Contradictions in the ‘Progressive’ Theory on Essentialism

Lately, so-called ‘progressives’, who are really a bunch of Decadents, have waged a Culture War on Essentialism, by which a person is defined by his birth, sex, race, cultural background, religion, and/or nationality. According to Decadents, Essentialism is unjust in predetermining a person’s identity instead of allowing him or her to formulate, choose, and decide what he or she REALLY is.

This is obviously a vulgarization and degeneration of a philosophical debate between essentialism and existentialism. According to existentialism, a individual should accept his freedom, learn to think on his own, and arrive at his own meaning of life. It had more to do with credo than ethnos or any identity.
An existentialist’s primary concern is man's cultivation of ethics and ideology. Instead of just receiving and obeying what is foisted upon him by the established system, he should question everything, learn as much as he can, think about his place in the larger world, and gradually arrive at a set of values and course of action based on his free will.

Whatever one thinks of existentialism, it has been part and parcel of modernity. And men like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus didn’t so much invent as illustrate the modernist way of thinking and reacting in a rapidly shifting world where certainties could no longer be taken for granted. At the very least, this kind of existentialism was meant to be rigorous, and it encouraged, indeed compelled, people to be well-educated, well-read, well-conversed, and always questioning and seeking. After all, if people are to be free individuals is search of their own meanings and values, their moral reasoning has to grounded in erudition and sharpened by experience, the trials and errors of life.

But as higher education has grown more democratic and ‘inclusive’, Ph.D’s came to be handed out like flyers, and second-rate and third-rate academics now fill the minds of dimwit or neurotic students with all sorts of silly ideas appealing to the stupid who are incapable of thinking or soul-searching. Just like Modern Art degenerated into Pop Art, Modern Education degenerated into Pop Education. Thus, even philosophical concepts have been turned into pop fads for easy consumption by shallow dolts whose main cultural mode is ‘celebrity’.

So, what had been intended as an arduous journey of self-discovery and attainment of personal truth based on experience, learning, & logic has degenerated into a vehicle of fast & easy self-promotion as a darling freak. It’s been made especially easy by turning the focus away from philosophy to identity(as opposed to inheritance that is rooted and received than invented on a whim). Right or wrong, wise or foolish, every school of philosophy requires lots of reading, reasoning, and contemplation. One cannot declare oneself to be part of any school of thought just by making noise or hoisting a banner. One has to read essays and tomes on the idea and formulate one’s own interpretation of those ideas. One also has to be acquainted with alternative & opposing schools of thought and logically argue why he believes his chosen ideas are superior or more useful than other ones. Or, one must come up with a new school of thought by rejecting or radically reformulating previous ideas. Such an endeavor would require real devotion to scholarship, as well as tremendous discipline and diligence of mind. And of course, such thinkers still do exist.
But how can masses of shallow idiots(addicted to trashy pop culture) be persuaded to embark on such a challenging, though ultimately rewarding, path? Also, given that so many professors are idiot ideologues than true thinkers themselves, their main objective is to amass or at least FEEL the power. It’d be difficult for a professor to FEEL the power if he or she must devote so much of his/her energies toward turning students into real thinkers. For one thing, if students do learn to think freely, they might think differently from the professor. So, in order for the professor to OWN his/her students, they must be fed PC nonsense whose emotional appeal isn’t much different from the childish Little Red Book or Quotations of Chairman Mao. After all, Mao’s main obsession was power, and he had no use for real intellectuals and philosophers who might disagree with him, better him in debates, and even see him as stupid and crazy.
Whatever one thinks of Marxism, it was the product of much research and intellectual labor. Even though Marx was full of contempt and intolerance for those who disagreed with him, he did embark on a formidable intellectual journey to understand and explain how history really works and where it is headed. And he wanted others to understand and respect his elaborate and ‘deep’ ideas. In this sense, Marx was a true thinker who abhorred the idea of compromising his intellectual vigor with easy opportunism.

In contrast, second-rate thinkers like Mao(though a first-rate strategist in his path to power) couldn’t hold a candle next to real intellectuals and philosophers. He couldn’t even win debates against the cleverer colleagues in the Communist Party. So, his way of regaining absolute power in the 1960s was to appeal to the masses of young dolts who would be his Red Guards intoxicated with fortune cookie radicalism of the Little Red Book, a kind of Communism for Morons. If Marx was spectacularly wrong but intellectually profound, Maoism was just spectacularly and profoundly retarded. But the, stupidity is always far more appealing to the masses. It’s like people understand astrology better than astronomy. This is why 'progressivism' has degenerated into winning hearts-and-minds with new STAR WARS movies as SJW fantasies.

So, if ‘radical’ professors with chips on their shoulders(especially in second-rate colleges) want to FEEL the power and want to play at Little Mao, what better way than to dispense Pop Ideas to their none-too-bright or neurotic students? Appropriate certain ideas from philosophy & past ideologies and vulgarize & popularize them into bite-size cliches and slogans that especially pander to the students’ sense of celebrity.

Celebrity is about idols and icons than about ideas. Most celebrities are famous for their ‘star’ quality in sports, music, movies, humor, and etc. As it turns out, most people don’t have the talent to succeed in the ‘cool’ fields. Then, how can everyone earn their 15 minutes of fame/celebrity? By imitating the most vain and narcissistic group in the world, the so-called LGBTQ community filled a self-promoting self-worshipers. And so, the Culture War on Essentialism is now centered on the issue of gender.

Gender Wars say that LGBTQ people are holy, magical, noble, saintly, wonderful, and glamorous. The home team has to win the Superbowl or World Series to have a parade in its name. Musicians have to make hits to win awards. Actors must do good work in movies to win the Oscar. But, people just need to be homos or trannies to be showered with love and adulation every year in massive homomaniacal parades and festivals. Due to influence of the Jew-run media, the widely shared assumption is that LGBTQ = Celebrity & Glamour. Indeed, a bunch of homos or trannies need not accomplish anything in life. Homos are cool and holy simply because they are homo and do fecal penetration, a behavior that is now consecrated with ‘rainbow’ colors.
And Bruce Jenner only needed to put on wig and dress to be showered with praise as ‘woman of the year’. Just like just being Obama got him the Nobel Peace Prize, just the fact of being ‘gay’ or ‘trans’ makes a person a cut above the rest. To be homo in our world is like being born an aristocrat in the pre-modern world.

This is why so many young people gravitate to LGBTQ worship and gender wars. As they grew up in a celebrity-saturated culture, they also want to be or be associated with celebrities. But most people just don’t have the talent to be good in music, sports, acting, comedy, and etc. Also, most of them have no access to famous people.
So, what are they to do? Should they pretend to be ‘gay’, lesbian, or tranny? Some non-homos do gravitate in that direction because people are naturally emulative of what is considered prestigious or respectable. It’s like all those Chinese women got their feet bound because it was deemed the privileged and noble thing to do in pre-modern China. As most people are unoriginal, weak in individuality, and sheep-like, they are followers than leaders or rebels. Even their acts of ‘rebellion’ are usually just imitations of others who lead the way. Most hippies were just imitating the trend-setters of Counterculture.
So, it’s not surprising that non-homos and non-trannies are now eager to be homo-like or experiment with being tranny. Even so, most non-homos can’t play that game for long. Non-homo guys will not want to experience fecal penetration. And most non-tranny guys will not want to get their penises and testes removed.

Still, so many straight men and women want to be associated with the ‘gay’ community and themes because mainstream media and pop culture have conflated LGBTQ stuff with glamour and even spirituality. Besides, while it’s difficult for a normie to come face-to-face with a famous star, he or she has a good chance of rubbing shoulders with a genuine fruitkin.

Still, because it’s too much for straight people to become homo or lesbian, the Gender Wars has made available something like 50 genders to choose from. Now, most of these ‘genders’ are just variations of homo or straight, but words are funny things. Words can create the impression of ‘fluidity’ even in things that are essentially fixed. If the only categories were homosexual, trans-gender, and straight, then 97% people would realize they are straight, and that’s that. Thus, they would have less reason to dilly-dally with the LGBT community. But if there are 50 genders, maybe all those straight people are not really straight but one of the many alternative ‘genders’, like the many ways of 'walking' in DEAD POETS SOCIETY. (Conformism is a problem when people are forced to consent to something stupid, retarded, or evil, like forcing young one to conform to PC. But, normal people doing what comes naturally is not 'conformism' but 'confirmism' of what they really are and are prone to do. So, the scene in DEAD POETS SOCIETY is a stupid lesson on 'conformism'. There is nothing wrong with people walking normally and properly because it comes naturally to them. If anything, willful non-conformism by walking like idiots is the real stupidity. If a society were pressure women to conform to foot-binding, that would be bad. But if women walk normally in a natural way, they are merely confirming their true selves, and there's nothing wrong with that. PC and Pop Culture pathologize what is healthy and normal while applying pressure to conform to what is deviant, demented, and degenerate, like getting body piercings, tattoos, and green-colored hair as false emblems of freedom and 'empowerment'.)

Anway, by feeling so preciously ‘different’ by adopting one of the 50 genders, maybe even people who formerly thought of themselves as 'straight' have far more in common with homos, lesbians, and trannies than with lame and boring cis-gender types. Cis are the new sissies.
Such nonsensical logic is the gist of the Culture War on Essentialism. It rejects the notion that straight people are essentially straight. It says each straight person should seek out ‘his’ or ‘her’ own gender-identity among the 50 or maybe 500 genders. Or maybe an individual isn’t a ‘he’ or a ‘she’ but a ‘they’.

And this game is especially appealing to young idiots because there is nothing easier than gender politics. It’s all a game of genitals and pronouns. ‘Muh dick’, ‘muh pussy’, ‘muh dick is a pussy’, ‘muh pussy is a dick’, ‘muh dick is a dick and a pussy’, ‘muh pussy is a pussy and a dick’, ‘muh dick has been replaced by a pussy’, ‘muh pussy has been replaced by a dick’, and etc. It’s really on the level of Beavis and Butthead but in bogus intellectual packaging.

But then, this Culture War on Essentialism has huge contradictions. If indeed straight people are not essentially straight but must seek out their ‘true’ genders, why does the LGBTQ community argue that homos were born homo, lesbians were born lesbian, and trannies were born tranny and THERE’S NOTHING THEY OR WE CAN DO ABOUT IT. Sounds pretty essentialist on a biological and inborn level.

