The South in the American Civil War fought both FOR and AGAINST slavery — Manhood as Psychological Well-Being — Threat to Manhood by Other Manhoods

The Truer Narrative of the America Civil War must be…

The South fought both for and against slavery. How could that have been the case? It’s because there are more than one kind of slavery.

In the most obvious sense, the South fought to maintain the system of Social Slavery that kept the black race in bondage(though some blacks gained legal freedom). The agenda of the South was clearly unjust, especially given the founding principles of the American Republic. Many in the South invoked various rationales to justify slavery. Some invoked the Old Testament where even the laws of God allowed for owning people as chattel. Some argued slavery, though hardly ideal, was nevertheless an improvement for blacks who’d only known savagery(and crueler forms of slavery) in the Dark Continent. Others argued that slavery was just a phase that would gradually fade as the Southern economy grew and as blacks became more attuned to the demands of complex civilization. Whatever the merits of such arguments, the fact was slavery as an institution had been introduced to the New World out of greed. And given that the moral basis for America’s independence from the British Empire was liberty and freedom, the argument for slavery soured the spirit of American experiment.

One might argue that the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians was a graver 'sin', but in some ways, black slavery was less excusable. Regardless of whether the ‘genocide’ of Indians was worse or not, the fact was it was ‘necessary’(or a necessary evil). The American Enterprise simply couldn’t have happened without the removal of the native Indians from the ‘fruited plains’. In contrast, blacks were not necessary to create America. True, black labor was, for a time, hugely profitable for the white slave-owners whose economy was intricately linked with the North and Europe. But even without black slave labor, an expanding and developing America would have been possible with white immigration and reproduction. Canada and Australia developed without black labor. Though America would have been slower to develop in the early stages without slavery, its long-term prospects would have been much better. There would have been no horribly destructive Civil War.

Also, if blacks were a net economic gain in the first half of the American experience, they became a net loss thereafter. Also, fear of blacks distorted so much of white culture as well as black culture. If US had no blacks, such fears would never have materialized. Also, white manhood would have been secure and healthier as whites would have dominated all sports and wouldn’t have had to worry about black crime and jungle fever(and the attendant cuckery among white men reduced to 'white boys'). So, in the larger scale of things, the short-term greed of relying on black slave labor proved to be America’s biggest mistake and undoing... just like Europe now faces the greatest threat to its existence not from Muslims but from black Africans. (But people prefer to blame Islam and Muslims that aren’t deemed as sacred as blacks[and homos] in Western PC that is controlled by Jews.)

Also, it was bound to linger as a moral stain, paradoxically because most modern people are amnesiac. Now, if people's memories are so poor, wouldn’t they know less about the past and be less burdened with historical ‘guilt’? Yes, IF people know NOTHING about the past. Surely, if people today knew nothing of slavery, they couldn’t be made to feel ‘guilty’ about it. But, even as most people know little about the past, they know just enough from public education, TV, and movies to have a vague idea of what happened long ago. But because their knowledge is so thin, there is hardly an understanding of the past and its different sets of values and assumptions. Instead, the complex past has been reduced to a few sacred icons, pat slogans, and simple Manichean narratives. Therefore, people today find it inconceivable that those living in the past were just as sure of their ethos as current progs are of theirs. PC makes people of the Current Year feel that they are the ‘most evolved’ and their way is the only way. So, discovering that the past was a world racked with a host of ‘evils’ is shocking and triggering to them. It is no wonder that so many Current Year zealots are eager to tear down any monument that reeks of past 'evils'. Lacking empathy and imagination, Current Year progs believe that people in the past just should have known better and intuitively arrived at all the tenets of today's PC. Having morally failed to do so, the past must simply be expunged and eradicated from memory except as evil spirits summoned in annual rituals of scapegoating(or scapewhiting). In this sense, the sorry fact of American Progressivism is that people who claim to be most empathetic have no real empathy at all.

Indeed, they confuse empathy with selective favoritism of certain specially designated groups. True Empathy isn’t about feeling special affection or concern for groups favored by PC. Real empathy is about trying to understand different individuals, peoples, cultures, places, and times on their own terms(even if you disagree with or are appalled by those terms). PC is too judgmental to be empathetic. It is too busy screaming ‘racist’, ‘sexist’, ‘homophobic’, ‘transphobic’, ‘xenophobic’, and etc. to understand why different peoples in different times and places thought and acted differently. So, even as so-called Liberals claim to own empathy, they really have none. Their idea of ‘empathy’ simply means they have blind faith and special affection for three special groups sanctified by PC: Jews, blacks, and homos. Also, this special sympathy is based not on knowledge or understanding of actual Jews, blacks, and homos but on trite symbolisms of black sainthood, Jewish nobility of eternal suffering, and homo angelic fruitcakery.

The fact that Ta-Nehisi Coates(aka The Nasty Coates) has gotten so much mileage with white libby-diberals is because he gives them what they crave: Lots of Purple Prose about suppressed or denied black sanctity that deserves and needs the love of goody-good white people. He is Little Orphan Nehisi. Real empathy, in contrast, is the ability to probe and understand why another people(or people in the past) felt justified and validated in their ways and means so different from ours in the present. But today’s PC dolts are so full of themselves(and so addicted to the cult of ‘progress’ as measured by adherence to every new screeching fad) that they find it too difficult to even ponder the possibility as to why some people don’t believe in nonsense like ‘gay marriage’. And don’t try discussing logic and facts with such idiots.

PC is less about ideas and values than about ‘sacralized’ identities, or the Cult of Identity. So, if a certain group or identity has been deemed ‘noble’ or ‘sacred’, its demands must either be met or championed. The right-or-wrong is decided not by morality, facts, or reason but by the simple fact that some groups are ‘more equal than others’. So, even if blacks misbehave at Starbucks or act like stupid monkeys at a college graduation, the fault is not with their behavior but with those people(especially white) who treated blacks as they would have treated anyone else. By facts and logic, Starbucks’ policy is that people who occupy a table must order something. You can’t just loiter as non-buying customers. This rule applies equally to all individuals. So, if whites or non-blacks had acted like those idiot blacks, they would have been asked to leave. But apparently, such rules don’t apply to blacks because PC deems the Negroes to be sacred. So, it makes no sense discussing right-or-wrong since PC says blacks are right-no-matter-what and anyone who displeases blacks must be wrong. And the same goes for the Florida college graduation. The rules of the graduation require all students of all races to show respect and act with dignity appropriate for the ceremony. (They can party and celebrate afterwards.) The rules apply to all students equally. But such rules don’t apply to blacks because PC says blacks are right-no-matter-what. So, never mind principles and rules. If blacks feel like doing something, they have some special right or license to do so. If anyone is ‘wrong’, it is he or she who deigns to apply the same rules to blacks as to other groups. How dare he treat blacks like he would any other people? Doesn’t he know that blacks are always ‘right’ and that anyone who displeases them is automatically ‘wrong’?

And the same rule applies to Jews and Palestinians/Iranians. Whatever Jews do, it’s ‘right’. Jews can steal uranium from the US. Jews can shoot up USS Liberty. Jews can cook up lies to invade Iraq. Jews can kill bushels of Palestinians. All those actions are ‘right’ because Jews are right always. And Iran is always wrong no matter what it does. Even if Iran complies with the nuclear deal, the Jew-run US will find yet more excuses to declare it ‘wrong’. And of course, homos have always been right, even when they acted irresponsibly in spreading HIV all over in endless bath-house orgies. That is how PC really works. Its bogus ‘empathy’ is really about Emphasis of certain Favored Groups over all others. It should be called ‘emphasy’ than ‘empathy’.

Anyway, there was another side to the Civil War. While it’s true that the South was fighting to maintain slavery as a legal institution, in a profound way they were fighting against the prospect of biological slavery under blacks. White Southerners feared the specter of biological slavery that might result from black emancipation. Once blacks were freed and granted the same rights as whites, there was no guarantee that the two races would become equal and live side-by-side in harmony. Now, if blacks happened to be merely white people with black skin, co-existence might have been possible. Caste or no caste, the reason why India was able to exist as a civilization for so long was because darker-skinned Indians are not all that much different from light-skinned Indians in strength or temperament. Despite genetic separation by caste, your average lower-caste ‘dotkin’ isn’t likely to be all that different from a higher-caste ‘dotkin’. Indeed, to an outsider, most ‘dotkins’ of whatever caste look like other ‘dotkins’. But this was simply not the case between whites and blacks in the South(or in the North following the Great Migration). Blacks were not simply white people with darker skin. They were noticeably more muscular, rowdier, self-centered, egotistical, and more aggressive. Because of the fear and obedience instilled into them over several generations through means ranging from blatant to subtle, there was a chance that blacks might not immediately go jungle upon emancipation. But over time, as blacks would grow to realize that they are stronger, meaner, and more aggressive and that whites are anxious, fearful, and nervous, their attitude and behavior were bound to change drastically, and then the full reversion to Jungle would happen. The first great sign of this was Jack Johnson, the tough Negro who beat up all the white males and humped tons of white women. In one way, Johnson was a tough and resilient challenger against racial discrimination and white supremacy. But in another way, he was the template of the looming biological slavery of whites under black supremacy. Johnson-ism meant black guys would whup and humiliate white males who would be robbed of their manhood and therefore their womenfolk as well(just like bigger and taller white and black American soldiers robbed little Japanese guys of their manhood and womenfolk after their defeat in WWII. To this day, Japanese men have not recovered from their humiliation. They are a race of dogs.) As Black Pigeon Speaks argues, women have weak sense of tribal loyalty. They just go with the Power or the Winner:

And as white manhood would be humiliated by black manhood that dominates sports and street violence, there would come a time when white men would become the biological slave-cucks of blacks, and white women would lose respect for white men and surrender to jungle fever and accept ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. (Consider the blonde girl in the movie SPECTACULAR NOW who dumps her white boyfriend and goes with a big athletic Negro who later even physically threatens the 'pussy-ass white boy' who is reduced to giving him tips on how to make the white girl love him better. Total cuckery, but this is what the Jew-run Hollywood promotes to white kids as a moral-racial ideal.) Of course, do-goody naive white Liberals and cunning Jews(who sought the mental enslavement of the white race that was to be turned into cattle in service to Jewish supremacism) understood how these fears were a pediment to social change. If whites, especially the males, understood the full implications of black emancipation and racial integration, they would have realized the end-result would be biological slavery under tougher, stronger, and rowdier blacks. So, 'anti-racist' radicals sought to assuage white fears by presenting blacks as sexless noble Uncle Toms who were always falsely accused of raping white women. Or consider how the early interracial propaganda focused on white man and black woman when, in fact, the main threat was that white men would lose white women to black men.

