ‘SJW’ types will notice they are not amenable to compromise, understanding, and reason. They just love to repeat the mantras of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and ‘homophobia’(and sometimes ‘misogyny’, ‘xenophobia’, and ‘Islamophobia’) because another 'hit' of virtue-vanity gives them easy highs.
Trying to communicate with such people is like trying to get through to those intoxicated on moonshine or flying on speed. The smug are more prone to preening self-righteousness, and the easiest way to feel holier-than-thou is by resorting to PC. This addiction isn’t limited to a single group. Even Conservatives are addicted to insta-virtue by preaching that the Democrats are the ‘real racists’. No one wants to discuss complex issues with honesty and reason since they care more about supremacist sensations of easy virtue.
Even cucking is a form of PC drug addiction. Sniffing Cuckaine makes one bunch of whites feel insta-morally-superior to other whites(those who refuse to cuck). Cucks feel as ‘good whites’ attacking ‘bad whites’. It’s near-impossible to get through to them with honest debate since the likes of David French are so full of themselves as ‘good whites’ who say the Magic Words of insta-virtue.

In this sense, media and academia should really be seen as Big Pharma of the mind. They are drug-dealers who push PC as Uppers and Downers to the confused and impressionable who, by abusing terminological substances of PC, get to indulge in self-righteous supremacism as a raging high.

National or Imperial Greatness is Overrated

GREATNESS is overrated in World Affairs. What’s essential is goodness. There is no need for a people to be GREAT in order to maintain a nice nation and find meaning and happiness. They only need to be free and good.

Consider the breakup of the Soviet Union in which the various peoples were supposed to share in the great glory of Soviet-Russian Power. So what if the Baltic States(among many others) were no longer part of a ‘great empire’? They gained national independence and reclaimed national sovereignty.

Today, the real threat to the Baltics comes from EU as another Imperial Power, albeit a puppet empire of the even more powerful Zionist-American Empire. Also, Western Culture and Values aren’t what they used to be. In the past, it was beneficial for Eastern Europeans to look westward and learn from the great Brits, French, Italians, and Germans who were ahead of the game in everything.
But what are the current Western Values under globalism dominated by Jews and their proxy homos? Homomania, Rap music, Jungle Fever, ugly feminism, slut pride, skankery, adultery, Diversity, and infantilism.

That is why Baltic States are vulnerable as member states of EU. It was wonderful for them to break free of the great but repressive Soviet Empire. But they are now falling under control of demented globalist empire. Baltic nations need to be free of all empires despite their promise of 'greatness'.
Better to be free and good than be puppets sharing in Russian Greatness. Better to be free and good than be puppets sharing in EU greatness(that amounts to homo decadence and Africanization).

Empires come with a host of problems. Sure, Soviet Union was very powerful and EU is very rich(and being part of their imperial order comes with a certain prestige), but, all said and done, Soviets stood for communist repression & Russian bullying, and globalism is ultimately about the megalomania of Zionist-Homo supremacist lunacy.

What Baltic States need is national sovereignty and security. They don’t have to be GREAT. They just need to be free and good.
Indeed, most people are not great. They are not great scientists, great artists, great thinkers, great tycoons, or great athletes. But do they not have value? They have value if they are good and decent, and most nations should aspire to be good, free, and independent.

Better to be free as a good man than be a slave of a great empire. The latter may be part of something great but he is still a slave. As part of the Soviet Union, those Baltic States were puppet-states. They gained freedom with the fall of Soviet Empire and reclaimed their right to be free and good.
But now, they face the danger of becoming puppet-slaves of globalism, an ideology even worse than Soviet Communism.

It's better to be free as a good modest person than a slave of a great lord? As a slave, you may share in the glory of your master, but you’re still just a slave, a dog than a man.

Did the Rise of Educated Parents Lead to Political Correctness?

We generally associate more education and higher learning with expansion of discourse and thought. The idea is that educated people tend to be liberal(in a good way) and more open to new ideas and contrasting perspectives. Such assumption is surely valid to some degree.
But, we must ask... Is current education-in-general more about open-mindedness and critical-thinking or about ideological dogmatism, secular idolatry, and political conformity? If the former, it’s very possible that more education will lead to greater exchange of ideas and honest discussion of power. But if the latter, more education could very well make people closed-minded and judgmental in their conformity to the prevailing Political Correctness.