A key contradiction in the Cultural War on Essentialism stems from the positing of gender as both biological and anti-biological. Decadent ‘progressives’ prefer to use the term ‘gender’ than ‘sex’ because the latter denotes biologically determined differences that demarcate males and females. Now, both terms can have merit in this sense: While the biological sexes of male and female do exist in reality, sexual identity is very complicated because cultures define masculinity and femininity differently. So, in some cultures, it is manly to cry, whereas other cultures see crying as essentially a feminine trait. So, even if there are only two sexes and even if the notion of masculinity and femininity is generally sound, different cultures have their own ways of defining norms in the male domain and female domain. However, that is not how those in the Gender Studies Departments approach the matter. They tend to argue that the concept of sex must be discarded entirely and be replaced by gender theories that argue that all ‘sexual’ identities and norms are ‘social constructs’. (And yet, these same people argue that some boys are born homo and want to play with dolls because they are genetically predisposed to do so. So, while there is no female nature among girls that prefers to play with dolls than with guns, that nature suddenly exists when manifested in young homo boys who prefer dolls over toy guns.) But despite all the efforts of gender theorists, the fact is gender theory cannot be understood apart from the reality of sex. After all, if we were to imagine a sci-fi clone world where everyone is a copy of Hulk Hogan, could ‘gender theory’ even exist? How could there be femininity in a world where all the people are macho Hulk Hogans? And which members of this Hulk Hogan community would suddenly want to act ‘gay’ or girlish? No, gender theories are possible because biological sexual differences are real, and these differences go way beyond different genitals. Emotionally and cerebrally, men and women are different, and homos and trannies are different from straights due to biochemical factors related to hormones.

So, the entire field of Gender Theory that wages war on Essentialism is one big contradiction. On the one hand, it encourages young people to put aside ideology & credo as the core source of their identity and instead focus on their biology and genitals. Instead of "I think, therefore I am", go with "Muh dick, therefore I’m man" and "Muh pussy, therefore I’m woman." So, your core sense of self should be more about what’s between your legs than what’s in your brains. Biology over Ideology, or Biology is ideology. But then, as if Gender Theory realized its mistake of Essentialism(rooted in birth or biology), it argues that gender identity isn’t biological but ‘creative’ or ‘constructed’. It’s a strange kind of game where you tell some kid, "What’s inside your mind is secondary to what’s between your legs. If you got a ding dong, you are a male chauvinist pig and evil patriarch, and you can’t do anything about it(unless you’re a homo, in which case you’re excused)... but then, never mind, because having a ding dong doesn’t necessarily mean you’re a man because you might want to put on a wig and dress, in which case, you’re a ‘woman’ and suddenly have more pokemon points than real women..."

This is why tranny business is so essential to the anti-essentialists. After all, even homo men are still male, and homo women are still female. So, even homos uphold the essentialist template of the reality of sexual differences. Homos may have different orientations than straight men, but Gore Vidal was clearly a man, and Susan Sontag was clearly a woman. It is only with trannies and theories of 50 genders that the essential notions of sexuality are really subverted. So, if a man puts on a wig and dress, he is a ‘woman’ and even feminists better accept ‘her’ as such or else they are the essnentialist ‘bigots’. Ridiculous, eh?

There is also the Political War on Essentialism, and this has to do with mass colonization of the West by hordes-of-color. Again, this has nothing to do with ideas or philosophy. It’s all a game of labels and brands. In order for globalists to realize their radical agenda of turning all the world into one big mass of interchangeable consumerist units, all racial-cultural-national identities must be subverted, undermined, and eradicated. So, any essentialist definition of a culture and people must be denounced and discredited. So, there are no Real Hungarians, no Real Poles, no Real Russians, no Real Japanese, and etc. All national identities must be ‘Americanized’, especially as the meaning of American is no longer essentially European or Western. Even up to the 1980s, an American was quintessentially a person of European heritage due to history, culture, and demographics, but the massive rise of non-white numbers has effectively redefined ‘American’ as whoever wants to come to America. Thus, Future might-be-Americans are more ‘American’ than Americans with deep roots in America or racial ties with those with deep roots. After all, if the meaning of ‘American’ must be anti-essentialist and ‘inclusive’ of anyone, any notion of American identity based on history, culture, and roots must be rejected because it will imply that those with deeper roots in America are more American or have more claim to America than those just off the boat or those who have yet to get on the boat.

This is one reason why the globalists have lost all interest in American Indians. If people were to feel that American Indians have a special claim to America because of their deep roots, then it also follows that whites also have a special claim to America since they have deeper roots than most recently arrived non-white groups who have historically contributed little to America.
Also, if indeed the main narrative of America is "whites took land from Indians", then the main moral obligation of white people should be to make amends to the American Indians, and surely massive colonization by non-whites is NOT any way to help the Indians. The result will be Indians losing their lands not only to whites but hordes of non-whites who can’t even make the claim of having founded and developed America as a modern nation.

But what do globalists care about real justice? Real justice is about a people owing something to the people they’d wronged. On this basis, one could argue that white Americans do owe something to the Red Man(who lost their lands) and blacks(who were brought over to work as slaves). But what do whites owe to the whole world when white Americans didn’t do them any wrong? Only demented globalist logic argues that white Americans(and white Europeans too) exist only to make life better for non-whites and Jews all over the world.

But even the Political War on Essentialism has its contradictions. After all, if indeed no race-culture-nation has any essentialist claims, why do Jews insist that Jewishness and Jewish nationhood cannot be negotiated? We are to believe that Jewishness exists as a fact, identity, culture, and history, and of course, Israel has a RIGHT TO EXIST as a Jewish state.

Another contradiction is the cult of White Guilt. If there is no essentialist history, culture, race, or identity, why can’t whites wash themselves of the social construct of the ‘original sin’ of ‘white guilt’? And why must ALL white people atone for the ‘sins’ of other whites? Why must Poles and Hungarians pay the price for what the Germans did? After all, if the argument is German people must commit national suicide for their crimes in WWII, why does this apply to other Europeans who were victimized or bullied by Germans? And why are Russians being compared with Nazis by Jewish globalists when more Russians were killed by Nazi Germany than any other people? And why are all white people in America made to feel ‘guilty’ about slavery when most whites never owned slaves and many came to America after the Civil War? And why does ‘white privilege’ essential-istially apply to ALL whites, even to generations of poor white folks who worked in coal mines or factories? In contrast, even the richest Jew whose ancestors had it so good get to flaunt his ‘essentialist’ identity as a member of the Holocaust Tribe.

It’s obvious there are no principles or consistency in the Cultural and Political War on Essentialism. Like most things pushed by Jews, the goal posts are changed ever so often to suit the agendas of people like George Soros and the loathsome Pritzkers. If one thing is for sure, Jewish Power is essentially hideous and vile.

On the Banning of the Concept of WHITE NATIONAL LIBERATION, possibly the Most Feared and Dangerous Idea on the Internet

Apparently, no idea frightens the globalist elites more than White National Liberation. Indeed, do a Google Search for "White National Liberation" with quotes included. (Quotes ensure proper word order in search results.)

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22white+national+liberation%22&rlz=1C1AOHY_enUS768US768&oq=%22white+national+liberation%22&aqs=chrome.0.69i59.7408j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

You will notice that the search results show 1,800 entries. But on the bottom of the screen, only 2 pages are available. If you click page 2, you get:

In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 13 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.

But if you click ‘repeat the search for omitted results included’, you still only get two pages despite there being 1,800 search results. So, it is obviously a rigged game.

Google is censoring most search results for "white national liberation". Why would Google be so afraid of that term and concept? It doesn’t require rocket science to come up with the likely answer. The fact is Google is owned and run by Jews. It has massive operations in Israel and works closely with ADL, a Zionist and Jewish-supremacist organization. Google claims to be ‘progressive’ and ‘inclusive’, but if so, why doesn’t it work closely with BDS and Palestinian Rights Organizations to curtail and censor the imperialist and supremacist ideologies and activism of groups like ADL and AIPAC? After all, Palestinians are the underdog, the David to Jewish Power’s Goliath and Pharaoh. If indeed Google is all about the rebels and mavericks against tyrants and oppressors, why does it not only allow powerful Jewish supremacist organizations to reprogram algorithms and outright censor certain individuals, groups, and ideas from its platform? It should be obvious to any honest person that Google’s so-called ‘progressivism’ is just a front, a facade to enable its massive accumulation of money and monopoly control, especially in collusion with the Deep State, which is also largely controlled by Jewish Globalists.
Is it any wonder that, like super-rich and monopolistic Wall Street and Hollywood, Silicon Valley giants like Google have been especially partial to Homomania as the new faith for mankind? Why would a bunch of homosexuals and trans-gender people be the darlings of the 'revolution'? Because with pinky-dinks as the vanguard of the movement, the oligarchic capitalist class has NOTHING to fear. After all, the main mode of homosexuals and trannies is vanity and narcissism, and that means the queers are fixated on access to privilege and celebrity. Being natural aristocrat-wanna-be’s, they are more prone to serve the upper-classes. Also, because Jews are the ruling minority elite, they want to normalize among gentile masses the notion that it is natural and proper for minority elites to rule, and what better way to accomplish this than by normalizing homos & trannies as the natural aristocrats, even elevating them to holy angel status, as objects of worship. If the great majority of straights or real-sexuals can be (mis)led to adore and adulate a sexual minority of freaks and deviants, then it's all the easier to persuade gentiles into believing that it is natural, normal, and even divine for the 2%(the percentage of Jews in America) to rule America(which, by default, means to rule the world).
Also, by favoring so many blacks and people-of-color in its search results, Google gives the false impression that it’s a company of Diversity and Equality when, in fact, it’s a Jewish-dominated company where most of its managers and minions are whites and Asians.

Recent revelations have shown that Google is full of shit. Its motto used to be "Don’t be evil", and most people thought Google would play fair, uphold liberty, and not rig the system to favor certain agendas, especially those closely aligned with the interests of the Tribal Overlords of the company. Apparently, investing heavily in Israel, a nation that occupies West Bank and enforces Apartheid policies against Palestinians, is NOT EVIL according to Google. Apparently, colluding with Deep State operatives who’ve started a ridiculous New Cold War with Russia and used propaganda & terror to spread chaos & mayhem in Libya, Ukraine, and Syria is not evil according to Google. And rigging the search engine to favor one political candidate over another is also not evil by Google’s standards. Indeed, some Google big shots just couldn’t keep their mouths shut about how much power they got and what they can do to alter reality by altering the perceptions of reality. It’s gotten so bad that it isn’t much of an exaggeration to say that Google is the most dangerous and evil capitalist company in the world. Sure, it offers many great and invaluable services, but Google rigs the system inside and out to favor the interests of globalist oligarchs. Just ask the Palestinians. Like Twitter and Facebook, another Jewish oligarchic company, Google partners with ADL than with BDS, despite the fact that ADL is a Jewish Supremacist Organization that supports Israel’s Zionist-Imperialist policy of crushing the body and soul of Palestinians. If indeed these companies are for the little fish, shouldn’t they be inviting BDS to offer advice on which voices to be shut down? Of course, if given such an opportunity, BDS will point to all the abuses carried out by Zionist imperialists and Jewish supremacists. It should be obvious by now that the owners of Google and Facebook are first and foremost members of the Tribe. Their core self-perception is as Jews, indeed not only as Jews but Jews with the quasi-divine-right to rule the world. While it’s possible that they had some ideals in the beginning, their sudden rise made them addicted to power and domination. Also, when the truth threatens to undermine the Narrative that sustains and shields Jewish Supremacist Power, all principles are tossed to the winds, and there is a circling of the wagons to ensure the supremacy of Jewish power. If not always conscious, it’s instinctual among powerful Jews that they must ‘stick together’.