Cunning Jews played it both ways, presenting blacks as both sexless angels who would never rape anyone AND sexy dancers whose performances would liberate white folks from puritanical repression. Even today, Jews play both tropes at once, and so many white people still fall for the nonsense. White kids are bombarded with both the (To Kill a)MOCKINGBIRD and the MANDINGO tropes about blacks. There is no rhyme or reason to any of this, but then, PC is less about right-and-wrong of ideas and facts than about the righteous sanctity of certain favored groups. Since PC deems that blacks are always right, the trope that makes blacks out to be sexless spiritual saints(as in GREEN MILE) is 'right' but so is the trope that says blacks are SO awesome as masterful big-donged muscled super-studs(or big-booty-shaking hot-mama skank-ass ho’s) that other races must sensually surrender to blackness and join in the jungle jive of vibrant liberation. PC warps moral logic. For this reason, PC is best understood as a neo-religion. After all, it is in religion that God is always right, even when He seems to do wrong. The idea is that God is so above us insignificant earthly creatures that He lives by a truth and logic far beyond us. It would be wrong for us to demand consistent logic from Him, as Job realized. Likewise, PC says it is futile for us to invoke reason, logic, and facts in relation to blacks, Jews, and homos. Doing so would be ‘racist’, ‘antisemitic’, or ‘homophobic’. We must honor, worship, and serve them on the basis of faith.

Anyway, there was no guarantee that the long-term result of ending socio-legal slavery in the South would result in racial equality and harmony. It could very well lead to white people becoming biologically enslaved to stronger, tougher, more aggressive, more muscular, and more dangerous blacks. This danger was bound to increase as America became more individualistic, hedonistic, and vulgar, not least due to black influences in music, comedy, and attitudes. If the US were a theocracy or strict ‘ideocracy’(one that metes out harsh punishment to those who act out of line, as in Cuba where blacks better behave or else), perhaps black aggression could have been held in check even upon emancipation. But as the US was a fast-changing democracy with increasing freedom and liberties in the pursuit of happiness, it was only a matter of time before blacks lost all their inhibitions and made ‘muh dick’ and 'muh fist' the central themes of their culture. And today, in the 21st century, we are living in a thoroughly pornfied culture when even kids watching Disney are really partaking of a form of kiddie porn.

Everything that D.W. Griffith prophesied in THE BIRTH OF A NATION came true. If that movie made many people uncomfortable in the past because it seemed like paranoid fantasy, it is bound to make people uncomfortable today because it now seems so factual. The movie said freedom is bound to turn too many blacks into uninhibited thugs and pimps, and guess what the main cultural expression of blacks is today? Rap music, the main message of which is ‘muh dick’ and ‘muh fist(or gun)’. And look at the state of black-run communities in Gary, Detroit, Baltimore, St. Louis, parts of Chicago, Newark, and etc. And the movie warned about naive white cuck-politicians and cunning light-skinned Negroes who shamelessly hustle suckers into buying into fantasy of racial harmony. D.W. Griffith’s THE BIRTH OF A NATION was a great prophetic work. What he warned eventually came to be. Blacks have reverted to jungle savagery. Their music is rap, their dance is ‘twerking’, and their culture is thuggery. And Pop Culture is now mostly about Jungle Fever. And not only in the US but in Canada and EU.

Anyway, the loss of manhood and cuckery is a form of slavery. The dark fact is white manhood cannot survive integration with harder-muscled, meaner-tempered, and bigger-donged Negroes. Eventually, white men will turn into ‘white boy’ cucks, and white women will go with Negroes and their wombs will be colonized to produce the likes of Colin Kaepernick whose anti-white virulence is less about Racial Injustice than sheer contempt for wussy-ass whitey. After all, his mother rejected the men of her own race and chose to have a child with a tough Negro. Even though his black father abandoned him and even though a nice white family went to the trouble of raising him, Kaepernick associated whiteness with wussy weakness and associated blackness with power and manhood. Blackness = studly power that conquers white vaginas and wombs. Whiteness = cucky weakness that raises a child of a black guy who humped a white woman and took off. Due to their wilder nature, blacks don’t much appreciate weakness, no matter how kindly and caring it is. They instinctively see it as ‘faggoty-ass’ and ‘lame’. So, all the love Kaepernick got from his adoptive white family hardly left a positive impression on him. He just wanted to get away from such wussy weakness and be accepted by the badass brothas.

When white people brought over a stronger and meaner race to be slaves in the US, they got caught in a Moral Trap. Socio-legal Slavery controlled blacks and kept their savagery in check, but it was unjust and sometimes cruel. But freeing the slaves meant eventual disaster for the white race because too many blacks happen to be built like Mike Tyson, Lennox Lewis, and Jim Brown. And too many black women are crazy and loud 'biatches' whose antics in music and dance encourage the most savage and trashy behavior among women of all races. Abraham Lincoln sensed all this, which is why he said, “We have to free the ‘groids’ and then ship them back to Africa, because, if we don’t, they will kick our butts and hump our daughters.”

It is time to face the truth. The South was in a bind. True, they did fight to preserve ugly social slavery. But they were trying to prevent horrid biological slavery of white race being physically and sexually dominated by tougher and nastier Negroes.
Furthermore, it is about time we understood the importance of manhood. It's time to assess the harms of Toxic Cuckery. A society can’t be healthy unless its men feel manly pride and are respected by their womenfolk. Indeed, it’s often been said that one of the humiliating things about slavery was that black manhood was trampled upon. As black men had to shuck-and-jive before the massuh, who also might enjoy some fun with a chocolate-titted mama, they could not be full men. This was especially humiliating because black slaves knew they could kick the white boy’s ass if they were to face each other one-on-one. But whites had all the guns, and the laws were on their side. Blacks had to suffer the humiliation of being ordered around by white men who were weaker than them. So, in order for black men to gain the pride of manhood, they needed to be freed. So far so good. But the problem with black freedom was that black manhood now posed a serious threat to white manhood. Due to the BAMMAMA — blacks are more muscular and more aggressive — factor, legal equality between blacks and whites was bound to lead to biological supremacy of blacks over whitse. This meant blacks kicking white butts in sports, and this was a big deal in the modern world where so much of social, communal, national, and racial pride & prestige are invested in and expressed through sports. White male defeat to blacks in sports meant whites losing their iconic status as Real Men. Is it any wonder that so many white wombs get colonized by black men while so many white guys are turning into cucks and wussies?

Indeed, Antifa is like radical cuckery. These white boys are so invested in their own inferiority and submission at the feet of blacks that they get triggered by any white guy who says NO to such humiliation. To Antifa, the rightful place for whites in the West is as biological slaves to blacks who are deemed superior both morally(due to Slavery and Jim Crow narrative) and physically(as they easily kick white butt in sports and conquer white wombs). And yet, by beating up 'nazis' to protect blacks and other minorities, Antifa guys also feel as alphas, without whom blacks would presumably not be safe. So, Antifa guys both worship blacks as their superiors(in holy victimhood and badass style) and patronize blacks as their inferiors(or a powerless people in need of white knights to defend them).

Well, if black male psychology suffered so terribly during the slavery era because black men were denied full manhood and the respect of their women, the same logic applies to whites today. White society cannot be psychologically healthy unless white men have their manhood back. But this is impossible with racial integration because biological slavery will reduce white guys into cucky ‘white boys’ at the feet of tougher and meaner blacks as their eternal biological massuhs. And the fall of white manhood will mean the fall of the white race. White women will not respect ‘loser men’, which is what white men become when integrated with black males.
There are many reasons for the decline of the white male in America, especially among the working class, and one reason has to do with loss of manhood vis-a-vis blacks. Both Abraham Lincoln and D.W. Griffith were right. They both acknowledged the problems of slavery but also understood that freedom would lead to a new kind of slavery. It is too bad that whites in the South failed to come to terms with Honest Abe and settle on some grand plan to free the blacks and send them back to Africa where the Negroes could harass hippos but not white folks.

A Response to "Warrior-Hero of the West: Erich Hartmann, the Blond Knight of Germany" by Karl Nemmersdorf

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/05/08/warrior-hero-of-the-west-erich-hartmann-the-blond-knight-of-germany/#comment-310285

 “Yet, the way he performed his duty, with courage and honor—and deadly efficiency—made him the highest scoring ace in history and one of the genuine heroes of Western history. Erich Hartmann is a splendid example of the qualities peculiar to Western Faustian man, such as an acute sense of individuality, iron willpower, and utmost daring.”

Sheesh. So. The Occidental Observer is now a full-blown Neo-Nazi site? What a waste of potential. It's almost as if TOO wants to live up to the smear campaign level against it by ADL and SPLC. But then, if TOO is really has a hardon for Nazis, it's not much of smear campaign, is it, to call it a Neo-Nazi site?

Look, I understand that many men who fought for the Wehmrmacht had sterling qualities as soldiers. And I can’t blame the soldiers because soldiers of all nations were recruited, trained, and sent to battle. German soldiers were no different. From movies like DAS BOOT, STALINGRAD, and DOWNFALL, we can see lots of good men, tough warriors with the right stuff. And we know soldiers must do as they are told. US soldiers were no different. When ordered to incinerate entire cities in Germany, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam, they had no choice but to follow orders. Soldiers are drilled and trained to obey. Therefore, we can’t blame soldiers for national policy. They can only be judged by how they performed in the battlefield.

But soldiers like the one featured in the the Occidental Observer article also serve as a cautionary tale that small virtues are not enough for a morally just order. Courage, honor, loyalty, dedication, camaraderie, and toughness are good virtues to have. But those qualities don’t decide the destiny of a nation. They don't ask the big questions. When a nation is ruled by a pathological nut like Hitler, even the best of men in the military are used to invade other nations, drop bombs on civilians, and even commit mass genocide.