Prior to the boomer generation, only a small section of Americans got higher education. Even the Greatest Generation, with their G.I. Bills, focused on learning skills to get jobs. It was with the boomers that a burgeoning number of young people went to college to expand their minds. However, the 60s were a time of extreme ideological and racial polarization, and many boomer students spent their college years getting radicalized than intellectualized. Their youth became defined and qualified by the level of commitment, determination, and self-righteousness. Even though they were more libertine in their socio-cultural attitudes(in regards to church, manners, and sexual mores) than their parents, they were more judgmental in their ideological views. In contrast, their parents were more uptight about sexuality and more likely to respect traditional manners, but because they were less educated, their views on politics tended to be less radical. Sure, parents of boomers could be political like Archie Bunker in defending the flag or hating communism. But because of their relative lack of education and ‘sophistication’, their attitudes were more about patriotism and sentiment. It was knee-jerk stuff. Because they didn’t have elaborately intellectual rationale behind their political views, they were less likely to be radical about it. After all, radicals are ideological extremists. For one to be truly ideological, there has to be intellectual pedigree behind one's commitments. The parents of boomers simply didn’t have a complex thought system behind what they believed. Also, even as they disagreed with their boomer kids radicalized by college and media, they thought maybe the kids knew better with their superior education. After all, they worked hard and raised their kids to get the kind of college education that they didn't get or got an inferior version of during the Great Depression or the crude era of G.I. Bill mass education. Parents of boomers felt patriotic feelings but lacked a thought-system. In contrast, their boomer kids were instilled with mind-systems to support their radical views. While political emotions ebb and flow, the cold steel of ideology is always present among those who've adopted an intellectual(or pseudo-intellectual) thought system. Even though both Archie Bunker and Meathead are prone to outbursts, the difference is Archie runs on emotions & sentiment whereas Meathead is energized by an ideology & agenda. Also, because Meathead is better educated, he is so sure that he ‘knows everything’. His intellectual supremacism leads to moral supremacism. In contrast, even though Archie Bunker is very sure about some things, he sees himself as a servant of God, nation, and tradition. He doesn't think HE himself knows everything.

Even though Archie Bunker disapproves of much that Gloria says and does, he left her alone to develop her own mind. Not being a thinker or intellectual, he played the conventional role of father, letting Gloria to develop as a person on her own by way of education, entertainment, and experimentation. Bunker trusted that the institutions would do a good job filling his daughter with the right kinds of ideas. He didn’t hover over her at all times. He saw himself as a undereducated man, so his main role was to provide for Gloria so she would get real knowledge from school and media. So, despite his cantankerous nature and abrasiveness, Gloria didn’t grow up under his shadow. She developed on her own.
In contrast, well-educated Meathead believes he knows all there is to know since he read so many books, got a college degree, and settled in an intellectual position as teacher. As such, he plays a much bigger role in the raising of his child. He’s not content to play the role of father who tells funny stories and provides food on the table. He wants to steer his son to think like him and judge the world as he does. And since there is no God as higher authority, there is only the power of ideology as the final word.

Thus, we end up with a conundrum. It’s possible that more free-thinking kids will come from undereducated parents and less free-thinking kids will come from overeducated parents. Undereducated parents don’t know much and leave their kids to learn stuff on their own. Now, it’s possible that these kids will come under power of PC at school. But because they are not under ideological domination at home, they are likely to develop a more libertine attitude about things. In contrast, kids of overeducated(which is to say over-indoctrinated) parents will get PC not only from school but at home from their parents. So, they got double-whammy PC. One thing I noticed is that many of my peers who grew up in the 70s and 80s were left alone by their parents when it came to ideological matters. Most of their parents were around 30 yrs old in 1967, so they were too old to be part of Counterculture(though too young to be part of WWII generation). These parents were not overtly ideological(for the most part) and left the kids to develop freely.

But things have changed over the years with new batch of parents, especially among the upper-middle-class and above, being very well-educated(which is to say well-indoctrinated). These parents are not content to just provide a nice and loving environment for their kids. They insist on instilling their children with their own self-righteous ideology and iconography(mainly around Magic Negroes, Holy Homos, and Wonderful Jews). This ideological domineering is all the more effective because of the passive/aggressive style of parenting. Parents prior to boomerism weren’t very ‘nice’, huggy-wuggy, and friendly with their kids. So, kids grew apart from their parents with the passing of years. But, the PC parents want to be ‘nice’ and ‘understanding’. This bonds them closer to their children and makes the children want to please their parents more. So, if the parents are boo-hoo weepy-poo about MLK and ‘racism’, the kids want to play along to please their ‘nice’ and ‘understanding’ parents.

And things have gotten much worse due to the rise of PC. At least throughout the 70s and even 80s, the prevailing value among many Liberal parents and teachers was freedom of speech. Consider the Liberal support of Salman Rushdie when Iranian clergy put a Fatwa on him over SATANIC VERSES. Back then, despite the campaign against ‘racism’, Liberalism was strongly defined by ACLU-style libertarianism that defended free speech and expression as a good in and of themselves. (Also, culture hadn't gone totally bonkers with stuff like 50 genders and homomania.) But with the rise of PC, the correctness of views became more important than freedom of speech or individuality. Also, because PC has become such a determinant in careerism — consider the fate of James Damore at Google — , ambitious parents who want their kids to attend elite schools and have successive careers apply extra pressure, consciously or subconsciously, to make their kids assent to the rules of PC.

So, what is the solution? The ideal of the less-educated parents? No, that would be like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Instead, we need to create a new intellectual culture that favors freedom, honesty, and truth over correctness, self-righteousness, and craven opportunism.