And this is why Google fears the concept of ‘white national liberation’. It threatens the Narrative that Jews have woven over the years. It says Jews are on the side of justice, equality, and freedom(especially for underdogs, marginalized, and ‘victim groups’). In contrast, there are supposedly these ‘white supremacists’, ‘racists’, and ‘anti-Semites’ who threaten to undermine and even destroy this Forward March to Progress. Entire generations of kids have been raised on this tripe, not least because, for some time, Jews have had near-monopoly control over the media. Also, controlling Wall Street, Las Vegas, Hollywood, Big Pharma, and high-tech, Jews have amassed fortunes with which to buy up all whore politicians. Also, as gentile Liberals are reflexively anti-right, anti-white, and pro-white-guilt(and because Jews have been associated with the Left for so long), they’ve been reluctant to honestly assess the true nature of Jewish power. After all, Jews have been sanctified as the People of the Holocaust, supposedly the greatest evil committed in history by Adolf Hitler, the most evil man in history, in the name of ‘antisemitism’, the most horrible ideology that ever existed, aka, the ‘longest hate’.
In the past, criticism of Jewish power usually came from the Right, but due to apotheosis of White Guilt as the main religion for whites(though Homomania is now giving it a run for the money), even the White Right has been mostly ‘cucked’ into eternal atonement mode. If anything, American Conservatism will go to hell and back to prove how it loves Jews more than the 'left' does.

With Jewish power of money, media, and taboos, few people have dared to voice their concerns about Jewish Power. Jews have either excommunicated them as ‘antisemitic’ renegades or rendered them invisible because, for the longest time, anyone even faintly critical of Jewish power has been marked for blacklisting in the institutions and industries of consequence. Jews have been so aggressive in targeting their critics that even the American Right got to expelling men like Joseph Sobran. Another trick used by Jews has been to sensationalize and greatly exaggerate the visibility of extreme groups. So, few gusts of animus from KKK or Neo-Nazi skinheads have been made to look like storm clouds looming over the horizon to send the Great Deluge to drown all of humanity. Indeed, it’s hardly surprising that the media have made such a big deal over Andrew Anglin while simultaneously trying to shut down his Daily Stormer site. Anglin is obviously a demented freak with class clown personality who will spout the most outrageous opinions to gain notoriety and attention. Even his fans don’t take him seriously and mainly enjoy the wacky humor in the way that some people love Howard Stern or Mad Magazine. But Jewish media would have us believe that the pathetic loser dork Andrew Anglin is some dangerous skinhead overlord who may become the next Hitler. Even more ridiculous are the KKK scares. At least Anglin is a real person with a real face. In contrast, the KKK threat has been hyped as a bogeyman around every corner and in every college campus. Generations of kids have been so inundated with KKK Scare by books and movies that they react like characters in horror movies. In their fetid feverish minds, the Evil of America isn't primarily found in warmongering Pentagon, avaricious Wall Street, sordid Las Vegas, degenerate Hollywood, crooked intelligence services, propagandistic media, and mendacious Ivy League BUT in some peckerwoods who supposedly wander around with sheets over their heads to scare Liberal college kids half to death. This Horror Movie trope of the KKK has spread so far and wide that ‘hate hoaxes’ featuring KKK-sightings or KKK-vandalism have become like a national pastime among the Proglodytes and People of Color. Of course, Jews, as the People of Dollar, egg this on because it is in their interests to misdirect people’s gaze from the real power owned by Jews.

Anyone with a honest set of eyes and with a modicum of integrity knows that the supreme power in America is with Jews. This power isn’t merely supreme but supremacist, i.e. Jews believe they must use any means, by hook or by crook, to ensure permanent domination over goyim in America and thereby the entire world. But Jewish Power is all the more dangerous because of the Jew Taboo that forbids honest noticing and criticism of it. According to ADL’s logic, even mild criticisms of Jews should be discouraged because they may lead to stronger criticisms that may lead to ‘antisemitism’, which may lead to pogroms and then another Shoah. This is obviously paranoid nonsense.
Granted, we can understand why a minority elite may be more allergic to criticism than a majority elite. Majority elites at least have the support of the masses of shared identity. In Israel, the Jewish elites are of the Jewish majority, and so, there is greater open discussion of Jewish power. Even if the current Jewish elites were to fall, they will be replaced by new Jewish elites since Israel is majority Israel. So, power will remain with the Jews no matter who's on top in Israel. In contrast, when a minority elite falls from grace in the eyes of the majority, their fall may be permanent, and their vaunted position could be taken by either a different minority elite or the resurgent majority elite.

But even if Jewish anxieties are understandable, the Jew Taboo carries the danger of paving the way for truly frightening anti-Jewish violence in the future. It’s like the delaying market corrections can lead to a far greater economic crash down the line. Consider what happened with the Dot.com and Housing Bubble craze. The tendency of power is to grow more corrupt. This is true in all places and for all peoples. So, unless there is a countervailing force to criticize, expose, and correct the abuses of power, the power grows more corrupt. And in order to hide its increasing corruption, it grows more repressive and mendacious in its public relations. Even more corruption is needed to hide the corruption, just like some nations or companies come to rely on more loans to pay off the interests on existing loans. This has a snowballing effect, growing bigger and bigger.

If Jews had allowed and accepted some measure of honest criticism in their rise to power, perhaps some of their worst abuses could have been avoided. And then, Jews wouldn’t have been so desperate to cover up the abuses with yet more abuses of power and wealth. It’s like Richard Nixon might have saved his presidency if he’d owned up to the scandal and cut his losses. But the coverup required another coverup to cover up the coverup and then another coverup to cover up the coverup and so on. It’s like the corruption in the movie MICHAEL CLAYTON got so out-of-control because the company opted for layers upon layers of deception to cover up what was all too obvious.

At this point, it may not be possible for Jewish Power to come clean and still hold onto power. The abuses have been so great that honest discussion of Jewish Power could lead to the collapse of Jewish power. Especially since the end of the Cold War, Jewish abuse of power has gone into overdrive and destroyed so many lives in so many fields. There was the unconscionable Rape of Russia in the 90s. There was the rigged market in the Dot.com and Housing Bubble that funneled tremendous profits to Jews in finance. And when the bubble collapsed, Jews used their boy Obama to get massive bailouts and got even richer. The very people who’d been most responsible for the economic crisis also profited most through a web of connections to media, deep state, and government. Jews also took over foreign policy and destroyed entire nations in the Middle East, resulting in deaths of 100,000s and displacement of millions of people. This led to the massive migration-invasion of Europe. Jews, who’d invoked War on Terror as rationale to invade and remake the Muslim World, ended up aiding terrorist elements, some directly linked with the very people who did 9/11, to destroy nations like Libya and Syria. Jewish power also turned Ukraine into a hell hole. Though most vocal(verging on hysteria)in warning of the Neo-Nazi threat, Jews recruited Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine to do their globalist-imperialist bidding.

At every turn, Jews have tried to morally justify their actions by using their media monopoly to demonize Putin as ‘new hitler’, Assad as ‘terrorist’ & ‘mass murderer’, Iran as ‘new Nazi Germany’, and of course Trump as ‘white supremacist’. Even when a Jewish guy like Bernie Madoff defrauded the entire world, the Jewish media spin was, "It’s antisemitic to notice the Jewishness of Madoff and ethnic patterns in financial fraud."

Jews are master projectors. They blame Putin and Assad for everything that they themselves initiated and did. They blame Palestinians of ‘hate’ and refusal to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist when, in fact, Israel’s creation was a denial of Palestine's right to exist. And even though Israeli planes and tanks have killed many more Palestinians than the other way around, the main Narrative has been all about how Jews are so beleaguered and vulnerable in that part of the world. Too much money and too many lives have been destroyed by Jews since the end of the Cold War. The record has been so dire and the present reality is so fraught with dangers that Jews are now afraid of honest discussion EVEN IF they wanted to move in that direction. It’s like Hitler’s transgressions might have been forgiven if he’d stopped earlier and made amends. But once he went ALL IN, even invading the Soviet Union, there was no way to negotiate any kind of peace. It was Moon or Bust. He could win everything or lose everything. He’d gone in too deep and violated trust too many times to come to the table and engage with others in good faith again. The Allies would only accept unconditional surrender.
Likewise, if honest discussion of Jewish power and recent history were allowed, the skeletons would just pour out of the closet. With foreign policy turned neo-imperialist, finance turned fraudulent, media turned utterly mendacious, and culture gone degenerate with pornification of mainstream culture(even for children), Jews are afraid, very afraid. And there are now even murmurs about how the opioid crisis is largely due to the Jewish Sackler family.

If the #MeToo scandal is observed as an experiment, the implications are grim for the Jews. Just like Mao’s Hundred Flowers Campaign began slowly but soon broke the dam when people realized they could criticize the Party freely, the #MeToo phenomenon soon overwhelmed the Jewish community when mostly gentile ‘shikes’ realized they could air their grievances freely against Jewish men of power. When they saw a big fish like Harvey Weinstein go down and when Time Magazine gave green light to the aggrieved women by making them the ‘Persons of the Year’, Jewish power found itself bewildered with an avalanche of accusations in every corner of media and entertainment. Anyway, the #MeToo stampede suggests that it could have been avoided IF the pathologies of Jewish horniness hadn't been allowed to fester. Also, Jewish females often put tribal loyalty over ethics and worked with Jewish male cretins to sweep the problem under the rug. But then, plenty of gentile women deserve blame too because they’d exploited sexuality to gain advantage in the workplace. So, both Jewish excesses and female careerist opportunism worked in tandem to corrupt corporate culture. Since Jews were shielded by the Jew Taboo and since female careerists were shielded by feminist rhetoric, both groups came to indulge in pathologies degrading to institutions and industries. But because Jews are far and away the most powerful group in America with connections and support networks from coast to coast and from nation to nation, their abuses were bound to have far more serious consequences.