There were plenty of Good Men in the German military, Japanese military, US military, Soviet military, and etc. The movie ENEMY BELOW shows that your average German soldier or sailor was not a monster with horns sprouting from his head. He was likely a man of courage, honor, and patriotism willing to fight and die for his country. But lots of Germans with such virtues didn't prevent WWII, the mass destruction of Europe, and the tragic immolation of Germany. They were mindful of being dutiful and committed but mindless about the bigger picture of a nation, the future of which was to be decided to psychopaths.

In a complex world, especially if you’re a member of a powerful nation that can destroy weaker nations, you must ask… “What kind people at the top are making policy that will affect countless lives?” Too many Good Germans blindly trusted Hitler because he had charisma and could give spellbinding speeches. To be sure, Hitler did do some good things, that is before he decided to throw caution to the winds and trigger a world war. In the end, what a sick tragedy that SO MANY GOOD MEN were wasted in a terrible war ignited by a pathological egotistical lunatic whose grand vision was to invade Russia, wipe out tens of millions, and turn survivors into illiterate helots.

And of course, we have the same problem now in the US. Lots of US soldiers are good guys, men of virtue and honor. But did US soldiers have a choice when they were ordered to invade Iraq? Did they have agency and true moral understanding? No, they were fed lies by the Jew-run Media and Judeo-Nazi Neocon warmongers whose agenda was to goad stupid goyim into fighting and dying in Wars for Israel and the Empire of Judea.

Sadly, all those US soldiers, though possessed of small virtues, lacked a larger understanding of the world and failed to realize that they were just toy soldiers of pathological crazy Jews(the new hitlers) who now control America.

We can acknowledge the fact that there were courageous and honorable men who fought for Nazi Germany. But it is morally disingenuous to to discuss that reality without considering the larger context of how all those Good Men were manipulated and ultimately destroyed by a pathological lunatic in a war that came to consume 40 to 50 million European lives.

By the way, ‘Judeo-Nazis’ is apt because, while ‘Nazi’ in the historical sense refers to Germans of the 30s and WWII, it can mean any group that acts like ‘nazis’ in the generic sense.
Now, how did Nazis act? Imperialist, supremacist, contemptuous, murderous, genocidal, pathological, ruthless, devious. Then, any existing group that acts most like that are generic nazis.

Well, what power acts most like that today? Jewish supremacist power, of course. Even Haaretz used the term ‘Judeo-Nazi’ to describe certain kinds of Jews.

https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-not-neo-nazis-judeo-nazis-1.5250205

Today, it is Jews who are most committed to spreading hatred all around the world. Jews use MSM, their ministry of propaganda, to spread HATE against Russians, Syrians, Iranians, Palestinians, and white gentiles. But even as Judeo-Nazis spit  on the faces of white gentiles, they also order dumb goyim to fight and die in Wars for Israel.

Germans went crazy in WWII period. But Jews also need to look in the mirror and realize the sickness in their own souls. How ironic that Jews, who invoke the holocaust 24/7, have become the very supremacist scum that they've condemned for so long.

Three Kinds of Treason: The Good, the Bad, and the Clueless — The West, the Rest, and Rebellion — James Comey the Scummy — Delusional Symbolic Morality of Justice Junkies

Let’s consider the three kinds of Treason(though surely there are other kinds). The first is a kind of higher loyalty directed by conscience and moral compass. The second is driven mainly by greed & opportunism(and cravenness). The third kind of treason feels like the first kind(an act of conscience) to the traitor but is actually manipulated by a devious power with lock on media and academia. In the modern West, many white people have found themselves in one of the three categories.

Generally speaking, ‘Treason’ is a dirty word. But it is also a relative concept. Benedict Arnold is considered to have been a traitor, but one could argue that the thirteen colonies were treasonous against the Mother Country and the King. Robert E. Lee was loyal to Virginia, but Virginia was deemed to be treasonous to the Union. Also, it wasn't unusual for a person to have divided loyalties. During the Civil War, a mother could find one of her sons fighting for the North and the other fighting for the South. Who was the traitor in the family?

And in a way, many great leaps of human discovery and advancement were the products of a kind of treason. Mythologies are filled with themes of righteous or liberating treason. Young gods rebel against older gods and take over the divine realm. Prometheus, half-man/half-god, betrayed the gods in stealing their fire and passing it to mankind. Christianity could not have been born without ‘treasonous’ Jews such as Jesus, Peter, and Paul whose conception of God’s will and design was seen as heretical, blasphemous, and intolerable to the Jewish community.
And America was born of Inspired and Idealistic Treason against the supposed Tyranny of the British Empire(and the Mother Country). All great revolutions were acts of rebellion, indeed treason, against the existing order. One could also say all of life is the product of treason. A daughter, the beloved of her father, goes off with another man and becomes his. The movie FATHER OF THE BRIDE illustrates the father’s ambivalence in giving his daughter away. (This may be a bigger problem when the groom is a man of another race, as in OTHELLO when the white hussy goes off with a blackamoor). And so often in life, the son finally becomes a man by standing up to his father in an act of defiance. Even as the father or father-figure resents such rebellion, there is also a sense of pride in the realization that the child has grown into a man and can finally think and act for himself. It is why John Wayne characters in RED RIVER and THE SEARCHERS come to grudgingly accept and even admire the younger partner as having grown into full manhood with a mind and will of his own. Without that element of rebellion against the father, a man will never be his own man. He will never be a wolf and remain a dog all his life.

Indeed, this was one reason why the West advanced far ahead of the East. In Asia, there was far greater emphasis on sons to remain obedient to their fathers and on subjects to remain loyal to their masters/rulers. In China and Japan, there was nothing worse than being accused of disloyalty and treason. And in India, the complex caste system demanded strict adherence to rules of social belonging and obligations. Anyone deviating from his caste duties could come under the harshest punishment. It was seen as treason against the cosmic will, the Karma.

Things were somewhat different in the West. While it also placed great emphasis on loyalty and fealty to kings, lords, church, and patriarchs, there was more leeway and wiggle room for individuality, independence, and liberty. Part of the reason was genetic. White people were innately less servile than East Asians. (If racial and cultural uniformity may have encouraged conformism in East Asia — people who look alike tend to think and act alike — , excessive diversity in India may have necessitated an iron regimen of conformism to maintain the order. Diversity + Freedom = Chaos. Therefore, to keep the peace among so many different ethnic groups, the spiritual-cultural order of India had to insist on the most obsessive adherence to core caste principles of Hinduism. If the Jewish Covenant spiritualized the ethnic uniqueness of the Tribe, Hindu Karma spiritualized one's caste obligations as a sacred duty. The Covenant united Jews in body and soul. In the most intricate way, Karma both separated and interwove the lives of so many castes of Hindus. Perhaps, Jews might have devised something like a caste system had they come to rule over vast numbers of gentiles but, unlike the Aryans who gained dominance over India, Jews were generally surrounded by far more powerful empires. Thus, the main obsession of Jews was preservation of their own identity. But in today's world, Jewish Supremacists have become the Master Race overlords in the World, and in the rapidly diversifying West we are seeing the rise of neo-caste-systems that are unavoidable with excessive Diversity. Earlier, Latin America already and organically ended up with a caste system even though such wasn't explicitly devised as had been in India long ago.) Another reason for the greater spirit of rebellion in the West owed to Christianity that said there is a Higher Power and Higher Truth than anything devised or known by man. Indeed, Christianity itself produced a rebellion called Protestantism that denounced the corruption of the Catholic Church. Catholic Church accused Protestants of heresy and treason, but Protestants accused the Church of having betrayed God.
Also, unlike pagan gods who weren't all-powerful and compromised by their failings, Christianity said there is only One God and One Truth; and Jesus was the Son of God, the Perfect Man sent to Earth to die for mankind’s sins. So, even as a European might serve his King or Lord, he believed there is a Truth and Justice far greater than any temporal master on Earth. As such, it was justified in the eyes of the righteous to betray one’s lord to serve the higher good and higher glory. Such a betrayal is at the center of BECKET where the eponymous hero(played by Richard Burton) betrays his friend(played by Peter O’Toole) and king for the higher truth. And in CHARIOTS OF FIRE, the devout sprinter believes he must go against God and Country to remain faithful to the greater glory of God.


Of course, a people who are overly rebellious and treasonous will cause social chaos and havoc. But a people who are overly servile and obedient will not produce the kind of individuals with the audacity to think differently. After all, all great change are bold acts of 'treason' against the status quo. To achieve the power of flight, one has to defy what most people presume to be impossible. A short story by Ray Bradbury, "The Flying Machine", surmises that China fell behind the West because its rulers and elites favored status quo, harmony, and continuity over leaps and bounds in history. So, even as the flying machine is marveled at, the inventor is to be put to death because his wondrous contraption violates the existing harmony. Such momentous leap in possibility may well upend the entire social order... indeed the kind that enveloped Great Britain in the Industrial Revolution. That was a profound rebellion against tradition and nature. Ironically, the fact that the Romantics denounced Industrialization’s war on nature and countryside in a poetic and passionate way shows that they too were imbued with the spirit of defiance. Industry defied nature with machinery, and Romantics defied machinery with imagination.

We can go on and on with many other examples, but the point is, even as Treason is usually regarded in a negative light, it(or an aspect of it) is intrinsic to every great change. In the Ayn-Randian myth-making, the great innovative hero can’t help but upset the existing order by envisioning something no one had thought before. As such, he is met with fierce resistance and opposition from conservative, conventional, or controlling forces that insist on continuity of established forms, ideas, and means.


For some people, an act of treason is a moral necessity. A famous example involved the German officers who conspired to assassinate Adolf Hitler. Though their plan was clearly an act of treason, the conspirators felt they must do something to bring an end to Der Fuhrer’s madness. (Those in the Deep State who are now conspiring against Trump may be seen by some as today's 'Good Germans', but if the German officers conspired against Hitler for his reckless warmongering that brought Germany to the brink of ruin, today's Deep State operatives are the warmongers who hate Trump because he spoke in favor of peace with Russia, no more Middle East wars, and limited nationalism than for boundless globalist neo-imperialist hegemony.) More recently, there was Edward Snowden who spilled the beans on the Deep State to expose its abuses and general contempt for the American public and other nations, even supposed allies. Of course, James Comey would have us believe that he too acted out of ‘higher loyalty’ to the greater good, but revelations show that his loyalty was to the Deep State. He is a sleazebag and slimeball, and one wonders how such a lowlife could have ascended so high in government. But then, it makes perfect sense because any kind of complex organization usually favors yes-men, toadies, ass-kissers, boot-lickers, and shmoozers over mavericks, free thinkers, and men of honesty. Comey’s combination of craven careerism and schoolmarm-ish moralism not only made him an ideal candidate to climb the ladder but the kind of fool who could easily dupe himself into thinking he is a real-life Atticus Finch. In fact, Comey was always a teacher’s pet whose horizons as careerist and pseudo-moralist never veered from the conventional path of what-to-do and what-to-think. It goes to show that intelligence and diligence are not enough to create a real human being. Comey is a classic company-man-type. He is a suit, an empty suit at that devoid of real soul and agency. He dutifully swallowed all the a-b-c’s of do-goody PC without question, led the life of a cucky-wuck hubby-and-dad, and climbed the ‘corporate ladder’ of the Deep State. Thus, for Comey the Deep State drone, it has always been all-for-the-company and in the spirit of PC ‘progressivism’, the verity and validity of which he never gave any consideration because his personality is of the type that never deviates from the path chosen for him by others.

In contrast, Edward Snowden, while no saint, really did embark on a course of action that took courage and conscience. One may argue Snowden was overly idealistic, naive, egoistical, or judgmental, but the fact is he fully understood that his life would never be the same after spilling the beans on the NSA. It would especially be risky because he would make Obama’s administration look bad. At least if Bush or McCain had been president, Snowden’s act of betrayal might have gotten sympathetic coverage from the ‘Liberal’ Media or the ‘Progressive’ community. But because he exposed the Deep State under Obama, almost all the powers-that-be in media, academia, and Deep State(all controlled by Judeo-Nazi Democrats) decided to collude to make his life as miserable as possible.
Snowden’s deed was clearly an act of treason but also an act of counter-treason as Snowden believed that the Deep State had betrayed the trust of the American people and the protections guaranteed by the Constitution. His act was truly that of higher loyalty. He didn’t do it for money, privilege, or power but to expose the truth of the Deep State and what it was capable of in not only spying on American citizens but subverting foreign nations, all the communication networks of which had been infiltrated or sabotaged by the US government. Snowden exposed that the US as the Lone Superpower functions not as a democracy but operates as a Deepocracy. Power and Righteousness(as the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation) have not only corrupted but blinded the people in the Deep State to their own arrogance, corruption, and foulness. They are worse than organized criminals who, at the very least, know they are crooked scum of the earth. In contrast, all the vile deeds of the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the Pentagon are whitewashed with the conceit of the US as the necessary policeman, judge, and jury of the world.

Men like Snowden and Joachim Fest’s father(who refused to serve the Nazi regime) are relatively rare. Even people who want to do likewise haven’t got the spine to stick their necks out. This is understandable for obvious reasons in tyrannical societies where those suspected of treason or disloyalty could be locked up or even executed. Because Stalin destroyed even those who were loyal to him, a climate of fear gripped the USSR, and as such, few dared to say or do anything that carried even the slightest whiff of dissent. (Soviet government was bound to be paranoid and repressive because everyone involved in the creation of the New Order was radical, ruthless, cunning, devious, and subversive. Unlike the American Republic that was formed more-or-less by like-minded, like-cultured, and like-blooded Anglos, the 'Russian' Revolution was made by groups intoxicated with extreme ideology and/or extreme personality. Stalin knew it was either his faction or the other faction. And he knew about the nasty personality of Jews, which he countered with his Georgian-Caucasian bandit cutthroat cunning that totally blindsided Jews who thought they could outwit him.) But then, freedom + opportunity can also turn people into craven cowards. This may seem counter-intuitive because freedom and opportunity connote individuality, high spirits, and daring. But freedom and opportunity also mean possibility of great success in wealth and privilege. And those who become addicted to and defined by wealth and privilege become deathly afraid of losing their trophies and treasures by saying the ‘wrong’ word or doing the ‘wrong’ thing. Consider the sudden fall of Donald Sterling from grace and fortune simply because he told his mulatto mistress to stop whoring around too much with Negro ball-players. That's all it took to bring down someone that big. So, in a way, a very libertine America has created a class of uber-successful cowards and dorks. While they have the individual spirit and drive to make great gains in business or some endeavor, their addiction to success makes them fearful of bad publicity. Since one’s reputation is determined by the prevailing PC and the media(almost entirely controlled by Jews in the West), the rich and/or successful dare not step on the wrong toes.

So, the US is a paradoxical society where freedom to succeed has actually diminished freedom of thought among the very successful. If you can’t rise too high or make too much money, it’s no great loss to say the ‘wrong’ word and be demoted or fired. Suppose you have a job making $80,000 a year but get fired for courageously sticking up for your beliefs and have to settle for a job making $50,000. It’s a loss but not something totally momentous. But suppose you have an opportunity to make $100 million but could lose it all by saying the ‘wrong’ word... like Don Imus with the 'nappy-headed hos' remark. You’re likely to play it safe and just go along with the Official Dogma and Approved Narrative(that define who is respectable and who isn’t) to make the big bucks. Cucks make the bucks.
It is then no wonder that so many successful people just caved to ‘gay marriage’. As Jews control the media, academia, law firms, and government, they got to decide what is ‘more evolved’ and what is ‘hateful’ or ‘irrational’. Ill repute could lead to shunning by the ‘right kind of people’, and therefore, one learns to play along and go along... as the eponymous character intended to do in BARRY LYNDON to win favor among the aristocrats.

The second kind of Treason involves those without conscience. They will betray anyone just for personal greed. Take Paulie in THE GODFATHER who, it turns out, cut a deal with the Tataglias for extra cash. Guys like Paulie lack not only moral conscience but even the slightest modicum of honor. Real slimeballs, they will do ANYTHING to get ‘what is mine’. This is a characteristic commonly found among Southern Italians, Greeks, and Hispanics. Greasy and sleazy, such types are incapable of shame, let alone remorse, as they stoop to any level to get ‘what is mine’. They usually have the personalities of toadies and sidekicks. They are like the couple of hoodlums in MIDNIGHT RUN who serve as a foil to the pair made up of Robert De Niro and Charles Grodin.

De Niro’s character won’t take a bribe, and Grodin’s character got in trouble because he did the right thing(like Edward Snowden). In contrast, the two toady hoodlums will do just about anything to get ‘what is mine’ in their sordid world of crime and corruption. And the other bounty hunter, Marvin, is also a sleazebag. At one point, he is willing to sell the Duke(Grodin) to the gang boss for a million dollars. (He must be an Irish pig.)

The world has TOO MANY people who will betray their convictions, principles, and values just to get ‘what is mine’. The criminal world is full of them, but then, so is the legitimate world. People just love money, success, privilege, and pleasure at any cost. Look at the Mormons who preach morality but are always willing to cut deals with Big Money to rake in the dough. Mormons are fake moralists. Their clean-cut lifestyles create the impression of morality but really serve as a shield to hide all their materialist-driven compromises. Look at the total scum Mitt Romney. Or conehead Evan McMullin. But then, US elite society is filled with these careerist-opportunist liars who betray their core principles just to get ‘what is mine’. Just how is it that all those Republican Conservatives who supposedly believe in Family Values didn’t raise the slightest opposition to the agenda of Homomania? Where was their conviction?
The fact is they were mainly concerned with their careers in a nation where most top industries and institutions are controlled by Jews who can make or break anyone via the media that decree who is of good or ill repute. As Jews promoted Homomania as the neo-religion(even replacement for Christianity), even the most 'conservative' members of the GOP just went along because what mattered most to them was not courage of conviction but careerism and opportunity. Why open their mouths and risk losing lucrative careers as politicians(who rely on Jewish money and media coverage) and lobbyists and lawyers(upon leaving office).
Even law firms, now mostly controlled by the Tribe, only serve clients and cases deemed safe and ‘reputable’ by the Jews. So, the side that opposed ‘gay marriage’ in defense of True Marriage before the Supreme Court couldn’t get any support from top law firms. And top Jewish-run law firms are using all their resources to sue Richard Spencer and shut him down while truly courageous dissidents can’t get any representation.


Even though the second kind of Treason is crass and lowdown, at least there’s an element of honesty. Craven careerists and weasely opportunists know they’re just in it for the money, for ‘what is mine’. They betray morality, values, and principles to move up the ladder or feed at the trough. Now, people like Paulie in THE GODFATHER aren’t betraying principles or values because they got none. Paulie betrayed the Corleones, his employers, but he didn’t betray his own values because he’s utterly devoid of any moral sense. At Connie’s wedding, the Chico-Marx-lookalike-jerk mutters to himself about how he would steal the money bag if it were anyone else’s. So, a total slimebag like that has no sense of morality to betray. The most he can do is betray other people.

In contrast, there are many people who do have a sense of values but betray them out of material self-interest, social approval, or cowardice. If they’re honest, they will admit, at least to themselves and maybe close ones, that they’ve betrayed moral values for material values. If less dishonest, they will rationalize their compromises with all sorts of twisted logic. If truly dishonest, they will pretend that their act of betrayal was actually done out of realization of higher morality. A good example is Charles Murray changing his mind on ‘gay marriage’. The craven bald-headed fool caved to Jews and Homos, but he desperately tried to convince himself that his change of heart was brought upon by becoming ‘more evolved’. Not much better is Ross Douthat, the chunkheaded pompous Catholic jerk, who got down on his knees and begged for ‘terms of surrender’. In other words, he’d be willing to bend over and take it up the ass but please oh please, don’t force Christian bakers to make ‘gay wedding’ cakes. Some courageous Christian. And since when do Jews and homos show any respect or consideration for craven cuck-cowards like chunkhead Douthat? Opportunists like Murray and Douthat can rationalize all they want, but deep down inside, I know and they know that they caved under pressure because they don’t have the true grit, the kind of character that informed Joachim Fest’s father who refused to go along with the Nazis. Murray and Douthat are ultimately little more than putty in the hands of Judeo-Nazis.