In a way, history missed a golden opportunity to arrive at an understanding between Jews and white people(Europeans and European-Americans) after WWII. 20th century witnessed the evils of radical antisemitism by Nazi Germany, but it was also a time of Jewish horrors committed against humanity. Jews played an essential role in communism, as both theorists and executioners. If anything, the horrors of ‘commie’ excesses emboldened the radical right in Europe and convinced enough conservatives to throw in their lot with Fascists and even National Socialists. Indeed, up to the outbreak of WWII, the communists had committed the worst excesses of political tyranny in Europe. Nothing the Italian Fascists or German National Socialists did until 1939 came anywhere near the bloodbaths carried out by communists in the Soviet Union. And as Yuri Slezkine has detailed in THE JEWISH CENTURY, Jews played an essential role in the creation of the Soviet Union and held elite positions in carrying out some of the bloodiest purges and mass campaigns. So, why has this side of Jewish history not been addressed properly?

One reason was the pretense that the Soviet Revolution was essentially a Russian Revolution that didn’t have much to do with Jews. Some argued that Jewish communists were no longer Jewish since they were atheists. Some have noted the prominence of Jewish figures like Leon Trotsky in the early stages of the Revolution but argued that Stalin’s preeminence effectively ended Jewish power in the USSR. Some even argued that the Revolution might have been more humane had Trotsky outmaneuvered Stalin. (All evidence shows that Trotsky was just as repressive and ruthless as Stalin. Furthermore, his contempt for the Russian masses went far beyond Stalin's attitudes. Also, Trotsky not only fully endorsed, from exile, Stalin’s greatest crime — the forced collectivization of agriculture — but complained that Stalin didn’t go far enough.) Some argue that since the USSR weathered and ultimately defeated Nazi Germany, its sins were washed by the greatest deed done for humanity. So, whatever crimes Jewish communists might have committed, they(along with their communist comrades) more than redeemed their name by defeating evil Nazi Germany. Some have argued that because the Soviet Union turned ‘antisemitic’ since the creation of Israel, Jews should be regarded essentially as victims of Soviet Union(as the Evil Empire) than as its diabolical founders. And some have argued that, as terrible as communism turned out to be, its ethos was noble, certainly far nobler than that of National Socialism. So, if National Socialism was evil incarnate itself and premised on doing evil unto mankind, communism was a noble failure at trying to save the world. Of course, Jews could push all such favorable Narratives in the West because they had the power of media, and even non-Jewish media tended to be dominated by Liberals who felt sympathy toward Jews as champions of social justice or victims of Wasp discrimination.

While there is some degree of truth to any Narrative, there is no getting around the fact that Jews were among the Great Powers in the 20th century(though unacknowledged as such because Jewish power was dispersed across the globe than concentrated in one nation) and were involved in events and movements that led to great suffering. However one tries to spin communism, its excesses were comparable to Nazi horrors and other demented movements in the 20th century. One cannot absolve Jews of their ‘guilt’ in communism simply by claiming that they meant well or were misguided by impatience to reform humanity. Too many Jews were well-aware of the insane murderousness of the Soviet Union, and furthermore, they didn’t merely go along but often led and exulted in the sadism and violence. Jewish communists not only waged war on human lives but on culture and history. They destroyed countless churches and looted arts & treasures in every area they controlled. These horror stories surely pushed many Europeans to support the Far Right as a bulwark against the Far Left.
But the rise of National Socialism wasn’t just a reaction against the heavily Jewish Far Left. Too many Jewish capitalists in Germany and elsewhere played fast and loose with the financial system to rake in obscene profits at the expense of the middle class and working class who were reeling from the traumatic aftermath of WWI. Just as bad, Jews perverted culture and morality, encouraging all sorts of deviance and pathologies to degrade German society at every level. Even though most Jews were not involved in fraud, gangsterism, and radicalism, too many were, and they came to amass huge fortunes and/or influence throughout society.

When panic and poverty are compounded by corruption and degeneracy, people can either resign themselves to defeat(like the masses of Latin America) or come together around a would-be-savior-prophet for social, spiritual, and national renewal. Germans opted for the latter around Hitler who tragically turned out to be a madman even crazier than the radical or avaricious Jews.
Anyway, the fact is Jews played a major role in the rise of National Socialism. There are two ways people can create a problem. By directing involving themselves in its making or by creating conditions that make such a creation welcome to so many people. Obviously, Jews didn’t want a man like Hitler to come to power with an ideology like National Socialism. And most Jews did what they could to stop Hitler. But by spreading radicalism, degeneracy, and corruption all over society, Jews indirectly helped create National Socialism.
Some Jews surely felt that degeneracy, decadence, and leftist radicalism were weapons against the radical German Right, and if indeed they’d succeeded in thoroughly corrupting German Society, the Jewish Plan would have worked. Too many Germans would have been turned into degenerate trash to come together and join a movement for national renewal.
But in some ways, the problems of degeneracy, decadence, and leftist radicalism were the best kind of fodder for the German Radical Right because they amply demonstrated to so many Germans that the National Socialists were largely correct about the corrosive role of Jewish in national and international affairs. Jews who spread degeneracy and radicalism were only proving in practice the Nazi theory of Jewish toxicity. Indeed, Jews made the job easy for the Nazis as Germany spiraled out of control financially and culturally as a nation of gangster bankers and vile pornographers.

Perhaps if the Nazis hadn’t gone to such insane lengths in their war against Jews, there might have been more soul-searching on both sides in the aftermath of WWII. Maybe the Shoah traumtized the Jews so much that they could only see themselves as victims, even saintly ones at that. And it must be said that the fact that Nazis targeted ALL Jews instead of just the bad ones made all Jews feel that they must stick together in a hostile world.

But then, maybe the real problem is Jews love being a**holes. After all, it’s not only with Germans that Jews play the innocent lamb while dumping all the blame on the other side. Consider Jewish attitude toward Russians. Now, it’s true that there was a history of Russian repression of Jews and even outbursts of violence in pogroms. And this is why Alexander Solzhenitsyn addressed the Russian side of the problem. Russians must reflect on their history and admit their wrongs. But Solzhenitsyn hoped that Jews could do the same when it came to Russian history, especially because Jews played such a key role in monstrous communism. But all we get from most Jews is, "We ain’t done nothing wrong, we were totally innocent, we were the victims, and etc."
Indeed, we are now in the Third Jewish War against Russia. The first one was Bolshevism. Second one was the Rape of Russia in the 1990s. And now, it’s the New Cold War, which might as well be called the Jew Cold War. Jews put all the blame on Russians and even invent wild fantasies about Putin-as-Hitler to push their insane supremacist narrative. And in the US, Jews act as if their exclusion from Wasp golf clubs long ago constituted some great injustice that supposedly explains, even justifies, the bad behavior of leeches like Jordan Belfort and other creeps. "Bernie Madoff, why did you steal billions from the world?" "My grampy couldn’t play golf." I mean it takes a special kind of chutzpah to pull off such shit.

Anyway, the real reason Jews at Google and elsewhere suppress the concept of White National Liberation is because that’s what the Alt Right is about at its core. It’s not a supremacist ideology or movement to conquer non-white worlds. It’s not a hegemonic ideology to bring non-whites to the West to lord over them as a helot class. It’s not a class-supremacist ideology that say white elites should work with fellow elites of other nations to reduce all non-elite masses into interchangeable units of cattle.

It’s about white people waking up to realize that there’s more to oneself than consumerism, hedonism, and PC dogma. It’s about reconnecting oneself to one’s roots, heritage, and territory. And in order to do this, a people must break free from the chains of supremacist hegemony. In the West, Jews have hegemonic and supremacist power. They have denied white people in Europe, Canada, United States, and Australia a sense of autonomy, independence, and sovereignty. Jews have wormed into all the elite institutions and industries and reprogrammed the core code to fundamentally alter the meaning of the West. White people used to think that they had a territory, history, and culture to call their own. But Jews used their control of media and academia to indoctrinate white elite minds with the notion that whiteness is just a social construct, white lands don’t belong to whites(but to the world), white women should reject white men as inferior and welcome Afro-Colonization of White Wombs, white history should be retconned to make believe that the great figures of Western heritage were black or non-white, and white people should forever feel ‘guilty’ and atone for their ‘sins’ by making amends to serve other people(especially Jews and blacks). So, according to the Jewish globalist template, there is NOTHING that whites can call, claim, defend, or preserve as their own. Everything that is European, Western, or white must be ‘shared’ with the rest of the world but especially with Jews of course. After all, if white people were to adopt PC to the letter and tried to treat Jews and Palestinians the same way, Jews will flip out and call such equal treatment ‘antisemitic’. Jews demand that whites favor Zionists over Palestinians and ADL over BDS. So, Jews are not really motivated by sincere universal idealism. Jews want access to everything that whites have. Now, if Jews said that they, as Jews, want all that white stuff, it will seem greedy and self-serving. So, Jews mask their greed for white stuff with universal call for ‘inclusion’. But this is most advantageous to Jews since Jews are most adept at taking wealth from other people. Consider Russia in the 90s. In that freewheeling world, Russia was wide open for plunder. But which people looted most of Russia? The Jews because they were most adept and savvy at pulling the strings and rigging the system to fill their own pockets. Imagine a land of kangaroos where things are so good. Suppose rabbits want access to loot the place. Now, if rabbits called for openness just to fill their jowls, it would sound greedy and tribal. Therefore, suppose the rabbits call for universal inclusion of all animals to enter the land of kangaroos. So, will all kinds of animals end up grabbing the loot of kangaroo-land equally? No, since rabbits can run faster, they will grab all the good stuff before others can. If a land is open to rabbits, tortoises, sloths, wombats, gophers, and skunks to pillage, which bunch of animals will get to grab most? The rabbits of course because they can race over there before others. Universal involvement doesn’t lead to universally equal results. Even if all Americans are presented with the same opportunities, Jews will out-compete most in business, science, and law. And blacks will out-compete most in sports. The naturally superior — Ashkenazi Jews have higher IQ — will rise above universality to hierarchy.

It is because Jews want access to white stuff that they mask their greed and self-interest with bogus high-minded rhetoric of ‘inclusion’ and universality. Jews know that they can beat the competition in reaching the highest echelons of power and privilege in the West. And Jews want power and privilege to serve their own tribal interests. But lest Jewish-centrism come across as wanton and gluttonous, Jews pretend to be leading all the huddled masses of the world to partake of white land and wealth that Jews say whites don’t really deserve because of ‘white guilt’ — whites supposedly stole from other peoples — and because ‘exclusion’ is ‘racist’ and ‘supremacist’. According to Jewish Supremacists, whites merely wanting to live in white lands and guard their white culture is ‘exclusive’, which makes it ‘xenophobic’, which makes it ‘racist’, which makes it ‘antisemitic’. This is how Jews play the game. It’s all just one big con-game, the kind pulled by slick operators in David Mamet films.