Finally, the third kind of Treason is the most problematic. Suppose we apply the three types of Treason to white people. Let’s consider the first kind of Treason, that of higher loyalty to Truth and Honor. Suppose there is a white nation that is committing a grave wrong to a non-white nation. Suppose a white person in the white nation betrays his own nation and sticks up for the non-white nation out of moral conviction. So, even though he wants to be loyal to his nation, the great wrong compels him to stick up for the other nation. When Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan opposed the Iraq War, they were accused of treason by many Conservatives. But their ‘treason’ made a moral argument against what they deemed to be illegal and unjustifiable US actions. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, and the US had no legitimate reason to bomb or invade Iraq.
Now, let’s consider the second kind of Treason, that of craven opportunism, among white people. The most obvious example of this is all those white politicians and cuck-elites saying or doing anything, even at great harm to their own race and nation, just to win favors from all-powerful Jews. Whether Democratic or Republican, most white politicians, members of the Deep State, or big business will betray their own race and nation if serving Jews will further their careers or fill their pockets. They’ve grown so cynical and/or shameless in a debased Jewish-run nation of amorality that they don’t believe in anything but their personal status and prestige. Patriotism is gone in a US that is no longer a white nation. Faith is gone in a nation that is no longer about God but about holy homos. And morality is gone in a nation where most kids grow up to rap, trash, tattoos, and piercings. In such a fallen world, what is the only thing worth salvaging? Gimme ‘what is mine’.

The first and second kinds of Treason are easy to understand. The first kind is about higher morality and conscience. The second kind is about base desires. Though the first and second kind are different, they have one thing in common: Agency. The man of higher morality thinks and reasons on his own and comes to his own conclusion of what must be done. The man of base desires may not be admirable of character but, at the very least, he freely chooses to act out of craven greed.
But what about the third kind? It is marked by lack of agency. The person who practices the third kind of Treason is convinced that he or she is acting out of higher morality but is really nothing but a tool. Consider all the pussy-hatted white feminists or SJW-types into self-righteous supremacist vanity. They believe they are betraying the white race for the noblest reasons. They associate whiteness with ‘racism’, ‘white privilege’, patriarchy’, ‘xenophobia’, and etc. As GOOD white people, they believe that their anti-white stance speaks volumes about their higher virtue. After all, they’ve transcended base tribalism of us-versus-them and have chosen to side with rest of humanity in the name of Social Justice, Diversity, and Inclusion. The people afflicted with the third kind of Treason really feel this way. But do they have agency?

Of course not. Take James Comey, a race-traitor who serves the Jewish-controlled Deep State that is hell-bent on destroying White America. Comey may believe himself to be a goody-good white man with a ‘higher loyalty’ who counters white ‘racism’ to make for a better America founded on the principles of MLK’s teachings. But did James Comey, a man with a teacher’s pet personality and company-man's lack-of-imagination, ever dare to think outside the Box of what he was told by the media and academia? Did he ever ask hard questions about the Power? Did he ever notice that the Power is full of hypocrisy? Was he ever self-aware of the fact that he violated FBI codes of conduct to favor certain outcomes in service of End-of-History that insists on hegemony of US as the ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ nation, presumably because the US is about Jew-worship, Magic-Negro-and-Mandingo-Worship, and Homomania? Has there ever been a man so tall in body but so tiny in understanding? Still, one could argue that Comey-ism doesn’t really qualify as the third kind of Treason. His treachery could be categorized with the second kind. He is essentially an opportunist and company man. He may have deluded himself that his betrayal of Trump and the white race is about ‘higher loyalty’, but he’s always been about climbing the ladder and serving his own career. He may see himself as a kind of proggy Howard Roark, but he is actually pure Peter Keating. Indeed, had he grown up in Nazi Germany or Commie East Germany, he would have been someone like Adolf Eichmann, a yes-man who just swallowed the official dogma and followed orders.
Keep in mind that Comey violated the rules of the FBI not out of personal conscience(as Snowden did) but in total obeisance to Deep State power. The order came down to protect Hillary Clinton, and he did just that. Also, his meteoric rise in the agency suggests he was spotted early on as the kind of toady who will dutifully serve The Power above all. The Power controlled him in body, mind, and soul. And Comey was fine with that because his pathological personality wants to be accepted, approved, and appointed.

In contrast, there are white race-traitors who truly and sincerely believe that their treachery is for the higher good. They believe their Treason is of the first kind, a greater loyalty to a higher justice. They see themselves as above the brutish tribal politics of ‘us versus them’. They see themselves as possessing sympathy and compassion that too many tribal white ‘racists’ lack. Even when they are told that their positions will lead to White Genocide, they stick to the anti-white program in the conviction that whites must atone and pay the price for their unforgivable historical crimes. They feel so noble of heart and soul that they are even willing to sacrifice their racial-communal well-being for world justice. Also, unlike the Comeys, Hillarys, Bidens, McCains, and Bushes of the world, these race-traitors of the third kind of Treason have little to gain by spouting the nonsense that they do. They usually gain nothing by posturing as deracinated do-gooders. So, at the very least, they are not primarily opportunists and company-men like Comey or other such sleazeballs.

But they are nevertheless delusional moral morons because they lack agency and understanding of The Power and how it works. Indeed, it is doubtful if these clowns had a single independent, autonomous, or original thought/observation in their entire lives. Everything they believe and say is just druggy incantation of PC catechisms planted in their minds by Jewish-run academia or media. And the idolatry that governs their imagination is the product of Hollywood and Jewish-run music industry. Indeed, the narrowly selective nature of their social justice sympathies shows how utterly controlled by Jews they are. Because the West is so thoroughly Jewish-controlled, the general rule is "The more your views align with the agenda and narrative of the Empire of Judea, the more you are a tool of The Power." Because most Jews are Zionist, anti-white, Homomaniacal, pro-Mass-Invasions(to all nations except Israel), and promote interracism(with black men) for white women & cuckery for white males, the chances are you are a total tool and puppet of Jews if you, as a white gentile, also support those policies to a tee. Granted, there is a chance that you, all on your own, arrived at the same conclusions, but there is a greater chance of winning a national lottery.

The more you diverge from official dogma and narrative, the more you’re independent of The Power controlled by Jews. This is why Jews are using all their power to attack the Alt Right more than any other force. Alt Right is the most liberated and emancipated in mind and body from The Power. Paradoxically however, the further right you veer from the Alt Right, the more you’re likely to be an Unwitting Tool of the Jews because it is in the interest of Jews to associate any white identity politics as ‘nazi’. Indeed, the 14/88 and Neo-Nazi elements are not what Jews fear most. If anything, Jews find such lunatics and losers very useful as ‘bad optics’ to smear White Identitarians with. It is then not very surprising that some of the key leaders of Neo-Nazism have actually been closet-Jews. In Canada, Jews encouraged Neo-Nazis and skinheads to make a scene in order to use the ‘scandal’ to fear-monger and push for Hate Speech Laws. (Of course, Zionist Judeo-Nazi vitriol against Palestinians and Muslims is not deemed as ‘hate speech’.) This is why ADL and SPLC fear Jared Taylor far more than David Duke. Whatever Duke says, right or wrong, the Jews can always smear him as the ‘former Grand Wizard of the KKK’. But no such smear can be done to Jared Taylor, which is why Taylor has been banned from Twitter but Duke hasn’t been. And in the end, it is Mike Enoch’s intelligent and rational discussion of the Jewish Question that trigger Jewish Supremacists. Jews don’t fear the side of Enoch that larps as ‘nazi’ because Jews could always use it to smear the Alt Right.

This is why Ramzpaul had a point in bemoaning Alt Right’s flirtation with parodi-nazis like Andrew Anglin.

Even the slightest association of the Alt Right with ‘nazi’ element will be used by Jews to smear the entire movement. In contrast, New York Times can run sympathetic articles about Marxism and Maoism because (1) Communism was once a weapon of Jews to smash Christian Churches and to kill millions of Slavs and (2) Communism has been regarded as the main enemy and destroyer of fascism(though, ironically, Israel adopted a fascist conception of the nation-state, and former communist nations like China and Russia are now governed along lines that resemble fascist theory of power and history).

Anyway, one look at something like the Pussy March, and you know that all these deracinated and insipid race traitors lack agency. I mean, what self-respecting person imitates countless other minions and idiots whose idea of ‘social justice’ is wearing a ‘pussy hat’ or walking around in pussy costumes? All their chants and slogans are tiresome cliches spoon-fed to them since cradle. The sheer lack of coherence and consistency in their world-view proves how feeble of mind and weak of conscience they are. Their hysteria is not the outpouring of deep passion but desperation of people who must throw tantrums to again attention for their 'virtue' toy-playing. "Look Ma, I'm so goody-good." It’s like a crybaby who wants love, attention, and huggy-wug. Their movement is about tantrums of the Current Year, not deep passion for what really matters.

These people have hive-minds. Their morality is purely symbolic than substantive. So, the ONLY reason they opposed the Iraq War was because they hated Bush. The only reason they were silent about Obama’s wars and greater destruction in the Middle East and Ukraine was because Obama had the ‘progressive’ symbolism of being a ‘historic’ black president. Granted, there are plenty of such morons on the American Right as well. They supported Edward Snowden only because he made Obama’s administration look bad. But if Snowden had spilled the beans on the Bush regime, then many of those Rightard dolts would have hated him and called him a ‘traitor’.
Symbolic justice/morality is really a form of injustice. Consider Bradley ‘Chelsea’ Manning who was pardoned by Obama ONLY BECAUSE he’s a tranny. Because of the symbolic value of LGBTQ in the current PC, Manning got a get-out-of-jail-free-card. If not for that symbolism, he would have rotted away in prison for a couple of decades. And because of the symbolic value of Jews(and Jewish clout in law and government), Jonathan Pollard got pardoned and rewarded by rich Jews with a plush job. This man was a total traitor, but Jews take care of their own. Indeed, while Pollard was in prison, Jew-run Media always ran Christ-like photo of him.

And in the case of Charlottesville, Deandre Harris the thug was set free because his blackness has symbolic value. In contrast, Jacob Scott Goodwin who counter-attacked him for having attacked a white guy is facing ten years in prison. This is how Symbolic Justice works in PC-ruled US, one where illegal alien leeches are symbolized into sacred 'dreamers'. If your identity has symbolic value, you get ‘affirmative justice' points. But if you’re a white guy and totally innocent, you are attacked and persecuted even though it is YOU who have been victimized. Richard Spencer, for instance, is being sued by Powerful Jewish Law firms because he symbolizes ‘white supremacy’.
Now, we know how Palestinians feel. One of the biggest mistakes that white race made was sympathizing with Zionists over Palestinians. Whites thought that if they supported Jewish nationalism and identity, Jews would reciprocate and support white people. Instead, Jews decided to do to whites on a grand scale what they’d done to the Palestinians. The West is now turning into a giant West Bank. White voices are being silenced. White people are fired and destroyed. They are denied justice and representation. They are dehumanized by the Judeo-Nazi media and entertainment.


The fact that so much of Western ‘justice’ is now based on symbolism than substance is proof that most White Race Traitors are more dogs than humans. They have no understanding of anything except on the surface of which-group-is-deemed-holy and which-group-is-deemed-wicked by the Powers-that-be. Indeed, most Progs are too lazy and stupid to do any searching for themselves and just rely on either Jew-run MSM, Organized Education, or Hollywood(!!) for their impression of how the world works and what is happening. When a truth-teller on black crime like Colin Flaherty gathered up all the evidence of bad black behavior, the Jews-who-run Youtube took him down.

As far as Jews are concerned, reality is too triggering and undermining of Jewish supremacist power. To prop up their tribal domination, Jews need to favor symbolism over substance. Because Jewish supremacism cannot operate without White gentile submissivism and because White Submissivism cannot exist unless White Identity & Pride are paralyzed with ‘white guilt’ and white cuckery(before the Negro), Jews push the symbolism of the Magic Negro and Mandingo. The Magic Negro myth promotes the symbolism of blacks as the perfect children of the christian god(of course, the Jewish God favors Jews), a people horribly wronged by wicked and satanic whites who must atone forever. And Mandingo myth — it is time to replace TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD in classrooms with MANDINGO the novel — says blacks are the true master race with more muscle and bigger dongs. So, there is the symbolism of blacks as noble victims deserving of white guilt & sympathy and as nature’s true aristocrats, the authentic race that must be worshiped by slow, dweeby, and flabby white boys who should surrender their women to the superior black men.

Now, if we sweep aside the bogus symbolism, a more sensible view would be, "Yes, it’s true that blacks were once enslaved or discriminated against in the US, and it is also true that blacks are more muscular and tougher than whites." So, what does that mean in the real world? It means blacks can kick white ass. It means black thugs are filled with arrogance and contempt for the ‘faggoty-ass white boy’. It means blacks don’t believe in equal dignity with the white race but feel that white wombs exist to be colonized by black seed and white boys' faces deserve to be smashed by black fists. It means black males see white males as ‘white boys’ who should suck up to blacks. In other words, it’s a clusterfuc* of complexity with no easy solutions.

But do NOT expect the SJW self-righteous-supremacist types to be aware of anything. They have no idea that their anti-white treason is a programming coded into their minds by Jewish Supremacist globalists, the real terrorists of the World (Dis)order. They just go for symbolism of black holiness... just like plenty of idiotic ‘conservatives’ on the so-called ‘American Right’ fixate on the symboism of Jews as a Holy Holocaust people who can never do any wrong... which is why Pat Buchanan has to school that idiot Sean Hannity on why Bibi Netanyahu is so full of shi*.

Anyway, the third kind of Treason is about the controlled minds of pets and dogs of PC. There is no agency, no real conscience, no true understanding of what is what or what is really happening in the world. It is about being addicted to the feeling of holier-than-thou, more ‘evolved’, more ‘righteous’, and pure-of-heart(which is hilarious when your average prog is a total degenerate). They are really more like crack addicts or sugar-junkies of delusional justice. They are Justice-Junkies whose idea of right-and-wrong has been totally implanted in their minds through electronica controlled by heinous Judeo-Nazis who continue to destroy Palestinian lives.
Granted, there are some people on the Left or Progressive side who are awaking to the bogusness of Russia Hysteria Conspiracy narrative, the corruption of Neo-Liberalism, and the urgency of Palestinian calls for justice. They also realize that Obama’s foreign policy was essentially a continuation of Neocon nuttery under Bush because, after all, there is no real difference between Zionist Neocons and Liberal Zionists who, in essence, play Good Cop and Bad Cop to fool the world.

A Response to "Heritage Foundation Defends Facebook’s ‘Right’ to Censor, Will Oppose Regulation" on Breitbart

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/05/03/heritage-foundation-defends-facebooks-right-to-censor-will-oppose-regulation/

Heritage Foundation is so full of BS.

Now, the argument that Facebook can do as it pleases because it is a private company has merit... if it were consistently applied.

BUT, would Heritage Foundation argue in such manner IF Facebook were owned by Palestinian-Americans and banned Pro-Zionist pages and voices as 'hateful' to Arabs? Really?

Or suppose Twitter is owned by Iranian-Americans who detest Israel and Zionists. Suppose they ban AIPAC, ADL, and other pro-Zionist groups as 'hate groups'. Would  Heritage Foundation support the right of Twitter to ban pro-Zionist voices?

Or suppose Youtube is owned by Chinese-Americans and they worked with pro-Chinese voices(even in China itself) to shut down critics of China as 'hateful'. And suppose pro-Tibetan voices are banned from Youtube also. Would Heritage foundation support that?

No, of course not.

Also, the so-called Liberals are total hypocrites. They've been saying forever that it was EVIL and ANTI-AMERICAN for the Red Scare and Anti-communists to have fired and blacklisted people suspected of being communists or communist-sympathizers because, after all, the Constitution protects people's civil liberties regardless of race, color, or creed.

CREED means ideology, belief, religion, or conviction.

But now, the Liberals are saying people should not be hired or they should be fired on the basis of creed alone. If their creed is 'hateful'(according to Judeo-Nazis and Homomaniacs who rule current America), they must be shut down. Examples of obvious truths censored by Twitter that takes from Judeo-Nazi organization ADL that supports Zionist tyranny over Palestinians:

And,Heritage Foundation, a cucky-wuck organization, says Facebook and other companies(owned by people of certain ethnic group) can ban people who advocate for white interests.

With a 'right' like that, who needs the left?

Worst of all is the sheer hypocrisy. The goal posts keep changing to favor one side. So, we are told that blacklisting communists and leftist radicals during the 'McCarthy Era' was so terrible because of 'Muh Constitution'. We've heard that narrative a million times from textbooks and PBS documentaries.

But when it comes to pro-white voices calling for white national liberation from PC tyranny and Jewish Supremacism, they must be fired, blacklisted, and shut down. And the Liberal Media are fully behind the silencing. But then, most of the media, like most internet platforms, are owned and controlled by Jews who are only 2% of the US population. (And Heritage Foundation relies on rich Jews and cuck-oligarchs for donations.)

But then, the very people who've denounced America of the 40s and 50s for anti-communist and anti-Soviet hysteria are now pushing the totally nonsensical paranoid hysteria about 'Russia Hacking'. These psychos are shameless. At the very least, the Soviet Union after WWII was a real empire with a radical ideology. In contrast, Russia today just wants peace and trade. So, why is anti-Russia hysteria worse than ever? Because Jews rule America and hate Russia because Russia won't play nice doggy to EOJ or Empire of Judea. It won't bend over to Homomania(a form of Satanic-Jewish-christianity) and won't let Jewish oligarchs totally own the place.

In truth, Jew-run Hollywood was always about blacklisting. Suppose any writer or director proposes an idea for a movie about the Nakba Pogroms of 1948 from the Palestinian POV. Or a movie about Charlottesville that shows what REALLY happened, i.e. Jewish mayor, black police chief, Deep State, and Big Media all conspired to shut down the event and railroad White National Liberationists who said NO to Jewish Supremacism.

I guarantee that person will never work in Hollywood again. The anti-communist era blacklisted lasted just several years. But anti-white and anti-Palestinian blacklisting in Hollywood go on forever.

A Response to David Brooks' "The Future of the American Left"

http://www.unz.com/isteve/brooks-the-future-of-the-american-left/

"Not long ago, most of the American left tended to think transnationally — partly because problems like climate change are global, partly because it’s hard to regulate a global economy nation by nation, partly because progressives used to be psychologically averse to nationalism."

Funny, but it seems ‘free trade’ is transnational too, and it allowed rapid industrialization of China and India that led to so much additional green house gases. Maybe the global environment wouldn’t have been so polluted if not for transnational global capitalism.

Sierra Club used to be more mindful of immigration’s impact on environment. No longer. It got bribed into welcoming more mass invaders into the West.

Also, as Ross Perot pointed out, when US companies remained IN the US, they adhered to environmental regulations. When they moved to Mexico, Vietnam, or China, not so much if at all. They could pollute all they wanted.

"Tribalism is in the air, on the left as well as on the right."

As opposed to both parties saying WE LOVE ISRAEL AND WE HATE RUSSIA & IRAN BECAUSE JEWS HATE THEM?

Tribalism or nationalism is NOT a zero-sum game of ‘we get all, you get none’.
Maybe it is with Jews, and therefore, Brooks could be projecting his tribal supremacism onto others. After all, the Jewish way in the Middle East is ‘Jews get everything, Palestinians get nothing’. Or it’s a case of  ‘Israel can have nukes and randomly attack its neighbors and be showered with billions in aid… but Iran, a nation with no nukes, must be sanctioned to death.’
Brooks’ tribe practices that kind of zero-sum tribalism.

But most peoples in the US don’t. Their tribalism is ‘negotiative’. And most of American tribalism was always like this. Take NY. It has had Italians, Jews, Irish, Poles, blacks, Germans, Greeks, and etc. They all had a sense of ethnic community, but they knew they had to get along with other groups. So, they negotiated. It was never about ‘We Italians get everything, and rest of yous get nothing’ or ‘We Irish take everything, and the rest of you starve.’