Jews are the ones in supremacist mode. They are the ones who hold whites in bondage to Jewish-centrism, Israel Firstism, Jews Uber Alles, Jewish Nihilism, Jewish Above-the-Law-ism. They are the ones who make white soldiers fight and die in Wars for Israel. They are the ones who control all the media to brainwash whites into hating their own race, Russia, Iran, and whatever Jews don’t like at the moment. Jews have no sense of principles. They will denounce Trump supporters as ‘nazi’ even as they work with real Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine. They will say the US must engage in more Wars against Terror, only to make the US work with terrorists to undermine the governments of Syria, Iran, or any nation hated by Jews.

What Jews fear most in the present is not White Supremacism because such doesn’t exist in the US or EU. The few KKK or Neo-Nazi elements are scattered, dumb, and have no power of any kind. If indeed the Alt Right movement was made up of such morons, Jews would have nothing to fear as most people see white-supremacist ideology for what it is: Idiotic stuff you see on Jerry Springer. It’s bald-headed guys with low IQ and tattoos giving the nazi salute.

The core message of the Alt Right is White National Liberation. It is a struggle for emancipation from Jewish Supremacism that dominates globalism, the current world imperialism that is the most evil force in the world, possibly in all of human history because globalism is an all-out assault to sweep away all races and all cultures on every corner of the world with Israel as the lone ark to survive the flood.
But then, lords of Chaos like George Soros are so demented that they might even sacrifice Israel for the nihilistic delight of transforming the whole world into a ceaseless melting pot of change. If Soros could blow up the Moon and upset the geological balance of Earth, he would. Some people see Soros as a Holocaust Survivor and some see him as a Nazi Collaborator. Some say he had no choice but to hide his identity and collaborate with Nazis to save his own skin. Some say he felt no remorse about what he did. In a way, both sides are missing the bigger picture. The fact is Soros is a sorcerer as pathological and demented as Hitler. His deeds as a young man weren't merely acts of desperation or opportunism in relation to the terrible moment. They were manifestations of his true nature as a nihilist who is capable of anything, not so much to survive or even to thrive but to attain godlike power to turn the world upside down just for the thrill of it. In this sense, he even frightens some Jews. Most Jewish elites will do anything to make Jews richer and stronger. Soros seems to do that too, but then pushes even further even if it endangers Jews because he wants the power of a god. He is Harry Lime with a god complex.

Anyway, there is no idea Jews fear more than the notion of White National Liberation because it undermines the whole edifice of controls based on the concept of White Supremacism. Jews have fooled so many white people(and non-whites) into believing that any sign of white identity, white interests, white history, white culture, and white territoriality is ‘white supremacist’ or ‘nazi’. And because of Jewish monopoly of media and academia, counter-narratives and counter-arguments have not been allowed in mainstream channels or respectable discourse. It’s been Jews talking with other Jews to decide on the proper definition and destiny of whiteness. The only role for white people is to listen, learn, agree, and obey. Any sign of dissent is diagnosed as signs of ‘odious’ and ‘noxious’ White Supremacism.

But the notion of White National Liberation, White Emancipation, White Autonomy, and White Sovereignty gives the lie to the Jewish Narrative. White Identity is not about white supremacist will to lord over other peoples but the white desire to break free of the real supremacism in America that is totally Jewish. Jews are masters of projection, and they are merely projecting their own supremacism onto whites to shame and guilt-bait whites into remaining as perennial servants and cucks of Jews. This is why Jews are banning the notion of white people seeking liberation from Jewish Supremacism that really rules American business, media, academia, law, and politics(which is mostly about gentile cucks taking money from Jews and doing as told).

In a nutshell, the US is a Jewish Culture of Hate where all Americans are obligated to hate whomever and whatever happens to be hated by Jewish Globalist Supremacists.
Why do Jewish Supremacists hate Alt Right? Because Alt Right won’t join in on this culture of Jewish Supremacist Hate. Alt Right refuses to hate Russia for defending itself from Jewish globalist financial rapists. Alt Right refuses to hate Iran, a nation that hasn’t invaded anyone and hasn’t a single nuke. Alt Right refuses to hate Syria, a secular-modern nation before Zionist-controlled US pushed ‘color revolution’ into it to foment mayhem and chaos. US and its allies violated Syrian borders and sent terrorist killers to rape, loot, and destroy ancient treasures. CIA aided Jihadi lunatics. Alt Right refuses to hate Palestinians, a people who’ve long been treated like white patriots are treated in US and EU. Alt Right refuses to hate Venezuela. Let Venezuela embark on its own course, whether left or right. It’s not the business of America to stick its nose into the affairs of Latin American nations. Alt Right refuses to hate Hungary for wanting to maintain Hungary as a Hungarian civilization of people and culture. Alt Right refuses to hate Poland for insisting that Poland remain Polish in ethnos, territory, and memory.
Alt Right refuses to join in the Jewish Supremacist Culture of Hate. It is for white identity and interests independent of the Jewish Globalist Mafia boss. The Big Jewish Hater accuses Alt Right of hate to mask his own ugly hate.
Alt Right howls like a wolf independent of the master narrative decreed by Jews. The wolf-hunt is on. Jewish masters and their pack of cuck-dogs are out to capture, muzzle, and cage Alt Right wolves. But always remember… the howl of a lone wolf can be heard over greater distances than the barking of a thousand dogs. An independent wolf is nobler for its freedom and independence. That is why Jews fear the idea of White National Liberation.

Why We Need to be Vigilant of the Power of the TEMPLATE

Some on the Patriotic Right fret about the corrosive effects of Cult of White Guilt, but it’s actually a secondary problem flowing from a much bigger one, namely the power of the TEMPLATE.

The Template decides who are approved & who can accuse as opposed to who are accused & who must atone.

But once the Template is smashed, it doesn’t matter what people believe as individuals. The personal consciences of individuals matter only in relation to the condemnation or consecration by the Template held by the Power. Why does one’s personal views and feelings about Jews matter in America but one’s views and feelings about Buddhists don’t? It’s because the Template protects and favors Jews but is utterly indifferent about Buddhists. So, a person can love or hate Buddhists, and it wouldn’t matter one way or the other. Neither loving nor hating Buddhists is either an advantage or a disadvantage. The Template just doesn’t care. But if one’s feelings about Jews were made known, it’d have serious consequences on the social, economic, and political level because Jews are so central to the Template.

Take communism in East Germany. As long as the System was in place, the Template was “Marxism-Leninism is the eternal truth, and good communists are on the side of angels, and it is their right and duty to accuse and expose anti-communist heretics.”
Under the System, the pro-communists could accuse and condemn anyone deemed anti-communist. They didn’t need to explain or justify their feelings and actions. The System ensured its supporters to take for granted the infallibility of Marxism-Leninism. All they had to do was point fingers and accuse. Destroy the enemy and feel justified as good comrades. As for the accused, they had to either deny the charges of anti-communism or defy the system with all the courage they could muster(and almost invariably pay a heavy price). The System enforced the Marxist-Leninist Template. Even if we were to suppose everyone in East Germany, communist and anti-communist alike, was motivated by the purest ideals and principles, what ultimately decided their fate was not their individual consciences but the Template that had the power to choose winners and losers.

But once the System came tumbling down in East Germany, it no longer mattered if there remained hardline communists or Marxist true believers. The System no longer existed to protect and favor them. Whether few or many, they were now all alone to make their case without the System enforcing the Template in their favor.

Also, their accusations no longer carried any weight. They suddenly lacked the power to affect the lives of others because the Template no longer existed to lend them support against others. If anything, there was the sudden realization that their power had been illusory. Because they could destroy other lives under communism, they’d been lulled into believing that their personal sense of righteousness, in and of itself, had the force of history. But in fact, it had been the systemic wind behind their backs that had created the impression of having agency in history.
It’s like Christians in a Christian Order may feel empowered by Faith alone. After all, the Christian Faithful feel blessed in a Christian system that favors their kind. One could easily overlook the crucial role of the system and believe in God as the source of one’s blessed position in society. But one’s favored status really owes to the power of the Church that endorses and ensures the privilege of the true believers. If the power of the Church were to fade, their faith alone wouldn’t amount to a plate of beans. Today, American Christians have begun to realize this. Because core institutions of America are now effectively post-Christian(and even anti-Christian), what with the Template consecrating Jews-Negroes-Homos above all others, being a Christian today has little resonance within the domains of power. If anything, it could be a liability in many key areas.

Anyway, the fall of East German communism meant that anti-communists no longer needed to fear informers or cower before their accusers. They no longer needed to deny their anti-communism. They no longer needed to defend or justify their anti-Leninism. They could freely express their disdain for communism.
And as long as the New Template favored those who called out against communists of the prior regime, their anti-communism had value as a token of power. But once the New Template lost interest in making an example of former communists, even anti-communism came to mean nothing. In time, neither having served communism nor having resisted communism carried any water in the New Order where the Template was devised and enforced by globalists.

Same logic applies to the cult of ‘white guilt’. It’s not the feeling itself that is most worrisome. Same goes for the cult of Diversity and Homomania. Before Diversity and Homomania were promoted as part of the Official Template, it didn’t matter if one espoused nationalism or anti-homo sentiments. One could openly question or mock Diversity or the Homo agenda prior to their consecration into the Template. And it didn’t matter if some people were pro-homo-agenda or pro-mass-invasion. They lacked the backing of the Template and could therefore be pushed back because they stood alone with their own convictions.

But once Diversity was canonized into the Template, its advocates had the blessings of the System. And its opponents were effectively excommunicated by the System. If an idea isn’t yet canonical, opposing it cannot be heretical. Thus, while opposing it may lead to heated arguments with its advocates, one cannot be destroyed by the System for harboring such views because the System has yet to canonize the idea that would render such views heretical.

Once elite institutions canonized the tenets of PC, opposing views were no longer regarded as mere disagreements or dissent but as heresies of ‘hate’. So, with the full spectrum of elite opinion from left to right chanting the sacred mantra of ‘Diversity is our strength, the message was loud and clear that Diversity now has the full blessing of the Template. It was no longer a position among other possible positions but The Position, the Only Position.

So, the key issue isn’t White Guilt per se. Such sentiments always exist because any society(even non-white ones) will have its share of self-loathing types who love to make a spectacle of their higher virtue via atonement and redemption.
What gave Self-Loathing Whites or SLW’s the moral and political advantage is that the Globalist elites used their immense power to push the Iron Template of Diversity and Homomania. So, SLW’s are now favored in the way that communist zealots, communist toadies, and communist hacks were favored in Stasi-dominated East Germany. But notice how the commies in all walks of life lost their advantage overnight when the System came down. Being communist in a system tailored to Marxism-Leninism was like having an anti-gravity belt. But once the system’s power was shut down, those hovering in the air all came crashing down. Tragicomically, while they were up in the air, they thought their power of levitation emanated from within their own souls. They learned the truth the hard way when the system no longer supplied power to their belts. It's like a soldier has the power to kill other people as long as he is consecrated as a 'hero' by the System. But back in civilian life, he realizes his 'power' of 'heroism' totally depended on the System.