If any group tarnished the good name of negotiative tribalism, it was Jews because their agenda was ALL OF YOU MUST SERVE US. Jewish tribalism has been the most zero-sum.

For example, Greek Americans have Greek interests and use their political and economic clout to sway US government to favor Greek interests. Turkish-Americans do the same. All groups do this. But Greeks don’t make ALL OF US favor Greek interests over our own interests. Greeks do their thing, Irish do their thing, Turkish-Americans do their thing, and etc.
But Jews? All of us are made to sing must hosannas to Israel, all of us must worship Shoah(even though most of us had NOTHING to do with it), and all of us must despise and hate Palestinians. And if Jews decide to hate Russia and Iran, all of us must hate them too. What is MSM but Jewish-run Hate News against Russia, Iran, and White gentiles?

Someone should tell Brooks that his people need to practice negotiative tribalism than zero-sum tribalism. Even so-called Jewish Liberalism is just a weapon of Jewish Power. Jewish anti-tribalism is really just (((anti-tribalism))) that aims to boost Jewish tribalism be weakening gentile tribalism. Jonathan (((Weisman))) let the cat out of the bag when he explained that Open Borders policy is wonderful because it is especially good for Jewish global hegemony. Basically, he’s admitting that gentile national sovereignty must be tossed to serve Jewish globalist hegemony.

Another thing. Identity politics of Right and Left are utterly different. On the Right, it’s about loyalty to essential and real identity with history, roots, culture, and memory.
In contrast, leftist politics is about ideology than identity. Credo than Ethno. Marxism is an idea in the mind. Now, classes do exist in society, but they are far less fixed than race, ethnicity, or culture. Whether rich Greek or poor Greek, a Greek is Greek. But if a poor man becomes a rich man, his class has changed. In India, caste and ethnicity are almost synonymous but not in the West.

Still, at least Marxism addressed real social evils of the dark side of capitalism. Today’s ‘leftism’ is an inspid vanity circus about how homos and trannies must be celebrated, even worshiped(as proxy puppets of the Tribe). Some guy recently wrote in NYT that Marx was right, i.e. today’s SJW are still carrying the torch. No, if Marx turned out to be right, it is because capitalism did come to be dominated by disgusting oligarchic imperialists with no sense of limits or decency. Gayday is elite destruction of the true leftism of Mayday. Today's 'leftism' is like the Apple Campaign of 'Think Different'. It is corporate appropriation of everything to turn them into brands and logos. Today's 'Marx' is like a Che Guevara T-shirt. It is fake leftism invoked to push Homomania funded by Wall Street, Las Vegas, and Hollywood as a means to replace class politics with the cult of universal vanity and narcissism.

Also, much of leftist identity is really rightist. Black power, brown power, and etc are really forms of rightism.
They are about 'my people, my culture, my heritage'. They are particularist, not universalist.
They only happen to be allied with naive white gentile leftism. Likewise, Muslims in Europe are allied with secular leftists because the latter are more for Open Borders. Does that make Islam a ‘leftist’ ideology? No. It’s just about alliances… like Saudis are allied with the US.  And let's not forget the 'intersectionality' of Nazi imperialism and Japanese imperialism against the intersectionality of Anglo-American Imperialism and Soviet Imperialism. Politics makes for odd bedfellows.

Furthermore, current Leftism values identity only in terms of its ‘victim’ value. Unless an identity can invoke iconic victimhood, it has no value in the eyes of the Left.

In contrast, identity has value simply for its roots, substance, and history on the Right. Whether Swedes or Poles are a ‘victim’ group or not, the Right believes their identity has value as a repository of history, culture, and sense of larger shared community.

Leftist identity is purely negativist. So, if a group can claim victimhood, its identity matters. But if the group loses its victim credentials, its identity must be deconstructed and impugned.  Today's so-called Leftism is held together by Shared Hate. Jews maintain the Coalition by vilifying White Gentile 'cis-gender' Males as the source of All Evil.  Without that Hate Hysteria, the current 'leftist' coalition will unravel overnight.

In contrast, rightist conception of identity has value regardless of political fashions or perceptions. Thus, is far richer and more meaningful. It’s not identity as mere virtue-signaling.

Also, rightist identity is largely a matter of Inheritance.  You receive your identity, culture, and history from forebears and pass them down. In contrast, much of New Identity Politics on the 'left' is fantastic and faddish, especially with 'gender fluidity' that says a man with penis and balls is suddenly a 'woman' if he so chooses.

--------------------

Left needs to cross with the Right. And that is what Trumpism called for.

Left vs Right is the most toxic idea to come out of the French Revolution.

The proper way is Left and Right. That is the only intersectionality or convergence that really matters. Left without the Right is like a Crucifix with bar but no pole. Right without the Left is like a Crucifix with pole but no bar.

The radicals of the French Revolution failed because they were all leftist. Napoleon did much better by crossing left and right. FDR did this too with New Deal. The saner part of Hitler did the same before he went nuts with imperialist war fever.

Nationalism is the best socialism. When the elites are compelled to think nationally, they feel a sense of obligation to the people of the nation. If they think globally, they just dream of ‘new ____’(in the form of endless Mass Invaders) or spout off symbolic banalities about “it takes a village” without doing anything for anyone. After all, a man who takes care of his own kids is a better man than a man who claims to love ALL kids but does nothing for any of them, including his own.

An Hypothetical: Should Nick ‘the Knife’ Fuentes Castrate James ‘the Meat’ Allsup?

One of the advantages of the Dissident Right is the youth factor. Lots of energy and excitement. The downside, however, is young people, especially the males, tend to be rash, impulsive, and immature. This explains why so much of the Dissident Right and Alt Right movement got sidetracked by egotistical pissing contests. Some of this is downright pathetic, as with the Ralph Retort and Baked Alaska calling each other as ‘fatfuc*’. Young people should go easy on drugs and alcohol(and do something other than play video games for recreation/culture). Though more serious and thoughtful than Ralph and Baked, Nick Fuentes and James Allsup also had a spat over what seems like childish "that’s MY toy" issues. The problem with young people is they have a very limited frame of reference. When a thirty year old looks back on his past ten yrs, it is everything that happened between the age of 20 and 30, a period of adulthood. But when a twenty year old does likewise, the main reference is from childhood to growing years. Even though a twenty year old is fully developed mentally(and even intellectually), his lack of years as an adult means he is still an emotional child in most respects. Then, it is not surprising that the ‘debate’ between Fuentes and Allsup turned into a playground scuffle. Emotional children, they traded barbs as if still in grammar school. As fireworks, it’s not exactly Gore Vidal vs Bill Buckley(or Norman Mailer). It’s more like the bad blood between pals in KINGS OF SUMMER.




Granted, even many adults remain as perpetual children(or teenagers) because our world — Pop Culture is the main culture for most people, even the educated — is youth-centric, made all the worse by the fact that the three main cultural products consist of Rap music, super-hero blockbuster movies, and video-games.
Even Richard Spencer, a far more serious person than Fuentes and Allsup combined, is a tad too obsessed with BATMAN and 007 movies. But then, even serious publications and media devote inordinate time and space on Pop Culture and shallow fads & fashions. We live in a world of constant distractions and ephemera. Most people don’t have a core theme that serves as a continuous thread from which further meanings are woven. They do not tend and keep a flame that defines them throughout their lives. Rather, everything is switched on and off like electric lights. It is no wonder that the so-called ‘progressives’ wage a full Culture War on the idea of Essentialism. For them, the only ‘truth’ is the one that we make up according to whims of fashion, like the notion of there being over 50 genders. It is then not surprising that the current ‘culture war’ consists of wondering what color one should dye one’s hair, what piece of steel should pierce one’s nose, and/or how many tattoos should defile one's body.

Alt Right and Dissident Right run counter to the prevailing cultural currents released by Jewish Supremacists who control most of media and platforms. Of course, many on the Right suffer the same problems as those on the proggy side. Virtually everyone has been saturated with excesses of Pop Culture and Hedonism. The key difference is that elements of the Alt Right and Dissident Right at least realize that something is missing from their lives & society/culture and that something must be done to restore the rudder or the tiller. Richard Spencer’s idea that white people need to ‘become who you are’ implies that everyone has lost something precious and essential. Worse, most people don’t even know it’s missing and do not miss it for that reason. And yet, all the social and moral decay that plagues the white community(and other communities as well) suggest that, on some subconscious level, they do sense that something that should be there isn’t there. They can’t articulate what it is, but there is a budding desire to regain the ‘grail’ once again.
And even though Proglodytes and ‘Antifa’ are enemies of patriots, their desperate fanaticism or addiction to fads suggests that their sick souls are also aching and hankering for something of meaning. As Antifa has nothing with which to define itself in specific terms, it can only define itself AGAINST something. As slaves of Jewish-controlled Pop Culture and Political Correctness, their meaning comes from fighting ‘nazis’. But their dementia deafens them to the deeper murmur that longs to be heard. This murmur is something that some on the Alt Right and Dissident Right hear. It is like the tapping sound made by miners trapped deep below. Those who hear this tapping want to bore through the earth to bring air and light to those trapped in the dark cavern.
In contrast, the Neo-Nazi and 14/88 types, like the Antifa zealots, cannot hear the tapping either because they’ve opted for the simple truths of Heil Hitler in their moral poverty, inflated pride, and lack of imagination.
In a way, Antifa and Neo-Nazis deserve one another. The tragedy is that the Alt Right and Dissident Right have been associated with Neo-Nazis(and not entirely unfairly). But then, certain members of the Alt Right aren’t blameless because, instead of soberly tending the flame and illuminating the world with the lost truth, they squandered so much of the energy on hype and hubris. And they overestimated their own strengths and underestimated the full arsenal of the enemy, the EOJ or Empire of Judea.