So, the problem isn’t so much the existence of SLW’s, annoyingly unbearable as they may be. Rather, it’s that they are blessed by the System that calls for Open Season on White Heretics, aka the Patriots. Once the Template is smashed, the Patriots can fight back with the full force of facts, logic, and passion, and then, SLW’s will have to stand on their own legs in the fight that they will inevitably lose. After all, those who hate their own kind will lose to those who love their own kind. Also, the support of the Template made the SLW’s spoiled and lazy. Their reliance on anti-gravity belts powered by the Template made their bones weak.

We must smash the Template, or the Tabernacle.

AMERICAN MADE starring Tom Cruise Showcases the Limits of Free Will

*The views below are in relation to the movie, not to actual events. It goes without saying that any Hollywood claiming to be based on a true story takes considerable liberties for sake of entertainment or politics. Even though many of the events in the movie have been disputed, what does ring true is the depiction of a certain psychological strain of American Freedom.

Americans love to think of themselves as free. After all, America is called the Land of the Free. Even though many nations around the world claim to be free and democratic, the brand has really stuck to one nation, the United States. USA is the land of liberty, individuality, and the dream. Due to its great spaces and tremendous resources, enterprising individuals have been able to achieve more in America than elsewhere. Its relative meritocracy and Rule of Law also made America the favorite destination for those seeking freedom and fortune. And even those who live outside the US have looked to America as the market of choice. Whether it’s German or Japanese companies selling cars or Colombian cartels selling drugs, there has never been a richer market than America. It’s the first nation that people want to come to, the first nation that people want to sell to. And even though the US has faded in certain industries, it is still second to none in the production of high-tech, military-ware, food products, energy, media, drugs, and academia.

But sometimes, people can lose sight of things. Icarus, having wings, thought he would fly as high as wished. And "Sky is the limit" could be the motto of the character in AMERICAN MADE. He is a free-spirited pilot with brash adventurousness to dive into one risky business after another. Because of this reckless stuntman-like quality, he is seen as useful by many people. Indeed, it’s ironic that the CIA selects him as prime candidate for its mission. After all, the CIA knows he has a carefree and opportunistic streak, smuggling illegal contraband while working as a TWA pilot. He doesn’t play by the rules. But that is exactly why he’s an asset because it takes a man with knack for transgression who will thrive in dangerous operations that requires flights over territories controlled by Marxist guerrillas who readily shoot at what they suspect as spy planes.

One could say, the Cruise’s character, Barry Seal, is partly motivated by patriotism, but he isn’t particularly political. One might say he was pressured into taking the job since the CIA has the dirt on his smuggling of Cuban cigars. But it’s not like he committed a capital crime. No, what motivates him most is the thrill of adventure. He seems unfazed even when his plane is hit by guerrillas and feels exhilaration in carrying mission after mission. He’s more soldier of fun(and later of fortune) than patriot or true-believer.

His cowboy spirit makes him an All-American character, even something of a ‘hero’ at times, but is he really free when he doesn’t think about anything he’s doing? He does it with free-spiritedness but seems utterly lacking in curiosity as to the history and politics of Latin America. This begs the question. What does it mean to be free? If we let a dog outside, it runs around freely. So do horses. They feel free in spirit and enjoy the rush of feeling wild and alive. But are animals really free? Aren’t they following their instincts? Also, they are free only as long as their human masters let them run free.

When people act wild and free, are they any better or higher than animals? Aren’t they really acting on impulse? And this applies to Barry Seal. His freedom is closer to that of an animal than a thinking human. While it’s true that he, as an individual, chose to take on the role of sky pilot, his emotional involvement is like that of a dog or horse running wild. As for intellect, meaning, and morality, there is nothing. He’s like a child, an animal, an barbarian despite the fact that he gets to use all sorts of sophisticated machines and gadgets at the behest of the government.
But then, this question is relevant to modern life in general. Our electronic media get more sophisticated with advancements in technology, but most of what passes through the grids and airwaves is mindless childishness, barbarism, or savagery. Even a cowboy in the Classic Western was freer in the sense that he understood the moral choice between the good and the bad. But such considerations never enter into the mind of Barry Seals. Though vaguely instructed of the Cold War dichotomy between good ole USA and evil USSR(that is supposedly seeking beach-heads in Central America), Seal is purely in it for the adventure. As a gung-ho pilot, he feels alive and free, but there’s no meaning to his life. Freedom without meaning, purpose, and direction is like a cocaine high, a nihilism.

Indeed, consider the steady decline of White America since the 60s when freedom was severed from issues of moralism and set free to indulge in hedonism. We all love Rock music and the Beach Boys, but that kind of freedom centered on thrills and good-time turned white people into hares who just took things easy and for granted as long as they could have their fun, fun, fun. Meanwhile the demographic tortoise was closing in on them. They never asked what is really happening to their nation because the primary focus of their lives was the pursuit of happiness at the crassest level. So, while white Californians were surfing or acting the Valley Girl, real history was happening and masses of non-white immigrants were fundamentally altering the landscape demographically, politically, and culturally.

Because Seal is so hollow at the core, the arrow of his freedom is decided by the wills of others with a plan or agenda. So, he is turned into a tool of the CIA. But he easily becomes a tool of the drug cartel. When confronted with drug lords who want him to fly narcotics to the US, Seal decides to make the bargain. Now, one could argue he didn’t have much of a choice. CIA sent him to Latin America but didn’t give him much cover or protection. So, when surrounded by drug gangs, he is vulnerable and isn’t in a position to Just Say No. And yet, he doesn’t just agree to a single flight to make it to safety to the US. He decides to go whole hog as carrier for the drug cartel. And because he does it with such gusto, he fools himself into thinking he’s a cowboy in control of his destiny. If he’d really thought of his situation, he might have realized that he was not free in making the decision. The drug lords made it for him, and he had no choice. But because he is doing something exciting and daring, he once again feels free, and he mistakes that feel of freedom for real freedom when, in fact, he’s become a running dog of the drug cartel. If he was really honest with himself, he could have transported the first shipment of drugs and then gone to the CIA and informed them what really happened. But no. Just like he’d mindlessly taken on the CIA mission for thrills, he finds new thrills with being an aerial smuggler of drugs.

This becomes the pattern for the rest of his life. After being imprisoned in Colombia along with members of the drug gang(who soon gain freedom through bribes and/or threats), he is sprung out by the CIA because it has another mission for him, this time to transport arms to the Contras in Nicaragua. Again, he is more than willing since it’s better to fly around in a plane than be stuck in some seedy prison in Latin America. Again, his life is adventurous, and he feels free and independent.
But again, he had no choice in the matter. The only reason why he is free is because he agreed to the deal. He is to play a key role in supplying the Contras with arms so that they will overthrow the Sandinista government. The problem is reality on the ground is so at odds with the American grand strategy that is about as ridiculous as that of the Soviets. Both sides present themselves as being on the right side of history, the true torch-bearers of justice and liberty. But Soviet Union was then a stagnant empire running on empty in terms of ideas and goods. As for the US, it was more an empire of excess, vanity, and greed than virtue or ideals.
As for the Third World peoples caught between the great powers, they hadn’t a clue what was what and had no concern other than "gimme what’s mine". Indeed, it is hilarious to watch the US involve itself in so much ‘necessary evil’ of corruption to aid the supposedly idealistic and patriotic Contras made up of a rag-tag bunch of bumpkins and halfwits. In such context, idealism is for fools, and so, the cynical operators like Noriega, drug cartels, and deep state operatives in the US have the upper hand and play the game every which way they can. And if someone like Oliver North was a true believer in what he did, he was just a simple-minded idiot.

Anyway, Barry Seal is bounced around like a pinball. The sheer frenzy lends a sense of vibrancy and freedom, but there is no real agency. Seal is so without purpose or plan that he has no idea what to do with all the money he’s making from the drug trade. He just loves feeling like a rock star on tour, going from concert to concert, pumping up the volume to drown out everything but the thrill of the moment. Seal is addicted to the high life but has no real sense of life. His spirit is always up in the air and never grounded to anything like a soul. In a way, one could say he has the most infantile kind of globalist-mindset. He has no loyalty to anything even though, to his credit, he does stick with his family. But his home is just a rest-station for him to crash in before he’s back to his high-octane adventures again.

In some ways, he’s like the Henry Hill character in GOODFELLAS, the adaptive flunky who leans whichever the wind blows. But Seal is more of a cowboy with nerves of steel under fire. He also seems to relish living on the edge, like everyday is a gamble of life and death. And yet, despite his nerves and derring do, he’s never anything more than a ball kicked around by the real players because he lacks a moral compass and vision of humanity.

There are three ways to be truly free. One is to have real moral sense. A moralist, in favoring principles over the easy prize, may not gain great wealth or power. But he has the pride of righteousness. He can tell himself that he chose the path of virtue with his free will. Now, it may well be that ‘losers’ may use moralism as a crutch for their relative failure in life, like the Ed Harris character spouts off about the ‘working man’ every time something goes wrong in GLEN GARRY GLENROSS. (Of course, he cheats too when he sees the chance. His moralism is fake, an excuse.) A true moralist is someone who could have gotten something by bending the rules but didn't because his conscience told him not to. The main character of PRINCE OF THE CITY is a true moralist, albeit not a perfect one, but then, that’s precisely the point of that film.

The second way of freedom is to be a committed immoralist. In a way, the drug lords in AMERICAN MADE are freer than Barry Seal. They are not in it just for the fun and thrill of it. They are not boys who wanna play with toys. They are committed to creating an empire of greed. They are awful disgusting people, but they do have a purpose in life, however wicked it may be. They will kill and even die for this ‘dream’ of theirs. They don’t care if their dope turns countless lives into living nightmares. They have a plan and will do anything to see it through all the way. They are filthy gangsters, but they’ve freely chose to commit themselves to some purpose in life.