Anyway, there you go. While youthful energy is a huge advantage in any movement, the young tend to be naive, impulsive, inexperienced, short-sighted, and driven more by hormones than neurons. This has always been the case. Consider how many Counterculture movements flamed out in the 1960s. So did the Hell’s Angels that degenerated into white gangsterism and the Black Panthers that degenerated into black thuggery. It is the rare young person who has the self-control, foresight, discipline, and cold calculation of a Michael Corleone. But then, Michael got sound genes and advice from his father Vito. (Okay, THE GODFATHER is just a movie.) In EXCALIBUR, the fellowship is made possible only because there is Merlin, a sorcerer with timeless wisdom, to guide Arthur who is capable of realizing and repenting for his wrongdoings. In reality, there are no sorcerers and magic, but each of us can cultivate an otherworldly voice in our head that serves as compass and gyroscope as we navigate through treacherous waters and minefields. Just as faith in God imbues some people to ‘hear’ and feel the steadying voice and hand of God, a development of an inner voice can have a Merlinesque effect on one’s thoughts, emotions, and actions. Greeks understood this. By imagining wise gods such as Athena and Apollo, they could start a conversation in their heads along the lines of "what would Athena advise?" or "what would Apollo do?"
Cultivating such a ‘spiritual consiglieri’ might provide a sense of balance to young people in the Alt Right and Dissident Right who are full of spark but minus the sense to use it intelligently and meaningfully. Richard Spencer, being older and having been around more than your average Alt Right activist, is more serious and less rash, but he too got blind-sided and overlooked his very insights. He’d spoken extensively about how the Power controls the laws than vice versa, but he naively trusted that the Constitution would see him through at Charlottesville. But, everything that happened there and thereafter was a perfect illustration of what Carl Schmitt had expounded. Power controls and manipulates the laws to get what it wants. The Jewish Power’s contortions of the Law to get what it wants have been on full display. Of course, Jews also control finance with which to threaten and destroy anyone who dares to defend the rights of the Alt Right. And Jews also control the media and push only their side of the Narrative. What we call the Free Press are really a form of Owned Media by Jewish globalist oligarchs.

But then, these setbacks need not be a total loss. By diagnosing and documenting how the disease of Jewish Power really works, the Alt Right can use the current crisis as a Teachable Moment for all the World to see, i.e. the US is not a Constitutional Democracy but essentially a Tribal Oligarchy ruled by Judeo-Nazis who play all sorts of funny-clever games with the laws to get what they want.

In the end, there is no end. That is the essential fact of history. Even when something is over, it is never over. It is fought over and over through the battle of narratives. Jesus and His Disciples suffered a tremendous setback with the Trial and Crucifixion. Jesus lost big, and His Disciples scattered like chicken. It seemed as if the whole thing was over and done with. But that was only the beginning of the war. The Disciples never forgot Jesus and kept on preaching their version of the Narrative. They told it over and over to anyone that would listen. And they even twisted things to make it seem as though Jesus had been resurrected and triumphed over death.
So, even though specific historical events happen and end, the War of Historical Memory can go on forever. A people who lost a war in fact can win it in storytelling. Black slavery was a story of failure and defeat, but the Narrative especially since the 1950s has made blacks the great victor over whites who are now enslaved with chains of ‘white guilt’. Of course, Jews played a big role in this.
And even though Jews won decisively over Palestinians, the War of Memory continues, and if anything, the Palestinians have been gaining in international sympathy, especially as Israel has become synonymous with nasty Netanyahu the jerk whose keeps crying wolf about Iran.

Anyway, that is not what this particular post is about. It is about whether Nick ‘the Knife’ Fuentes should castrate James 'the Meat' Allsup. Of course, we don’t mean Nick or anyone should tie down James Allsup(who seems to be a nice feller) like a hog and cut open his scrotum and pull out his testicles. We don’t mean anything like this: https://youtu.be/lUbEJW8atCc?t=2m19s So, there is no need for Allsup to worry. Neither Fuentes or any of his fans is going to stalk him to cut off his balls.
We mean Nick-as-metaphor(NAM) and James-as-metaphor(JAM). What is NAM? Nick Fuentes believes not only in traditional values but codes of conduct. So, it’s not enough to spout conservative or traditional talking points. One must LIVE the traditional moral life with its restrictions and responsibilities. It is for this reason that Fuentes isn’t primarily an Alt Rightist. The core of Alt Rightism is identity, and therefore, beliefs, values, and codes of conduct are of secondary importance. Not that ethos don’t matter to Alt Rightists, but ethnos comes first. So, Alt Right isn’t primarily concerned with whether someone is religious, atheist, pro- American or anti-American, traditional, futurist, or whatever. What matters most is that he has an unshakable sense of who he is and what ‘tribe’ he belongs to. So, Alt Right comprises everyone from an Odinist to a Christian to an atheist to a ‘White Shinto-ist’.
Also, because the main fixation is identity, the Alt Right as a big-tent movement hasn’t much to say about personal lifestyles or social conduct. The advantage of this is freedom, edginess, and spirit of experimentation. As aspect of Alt Right is genuinely bohemian and not necessarily at the margins. But there is a downside to such libertine-ism, and we see it among too many Alt Right people who tend to over-indulge in alcohol, drugs, and reckless behavior. Also, the emphasis on identity can drive some people to radical margins, as with fat Matt Heimbach who just became a Malt Right beer bellied neo-Nazi clown.

Nick Fuentes takes exception with the Alt Right on this matter. Though identity is important to him, it is not necessarily at the center of how he defines himself. As a Catholic, he believes God is the center of everything. He believes Jesus is the Savior, and that Western Civilization has been immeasurably enriched and empowered by the glory of faith. He also adheres to a code of conduct whereby men must try to act like gentlemen and women must try to act like ladies. So, it’s not enough to talk the talk. One must walk the walk. And this is where NAM, or Nick-as-Metaphor, comes in conflict with JAM, or James-as-Metaphor.
Not that James Allsup is a proponent of mindless hedonism and Animal-House anarcho-revelry. But his political vision is closer to the Alt Right in that European Identity is first-and-foremost and everything else is up for grabs. For example, one gets the impression that while James Allsup broadly subscribes to traditional morality, he believes there should be considerable leeway when it comes to partying and having fun. In a way, Fuentes and Allsup are like Pat Buchanan split into two halves. In the book RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING, there is Buchanan the devout Catholic and sincere traditionalist-moralist. But there is also the Buchanan the reveler, brawler, and party animal.

It’s as if the intellectual, moral, and traditional side of Buchanan ended up in Fuentes while his more strident and rambunctious side ended up in Allsup. Ironically, Fuentes is rowdier and more assertive than Allsup whose style, at least as radio-personality, is even-tempered and relaxed. In social activity and sexual behavior, Allsup is more the ‘chad’, but in the art of polemics Nick Fuentes refuses to be anyone’s Sancho Panza. He has to be top dog like Snoopy in "What a Nightmare, Charlie Brown".


Anyway, could there be a moral argument as to why NAM should castrate JAM. (Again, this is a game of Moral Hypothesis, not a call to chisel anyone's pair of marbles.) From the point of Nick-as-Metaphor, James-as-Metaphor is a transgressor, violator, and ‘desecrator’ of sexual morality and family virtue. Why? Because as a ‘chad’, JAM is soiling the future wives of other men. After all, whenever a man is humping a woman he doesn’t intend to marry, he is sexually conquering and ‘exploiting’ a woman who could end up with some other guy. So, he will have soiled and messed her up for the other guy.
Imagine there are 10 plates of food at a cafeteria. Suppose some guy enters and looks around. The proper thing is for him to choosen and take one plate of food to his table. That way, he has his own dish, and the other plates of food can be taken by nine other men. Now, NAM would understand this principle. In contrast, JAM may look around and put his fingers on every plate to taste samples. Finally, he takes one plate of food to a table. But the fact is other plates of food will all have been touched by him. So, the other guys end up taking plates of food that had been touched by JAM.
If JAM had just touched the food on one plate, the foods on other plates would be fresh and clean. But, if JAM had sampled the foods on each of the plates, then other guys must have second-hand food. They can only have food that had already been touched by someone else. It’d be like using a toothbrush used by another person. Who wants to eat something that’s been touched by others in a restaurant?
But in today’s culture, it’s deemed okay for a man to marry some woman who’s already been had by lots of other men like a prostitute. So, the chances are, a man is likely to kiss the lips of someone that have been wrapped around who-knows-how-many-penises? And with the majority of white women having had sex with Negroes, the chances are a white guy will have to marry someone who’d been Afro-junglized. In the past, a man could look at his wife and believe she really belonged to him and him alone. But now, when a man looks at his wife, he is looking at someone who’d been passed around among a bunch of JAM(and maybe Negroes too).

Imagine a community of ten men and ten women. Among the men, there are NAM, JAM, and eight other guys. Ideally, each man will end up with a woman. If men have a sense of male courtesy, each will choose one woman and stick with her. That would be NAM’s way. But JAM’s way is super-horny. He figures, "Why should I stick to one woman when I can hump all of them by flexing my ‘downie hapa’ muscles and making them go into heat?"
Now, suppose JAM is humping all the women, and suppose other guys are giving him high-fives for his sexual exploits. They see JAM as a kind of stud-hero(like pathetic white boys worship black athletes who hump thousands and thousands of white women). But suppose NAM reprimands them for praising and flattering JAM. NAM explains to them that JAM is fuc*ing their future wives. After all, each of the guys is going to want to settle down eventually. And that means each guy will have to choose a girl. BUT, if JAM had already humped all ten women, the guys can’t have fresh a fresh woman to deflower and own as one's own. What they’ll get are leftovers of JAM’s leaky sperm-fest. Then, JAM could look around the room at the wives of other guys, snicker, and say, "Yeah, I humped all of them." Upon hearing this bit of logic from NAM, suppose the other guys come to realize how foolish it had been for them to high-five and flatter JAM when the horny bastard was actually humping and staining their future wives.
And it is then that the other guys decide to play funny physics and reverse time to the moment before JAM humped the womenfolk. So, what must be done before JAM gets out of control and humps & stains all the twots(that woman over there) into ‘thots’? It is then that NAM figures the solution is to castrate JAM into a eunuch so he won’t be able to mess it up for the other guys. JAM is to get the BEGUILED or HARD CANDY treatment and end up like one of the slaves in HISTORY OF THE WORLD PART 1. Otherwise, he might get out of order like the French king and grab-ass all the womenfolk. Of course, this is all just a thought experiment, but the dynamics of a microcosm with ten men and ten women applies to all the world. It’s something worth remembering when guys praise some guy for humping all the thots. One of those thots could be your wife, already used and soiled by someone else.