The third way of freedom is to be an amoralist-realist, like the character of Akira Kurosawa’s YOJIMBO. Henry Kissinger and Zhou En-lai were amoralist-realists. They were not lacking in moral sense, but they knew that if they stuck to moral principles, they’d either fail to move up the rungs of power or end up purged and persecuted. So, they decided to betray what many of us would consider basic moral principles. They accepted the world for what it is and the game of power as deadly competition rife with ugliness and corruption. And yet, the world is what it is, and those who decide to play the game simply can’t keep their hands clean.
But even as their means are often sordid, they do have a vision that isn't void of moral design. They think in terms of means-to-an-end, not means-as-the-end. In contrast, the immoralists like the drug cartel just revel in vileness because that is the final summation of what they’re about. Granted, there is a grey area between immoralists and amoralist-realists. Everyone who works in government, especially in the intelligence services, see themselves as amoralist-realists who accept the need to play dirty to win the war for the good guys. It’s like George Smiley is not above using dirty tricks in TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY and SMILEY’S PEOPLE to prevail over the enemy. But his side did it because the other did it too. It was just the nature of the game. It’s like even a 'good war' cannot be won without killing innocent civilians and being tarnished with some degree of atrocities and war crimes. But then, nothing can be done if moral perfection is the only option.
Anyway, even though people in government like to tell themselves that they do bad things for the higher vision of the ultimate good, there’s too much evidence that a lot of people in government, especially the deep state, are really sociopaths and egotistical lunatics who are addicted to power and control. They may not get ultra-rich doing what they do, but power is their drug and their main motivation. The ‘new cold war’ with Russia endorsed by the deep state cannot be understood in any other way. Also, even though they pose as well-educated elites committed to the ideology of ‘human rights’ and ‘progress’, the real animating principle is the exclusive vanity of insider privilege and the pissing contest of egos. More than any idea, value, or principle, what matters to them most if that they are on the inside unlike most people who are on the outside. Status and the cult of secret knowledge that make them feel so special is what they’re really about. And just to stay on the inside, they will change their tune and serve a new agenda if doing so keeps them on the inside and climbing the ranks. And this is why they need to keep playing the game by creating more enemies all over the world. They need bounties to collect so as to burnish their credentials. It’s a club of trophy hunters who target entire nations just so that the members can feel big about themselves. Bagging a lion or elephant is bad enough. But these deep state elites try to bag entire nations as trophies. Or they try to keep vassal states like tigers or bears in a zoo. They want control for control’s sake.

Anyway, even though AMERICAN MADE is not a great movie, it is enthralling from beginning to end, and it does make us think about the illusion of free will. It shows how a man can feel so free living so freely despite completely being at the mercy of much greater powers. It’s like a skilled surfer can ride the waves but is powerless to change the course of those waves. All he can do is coast on them and try to remain standing. Life is like that for most of humanity, so what is the problem with Barry Seal? It’s that his skills as a surfer — he is really talented in slipping through the Charybdis and Scylla of the powers arrayed around him — fools him into thinking he has agency and control beyond his penchant for squeezing out of tight spots with the help of luck. Also, he’s so sure that he’s indispensable to all sides that he fails to see how he is equally dispensable, again to all sides, as well. The US government and drug cartels value him for his willingness to play it loose to get things done. All sides see him as an asset but also a handicap. The only way he can stay in the game is to please all sides. A tightrope walker may feel free up high in the air, but how much freedom does he really have? His only choice is to walk along the narrowness of the rope. One wrong step, and down he goes.

Mass Immigration by Foreign Elements Is Imperialism, Pure and Simple

US should have severely restricted non-white immigrants like the Founders intended.

We hear all this whining about ‘hate’, but ‘hate’ is appropriate to cases where a people aggressively attack and invade other peoples, not when they defend their turf from outsiders who are different in race and culture.
Were Algerians and Vietnamese ‘haters’ against the French in their resistance struggles? No, they only hated French aggression and imperialism. They had no hostility against the French nation per se. They were only trying to reclaim their beloved homelands from foreign occupiers.

Japan doesn’t want to be invaded and colonized by Muslims. Is that ‘hate’?
Must a people invite demographic invasion to be on the side of angels? No, a people who invite invasion are HATE their own kind. Self-hate is the worst kind of crime.

Donald Trump deserves a lot of criticism from all sides, but on the plus side, he has allowed Russia and Iran to finish off the psychopathic ISIS in Syria. He also condemned the Iraq War and Libyan War during the Presidential campaign. If anything, it was the ‘progressives’ who were tight-lipped about all the War Crimes committed against Libya, Ukraine, and Syria during the Obama-Hillary years. Notice that those who now claim to love Muslims did nothing to protest the invasions and destruction of Muslim nations prior to Trump’s victory.

Now, if Trump’s stupid talk about Iran turns into real escalation, he’s be just another pezzonovante of the Jews. I suspect he has no personal animus against Iran. He’s just sucking up to Zionists because Jews are the real masters of America no matter which way you turn. Paradoxically, one has to be more pro-Zionist if hated by most Jews. Because Jew Worship is mandatory and because ‘antisemitism’ is a cardinal sin, one has to go the extra step to prove one’s pro-Jewish credentials when attacked by Jews themselves. Since Jews say Trump is hitler, Trump must do heavy-lifting to demonstrate he’s the best friend of Jews and the ultimate shill for Israel. Even so, there’s no guarantee that he will opt for war with Iran. He could be using heated rhetoric against Iran to keeps the Jews at bay.

Concerning the ‘refugees’, the solution is for the US to stop meddling in the Middle East. Then chances of war will greatly diminish, and then, there will be no more refugees. Muslims can stay in their own nations. If Muslims want to flee their own nations even in peacetime, it means they hate their own kind and prefer to live with whites. They would be the self-haters. Why should the West welcome self-hating Muslims who don’t even want to live with their own kind?

Anyway, no nation can survive by allowing massive foreign invasion-immigration. Mass immigration of foreigners IS invasion. Mass arrival of Jews led to destruction of Palestine. Mass arrival of Spanish led to demise of native peoples in Meso-America. Hawaiians are a minority in their own homeland because of white and yellow mass immigration. The only kind of immigration that works on a large scale is one that lets in the same kind of people. This is why Israeli immigration is Jewish Only. More Jews arriving in the Jewish State means Replenishment, not Replacement. But if Israel allowed tons of non-Jewish immigrants, Jews will face Replacement, and then, the Israel as Jewish State is lost forever.

Anyone who pushes mass immigration by foreigners is an imperialist.

People like Hillary Clinton, Angela Merkel, Theresa May, John McCain, Joe Biden, the Bush clan, and etc no longer have any concern for their own race, culture, and people. They identify with power and privilege(mostly dominated by Jews). If it’s globalism they must serve to keep their positions and privilege, they will do so.

The difference between past imperialism and current imperialism is the former was about one people colonizing another people’s land whereas the latter is about ALL nations being demographically colonized by all peoples as the elites around the world collude to favor their own aggrandizement and privilege above all other considerations. Of course, Israel gets pass-over rights in being exempted from obligation to welcome foreign invaders.
But then, which people control globalism? Only Jews are allowed an arrangement where elites identify with and protect their ethnic kin. Among gentiles, elites are to despise and abandon their own national folks in favor of the company of ‘cosmopolitan’ People of Privilege, all of whom must serve the higher power of Jewish Globalist Supremacism.

Of course, these immigrant-invaders play the passive/aggressive game. They aggressively colonize other nations but then play ‘victims’ of ‘hateful bigoted natives’ who won’t let more of them in. Just look at those Hindus. They seek to take over Anglo-made worlds with massive colonization, but they harp as ‘victims’ of ‘racism’ and ‘xenophobia’. Invading other nations is now a ‘human right’ according to globo-dominated UN. Mass invasion by boat, foot, or by plane is hailed as some god-given right. So, the US is expected to offer ‘sanctuary’ to illegals sacralized as ‘dreamers’. EU must absorb all those who invade by boat or boot.

Natives are supposed to be in self-hate mode and gain love points only by welcoming invaders.

How did the world become this stupid?

Why White National Liberation Movement Must be Wary of Asians in America

White National Liberationists are familiar with the machinations of Jewish power, the plague of black thuggery, and the Reconquista revanchism of Mexicans. But what about Asians, especially East Asians, who constitute an invisible minority? How do Asians fit into the bigger picture?
If America were a white-dominant nation, there would be little to worry about as Asians are programmed genetically and culturally to obey and conform to the prevailing power. Unfortunately, the ruling elites of America are not white gentiles but Jews, most of whom are hostile to white identity and white interests. Just like Asians in the Soviet Union dutifully served the central authority of the Communist Party, Asians in current America will dutifully serve the prevailing authority of Jews & Homos in promoting Diversity, White Guilt, Homomania, and Negro-Worship.

Most East Asians in America are proggy because they’re yellow dogs. As teacher's pets and imitative followers, they uncritically swallow the official ideology without reflection or contemplation. Consider the Cultural Revolution that ravaged China in the 1960s. Consider how Japanese became fanatic militarists during WWII. And then, under American Occupation, the Japanese became the most obedient toadies of Uncle Sam even though the US had killed millions of Japanese. Koreans have shown themselves to be little more than imitative monkeys or servile dogs. Either they are imitating rapper thugs or serving as commissars of PC. In the Vietnam War, they served as yellow attack dogs of the US empire. Perhaps, higher IQ was wasted on East Asians, a race of dog-like people that know how to learn and follow but not how to lead and think.

Since PC dogma reigns in the US, yellow dogs mostly lean to the ‘left’ and bark rabidly at ‘whitey’. Mao made his minions destroy thousands of years’ worth of arts and treasures all over China. The victorious US tamed Japanese into a bunch of hapless toadies. Uncle Sam merely needed to yell "Attack" to make South Korean dogs maul and murder Vietnamese. North Korean masses are mindless robots and dogs of the Kim regime. Sure, there are always exceptions, but history is made by the general rule, not by outliers.

Given the nature of Asians, it’s hardly surprising that some of the most rabid and virulent anti-white agents in America are these yellow dogs who bark on command of Jews, homos, and Negroes. Since Jews rule the US and have anointed Homos and Negroes as the quintessential and iconic Americans and Magical People, the slavish and dog-like Asians feel it is their duty to serve the Three Holy Peoples. If the Holy Three say whites are the source of all evil and injustice, yellow dogs in their roles as teacher's pets will bark like mad at white people even though the ONLY reason why Asians got to enjoy their place in American society is because Europeans envisioned, founded, and did most to build America. Yes, yes, blacks did a lot of heavy lifting in the slavery era, and Chinese played a key role in the building of railroads, but without Europeans, there would be no America, period. But that isn’t what is taught or emphasized in schools; therefore, Asians, as simple-minded teacher's pets, tend to earnestly follow the official narrative of PC that permeates all textbooks. Also, because they are so deficient in the Cool Factor, they are so eager to seem hip and 'edgy' by imitating or sucking up to Pop Cultural fashions that glorify blacks, homos, and Jews. Even though white gentiles are prominently featured in Pop Culture, they are not allowed to express any racial identity, solidarity, or pride, and almost all villains are white, except in cases where they are Asian or Muslim. (Notice the villains are almost never Jews, homos, or blacks.)
While it’s true that many Asian kids don’t come to America with anti-white animus or are raised that way by their parents, even they will likely turn proggy once they undergo years of PC indoctrination. Also, being status-obsessed, yellow dogs will submit and conform to ANY ideology that happens to be associated in the Current Year with prestige and social approval. While all people try to avoid social opprobrium, such concern is a much bigger factor among Asians because they lack a strong sense of individuality. As such, their main identity comes from fitting in, belonging, and being approved by others. Notice how the Japanese are so mindful not to upset the cart and raise the ire of the larger community. While this aspect of Asian-ness comes with certain advantages — more cohesion and cooperation — , the downside is Asian individuals tend to be more defined by what OTHERS think of them than what they themselves think in their heart of hearts. As such, a true sense-of-self fails to fully mature and develop among Asians.
Since Americanized Asians seem more outgoing and expressive than Asians in Asia, one may be tempted to think that they have gained or developed true individuality. But in fact, most of them are merely trying to imitate the American Norms to win acceptance and approval. In contrast, Jews, Homos, and blacks, despite their minority status, have exhibited stronger will, attitude, and agency in creating their own styles and narratives, in time even changing the norms of the White Gentile Straight majority itself. In contrast, Asians in America, as ‘yellow cake’, is blander than ‘white bread’. Having no assertive will of their own, Asians need to draw upon the energies of the Other to feel purposeful in life. Why did so many Chinese become such mindless sheep of Mao? Having no individual will or soul, they were attracted to the Great Man who imbued their dog-like existence with direction and goal.

This is why most Asians in America are proggy, filled with anti-white animus, and call for Diversity.
As the most powerful will, attitude, and agency are now with Jews, homos, and blacks, most Asians in America obey Jews, serve black rage, and worship homos. If Asians in Past White-Christian-dominated America tended to become good obedient Christians, today’s Asians become commissars of PC or consumers of trashy Pop Culture.

Most Asians in America are earnest-naive-stupid. At least Jews push PC notion like Diversity to boost their own power. Jews are the ruling elites who use Diversity for divide-and-rule strategy in a gentile majority nation. Jews are too smart to push for non-Jewish diversity in Israel. So, Jews know what they’re doing. They know PC and ideology are mere instruments to further Jewish Power. They don’t really believe in that stuff. Faith in PC is for the birds. It’s like Stalin and Mao used Marxism for their own ends. They often deviated from the theory because their main agenda was about power and control. Smart people know that ideas exist to serve a people. Stupid or childlike people believe they exist to serve an idea. Jews, being smart and savvy, know well enough to promote Diversity in gentile nations but NOT in Israel.

In contrast, earnest yellow dogs ingest the Rules of PC as holy text. They seek academic and professional success in the West not to gain dominance but to serve the dominant power, which currently happens to be Jewish and Homo. And since yellows swallow the PC whole hog, they sincerely export the nonsense back to their homelands. All those imitative yellows in Canada and US are regurgitating the PC they imbibed(in Jew-homo-run America) back to their nations of origin. Why is else Taiwan so crazy for ‘gay marriage’ now?

Paradoxically, as yellows gain more positions in elite ranks in the West, they will end up doing more harm to their own kind as well as to whites. Just think: Yellows seek status to serve the Dominant Power that happens to be Jewish-Homo-Americanus. Since Jewish-Homo-American globalism is against all vestiges of gentile-nationalism, these privileged yellows in high positions will eventually export anti-gentile-nationalism to their own homelands and end up unwittingly working AGAINST their own kind. Because Asians in America are so devotional to the Dominant Power as the purveyor of all truth, they earnestly believe that PC is the highest good for all mankind. (They are too innocent and stupid to ask, "If Jews push this Diversity stuff on gentile nations, why don’t they do likewise on Israel?") Asians in America gaining elite positions doesn’t necessarily translate into greater Asian power. If anything, the result could be the very opposite. It’s like, when a Negro was elevated from a Field Negro to a House Negro, it made the prospect of black power and liberation even dimmer. Why? The House Negro wasn’t allowed into the master’s house to take over. Rather, he was let in to serve the massuh in controlling the rest of the Negroes even better. Likewise, these yellow dogs enter Ivy League colleges to become servants than masters. Just look at the spread of homomaniacal crap in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and even Vietnam, the proud nation that sacrificed millions of lives to drive out American Imperialists!

Whites must oppose yellows as either servants or masters. There is no reason for white nations to be ruled by non-white elites/masters of any kind. Also, when yellows become servants, they are NOT serving white gentile nationalism but Jewish-Homo Globalism. Because the West is ruled by Jews and Homos(the quasi-spiritual proxies of Jews), white people have become a subject people, a colonized people. Since yellows love to serve the Master, they currently serve Jews and Homos to break the body and will of white gentiles.
But then, since the Jewish-Homo agenda is to weaken the national pride & unity of all gentile nations, these yellow dogs will, in time, serve as agents of Jew-Homo-Globalism in the cucking of Asia. Taiwan is a harbinger of things to come. It is now just a yellow Canada, a cultural Puerto Rico of the Homo West.

Given their nature, yellows will never gain dominance in the West, but they are dangerous nevertheless because they are diligent and dutiful servants of the Power(of Jews and homos). And if yellows feel frustration and dissatisfaction in America, Jews will manipulate childish Asian minds to blame it all on Whitey. So, if black criminality harms Asians, it’s Whitey’s fault. If Jewish Hollywood stereotypes or excludes Asians, it’s Whitey’s fault. If Jewish-run elite colleges discriminate against Asians, it’s Whitey’s fault. If some Asians lose themselves in drugs and decadence, it’s Whitey’s fault. Now, why would Asians in America be discontent? Some Asians will surely wonder why they never seem to gain real traction and power despite their excelling in academics. In truth, they fail to gain dominance because, once they come to the West, yellow women lose all respect for dorkus yellow men like the silly ‘Jap’ loser in FARGO. So, even as they pass exams, they fail in making love and life, and this failure now has infected yellow nations themselves. Also, as alpha Asians will mix with whites & other races, the remaining Asians will become even more passive and dorky because the alpha genes will have been lost even more from the Asian gene pool. It’s pure genetics as more able and adventurous Asians mix with other races. So, those Asians who stick together will be dorkier and dorkier… like Amish genetics being weeded of adventurous and individualistic traits.

So, yellows are not dangerous like Jews with a powerful sense of identity, indeed even when they didn’t have a nation of their own for 1000s of yrs. In contrast, Asians lose their identity and culture the moment they leave their homelands. In their new nation, they just want acceptance and approval from the dominant power, which currently happens to be Jewish-Homo Globalism with Negroes as magical icons.

Still, yellows will make a difference in the future of American Power because they will serve as the most dutiful commissars of PC. Look how all these yellow dog judges and lawyers have been working so diligently to block Trump’s agenda and the interests of white Americans. For that reason, yellow dogs must go.

Now, the Hindus… that’s another story. They are more likely to stick together. There is less out-marriage, so their identity will remain more intact.
Also, Hinduism has a sense of truth beyond the temporal, and this gives them a power akin to that of Jews.
East Asians, steeped in Confucian philosophy, have no sense of power or truth beyond the political or social. The biggest man-made power is the ultimate authority for East Asians. So, if PC is the highest man-made authority in the West, East Asians kowtow to it 100%. It’s no wonder why so many Chinese swallowed Maoism 100%. When Mao was alive, he was god-emperor simply because he had the most political power.

In contrast, even as Hindus or Dotkins play along with PC, their cultural habit is to behold(and hide) a sense of truth deeper and higher than the ever-changing social constructions of man.
Jews had this sense too. Even when dwarfed by much greater political-military might of gentile empires, their sense of the Covenant with God made them feel special and unique beyond any temporal or worldly consideration. Their ethno-spiritual consciousness meant more than all the empires of the world. Hindus, with a similar ‘ethno-spiritual’ worldview, are more adept at the chess game of power. They know how to play all the pieces whereas East Asians only know how to play the subordinate pieces to serve whatever happens to be dominant man-made power of the Current Year.

P.S.

Asian-Americans will be the uber-unter(or over-under) class.

They will rise over the great white middle but serve as commissars under Jewish, Homo, and white cuck elites.

Yellows are diligent and study hard to make the climb but lack agency to think or lead on their own. They only know how to follow, imitate, seek approval, and obey orders. So, they will be the commissar-class of globo-hegemony. They will work against both white patriots in America and yellow patriots in Asia. They will identify mainly with globalism and seek privilege within it. As commissars of Jews and Homos, they will work to undermine white power in the West and subvert native sovereignty in Asian nations. It’s like Francis Fukuyama is a shill of George Soros. He doesn’t defend Japan from globalism. He wants Japan to be open to globalist elite and demographic takeover.

Jewish Globalists push Diversity in elite institutions to make gentile elites identify mainly with their shared privilege under Jewish hegemony than with their own national folks.
British Imperialists employed the same strategy. They trained diverse elites of all colors to identify primarily with British Imperial Glory than with their own peoples. So, if Hindu, African, Arab, or Asian elites all studied together in British institutions, they were likely to identify more with one another as blessed subjects of the British Empire than identify with their own racial kin back home. (In the past, white ‘racism’ awakened the diverse elites to their inferior status within the Empire, and their hurt pride inspired them to struggle for national liberation than continue to serve the Empire of White Privilege. But because the Jewish-dominated American Empire now often favors non-white elites over whites(who are usually blamed for everything), there is a great temptation for non-white elites to side with globalism than with their native folks. The new imperialism of globalism allows non-white elites to reach the top in America and Europe, the richest areas of the world. So, non-white elites often choose to permanently align with American globalism than with their the nationalism of their own folks. If anything, they work with Jews to undermine the sovereignty of their own nations. Because of the PC impression that 'white supremacy' and 'white privilege' are the greatest evils in the West, non-white elites think they are taking over the West by besting the whites. What they remain unaware of is that Jewish supremacists who hold the real power are merely using Asians against white power. So, the rise of Asians in the West is not about gaining mastery but serving the true mastery of Jews who, after having fatally weakened white power, will do the same thing to Asian nations with, of course, the collaboration of Asian agents of globalism.

The Old Imperialism came under attack following WWII as Anti-Imperialist struggles accelerated around the world, heralding the Golden Age of Universal Nationalism.

But, following the end of the Cold War, Jewish-Homo globo-hegemony centered has been pushing a new kind of Universal Imperialism where ALL NATIONS(except Israel) are pressured to resign themselves to massive demographic invasion and the cultural imperialism of Homomania and Negromania.

If white gentile patriots ruled America, yellows would dutifully serve them. But because PC is the official Template of the land, the naturally servile yellows will serve Jewish/Homo globalists and Mulattoes. Also, they will race-mix with Jews, white cuck elites, and mulattoes. They'll just be the minions of Jewish-Homo or Jomo Globalism.